Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S. JOSHI,JOHNK. WUNDERLICH,
BALAWANT and S. WILLIAM
PELLETIER.
Can. J. Chem. 65,99 (1987).
I3C Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is an exceptionally useful tool for the structure determination of diterpenoid
alkaloids. A detailed study of the 'H and 13Cnmr spectra of aconitine and 3-deoxyaconitinehas permitted definite assignments
to all the carbon atoms of the molecule. Chemical shift revisions have been suggested for certain carbon atoms of the
C19-diterpenoidalkaloids. Chemical examination of Aconitum columbianum Nutt. ssp. columbianum, A. forrestii Stapf,
Delphinium tatsienense Franch., and D. vestitum Wall. resulted in the isolation of several new C19-diterpenoidalkaloids.
Can. J. Chem. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 64.107.14.30 on 11/10/14
The structure derivation of those alkaloids was based mainly on 13Cnmr spectroscopic evidence.
83.4 pprn was assigned to C(6) as it was correlated with H-6, TABLE3. DIFNOE experiment on aconitine lAa
appearing at 6 4.04. Using the same approach, assignments
were made for C(l), C(3), C(14), C(15), C(17), and C(18) Assignment
(Table 2). The signals at 48.9 and 47.0 pprn showed correlation Nuclear Overhauser
with the methylene proton resonances of an N-ethyl group and OMe 'H signal enhancement ( 6 ) 'H I3c
C(19), respectively. The methine carbons appearing at 46.9,
44.8, and 44.2 pprn were correlated with H-5, H-7, and H-9 H-15 61.1
OH-15 -
resonating at 2.1, 2.84, and 2.9, respectively. The doublet at OH- 13 -
40.9 pprn was assigned to C(10) as it showed an overlap with the H-16 -
H-10 resonance at 6 2.33. The remaining chemical shifts for - 59.1
C(2) and C(12) were assigned to the signals appearing at 33.9 H- 1 55.9
and 35.9 ppm, respectively. H-6 58.0
The DIFNOE (difference nuclear Overhauser enhancement) C(8)-OAC
technique was used for assigning the methoxyl protons.
Irradiation at 6 3.76 gave four enhanced signals, due to H-15, "See NOTE, Table 1 .
15-OH, 13-OH, and H-16, suggesting that the 6 3.76 signal
belongs to the 16'-methoxyl group. The C/H correlation shows have been assigned incorrectly. One such error has been noticed
that the signal at 61.1 pprn can be assigned to the 16'-methoxyl. in the chemical shift assignments for C(10) and C(13). For most
The remaining three methoxyls were similarly assigned (Table 3). of the alkaloids, the higher field resonance appearing in the
These investigations provided accurate 13cchemical shift range 37-43 pprn has been ascribed to C(10) and the lower
assignments for all the carbon atoms of aconitine. Table 4 field signal around 43-46 pprn to C(13), when neither of these
shows a comparison of the previously assigned values (4) and carbons bears an oxygen function. It is well established that
the revised chemical shift assignments. By a similar set of within a group of closely related compounds, a given substituent
experiments, the 'H and 13C chemical shifts of 3-deoxyaconi- produces remarkably similar effects on the shielding of the
tine ( 1 B ) were derived (Table 4). carbons at or near the site of substitution. Thus, when a
On the basis of published data of the 13C nmr spectra of more hydrogen is replaced by a hydroxyl group, a downfield shift of
than 160 Clg-diterpenoid alkaloids and their derivatives, we about 7-8 pprn is observed on the p carbon (p-effect) and an
have prepared a table indicating the general chemical shift upfield shift of 2-4 pprn on the y carbon (y-effect).
ranges of all the carbon atoms (1). These data are only These generalized P- and y-effects are not observed in the
approximations but are useful in studying the structures of published chemical shifts of C(10) and C(13) in closely related
newly isolated alkaloids. C19-diterpenoid alkaloids; e.g. placement of a hydroxyl at C(9)
Even when correct structures may be derived on the basis of in monticoline (2) leads to a related alkaloid ranaconine (3). The
these chemical shift values, the individual carbon atoms could chemical shifts for C(10) and C(13) in monticoline (2) have
JOSH1 ET AL.
5 Lappaconine 6 Gadesine
Can. J. Chem. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 64.107.14.30 on 11/10/14
7 Nevadenine
6:;-rMe
crystal structure determination (17). The isolation and structure
2 Monticoline
3 Ranaconine determination of another amorphous alkaloid, C25H41N07(lo),
designated as deltatsine, was based on 'H nrnr and 13cnmr
spectroscopic data and a chemical correlation with delcosine
(11) (18). The other C19-diterpenoidalkaloids from D. tatsien-
Et- --,r4 ,, ___--- ense, whose structures were determined by 13C nmr spectra,
Y
'. H were browniine, delcosine, lycoctonine, and the C20-diterpenoid
alkaloids ajaconine, hetisine, and hetisinone (15). A C2,-diter-
4 Sachaconitine penoid alkaloid, C21H33N03,mp 181-182"C, isolated from
CAN. J. CHEM.
OMe
11 R = H D e l c o s i n e 22 R = A c Foresaconitine 21 R = A c Yunaconitine
(" these values may be interchanged). The structures of all the alkaloids were derived mainly on the
I basis of 13C nmr spectral data.
From the roots of another Chinese medicinal plant, Aconitum
forrestii Stapf, we had isolated two new C19-diterpenoid Delphinium vestitum Wall., growing in the Western Hima-
I
I alkaloids forestine (14) and foresticine (15) together with three layas, was found to contain two closely related alkaloids
1
known alkaloids chasmanine, talatizamine, and yunaconitine delvestine (25) and delvestidine (26), the structures of which
I
(21). These alkaloids were isolated from the crude alkaloid
I fraction obtained at pH 8 and the structures were derived mainly
on 13Cnmr spectroscopic evidence. From the alkaloidal fraction
1 taken at pH 5-6, we have isolated four new alkaloids acoforine
1 (16), acoforesticine (17), acoforestine (18), and acoforestinine
1 /
(19), besides crassicauline A (20) and yunaconitine (21). OMe
16 d = ~ c R'=E~
; Acoforine
23 ~ = R ' = H Talatizarnine
24 d = H ; R'=E~ C o l u m b i d i n e 25 R = H Delvestine
Et-
26 R = M e Delvestidine
were based on 13C nmr spectroscopic data and correlation with
gigactonine and lycoctonine, respectively (24).
In summary, our work indicates that a data bank of 13cnrnr
14 R = H F o r e s t i n e 15 F o r e s t i c i n e spectra of C19-diterpenoid alkaloids is valuable in deriving
structures of newly isolated compounds of this class. Also,
20 R = A c C r a s s i c a u l i n e A in the case of amorphous alkaloids, where an X-ray crystal
structure determination is not possible, I3C nmr spectroscopy is
, Except for acoforestine, mp 203-204"C, the three alkaloids 16, a very useful tool for derivation of structure.
1 17, and 19 are amorphous. The structures of all these alkaloids
I were derived from their 13C nmr spectral data and correlation 1. S. W. PELLETIER, N. V. MODY,B. S . JOSHI,and L. C.
studies. Acoforine (16) was shown to be identical with SCHRAMM. In Alkaloids: chemical and biological perspectives.
14-acetylcolumbidine, prepared from columbidine (vide infra). Vol. 2 . Edited by S.W. Pelletier. John Wiley, New York. 1984.
When acoforesticine (17) was acetylated with acetic anhydride Chapt. 5 . p. 205.
1
and p-toluenesulfonic acid it gave the known alkaloid foresaco- 2. S. W. PELLETIER, B. S. JOSHI, and H. K. DESAI. In Advances in
l
nitine (vilmorrianine C) (22). Heating crassicauline A (20) with medicinal plant research. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellsehaft
mbH, Stuttgart. 1985. pp. 153-195; H. K. DESAI, B. S. JOSHI,
ethanol in a sealed tube at 130°C afforded acoforestine (18). As A. M. PANU,and S. W. PELLETIER. J. Chromatogr. 322, 223
the structure of 20 was based only on spectral and chemical (1985).
evidence, an X-ray crystal structure determination of acofores- 3. A. J. JONES and M. H. BENN.Can. J. Chem. 51, 486 (1973).
tine was carried out, confirming the structure proposals 18 and 4 . S. W. P E L L E T I E RDJARMATI.
~ ~ ~ Z . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98,2626
20 for these alkaloids (22). (1976).
JOSH1 ET AL. 103
5. J. WUNDERLICH. Ph.D. thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, 16. J. A. GLINSKI,B. S. JOSHI,S. Y. CHEN,and S. W . PELLETIER.
Georgia. 1985. Tetrahedron Lett. 25, 121 1 (1984).
6. A. KATZand H. RUDIN.Helv. Chim. Acta, 67, 2017 (1984). 17. J. A. MADDRY.Ph.D. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens,
7. E. F. AMETOVA, M. S. YUNUSOV, V. E. BANNIKOVA, N. D. Georgia. 1985.
ABDULLAEV, and V. A. TEL'NOV.Khim. Prir. Soedin. 466 18. B. S. JOSHI,J. A. GLINSKI,H. P. CHOKSHI, S. Y. CHEN,S. K.
(1981). SRIVASTAVA, and S. W. PELLETIER. Heterocycles, 22, 2037
8. S. W. PELLETIER, N. V. MODY,A. P. VENKOV,and N. M. (1984).
MOLLOV. Tetrahedron Lett. 5045 (1978). 19. B. J. SALIMOV, M. S. YUNUSOV, Y. V. RASHKES, and S. Y.
9. S. W. PELLETIER, N. V. MODY,and N. KATSUI.Tetrahedron Y u ~ u s o vKhirn.
. Prir. Soedin. 812 (1979).
Lett. 4027 (1977); C. R. YANG,D. Z. WANG,D. G. WU, X. J. 20. B. TASHKHADZHAEV. Khim. Prir. Soedin. 812 (1979); B. J.
HAO,and H. ZHOU.Acta Chim. Sin. 39, 445 (198 1). SALIMOV, B. TASHKHODZHAEV, and M. S. Y u ~ u s o v .Khim.
10. S. W. PELLETIER, N. V. MODY,and R. S. SAWHNEY. Can. J. Prir. Soedin. 86 (1981).
Chern. 57, 1652 (1979). 21. S. W. PELLETIER, S. Y. CHEN,B. S. JOSHI,and H. K. DESAI.
11. S. W. PELLETIER, S. K. SRIVASTAVA, B. S. JOSHI,and J. D. J. Nat. Prod. 47, 474 (1984).
OLSEN.Heterocycles, 23, 331 (1985). 22. S. W. PELLETIER, B. S. JOSHI,J. A. GLINSKI, H. P. CHOKSHI,
12. A. G. GONSALEZ, G. DE LA FUENTE,R. DIAZ,J. FAYOS,and S.-Y. CHEN,K. BHANDARY, and K. GO. Heterocycles. In press.
Can. J. Chem. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 64.107.14.30 on 11/10/14
M. MARTINEZ-RIPOLL. Tetrahedron Lett. 79 (1979). 23. C. A. GROB, H. R. KIEFER,H. LUTZ, and H . WILKENS.
13. A. G. GONSALEZ, G. DE LA FUENTE,T. ORRIBO,and R. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 290 1 ( 1964).
ACOSTA.Heterocycles, 23, 2979 (1985). 24. H. K. DESAI,B. S. JOSHI,and S. W. PELLETIER. Heterocycles,
14. E. BREITMAIER and W. VOELTER.' 3 ~ spectroscopy.- ~ ~ ~ 23, 2483 (1985).
Verlag Chernie, Weinheim, New York. 1978. p. 153.
15. S. W. PELLETIER, J. A. GLINSKI,B. S. JOSHI,and S. Y. CHEN.
Heterocycles, 20, 1347 (1983).
For personal use only.