Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Arellano University School of Law Remedial Law Department Syllabus: School Year 2020-2021 Remedial Law Review I Civil Procedure
Arellano University School of Law Remedial Law Department Syllabus: School Year 2020-2021 Remedial Law Review I Civil Procedure
I. JURISDICTION
A. Classes of Jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction according to its nature: original, appellate
- Jurisdiction according to its object; corresponding principles
i. over the subject matter
ii. over the persons of the parties
iii. over the "res"
iv. over the issues
v. over the territory
1
D. Discuss the concept, description and application of the following:
1. Delegated jurisdiction
2. Special jurisdiction
3. Limited jurisdiction
4. Primary jurisdiction
Unduran vs. Aberasturi, 823 SCRA (20/7)
LDP vs. Dalauta, 835 SCRA (2017)
5. Residual jurisdiction
Dev. Bank Phil. vs. Carpio, 816 SCRA (2017)
o Requisites: trial, judgment, appeal
6. Equity jurisdiction
Regulus Dev. Inc. vs. De la Cruz, 781 SCREA (2016)
7. Epistolary jurisdiction
Resident Marine Mammals vs. Reyes, 756 SCRA (2015)
8. Split jurisdiction
City of Manila vs. Judge Cuerdo (2014)
9. Expanded/Extended jurisdiction
Edcel Lagman vs. Pimentel Ill, 854 SCRA (2018)
References:
1. Section 5, Article V Ill, 1986 Constitution
2. Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980
3. B.P. Big. 129
4. RA 7691
5. RA 8369 (Family Courts Act)
6. SC-AO No. 113-95- Intellectual Property Courts
7. PD 1486; 1606 (Sandiganbayan)
8. RA 7975; 8249; 10660 (Sandiganbayan)
9. RA 9282 (Court of Tax Appeals)
10.RA 9054 (Sharia'h Courts)
Other Cases On:
Jurisdictional estoppel
1. Duero vs CA -373 SCRA 11
2. Gonzaga vs CA - 394 SCRA 472
3. Manila Bankers vs. Ng Kok Wei, 418 SCRA
4. Boston Equity Resources, Inc. vs. CA, 699 SCRA
Hierarchy of Courts
5. Agan vs. Piato, 420 SCRA
6. Liga Ng Mga Barangay vs. Atienza, 420 SCRA
7. st. Mary Crusade Fndtn vs. Riel, 745 SCRA
8. Intramuros Administration vs. Offshore Construction
And Development co., 857 SCRA (2017)
9. Bureau of Customs vs. Gallegos
Residual Prerogatives
10. Katon vs. Palanca, 437 SCRA
Concurrent Jurisdiction: Pat-og vs. CSC, 697 SCRA (2013)
Actions incapable of pecuniary estimation: First Sarmiento Property
Holdings, Inc. vs. Phil Bank of Communications, June 19, 2018
Justice Leonen, en banc (note: for class discussion)
2
II. RULES 1 to 5
3
- What are their salient characteristics
- How to determine if the case is summary or under small claims
- OCA 45-2019: increased amount of small claims to P400,000
Case:
A.L. Ang Network Inc. vs. Mondejar, 714 SCRA (1/28/14)
Cases:
1. Alba vs. Malapajo - 780 SCRA 534
2. Lim Teck Chuan vs. Uy -752 SCRA 268
3. Metrobank vs. CPR Promotions -760 SCRA 59
4. Valdez vs. Dabon - 775 SCRA 1
5. Republic vs. Sandiganbayan — 406 SCRA 190
6. Caneland Sugar Corp. vs. Alon — 533 SCRA 28
Cases:
1. Alma Jose vs. Javellana — 664 SCRA 1
2. Medado vs. Heirs of Antonio Consing — 665 SCRA 534
3. COA vs. Paler - 614 SCRA
4. Basan vs. Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils. - 749 SCRA 541
5. IJy vs. CA- 770 SCRA 513
6. People vs. Arojado - 774 SCRA 193
7. Powerhouse vs. Rey, 807 SCRA (2016)
8. Heirs of Josefina Gabriel vs. Segundina Cebrero, Nov. 12, 201
Cases:
4
2. Go Tong Electrical supply vs. BPI Family Savings Bank
3. Asian const. & Dev. corp. vs. CA - 458 SCRA
4. 13enguet Exploration Inc. vs. CA -351 SCRA
Cases:
1. BDO vs. Tansipek - 593 SCRA 456
2. Salvador vs. Rabaja - 749 SCRA 654
3. Bitte vs. Jonas - 777 SCRA 489
Cases:
1. Yujuico vs. United Resources Asset Mgt. Corp. — 760 SCRA
2. Lisam Enterprises vs. Banco De Oro — 670 SCRA
3. Tiu vs. Phil. Bank of Communications — 596 SCRA 432
4. Remington Industrial Sales Corp. vs. CA -382 SCRA 499
5
IX. RULE 12: Bill (Sections 1-6)
- When applied/purpose
- Compliance vs. non-compliance
X. RULE 13: Filing and Service ofPleadings, Judgments and Other Papers (Sections 1-19)
Cases:
1. Palileo vs. Planters Dev. Bank - 738 SCRA
2. Heirs of Numeriano Miranda vs. Miranda — 700 SCRA
Cases:
1. Valmonte vs CA- 252 SCRA
2. Millenium Ind. & Com. Corp., vs Tan- 326 SCRA
3. E.B. Villarosa vs. Benito — 312 SCRA
6
4. Santos vs. PNOC Exploration, 566 SCRA 272
5. Mason vs. CA, 413 SCRA
6. Jose vs. Boyon, 414 SCRA
7. Manotoc vs. CA -499 SCRA 21
8. Ong vs. Co, February 25, 2015
9. Domagas vs. Jensen — 448 SCRA 663
10. Dole Phil. vs. Quilala- 557 SCRA 433
11. Green Star Express v. Nissin Universal Robina Corp — 761 SCRA
12. Guy vs. Gacott- 780 SCRA 579 (1/13/16)
13. G. V. Florida Transit Inc. vs. Tiara Commercial Corporation 842 SCRA, October 18, 2017
On voluntary appearance:
1. Sunrise Garden Corp. vs. CA — 771 SCRA 616
2. Tujan-Militante vs. Nustad, 872 SCRA (2017)
A. Definition
B. Requirements
C. Kinds: litigious; non-litigious
D. Omnibus Motion
E. Prohibited Motions
F. Dismissal with prejudice
Cases:
1. Republic vs. Dimarucut, 857 SCRA (2017)
2. Acampado vss. Cosmilla, 771 SCRA
3. Laude vs. Gines-Jabalde, 775 SCRA
4.De Guzman vs. Ochoa, 684 SCRA
A. When conducted
B. Nature and Purpose
C Notice
7
D. Effect of failure to appear
E. Pre-trial order
F. Mediations
G. Judicial Dispute Resolutions
Note: A. M. No. 03-1-09 Supreme court effective August 16, 2004 (Guidelines to
be observed by trial courts judges and clerks in the conduct of pre-trial and
use of deposition-discovery measures)
8
C. Rule 25: Interrogatories to Parties (Sections I -6)
Cases:
1. Afulugencia vs. Metro bank,715 SCRA
2. Phil. Health vs. our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, 744 SCRA
- Effect of failure to serve written interrogatories
A. Demurrer to Evidence
- Distinguish between civil and criminal actions
- The similarities and differences between them
Cases:
9
XXII. RULE 34 & 35: Judgment on the Pleadings (Sections 1-2)
Summary Judgment (Sections 1-6)
Cases:
1. Republic vs. Shell Petroleum Corp. — 777 SCRA393
2. Comglas Corp. vs. Santos Car Check Center — 754 SCRA 481
3. Phil Bank of Communications vs. Go. - 642 SCRA
4. Adolfo vs. Adolfo -753 SCRA 580
XXIII. RULE 36: Judgments, Final Orders and Entry Thereof (Sections 1-6)
- When is judgment deemed entered? Effect?
1. Several judgments (S-4)
2. Separate judgments (S-5)
3. Judgments against entities without personality (S-6)
Case: FASAP vs PAL, 858 SCRA (for class discussion)
Cases:
1. Mendezona vs. Ozamis — 376 SCRA
2. People vs. Li Ka Kim -429 SCRA 169
3. Padilla Rumbaua vs. Rumbaua — 596 SCRA 15
4. Chua vs. People -762 SCRA 523
5. Senit vs. Peotple - 778 SCRA 425 (1/11/16)
10
D. Appeals from QJA to CA (R-43)
Contents of Petition (S-6)
Action on Petition (S-8)
Effect of Appeal (S-12)
Galindez vs. Firmalan, 864 SCRA 282 (June 2018)
E. Ordinary Appealed Cases to the CA (R-44)
Appellants Brief (S-7)
Appellees Brief (S-8)
De los Santos vs. Lucenio, 859 SCRA 449 (March 2018)
F. Appeal by Certiorari (R-45)
Contents of Petition (S-4)
Requirements (S-7)
Mendoza vs. Palugod, 867 SCRA 299 (2018)
Kensonic, Inc. vs. UNI-Line Multi Resources, 864 SCRA 560
G. Dismissal of Appeal (R-50)
Valderama vs. Arguelles, 860 SCRA 188 (2018)
Material Data Rule (S-1)
Fresh period Rule: Fortune Life Insurance vs. COA, 845 SCRA (Nov. 21, 2017)
11
XXVII. RULE 39 - EXECUTION AND SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENTS
A. Kinds of Execution
1. Matter of right, ministerial (S-l)
2. Discretionary (S-2)
a. stay of discretionary execution (S-3)
b. judgments not stayed by appeal (S-4)
Cases on execution pending appeal:
Banes vs. Banes, 374 SCRA 340
Santos vs. COMELEC, 399 SCRA 611
FEBTC vs. Toh, 404 SCRA
Stronghold Insurance vs. Felix, 508 SCRA
Abenion vs. Shell Petroleum, 816 SCRA (2017)
Ocampo vs. Enriquez, 835 SCRA484 (2017)
B. Mode of Execution
1. By motion (S-6)
Villareal vs. MWSS, 857 SCRA 162
RCBCvs. sera, 701 SCRA 124
2. By independent action (S-6)
Davis vs. Davis, 858 SCRA 145
Panotes vs. Townhouse Dev. Corp., 512 SCRA
C. Manner of Execution
1. when party is dead (S-7)
2. when judgment is for money (S-6)
3. when judgment is for specific act (S-10)
4. when it is a special judgment (S-l l)
D. Properties exempt from execution (S-13)
D 'Armoured Security Agency vs. Orpia, 461 SCRA 312
E. Third Party Claim (S-16)
PSALM vs. Maun1adHomes, Inc., 817 SCRA (2/8/17)
F. Execution Sale (S-17 to 26)
G. Redemption:
1. The right of redemption vs equity of redemption
2. Who may redeem (S-27)
3. Effects of redemption (S-29)
H. Other remedies to fully satisfy judgment
1. Examination of judgment obligor (S-36)
2. Examination of obligor of judgment-obligor (S-37)
3. Appointment of receiver (S-41)
4. Sale of ascertainable interest (S-42)
I. Judgment: principal vs surety' (S-46)
J. Effect of Judgment (S-47)
1. in rem
2. in personam
3. res judicata
City of Cebu vs. Dedamo, 689 SCRA
K. Effect of foreign judgment (S-48)
Fujiki vs. Marinay, 700 SCRA 690
BPI vs. Guevarra, 752 SCR4 342
12
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
ON JURISDICTION
A. Supreme Court:
1. No original Jurisdiction over criminal cases
2. 2. Appellate jurisdiction: a) by petition for review b) by notice of appeal
B. Court of Appeals
1. No original jurisdiction
2. Appellate jurisdiction: a) by notice of appeal b) by petition for review
2. Appellate Jurisdiction
All cases decided by the R TC in the exercise of original or appellate jurisdiction over cases of
public officers with salary grade less than 27 charged with offenses/crimes aforementioned
13
Note: The offenses are cognizable only by the RTC regardless of the penalty impossible:
i. Violations of the Omnibus Election Code
ii. Violations of the Intellectual Property Law
iii. Violations of the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
iv. Violations or the Anti- Money Laundering Law
v. Violations of the Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002
vi. Cases of Written Defamations
14
Read: People vs. Valdez, 663 SCRA 272
Miguel vs. Sandiganbayan, 675 SCRA 560
People vs. Soria, 685 SCRA 483
A. Definition/Description
- when a matter of right
- distinguish from Preliminary Examination
Read: Fenequito vs. Vergara, Jr., 677 SCRA 113
15
Burgundy Realty Corporation vs. Reyes, 687 SCRA 524
B. Who may conduct P. I.
Read: Abanado vs. Bayona, 677 SCRA 595
Heirs of Nestor Tria vs. Obias, 635 SCRA 91
C. Procedure in Metro Manila vs. Outside Metro Manila
Read: Uy vs. Javellana, 680 SCRA 13
D. Inquest, what is
- when applied
- waiver of Art. 125 of RPC
Read: People vs. Valencia, 214 SCRA 89
E. Quantum of Evidence
- probable cause vs. prima facie
PCGG vs. Navarro-Gutierrez, 773 SCRA
De Lima vs. Reyes, 779 SCRA
B. Conditions/Requirements
- effective upon approval and shall remain in force at all stages of the
proceedings until promulgation of judgment by the RTC
- when appearance is required
C. When:
- bail is a matter of right; a matter of discretion;
- bail as a constitutional right
D. Kinds:
a. corporate surety
b. property bond
c. cash bond
d. recognizance: is an obligation of record entered into before some court
16
or magistrate duly authorized to take it, with the condition to do some particular act particularly
the appearance of the accused for trial
17
E. Suspension of arraignment
a) when suffering from unsound mental condition
b) prejudicial question
c) petition for review
d) absence of judicial personnel
Read: 1. People vs. Estomaca — 256 SCRA 421
2. People vs. Pangilinan — 518 SCRA 359
3. Daan vs. Sandiganbayan — 560 SCRA 233
4. People vs. Janjalani -639 SCRA 157
18
C. Modes of Discovery in criminal cases
Read: People vs. Marta Cristina Servo and Julius Lacanilao, October 9, 2012 For class
discussion. Compare People vs. Webb, Vda. De Manguerra vs. Risos and Go vs. People.
D. The "State-Witness" rule; requirements
Read: Jimenez vs. People, 735 SCRA. Sept. 20/4
People vs. Dominguez, 856 SCRA 109
E. Mistake in charging the proper ofTenses; effects
F. Demurrer to Evidence
Read: Cabador vs. People, 602 SCRA
People vs. Tan, 625 SCRA
Rep. vs. De Borya, 814 SCRA 10 (2017)
G. Reopening vs. New Trial
19
Cases:
1. Macapagal vs. People, 717 SCRA 425, 2/26/14
2. People vs. Morales -616 SCRA 223
3. Quidet vs. People — 618 SCRA I
4. Balaba vs. People - 593 SCRA 210
5. People vs. Olivo - 594 SCRA 77
6. Guasch vs. Dela Cruz - 589 SCRA 297
7. People vs. Taruc - 579 SCRA 682
8. Tiu vs. People - 586 SCRA 118
9. Colinares vs. People — 662 SCRA 266 (probation law)
10. Villareal vs. People, 743 SCRA (probation law)
11. Dungo vs. People, 761 SCRA 375
12. Manansala vs. People, 777 SCRA 563
Read: "The constitutional validity of warrantless search and seizure of prohibited drugs and
eventual arrest". By Jorge Ro Coquia, 610 SCRA 670
Cases:
1. Marimla vs. People, 604 SCRA (2009)
2. People vs. Punzalan, 774 SCRA 653
3. People vs. Nuevas, 516 SCRA (2007)
4. Veridiano vs. People, 826 SCRA (2017)
5. People vs. Cosgafa, 830 SCRA (2017)
6. Miguel vs. People, 833 SCRA (2017)
7. Dimal vs. People, 862 SCRA (2018, plain view doctrine)
8. Reyes vs. People, 865 SCRA (2018)
20