You are on page 1of 17

Human Resource

Management
ELEVENTH EDITION
1
GARY DESSLER

Part 4 | Compensation

Chapter
11

Establishing Strategic Pay Plans

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook


All rights reserved. The University of West Alabama
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

1. List the basic factors in determining pay rates.


2. Explain in detail how to establish pay rates.
3. Explain how to price managerial and professional jobs.
4. Discuss competency-based pay and other current
trends in compensation.

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–2
Basic Factors in Determining
Pay Rates

Employee
Compensation

Direct Financial Indirect Financial


Payments Payments

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–3
Legal Considerations in Compensation

Davis-Bacon Act (1931) Equal Pay Act (1963)

Walsh-Healey Public Employee Retirement


Contract Act (1936) Income Security Act (ERISA)

Title VII of the 1964 Employee Age Discrimination in


Civil Rights Act Compensation Employment Act

Fair Labor Standards Act Americans with


(1938) Disabilities Act

The Family and Medical The Social Security Act of


Leave Act 1935 (as amended)

Workers’ Compensation
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All
rights reserved. 11–4
Equity and Its Impact on Pay Rates

Forms of Equity

External Internal Individual Procedural


Equity Equity Equity Equity

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–5
Addressing Equity Issues

Salary Surveys

Job Analysis and


Job Evaluation
Methods to
Address Equity
Issues Performance Appraisal
and Incentive Pay

Communications, Grievance
Mechanisms, and Employees’
Participation

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–6
The Salary Survey

Step 1. The Wage Survey:


Uses for Salary Surveys

To price To market- To make


benchmark price wages decisions
jobs for jobs about benefits

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–7
Sources for Salary Surveys

Sources of Wage and


Salary Information

Employer Self-
Consulting Professional Government The
Conducted
Firms Associations Agencies Internet
Surveys

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–8
Establishing Pay Rates (cont’d)

Skills

Effort
Step 2. Job Evaluation:
Identifying
Compensable Factors
Responsibility

Working Conditions

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–9
Establishing Pay Rates (cont’d)

Methods for
Evaluating Jobs

Job Point Factor


Ranking
Classification Method Comparison

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–10
Establishing Pay Rates (cont’d)

Point Method

Step 3. Group
Similar Jobs Ranking Method
into Pay Grades

Classification Methods

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–11
Pricing Managerial and Professional Jobs

Compensating Executives
and Managers

Executive
Base Short-term Long-Term
Benefits and
Pay Incentives Incentives
Perks

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–12
Competency-Based Pay (cont’d)

Why Use Competency-


Based Pay?

Support High- Support


Support
Performance Performance
Strategic Aims
Work Systems Management

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–13
Other Compensation Trends
• Broadbanding
 Consolidating salary grades and ranges into just a
few wide levels or “bands,” each of which contains a
relatively wide range of jobs and salary levels.
 Pro and Cons
 More flexibility in assigning workers to different job grades.
 Provides support for flatter hierarchies and teams.
 Promotes skills learning and mobility.
 Lack of permanence in job responsibilities can be unsettling
to new employees.

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All


rights reserved. 11–14
KEY TERMS

employee compensation compensable factor


direct financial payments ranking method
indirect financial payments job classification (or grading) method
Davis-Bacon Act (1931) classes
Walsh-Healey Public Contract Act grades
(1936) grade definition
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act point method
Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) factor comparison method
Equal Pay Act (1963) pay grade
Employee Retirement Income wage curve
Security Act (ERISA) pay ranges
salary compression competency-based pay
salary survey competencies
benchmark job broadbanding
job evaluation
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All comparable worth
rights reserved. 11–15
Human Resource
Management
ELEVENTH EDITION
1
GARY DESSLER

Part 4 | Compensation

Appendix for
Chapter 11

Quantitative Job Evaluation Methods

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook


All rights reserved. The University of West Alabama
Quantitative Job Evaluation Methods
• Factor Comparison Job Evaluation Method
Step 1. Obtain job information
Step 2. Select key benchmark jobs
Step 3. Rank key jobs by factor
Step 4. Distribute wage rates by factors
Step 5. Rank key jobs according to wages
assigned to each factor
Step 6. Compare the two sets of rankings to
screen out unusable key jobs
Step 7. Construct the job-comparison scale
Step 8. Use the job-comparison scale
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All
rights reserved. 11–17

You might also like