Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Determining The Quality of Hotel Employees
Determining The Quality of Hotel Employees
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4883031
Abstract
The employees of any organization are an essential resource because they help execute the task and actively shape and create
the institution's reputation. Similarly, in the hotel industry, they are perhaps the most important resource. Therefore, we need
to understand the variables that shape and enhance the quality of a hotel employee. This paper will look at the work and
non-work-related variables that affect the quality of an employee. Along with this, we have also conducted a sample survey to
understand the consensus about those variables and their interplay with the quality of the employees. Communication skills
and responsiveness came up as the supreme skill for a good hotel employee during the survey.
Keywords: Quality, Hotel Employee, Reliability, Tangibility, Behavior, Appearance, and Communication Introduction
Introduction
Employees working in a Hotel make up the human resource of the organization. Their performance determines the success or
failure of the venture. This variable can be invested upon and polished to achieve the highest productivity of an organization.
According to studies conducted by Ulrich and colleagues in 1991, they found that the three existed a correlation between the
employees’ dedication to the hotel and customer satisfaction (Ulrich, 1991). Other similar studies show that there exists a
mutually beneficial relationship between the satisfaction of employees and customers (Hoseong Jeon, 2012). Therefore, the
quality of the employees, performance, and job satisfaction is a decisive factor in the successful running of a hotel. the quality of
the hotel employee is also a cultural construct because the expectancy from a hotel employee differs from country to country. for
example- American tourists and customers look for the ability to solve problems and speak English properly. Whereas those in
Taiwan, the customers look for politeness irrespective of the background of the customer (Kuo, 2007). Through this paper, this
variable will be assessed. The quality of a hotel employee will be analyzed on three variables. The variables will be behavior and
appearance of the hotel employee, tangibility available and provided, and reliability of the hotel employee.
Review of literature
The variables that affect the quality of hotel employees can be broadly categorized as “work variables” and “non-work
variables”. The work variables include work hours, stress, and the schedule of work (Ling, 2001). from the studies conducted by
researchers like Anderson and Ungemah (1999), it is evident that most employees prefer working in variable shifts. The reason
for this could be that with the increase in the prevalence of nuclear families and both the partners going to work, it becomes
more convenient to work in variable shifts. Work stress can also negatively affect the well-being of the employees. There is a
positive relationship between work-related stress and cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and overweight (Rödel, 2006).
Another work-related stress is the support network of the employee. This is especially potent for women who have to face work-
family conflict and cover ‘second shift’. This affects the performance of the employee (Asbari, 2020).
The non-work-related stress also affects the performance of an employee. They include gender, parental demand, and working
spouse (C.T. Chik, 2014). All of these factors work independently and interactively. Gender influences the type of work a
person performs. Women are more likely to enter into work that requires administrative or nurturing roles. These jobs are called
pink-collard jobs. It is difficult for them to move up the ladder as they are faced with what is sociologically called the “glass
ceiling”. They also have no access to mentors. Parental demands determine the support network of a person. If there is a
presence of a support network then that person is more likely to be able to handle stress and work effectively. Lastly, the
presence of a working spouse, makes it difficult for the person to establish a work-life balance. Therefore, policies like Creche
and daycare center make it easier for the employee to work.
18
In this paper, we will look at three types of variables that overlap between the work and non-work variables. Thisis elucidated in
graph 1.
work variables-
work stress, work
hours, and
scheduel
overarching variables-
behaviour and
apprearence, tangibility,
and relaibility
non-work
variables-
parental
demands,
working spouse,
and gender
19
building a sustainable attitude. The hotel can satisfy the guest, therefore it gains a client-centric reputation (Dražen Marić, 2016).
3. Reliability of the hotel employee
It refers to the time of providing service following the time that was promised (Fazlović, 2014). It is one of the central determining qualities of
a hotel. if a quest considers that the hotel isn’t reliable this would influence their perception of all the other aspects of service. The only way to
ensure reliability is by ensuring that the staff is meticulous and works on time. Another aspect of reliability is consistency i.e., the service
provided should be provided with the same efficiency over a while. Service should be flawless, provided on time (consistently), and the
employees should pay attention to the guest’s needs.
Methodology
To measure the quality of hotel employees we have looked at three dimensions of guest satisfaction. Guest satisfaction is the
benchmark on which the quality of both the hotel and the employee is judged. To measure these dimensions, we have created a
questioner
This questionnaire consists of 15 questions. The questions are as follows (table 1)-
Behavior and Appearance of the hotel Tangibility available and provided Reliability of the hotel employee
employee
1. The behavior of the hotel staff should instill
1. aromatic oil scents and candlesenhance 1.the A hotel should have staff thatdevotes
confidence in theguests. stay experience personal attention to its guests.
2. Hotel staff should constantlybe courteous2.to presence of spa, yoga or wellness retreat2.in Guests need to feel safe whenit comes to
the guests the hotel improves the stay experience communicating with the hotel staff.
3. bright nail polish and visible accessories3.on good water quality, including hot/cold water
3. A hotel should give individual attention to
the hotel staff isacceptable and water pressure, should be necessaryfor each guest.
4. loose hair, hair falling on the face, or facial the hotel 4. Hotel staff should always be prepared to
hair on the hotelstaff is acceptable 4. during rush hours is it okay to keep the respond to guestdemands
5. uniformed outfits for the hotelstaff should be guest's call on hold orcut the call 5. it is acceptable for the hotel staff to ask for
mandatory 5. pleasant ambiance including soothing music the feedback oropinions of the quest
and light helps
hotel employees perform better
The sample size consisted of 40 people between the ages of 30 to 40. the sex composition was 18 men and 22 women. They
were asked to rate these questions on a linear scale consisting of three dimensions- yes, no, and neutral.
20
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
number of responses
To assess the importance of appearance, we choose three questions that looked at three aspects of appearance- hair, uniform, and
nails. Just as above, people were supposed to mark where the posed appearance behavior is acceptable or not. Half of the people
agreed i.e., 20, that bright nail polish is unacceptable. Whereas 27 people agreed that unkept hair is unacceptable. 27 people
also agreed that uniforms should be mandatory for hotel staff. This result is elucidated in graph 3.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
number of responses
21
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
number of response
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
number of responses
22
3. professional attire
5. responsible behaviour
Conclusion
Through this paper, we have tried to elucidate the variables that affect the impression of a hotel employee and thereafter
determine their quality. Through the study of past literature and conducting a sample survey, we have determined the variables
that affect the quality of hotel employees. These variables include- communication and responsiveness, reliability, professional
attire and behavior, and amenities available in the hotel. the effect of communication is greatest because all of the participants
agreed unanimously to the same. One can effectively conclude that personality type also considerably affects the efficiency of
the employee. Most of the participants believe that pleasant personality types who have the traits of cooperation and cordialness
are of utmost importance. besides this, another important factor is the quality of leadership and self-efficacy (Shaoping Qiua,
2020). Leadership determines to what extent will the potential of the employee be used. A good leader will identify the lacking
in their staff and help them improve in that field. They would also place people in different positions according to the abilities of
the person. Self-efficacy is another tenant of any efficient employee. It refers to a person’s belief that they can or cannot perform
a task. People high on self-efficacy are seen in a favorable light because they emit an aura of confidence and charisma.
References
[1]. Asbari, I. B. (2020). The Effect of work-Family conflict on Job Satisfaction and Performance: A Study of Indonesian Female
Employees. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 6724-6748.
[2]. C.T. Chik, F. I. (2014). Theory and Practice in Hospitality and Tourism Research. Taylor & Francis. Dražen Marić, V. M. (2016).
Analysis of Tangible and Intangible Hotel Service Quality Components. 22.
[3]. Fazlović, S. F. (2014). MEASURING SERVICE QUALITY IN HOTEL INDUSTRY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA.
[4]. Prihvaćeno za tisak, 157.
[5]. Hoseong Jeon, B. C. (2012). The relationship between employee satisfaction and customer satisfaction. Journal of Services
Marketing, 332-341.
[6]. Kuo, C.-M. (2007). The Importance of Hotel Employee Service Attitude and the Satisfaction of International Tourists. The Service
Industries Journal, 1073-1085.
23
[7]. Ling, J. S. (2001). Work-family conflict of women entrepreneurs in Singapore. Women in Management Review, 204-221.
[8]. Martin, L. a. (2002). Interview as a selection tool for entry-level hospitality employees. Journal of Human Resources in
Hospitality and Tourism, 185-203.
[9]. Panda, T. K., & Das, S. (2014). The Role of Tangibility in Service Quality and Its Impact on External Customer Satisfaction: A
Comparative Study of Hospital and Hospitality Sectors. IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 53-69.
[10]. Pettinger, L. (2008). Developing Aesthetic Labour: The Importance of Consumption. International Journal of WorkOrganisation
and Emotion.
[11]. Rödel, J. S. (2006). Work stress and health risk behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 473-481.
[12]. Shaoping Qiua, L. M. (2020). How servant leadership and self-efficacy interact to affect service quality in the hospitality industry: A
polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Tourism Management.
[13]. Tahir Albayrak, M. C. (2010). Relationships of the Tangible and Intangible Elements of Tourism Products with Overall
Customer Satisfaction. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 143.
[14]. Ulrich, D. H. (1991). Employee and Customer Attachment: Synergies for Competitive Advantage. Human ResourcePlanning, 89–
103.
[15]. Warhurst, C. N. (2000). Aesthetic labour in interactive service work: some case study evidence from the ‘New’ Glasgow.
[16]. The Service Industries Journal, 1–18.
24