You are on page 1of 6
‘Ashland University: Dwight Schar College of Education: Office of Field Experiences & Internships Internship Supervisor/Cooperating Teacher - CPAST Observation Report Form ss Candidate Name: Marianne Ference 1p#..1396097 Date: 11/4/20 Cooperating Teacher. Eileen Meehan Supervisor. Sharon Swan Course # EDEC466 Grade/Subject: Kindergarten ‘School/District: Normandy/Bay Schools. SCALE: 3 Exceeds Expectations 2 = Meets Expectations, 1 = Emerging, 0 = Does Not Meet Expectations Reference the Pedagogy Evaluation Rubric to score this observation form. — I. Planning for Instruction and Assessment 2 _A. Focus for Learning: Standards and Objectives/Targets 28. Materials and Resources 2c. Assessment of P-12 Leaming 2. Differentiated Methods ‘Comments: vous objectives are observable and measurable, great! Marianne used visual cards, repeated the letters verbally and used sign language, as well. I. instructional Delivery 2 _E.Leaming Target and Directions 2 F. Critical Thinking 3. Checking for Understanding & Adjusting instruction through Formative Assessment |2__1, Safe and Respectful Leaming Environment |Comments: Marianne used formative assessment throughout her lesson by checking for understanding. Comments: 71 to keep more data while you ae instructing. Making notes of whether the students focused parkepating.and whether thoy aro meotng th objctves. When you say, "g00d ob", Bo sur to Follow up with ‘why it was @ good job. This will reinforce the learning. IW. Analysis of Teaching 2__M Connections to Research and Theory Comments: Professional Dispositions Evaluation 2_7. Advocacy to Meet the Needs of Leamers or for the Teaching Profession ‘Comments: Vil. Critical Thinking and Reflective Practice 2 _N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Constructive Crtcism Comments: Goals/Suggestions for future lessons: ‘COMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Keep more data during instruction. 2. Follow through with feedback to reinforce student learning. ‘Ashland University: Dwight char Cokege of Education: Offes of Field Experiences &Intomships Internship Supervisor/Cooperating Teacher ~ PAST Observation Report Form sis Candidate Name: _ I (De O77 va: _ 13/2 /ap20 Cooperating Teacher: Ej Supervisor: Ss, Course #: tly __ Grade/Subject:_ A“ ‘SchoolDistrict: SCALE: 3= Exceeds Expectations 2 = Meets Expectations, 1 = Emerging, 0= Does Not Mest Expectations Reference the Pedagogy Evaluation Rubric to score this observation form. |. Planning for Instruction and Assessment 2A. Focus for Leaming: Standards and Obiecives/Taraels 28. Materials and Resources 26. Assessment of -12 Learning 3. 0. Ditferenated Methods a ae [ign 42 Mihi? O. Lut pie Winstructional Delivery = |B Leaming Target and Directions 3 F. Catia Thinking |Z G cohecking for Understanding & Adjusting instruction through Formative Assessment |_3 Hi. Diaital Tools and Resources 2. Safe and Respectful Learning Environment sma pbb deo? thew oj thoi Foy rata Il, Assessment 3 J. Data-Guided Instruction K. Feedback to Learners L. Assessment Techniques ‘Comments: IV. Analysis of Teaching BS M. Connections to Research and Theory : comin} haps f the cosas mp|Aahad iL Professional Dispositions Evaluation V. Professional Commitment and Behaviors — & IN. Participates in Professional Development (PD) | 2 ©. Demonstrates Effective Communication with Parents or Legal Guardians | BP. Demonstrates Punctuality 3,0, Moots Deadhines and Obligations | | JR. Preparation comrtente! ewan a al dn lente ona gai. rofessional Relationships 3.8. Collaboration 21. Aévocacy 10 Meet the Needs of Learners or forthe Teaching Profession Comments: Vil Critical Thinking and Reflective Practice <3. w. Responds Postvay to Feedback and Constuctve Crim ‘Comments: "ppee® pee Pe & Toe Toh. ae orem byt RECOMMENDATIONS: ore 41 ig fn foe ey naa (Ce. SiperscecT -fl2{ 2. Ashland University: Collage of Education: Office of Feld Experiences & etemshie Internship SupervisoriCooperating T ‘Teacher ~ CPAST Observation Report Form #1 a Candidate Name: Cooperating Teacher: Course #:_Lblo Grade/Subject SCALE: 3= Excoads Expectations 2 = Meets Expectations, 1 = Emerging, 0 = Does Not Meet Expectations. Reference the Pedagogy Evaluation Rubric to score this observation form. I. Planning for Instruction and Assessment _2_A, Focus for Leaming: Standards and Objectves/Targets 2.8. Mati nd Resouces zo Assessmnt of P12 Learning “2D. Differentiated Methods Comments: Ayelet febulal plone’ 2. E. Learning Taraet and Directions 3_F. cates! Thinking G. Checking for Understanding & Adjusting instruction through Formative Assessment + H., Digital Tools and Resources |. Sate and Respectful Learning Environment | |Comments: arly tartar Ayralat nc potorae Thus S giles of fan keedow | Il. Instructional Delivery 7 7 | | ederednw | Il, Assessment ZX, Data-Guided instruction 2" ik. Feedback to Leamers 3V,.. pesassment Techni ‘ a yf the hog aletents ‘Comments: bye) AMrrd fr char Tepe OP he dat allatirn IV. Analysis of Teaching M. Connections to Research and Theory ‘Comments: goles Professional Dispositions Evaluation V. Professi | Commitment and Behaviors 2 Wi Partspates in Protessional Developmen (PD) 0. Demonstrates Effective Communication with Parents or Legal Guardians P. Demonstrates Punctualty Q. Moots Deadlines and Obligations | —— R. Preparation Comments: 4 PD) w ee the fem of Dears coro arte CT oo Hiaballtce, Me Mialipie ae S. Collaboration 1. Advocacy to Meet he Needs of Leamers or forthe Teaching Profession Vil. Critical Thinking and Reflective Practice ” ; pen 3__N. Responds Positively to Feedback and Corse Scan Comments: Massand isd Unitit,d Uhasing Leh i folewatng AHEM Goals/Suggestions for future lessons: 04/ nua haw quuchly sfruchesc D opt om /pumben 7 Nett 4 Aides wttt Mey ond msislital Upeplastiere 4 Ke RECOMMENDATIONS: 7). 9/4 ine hk Lherlen (2103/9090 pra toto Sop Caprag Tor wae LOLCEfH0 (CC: SuperssoneT ‘igang of Tesh Eaueaton carne ae (CC Teacher Eaucaton

You might also like