Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
(http://iopscience.iop.org/0370-1301/69/8/305)
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
Download details:
IP Address: 193.140.168.108
This content was downloaded on 24/02/2014 at 16:39
BY E. H. KERNER
Department of Physics, University of Buffalo, New York
3 1. INTRODUCTIOK
I\’ an accompanying paper (Kerner 1956) is described a method for deducing
$ 2 . SUSPENDEDGRAINS
We label quantities referring to any grain species i with the subscript i,
reserving the subscript 0 for the composite as a whole; the index 1 refers to
the suspending fluid.
Let a large mass of the composite be subjected to a simple hydrostatic com-
Pression. T h e mass behaves elastically in the large like some uniform material
having a shear modulus po and bulk modulus k, which we wish to find. Though
the state of stress and strain at any point within the composite be exceedingly
to find, we assume that as we go from grain to grain of any species i
there is some average state of stress and strain in and near the average i-grain
that has a simple character : one calculable by examining the average spherical
‘Train, characterized by p,, k,,bounded b y a layer p,, k,, then the intermediate
sone, and finally the average medium po,k,. We construct, in short, an ‘ average
‘ l a s h problem ’ similar to the average problem descrihed in the conductivity
Paper.
810 E. H . Kerner
I n any case we must have that the total change in volume in the composite
must be the sum of the volume changes in its different parts. Denoting the
dilatation by I this means
Jl,dr,= z S l j d r i ......(1)
or
......(2)
where vi= T J T , = fraction of total volume occupied by material of species i, and
cvi= 1.
Let us denote by 0 the bulk stress, giving the mean pressure at a point. For
any plane surface drawn in the composite we must have that the mean normal
force across it is the sum of the mean normal forces across its parts which lie
in the different grains and the suspending fluid. That is, analogously to
equation (1) we must have
J0,dS0= Z J O i d S i ...... (3)
or, like equation (2),
-
3, = eiv, (vi = SJS, = T+/T,). ......(4)
Now, in the average elastic problem, for a simple compression the radial
displacements are of the form
U,= Air (in i) ; U, = A,r + B,r-2 (in 1) ; U, = A,r + (in 0).
T h e dilatation is 3Ai = in each medium, and the bulk stress is 3kiAi = in each.
When these are introduced into equations (2) and (4)we may eliminate A, between
them and express k , in terms of A,, or better, AJA,. T h e latter ratio is fixed
by the continuity conditions on displacements and tractions at the interface of
the average i-grain sphere and the layer of suspending fluid 1, and has the value
(3k1 + 4p1)/(3ki + 4p1). T h e calculation of k, then gives
.....(5)
T o find the gross shear modulus po we analyse the average effect of a uniform
tension applied to the composite. T h e average elastic problem then consists of
a spherical inclusion pd,ki, with its l-layer and intermediate zone, embedded
in p,, k, in which there is a uniform tension, say in the z direction, at infinity.
A problem of this sort, one having the inclusion embedded directly in a second
medium, has been discussed by Goodier (1933).
T h e use of a dilatation equation, like equation (l), or a bulk stress equation,
like equation (3), will provide no new information here. For, by the super.
position principle any uniform state of stress may be derived from a system of
uniform tensions applied in suitable directions ; in particular a uniform (negative)
hydrostatic compression can be obtained by superposing uniform tensions in
three mutually orthogonal directions, and a calculation of dilatations for
equation (1) from any one of these tknsions is the same as a calculation for all
three simultaneously, as may be verified directly. We could have, indeed,
dispensed with a separate derivation of equation (5) via the uniform hydrostatIC
compression, and relied only on a dilatation calculation from the uniform tensio",
T h e superposition principle tells us, in short, that the result in equation (5) Is
The Elastic and Thermo-elastic Properties of Composite Media 81 1
independentof what uniform stress we apply to the composite; invoking the
hydrostaticcompression was a matter of convenience, not necessity.
Consider a long line segment Loparallel to the z axis in the composite under
tension. The elongation I,, measures the change in length per unit length in
the direction, and bears a relationship to the state of tension similar to that
,,hi& the dilatation bears to the state of hydrostatic compression. Analogously
to (1) we may write
1
1220 dzo = f
l,,, dz,,
and by the mean value theorem again,
-
1220 = c Lzvz 9 ...... ( 6 )
(iL is LJL0 as well as S,/So and r2/~,-,, L,/& denoting the fraction of Lo lying
,,ithin material i ) .
If T,, denotes the normal stress across an x, y plane in the composite, we may,
In a parallel with equation ( 3 ) , equate the normal force across this plane to the sum
the forces across its parts lying in the different components:
J Tz,odSo= f T,,,dS,
and thence -
Txxo = T,,,v,* ...... (7)
If me extend Goodier’s analysis now to the average elastic problem, the
displacements are, in spherical coordinates ( U denoting Poisson’s ratio and To
the uniform tension)
In i U ,= F,Y+ D,Y+ 2u,E,r3+ (3D,r + 6qE,r3)cos28,
ue= -(3D,r+(7-4u,)E,,r3)sin28.
5 - 4a1 c,
----
1-20, r2
’zl) +
COS 28 + F1r D,r + ~ u , E ~ Y ~
U,,= - r2 + 9)
+ (3D1Y+ 60,E,r3)cos 28,
sin 28 - ( 3 D g + (7 - 40,)E,r3)sin 28.
The direct calculation of l,, and of T,, = A1 + 2pZz,(A being the Lam6 coefficient
(/ ,z 1 - 20)) gives, when substituted into equations (6) and (7),
F, + 4 0 , + 3
28 E,a?)v,,
(3h,+ + 8p,
\\here a, is the radius of the average i-grain. However, 3F is the dilatation and
3F(3h+2p) is the bulk stress, and so, according to our discussion above of the
suPerposition principle, we have already, in equations (1) and ( 3 ) , effectively
+ +
placed F, = CF,v, and (3h0 2p0)F0= X ( 3 h , 2pz)F,. Hence
812 E. H . Kerner
whence
PiVi Vl
p,,=p,
E' ( 7 - 5 ~ ~ ) p ~ + ( 8 - 1 0 ~ ~ )15(1-al)
~ _ _ _ - - -
+
-----
p;
......(8)
x' +
V19
(7 - 5u,)p1 (8 - 10o,)p1
15(1- U,)
The C.' stands for a summation excluding the index 1.
+
Vl
$ 3 . PACKED GRAINS
We examine now the limiting case of the final formulae (5) and (8) for
and po in the limit that the suspending fluid vanishes and the grains becon
packed. Placing e, = 0 in these formulae gives again the same ' paradox ' notr
in the conductivity problem, that the gross moduli depend still on the propert)
of the vanished fluid 1. However, exactly the same answer to the difficuk
prevails in the present case. This is that, upon isolating the terms in
equations (5) and (S), these equations are identically satisfied for all t i , (includr
vl = 0), provided that K,, p, are chosen to be k,, po and that the latter simultaneou:
satisfy
k,- k,
O= 2' WO vi9
....
(Po - P i h
O= E' (7 - 5uo)po+ (8 - 1Ou0)pcLi - ...
In effect, in going to v,=O the fluid 1 is to be replaced by fluid 0.
T h e packed-grain moduli are given now by the coupled equations (9) and (11
T h e discontinuity in these moduli with those given by equations ( 5 ) and (8):
any arbitrarily small v, corresponds to a real physical discontinuity which mi
in fact be accounted for by a theory of composite media. Consider, for examp'
a composite of liquid drops suspended in some very rigid material. So lor
as there is a finite amount of the latter the gross shear modulus remains hip
but as soon as it disappears the modulus drops to aero ; this is correctly describ
by the above equations.
It is of interest to note that had we considered the packed grains bound-
directly by the average medium KO, p, we would find equation (9) coml
independently from (2) and from (4)and equation (10) independently from 1
and from (7).
$ 4 . THERMO-ELASTIC PROPERTIES
I n the suspended-grain composite let a small temperature drop T placet
system in a stressed state as compared with its original state, taken to be unstresst
T h e composite over-all behaves like some uniform medium having an expans''
coefficient yo and suffering a dilatation y o T . Constructing as bcforc the averd.
The Electric and Thermo-elastic Properties of Composite Media 813
,vhile the dilatation and bulk stress equations (1) and ( 3 ) are
Y O T = Z ( Y ~ T + ~ A ~ ) UO=Xk,Ap,.
~;
From the latter equation we get, using A i above,
'rhis introduced into the former equation yields a term involving the combination
of elastic moduli defining k, according to equation (5). T h e result is, after a
reduction,
It is seen that only in the case that all components have the same bulk modulus
does the simple ' rule of mixtures ' yo = X y p , , hold.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I am indebted to Dr. S. Mrozowski for bringing these problems t o my notice
and for valuable critical remarks. T h e work was partially supported by t h e
C.S.Atomic Energy Commission.
REFERENCES
BRUCGEMAN, D. A. G., 1935, Ann. Phys. Lpz., 24, 635; 1937, Ibid., 29,160.
H., and SACK,R., 1946, Proc. Roy. SOC.
FR~HLICH, A, 185, 415.
J. N., 1933, Trans. Amer. Soc. Mech. Engrs, 55, 39.
GOODIER,
E. H., 1956, Proc. Phys. Soc. B, 69, 802.
KERNER,
MACKENZIE,J . K., 1950, PYOC.
Phys. Soc. B, 63, 2.