Professional Documents
Culture Documents
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Jan 2021. | This topic last updated: Jan 26, 2021.
INTRODUCTION
A lung abscess is circumscribed, purulent infection contained with the lung parenchyma.
Most lung abscesses arise as a complication of aspiration. As such, they are typically
polymicrobial and indolent in onset. Less commonly, lung abscesses complicate acute
monomicrobial infections with pyogenic bacteria (eg, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella
pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Lung abscesses can also result from secondary
infection of pre-existing lung cavities, bronchial obstruction, septic embolization, or direct
extension from local infections such as empyema.
The clinical features, pathogenesis, evaluation, and treatment of lung abscesses will be
reviewed here. Aspiration pneumonia, which may precede the development of a lung
abscess, is discussed separately. (See "Aspiration pneumonia in adults".)
DEFINITIONS
● Primary lung abscesses result from direct infection of the pulmonary parenchyma in an
otherwise healthy person. Most result from aspiration and, less commonly, from
infection with pyogenic bacteria (eg, S. aureus).
The terms "necrotizing pneumonia" or "lung gangrene" are used to describe pneumonia that
is complicated by necrosis and numerous small abscesses [2].
PATHOGENESIS
Most lung abscesses arise as a complication of aspiration that leads to one or more localized
areas of pneumonia, followed by necrosis and cavitation. Other mechanisms include
embolization (blood–borne), direct extension, endobronchial obstruction, or infection of lung
cysts.
MICROBIOLOGY
● Aspiration — Lung abscesses that result from aspiration are typically polymicrobial,
reflecting oral and gingival flora. The most commonly isolated pathogens are
microaerophilic Streptococci and anaerobes. The most common anaerobes include
Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, Bacteroides (usually not B. fragilis), and Fusobacterium [9-
18]. Common streptococci include Streptococcus anginosis and other members of the
Streptococcus milleri group and oral streptococci such as Streptococcus mitis. These
organisms may be a part of a polymicrobial infection or may be the sole pathogens.
The bacteriology of lung abscess may be subject to geographic variability. For example,
in a retrospective evaluation of 90 Taiwanese adults with lung abscess, Gram-negative
bacilli (especially K. pneumoniae) accounted for 36 percent of isolates (see "Clinical
features, diagnosis, and treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection") [16]. Other
organisms included anaerobes (34 percent), Gram-positive cocci (26 percent), and Gram-
positive bacilli (4 percent).
CLINICAL FEATURES
The clinical features of a lung abscess are typically non-specific and mimic those of
pneumonia, albeit with more subacute presentation. It is typically the identification of one or
more cavities filled with fluid or with an air-fluid interface on chest imaging that raises the
suspicion for lung abscess.
Symptoms and signs — The presenting signs and symptoms include fever and chills (80
percent), productive cough (often putrid, sour-tasting; 55 to 90 percent), dyspnea (10
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/lung-abscess-in-adults/print?search=abscess pulmonary&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~127&usag… 4/32
18/2/2021 Lung abscess in adults - UpToDate
percent), chest pain when the pleural space is involved (20 to 35 percent), and hemoptysis
(10 percent) [17,22,30-32]. Since abscesses of the lung are usually chronic, unlike
pneumonia, most patients have symptoms that evolve over weeks to months. Systemic
symptoms such as night sweats, weight loss, anorexia, and fatigue may also be present
[12,13,33].
More rapid presentations with fulminant disease (eg, shock) may also occur with acute
abscesses (eg, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae), particularly in those who are
immunocompromised, and those with septic emboli.
Typical findings on physical examination are fever, gingival crevice disease (eg, gingivitis,
dental caries), associated conditions that reduce consciousness or cause dysphagia (eg,
facial or tongue weakness, bulbar speech, neurologic disease with deconditioning). Chest
auscultation may be normal or may demonstrate egophony or increased vocal fremitus,
reflecting consolidation, particularly if the abscess is large and subpleural.
Chest radiograph — Lung abscesses are often visible on the chest radiograph, manifest as a
fluid-filled space, typically with an air-fluid interface, within an area of consolidation, mass,
or nodule ( image 1 and image 2), although more subtle forms of cavitation may only
be appreciated on chest computed tomography (see 'Chest computed tomography' below).
Most often, lung abscesses are unilateral [30]. Because most cases are due to aspiration,
abscesses are frequently located in a segment of the lung that is dependent in the
recumbent position (eg, the superior segment of a lower lobe or a posterior segment of the
upper lobes), or in the right middle lobe if aspiration occurs in the upright or prone position
[30].
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
Clinical assessment
● The medical history should include questions about risk factors, such as dental pain or
procedures, episodes of altered consciousness, neurologic disease, esophageal disease,
alcohol or injection drug use, symptoms of extrapulmonary infection, history of immune
deficiency or bronchiectasis, and prior similar episodes. Patients should also be asked
about the timing of symptom onset, the presence of associated symptoms (eg,
pharyngeal or neck pain, difficulty swallowing or coughing after swallowing, weight loss,
night sweats), and smoking history since these may provide clues to the underlying
etiology or organisms.
● Physical examination should include thorough examination of the oral cavity for
halitosis, gingivitis, tonsillar enlargement, carious, loose, or tender teeth, and neck
masses or tenderness. The patient should be asked to swallow a few sips of water to
screen for dysphagia. (See "Complications of stroke: An overview", section on
'Dysphagia'.)
● Routine laboratory tests such as complete and differential blood count, chemistries, and
liver and kidney function tests should be obtained. Laboratory findings are generally
non-specific and include leukocytosis and anemia of chronic disease.
● For patients who are immunocompromised, the potential causes of infection are
broader and additional testing is often needed. (See "Epidemiology of pulmonary
infections in immunocompromised patients" and "Approach to the
immunocompromised patient with fever and pulmonary infiltrates".)
● Patients with concomitant skin, nasal, kidney, or neurologic disease that suggests
granulomatosis with polyangiitis should be tested for antineutrophil cytoplasmic
antibodies (ANCA). (See 'Differential diagnosis' below and "Granulomatosis with
polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: Respiratory tract involvement".)
Microbiologic testing — All patients should have two sets of blood cultures for both aerobic
and anaerobic culture. Additional cultures from any suspected source is also appropriate (eg,
intravascular catheter or wound). Sputum should be obtained for Gram stain and culture,
ideally before antibiotics are started; however, antimicrobial therapy should not be withheld
for those with acute presentations such as shock. For patients who do not expectorate
sputum, bronchoscopic sampling and/or percutaneous needle aspiration or (rarely) biopsy
may be indicated. (See 'Additional testing' below.)
A micro-organism on Gram stain that is heavy in culture is often a pathogen. However, care
must be exercised in interpreting the results, particularly when antimicrobials have already
been started, since most sputum samples yield deceptive contaminants from upper airway
flora that do not need to be treated (eg, Corynebacterium spp) and may not reveal the
presence of anaerobes that do need to be treated [34]. Regardless of culture results, a putrid
A CT can also distinguish between a parenchymal lesion and a pleural collection (eg,
parapneumonic effusion or empyema), which are managed very differently ( image 3) and
determine whether the abscess is due to an infected cyst or bulla, underlying congenital
lesion (eg, infected sequestration), airway obstruction (eg, tumor, inhaled foreign body), or
sub-diaphragmatic or pleural infection. Last, if surgery is indicated, CT facilitates decision-
making regarding resection. (See 'Differential diagnosis' below and "Imaging of pleural
effusions in adults", section on 'Empyema' and 'Surgical intervention' below.)
Additional testing — Additional testing may be warranted for patients who are unable to
produce sputum, have an atypical presentation (eg, suspected cancer, noninfectious
granulomatous disease), are immunocompromised, or do not respond to empiric antibiotics.
As an example, bronchoscopy may be pursued more quickly in patients who are unable to
raise sputum or have sputum that is not putrid and those who are at increased risk for
opportunistic organisms due to immune deficiency or underlying lung disease ( table 1),
as early diagnosis and specific therapy of opportunistic infections are the cornerstone of
successful management in such patients.
When performing bronchoscopy, the clinician should evaluate the airways in the areas of
lung abscesses for endobronchial stenosis, foreign bodies, and lesions suspicious for
malignancy that may be responsible for or mimic lung abscess. Samples of secretions
observed in the affected region of the lung can be aspirated directly or by gentle washing of
the area. However, caution is required as aggressive suctioning and sampling, including
brushing, bronchoalveolar lavage, and transbronchial biopsy of the cavity, can cause sudden
spillage of the abscess contents and acute respiratory distress syndrome [38].
Samples should be sent for cytology, routine Gram stain and culture, and special stains for
Nocardia, Actinomyces, fungi, Pneumocystis, mycobacteria, and antigen testing for
galactomannan. Visible airway lesions should be biopsied or brushed per usual practice.
Further details on bronchoscopy are provided separately. (See "Flexible bronchoscopy in
adults: Overview" and "Flexible bronchoscopy in adults: Indications and contraindications"
and "Flexible bronchoscopy in adults: Preparation, procedural technique, and
complications".)
Obtaining samples using a protected specimen brush and subjecting them to quantitative
cultures may reduce the chances of oral contamination and provide a better idea of the
degree of growth; however, this approach is inconsistently available, costly, and may still be
of low yield for anaerobic pathogens.
Other
DIAGNOSIS
The diagnosis of lung abscess is a clinical one, based on the radiographic appearance (most
often one or more cavities with an air-fluid interface), supportive clinical features and
microbiologic tests, and response to antimicrobial therapy. Clinicians should understand that
in many cases, (approximately half), the offending pathogen is not isolated [17,18].
For patients with lung abscess without a clear predisposing factor, post-diagnostic testing
may be appropriate to assess for dysphagia, episodes of altered consciousness, underlying
bronchiectasis, or immune deficits.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
The key processes to consider in the differential diagnosis of lung abscess are other causes
of a fluid or air-fluid filled mass in the lung parenchyma (eg, lung cancer, granulomatosis
with polyangiitis [GPA], infected lung cyst or bulla, hydatid cyst, or superinfected fungal or
mycobacterial cavity) ( table 2). Additionally, an empyema with an air-fluid interface can
mimic a lung abscess on conventional chest radiographs. While less common in adults,
intralobar pulmonary sequestrations can develop abscesses.
● Malignancy – Primary lung cancer and metastatic cancer can present with cavitary
lesions that mimic lung abscess or become superinfected. Additionally, endobronchial
cancer can cause a postobstructive lung abscess. A solitary thick-walled cavity (wall >15
mm diameter) without surrounding consolidation is concerning for lung cancer.
Diagnostic cytology and/or biopsy are warranted if the patient does not have systemic
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/lung-abscess-in-adults/print?search=abscess pulmonary&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~127&usag… 9/32
18/2/2021 Lung abscess in adults - UpToDate
● Hydatid cyst – For patients with travel or residence in an area endemic for Echinococcus,
computed tomography (CT) imaging can identify single or multilocular cysts that may
have an air crescent sign, germinative membranes floating in cyst fluid (water lily sign),
or are empty. Liver cysts are also present in about 20 percent of patients with lung cysts
and provide an etiologic clue. Peripheral blood eosinophilia is uncommon and serologic
tests are variably helpful. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of echinococcosis".)
TREATMENT
The role of postural drainage and chest percussion (chest physiotherapy) is less clear; it has
been used with the rationale that it would facilitate intrabronchial drainage [30]. However,
efficacy has not been demonstrated and fatal cases of intrabronchial abscess rupture have
been reported. We reserve cautious chest physiotherapy for patients with cystic fibrosis and
noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis who are on a routine program of bronchial hygiene.
For patients with suspected lung abscess from aspiration, empiric intravenous (IV) regimens
should penetrate the lung parenchyma and target both strict anaerobes and microaerophilic
streptococci.
● For patients who are allergic to penicillin, clindamycin (600 mg IV every eight hours,
followed by 150 to 300 mg orally four times daily), moxifloxacin 400 mg orally daily
[58,59], or combination therapy with levofloxacin (750 mg orally daily) plus
metronidazole (500 mg orally three times daily) are alternatives [60,61]. If a patient fails
to respond to clindamycin alone then Gram-negative coverage should be added with a
quinolone or cephalosporin.
● For suspected methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), the agents of choice are cefazolin
(2 g IV every eight hours), nafcillin (2 g IV every four hours), or oxacillin (2 g IV every four
hours).
Duration of antibiotics — In general, we switch from IV to oral agents once the patient has
defervesced and becomes clinically stable; for some patients this takes a few days while in
others it may be one to three weeks. Appropriate oral regimens will depend upon the
identified or suspected infecting pathogens. For patients with a mixed anaerobic and
streptococcal infection, amoxicillin-clavulanate is an appropriate regimen [67], but the choice
of regimen should be guided by the causative pathogen(s) and susceptibility results when
available.
The optimal total duration of therapy (IV plus oral) is unknown; reported ranges include 21 to
48 days [1,17]. Some experts treat for three weeks as a standard and others treat based
upon the response. Our practice is to continue antibiotic treatment until chest imaging
(preferably computed tomography [CT]) shows a small, stable residual lesion or is clear. This
generally requires several weeks of treatment, most of which can be accomplished with an
oral regimen on an outpatient basis.
Response to therapy — Most patients are followed clinically, but repeat imaging is prudent
for new onset or recurrent fevers, chest pain, hemoptysis, or dyspnea and for failure to
improve.
Patients with aspiration-related lung abscesses usually show clinical improvement with
decreased fever and leukocytosis within three to four days after beginning antibiotic
treatment. Defervescence is expected in 7 to 10 days [9,10,68-70]. The disappearance of
putrid sputum may take longer.
Persistent fevers beyond one to two weeks may indicate delayed response, and such
patients should undergo further diagnostic tests to better define the underlying anatomy
and microbiology of the infection; typically, another chest CT is performed to look for
progression of the abscess, development of complications (eg, empyema or new abscesses),
or an underlying reason that may not have been picked up on the initial CT scan. In addition,
further respiratory sampling via flexible bronchoscopy is usually indicated. (See 'Additional
testing' above.)
● Conditions that mimic an abscess such as an infected cyst or empyema. (See 'Differential
diagnosis' above.)
● Other causes of persistent fever, such as drug fever or C. difficile–associated colitis. (See
"Drug fever" and "Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection in adults:
Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)
Patients who fail to improve by 7 to 10 days despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy may
need a drainage procedure or surgery. (See 'Failure of antimicrobial therapy' below.)
Transthoracic drainage procedures carry a small risk of infecting the pleural space. In
addition, they are also associated with a small risk of hemorrhage and pneumothorax.
One of the risks associated with bronchoscopic drainage is spillage of infected material
to other parts of the lung. Intracavitary fibrinolytic therapy is not recommended due to
the potential development of a bronchopleural fistula. This procedure is not universally
Factors that may contribute to a slow response or no response are obstruction of the
bronchus, an extremely large size abscess, and abscesses involving antibiotic-resistant
organisms, such as P. aeruginosa.
The usual procedure in such cases is a lobectomy or pneumonectomy but small peripheral
abscesses may be amenable to segmentectomy or wedge resection [84]. Video-assisted
thoracic surgery (VATS) is the procedure of choice and attention should be paid to removing
all infected material in order to avoid stump infection and resultant bronchopleural fistula
[85].
Mortality with surgery is as high as 15 to 20 percent although the high mortality rate likely
reflects the severity of lung abscess in patients referred for lung surgery as well as their
underlying conditions, in addition to the risk of surgery itself [86,87].
OUTCOMES
Patients with primary lung abscess (about 60 percent overall) with typical aspiration-related
lung abscesses, including those with alcohol or injection drug use, generally do well with
antibiotic treatment with cure rates of 90 to 95 percent [1,10,17,22,30,73,88]. Patients who
require surgery, are immunocompromised, or have malignancy or irreversible bronchial
obstruction have higher mortality rates [89]. Associated disease in the host is an important
factor in determining the outcome of a lung abscess.
In one illustrative series of 252 patients with aspiration lung abscess, antibiotic therapy
(mainly penicillin and clindamycin) was successful in 200 [30]. Drainage of the abscess was
performed in 6 patients, drainage of empyema in 24, and pulmonary resection in 22. There
were 10 deaths.
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Hemoptysis".)
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the
Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th
grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have
about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview
and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are
longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th
grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are
comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to
print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles
on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
● Aspiration is the most common cause of lung abscesses, accounting for approximately
80 percent of cases. Less commonly, lung abscesses arise as complications of
● Lung abscesses that result from aspiration are typically polymicrobial, composed of the
oral flora that inhabits the gingival crevices. This flora typically includes microaerophilic
streptococci and anaerobes (Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, Bacteroides [usually not B.
fragilis]), and Fusobacterium spp ( table 4), but Gram-negative organisms are also seen,
particularly in immunocompromised patients and patients with multiple comorbidities.
(See 'Microbiologic testing' above.)
● Classically, the onset of illness associated with lung abscesses is indolent, with
symptoms arising over weeks to months. Typical symptoms include cough (often with
putrid-smelling sputum), dyspnea, and/or chest pain. Systemic symptoms can include
fever, chills, night sweats and weight loss. (See 'Clinical features' above.)
● For most patients, the diagnosis can be made based on radiographic findings in a
patient with compatible clinical features (eg, aspiration). Chest radiograph typically
shows a thick-walled cavity with an air-fluid level, with or without a surrounding opacity (
image 1 and image 2). We typically obtain a chest computed tomography (CT) to
better characterize the extent and possible cause of lung abscesses ( image 1 and
image 2). (See 'Diagnosis' above.)
● The differential diagnosis includes other forms of infectious cavitary lung disease (eg,
necrotizing pneumonia, nocardiosis, tuberculosis, septic emboli) and noninfectious
cavitary lung disease (eg, malignancy, pulmonary vasculitides) ( table 2). (See
'Differential diagnosis' above.)
● In all patients, we obtain sputum Gram stain, sputum culture, and blood cultures to help
direct therapy. More invasive testing (eg, bronchoscopy or percutaneous needle
aspiration of the abscess) is usually reserved for cases in which there is diagnostic
uncertainty, clinical instability, suspicion for unusual pathogen, and/or when patients
are not responding to empiric therapy. (See 'Diagnostic evaluation' above.)
● For patients with suspected lung abscess from aspiration, empiric antibiotics should
penetrate the lung parenchyma and target both strict anaerobes and facultatively
anaerobic streptococci. (See 'Initial empiric antibiotics' above.)
● Modifications to this regimen (eg, broader empiric therapy) may be needed for patients
with clinical instability, immunocompromised patients, and/or when specific pathogens
are suspected based on clinical or radiographic features (eg, coverage for S. aureus or
Pseudomonas in a patient with necrotizing pneumonia). (See 'Initial empiric antibiotics'
above.)
● Most patients with a lung abscess caused by aspiration will recover with antibiotic
treatment alone. The duration of treatment varies based on clinical and radiographic
response. Generally, we assess response after 7 to 10 days of antibiotic treatment.
Those who are improving generally require two to three weeks of treatment. (See
'Duration of antibiotics' above and 'Response to therapy' above.)
● For patients who do not improve despite antibiotic treatment, abscess drainage is
indicated. When the abscess is accessible percutaneously, we prefer transthoracic
drainage over transbronchial catheter drainage because it is technically easier and the
risk of endobronchial spread of infection is less. Surgical resection is rarely necessary
and reserved for those with abscesses that cannot be drained or do not respond to
drainage with less invasive approaches. (See 'Failure of antimicrobial therapy' above.)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are saddened by the death of John Bartlett, MD, who passed away in January 2021.
UpToDate wishes to acknowledge Dr. Bartlett's past work as an author for this topic.
REFERENCES
2. Pennza PT. Aspiration pneumonia, necrotizing pneumonia, and lung abscess. Emerg
Med Clin North Am 1989; 7:279.
3. Chung G, Goetz MB. Anaerobic Infections of the Lung. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2000; 2:238.
7. Edwards P, Brener M, Isles A, Kapur N. Staphylococcal lung abscess in a child with cystic
fibrosis: Case report & review of literature. Respir Med Case Rep 2020; 29:101024.
8. Canny GJ, Marcotte JE, Levison H. Lung abscess in cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1986; 41:221.
9. Bartlett JG, Gorbach SL, Tally FP, Finegold SM. Bacteriology and treatment of primary
lung abscess. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974; 109:510.
10. Bartlett JG. Treatment of anaerobic pleuropulmonary infections. Ann Intern Med 1975;
83:376.
11. Beerens H, Tahon-Castel M.. Infections humaines a bacteries anaerobies non toxigenes.,
Presses Academiques Europeennes, Brussels 1965. p.91.
12. Bartlett JG, Finegold SM. Anaerobic infections of the lung and pleural space. Am Rev
Respir Dis 1974; 110:56.
13. Clinical conferences at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: lung abscess. Johns Hopkins Med J
1982; 150:141.
14. Perlman LV, Lerner E, D'Esopo N. Clinical classification and analysis of 97 cases of lung
abscess. Am Rev Respir Dis 1969; 99:390.
15. Bartlett JG. Anaerobic bacterial infections of the lung. Chest 1987; 91:901.
16. Wang JL, Chen KY, Fang CT, et al. Changing bacteriology of adult community-acquired
lung abscess in Taiwan: Klebsiella pneumoniae versus anaerobes. Clin Infect Dis 2005;
40:915.
17. Takayanagi N, Kagiyama N, Ishiguro T, et al. Etiology and outcome of community-
acquired lung abscess. Respiration 2010; 80:98.
18. Mukae H, Noguchi S, Naito K, et al. The Importance of Obligate Anaerobes and the
Streptococcus anginosus Group in Pulmonary Abscess: A Clone Library Analysis Using
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid. Respiration 2016; 92:80.
19. FISHER AM, TREVER RW, CURTIN JA, et al. Staphylococcal pneumonia; a review of 21
cases in adults. N Engl J Med 1958; 258:919.
21. Bullowa JG, Chess J, Friedman NJ. Pneumonia due to Bacillus friedlanderi. Arch Intern
Med 1937; 60:735.
22. Mohapatra MM, Rajaram M, Mallick A. Clinical, Radiological and Bacteriological Profile of
Lung Abscess - An Observational Hospital Based Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci
2018; 6:1642.
23. Williams DM, Krick JA, Remington JS. Pulmonary infection in the compromised host: part
I. Am Rev Respir Dis 1976; 114:359.
24. Keefer CS, Ingelfinger FJ, Spink WW. Significance of hemolytic streptococci bacteremia:
Study of 246 patients. Arch Intern Med 1937; 60:1084.
25. Howe C, Sampath A, Spotnitz M. The pseudomallei group: a review. J Infect Dis 1971;
124:598.
26. Peetermans WE, Van Wijngaerden E, Van Eldere J, Verhaegen J. Melioidosis brain and
lung abscess after travel to Sri Lanka. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 28:921.
27. Senécal JL, St-Antoine P, Béliveau C. Legionella pneumophila lung abscess in a patient
with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med Sci 1987; 293:309.
28. La Scola B, Michel G, Raoult D. Isolation of Legionella pneumophila by centrifugation of
shell vial cell cultures from multiple liver and lung abscesses. J Clin Microbiol 1999;
37:785.
29. Leatherman JW, Iber C, Davies SF. Cavitation in bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia.
Causal role of mixed infection with anaerobic bacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 129:317.
30. Moreira Jda S, Camargo Jde J, Felicetti JC, et al. Lung abscess: analysis of 252 consecutive
cases diagnosed between 1968 and 2004. J Bras Pneumol 2006; 32:136.
31. Neild JE, Eykyn SJ, Phillips I. Lung abscess and empyema. Q J Med 1985; 57:875.
32. Jerng JS, Hsueh PR, Teng LJ, et al. Empyema thoracis and lung abscess caused by
viridans streptococci. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156:1508.
33. Stark DD, Federle MP, Goodman PC, et al. Differentiating lung abscess and empyema:
radiography and computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 141:163.
34. Bartlett JG. Diagnostic accuracy of transtracheal aspiration bacteriologic studies. Am Rev
Respir Dis 1977; 115:777.
35. Williford ME, Godwin JD. Computed tomography of lung abscess and empyema. Radiol
Clin North Am 1983; 21:575.
36. Takaki M, Tsuyama N, Ikeda E, et al. The Transbronchial Drainage of a Lung Abscess
Using Endobronchial Ultrasonography with a Modified Guide Sheath. Intern Med 2019;
58:97.
37. McDill H, Hassan M, Dack G, et al. To drain or not to drain? Abscess or empyema? Thorax
2020.
38. Hammer DL, Aranda CP, Galati V, Adams FV. Massive intrabronchial aspiration of
contents of pulmonary abscess after fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1978; 74:306.
39. Zhang M, Zhang XY, Chen YB. Primary pulmonary actinomycosis: a retrospective
analysis of 145 cases in mainland China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2017; 21:825.
40. Vargas Puerto A, Peña Griñan N, Muñoz Lucena F, et al. [Usefulness of transthoracic
pulmonary aspiration biopsy in lung abscess secondary to neoplasm]. Arch
Bronconeumol 1996; 32:132.
41. Cheng YF, Hsieh YK, Wang BY, et al. Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis complicated
with multiple lung abscesses and thoracic empyema as different pathogens: a case
report. J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 14:41.
42. Garbati MA, Tleyjeh IM, Abba AA. Complicated community-acquired Staphylococcus
endocarditis and multiple lung abscesses: case report and review of literature. Case Rep
Infect Dis 2011; 2011:981316.
43. Fujino T, Amari Y, Mohri M, et al. MRSA tricuspid valve infective endocarditis with
multiple embolic lung abscesses treated by combination therapy of vancomycin,
rifampicin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. J Cardiol 2009; 53:146.
44. Que YA, Muller O, Liaudet L. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Rapid resolution of
massive lung abscesses complicating tricuspid-valve endocarditis. Circulation 2006;
114:e523.
45. Bartlett JG. The technique of transtracheal aspiration. J Crit Illn 1986; 1:43.
46. Bandt PD, Blank N, Castellino RA. Needle diagnosis of pneumonitis. Value in high-risk
patients. JAMA 1972; 220:1578.
47. Pratter MR, Irwin RS. Transtracheal aspiration. Guidelines for safety. Chest 1979; 76:518.
48. Russell B, Mohan S, Chahal R, et al. Prognostic Significance of Cavitary Lung Nodules in
Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Wegener's): A Clinical Imaging Study of 225 Patients.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70:1082.
49. Cohen JR, Amorosa JK, Smith PR. The air-fluid level in cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis.
Radiology 1978; 127:315.
50. Barnes PF, Verdegem TD, Vachon LA, et al. Chest roentgenogram in pulmonary
tuberculosis. New data on an old test. Chest 1988; 94:316.
53. Gompelmann D, Eberhardt R, Heussel CP, et al. Lung sequestration: a rare cause for
pulmonary symptoms in adulthood. Respiration 2011; 82:445.
54. Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Warren Y, et al. In vitro activity of gemifloxacin (SB 265805)
against anaerobes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43:2231.
55. Finegold SM, George WL, Mulligan ME. Anaerobic infections. Part II. Dis Mon 1985; 31:1.
56. Finegold SM, Rolfe RD. Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Diagn Microbiol
Infect Dis 1983; 1:33.
57. Appelbaum PC, Spangler SK, Jacobs MR. Beta-lactamase production and susceptibilities
to amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin,
imipenem, and metronidazole of 320 non-Bacteroides fragilis Bacteroides isolates and
129 fusobacteria from 28 U.S. centers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34:1546.
58. Ott SR, Allewelt M, Lorenz J, et al. Moxifloxacin vs ampicillin/sulbactam in aspiration
pneumonia and primary lung abscess. Infection 2008; 36:23.
59. Polenakovik H, Burdette SD, Polenakovik S. Moxifloxacin is efficacious for treatment of
community-acquired lung abscesses in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:764.
60. Levison ME, Mangura CT, Lorber B, et al. Clindamycin compared with penicillin for the
treatment of anaerobic lung abscess. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98:466.
61. Gudiol F, Manresa F, Pallares R, et al. Clindamycin vs penicillin for anaerobic lung
infections. High rate of penicillin failures associated with penicillin-resistant Bacteroides
melaninogenicus. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150:2525.
62. Wunderink RG, Niederman MS, Kollef MH, et al. Linezolid in methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, controlled study. Clin
Infect Dis 2012; 54:621.
63. Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, et al. Activity of ceftaroline and epidemiologic trends
in Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from 43 medical centers in the United States
in 2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55:4154.
64. Cosimi RA, Beik N, Kubiak DW, Johnson JA. Ceftaroline for Severe Methicillin-Resistant
Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Systematic Review. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;
4:ofx084.
65. Bassetti M, Russo A, Cilloniz C, et al. Ceftaroline for severe community-acquired
pneumonia: A real-world two-centre experience in Italy and Spain. Int J Antimicrob
Agents 2020; 55:105921.
66. DeLeo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. Community-associated meticillin-
resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 2010; 375:1557.
68. SCHWEPPE HI, KNOWLES JH, KANE L. Lung abscess. An analysis of the Massachusets
General Hospital cases from 1943 through 1956. N Engl J Med 1961; 265:1039.
69. Shafron RD, Tate CF Jr. Lung abscess: A five-year evaluation. Dis Chest 1968; 53:12.
70. Pohlson EC, McNamara JJ, Char C, Kurata L. Lung abscess: a changing pattern of the
disease. Am J Surg 1985; 150:97.
71. Herth F, Ernst A, Becker HD. Endoscopic drainage of lung abscesses: technique and
outcome. Chest 2005; 127:1378.
77. Vainrub B, Musher DM, Guinn GA, et al. Percutaneous drainage of lung abscess. Am Rev
Respir Dis 1978; 117:153.
78. Weissberg D. Percutaneous drainage of lung abscess. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;
87:308.
79. Mengoli L. Giant lung abscess treated by tube thoracostomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1985; 90:186.
80. Schmitt GS, Ohar JM, Kanter KR, Naunheim KS. Indwelling transbronchial catheter
drainage of pulmonary abscess. Ann Thorac Surg 1988; 45:43.
81. Rowe LD, Keane WM, Jafek BW, Atkins JP Jr. Transbronchial drainage of pulmonary
abscesses with the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Laryngoscope 1979; 89:122.
85. Sun Y, Hou L, Xie H, et al. Wedge resection for localized infectious lesions: high
margin/lesion ratio guaranteed operational safety. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6:1173.
86. Lee CH, Liu YH, Lu MS, et al. Pneumonotomy: an alternative way for managing lung
abscess. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77:852.
87. Schweigert M, Dubecz A, Beron M, et al. Surgical therapy for necrotizing pneumonia and
lung gangrene. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 61:636.
88. Yazbeck MF, Dahdel M, Kalra A, et al. Lung abscess: update on microbiology and
management. Am J Ther 2014; 21:217.
89. Hirshberg B, Sklair-Levi M, Nir-Paz R, et al. Factors predicting mortality of patients with
lung abscess. Chest 1999; 115:746.
Topic 7030 Version 22.0
GRAPHICS
Common Uncommon
Bacteria Bacteria
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Rhodococcus equi
Enterobacteriaceae Legionella spp
Nocardia spp Mycobacteria
Anaerobic bacteria and microaerophilic streptococci (eg, M. avium complex
Streptococcus milleri)
Other nontuberculous
Staphylococcus aureus mycobacteria
Mycobacteria Fungi
M. tuberculosis Agents of mucormycosis
M. kansasii Blastomyces dermatitidis
Fungi Pneumocystis jirovecii
Cryptococcus spp (formerly P. carinii)
Aspergillus spp
Histoplasma capsulatum
Lung abscess
Postanterior (A) and lateral (B) chest radiographs show dense right
upper airspace consolidation. Contrast-enhanced computed
tomography (CT) scan (C) demonstrates large focal area of decreased
attentuation with rim enhancement (arrow) characteristic of lung
abscess. Postanterior (D) and lateral (E) chest radiographs three weeks
later show decreased size of lung abscess and development of
cavitation with fluid level (arrows). The patient was a 43-year-old
woman with lung abscess secondary to Haemophilus aphrophilus.
Reproduced with permission from: Müller NL, Franquet T, Lee KS, Silva CIS.
Bacterial pneumonia. In: Imaging of pulmonary infections, Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2007. Copyright © 2007 Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins. www.lww.com.
Graphic 54525 Version 11.0
Posterior (A) and lateral (B) chest radiographs show large loculated right
pleural effusion (arrows). Cross-sectional (C) contrast-enhanced
multidetector computed tomography (CT) image and sagittal reformation
(D) demonstrate the extent of the loculated effusion, pleural thickening,
and enhancement (arrows). The patient was a 44-year-old man and an
intravenous drug user. He had no radiologic evidence of the septic
embolism.
Reproduced with permission from: Müller NL, Franquet T, Lee KS, Silva CIS.
Bacterial pneumonia. In: Imaging of pulmonary infections, Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2007. Copyright © 2007 Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins. www.lww.com.
Graphic 82576 Version 12.0
Infections
Necrotizing infections
Anaerobic bacteria, often mixed with aerobic and microaerophilic streptococci
Other bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Legionella spp, Haemophilus influenzae type B, Nocardia spp, Actinomyces spp,
Burkholderia pseudomallei
Mycobacteria
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. avium, M. kansasii, other nontuberculous mycobacteria
Fungi
Aspergillus spp, Coccidioides spp, Histoplasma spp, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Cryptococcus
spp, agents of mucormycosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii
Parasites
Echinococcus, Entamoeba histolytica, Paragonimus westermani
Empyema with air-fluid level (hydropneumothorax)
Septic pulmonary emboli (eg, tricuspid valve endocarditis, intravascular catheters,
intravenous drug use, Lemierre syndrome)
Non-infectious diseases
Pulmonary embolism with infarction
Vasculitis (eg, granulomatosis with polyangiitis)
Neoplasm (eg, bronchogenic cancer, lymphoma, and metastatic head and neck,
bladder, colon, pancreatic, and uterine cancer).
Pulmonary sequestration
Bullae or cysts with air fluid level
Bronchiectasis
Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia
Sarcoidosis
Rheumatoid nodules
Pulmonary Langerhans histiocytosis
Foreign body aspiration
Loading dose (for patients with known or Load 20 to 35 mg/kg (based on actual body
suspected severe Staphylococcus aureus weight, rounded to the nearest 250 mg
infection) ¶ increment; not to exceed 3000 mg). Within this
range, we use a higher dose for critically ill
patients; we use a lower dose for patients who
are obese and/or are receiving vancomycin via
continuous infusion.
Initial maintenance dose and interval Typically 15 to 20 mg/kg every 8 to 12 hours
for most patients (based on actual body
weight, rounded to the nearest 250 mg
increment).
In general, the approach to establishing the
vancomycin dose/interval is guided by a
nomogram. Δ
Subsequent dose and interval adjustments Based on AUC-guided (preferred for severe
infection) [1] or trough-guided serum
concentration monitoring. ◊
AUC: area under the 24-hour time-concentration curve.
* Refer to the UpToDate topic on vancomycin dosing for management of patients with abnormal
kidney function.
¶ For patients with known or suspected severe S. aureus infection, we suggest administration of a
loading dose to reduce the likelihood of suboptimal initial vancomycin exposure. Severe S. aureus
infections include (but are not limited to) bacteremia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint
infection, pneumonia warranting hospitalization, infection involving the central nervous system, or
infection causing critical illness.
Δ If possible, the nomogram should be developed and validated at the institution where it is used, to
best reflect the regional patient population. Refer to UpToDate topic on vancomycin dosing for
sample nomogram.
◊ Refer to the UpToDate topic on vancomycin dosing for discussion of AUC-guided and trough-guided
vancomycin dosing. For patients with nonsevere infection who receive vancomycin for <3 days (in the
setting of stable kidney function and absence of other risk factors for altered vancomycin kinetics),
vancomycin concentration monitoring is often omitted; the value of such monitoring prior to
achieving steady state (usually around treatment day 2 to 3) is uncertain.
Reference:
1. Rybak MJ, Le J, Lodise TP, et al. Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin for Serious Methicillin-Resistant
Staphylococcus Aureus Infections: A Revised Consensus Guideline and Review by the American Society
of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious
Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2020;
77:835.
Contributor Disclosures
Michael Klompas, MD, MPH Nothing to disclose Stephen B Calderwood, MD Equity Ownership:
Pulmatrix [Infectious diseases]. Consultant/Advisory Boards: Day Zero Diagnostics [Whole genome
sequencing for microbial identification and determination of antimicrobial susceptibility]. Helen
Hollingsworth, MD Nothing to disclose Sheila Bond, MD Nothing to disclose
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these
are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for
references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all
authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.