You are on page 1of 9

Journal of Polymer Research (2020) 27: 74

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02050-3

ORIGINAL PAPER

Antibacterial, antibiofilm and cytotoxic activities of biogenic


polyvinyl alcohol-silver and chitosan-silver nanocomposites
Omnia M. Abdallah 1 & Khaled Z. EL-Baghdady 2 & Mostafa M. H. Khalil 3 & Mervat I. El Borhamy 4,5 & Gamal A. Meligi 3

Received: 19 September 2019 / Accepted: 21 February 2020 / Published online: 27 February 2020
# The Polymer Society, Taipei 2020

Abstract
Using biogenically synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) by Enterobacter cloacae Ism 26 (KP988024); Polyvinyl Alcohol-
Silver (PVA-Ag) and Chitosan-Silver (CS-Ag) nanocomposites were prepared by augmentation. Thermal stability, AgNPs
distribution and concentration within nanocomposites were characterized using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning
electron microscope/energy dispersive x-ray (SEM/EDX) and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Nanocomposites films
showed higher thermal stability than pure polymers, different AgNPs concentrations with homogenous distribution.
Antibacterial, antibiofilm and cytotoxic activities of nanocomposites films were studied against Multi Drug Resistant (MDR)
bacteria including Staphylococcus epidermidis (S.e), Staphylococcus aureus (S.a), Escherichia coli (E.c) and Klebsiella
pneumoniae (K.p). PVA-Ag nanocomposite showed larger zones of inhibitions and higher antibiofilm activities than CS-Ag
nanocomposite against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. AgNPs solution, PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites
showed low cytotoxic activities against Huh-7 liver cells and IC50 values of 263.20 μg ml−1, 1185.07 μg ml−1 and
119.85 μg ml−1, respectively. PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites films showed enhanced thermal stability and biological
properties that qualify them for different biomedical applications.

Keywords Nanocomposites . Films . Antibacterial . Antibiofilm . Cytotoxicity . Polyvinyl alcohol . Chitosan

Introduction decomposes under aerobic and anaerobic conditions into car-


bon, hydrogen and oxygen. PVA is approved by food and
PVA and CS are gaining a lot of research interest due to their drug administration (FDA) to be used in the food industry,
biodegradability and biocompatibility applications [1]. PVA is textile, paper products and medical devices [2, 3]. It can be
a synthetic water-soluble, biodegradable polymer. It administrated orally or intravenously and removed with no
side effects [4–6]. CS is the second most abundant natural
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article available polymer, after cellulose. It’s a linear biopolymer that
(https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02050-3) contains supplementary can be isolated from crustacean shells, fungi cell walls or
material, which is available to authorized users.
chemically synthesized from chitin [7]. CS is a highly viscous
polymer, soluble in dilute acids (1% acetic acid) and can be
* Omnia M. Abdallah
omniamohamed990@gmail.com hydrolyzed by the human enzymatic system into nontoxic
products [8]. PVA and CS are considered unique carriers for
1
different nanoparticles [9]. Their high mechanical strength,
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International
University, Cairo, Egypt
biocompatibility and crosslinking properties make them able
2
to form nanocomposite films and hydrogels. They are one of
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams
University, Cairo, Egypt
the green environmentally friendly choices for many biomed-
3
ical and industrial applications due to their biological activities
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University,
Cairo, Egypt
[10, 11]. They have been used in drug delivery, wound dress-
4
ing, filtration, biosensors, biological scaffolds, contact lenses,
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Misr
International University, Cairo, Egypt
tissue engineering, grafts and implants [1, 3, 12, 13]. Recent
5
researches showed that addition of nanoparticles to polymers
International Medical Center, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory,
Cairo, Egypt
enhanced the biological properties of polymers and offered
74 Page 2 of 9 J Polym Res (2020) 27: 74

wider scope of applications [14, 15]. Silver is one of the most and AgNPs concentration per disc was recorded using Atomic
important nanoparticles that have been augmented with poly- absorption spectroscopy (AAS) (Savant, GBC Scientific
mers. The biological route for AgNPs synthesis represents the equipment, Australia) at a cathode Ag lamp with wavelength
future environmentally friendly method, where other physical 328.1 nm and Slit Width 0.2 nm [21], all measurements were
and chemical methods use high amount of energy and toxic done thrice.
solvents, causing limitations on the synthesized nanoparticles
biomedical applications [16]. AgNPs showed antibacterial Antibacterial activity of PVA-Ag and CS-Ag
properties against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria nanocomposites
[17, 18]. In this paper we augmented biogenically synthesized
AgNPs with PVA and CS polymer matrices to synthesize The antibacterial activity of PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposite
nanocomposite films then studied their antibacterial, were tested against ten multi drug resistant (MDR) bacteria kind-
antibiofilm and cytotoxic activities. ly provided by the International Medical Center, Microbiology
Laboratory, Cairo. The strains were three isolates of
Staphylococcus aureus (S.a 1, S.a 2 and S.a 3), one isolate of
Experimental Staphylococcus epidermidis (S.e 1), four isolates of Klebsiella
pneumoniae (K.p 1, K.p 2, K.p 3 and K.p 4) and two isolates
Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles of Escherichia coli (E.c 1 and E.c 2). Discs (6 mm) of PVA, CS,
PVA-Ag, CS-Ag and AgNPs loaded on Whatman filter paper No
Biologically synthesized AgNPs were previously prepared in 1 (20 μg AgNPs discs) were placed on Muller Hinton agar
our lab [18] under light conditions using Enterobacter cloacae (Oxoid Ltd., England) plates inoculated with 106 CFU ml−1 of
Ism 26 (KP988024). Synthesized AgNPs solution was obtain- 24 h bacterial culture then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h [16].
ed in powder form by lyophilization using Edwards model
RV5, England.
Antibiofilm activity
Synthesis of PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites
The ability of PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites to inhibit
biofilm formation was tested against strong biofilm forming
PVA (alpha cheimeka, India) (10 g) was mixed with 90 ml
multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. The control for this exper-
deionized water by magnetic stirring at 100 rev min−1 on a hot
iment was PVA, CS and AgNPs (20 μg ml−1). The biofilm
plate at 90 °C for 3 h. Then, 0.1% (w/v) of biosynthesized
forming bacteria were grown at 37 °C for 24 h in 10 ml tryptic
AgNPs were added and stirred for 4 h. Each 20 ml of the
soy broth (TSB) (Merck, Germany) with 1% glucose. Then
resulted mixture was casted into a glass petri-dish and placed
200 μl of each diluted bacterium (1:100) were inoculated into
in desiccator for 24 h. The plates were kept at 60 °C for 4 h to
96 well microtitre plate previously containing nanocomposite
remove any excess water or residuals [19]. Chitosan (alpha
discs. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h at static
cheimeka, India) (0.4 g) was added to 20 ml of acetic acid
conditions. After incubation, each well was washed thrice with
(1%) and magnetically stirred for 1 h at 60 °C, then 0.1% (w/v)
phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.2) then left to dry for 30 min. at
of AgNPs was added and further stirred for 2 h. This mixture
room temperature. Crystal violet solution (200 μl of 0.1% w/v)
was cast into a plastic petri-dish then put in oven at 60 °C for
was added and left at room temperature for 30 min. Plates were
16 h to remove any excess solvents [20]. These nanocompos-
washed and left to dry for 30 min. Finally, 100 μl of ethanol
ite films were used for further experiments and pure PVA and
(96%) was added to each well to extract stained bound biofilm
CS films were used as control.
and left for 30 min. The absorbance of crystal violet was mea-
sured at 490 nm by Microplate Reader (ELx808™ Absorbance,
Characterization PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites
Biotek, USA). Biofilm reduction was measured and compared
to control [22, 23]; also the percentage of inhibition was calcu-
PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites films were tested for
lated using the following equation:
their thermal stability using thermogravimetric analysis
(TGA) (SDT-Q600 Simultaneous TGA / DSC, USA). The
change in sample mass was recorded against a programmed %of inhibition ¼ 1–ðOD of nanocomposite=OD of negative controlÞ  100 ð1Þ

heating sequence from 20 to 400 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere


at a heating rate of 20 °C min−1. The presence and distribution OD of is the optical density of sample.
of AgNPs within PVA and CS nanocomposite were investi- nanocomposite
gated by SEM/EDX (JEOL JSM-5500 LV, Japan). OD of negative is the optical density of control biofilm
Nanocomposites films were cut into discs (6 mm diameter) control forming bacteria.
J Polym Res (2020) 27: 74 Page 3 of 9 74

Cytotoxicity (MTT- assay) Characterization of PVA-Ag and CS-Ag


nanocomposites
Cytotoxic effect of AgNPs solution, PVA-Ag and CS-Ag
nanocomposites was tested against cancer human liver EDX and TGA analyses were used to characterize PVA-Ag
cells (Huh7) using a solution of 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2- and CS-Ag nanocomposite films. EDX spectrum (Fig. 1a, b)
thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT es- showed strong peaks of silver with high content of 59.71 ±
say). Twelve dilutions of each sample were prepared 2.59 and 50.6 ± 0.24 atom % for PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nano-
using two-fold dilution (25,000 μg ml−1 to composites, respectively. Carbon and nitrogen were excluded
12.20 μg ml−1) and tested against Huh7 cell line in 96- to increase clarity of peaks. Small amounts of other elements,
well plate (106 cells per well). Plates were incubated at such as copper, silica, aluminum and zinc were detected. PVA-
37 °C under 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h. After incuba- Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites can absorb and stabilize
tion, 50 μl MTT (5 mg ml−1) was added and incubated for AgNPs by the hydroxyl and amino groups present in PVA
additional 6 h. Finally, the colored product (formazan) and CS polymer structure [26, 27]. CS-Ag nanocomposite
was dissolved in 100 μl DMSO (0.1%) (Sigma–Aldrich, showed relative higher AgNPs concentration trapped inside
StLouis, MO). Percentage of cells viability and IC 50 the polymer matrix than that present in PVA-Ag nanocompos-
values (the inhibitory concentration needed to cause ite. This difference may be due to the variance in number
50% cell death mm) were calculated by measuring the between AgNPs and functional groups present in PVA and
absorbance of the MTT-treated cells at 570 nm using CS to stabilize, hydroxyl and amino groups, respectively
Microplate Reader (ELx808™ Absorbance, Biotek, [26], furthermore the 3D structure of CS with its swelling
USA) [24]. Untreated cells were used as control with and expansion properties allowed more AgNPs to be trapped
100% viability and percentage of cell viability was calcu- in CS matrix [28]. EDX spectra of PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nano-
lated using the following equation: composites showed homogeneity and well distribution of
AgNPs indicating the ability of PVA and CS to act as excellent
%o f cell viability hosts for AgNPs encapsulation [5].
¼ ðAbsorbance o f sample=Absorbance of control cellsÞ Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that PVA-Ag
and CS-Ag nanocomposites had higher thermal stability than
 100 pure polymers (Fig. 1c, d). The onset temperature at 10%
ð2Þ weight loss of PVA-Ag nanocomposites was 11 °C higher
than that of pure PVA and at 20% weight loss, the difference
became 5 °C, in favor to PVA-Ag nanocomposite. However,
the peak temperature at 50% weight stayed the same for both
Statistical analysis PVA and PVA-Ag nanocomposite. For CS-Ag nanocompos-
ite, at 10% weight loss, the onset temperature was 24 °C
All experiments were performed thrice where n = 3 and results higher than that of CS and at 20% weight loss, the difference
were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), one way increased to 46 °C. The peak temperature at 50% weight was
analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using SPSS 38 °C higher for CS-Ag nanocomposite film. Consequently,
software, where level of significant difference was set at TGA results indicated that addition of AgNPs to PVA and CS
p < 0.05. enhanced thermal stability and delayed thermal decomposi-
tion. CS-Ag nanocomposite showed higher thermal stability
and delayed thermal decomposition than PVA-Ag nanocom-
posite. This could be due to the higher AgNPs concentration
Results and discussion present in CS-Ag nanocomposite, this was also documented
by Ali et al. [29] and George et al. [26] who showed similar
Biosynthesis of AgNPs findings. Other study conducted by González-Campos et al.
[30] demonstrated higher annealing temperature for PVA-Ag
AgNPs biosynthesized by Enterobacter cloacae Ism 26 were nanocomposite using 5 wt% AgNPs. Augmentation of AgNPs
spherical shaped with average size 15 nm (Fig. S1). These has interfered with polymer matrix chain and delayed the de-
AgNPs were augmented with PVA and CS polymers. PVA- composition process by suppressing or reducing PVA and CS
Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites had uniform dispersal of chains mobility, therefore reducing chains transfer and caus-
brown color implying the uniform distribution of the AgNPs ing nanocomposite degradation at higher temperatures than
throughout the polymer matrices (Figs. S2 and S3); this was that of pure polymer [31]. Atomic absorption spectroscopy
similar to previous studies carried out by Chandran et al. [25]. analysis and standard curve measurements of PVA-Ag and
74 Page 4 of 9 J Polym Res (2020) 27: 74

Fig. 1 Characterization of nanocomposite: EDX analysis spectrum: (a) PVA-Ag nanocomposite (b) CS-Ag nanocomposite and TGA Curves: (c) PVA
film and PVA-Ag nanocomposite, (d) CS film and CS-Ag nanocomposite, showing their thermal stability

CS-Ag nanocomposites indicated that the concentration of between 33 ± 3 and 21 ± 1 mm, followed by CS-Ag nanocom-
AgNPs augmented in 6 mm discs was 14 ± 2 and 21 ± 3 μg posite (14 ± 2 and 8 ± 0.5 mm) (Fig. 2). PVA-Ag and CS-Ag
per disc, respectively. Indicating that AgNPs concentration per nanocomposites demonstrated maximum activity against S.e
disc varies according to polymer type and the nanoparticles 1. Meanwhile, minimum activity was detected against S.a 3
ability to augment with polymer matrix. and K.p 2. AgNPs and antibiotics discs showed significantly
same values of inhibition against both Gram-positive and
Antimicrobial activity Gram-negative bacteria. Control PVA discs showed well dif-
fusion through agar media with no antibacterial activity, sim-
The antimicrobial activity of pure PVA, CS, 20 μg AgNPs ilar results were found by Zhang et al. [5], Aktürk et al. [32]
discs and the nanocomposites (PVA-Ag and CS-Ag) were and Tripathi et al. [16]. However, control CS discs showed
tested against MDR bacteria using the disk agar diffusion antimicrobial activity against S.e 1 and S.a 1 (Gram-positive)
assay. PVA- Ag nanocomposite showed the highest significant and K.p 4, E.c 1 and E.c 2 (Gram-negative) bacteria, with
antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram- inhibition zones diameter ranging from 12 ± 1 and 14 ±
negative bacteria with a diameter of inhibition zones ranging 2 mm (Table 1) but not significantly effective as CS-Ag
J Polym Res (2020) 27: 74 Page 5 of 9 74

(a) (b) (c)

(d) (e) (f)

Fig. 2 Antimicrobial activity of CS-Ag and PVA-Ag nanocomposites PVA-Ag nanocomposite and pure PVA discs before incubation (d) and
against MDR bacteria, showing CS-Ag nanocomposite and pure CS discs after incubation against S.a 3 (e), E.c 1 (f)
before incubation (a) and after incubation against S.a 2 (b), S.a 3(c), and

nanocomposite, similar to previous studies conducted by to different factors such as size, shape and concentration of
Thaya et al. [33] and Kalaivani et al. [7]. Antibacterial activity nanoparticles [34, 35]. AgNPs synthesized in this study had an
of PVA-Ag, CS-Ag nanocomposites and AgNPs discs against average size of 15 nm and Park et al. [36] indicated that small
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria could be attributed sized AgNPs can cause antibacterial activity by penetrating

Table 1 Showing inhibition zones diameter against different MDR bacteria

S.e 1 S.a 1 S.a 2 S.a 3 K.p 1 K.p 2 K.p 3 K.p 4 E.c 1 E.c 2

Inhibition zone (mm)


PVA-Ag nanocomposite 33 ± 3a 29 ± 1a 26 ± 1a 21 ± 1a 28.5 ± 0.5a 23.5 ± 1.5a 26 ± 1a 24 ± 1.5a 23 ± 1.5a 23 ± 2.5a
PVA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CS-Ag nanocomposite 14 ± 2b 12.5 ± 1.5b 8 ± 0.5c 10.5 ± 0.5b 11.5 ± 0.5c 0 11.5 ± 0.5b 12 ± 1b 13 ± 1b 12 ± 1b
CS 12.5 ± 2.5c 12 ± 1b 0 0 0 0 0 12 ± 2b 14 ± 2b 13 ± 1.5b
AgNPs Disc (20 μg) 8.5 ± 0.5d 12 ± 1b 13 ± 1b 12 ± 2b 16 ± 1.5b 14 ± 2b 15 ± 1b 14 ± 1b 11 ± 0.5c 13.5 ± 0.5b
Levofloxacin 13 ± 1cd 12 ± 2b 14 ± 3b 11 ± 3b 11 ± 2d 9 ± 1c 8 ± 2c 9 ± 1c 12 ± 1.5c 12 ± 2b
Vancomycin 11 ± 1d 12 ± 1.5b 12 ± 2b 10 ± 1.5b NA NA NA NA NA NA
Erythromycin 11 ± 2d 10 ± 1b 12 ± 2b 12 ± 1.5b NA NA NA NA NA NA
Imipenem NA NA NA NA 13 ± 2d 12 ± 1.5b 13 ± 2.5b 11 ± 2c 10 ± 2c 10 ± 1.5b

PVA: polyvinyl alcohol, CS: Chitosan, S. e: Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. a: Staphylococcus aureus, k. p: Klebsiella pneumonia, E. coli: Esherichia
coli, NA: not applied, results calculated are means ± SD, a-d superscript means are statistically significance at p˂0.05, control vs. treated
74 Page 6 of 9 J Polym Res (2020) 27: 74

the cell membrane or attaching to the cell membrane surface against S.e 1, S.a 1, K.p 2 and E.c 1. PVA-Ag, CS-Ag nano-
and disturbing its function. PVA-Ag nanocomoposite highest composites and AgNPs showed antibiofilm activity against all
significant activity of could be explained by its solubility, tested biofilm forming bacteria (Fig. 3). Augmentation of PVA
better diffusion through agar and continuous release of or CS with AgNPs showed significant inhibition of biofilm
AgNPs of PVA films across the medium, carrying AgNPs to formation. PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposite, showed sig-
further extent and causing larger inhibition zones, as explained nificantly the same percentage of biofilm inhibition against S.e
by Radheshkumar and Mu [37]; Zhang et al. [5]. Similar re- 1 (92% and 90%) and S.a 1 (78% and 76%), respectively.
sults were recorded against Salmonella typhimurium [16], While, against K.p 2, E.c 1 and E.c 2; nanocomposites showed
E.coli and S. aureus [5, 32]. Patil et al. [19] suggested that inhibition percentages ranging from 71 to 77% and 54–62%.
nanocomposites have higher antibacterial activity compared PVA-Ag, CS-Ag nanocomposite and AgNPs showed signifi-
to nanoparticles alone due to the polymer’s ability to contin- cant high percentages of antibiofilm activity against Gram-
uously release Ag in the surrounding medium. This can ex- positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Similarly previous stud-
plain the significant high inhibition values recorded by PVA- ies demonstrated high antibiofim activity against
Ag nanocomposite in this study compared to AgNPs discs. S. epidermidis, P. aeruginosa and E.coli [32, 43, 44]. The
CS-Ag nanocomposite showed lower antibacterial activity continuous release of AgNPs from CS-Ag and PVA-Ag nano-
displayed by smaller inhibition zones; however, Kumar- composites can explain their antibiofilm activity, where they
Krishnan et al. [20] showed that CS-Ag nanocomposite ex- inhibit exopolysaccharide synthesis, which represents the bac-
hibited high bactericidal activity against S. aureus and E. coli. terial main defense system in biofilm forming bacteria [28,
Other studies showed that CS tend to aggregate and trap nano- 45]. Furthermore, AgNPs concentration in nanocomposites
particles inside its structure leading to lower efficacy against play an important role in biofilm inhibition percentage where
bacterial isolates [38, 39]. Nanocomposites showed stronger its directly proportional to antibiofilm activity [15, 46].
antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria compared Consequently the use of PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites
to Gram-negative bacteria due to the difference in their cell is suggested as early stage preventive agents against biofilm
wall structure [40], where lipopolysaccharides present in the formation during healing stages. This was also reported by
Gram-negative bacteria cell wall can block some antimicrobi- Abdelgawad et al. [47] who used a combination of CS-PVA-
al agents from passing or attaching to cell wall, therefore Ag nanocomposite in wound treatment.
preventing bacterial cell death [14, 41, 42].

Cytotoxicity (MTT) assay


Antibiofilm activity
PVA-Ag, CS-Ag nanocomposites and AgNPs were tested for
PVA-Ag, CS-Ag nanocomposites, PVA, CS and AgNPs were their cytotoxic activity using MTT assay. Percentage of cell
tested for their antibiofilm activity against five bacterial iso- viability showed an inverse relation with tested samples con-
lates (S.e 1, S.a 1, K.p 2, E.c 1 and E.c 2) that showed the centration. The cell viability increased as the concentrations of
highest significant biofilm formation. PVA films showed no PVA-Ag, CS-Ag and AgNPs decreased till reaching the IC50
antibiofilm activity against all tested biofilm forming bacteria; (Fig. 4). IC 5 0 was found to be 263.20 μg ml − 1 ,
however, CS showed significant higher antibiofilm activity 1185.07 μg ml−1 and 119.85 μg ml−1 for biogenic AgNPs,

Fig. 3 Antibiofilm activity (a) PVA-Ag nanocomposite and (b) CS-Ag nanocomposite against MDR bacteria. Results expressed as mean ± SD (*)
P˂0.05 vs. control
J Polym Res (2020) 27: 74 Page 7 of 9 74

Fig. 4 Cytotoxic effect of


biogenic AgNPs and PVA-Ag,
CS-Ag nanocmoposites against
human liver cell line (Huh-7)
using MTT assay. Results
expressed as mean ± SD (P˂0.05
vs. control)

PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposites, respectively. It was ob- Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of
Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University.
vious that the IC50 of PVA-Ag nanocomposite was significant-
ly higher than that of CS-AgNPs and but less significant to
that of AgNPs. These results indicated that PVA-Ag nanocom-
Compliance with ethical standards
posite had the lowest significant cytotoxicity against Huh-7
Conflict of interest The authors have no conflict of interest in publishing
cell line and the highest IC50 value, indicating high biosafety, this manuscript.
compared to other samples. Cytotoxic activity of AgNPs and
nanocomposites on different human cells is essential for their
biomedical applications. Other studied showed lower IC50
values and higher lethal concentrations against different ani- References
mal [24, 48] and human cells [28, 49–51]. Cytotoxic activity
1. Lin MC, Lou CW, Lin JY, Lin TA, Chou SY, Chen YS, Lin JH
can be related to different factors such as type of cells tested, (2018) Using spray-coating method to form PVA coronary artery
nanoparticles size, nanoparticles synthesis method, nanoparti- stents: structure and property evaluations. J Polym Res 25:1–9.
cle aggregation rate and type of polymer used in nanocompos- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-018-1497-3
ite [45, 52]. 2. Baker MI, Walsh SP, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD (2012) A review of
polyvinyl alcohol and its uses in cartilage and orthopedic applica-
tions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100(B):1451–1457.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32694
3. Ben Halima N (2016) Poly (vinyl alcohol): review of its promising
Conclusion applications and insights into biodegradation. RSC Adv 6:39823–
39832. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA05742J
4. Demerlis CC, Schoneker DR (2003) Review of the oral toxicity of
PVA-Ag and CS-Ag nanocomposite films were synthesized
polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) - PDF free download. Food Chem Toxicol
by augmentation with biosynthesized AgNPs, using 41:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00258-2
Enterobacter cloacae Ism 26 (KP988024). PVA-Ag and CS- 5. Zhang Z, Wu Y, Wang Z, Zou X, Zhao Y, Sun L (2016) Fabrication
Ag nanocomposites showed higher thermal stability than pure of silver nanoparticles embedded into polyvinyl alcohol (Ag/PVA)
PVA and CS films. AgNPs showed homogenous dispersion composite nanofibrous films through electrospinning for antibacte-
rial and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) activities.
through PVA and CS matrices, preventing the nanoparticles Mater Sci Eng C 69:462–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.
from aggregation. These nanocomposites films enhanced sig- 2016.07.015
nificantly the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of 6. Ferrández-Rives M, Beltrán-Osuna ÁA, Gómez-Tejedor JA,
AgNPs causing efficient eradication of bacterial and biofilm Ribelles JLG (2017) Electrospun PVA/bentonite nanocomposites
mats for drug delivery. Materials (Basel) 10:1–17. https://doi.org/
growth of multi drug resistant clinical isolates.
10.3390/ma10121448
Nanocomposites showed significant low cytotoxicity against 7. Kalaivani R, Maruthupandy M, Muneeswaran T et al (2018)
Huh-7 liver cells. These results highlighted the enhanced bio- Synthesis of chitosan mediated silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) for
logical activities of nanocomposites using biogenically syn- potential antimicrobial applications. Front Lab Med 2:30–35.
thesized nanoparticles and biodegradable polymers, helping in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flm.2018.04.002
8. Zargar V, Asghari M, Dashti A (2015) A review on chitin and
the usage of environmentally friendly, nontoxic PVA-Ag and chitosan polymers: structure, chemistry, solubility, derivatives,
CS-Ag nanocomposite films in many biomedical and indus- and applications. ChemBioEng Rev 2:204–226. https://doi.org/10.
trial applications. 1002/cben.201400025
74 Page 8 of 9 J Polym Res (2020) 27: 74

9. Musto P (2013) Grand challenges in polymer chemistry: energy, 25. Chandran S, Ravichandran V, Chandran S et al (2016) Biosynthesis
environment, health. Front Chem 1:31–34. https://doi.org/10.3389/ of PVA encapsulated silver nanoparticles. J Appl Res Technol 14:
fchem.2013.00031 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jart.2016.07.001
10. Alhosseini N, Mozafari M, Moztarzadeh J et al (2012) Synthesis 26. George J, Sajeevkumar VA, Ramana KV et al (2012) Augmented
and characterization of electrospun polyvinyl alcohol nanofibrous properties of PVA hybrid nanocomposites containing cellulose
scaffolds modified by blending with chitosan for neural tissue en- nanocrystals and silver nanoparticles. J Mater Chem 22:22433–
gineering. Int J Nanomedicine:25. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN. 22439. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm35235d
S25376 27. El Miri N, Abdelouahdi K, Zahouily M et al (2015) Bio-
11. Palza H (2015) Antimicrobial polymers with metal nanoparticles. nanocomposite films based on cellulose nanocrystals filled polyvi-
Int J Mol Sci 16:2099–2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16012099 nyl alcohol/chitosan polymer blend. J Appl Polym Sci 132:1–13.
12. Elgadir MA, Uddin MS, Ferdosh S, Adam A, Chowdhury AJK, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42004
Sarker MZI (2015) Impact of chitosan composites and chitosan 28. Pérez-Díaz M, Alvarado-Gomez E, Magaña-Aquino M, Sánchez-
nanoparticle composites on various drug delivery systems: a re- Sánchez R, Velasquillo C, Gonzalez C, Ganem-Rondero A,
view. J Food Drug Anal 23:619–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Martínez-Castañon G, Zavala-Alonso N, Martinez-Gutierrez F
jfda.2014.10.008 (2016) Anti-biofilm activity of chitosan gels formulated with silver
13. Kalishwaralal K, Jeyabharathi S, Sundar K, Selvamani S, Prasanna nanoparticles and their cytotoxic effect on human fibroblasts. Mater
M, Muthukumaran A (2018) A novel biocompatible chitosan– Sci Eng C 60:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.036
Selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) film with electrical conductivity 29. Ali SW, Rajendran S, Joshi M (2011) Synthesis and characteriza-
for cardiac tissue engineering application. Mater Sci Eng C 92: tion of chitosan and silver loaded chitosan nanoparticles for bioac-
151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.036 tive polyester. Carbohydr Polym 83:438–446. https://doi.org/10.
14. Liu S, Fang F, Wu J, Zhang K (2015) The anti-biofouling properties 1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.004
of thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes grafted with bio- 30. González-Campos JB, Prokhorov E, Sanchez IC et al (2012)
genic silver nanoparticles. Desalination 375:121–128. https://doi. Molecular dynamics analysis of PVA-AgnP composites by dielec-
org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.007 tric spectroscopy. J Nanomater 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/
15. Bilal M, Zhao Y, Rasheed T et al (2019) Biogenic nanoparticle- 925750
chitosan conjugates with antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and anticancer
31. Loo CY, Young PM, Lee WH, Cavaliere R, Whitchurch CB,
potentialities: development and characterization. Int J Environ Res
Rohanizadeh R (2014) Non-cytotoxic silver nanoparticle-
Public Health 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040598
polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels with anti-biofilm activity: designed
16. Tripathi RM, Pudake RN, Shrivastav BR, Shrivastav A (2018)
as coatings for endotracheal tube materials. Biofouling 30:773–
Antibacterial activity of poly (vinyl alcohol) - biogenic silver nano-
788. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2014.926475
composite film for food packaging material. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci
32. Aktürk A, Erol Taygun M, Karbancıoğlu Güler F et al (2019)
Nanotechnol 9. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6254/aac4ec
Fabrication of antibacterial polyvinylalcohol nanocomposite mats
17. Khalil MMH, Ismail EH, El-Baghdady KZ, Mohamed D (2014)
with soluble starch coated silver nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A
Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using olive leaf extract and
Physicochem Eng Asp 562:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
its antibacterial activity. Arab J Chem 7:1131–1139. https://doi.org/
colsurfa.2018.11.034
10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.04.007
33. Thaya R, Malaikozhundan B, Vijayakumar S, Sivakamavalli J,
18. El-Baghdady KZ, El-Shatoury EH, Abdullah OM, Khalil MMH
Jeyasekar R, Shanthi S, Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P, Sonawane A
(2018) Biogenic production of silver nanoparticles by enterobacter
(2016) Chitosan coated Ag/ZnO nanocomposite and their
cloacae ISM26. Turk J Biol 42:319–321. https://doi.org/10.3906/
antibiofilm, antifungal and cytotoxic effects on murine macro-
biy-1801-53
phages. Microb Pathog 100:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
19. Patil RS, Kokate MR, Jambhale CL et al (2012) One-pot synthesis
micpath.2016.09.010
of PVA-capped silver nanoparticles their characterization and bio-
medical application. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 3. https:// 34. Ruparelia JP, Chatterjee AK, Duttagupta SP, Mukherji S (2008)
doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/3/1/015013 Strain specificity in antimicrobial activity of silver and copper nano-
20. Kumar-Krishnan S, Prokhorov E, Hernández-Iturriaga M et al particles. Acta Biomater 4:707–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
(2015) Chitosan/silver nanocomposites: synergistic antibacterial actbio.2007.11.006
action of silver nanoparticles and silver ions. Eur Polym J 67: 35. Hajipour MJ, Fromm KM, Akbar Ashkarran A et al (2012)
242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.066 Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol 30:
21. Tamayo L, Azócar M, Kogan M, Riveros A, Páez M (2016) 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.004
Copper-polymer nanocomposites: an excellent and cost-effective 36. Park SH, Kim SH, Park SJ et al (2016) Direct incorporation of silver
biocide for use on antibacterial surfaces. Mater Sci Eng C 69: nanoparticles onto thin-film composite membranes via arc plasma
1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.041 deposition for enhanced antibacterial and permeation performance.
22. Mishra SK, Basukala P, Basukala O, Parajuli K, Pokhrel BM, Rijal BP J Membr Sci 513:226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.
(2014) Detection of biofilm production and antibiotic resistance pattern 04.013
in clinical isolates from indwelling medical devices. Curr Microbiol 70: 37. Radheshkumar C, Münstedt H (2006) Antimicrobial polymers from
128–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-014-0694-5 polypropylene/silver composites-Ag+ release measured by anode
23. Naskar A, Khan H, Sarkar R, Kumar S, Halder D, Jana S (2018) stripping voltammetry. React Funct Polym 66:780–788. https://
Anti-biofilm activity and food packaging application of room tem- doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2005.11.005
perature solution process based polyethylene glycol capped Ag- 38. Govindan S, Nivethaa EAK, Saravanan R et al (2012) Synthesis
ZnO-graphene nanocomposite. Mater Sci Eng C 91:743–753. and characterization of chitosan–silver nanocomposite. Appl
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.009 Nanosci 2:299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-012-0109-5
24. Hajji S, Slama-Ben Salem RBS, Hamdi M et al (2017) 39. Levi-Polyachenko N, Jacob R, Day C, Kuthirummal N (2016)
Nanocomposite films based on chitosan–poly (vinyl alcohol) and Chitosan wound dressing with hexagonal silver nanoparticles for
silver nanoparticles with high antibacterial and antioxidant activi- hyperthermia and enhanced delivery of small molecules. Colloids
ties. Process Saf Environ Prot 111:112–121. https://doi.org/10. Surf B: Biointerfaces 142:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
1016/j.psep.2017.06.018 colsurfb.2016.02.038
J Polym Res (2020) 27: 74 Page 9 of 9 74

40. Mathew S, Mathew J, Radhakrishnan EK (2019) Polyvinyl alcohol/ 47. Abdelgawad AM, Hudson SM, Rojas OJ (2014) Antimicrobial
silver nanocomposite films fabricated under the influence of solar wound dressing nanofiber mats from multicomponent (chitosan/
radiation as effective antimicrobial food packaging material. J silver-NPs/polyvinyl alcohol) systems. Carbohydr Polym 100:
Polym Res 26:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-019-1888-0 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.12.043
41. Devi JM, Umadevi M (2014) Synthesis and characterization of 48. Bar-Ilan O, Albrecht RM, Fako VE, Furgeson DY (2009) Toxicity
silver-PVA Nanocomposite for sensor and antibacterial applica- assessments of multisized gold and silver nanoparticles in zebrafish
tions. J Clust Sci 25:639–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876- embryos. Small 5:1897–1910. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.
013-0660-6 200801716
42. Calamak S, Aksoy EA, Ertas N et al (2015) Ag/silk fibroin nanofi- 49. Hofmann MC, Braydich-Stolle L, Hussain S, Schlager JJ (2005)
bers: effect of fibroin morphology on Ag+ release and antibacterial In vitro cytotoxicity of nanoparticles in mammalian germline stem
activity. Eur Polym J 67:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cells. Toxicol Sci 88:412–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/
eurpolymj.2015.03.068 kfi256
43. Kalishwaralal K, Deepak V, Ram Kumar Pandian S, Kottaisamy M, 50. Kim HR, Kim MJ, Lee SY et al (2011) Genotoxic effects of silver
BarathmaniKanth S, Kartikeyan B, Gurunathan S (2010) nanoparticles stimulated by oxidative stress in human normal bron-
Biosynthesis of silver and gold n an oparticles using chial epithelial (BEAS-2B) cells. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ
Brevibacterium casei. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 77:257–262. Mutagen 726:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.02.007 08.008
44. Velázquez-Velázquez JL, Santos-Flores A, Araujo-Meléndez J, 51. Samberg ME, Loboa EG, Oldenburg SJ, Monteiro-Riviere NA
Sánchez-Sánchez R, Velasquillo C, González C, Martínez- (2012) Silver nanoparticles do not influence stem cell differentia-
Castañon G, Martinez-Gutierrez F (2015) Anti-biofilm and cyto- tion but cause minimal toxicity. Nanomedicine 7:1197–1209.
toxicity activity of impregnated dressings with silver nanoparticles. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.12.18
Mater Sci Eng C 49:604–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.
52. Nymark P, Catalán J, Suhonen S, Järventaus H, Birkedal R, Clausen
12.084
PA, Jensen KA, Vippola M, Savolainen K, Norppa H (2013)
45. Mohanty S, Mishra S, Jena P et al (2012) An investigation on the
Genotoxicity of polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated silver nanoparticles
antibacterial, cytotoxic, and antibiofilm efficacy of starch-stabilized
in BEAS 2B cells. Toxicology 313:38–48. https://doi.org/10.
silver nanoparticles. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 8:916–924.
1016/j.tox.2012.09.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2011.11.007
46. Ambrogi V, Pietrella D, Nocchetti M, Casagrande S, Moretti V, de
Marco S, Ricci M (2017) Montmorillonite–chitosan–chlorhexidine Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdic-
composite films with antibiofilm activity and improved cytotoxicity tional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
for wound dressing. J Colloid Interface Sci 491:265–272. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.12.058

You might also like