Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management (AIEM) 9(2) (2020) 20-26

Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management

(AIEM)
DOI: http://doi.org/10.7508/aiem.02.2020.20.26

ISSN: 2222-7059 (Print)

EISSN: 2222-7067 (Online)

ARTICLE

A SYSTEMATICAL REVIEW ON THE ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY MODEL WITH

CARBON EMISSION: 2010 - 2020
Bellachintya Reira Christata, Yosef Daryanto*

Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia

*
Corresponding Author E-mail: yosef.daryanto@uajy.ac.id

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ARTICLE DETAILS ABSTRACT

Article History:
Received 2 December 2020
Accepted 18 December 2020
Available online 25 December 2020
For about 10 years, research on low carbon inventory management grows significantly intending to optimize
the inventory system profit while maintaining the environmental effect in terms of carbon emissions. This paper
presents a systematic literature review on low carbon inventory studies, particularly for the single echelon
economic order quantity (EOQ) models. The study covers journal publications from 2010 until 2020 indexed
in the Scopus database. Thirty-three relevant articles are identified. Besides descriptive analysis, this research
categorizes the articles based on the inventory system affecting factors. The relationship between each factor and
the emission is explored. Finally, it identifies several research gaps to facilitate other researchers in extending
previous studies. The result recommends further research on the low carbon EOQ model considering the effect
of inventory issuing policy, multiple-warehouse, different payment methods, rework and remanufacturing of
product, and advanced technology adoption.

KEY WORDS

Economic Order Quantity, Carbon Emission, Literature Review.

1. INTRODUCTION review on low carbon supply chain management studies focusing on

One focus in the development of today’s global logistics system is the
effort to build a logistics system that is environmentally friendly in
the framework of sustainable development. The transportation and
industrial sector are the largest CO2 emissions contributors [1]. This
awareness inspired many researchers, industry, and other organizations
to develop inventory system models that can minimize the resulting
carbon emissions. Hua et al. investigated the methods of how industries
managing the inventory management carbon footprint [2]. The study
considered the effect of different carbon emission regulations, i.e. carbon
tax, carbon cap, and carbon trade on the inventory decisions. Bonney &
Jaber is the early researchers that incorporated carbon emission costs
into the economic order quantity decision model [3]. Meanwhile, Wahab
et al. studied the optimal ordering quantity in a cooperative supply chain
inventory system [4].
The emerging of low carbon supply chain inventory management topics
also inspires some researchers to do literature reviews of the current
development and potential future innovation. Su et al. conducted a
literature review on operation management with a carbon emission
consideration which is related to inventory management [5]. They
identified four groups of models that consider different carbon policies
in the research, i.e., economic order quantity, lot sizing, news vendor,
and supply chain model. Das & Jharkaria studied a broader context
by analyzing low carbon practices in supply chain operation, network
design, and collaboration [6]. The low carbon operation includes
inventory management similar to Su [5]. Chelly et al. also conducted a
the sources of emissions, types of emission policies, demand structure,
and planning horizon [7]. The study recommended an integrated
consideration of emissions from production, transportation, and
warehousing in the quantitative supply chain inventory model.
From the above existing literature studies, we identify a need to do a
narrow but deep literature study that focuses on the economic order
quantity (EOQ) model of a single echelon inventory system. Since the
development of the EOQ model at the beginning of the 20th century,
researchers have identified and incorporated many issues that affect the
optimum order decision regarding total cost or profit such as quality,
reliability, demand pattern, deterioration, etc. [8]. Early studies in low
carbon EOQ models had considered some of the key issues but others
had not. Therefore, our literature review will comprehensively identify
key EOQ issues that have and have not been studied. Further, this study
aims to summarize the effect of the issues that have been studied on
emissions and to find potential future studies to uncover the effects of
under-studied or un-studied EOQ issues. Following this introduction, we
present some basic theories in section 2. Section 3 explains the research
methodology of this literature review. Section 4 presents the finding
and discusses the result. Finally, the conclusion and some research
suggestions are summarized in section 5.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Global warming and other environmental issues influence the current
industry. Efforts to reduce the negative impact of business activities

Cite The Article: Bellachintya Reira Christata, Yosef Daryanto (2020). A Systematical Review on the Economic Order Quantity Model with Carbon Emission: 2010 - 2020.
Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management, 9(2): 20-26.
 Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management (AIEM) 9(2) (2020) 20-26

on the environment have become global awareness. No exception to
the negative impact of logistics activities. Many studies show that most
carbon emissions come from materials or energy consumed in the
production process [9]. In particular, knowledge of the effects of carbon
emissions on global warming has inspired many researchers, industry,
and other organizations to develop logistics systems, including inventory
systems that produce as few carbon emissions as possible. Bonney &
Jaber developed an inventory model that helped reflect environmental
needs [4]. Several factors are considered such as emissions from
transportation activities and the waste generated by each lot.
Carbon footprint can be used to measure the total amount of CO2 emissions
of an activity, such as ordering goods, producing, transporting, storing,
consuming, and disposing or recycling their products. In their study,
researchers calculated the cost of carbon emissions in their supply chain
decision models. Previous studies applied a direct accounting approach
to translating environmental aspects of carbon emissions into economic
parameters [10]. Battini et al. consider carbon emissions from storage in
warehouses, garbage collection, and disposal, and transportation both
internal and external [11]. Soleymanfar et al. developed an economic
order quantity model with carbon emissions and partial backorder
for emerging shortages [12]. Wee & Daryanto consider the effect of
the defective rate, while Taleizadeh et al. took into consideration the
discount on the EOQ model with carbon emissions [13,14]. The studies
above take into account the cost of emissions based on the carbon tax
system. There is much more research on the low carbon EOQ model,
hence our literature review will systematically study the current trend
to gain more understanding and to identify potential future studies.
A literature review study systematically identifies, evaluates, and
interprets the existing development of a study object or topic from
recorded documents [15]. The result can summarize certain patterns,
emerging themes, and probably existing problems. Moreover, by studying
the content, a literature review can contribute to a new theory. Mayring
identified common steps in the literature review, i.e. material collection,
descriptive analysis, category selection, and material evaluation [16].
The process, especially the analysis and evaluation may require several
looping processes as feedback and correction may exist [17].
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Following the literature review processes from Mayring, our research
consists of four stages as illustrated in Figure 1 [16]. The whole process
is willing to answer the following research questions:
RQ1. What key issues of the EOQ model are studied in the low carbon
EOQ literature [8]?
RQ2. How do the key issues relate to the emission level?
RQ3. What key issues of the EOQ model have not been studied? What
future studies are needed to get a complete understanding of the low
carbon EOQ model?
The material collection step targeted any articles published in the Scopus
indexed journal in the range of 2010 until September 2020. Hence, the
search was done through the Scopus database (www.scopus.com). This
arrangement is set to ensure the quality of the publication. Besides, the
material must be written in English.
The searches utilized the combination of the following keywords:
①(“EOQ” OR “Economic Order Quantity “ OR “Lot Size” OR “Lot Sizing”)
AND (“Carbon”)
②(“EOQ” OR “Economic Order Quantity “ OR “Lot Size” OR “Lot Sizing”)
AND (“Emission”)
The material collection is followed by some filtering procedure to
eliminate any duplication and irrelevant articles. A brief check is done

Figure 1: Research methodology.

Cite The Article: Bellachintya Reira Christata, Yosef Daryanto (2020). A Systematical Review on the Economic Order Quantity Model with Carbon Emission: 2010 - 2020.
Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management, 9(2): 20-26.
 Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management (AIEM) 9(2) (2020) 20-26
on the article’s title, keyword, and abstract. It is followed by a detailed
check on the introduction, problem description, and conclusion to verify
that the study develops a single echelon EOQ model considering carbon
emission. Any articles that deal with multi-echelon EOQ or supply chain
inventory model is expelled. At the end of this stage, relevant articles are
ready for further analysis and evaluation.
Following some descriptive analysis, our study investigated the key
EOQ issues in the literature based on Janssen et al. in category selection
[8]. Some additional issues are used concerning the carbon emission
regulations being studied. Finally, the material evaluation identifies
further findings to answer the research questions.
4. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 2 shows the result of the material collection process. In the
beginning, the total article from the keyword search is 1060. The first
screening resulted in 776 articles. After reading all the titles, keywords,
and abstracts, 650 articles did not relevant to the targeted inventory
model and being expelled. In the end, there are 33 articles relevant to
the single echelon EOQ with the carbon emission consideration.
Figure 3 illustrates the distribution of articles based on the year of
publication. The first article on EOQ with carbon emission was published
in 2011 by Bonney & Jaber and growing especially in the last 4 years.
Figure 4 shows the distribution of articles based on the keyword. Most
articles identify the method EOQ and use the term carbon emission,
Figure 2: Screening results in material collection.
Cite The Article: Bellachintya Reira Christata, Yosef Daryanto (2020). A Systematical Review on the Economic Order Quantity Model with Carbon Emission: 2010 - 2020.
Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management, 9(2): 20-26.
carbon tax, or sustainability. It is found that most studies work under
carbon tax regulation rather than carbon trade or carbon cap. Finally,
Table 1 lists the distribution of articles based on the journal where the
articles were published. The Journal of Cleaner Production is the leading
channel for this topic, closely followed by International Journal of
Production Economics, and then Sustainability. The number of articles
in other journals is quite similar.
Figure 3: Distribution across the timeframe
Figure 4: Distribution based on keywords.
From those 33 articles, a detailed review of each article is performed.
A categorical analysis is performed based on 16 key topics on the
inventory model proposed by Janssen et al. [8].
a. Pricing and discount
Pricing decisions and offered discounts will affect customer willingness
to buy. From the 33 reviewed articles, only 1 article discussed a discount
that is Taleizadeh et al. [13]. The study considered an all-units quantity
discount schedule. An algorithm was constructed to solve the effect of
the discount schedule, leading to some iterations. The study confirmed
the importance of purchasing cost in the profit function, but the study
did not show the relationship between the discount rate (also means
selling price) and the emission level.
b. Shortage
A shortage occurs when the quantity demanded is greater than the
inventory level. In certain situations, the customer cancels the order
and chooses another supplier, but sometimes customers are willing to
wait for the next supply which is called backorder. Four articles (12%)
already consider shortage and backorder situations, those are Lee et
al. (2017), Sarkar et al. (2018), Lin (2018), and Taleizadeh et al. Lee et
al. (2017) considered shortages as a result of uncertainty in demand,
delivery, and some other factors which cause lost sales [13,18-20]. The
 Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management (AIEM) 9(2) (2020) 20-26

Table 1: Distribution of Articles on the publication of journals.
Articles
Journal Title
(n=33)
Annals of Operations Research
Applied Mathematical Modelling
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Engineering Letters
European Journal of Operational Research
International Journal of Advanced Operations
Management
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Research
International Journal of Systems Science: Operations
& Logistics
International Transactions in Operational Research
Journal of Applied Science and Engineering
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Operations Research Letters
Sustainability
Systems Science and Control Engineering
Technological Forecasting & Social Change
Lee et al. (2017), Lin (2018), Kazemi et al. (2018), and Taleizadeh et al.
(2017).
h. Special product characteristics or customer request
2 This issue is considered only in Jin and Shi (2017).
1
i. Issue policies (FIFO, LIFO, etc.)
2
This topic is included in no article. In the reviewed articles, they had not
2
considered policy issues such as determining the optimum order of EOQ
1 with carbon emission problems.
1 j. Advances in technology
5 This issue is found only in Toptal et al (2013).
1
k. Distribution, routing, and transportation problem
1
This category discusses distribution, transportation, route selection,
and location problem activities in modeling the EOQ inventory system.
1
This issue is included in approximately 18% of papers, there are Bazorgi
1 (2016), Lee et al. (2017), Jin and Shi (2017), Zhao et al. (2017), Yassine
(2018), and As’ad et al. (2020).
6
1 l. Product and process reliability
1
Imperfect product is considered in approximately 12% of papers
2 [19]. They are Soleymanfar et al. (2015), Kazemi et al (2018), Sarkar
et al (2018), Yassine (2018). Rework is a situation in which a defected
3
product needs a re-production process to make it ideal. This topic is
1 included in approximately 9% of papers. They are Shu et al. (2017) and
Sarkar et al. (2018).
1
m. Two-and multi-warehouses

Two-and-multi-warehouse is a condition when the supply chain has two

study identified that the increase in shortage cost has a minimal effect
on the order quantity and total cost. The other articles considered
partial backorder
c. Multi-item inventory model [21-23]
This issue is considered in Bozorgi (2016), Lamba and Singh (2018),
and As’ad et al (2020). It means 91% of articles work for the single item
model.
d. Inflation and time value of money
The reviewed articles did not consider the effect of inflation and the time
value of money to determine the optimum order of EOQ with carbon
emissions problems.
or more warehouse facilities with a different function, and probably
there is transportation among the warehouses. So far, no articles
incorporate a multi-warehouse system. The models in the reviewed
articles only discuss a single-warehouse.
n. Emissions sources
In the emission source category, it was grouped into three matters. They
were emission sources from transportation, production, and inventory.
①Transport emissions are considered in approximately 61% of articles
[18-20]. They are Boney and Jaber (2011), Bouchery et al. (2012), Tian
et al. (2013), Gurtu et al. (2014), Bozorgi et al. (2014), He et al. (2015),
Soleymanfar et al. (2015), Bazorgi (2016), Purohit et al. (2016), Shu et al.
(2017), Lee et al. (2017), Jin and Shi (2017), Liao and Deng (2018), Wang
and Ye (2018), Lamba and Singh (2018), Lin (2018), Yassine (2018),
Zhang et al. (2019), Lamba and Singh (2019), As’ad et al. (2020).

e. Payment mechanism: credit and advance payment
This issue is included in the article from Sarkar et al. which is considered
a multi-trade-credit-period [19]. The study found that an offer on a
credit payment can reduce the retailer inventory as the customers may
order more. So far, no study consider advance payment together with
the effect of carbon emission.
f. Investment, promotion, and budget/financial constraint [18,20,24-26]
An investment is an asset or item acquired to generate income or
appreciation. In an economic sense, an investment is the purchase
of goods that are not consumed today but are used in the future to
create wealth. This topic is included in approximately 12% of papers.
The studies are conducted by Toptal et al (2013), Choi et al (2017) Lin
(2018), Cao et al. (2018), and Lee (2019).
②Production emissions are included in approximately 24% of articles
[29-32]. They are Shu et al. (2017), He et al. (2015), Jin and shi (2017),
Zhao et al. (2017), Zadjafar and Gholamian (2018), Tao and Xu (2019),
Phouratsamay and Cheng (2019), Wang and Choi (2020).
③Emissions from inventory holding are included in approximately 73%
of papers [18,19,33-37]. They are Boney and Jaber (2011), Tian et al.
(2013), Chen at al. (2013), Toptal et al. (2013), Bozorgi et al. (2014),
Hovelaque and Bironneau (2015), Soleymanfar et al. (2015), He et al.
(2015), Bazorgi (2016), Purohit et al. (2016), Lee et al. (2017), Sarkar et
al. (2018), Lin (2018), Lamba and Singh (2018), Liao and Deng (2018),
Kazemi et al. (2018), Wang and Ye (2018), Lamba and Singh (2019), Tao
and Xu (2019), Zhang et al. (2019), Phouratsamay and Cheng (2019),
Wang and Choi (2020), As’ad et al. (2020), Taleizadeh et al. (2020).
o. Emissions regulations

g. Outdating, waste, and shrinkage In the carbon emission legislation category, there are 3 categories found,
those are carbon cap, cap and trade, and carbon tax.
This topic is included in approximately 21% of papers [13,18,20,27]. The
studies are conducted by Soleymanfar et al. (2015), Shu et al. (2017), ①The carbon cap is considered in approximately 21% of papers [38-

Cite The Article: Bellachintya Reira Christata, Yosef Daryanto (2020). A Systematical Review on the Economic Order Quantity Model with Carbon Emission: 2010 - 2020.
Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management, 9(2): 20-26.
 Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management (AIEM) 9(2) (2020) 20-26

Table 2: Summary of key issues in all articles.

Key Issue
No Journals n o p
a b c d e f g h i j k l m
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Liao and Deng
1                       √   √   √ √ √ √    
(2018)
Wang and Ye
2                           √   √     √ √    
(2018)
Zadjafar and
3             √               √           √  
Gholamian (2018)
4 Tian et al. (2013)                           √   √         √  
Tao and Xu
5                             √ √ √ √ √ √    
(2019)
Kazemi et al.
6             √          √       √     √ √    
(2018)
Gurtu et al.
7                           √         √ √    
(2015)
Bouchery et al.
8                           √           √    
(2012)
Zhang et al.
9                           √   √   √     √  
(2019)
10 Lee (2019)           √                     √ √ √ √    
Toptal et al.
11           √       √           √ √ √ √ √    
(2013)
Taleizadeh et al.
12 √ √         √                 √   √ √    
(2020)
13 Shu et al. (2017)             √         √   √ √     √   √    
14 Cao et al. (2018)         √                        √   √    
15 He et al. (2014)                           √ √ √   √ √ √    
16 Lee et al. (2017)   √         √       √     √   √       √    
Sarkar et al.
17   √     √             √       √     √ √    
(2018)
18 Lin (2018)   √       √ √             √   √       √    
19 Chen at al. (2013)                               √ √   √ √    
Hovelaque and
20                               √   √ √ √    
Bironneau (2015)
21 Wu et al. (2017)               √     √     √ √       √    
Bozorgi et al.
22                           √   √       √    
(2014)
Soleymanfar et al.
23             √          √   √   √       √    
(2015)
Lamba and Singh
24     √                     √   √   √   √    
(2018)
25 Bazorgi (2016)     √               √     √   √       √    
Purohit et al.
26                           √   √   √     √  
(2013)
27 Choi et al. (2017)           √         √       √         √    
Boney and Jaber
28                           √   √       √    
(2011)
Lamba and Singh
29                           √   √ √   √   √
(2019)
Phouratsamay
30                             √ √   √     √
and Cheng (2019)
31 Yassine (2018)                     √  √   √         √ √    
Wang and Choi
32                             √ √     √   √  
(2020)
33 As’ad et al. (2020)     √               √     √   √ √         √

Cite The Article: Bellachintya Reira Christata, Yosef Daryanto (2020). A Systematical Review on the Economic Order Quantity Model with Carbon Emission: 2010 - 2020.
Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management, 9(2): 20-26.
 Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management (AIEM) 9(2) (2020) 20-26
40]. They are Toptal et al (2013), Chen et al (2013), Liao and Deng
(2018), Tao and Xu (2019), Lee (2019), Lamba and Singh (2019), As’ad
et al (2020).
②Cap-and-trade is studied in approximately 33% of papers. They are
Toptal et al. (2013), He et al. (2015), Hovelaque and Bironneau (2015),
Purohit et al. (2016), Shu et al. (2017), Cao et al. (2018), Lamba and
Singh (2018), Phouratsamay and Cheng (2019), Tao and Xu (2019),
Zhang et al. (2019), Lee (2019).
③The carbon tax is considered in approximately 45% of papers [13,19].
They are Toptal et al. (2013), Chen at al. (2013), Gurtu et al. (2014), He et
al. (2015), Hovelaque and Bironneau (2015), Lamba and Singh (2019),
Yassine (2018), Sarkar et al. (2018), Liao and Deng (2018), Wang and Ye
(2018), Kazemi et al. (2018), Tao and Xu (2019), Lee (2019), Wang and
Choi (2020), Taleizadeh et al. (2020).
p. Demand type
In a deterministic model, demand is known and can be predicted with
certainty [13,18,19,29,41-45]. Thus, all parameters and variables are
known or can be calculated with certainty. Deterministic is included
in approximately 76% of papers. They are Boney and Jaber (2011),
Bouchery et al. (2012), Toptal et al. (2013), Chen at al. (2013), Bozorgi et
al. (2014), Gurtu et al. (2014), Soleymanfar et al. (2015), He et al. (2015),
Hovelaque and Bironneau (2015), Bazorgi (2016), Jin and shi (2017),
Shu et al. (2017), Zhao et al. (2017), Lee et al. (2017), Liao and Deng
(2018), Wang and Ye (2018), Kazemi et al. (2018), Cao et al. (2018),
Sarkar et al. (2018), Lin (2018), Lamba and Singh (2018), Yassine
(2018), Tao and Xu (2019), Lee (2019), and Taleizadeh et al. (2020).
The stochastic model emphasizes that there are uncertainties on
demand [45-47]. It may fluctuate and may not predictable. Stochastic
demand is included in approximately 15% of papers. They are Tian et al.
(2013), Purohit et al. (2016), Zadjafar and Gholamian (2018), Zhang et
al. (2019). Also, recently there is a dynamic model in Lamba and Singh
(2019), Phouratsamay and Cheng (2019), As’ad et al (2020).
The above results show that several key issues/topics received little
attention; hence, this study shows potential further research on the
low carbon EOQ model considering the effect of pricing and discount,
multi items, different payment methods, rework and remanufacturing
products, and advance technology. In some literature, green technology
has been considered as a solution to reduce carbon emission. Therefore,
there is a need to incorporate this kind of technology in the EOQ model.
Further, no article considered the issue of inflation, inventory issuing
policy, and multiple-warehouse. It is highly recommended to incorporate
this issue in future research. For example, a multi-warehouse system
may have transportation among the facilities which results in more
emissions.
Further evaluation, study the relationship between carbon emission
costs and the total cost or profit. It can be summarized that as expected,
Wang and Ye found that by incorporating carbon emissions cost in the
cost function, the total cost is getting bigger [39]. Gurtu et al found that
the greater the carbon emissions, the greater the total cost [45]. From a
different perspective, Kazemi et al. found that the smaller the emission
cost the greater the profit [27]. Under a cap and trade regulation, Shu et
al found that the higher the carbon quota, the lower the total cost [36].
A clear insight into the effect of each issue on carbon emission reduction
is not yet gained. Most studies did not measure the total emissions or
expected emissions from the proposed model. Most of them only focus
on cost reduction or profit increase. However, some information can
be collected related to the results of the developed model in terms of
total cost and total emissions. For example, Chen et al. (2013) found
that the model results in smaller cost but greater emissions. A similar
result is identified by Purohit et al. (2015) and Tian et al. (2014). Wang
et al. (2020) found that the greater the profit, the smaller the carbon
emissions.
5. CONCLUSION AND FURTHER RESEARCH
This research investigates the development of the single-echelon EOQ
model which considers carbon emissions in its function. This study
identifies 33 journal articles from the Scopus database. Although the
Cite The Article: Bellachintya Reira Christata, Yosef Daryanto (2020). A Systematical Review on the Economic Order Quantity Model with Carbon Emission: 2010 - 2020.
Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management, 9(2): 20-26.
search process targeted publication from 2010, the publication starts in
2011 and gets increasing attention in the last four years. Further analysis
and evaluation are conducted based on several important issues in EOQ
models from Janssen et al. [8]. The EOQ models incorporated emissions
energy usage during the production processes, in delivering product,
and inventory holding. The most researcher considers a deterministic
demand and worked under carbon tax regulations.
Several key issues/topics received little attention; hence, this study
shows potential further research on the low carbon EOQ model
considering the effect of pricing and discount, multi items, different
payment methods, rework and remanufacturing products, and advance
technology. Further, no article considered the issue of inflation,
inventory issuing policy, and multiple-warehouse. Therefore, it is highly
recommended to incorporate this issue in future research. Besides, in
the future, a literature review is also needed for EOQ models in multi-
echelon supply chain systems.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study is supported and funded by Univesitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
This paper is an extended version from the paper presented in the
International Conference of Science Management Art Research
Technology 2020.
REFERENCES
[1] Türkay, M. Environmentally conscious supply chain management. In
Papageorgiou, L.G. & Georgiadis, M.C (Eds.), Supply chain optimization,
Weinheim: Wiley-Vch Verlag (2008).
[2] Hua, G., Cheng, T.C.E., Wang, S. Managing carbon footprints in
inventory management. International Journal Production Economics
(2011) 131: 178-185.
[3] Bonney, M., Jaber, M.Y. Environmentally responsible inventory
models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era, International
Journal of Production Economics (2011) 133: 43-53.
[4] Wahab, M.I.M., Mamun, S.M.H., Ongkunaruk, P. EOQ models for a
coordinated two-level international supply chain considering imperfect
items and environmental impact. International Journal of Production
Economics (2011) 134: 151-158.
[5] Su, L., Xiao, B., Suo, C., Yang Y. Models for operation management
under carbon policies-A review, Chemical Engineering Transactions
(2016) 51: 1159-1165.
[6] Das, C., Jharkharia, S. Low carbon supply chain: a state-of-the-art
literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
(2018) 29(2): 398-428.
[7] Chelly, A., Nouira, I., Frein, Y., Hadj-Alouane, A.B. On the consideration
of carbon emissions in modelling-based supply chain literature: the state
of the art, relevant features and research gaps, International Journal of
Production Research (2019) 57(15-16): 4977-5004.
[8] Janssen, L., Claus, T., Sauer, J. Literature review of deteriorating
inventory models by key topics from 2012 to 2015, International Journal
Production Economics (2016) 182: 86-112.
[9] Tsiliyannis, C.A. Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment
of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns, Resources,
Conservation and Recycling (2015) 103: 155-170.
[10] Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., Daskin, M. Carbon footprint and the management
of supply chains: Insights from simple models. IEEE Transactions on
Automation Science and Engineering (2013) 10(1): 99-116.
[11] Battini, D., Persona, A., Sgarbossa, F. A sustainable EOQ model:
Theoretical formulation and applications. International Journal of
Production Economics (2014) 149: 145-153.
[12] Soleymanfar, V.R., Taleizadeh, A.A., Zia, N.P. A sustainable lot-sizing
model with partial backordering, International Journal of Advanced
Operations Management (2015) 7(2): 157.
 Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management (AIEM) 9(2) (2020) 20-26
[13] Taleizadeh, A.A., Hazarkhan, B., Moon, I. Joint pricing and inventory
decisions with carbon emission considerations, partial backordering
and planned discount, Annals of Operations Research (2020): 1-11.
[14] Wee, H.M., Daryanto, Y. Imperfect quality item inventory models
considering carbon emissions. In Shah, N.H., & Mittal, M. (Eds.),
Optimization and inventory management. Singapore: Springer Nature
(2020).
[15] Fink, A. Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet
to paper. Sage Publications (2014).
[16] Mayring, P. Qualitative inhaltanalyse – Grundlagen und techniken
(Qualitative content analysis-Basics and techniques), 8th ed. Weinheim:
Beltz Verlag (2003).
[17] Seuring, S., Müller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual
framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner
Production (2008) 16: 1699-1710.
[18] Lee, S.K., Yoo, S.H., Cheong, T. Sustainable EOQ under lead-time
uncertainty and multi-modal transport, Sustainability (2017) 9: 476.
[19] Sarkar, B., Ahmed, W., Choi, S., Tayya, M. Sustainable inventory
management for environmental impact through partial backordering
and multi-trade-credit-period, Sustainability (2018) 10: 4761.
[20] Lin, H. Investing in transportation emission cost reduction on
environmentally sustainable EOQ models with partial backordering,
Journal of Applied Science and Engineering (2018) 21(3): 291-303.
[21] Bozorgi, A. Multi-product inventory model for cold items with
cost and emission consideration, International Journal of Production
Economics (2016) 176: 123–142.
[22] Lamba, K., Singh, S.P. Dynamic supplier selection and lot-sizing
problem considering carbon emissions in a big data environment,
Technological Forecasting & Social Change (2018) 144: 573-584.
[23] As’ad, R., Hariga, M., Shamayleh, A. Sustainable dynamic lot sizing
models for cold products under carbon cap policy, Computers &
Industrial Engineering (2020): 149.
[24] Toptal, A., Özlü, H., Konur, D. Joint decisions on inventory
replenishment and emission reduction investment under different
emission regulations, International Journal of Production Research
(2013) 52(1): 243–269.
[25] Zhao, Y.C., Choi, S.H., Wang, X.J., Qiao, A., Wang, S.Y. Production
and low-carbon investment analysis in make-to-stock supply chain,
Engineering Letters (2017) 25(1): 1-12.
[26] Cao, K., Xu, B., He, Y., Xu, Q. Optimal carbon reduction level and
ordering quantity under financial constraints, International Transactions
in Operational Research (2018).
[27] Kazemi, N., Abdul-Rashid, S.H., Ghazilla, R.A.R., Shekarian, E.,
Zanoni, S. Economic order quantity models for items with imperfect
quality and emission considerations, International Journal of Systems
Science: Operation & Logistics (2018) 5(2): 99-115.
[28] Bouchery, Y., Jemal, Z., Ghaffarl, A., Dallery, Y. Including sustainability
criteria into inventory models, European Journal of Operation Research
(2012) 222(2): 229-240.
[29] Bozorgi, A., Pazour, J., Nazzal, D. A new inventory model for cold
items that considers costs and emissions, International Journal of
Production Economics (2014) 155: 114–125.
[30] Chen, X., Benjaafar, S., Elomri, A. The carbon-constrained EOQ,
Cite The Article: Bellachintya Reira Christata, Yosef Daryanto (2020). A Systematical Review on the Economic Order Quantity Model with Carbon Emission: 2010 - 2020.
Advances In Industrial Engineering And Management, 9(2): 20-26.
Operation Research Letters (2012) 41: 172-179.
[31] He, P., Zhang, W., Xu, X., Bian, Y. Production lot-sizing and carbon
emissions under cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations, Journal of
Cleaner Production (2015) 103: 241–248.
[32] Hovelaque, V., Bironneau, L. The carbon-constrained EOQ model
with carbon emission dependent demand, International Journal
Production Economics (2014) 164: 285-291.
[33] Liao, H., Deng, Q. A carbon constrained EOQ model with uncertain
demand for remanufactured products. Journal of Cleaner Production
(2018) 199: 334–347.
[34] Phouratsamay, S.L., Cheng, T.C. E. The single-item lot-sizing problem
with two production modes, inventory bounds, and periodic carbon
emissions capacity, Operation Research Letters (2019) 47: 339-343.
[35] Purohit, A.K., Shankar, R., Dey, P.K., Choudhary, A. Non-stationary
stochastic inventory lot-sizing with emission and service level
constraints in a carbon cap-and-trade system, Journal of Cleaner
Production (2016) 113: 654–661.
[36] Shu, T., Wu, Q., Chen, S., Wang, S., Lai, K.K., Yang, H. Manufacturers’/
remanufacturers’ inventory control strategies with cap-and-trade
regulation, Journal of Cleaner Production (2017) 159: 11–25.
[37] Tao, Z., Xu, J. Carbon-regulated EOQ models with consumers’ low-
carbon awareness, Sustainability (2019) 11: 1004.
[38] Tian, Z., Huo, L., Shen, G. Carbon footprint and order quantity in
logistics, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (2014)
7(2): 475 – 490.
[39] Wang, S., Ye, B. A comparison between just-in-time and economic
order quantity models with carbon emissions, Journal of Cleaner
Production (2018) 187: 662–671.
[40] Wang, X., J., Choi, S., H. Stochastic Green Production Planning with
Lot Sizing, Engineering Letters (2020) 28 (2).
[41] Wu, P., Jin, Y., Shi, Y., Shyu, H. The impact of carbon emission costs
on manufacturers’ production and location decision, International
Journal of Production Economics (2017) 193: 193-206.
[42] Yassine, N. A sustainable economic production model: effects of
quality and emissions tax from transportation, Annals of Operation
Research (2018).
[43] Zadjafar, M.A., Gholamian, M.R. A sustainable inventory model by
considering environmental ergonomics and environmental pollution,
case study: Pulp and paper mills, Journal of Cleaner Production (2018)
199: 444–458.
[44] Zhang, R., Liu, Q., Wang, C. Inventory optimization of building
materials under the constraints of carbon emissions and stochastic
demand, Systems Science & Control Engineering (2019) 7(1): 146-157.
[45] Gurtu, A., Jaber, M.Y., Searcy, C. Impact of fuel price and emissions
on inventory policies, Applied Mathematical Modelling (2014) 39: 1202-
1216.
[46] Lee, J.Y. Investing in carbon emissions reduction in the EOQ model,
Journal of the Operational Research Society (2019).
[47] Lamba, K., Singh, S.P., Mishra, N. Integrated Decisions for Supplier
Selection and Lot-Sizing Considering Different Carbon Emission
Regulations in Big Data Environtment, Computers & Industrial
Engineering (2019).