Project:

Job No. For Macro:

Location Starting Row No.

Structure Ending Row No.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Measured Design Design
S.No. BH Structure Location EGL, m Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Level,
Depth, m Depth, m m
1 FBB-9 FB-601 MO Area 3.5 0.4 0.0 3.5
2 FBB-16 Covered Survey Yard MO Area 4.6 0.7 0.0 4.6
3 FBB-17
WED Complex - Heavy, Non-AC and AC storeMO Area 3.4 0.7 0.0 3.4
4 FBB-18
WED Complex - Heavy, Non-AC and AC storeMO Area 3.4 0.6 0.0 3.4
5 FBB-19
WED Complex - Heavy, Non-AC and AC storeMO Area 3.2 1.8 0.0 3.2
6 FBB-20
WED Complex - Heavy, Non-AC and AC storeMO Area 3.3 2.7 0.0 3.3
7 FBB-23
WED Complex - Heavy, Non-AC and AC storeMO Area 3.4 1.4 0.0 3.4
8 FBB-37
Naval Met & COMCEN Office Building Fok Building 4.3 1.5 0.0 4.3
9 FBB-38
Naval Met & COMCEN Office Building Fok Building 4.2 1.5 0.0 4.2
10 FBB-60 Diving Tank (2000l capacity) Work Harbour 4.4 5.1 0.0 4.4
11 FBB-61 NAU Office Work Harbour 4.2 4.9 0.0 4.2
12 0.0
13 0.0
14 FBB-65 WTF Workshops/stores Work Harbour 3.5 3.7 0.0 3.5
15 0.0
16 0.0
17 0.0
18 0.0
19 0.0
20 0.0
21 0.0
22 DY-1
Multilevel Car Parking at Northern Entrance
Reclaimed Area 4.7 3.0 0.0 4.7
23 DY-2
Multilevel Car Parking at Northern Entrance
Reclaimed Area 4.7 3.7 0.0 4.7
24 DY-3 Reclaimed Area Reclaimed Area 4.7 3.5 0.0 4.7
25 DY-6 Degutted item's store Reclaimed Area 4.6 3.8 0.0 4.6
26 DY-12 Central Store Reclaimed Area 4.6 3.5 0.0 4.6
For Macro:

13

33

9 10 11 12 13

Surcharge load Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment Job Number Sheet No. WS Name

0 #REF! 0 1 FBB-9
0 #REF! 0 2 FBB-16
0 #REF! 0 3 FBB-17
0 #REF! 0 4 FBB-18
0 #REF! 0 5 FBB-19
0 #REF! 0 6 FBB-20
0 #REF! 0 7 FBB-23
0 #REF! 0 8 FBB-37
0 #REF! 0 9 FBB-38
0 #REF! 0 10 FBB-60
0 #REF! 0 11 FBB-61
0 #REF! 0 12
0 #REF! 0 13
0 #REF! 0 14 FBB-65
0 #REF! 0 15
0 #REF! 0 16
0 #REF! 0 17
0 #REF! 0 18
0 #REF! 0 19
0 #REF! 0 20
0 #REF! 0 21
0 #REF! 0 22 DY-1
0 #REF! 0 23 DY-2
0 #REF! 0 24 DY-3
0 #REF! 0 25 DY-6
#REF! 0 26 DY-12
 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-9
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.5
Actual GW Depth (m): 0.4 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Design GW Level (m): 3.5 2.0 2.0
Facility Name FB-601
Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: IV
Existing Ground Level 3.5
Earthquake Magnitude: 6.7 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.24
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 3.0 1.75 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 3.0 8.0 1.90 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 8.0 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05

N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)

Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5

Factor
(T/m3)

length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
0.5 1.5 1.3 1.75 2.19 0.96 1.35
2.0 1.5 2.8 1.75 4.81 2.11 2.51
3.5 1.5 4.3 1.90 7.55 3.38 3.77
5.0 1.5 5.8 1.90 10.40 4.76 5.15
6.5 1.5 7.3 1.90 13.25 6.14 6.53
8.0 1.5 8.8
9.5
 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-9
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.5
Actual GW Depth (m): 0.4 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Design GW Level (m): 3.5 2.0 2.0
Facility Name FB-601
Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: IV
Existing Ground Level 3.5
Earthquake Magnitude: 6.7 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.24
Surcharge Load (T/m ) 2
0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 3.0 1.75 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 3.0 8.0 1.90 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 8.0 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05

N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)

Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential
 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-9
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.5
Actual GW Depth (m): 0.4 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m
D E P T H, m
Design GW Level (m): 3.5 2.0 2.0
Facility Name FB-601
Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 3.5
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 2.0 1.70 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 3.0 4.5 1.75 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 4.5 5.0 1.80 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 5.0 6.0 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SM 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.70 0.43 0.18 0.43 3 29 1.70 0.75 1.1 4.64 1.15 11 0.12 1.00 0.25 2.211 0.28 1.12
2 SM 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.70 2.13 0.90 1.29 3 29 1.70 0.75 1.1 4.64 1.15 11 0.12 0.99 0.24 2.211 0.28 1.13
3 CL 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.70 4.68 1.98 2.37 4 51 1.70 0.75 1.1 5.00 1.20 14 NL 0.98 0.24 2.211 NL NL
4 CL 3.5 5 51

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-16
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.6
Actual GW Depth (m): 0.7 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Covered Design GW Level (m): 4.6 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Survey Yard Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.6
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 3.5 1.80 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 3.5 12.5 1.85 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 12.5 15.5 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 15.5 18.5 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 CL 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.80 0.45 0.20 0.45 12 51 1.70 0.75 1.2 5.00 1.20 35 NL 1.00 0.23 2.211 NL NL
2 CL 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.80 2.25 1.02 2.25 12 51 1.70 0.75 1.2 5.00 1.20 35 NL 0.99 0.23 2.211 NL NL
3 CI 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.80 4.95 2.25 2.94 16 51 1.70 0.75 1.2 5.00 1.20 45 NL 0.98 0.22 2.211 NL NL
4 SP 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.85 7.69 3.52 4.20 16 3 1.54 0.85 1.2 0.00 1.00 35 NL 0.97 0.22 2.211 NL NL
5 SP 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.85 10.46 4.82 5.51 14 3 1.35 0.85 1.2 0.00 1.00 26 0.32 0.96 0.22 2.211 0.72 3.32
6 SP 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.85 13.24 6.13 6.81 15 3 1.21 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 28 0.39 0.94 0.21 2.211 0.86 4.03
7 Gravel 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.85 16.01 7.43 8.12 17 12 1.11 0.95 1.2 1.55 1.03 32 NL 0.93 0.21 2.211 NL NL
8 Gravel 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.85 18.79 8.73 9.42 15 12 1.03 1.00 1.2 1.55 1.03 28 0.36 0.90 0.20 2.211 0.81 4.00
9 Gravel 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.85 21.56 10.04 10.72 14 12 0.97 1.00 1.2 1.55 1.03 25 0.28 0.86 0.19 2.211 0.63 3.26
10 SC 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.90 24.38 11.38 12.06 13 51 0.91 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 28 NL 0.82 0.18 2.211 NL NL
11 CL 14.0 15 51

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-17
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.4
Actual GW Depth (m): 0.7 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
WED Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Complex - Design GW Level (m): 3.4 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Heavy, Non-
AC and AC Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
store Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 3.4
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 3.5 1.70 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 3.5 8.0 1.80 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 8.0 14.0 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 14.0 17.0 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SM 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.70 0.43 0.18 0.43 4 12 1.70 0.75 1.1 1.59 1.03 10 0.11 1.00 0.25 2.211 0.24 0.98
2 SM 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.70 2.13 0.90 2.13 4 12 1.70 0.75 1.1 1.59 1.03 10 0.11 0.99 0.24 2.211 0.24 0.99
3 SC 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.70 4.68 1.98 2.66 3 32 1.70 0.75 1.1 4.83 1.17 12 0.13 0.98 0.24 2.211 0.28 1.17
4 CH 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.80 7.30 3.13 3.82 8 51 1.62 0.85 1.1 5.00 1.20 25 NL 0.97 0.23 2.211 NL NL
5 SC 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.80 10.00 4.36 5.05 13 32 1.41 0.85 1.2 4.83 1.17 35 NL 0.96 0.23 2.211 NL NL
6 CI 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.80 12.70 5.59 6.27 16 51 1.26 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 43 NL 0.94 0.22 2.211 NL NL
7 SC 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.90 15.48 6.89 7.58 7 34 1.15 0.95 1.1 4.93 1.19 19 0.20 0.93 0.22 2.211 0.44 2.02
8 SC 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.90 18.33 8.27 8.96 18 34 1.06 1.00 1.2 4.93 1.19 42 NL 0.90 0.21 2.211 NL NL
9 SC 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.90 21.18 9.65 10.33 36 51 0.98 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 75 NL 0.86 0.20 2.211 NL NL
10 SC 12.5 40 51

Conclusion: Liquefaction susceptibility between 0 and 2 m depths

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-18
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.4
Actual GW Depth (m): 0.6 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
WED Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Complex - Design GW Level (m): 3.4 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Heavy, Non-
AC and AC Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
store Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 3.4
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 5.0 1.70 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 5.0 8.0 1.80 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 8.0 12.0 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 12.0 13.0 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SM 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.70 0.43 0.18 0.43 4 12 1.70 0.75 1.1 1.59 1.03 10 0.11 1.00 0.25 2.211 0.24 0.98
2 SM 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.70 2.13 0.90 2.13 4 12 1.70 0.75 1.1 1.59 1.03 10 0.11 0.99 0.24 2.211 0.24 0.99
3 CL 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.70 4.68 1.98 2.57 6 51 1.70 0.75 1.1 5.00 1.20 19 NL 0.98 0.24 2.211 NL NL
4 CL 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.70 7.23 3.06 3.64 10 51 1.66 0.85 1.2 5.00 1.20 33 NL 0.97 0.24 2.211 NL NL
5 SM 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.80 9.85 4.21 4.80 32 27 1.44 0.85 1.2 4.48 1.13 78 NL 0.96 0.23 2.211 NL NL
6 SC 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.80 12.55 5.44 6.03 42 51 1.29 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 107 NL 0.94 0.23 2.211 NL NL
7 Gravel 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.90 15.33 6.74 7.33 14 27 1.17 0.95 1.2 4.48 1.13 33 NL 0.93 0.22 2.211 NL NL
8 SC 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.90 18.18 8.12 8.71 18 51 1.07 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 43 NL 0.90 0.21 2.211 NL NL
9 SC 11.0 36 51

Conclusion: Liquefaction susceptibility between 0 and 2 m depths

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-19
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.2
Actual GW Depth (m): 1.8 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
WED Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Complex - Design GW Level (m): 3.2 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Heavy, Non-
AC and AC Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
store Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 3.2
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 3.5 1.70 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 3.5 8.0 1.75 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 8.0 14.0 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 14.0 15.0 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SM 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.70 0.43 0.18 0.43 6 25 1.70 0.75 1.1 4.29 1.12 17 0.18 1.00 0.25 2.211 0.40 1.65
2 SM 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.70 2.13 0.90 2.13 6 25 1.70 0.75 1.1 4.29 1.12 17 0.18 0.99 0.24 2.211 0.40 1.66
3 SM 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.70 4.68 1.98 3.74 5 25 1.63 0.75 1.1 4.29 1.12 15 0.16 0.98 0.24 2.211 0.35 1.44
4 CL 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.75 7.26 3.09 4.86 6 51 1.43 0.85 1.1 5.00 1.20 18 NL 0.97 0.24 2.211 NL NL
5 CL 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.75 9.89 4.25 6.01 7 51 1.29 0.85 1.1 5.00 1.20 19 NL 0.96 0.23 2.211 NL NL
6 CL 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.75 12.51 5.40 7.17 11 51 1.18 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 29 NL 0.94 0.23 2.211 NL NL
7 CL 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.90 15.25 6.67 8.43 17 51 1.09 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 40 NL 0.93 0.22 2.211 NL NL
8 CL 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.90 18.10 8.04 9.81 21 51 1.01 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 47 NL 0.90 0.21 2.211 NL NL
9 CI 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.90 20.95 9.42 11.19 16 51 0.95 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 35 NL 0.86 0.20 2.211 NL NL
10 CI 12.5 24 51

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-20
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.3
Actual GW Depth (m): 2.7 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
WED Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Complex - Design GW Level (m): 3.3 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Heavy, Non-
AC and AC Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
store Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 3.3
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 3.0 1.70 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 3.0 5.0 1.75 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 5.0 10.5 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 10.5 11.5 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 CL 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.70 0.43 0.18 0.43 7 51 1.70 0.75 1.1 5.00 1.20 21 NL 1.00 0.25 2.211 NL NL
2 CL 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.70 2.13 0.90 2.13 7 51 1.70 0.75 1.1 5.00 1.20 21 NL 0.99 0.24 2.211 NL NL
3 SM 2.0 1.0 2.5 1.70 4.25 1.80 4.25 9 37 1.53 0.75 1.1 5.00 1.20 24 0.27 0.98 0.24 2.211 0.60 2.47
4 CI 3.0 2.0 4.0 1.75 6.85 2.93 5.57 11 85 1.34 0.85 1.2 5.00 1.20 30 NL 0.97 0.24 2.211 NL NL
5 CI 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.90 10.03 4.38 7.03 19 85 1.19 0.85 1.2 5.00 1.20 43 NL 0.96 0.23 2.211 NL NL
6 CI 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.90 12.88 5.76 8.41 28 85 1.09 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 62 NL 0.94 0.22 2.211 NL NL
7 CI 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.90 15.73 7.14 9.79 31 85 1.01 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 64 NL 0.93 0.21 2.211 NL NL
8 CI 9.5 1.0 10.0 1.90 18.10 8.29 10.94 29 85 0.96 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 60 NL 0.91 0.21 2.211 NL NL
10.5

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-23
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.4
Actual GW Depth (m): 1.4 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location MO Area 0.0 0.0
WED Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Complex - Design GW Level (m): 3.4 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Heavy, Non-
AC and AC Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
store Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 3.4
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 3.5 1.70 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 3.5 9.5 1.80 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 9.5 14.5 1.85 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 14.5 17.5 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 Gravel 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.70 0.43 0.18 0.43 6 4 1.70 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 12 0.13 1.00 0.25 2.211 0.28 1.15
2 Gravel 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.70 2.13 0.90 2.13 6 4 1.70 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 12 0.13 0.99 0.24 2.211 0.28 1.15
3 SC 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.70 4.68 1.98 3.35 6 50 1.70 0.75 1.1 5.00 1.20 19 0.20 0.98 0.24 2.211 0.45 1.85
4 SC 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.80 7.30 3.13 4.50 15 50 1.49 0.85 1.2 5.00 1.20 43 NL 0.97 0.23 2.211 NL NL
5 SC 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.80 10.00 4.36 5.73 28 50 1.32 0.85 1.2 5.00 1.20 67 NL 0.96 0.23 2.211 NL NL
6 SC 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.80 12.70 5.59 6.96 34 50 1.20 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 82 NL 0.94 0.22 2.211 NL NL
7 SC 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.80 15.40 6.82 8.19 18 50 1.11 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 42 NL 0.93 0.22 2.211 NL NL
8 CH 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.85 18.14 8.08 9.46 22 51 1.03 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 50 NL 0.90 0.21 2.211 NL NL
9 CH 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.85 20.91 9.39 10.76 32 51 0.96 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 66 NL 0.86 0.20 2.211 NL NL
10 CH 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.85 23.69 10.69 12.06 38 51 0.91 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 73 NL 0.82 0.19 2.211 NL NL
11 SC 14.0 0.5 14.3 1.85 25.54 11.56 12.93 42 20 0.88 1.00 1.2 3.61 1.08 69 NL 0.79 0.18 2.211 NL NL
14.5

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-37
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.3
Actual GW Depth (m): 1.5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Fok
Location Building 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Naval Met &
COMCEN Design GW Level (m): 4.3 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Office Design Earthquake
Building 4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.3
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 1.5 1.75 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 1.5 8.0 1.80 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 8.0 20.0 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 20.0 21.0 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 Gravel 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.75 0.44 0.19 0.44 7 4 1.70 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 13 0.15 1.00 0.24 2.211 0.32 1.36
2 CL 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.75 2.19 0.96 2.19 7 51 1.70 0.75 1.1 5.00 1.20 21 NL 0.99 0.23 2.211 NL NL
3 SM 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.80 4.85 2.15 3.62 25 13 1.66 0.75 1.2 1.89 1.04 55 NL 0.98 0.23 2.211 NL NL
4 SM 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.80 7.55 3.38 4.85 16 13 1.44 0.85 1.2 1.89 1.04 35 NL 0.97 0.22 2.211 NL NL
5 SM 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.80 10.25 4.61 6.08 21 13 1.28 0.85 1.2 1.89 1.04 41 NL 0.96 0.22 2.211 NL NL
6 SM 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.80 12.95 5.84 7.31 22 13 1.17 0.95 1.2 1.89 1.04 44 NL 0.94 0.22 2.211 NL NL
7 CH 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.90 15.73 7.14 8.61 17 51 1.08 0.95 1.2 5.00 1.20 39 NL 0.93 0.21 2.211 NL NL
8 CH 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.90 18.58 8.52 9.99 20 51 1.00 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 45 NL 0.90 0.20 2.211 NL NL
9 SC 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.90 21.43 9.90 11.37 22 45 0.94 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 46 NL 0.86 0.19 2.211 NL NL
10 CH 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.90 24.28 11.28 12.75 30 51 0.89 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 58 NL 0.82 0.18 2.211 NL NL
11 CH 14.0 1.5 14.8 1.90 27.13 12.66 14.13 50 51 0.84 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 88 NL 0.78 0.17 2.211 NL NL
12 CH 15.5 1.5 16.3 1.90 29.98 14.03 15.51 44 51 0.80 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 75 NL 0.74 0.16 2.211 NL NL
13 SM 17.0 1.5 17.8 1.90 32.83 15.41 16.88 28 13 0.77 1.00 1.2 1.89 1.04 39 NL 0.70 0.16 2.211 NL NL
14 SM 18.5 1.5 19.3 1.90 35.68 16.79 18.26 48 13 0.74 1.00 1.2 1.89 1.04 63 NL 0.66 0.15 2.211 NL NL
20.0

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-38
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.2
Actual GW Depth (m): 1.5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Fok
Location Building 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Naval Met &
COMCEN Design GW Level (m): 4.2 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Office Design Earthquake
Building 4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.2
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 6.5 1.80 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 6.5 12.5 1.80 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 12.5 21.5 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 21.5 22.5 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 Gravel 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.80 0.45 0.20 0.45 5 4 1.70 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 10 0.11 1.00 0.23 2.211 0.24 1.07
2 SP 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.80 2.25 1.02 2.25 5 4 1.70 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 10 0.11 0.99 0.23 2.211 0.24 1.07
3 SP 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.80 4.95 2.25 3.72 12 4 1.64 0.75 1.2 0.00 1.00 24 0.28 0.98 0.22 2.211 0.62 2.76
4 SP 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.80 7.65 3.48 4.95 15 4 1.42 0.85 1.2 0.00 1.00 30 0.46 0.97 0.22 2.211 1.02 4.59
5 SP 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.80 10.35 4.71 6.18 19 4 1.27 0.85 1.2 0.00 1.00 34 NL 0.96 0.22 2.211 NL NL
6 SP-SM 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.80 13.05 5.94 7.41 17 5 1.16 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 31 NL 0.94 0.22 2.211 NL NL
7 SP-SM 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.80 15.75 7.17 8.64 19 5 1.08 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 32 NL 0.93 0.21 2.211 NL NL
8 CL 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.80 18.45 8.39 9.87 16 51 1.01 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 37 NL 0.90 0.21 2.211 NL NL
9 CL 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.80 21.15 9.62 11.09 19 51 0.95 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 41 NL 0.86 0.20 2.211 NL NL
10 CI 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.90 23.93 10.93 12.40 24 51 0.90 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 48 NL 0.82 0.19 2.211 NL NL
11 CI 14.0 1.5 14.8 1.90 26.78 12.31 13.78 26 51 0.85 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 49 NL 0.78 0.18 2.211 NL NL
12 CI 15.5 1.5 16.3 1.90 29.63 13.68 15.16 26 51 0.81 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 47 NL 0.74 0.17 2.211 NL NL
13 CH 17.0 1.5 17.8 1.90 32.48 15.06 16.53 28 51 0.78 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 48 NL 0.70 0.16 2.211 NL NL
14 CL 18.5 1.5 19.3 1.90 35.33 16.44 17.91 48 51 0.75 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 76 NL 0.66 0.15 2.211 NL NL
15 CL 20.0 1.5 20.8 1.90 38.18 17.82 19.29 56 51 0.72 1.00 0.8 5.00 1.20 58 NL 0.62 0.14 2.211 NL NL
21.5

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-60
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.4
Actual GW Depth (m): 5.1 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Work
Location Harbour 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Diving Tank Design GW Level (m): 4.4 2.0 2.0
Facility Name (2000l
capacity) Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.4
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 5.0 1.75 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 5.0 11.0 1.80 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 11.0 17.0 1.85 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 17.0 18.0 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 Gravel 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.75 0.44 0.19 0.44 10 4 1.70 0.75 1.2 0.00 1.00 21 0.23 1.00 0.24 2.211 0.51 2.14
2 SP 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.75 2.19 0.96 2.19 10 4 1.70 0.75 1.2 0.00 1.00 21 0.23 0.99 0.23 2.211 0.51 2.16
3 SP 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.75 4.81 2.11 4.81 8 2 1.44 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 13 0.14 0.98 0.23 2.211 0.31 1.35
4 SP 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.75 7.44 3.27 7.44 6 2 1.16 0.85 1.1 0.00 1.00 9 0.10 0.97 0.23 2.211 0.23 1.00
5 SP 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.80 10.10 4.46 10.10 9 2 1.00 0.85 1.1 0.00 1.00 12 0.13 0.96 0.23 2.211 0.28 1.24
6 SP 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.80 12.80 5.69 10.69 12 2 0.97 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 18 0.19 0.94 0.22 2.211 0.43 1.94
7 SP 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.80 15.50 6.92 11.92 15 2 0.92 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 22 0.24 0.93 0.22 2.211 0.52 2.39
8 SP 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.80 18.20 8.14 13.15 18 2 0.87 1.00 1.2 0.00 1.00 26 0.31 0.90 0.21 2.211 0.69 3.28
9 CI 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.85 20.94 9.41 14.41 15 51 0.83 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 30 NL 0.86 0.20 2.211 NL NL
10 CI 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.85 23.71 10.71 15.72 19 51 0.80 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 35 NL 0.82 0.19 2.211 NL NL
11 CI 14.0 1.5 14.8 1.85 26.49 12.02 17.02 23 51 0.77 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 40 NL 0.78 0.18 2.211 NL NL
12 CI 15.5 1.5 16.3 1.85 29.26 13.32 18.32 25 51 0.74 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 42 NL 0.74 0.17 2.211 NL NL
17.0

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-61
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.2
Actual GW Depth (m): 4.9 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Work
Location Harbour 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Design GW Level (m): 4.2 2.0 2.0
Facility Name NAU Office
Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.2
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 5.0 1.70 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 5.0 11.0 1.75 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 11.0 15.0 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 15.0 16.0 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SP 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.70 0.43 0.18 0.43 4 4 1.70 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 8 0.09 1.00 0.25 2.211 0.21 0.84
2 SP 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.70 2.13 0.90 2.13 4 4 1.70 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 8 0.09 0.99 0.24 2.211 0.21 0.85
3 SP 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.70 4.68 1.98 4.68 8 4 1.46 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 13 0.14 0.98 0.24 2.211 0.32 1.31
4 SP 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.70 7.23 3.06 7.23 7 4 1.18 0.85 1.1 0.00 1.00 11 0.12 0.97 0.24 2.211 0.26 1.10
5 SP 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.75 9.81 4.17 8.98 10 4 1.06 0.85 1.2 0.00 1.00 15 0.16 0.96 0.23 2.211 0.35 1.49
6 SP 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.75 12.44 5.33 10.13 12 4 0.99 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 19 0.20 0.94 0.23 2.211 0.44 1.92
7 SP-SM 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.75 15.06 6.48 11.29 17 5 0.94 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 25 0.29 0.93 0.23 2.211 0.65 2.87
8 SP-SM 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.75 17.69 7.63 12.44 21 5 0.90 1.00 1.2 0.00 1.00 31 NL 0.90 0.22 2.211 NL NL
9 CH 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.90 20.43 8.90 13.71 20 81 0.85 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 39 NL 0.86 0.21 2.211 NL NL
10 CH 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.90 23.28 10.28 15.08 28 81 0.81 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 50 NL 0.82 0.19 2.211 NL NL
11 CH 14.0 1.0 14.5 1.90 25.65 11.43 16.23 32 81 0.78 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 55 NL 0.79 0.18 2.211 NL NL
15.0

Conclusion: Liquefaction susceptibility between 0 and 1.5 m depths

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. FBB-65
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.5
Actual GW Depth (m): 3.7 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Work
Location Harbour 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
WTF Design GW Level (m): 3.5 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Workshops/
stores Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 3.5
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 6.5 1.70 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 6.5 11.0 1.85 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 11.0 15.5 1.90 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 15.5 16.5 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 Gravel 0.0 3.5 1.8 1.70 2.98 1.26 2.98 3 3 1.70 0.75 1.1 0.00 1.00 6 0.08 0.99 0.24 2.211 0.17 0.71
2 SP 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.70 7.23 3.06 7.23 3 3 1.18 0.85 1.1 0.00 1.00 5 0.07 0.97 0.24 2.211 0.15 0.64
3 SP 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.70 9.78 4.13 7.76 4 3 1.13 0.85 1.1 0.00 1.00 6 0.08 0.96 0.24 2.211 0.17 0.74
4 SP 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.85 12.44 5.33 8.95 11 3 1.06 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 18 0.19 0.94 0.23 2.211 0.43 1.87
5 SP 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.85 15.21 6.63 10.26 14 3 0.99 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 22 0.24 0.93 0.22 2.211 0.52 2.35
6 SP 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.85 17.99 7.93 11.56 20 3 0.93 1.00 1.2 0.00 1.00 31 NL 0.90 0.21 2.211 NL NL
7 CH 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.90 20.80 9.27 12.90 23 83 0.88 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 45 NL 0.86 0.20 2.211 NL NL
8 CH 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.90 23.65 10.65 14.28 27 83 0.84 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 50 NL 0.82 0.19 2.211 NL NL
9 CH 14.0 1.5 14.8 1.90 26.50 12.03 15.66 32 83 0.80 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 56 NL 0.78 0.18 2.211 NL NL
15.5

Conclusion: Liquefaction susceptibility between 0 and 6 m depths

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. DY-1
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.7
Actual GW Depth (m): 3.0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Reclaimed
Location Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Multilevel
Car Parking Design GW Level (m): 4.7 2.0 2.0
Facility Name at Northern Design Earthquake
Entrance 4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.7
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 2.0 1.80 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 2.0 11.0 1.90 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 11.0 12.0 2.00 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 12.0 15.0 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SM 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.80 0.45 0.20 0.45 10 21 1.70 0.75 1.2 3.78 1.09 27 0.33 1.00 0.23 2.211 0.73 3.18
2 SM 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.80 2.25 1.02 2.25 10 21 1.70 0.75 1.2 3.78 1.09 27 0.33 0.99 0.23 2.211 0.73 3.20
3 SM 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.90 5.03 2.33 5.03 33 21 1.41 0.75 1.2 3.78 1.09 66 NL 0.98 0.22 2.211 NL NL
4 SM 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.90 7.88 3.71 6.65 36 21 1.23 0.85 1.2 3.78 1.09 71 NL 0.97 0.21 2.211 NL NL
5 SM 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.90 10.73 5.08 8.03 42 21 1.12 0.85 1.2 3.78 1.09 75 NL 0.96 0.21 2.211 NL NL
6 SM 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.90 13.58 6.46 9.41 38 21 1.03 0.95 1.2 3.78 1.09 70 NL 0.94 0.21 2.211 NL NL
7 SM 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.90 16.43 7.84 10.78 58 16 0.96 0.95 1.2 2.77 1.05 95 NL 0.93 0.20 2.211 NL NL
8 SM 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.90 19.28 9.22 12.16 26 16 0.91 1.00 1.2 2.77 1.05 44 NL 0.90 0.20 2.211 NL NL
9 CI 11.0 1.0 11.5 2.00 21.70 10.42 13.36 48 51 0.87 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 87 NL 0.87 0.19 2.211 NL NL
12.0

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. DY-2
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.7
Actual GW Depth (m): 3.7 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Reclaimed
Location Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Multilevel
Car Parking Design GW Level (m): 4.7 2.0 2.0
Facility Name at Northern Design Earthquake
Entrance 4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.7
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 11.0 1.85 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 11.0 16.5 1.90 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 16.5 19.5 1.95 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 19.5 22.5 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SM 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.85 0.46 0.22 0.46 18 17 1.70 0.75 1.2 3.01 1.06 43 NL 1.00 0.22 2.211 NL NL
2 SM 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.85 2.31 1.09 2.31 18 17 1.70 0.75 1.2 3.01 1.06 43 NL 0.99 0.22 2.211 NL NL
3 SM 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.85 5.09 2.39 5.09 24 17 1.40 0.75 1.2 3.01 1.06 47 NL 0.98 0.22 2.211 NL NL
4 SM 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.85 7.86 3.69 7.86 27 17 1.13 0.85 1.2 3.01 1.06 48 NL 0.97 0.21 2.211 NL NL
5 SM 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.85 10.64 5.00 8.63 34 17 1.08 0.85 1.2 3.01 1.06 57 NL 0.96 0.21 2.211 NL NL
6 SM 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.85 13.41 6.30 9.93 24 17 1.00 0.95 1.2 3.01 1.06 43 NL 0.94 0.21 2.211 NL NL
7 SM 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.85 16.19 7.60 11.23 27 17 0.94 0.95 1.2 3.01 1.06 45 NL 0.93 0.21 2.211 NL NL
8 SM 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.85 18.96 8.91 12.54 30 17 0.89 1.00 1.2 3.01 1.06 50 NL 0.90 0.20 2.211 NL NL
9 SM 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.90 21.78 10.25 13.88 36 17 0.85 1.00 1.2 3.01 1.06 56 NL 0.86 0.19 2.211 NL NL
10 SC 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.90 24.63 11.63 15.26 26 43 0.81 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 47 NL 0.82 0.18 2.211 NL NL
11 SC 14.0 1.5 14.8 1.90 27.48 13.01 16.63 30 43 0.78 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 51 NL 0.78 0.17 2.211 NL NL
12 SC 15.5 1.5 16.3 1.90 30.33 14.38 18.01 37 43 0.75 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 60 NL 0.74 0.16 2.211 NL NL
13 MH 17.0 1.5 17.8 1.95 33.21 15.80 19.43 40 51 0.72 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 62 NL 0.70 0.15 2.211 NL NL
14 MH 18.5 1.0 19.0 1.95 35.65 17.01 20.64 47 51 0.70 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 70 NL 0.67 0.15 2.211 NL NL
19.5

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. DY-3
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.7
Actual GW Depth (m): 3.5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Reclaimed
Location Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Reclaimed Design GW Level (m): 4.7 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Area Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.7
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 6.0 1.80 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 6.0 12.5 1.85 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 12.5 20.5 1.95 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 20.5 21.5 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SP 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.80 0.45 0.20 0.45 14 4 1.70 0.75 1.2 0.00 1.00 29 0.43 1.00 0.23 2.211 0.96 4.19
2 SP 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.80 2.25 1.02 2.25 14 4 1.70 0.75 1.2 0.00 1.00 29 0.43 0.99 0.23 2.211 0.96 4.22
3 SP 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.80 4.95 2.25 4.95 18 4 1.42 0.75 1.2 0.00 1.00 32 NL 0.98 0.22 2.211 NL NL
4 SP 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.80 7.65 3.48 6.91 24 4 1.20 0.85 1.2 0.00 1.00 40 NL 0.97 0.22 2.211 NL NL
5 SP 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.80 10.35 4.71 8.14 22 4 1.11 0.85 1.2 0.00 1.00 34 NL 0.96 0.22 2.211 NL NL
6 SP 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.85 13.09 5.98 9.41 30 4 1.03 0.95 1.2 0.00 1.00 48 NL 0.94 0.22 2.211 NL NL
7 SP-SM 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.85 15.86 7.28 10.71 34 6 0.97 0.95 1.2 0.03 1.00 52 NL 0.93 0.21 2.211 NL NL
8 SP-SM 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.85 18.64 8.58 12.02 27 6 0.91 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 41 NL 0.90 0.20 2.211 NL NL
9 SP-SM 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.85 21.41 9.89 13.32 30 6 0.87 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 43 NL 0.86 0.19 2.211 NL NL
10 CI 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.95 24.26 11.26 14.70 20 55 0.82 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 38 NL 0.82 0.18 2.211 NL NL
11 CI 14.0 1.5 14.8 1.95 27.19 12.72 16.15 23 55 0.79 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 41 NL 0.78 0.17 2.211 NL NL
12 MH 15.5 1.5 16.3 1.95 30.11 14.17 17.60 28 55 0.75 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 47 NL 0.74 0.16 2.211 NL NL
13 MH 17.0 1.5 17.8 1.95 33.04 15.62 19.06 34 55 0.72 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 54 NL 0.70 0.15 2.211 NL NL
14 MH 18.5 1.5 19.3 1.95 35.96 17.08 20.51 42 55 0.70 1.00 1.2 5.00 1.20 63 NL 0.66 0.14 2.211 NL NL
15 CL 20.0 0.5 20.3 1.95 37.91 18.05 21.48 48 55 0.68 1.00 0.8 5.00 1.20 48 NL 0.63 0.14 2.211 NL NL
20.5

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. DY-6
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.6
Actual GW Depth (m): 3.8 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Reclaimed
Location Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Degutted Design GW Level (m): 4.6 2.0 2.0
Facility Name item's store Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.6
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 10.0 1.85 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 10.0 21.0 1.90 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 21.0 24.0 2.60 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 24.0

N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)

Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SP-SM 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.85 0.46 0.22 0.46 12 7 1.70 0.75 1.2 0.12 1.01 26 0.30 1.00 0.22 2.211 0.67 3.04
2 SP-SM 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.85 2.31 1.09 2.31 12 7 1.70 0.75 1.2 0.12 1.01 26 0.30 0.99 0.22 2.211 0.67 3.06
3 SP-SM 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.85 5.09 2.39 5.09 19 7 1.40 0.75 1.2 0.12 1.01 33 NL 0.98 0.22 2.211 NL NL
4 SP-SM 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.85 7.86 3.69 7.86 22 7 1.13 0.85 1.2 0.12 1.01 35 NL 0.97 0.21 2.211 NL NL
5 SP-SM 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.85 10.64 5.00 8.72 16 7 1.07 0.85 1.2 0.12 1.01 24 0.28 0.96 0.21 2.211 0.62 2.92
6 SP-SM 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.85 13.41 6.30 10.03 19 7 1.00 0.95 1.2 0.12 1.01 30 NL 0.94 0.21 2.211 NL NL
7 SP-SM 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.85 16.19 7.60 11.33 21 7 0.94 0.95 1.2 0.12 1.01 31 NL 0.93 0.21 2.211 NL NL
8 SP-SM 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.85 18.96 8.91 12.64 25 6 0.89 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 37 NL 0.90 0.20 2.211 NL NL
9 SP-SM 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.90 21.78 10.25 13.98 28 6 0.85 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 39 NL 0.86 0.19 2.211 NL NL
10 SP-SM 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.90 24.63 11.63 15.35 32 6 0.81 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 43 NL 0.82 0.18 2.211 NL NL
11 SP-SM 14.0 1.5 14.8 1.90 27.48 13.01 16.73 35 6 0.77 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 45 NL 0.78 0.17 2.211 NL NL
12 SP-SM 15.5 1.5 16.3 1.90 30.33 14.38 18.11 38 6 0.74 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 47 NL 0.74 0.16 2.211 NL NL
13 SP-SM 17.0 1.5 17.8 1.90 33.18 15.76 19.49 41 6 0.72 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 49 NL 0.70 0.15 2.211 NL NL
14 SP-SM 18.5 1.5 19.3 1.90 36.03 17.14 20.87 40 6 0.69 1.00 1.2 0.03 1.00 46 NL 0.66 0.14 2.211 NL NL
15 SP-SM 20.0 1.0 20.5 1.90 38.40 18.29 22.02 47 6 0.67 1.00 0.8 0.03 1.00 35 NL 0.63 0.14 2.211 NL NL
21.0

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. DY-12
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 4.6
Actual GW Depth (m): 3.5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Reclaimed
Location Area 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Central Design GW Level (m): 4.6 2.0 2.0
Facility Name Store Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: III
Existing Ground Level 4.6
Earthquake Magnitude: 5.5 6.0 6.0
PGA (g): 0.16
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0 8.0 8.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0
10.0 10.0
Boring Details Bulk Density Profile
12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A
Used: trip/auto 0.0 5.0 1.80 16.0 16.0
Delta FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1.33 5.0 15.5 1.85 18.0 Fill 18.0 Area
Area
FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 15.5 21.7 1.95 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1.05 21.7 24.7 2.60
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5
(T/m3)

Factor
length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 SM 0.0 0.5 0.3 1.80 0.45 0.20 0.45 18 20 1.70 0.75 1.2 3.61 1.08 44 NL 1.00 0.23 2.211 NL NL
2 SM 0.5 1.5 1.3 1.80 2.25 1.02 2.25 18 20 1.70 0.75 1.2 3.61 1.08 44 NL 0.99 0.23 2.211 NL NL
3 SM 2.0 1.5 2.8 1.80 4.95 2.25 4.95 36 20 1.42 0.75 1.2 3.61 1.08 72 NL 0.98 0.22 2.211 NL NL
4 SM 3.5 1.5 4.3 1.80 7.65 3.48 6.91 40 20 1.20 0.85 1.2 3.61 1.08 76 NL 0.97 0.22 2.211 NL NL
5 SM 5.0 1.5 5.8 1.85 10.39 4.75 8.18 26 20 1.11 0.85 1.2 3.61 1.08 47 NL 0.96 0.22 2.211 NL NL
6 SM 6.5 1.5 7.3 1.85 13.16 6.05 9.48 34 20 1.03 0.95 1.2 3.61 1.08 63 NL 0.94 0.21 2.211 NL NL
7 SM 8.0 1.5 8.8 1.85 15.94 7.35 10.79 30 20 0.96 0.95 1.2 3.61 1.08 52 NL 0.93 0.21 2.211 NL NL
8 SM 9.5 1.5 10.3 1.85 18.71 8.66 12.09 28 20 0.91 1.00 1.2 3.61 1.08 49 NL 0.90 0.20 2.211 NL NL
9 SM 11.0 1.5 11.8 1.85 21.49 9.96 13.39 44 20 0.86 1.00 1.2 3.61 1.08 71 NL 0.86 0.19 2.211 NL NL
10 SM 12.5 1.5 13.3 1.85 24.26 11.26 14.70 44 20 0.82 1.00 1.2 3.61 1.08 68 NL 0.82 0.18 2.211 NL NL
11 SP 14.0 1.5 14.8 1.85 27.04 12.57 16.00 40 4 0.79 1.00 1.2 0.00 1.00 52 NL 0.78 0.17 2.211 NL NL
12 SC 15.5 1.5 16.3 1.95 29.89 13.95 17.38 38 32 0.76 1.00 1.2 4.83 1.17 60 NL 0.74 0.16 2.211 NL NL
13 SC 17.0 1.5 17.8 1.95 32.81 15.40 18.83 34 32 0.73 1.00 1.2 4.83 1.17 53 NL 0.70 0.16 2.211 NL NL
SC 18.5 1.5 19.3 1.95 35.74 16.85 20.29 38 32 0.70 1.00 0.8 4.83 1.17 39 NL 0.66 0.15 2.211 NL NL
20.0

Conclusion: No Liquefaction potential

 1
Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. BH2
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.4
Actual GW Depth (m): 0.7 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Design GW Level (m): 3.4
Structure 2.0 2.0
Design Earthquake
4.0 4.0
Seismic Zone: IV
Existing Ground Level 3.4
Earthquake Magnitude: 6.7 6.0
6.0
PGA (g): 0.24
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0 8.0 8.0

Boring Details 10.0 10.0

Bulk Density Profile
Standard Equipment Y 12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A 16.0 16.0
Used: trip/auto 0.0 7.0 1.80 #REF!
FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1 7.0 10.0 1.87 18.0 #REF! 18.0 #REF!
CRR FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 10.0 16.0 1.92 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1 16.0 20.0 1.95
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Layer Thickness (m)

Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5

Factor
(T/m3)

length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1 CI 0.0 7.0 3.5 1.80 6.30 2.87 6.30 15 55 1.26 1.00 1.0 0.50 1.20 23 NL 0.97 0.33 1.334 NL NL
2 CI 7.0 1.5 7.8 1.87 14.00 6.40 7.09 17 55 1.19 1.00 1.0 0.50 1.20 25 NL 0.94 0.32 1.334 NL NL
3 SM 8.5 1.5 9.3 1.87 16.81 7.73 8.42 23 20 1.09 1.00 1.0 3.61 1.08 31 NL 0.93 0.31 1.334 NL NL
4 SM 10.0 20 1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
1.00 1.0
 1
Liquefaction Susceptibility Assessment (based on SPT-N value)
Analysis in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 ANNEX F (Clause 3.12 & 6.3.5.3)
Site Levels CRR(7.5) , CSR(7.5) Computed FOS against liquefaction
Borehole No. BH2
Existing Ground Level, EGL (m): 3.4
Actual GW Depth (m): 0.7 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Location 0.0 0.0
Design GW Depth (m): 0.0

D E P T H, m

D E P T H, m
Design GW Level (m): 3.4
Structure 2.0 2.0
Design Earthquake
Seismic Zone: IV 4.0 4.0
Existing Ground Level 3.4
Earthquake Magnitude: 6.7 6.0
6.0
PGA (g): 0.24
Surcharge Load (T/m 2) 0.0
Factor of Safety (FS): 1.0 8.0 8.0

Boring Details 10.0 10.0

Bulk Density Profile
Standard Equipment Y 12.0 12.0
Sampler with liner? N Depth, m gb
14.0 14.0
Hammer Donut hammer with From To T/m3
A 16.0 16.0
Used: trip/auto 0.0 7.0 1.80 #REF!
FOS
Hammer Type Correction (C HT) : 1 7.0 10.0 1.87 18.0 #REF! 18.0 #REF!
CRR FOS
Borehole Diameter (mm): 150 10.0 16.0 1.92 20.0 20.0
Borehole Diameter Correction (C BD) : 1 16.0 20.0 1.95
N/A : Not Applicable (as in the case of unsaturated soils)
Calculations NL : Not Liquefiable, e.g. if (N1)60,cs>30, PI>15%, or Fines Content>50%
Middle of Layer, based

Middle of Layer, based

Layer Thickness (m)

Layer based on actual

against liquefaction
on design GWT (T/m2)
Pressure at Middle of

on actual GWT (T/m2)

Magnitude Scaling
Depth to Middle of

Correction for rod

Fines Content (%)

Stress Reduction
Correction Factor
Effective Stress at

Effective Stress at
Soil Description

Total Overburden
Depth to Top of

Computed FOS
Overburden
Unit weight

GWT (T/m2)

Correction
Layer (m)

Layer (m)

Factor (rd)
Sampler

(N1)60CS

CRR7.5

Factor
(T/m3)

length
Layer

CRR
CSR
CRL

CSS
Nm

CN

b
1.00 1.0