You are on page 1of 12

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/280159040

Numerical and Experimental Analysis of a Waffle Slab Parking Floor

Article  in  Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction · February 2013


DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000164

CITATIONS READS
3 2,401

3 authors, including:

P. F. Schwetz Luiz Carlos Pinto da Silva Filho


Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
23 PUBLICATIONS   30 CITATIONS    353 PUBLICATIONS   765 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Textile Concrete View project

Special Better Performance Concrete View project

All content following this page was uploaded by P. F. Schwetz on 07 August 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Numerical and Experimental Analysis of a
Waffle Slab Parking Floor
Paulete F. Schwetz1; Francisco P. S. L. Gastal2; and Luiz C. P. da Silva Filho3
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

Abstract: Rational and sophisticated structural solutions are essential requirements for structural designers, as a consequence of architectural
design evolution and new building management concepts. Thus, waffle slabs turn out to be an interesting alternative, despite their laborious
numerical modeling. It is necessary to increase knowledge about the structural behavior of and improve the theoretical models used for the
simulation of these slabs. To better understand the behavior of RC waffle slabs, and more realistically quantify stresses and displacements
of this kind of element under actual work conditions, a real-scale ribbed slab was tested and the results are presented in this paper. The chosen
structure, designed to serve as a parking floor, was instrumented with strain and deflection gauges to assess the deformations and deflections
developed under some induced loading conditions. A grillage model and a three-dimensional finite-element model were used for the numerical
study. The data collected indicates that both strategies can be used to obtain adequate estimates of deflections and bending moments. DOI:
10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000164. © 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Author keywords: Concrete slabs; Reinforced concrete (RC); Finite-element method (FEM); Matrix methods; Nonlinear methods.

Introduction simple solutions may not be adequate, because a waffle slab cannot
develop the same torsional moments of a solid slab with the same
The use of waffle slabs gradually is becoming an attractive structural inertia. Therefore, it presents higher bending moments and vertical
solution for designing large office and commercial buildings. The displacements (Coelho 2003).
ribbed system is an evolution of solid slabs and results from the Aiming to better understand the behavior of this type of structural
elimination of a large part of concrete below the neutral axis, which element, to quantify stresses and displacements more realistically,
makes little contribution to ultimate strength. The creation of these a real-scale waffle slab was submitted to load tests and the resulting
voids leads to a reduction of the slab average thickness and, there- strains and deflections were monitored. The results were compared
fore, weight and costs, owing to a more efficient and economical use to estimates obtained from numerical analyses performed using two
of materials. different approaches to represent the structure (a matrix grillage
In Brazil, civil engineers still tend to use conventional structural method and FEM analysis).
arrangements, made of solid slabs and concrete frames. But, in re-
cent years, a marked increase in the use of waffle slabs was noticed.
Thus, it is necessary to develop adequate design guidelines and Experimental Investigation
assessment procedures to ensure that this solution results in good
performance. The problem is that knowledge of RC ribbed slab The slab tested was part of the parking floor of a large commercial
behavior is still very limited, although some interesting numerical building. Fig. 1 shows details of the formwork and geometry
and experimental research results already can be found in the liter- adopted; the structural designer used edge beams and strengthened
ature (Ajdukiewicz and Kliszczewicz 1986; Selistre 2000; Abdul- the region surrounding the central columns with a 37.5-cm-thick
Wahab and Khalil 2000; Soares 2003; Schwetz 2005, 2011). solid slab.
Traditionally, waffle slabs have been analyzed using simplified Reinforcement consisted of steel bars with yielding strength
methods, adapted from the basic theory of elasticity developed for fy 5 500 MPa, as summarized in Table 1. The detailing of the rib
solid slabs. However, experimental tests have shown that these reinforcement can be found in Fig. 2. In addition to positive and
negative reinforcement rebars, the designer specified a welded mesh
for the top slab to control possible stresses developed between the
1
Professor, Associated Researcher, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, ribs. Fig. 3 shows the slab ready to be cast.
Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-190, Brazil (corresponding author). E-mail: paulete The slab was designed using a matricial grillage model from
.schwetz@ufrgs.br TQS 11.9.9 (a computational tool widely used by practitioners in
2
Professor, Civil Engineering Graduate Program, Federal Univ. of Rio Brazil, described subsequently). According to Brazilian standard
Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-190, Brazil. E-mail: francisco [Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT) 2000], it
.gastal@gmail.com considered three different loadings: (1) the slab self-weight of
3
Associated Professor, Civil Engineering Graduate Program, Federal 4:8 kN=m2 ð0:7 lb=in:2 Þ; (2) a permanent load (floor topping) of
Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-190, Brazil. E-mail: 1:0 kN=m2 ð0:15 lb=in:2 Þ; and (3) an accidental load (live load due
lcarlos66@gmail.com
to parked cars) of 3:0 kN=m2 ð0:44 lb=in:2 Þ. Owing to logistical
Note. This manuscript was submitted on August 13, 2012; approved on
January 30, 2013; published online on February 1, 2013. Discussion period limitations, however, in the experimental program the waffle slab
open until August 4, 2014; separate discussions must be submitted for should be submitted only to a load imposed in a localized area. To
individual papers. This paper is part of the Practice Periodical on Structural simplify the loading and unloading process, the test loading was
Design and Construction, © ASCE, ISSN 1084-0680/04014018(11)/ conceived as using compact cars [average weight of 1,000 kg
$25.00. (2,200 lb) or area load of 1:5 kN=m2 ð0:22 lb=in:2 Þ]. Care was taken

© ASCE 04014018-1 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

Fig. 1. Geometry of the waffle slab and position of the localized load

Table 1. Summary of Waffle Slab Reinforcement


Positive Negative
reinforcement reinforcement
Diameter Length Weight Diameter Length Weight
(mm) (m) (kg) (mm) (m) (kg)
6.3 752 188 6.3 69 17
10 2,879 1,814 10 1,222 770
12.5 5,457 5,457 12.5 5,985 5,985
16 635 1,016 16 2,065 3,304 Fig. 2. General position of reinforcement
20 62 155 20 170 425
25 35 138 25 — —
Note: 1 mm 5 0:03937 in:; 1 m 5 39:37 in:; 1 kg 5 2:2046 lb:
so that displacements and strains would not be in excess of those
resulting from the application of the design load, but they should be
adequately measurable in the experimental tests.
With that in mind, using the same software employed by the
structural designer, some numerical simulations were performed to

© ASCE 04014018-2 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


determine an adequate location and size for this loading area. Dif- considering the bending moments developed in the same region. Given
ferent possibilities were considered and the most appropriate, re- this assessment, the defined experimental load was considered ade-
garding the imposed restrictions, was the one shown in Fig. 1. quate for testing the waffle slab behavior in real-life situations.
Numerically obtained vertical displacement estimates consider- It also can be observed in Fig. 4 that, up to load levels of approx-
ing a uniformly distributed incremental load, applied on the whole imately 12 kN=m2 ð1:7 lb=in:2 Þ, the vertical displacements estimated
slab, are shown in Fig. 4. Table 2, on the other hand, indicates that by nonlinear analysis resulted in lower values than the ones obtained
the experimentally applied load plus the self-weight would result by linear analysis. Upon investigation, it was found that this un-
in a maximum displacement of 1.27 cm (0.5 in.). expected outcome derived from the combination of two factors. One is
Consequently, as far as displacements are concerned, it could be that loading levels below this threshold theoretically would cause no
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

considered that the experimental load would be equivalent to an uni- cracking and, therefore, no stiffness loss to the structure. The other is
formly distributed load, applied on the whole slab, which would rep- that, for the sake of simplification, the software used does not consider
resent 30% of the total permanent and accidental design loads together. the presence of the reinforcement for the performance of a linear
As shown in Fig. 4 and Table 2, a similar result would be obtained analysis. It is well known that reinforcement easily could be considered
using a transformed area approach; nonetheless, the authors wanted
to use the software as it is usually used by practitioner engineers.
Nonlinear analyses, however, do account for the presence of the
reinforcement, thus considering a more rigid structure.

Instrumentation

The experiment was conceived aiming to measure strains and ver-


tical displacements at specific points of the slab, as shown in Fig. 5.
In the concrete, strain gauges were placed at four points of the
structure, on the top and bottom faces [Fig. 6(a)]. In the re-
inforcement, two strain gauges were applied in each instrumentation
point, protected with an epoxy-based resin [Fig. 6(b)]. Vertical
displacements were measured using deflection gauges, positioned in
13 points of the slab.

Testing

The test was performed 164 days after the structure was cast
and used 14 similar compact cars (average weight of 1,000 kg
Fig. 3. Slab before casting 5 2,200 lb), as shown in Fig. 7, all weighted before the test. For
logistical reasons, the total load was applied in four steps, using 4, 7,

Fig. 4. Vertical displacements concerning different loads

© ASCE 04014018-3 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


Table 2. Numerically Obtained Vertical Displacements and Bending Analytical Investigation
Moments, within the Loading Area
Vertical In this paper, two numerical simulations were performed, using both
displacement strategies currently employed for designing waffle slabs, with the
aim of assessing how much the adoption of a better and more
Linear Nonlinear Linear bending complex representation of the element, by means of a FEM model,
Load case (cm) (cm) moment (kN×m=m) would affect the results obtained. The output was compared against
Self-weight 0.98 0.88 17.60 data obtained by Schwetz (2011) from a real structure (a waffle slab
Total design load 1.79 1.60 33.20 from a parking garage), to check how well each design strategy
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

Localized area load, 1.27 1.12 23.30 represents actual structural behavior.
including self-weight
Note: 1 cm 5 0:3937 in: Matricial Grillage Model from TQS
The first analysis was performed using the TQS matricial grillage
model for RC structural design. In its linear analysis module, for
the sake of simplification, the contribution of the reinforcement
to the cross-section stiffness was not considered, as mentioned be-
fore. The nonlinear analysis module, however, does consider the
reinforcement and also deals with concrete nonlinearity due to
cracking, based on the recommendations of the Brazilian Con-
crete Code (ABNT 2004).
To give more design flexibility, the software allows the user to
define values for some design coefficients used in the determination
of forces and reinforcement detailing. In the specific case of waffle
slabs, the most relevant choices are related to the structure’s flexi-
bility. The user can change the torsional and/or flexural inertia of the
bars, as well as adjust the stiffness of the connections between beams
and columns.
In the scope of this investigation, however, no reduction on
torsional or flexural stiffness was used for the ribs or edge beams.
Additionally, the connections between ribs and beams and/or beams
and columns were considered fully, aiming to create a realistic
representation of the actual structure. Given the necessary geo-
metrical input data, the software automatically generates a numerical
model of the slab, such as the one seen in Fig. 9.

Finite-Element Model from SAP2000


The same slab analyzed using the TQS grillage method was sub-
jected to FEM analysis, with the help of the well-known commercial
software SAP2000. This computer program enables the user to
perform static linear, nonlinear, and dynamic analyses of different
kinds of structures. The program offers a wide library of elements;
those chosen for use in this work are described subsequently.

Shell Element
The shell element is a type of area element used to model membrane,
plate, and shell behavior in planar and three-dimensional (3D) struc-
Fig. 5. Position of instrumented points tures. The shell material may be homogeneous or layered. Material
nonlinearity can be considered when using the layered shell.

11, and 14 cars, respectively; the positions of the cars are shown in Frame Element
Fig. 8. Initially, the four loading steps were applied in sequence, The frame is an element that uses a general 3D beam-column for-
which defined Load 1. After that, steps 4 and 3 were removed mulation, which includes the effects of biaxial bending, torsion, axial
(Unload 1). Subsequently, the slab was reloaded with steps 3 and deformation, and biaxial shear deformation. The element can be used
4 (Load 2) and, eventually, steps 4, 3, 2, and 1 were removed to model 3D frames, beams, columns, trusses, and planar grillages.
(Unload 2). Deflections and strains were measured and recorded In the current study, both the top slab and the ribs were modeled
at the end of each and every load or unload step. using shell elements, with ribs being considered as eccentric in re-
Control specimen cylinders were cast along with the slab to de- lation to the slab. Frame elements were used only to model the
termine the concrete’s modulus of elasticity (E) and compressive columns. A general view of the model generated using SAP2000 can
strength (fck ), according to the standards of Brazilian Code (ABNT be seen in Fig. 10.
2008). The results obtained were E 5 32:0 GPa ð4,640 ksiÞ and fck Given that the masonry below the edge beams already was raised
5 32:2 MPa ð4,669 psiÞ. in the real structure subjected to the load test, providing a continuous

© ASCE 04014018-4 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

Fig. 6. Position of strain gauges: (a) concrete; (b) reinforcement

and 18, on the other hand, compare the nonlinear numerical results,
using both models, to the measured displacements.
Good agreement is found among all results, showing that both
design strategies are fairly able to represent actual waffle slab de-
formed behavior. Nonetheless, the grillage analysis method indicated
somewhat lower displacements than the FEM, which may be related
to two factors.
One is that the SAP2000 model presents a higher nonlinear to
linear increment in the displacements, as compared to the TQS model
(not considering the reinforcement in the linear analysis), as seen in
Figs. 14 and 16. The other is that the modeling of the solid slab
region, adjacent to the edge beams (Fig. 19), is considered in dif-
ferent ways by each model. Whereas SAP2000 accounts for the
Fig. 7. Structure totally loaded actually informed edge-beam geometry, TQS simulates such solid
regions by automatically generating extra bars. These bars are
created under no control of the user and may have increased the
stiffness of the slab more than necessary.
support along their length, vertical displacement along the edge
beams was prevented on both numerical models.
Strains and Bending Moments
Strains measured at point E1, for concrete and steel, are presented in
Comparing Numerical and Experimental Results Figs. 20–22. Linear behavior is observed again, suggesting no major
cracking occurred in this zone. However, the strain measured in the
In the numerical analyses using both models, loading was consid- reinforcement is higher than the one registered in the surrounding
ered as it was defined in the tests, applying the load of each car in its concrete region. Given that deformations were not compatible
proper position. anymore in such points, it may be assumed that microcracking
patterns were already under development, thus decreasing concrete-
tension capacity and transferring forces to reinforcement.
Vertical Displacements
The uneven distribution of the cars in the loading steps, shown in
The slab presented a quasi-linear deformation behavior during the Fig. 8, also can be noticed here, as happened with the deflections.
test, as observed by the displacement values registered at several The results show tensile stresses in the bottom fibers and compres-
points, such as the two shown in Figs. 11 and 12. It is evident, sion stresses in the top ones, indicating positive bending moments.
however, a deviation in the evolution of the vertical displacements To compare numerical and experimental results, the measured
between the first and second load steps. This effect was caused by the strains were transformed into moment estimates, considering the
adoption of an unequal distribution of cars during the loading equilibrium of internal forces in the instrumented cross sections
process. As illustrated in Fig. 8, in the second load step the vehicles (Park and Paulay 1975).
were positioned along the border of the loading area, thus causing Three values of bending moments were determined for each
a smaller displacement increment than the one registered for the first section as follows:
load step. 1. Experimental uncracked section with ɛ s deduced: it considers
Figs. 11 and 12 also show the existence of residual displacements the uncracked cross section, with the reinforcement strain
after total unloading. Although this may indicate the beginning of inferred from the measured concrete strain gradient.
cracking, there were no visible cracks on the structure. 2. Experimental uncracked section with ɛ s measured: this case
In general, numerical and experimental displacement results also considers the uncracked cross section, but takes into
showed good agreement, as evident in Figs. 13–16. Those figures account the measured reinforcement strain. It estimates the
compare numerical and experimental results in points belonging to cracking moment onset and concerns concrete contribution
Planes A and B (as noted in Fig. 5), for each software. Figs. 17 between cracks (tension-stiffening effect).

© ASCE 04014018-5 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

Fig. 8. (a) First load step; (b) second load step; (c) third load step; (d) fourth load step

3. Experimental cracked section: it considers a cracked section.


Fig. 23 shows the distribution of bending moments obtained
using both numerical models compared to the estimates of bending
moments derived from the experimental results obtained at point E1.
For the more-stressed slab region, the experimental moment
estimate that best compares to the numerical results are the ones
considering the uncracked section. This result is compatible with the
quasi-linear behavior of the displacements, which indicated that the
structure did not behave as a cracked element.

Summary

This paper presented a comparative analysis between numerical and


experimental results obtained for a large waffle slab parking garage.
The results clearly indicate that, whereas present design methods
using grill analogies and FEM analysis are suitable, there is room for
Fig. 9. Grid automatically generated by TQS improvement. They also highlight the importance of performing
experimental studies for checking and adjusting existing numerical

© ASCE 04014018-6 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


models and design methods, especially when dealing with new or
innovative elements.
Some important observations of this work are the following:
• Nonlinear analysis made with the grillage analogy model, using
the TQS system, provided an efficient modeling of the waffle
slab behavior, when full bending and torsion element section
stiffness are provided and full connections are considered be-
tween structural elements. Although the software permits the
use of bar’s stiffness reduction and connection flexibilities, their
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

use was not in the scope of this paper.


• The FEM approach, using SAP2000, also provided an appropri-
ate representation of the structure’s behavior and predicted
displacements and bending moments close to the experimental
results. A finite-element model, however, is far more laborious
than a grillage model.
• The prediction of bending moments within the connections,
between ribs and edge beams and also in the solid slab regions
around columns, is done differently in each model, which can
lead to slightly distinct results. Such discrepancy may be asso-
ciated to the different localized modeling adopted by each
computational program. Thus, it is important to collect experi-
Fig. 10. Model generated by SAP2000 mental data that help define which of the models best represents
this particular aspect of the behavior of a waffle slab.

Fig. 11. Load versus displacement for point P4

Fig. 12. Load versus displacement for point P12

© ASCE 04014018-7 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

Fig. 13. TQS and experimental: Plane A as noted in Fig. 5

Fig. 14. TQS and experimental: Plane B as noted in Fig. 5

Fig. 15. SAP2000 and experimental: Plane A as noted in Fig. 5

© ASCE 04014018-8 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

Fig. 16. SAP2000 and experimental: Plane B as noted in Fig. 5

Fig. 17. TQS, SAP2000, and experimental: Plane A as noted in Fig. 5

Fig. 18. TQS, SAP2000, and experimental: Plane B as noted in Fig. 5

© ASCE 04014018-9 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


Conclusions computational programs, usually based on grillage models and fol-
lowing the local code guidelines.
Waffle slabs represent a very interesting structural solution for large For their analysis, when looking for deflections and moment dis-
office and commercial buildings. They are designed by using different tributions, two different models may be adopted, grillage and finite
elements. The results obtained in this research have shown that both
approaches lead to a good representation of the slab behavior under
service loads. Nonetheless, compared to the simplicity of the grillage
analogy, a finite-element model is very arduous and probably is not
suitable for everyday use in an average structural design office.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

A linear analysis of a waffle slab may be adequate for structures


subjected to low load levels, under cracking limits. It must, however,
consider the actual structural stiffness, including the armature con-
tribution, to more accurately represent the slab behavior.
A nonlinear analysis, using either a grillage or finite-element
model and considering full-element stiffness, adequately repre-
sents deflections and moments under service load levels.
Should deformations and deflections developed by some specific
structure need to be assessed, to confirm numerical estimates or even
to adjust input data or software response, actual slab results may be
obtained. An experimental investigation of a waffle slab behavior
may be adequately done applying some fairly simple load system
and using low-cost equipment, such as strain and deflection gauges.

Acknowledgments

Fig. 19. Solid region adjacent to edge beams


The authors acknowledge the Brazilian Ministry of Science’s Na-
tional Research Council (CNPq) and the Brazilian Ministry of

Fig. 20. Load versus concrete strain at point E1: top face

Fig. 21. Load versus reinforcement strain at point E1

© ASCE 04014018-10 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.


Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul on 08/07/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.

Fig. 22. Load versus concrete strain at point E1: bottom face

Fig. 23. Moments: SAP2000, TQS, and experimental for Plane A as noted in Fig. 5

Education’s Higher Education Human Resources Development Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT). (2008). “Concreto:
Agency (CAPES) for providing the financial support needed to Determinação do módulo estático de elasticidade à compressão.” NBR
develop this project. The authors also express their appreciation for 8522:2008, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (in Portuguese).
the technical support given by the research teams at the Laboratory Coelho, J. (2003). “Análise de lajes nervuradas por analogia de grelha.”
Æhttp://faq.altoqi.com.br/content/245/609/pt-br/an%C3%A1lise-de-lajes-
of Testing and Structural Modeling (LEME) of the Federal Uni-
nervuradas-por-analogia-de-grelha.htmlæ (Nov. 26, 2003) (in Portuguese).
versity of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Projetak–Tavares Eng. Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced concrete structures, Wiley-
Associados S/C Ltda., and Construtora Tedesco for their support Interscience, Christchurch, New Zealand.
of this work. SAP2000 [Computer software]. Walnut Creek, CA, Computers and
Structures (CSI).
Schwetz, P. F. (2005) “Análise teórico-experimental de uma laje nervurada
References modelo reduzido sujeita a um carregamento linear.” M.Sc. disser-
tation, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (in
Abdul-Wahab, H. M. S., and Khalil, M. H. (2000). “Rigidity and strength of Portuguese).
orthotropic reinforced concrete waffle slabs.” J. Struct. Eng., 10.1061/ Schwetz, P. F. (2011) “Análise numérico-experimental de lajes nervuradas
(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:2(219), 219–227. sujeitas a cargas estáticas de serviço.” Doctoral dissertation, Federal
Ajdukiewicz, A. D. and Kliszczewicz, A. T. (1986). “Experimental analysis Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil (in Portuguese).
of limit states in a six-panel waffle flat-plate structure.” ACI Mater. J., Selistre, S. L. C. (2000). “Análise teórico-experimental de uma laje ner-
83(6), 909–915. vurada de microconcreto submetida a um carregamento uniformemente
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT). (2000). “Cargas para o distribuído.” M.Sc. dissertation, Federal Univ. of Rio Grande do Sul,
cálculo de estruturas de edificações.” NBR 6120:2000, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, Brazil (in Portuguese).
Brazil (in Portuguese). Soares, Y. V. (2003). “Análise experimental de lajes cogumelo nervuradas
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT). (2004). “Projeto e de concreto armado com pilares metálicos.” M.Sc. dissertation, Federal
execução de obras de concreto armado.” NBR 6118:2003, Rio de Janeiro, Univ. of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil (in Portuguese).
Brazil (in Portuguese). TQS 11.9.9 [Computer software]. São Paulo, Brazil, TQS (in Portuguese).

© ASCE 04014018-11 Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.

View publication stats Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2014.19.

You might also like