Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mapping Primary Health Care Renewall in South America
Mapping Primary Health Care Renewall in South America
3, 261–267
doi:10.1093/fampra/cmw013
Advance Access publication 21 March 2016
*Correspondence to Naydú Acosta Ramírez, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Calle 18
No. 118-250, Cali, Colombia; E-mail: naydu.acosta@javerianacali.edu.co
Abstract
Background. Primary health care (PHC) renewal processes are currently ongoing in South America
(SA), but their characteristics have not been systematically described.
Objective. The study aimed to describe and contrast the PHC approaches being implemented in
SA to provide knowledge of current conceptions, models and challenges.
Methods. This multiple case study used a qualitative approach with technical visits to health
ministries in order to apply key-informant interviews of 129 PHC national policy makers and 53
local managers, as well as field observation of 57 selected PHC providers and document analysis,
using a common matrix for data collection and analysis. PHC approaches were analysed by
triangulating sources using the following categories: PHC philosophy and conception, service
provision organization, intersectoral collaboration and social participation.
Results. Primary health care models were identified in association with existing health system
types and the dynamics of PHC renewal in each country. A neo-selective model was found in
three countries where coverage is segmented by private and public regimes; here, individual and
collective care are separated. A comprehensive approach similar to the Alma-Ata model was found
in seven countries where the public sector predominates and individual, family and community
care are coordinated under the responsibility of the same health care team.
Conclusions. The process of implementing a renewed PHC approach is affected by how health
systems are funded and organized. Both models face many obstacles. In addition, care system
organization, intersectoral coordination and social participation are weak in most of the countries.
Key words. Comprehensive health care, health care reform, primary health care, social participation, South America, universal coverage.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
261
For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
262 Family Practice, 2016, Vol. 33, No. 3
guaranteed to all the world’s peoples. It set out to establish a concept intersectoral cooperation (interaction with other public policy sec-
of primary health care (PHC) strategy framed by a model in which tors at the national level to address the social determinants of health)
care is comprehensive and inseparable from economic, social and and social participation (forms of user representation and participa-
cultural development, and involves health promotion, social par- tion in PHC). Based on the qualitative analysis process by triangulat-
ticipation and intersectoral cooperation to address the social deter- ing among sources (17), the results contrast the experiences of each
minants of health. Nonetheless, in the 1980s and 1990s, in many country and identify common elements in PHC implementation in
countries focalized, selective models of PHC delivered by vertical relation to existing health system types and segmentation of popu-
programs targeting vulnerable population groups or specific health lation coverage. Another study describes other categories and vari-
problems were developed. Since the 1990s, encouraged and financed ables examined in the PHC mapping in the countries of SA, such as
by multilateral finance agencies, some countries have carried out the responsibilities and attributions of levels of government in PHC
health sector reforms with a market-economy approach centred implementation, funding and intercultural approaches (18).
on competition and cost control, managed care, health insurance, Mapping in the 12 countries was coordinated and funded by
separation of individual and collective health risk management and the South American Institute of Government in Health (ISAGS), an
limited health benefit packages or focused insurance for marginal international organization of the Health Council of the Union of
Table 1. Elements of primary health care model (PHC philosophy and conception in health policies in South American countries)
Argentina (2004) Health is considered a right, the responsibility of the state. Emphasis is on comprehensive care, disease prevention, health
promotion and rehabilitation, accessibility and health service decentralization. This gives the framework for various initia-
tives, including the ‘Remediar’ and ‘Médicos Comunitarios’ (PMC) programs (5).
Bolivia (2008) With its principles of community participation, intersectoral collaboration, interculturalism and comprehensive care, the
‘Modelo de Salud Familiar Comunitario Intercultural’ (SAFCI) comprises the elements of comprehensive PHC (6).
Brazil (2006, 2011) The ‘Política Nacional de Atenção Básica’ conceives comprehensive care as a set of actions for individual and collective
health, which are to affect the health situation, people’s autonomy and the social factors that determine and condition
collective health. The ‘Estrategia de Salud de la Familia’ (ESF), with its multi-profession teams, territorial basis and social
participation emphasis, is the main PHC delivery model (7).
Chile (2005, 2013) The ‘Modelo de Atención Integral de Salud, Familiar y Comunitaria’ emphasizes the equitable distribution of health care
resources so as to deliver essential health care in keeping with the Alma-Ata recommendations, with a bio-
psycho-social, user-centred approach. Features include integrated care, continuity, intersectoral cooperation, promotion and
Source: Adapted from Giovanella (25). The complete information sources by country (documents and interviews) are available in the case study reports (5–16).
maintain cooperation agreements with Cuba to address the under- (Venezuela) to 3000 (Brazil) and 5000 (Chile). Community health
supply of doctors for PHC. situation diagnosis and family records are not always in system-
One of the main problems in retaining doctors in public PHC atic use, although they are recommended as instruments for iden-
services lies in labour regulations. Employment relations and remu- tifying socio-economic and health conditions to guide health team
neration arrangements in PHC vary across all the countries. There responses in the community.
is a tendency towards more flexible and less stable labour relations, Integration of PHC with other health care providers, such as
including temporary, fixed-term contracts with fewer civil servants those involved in secondary/specialist care, is a concern of policy
in indefinite-term, budgeted positions. Instability of labour contracts makers; in addition, in all the countries, primary-level services are
and lower salaries in the public sector hinder adhesion and prevent increasingly defined as the system gateway or the first-contact ser-
the formation of bonds among the health team, families and com- vice, and the PHC team is considered the gatekeeper for access
munity. Chile is the only country with a civil service career in PHC. to specialized care. Nonetheless, officials recognize difficulties in
In most of the countries, PHC services are territorialized, with accessing specialized care, and they also realize that specialized and
user population allocation and health teams responsible for a spe- emergency services are still often used for non-severe cases. Because
cific, geographically defined target population (Table 2). The num- of short public supply, waiting times for specialized services are long,
ber of general population assigned per team varies from 1250 but are almost never monitored or made public.
264 Family Practice, 2016, Vol. 33, No. 3
Table 2. Organization of primary health care service provision in South American countries
Countries Composition of basic PHC teams at health centres PHC services territorialized: Number of general population
(‘Centros de Salud’) catchment area and population assigned per team
assignment
Argentina Medical doctors, nurse, nursing auxiliaries, midwives, Yes, uneven by state 3200–4000
dentists, paid CHWs
Bolivia Medical doctor, dentist, nursing auxiliary/technician, Yes, but allocation is developing 1000–20 000
volunteer CHWs
Brazil Family health team: medical doctor, nurse, 1–2 nursing Yes, population allocated per team 3000–4500 per family health team
auxiliaries/technicians, 5 or 6 paid CHWs in the Family Health Strategy
Oral health teams: dentist, oral health auxiliary and/or
technician
Chile Medical doctor, nurse, midwife, social assistant and Yes, population allocated per team; Up to 5000 per multidisciplinary
administrative assistant enrolment is on user initiative team
Source: Adapted from Giovanella (25). The complete information sources by country (documents and interviews) are available in the case study reports (5–16).
Intersectoral collaboration to address social determinants and collection, sanitation and access to clean water. In most countries,
promote health is another core component of comprehensive PHC. the initiatives are sparse.
All countries’ PHC policies specify health promotion, conceived as In terms of outputs and outcomes, the effect on population
action on social determinants and/or lifestyle changes, to be a key health of the various PHC systems is difficult to assess because of
component (Table 1). Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and the variety of starting points and the myriad of confounding fac-
Peru provide for nationwide intersectoral bodies. Bolivia, Brazil and tors, such as economic and social determinants of health. This is a
Uruguay have national programmes, while Guyana, Paraguay and limitation of this qualitative research that should be resolved with a
Venezuela have regional or local indicatives. At the territory level, quantitative study. All countries show improvements in the mortal-
in all countries, PHC teams take initiative to coordinate local inter- ity rate of infants and children under five, which could be related to
sectoral actions, with strong variations between countries (Table 3). the poverty reduction since 2000 in the region (19). Nonetheless, in
Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela are conspicuous for strongly inter- a 2000–12 comparison, countries with renewed models of PHC that
sectoral approaches to deploying public policy on the ‘living well’ focus on comprehensive, family and community care, such as Brazil,
paradigm. These involve integrated sets of social development poli- Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru, seem to have better gains (Table 4). Chile
cies in which different sectors converge. Several actions have been and Uruguay have the best results in both years.
undertaken with potential positive impacts on the social determi-
nants of health.
With the exception of Suriname and Argentina, in all South
Discussion and conclusions
American countries, social participation in health is formally institu- Today PHC is being revitalized in a diversity of processes that are
tionalized through national and local health councils (Table 3). The underway in SA involving new models of family, community and
community action of PHC teams is generally intended to mobilize intercultural care. New policies and renewed models of PHC are
social participation for specific actions and empower the population being implemented in seven countries (Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador,
to pressure governments to ensure public policies such as garbage Paraguay, Peru and Venezuela) that include a common mention of
Mapping primary health care renewal 265
Table 3. Intersectoral cooperation and social participation in primary health care in South American countries
Argentina Intersectoral initiatives occur on the National Social Policy Coordination Informal arrangements: local councils; in the territory,
Council, the Inter-Ministry Mental Health Program and the Community they coordinate with community organizations, social
Health Facilitator Training Program. In the municipalities, these converge in clubs and non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
the Community Integration Centres, involving actions by the Ministries of
Health, Social Development, Labour and Planning and the Social Cabinet.
Locally, the PHC teams pursue intersectoral actions through the ‘Abordaje
Territorial’ and ‘Cuidarse en Salud’ programs.
Bolivia The main intersectoral policy is the Zero Malnutrition Multi-Sector Program Formal arrangements: committees and councils at the
(involving 11 ministries, state and municipal governments and NGOs). At the national, state, municipal and local levels
local level, primary health teams relate with other sectors for specific activi-
ties in education, urban cleansing and so on.
Brazil One of the main intersectoral social development policies is the ‘Programa Formal arrangements: Health Councils at the national,
Source: Adapted from Giovanella (25). The complete information sources by country (documents and interviews) are available in the case study reports (5–16).
266 Family Practice, 2016, Vol. 33, No. 3
Table 4. Outcomes on population health of the primary health care systems in South American countries
Country Infant mortality rate Mortality rate under Maternal mortality % of children under % of births attended by
(per 1000 births) 5 years (per 1000 ratio (per 100 000 births) 1 year of age trained personnel
births) immunized against measles
Year 2012 Year 2000 Year 2012 Year 2000 Year 2012 Year 2000 Year 2012 Year 2000 Year 2012 Year 2000
comprehensive care, family focus and community focus with social Implementation of a comprehensive PHC approach encounters
participation. Implementation is gradual, however, and many of the the same obstacles as efforts to build universal health systems in SA
policies have not yet fully achieved their expected results, as found (24,25). It is conditioned and influenced by the prevailing modal-
in some prior studies (20–23). ity of social protection in health. In countries where coverage is
Tensions that remain as conceptions of PHC differ among and segmented into private or public insurance, with service packages
within the countries, and the focus of implementation varies from differentiated by users’ ability to pay, the PHC approach comprises
selective, focalized packages through emphasis on primary-level care packages centred on first-level individual care, with no territorial or
integrated into the care network, to experiences of strong commu- collective dimensions. In cases of subsidized insurance focalized on
nity action, intercultural approaches and impact on social inequali- low-income populations (or mothers and children or older adults),
ties, with PHC integrated into a social development policy (as in the the PHC focus is selective and based on a minimum service package.
‘living well’ paradigm). This approach could be termed neo-selective PHC.
Emerging empirical categories analysis show that the pro- In countries seeking to build universal public health systems to
cess of PHC implementation can be seen to involve common ele- meet individual and collective needs regardless of ability to pay, PHC
ments relating to the existing modality of health systems and the being implemented is closer to the comprehensive approach proposed
related segmentation of coverage. Prevailing assurance framework at Alma-Ata. There, PHC is a strategy for coordinating health care by
rules stipulate separation and specialization of stewardship, fund- ordering a comprehensive service network with social participation
ing, insurance and service provision functions, and the inclusion and intersectoral action to address social determinants and promote
of multiple public and private agents. The public subcomponent health, inseparably from national economic and social development.
of such systems on which PHC depends is generally designed to The multilateral agencies’ PHC renewal proposals advocate PHC
protect the population with no means of payment and the lower- as a strategy for reorienting health systems. However, this process is
income working population. Although insurance fund adminis- conditioned by health system funding and organizational arrange-
tration models differ from country to country, the administrator ments. The segmentation of coverage and funding and the fragmen-
institutions are responsible for risk management, financial resource tation of care, which have worsened over recent decades, hinder
management, user access and service provision procurement. These the implementation of comprehensive PHC, even in the context of
characteristics of the health systems mean that, although national comprehensive care policy proposals. There is a need for the two
governments respond formally for the approach to PHC design and main existing models to be studied comparatively to evaluate their
implementation (which are based on renewed PHC), the power of impacts on health outcomes and on equity in health.
the public or private institutions responsible for insurance funds is
decisive when it comes to defining PHC approach, funding organi-
zation and operating mode.
Declaration
In this manner, two trends can be seen in how PHC models are Funding: South American Institute of Government in Health (ISAGS).
organized. One is associated with segmented health systems charac- Resolution 06/2012 of the Health Council of UNASUR
terized by individual risk-focused insurance, a market orientation Ethical approval: followed the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki
and adhered to the Belmont Report principles, and obtained informed consent
and separation into individual benefit packages and collective inter-
from participants.
ventions, involving different sets of teams, one for individual care
Conflict of interest: none.
and another for collective and community actions. The other model
is associated with health systems where the public sector and territo-
rialized state planning predominate, and where individual care and References
collective and community interventions are coordinated under the 1. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Salud en las Américas. Panorama
responsibility of the same health team. regional y perfiles de país. Washington, DC: OPS, 2012.
Mapping primary health care renewal 267
2. Rovere M. Atención Primaria de la Salud en Debate. Saúde Debate 2012; 14. Goede H. Mapping and Analysis of Primary Health Care Models in South
36: 327–42. American Countries. Mapping of PHC in Suriname. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil:
3. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health sys- ISAGS, 2014. www.isags-unasur.org/uploads/biblioteca/7/bb[192]ling[3]
tems and health. Milbank Q 2005; 83: 457–502. anx[564].pdf (accessed on 17 May 2015).
4. Macinko J, Starfield B, Erinosho T. The impact of primary healthcare on 15. Ríos G. Mapeo y análisis de los modelos de Atención Primaria de Salud
population health in low- and middle-income countries. J Ambul Care en los países de América del Sur. Mapeo de la APS en Uruguay. Rio de
Manage 2009; 32: 150–71. Janeiro, Brazil: ISAGS/UNASUR, 2014. www.isags-unasur.org/uploads/
5. Ríos G. Mapeo y análisis de los modelos de Atención Primaria de Salud biblioteca/7/bb[185]ling[2]anx[559].pdf (accessed on 17 May 2015).
en los países de América del Sur. Mapeo de la APS en Argentina. Rio de 16. Tejerina Silva H. Mapeo y análisis de los modelos de Atención Primaria
Janeiro, Brazil: ISAGS/UNASUR, 2014. www.isags-unasur.org/uploads/ de Salud en los países de América del Sur. Mapeo de la APS en Venezuela.
biblioteca/7/bb[167]ling[2]anx[548].pdf (accessed on 17 May 2015). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ISAGS, 2014. www.isags-unasur.org/uploads/bibli-
6. Tejerina Silva H. Mapeo y análisis de los modelos de Atención Primaria de oteca/7/bb[178]ling[2]anx[561].pdf (accessed on 17 May 2015).
Salud en los países de América del Sur. Mapeo de la APS en Bolivia. Rio de 17. Amezcua M, Gálvez A. Los modos de análisis en investigación cualitativa
Janeiro, Brazil: ISAGS, 2014. www.isags-unasur.org/uploads/biblioteca/7/ en salud: perspectiva crítica y reflexiones en voz alta. Rev Esp Salud Pub-
bb[159]ling[2]anx[520].pdf (accessed on 17 May 2015). lica 2002; 76: 423–36.