Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Molly Maher
2
Beginning the year-long action plan initially felt challenging and at times daunting. Our
cohort began by participating in a two or three week long deep dive. All day classes focused on
learning about structures, oppression, diverse perspectives, and included hands-on activities. We
found ourselves constantly engaged and pushing our biases and boundaries. Although the members
of the cohort were small, we each came from different backgrounds and held varying positions at
multiple schools. We were able to use each other’s experiences to sharpen our minds and lean on
one another when stressors arose. What became daunting about the course of ‘Leading Diverse
Equity Design’ and creating an ‘action plan’ to disrupt system; was that throughout the course you
began looking at your world differently because the material showed the pain, the oppression, the
oppressed, and those who either benefitted, created, or were a cog to the system. I can remember
walking through my personal, social, and professional life and becoming frustrated. I would hear
discriminatory language and behavior, witness white privilege and fragility, homophobia, politics
and policies that impacted people’s lives, and microaggressions. I soon moved from frustration to
anger...feeling defeated to figuring out how I could use an ‘action plan’ to make small positive
changes.
I began dialoguing with fellow professors and classmates, and they helped me narrow down
and rechannel some of my energy towards the area of gender inequity in the work environment. I
often experienced microaggressions in my workplace which made me feel devalued and minimized.
I observed that the majority of leadership positions are held by men even though more that half the
staff is female. There are no structures in place to support women who are interested in pursuing
leadership positions and no protocols to resolve gender related issues or microaggressions. Early in
the year, tension existed amongst our staff and I wondered if small changes could be implemented
to positively impact the work culture. Gender inequity continues to be a major source of negativity
3
affecting our workplace. After building strong rapports with many of the females at our school,
honest conversations began to occur. Many women began to share their experiences and concerns
directed at me that were disrespectful and unprofessional. For these reasons, I felt like this topic
I created an affinity group for the women at my workplace. We established our group and
the purpose of our meetings. We then build a space where each participant would safely name and
address issues related to behavior and microaggressive commentary towards women. We met twice
a month. One meeting was devoted to focusing on the logistical and content aspect of the group
while the other meeting was outside of school and served as a way for us to connect. We reviewed
content from Lean In by Sheryl Sandberg and Men Explain Things to Me by Rebecca Solnit. Next, I
created a professional development that would allow our participants to practice leadership skills
like problem solving, collaborating, and decision making through the mock scenario activity. After
the activity concluded, members were asked to share their own experiences anonymously (if they
felt comfortable or willing). The mock scenario was an important milestone for the group resulting
My goal and priority was to support female colleagues. Women needed an outlet to express
professionally, and collaborate best practices with one another. The equitable design was to fuel and
support women so that women could establish themselves as a voice in decision making processes
and make headway on leadership representation. I came to the conclusion that in order to truly
create change; we would have to clearly and concisely name the issues, be listened to and heard,
and hold a position of authority which can impact policies. Additionally, how female colleagues are
4
treated, talked to, approached, respected/disrespected serves as a strong message to our students.
Modeling appropriate professionalism and mutual respect amongst our teaching staff empowers
students to advocate for themselves when they experience derogatory comments and behaviors.
Challenges
I experienced group and personal challenges along the course of the year. Personally, I am
an extrovert and am able to easily connect with others. However, I struggle with articulating in
front of peers and other adults during presentations. I continue to work on public speaking by
practicing and putting myself into situations that force me to communicate in a group forum. I
began building my self-esteem and confidence by overly preparing for the meetings and saying a
couple affirmations. I relied heavily on my personality, being transparent with my purpose and
honest about my knowledge/lack of knowledge regarding the topic. After reading Elena Augilar’s
book, The Art of Coaching Teams, I realized that coaching teams had less to do with the person
leading the group but more about facilitating the group. I did not have to be the center of attention,
but more of an orchestrator of logistics, materials, and putting the members in the right headspace.
As a group, we faced attendance challenges which made it difficult to build trusting relationships to
share out. Time management became an obstacle when meeting, we had a lot of content to cover
and a limited time to discuss or process information. In response to continually running short on
time, I restructured our schedule and shortened excerpts from the text of the content I wanted the
group to review in advance. Meeting time could then be spent concentrating on one activity
(shortened the agenda and amount of content/activity). Lastly, my greatest challenge was naming
the issues and figuring out protocols to disrupt or resolve gender microaggressions. The group was
on the cusp of developing positive and effective protocols on addressing how staff reacts and
communicates when tensions exist or when problematic behaviors occur. The COVID pandemic
abruptly stopped our meetings and our progress. Our group will meet two more times virtually and
5
we are still in the process of figuring out what needs to happen in the future.
Pro Tips
If one is considered to do this work, I would narrow my focus and the purposes. I would
pick one or two aspects to do really well in relation to facilitating the group. Knowing that it takes
time for a group to gel and to feel safe with another, the first year of the group needs to be
designated to build connections and rapport. The second aspect would be to really listen to the
members of the group, and to take a step back from entertaining the group (entertainment may only
be a personal problem). Another contributing factor is involving your leaders into what you are
observing and doing and allocate specific all staff meetings to participate in a scenario activity.
Lastly, if I could do it all over again, I would not delegate some of the mediation and crucial
conversations to my leaders; since I am at the same level (perhaps there’s other reasons as well) as
the male colleagues who said microaggressive statements, when confronted or when the
conversation was brought up to them (individual basis) they still did not change. Overall, have fun
with the group you are creating and hosting; there is so little built in opportunities that you get to
connect with your coworkers with no agenda, enjoy the time to get to learn and rejuvenate!
6
References
Aguilar, E. (2013). The art of coaching: Effective strategies for school transformation. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Aguilar, E. (2016). The art of coaching teams: Building resilient communities that transform schools.
Coyle, D. (2018). The culture code: The secrets of highly successful groups. Bantam.
Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2016). An everyone culture: Becoming a deliberately developmental
Sanchez J. E. and Thorton B, (2010). Gender Issues in K-12 Educational Leadership. Advancing
Solnit, R., & Fernandez, A. T. (2015). Men explain things to me. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
7
Appendix B - Presentations
Appendix C - Plans
Appendix D - Rubric
Rubric