You are on page 1of 1

[This Attachment provides information and requirements applicable to DOE O 232.

2 and contracts

8-30-11
DOE O 232.2
that include the associated CRD (Attachment 1 to DOE O 232.2).]
Causal Analysis Tree Rev. 1

A1 Design / Engineering A2 Equipment / A3 Human A4 Management Problem


A5 Communication LTA A6 Training Deficiency
Problem Material Problem Performance LTA
B1 DESIGN INPUT LTA B1 CALIBRATION FOR B1 SKILL BASED ERROR B1 MANAGEMENT METHODS B3 WORK ORGANIZATION & PLANNING LTA B1 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS B1 NO TRAINING PROVIDED
C01 Design input cannot be met INSTRUMENTS LTA C01 Check of work was LTA LTA C01 Insufficient time for worker to prepare task METHODS OF PRESENTATION C01 Decision not to train
C01 Calibration LTA C01 Management policy guidance/ C02 Insufficient time allotted for task LTA
C02 Design input obsolete C02 Step was omitted due to C02 Training requirements not
C02 Equipment found outside mental lapse expectations not well-defined, C01 Format deficiencies identified
C03 Design input not correct C03 Duties not well-distributed among personnel
acceptance criteria understood or enforced C02 Improper referencing or
C04 Necessary design input not C03 Incorrect performance due C04 Too few workers assigned to task C03 Work incorrectly considered
to mental lapse C02 Job performance standards not branching ―skill of the craft‖
available B2 PERIODIC / CORRECTIVE adequately defined C05 Insufficient number of trained or experienced workers
MAINTENANCE LTA C04 Infrequently performed assigned to task C03 Checklist LTA
B2 DESIGN OUTPUT LTA C03 Management direction created B2 TRAINING METHODS LTA
C01 Preventive maintenance for steps were performed C06 Planning not coordinated with inputs from walk-downs/ C04 Deficiencies in user aids (charts, C01 Practice or hands-on experience
C01 Design output scope LTA incorrectly insufficient awareness of impact etc.)
equipment LTA of actions on safety/ reliability task analysis LTA
C02 Design output not clear C02 Predictive maintenance C05 Delay in time caused LTA C05 Recent changes not made
C04 Management follow-up or C07 Job scoping did not identify potential task interruptions C02 Testing LTA
C03 Design output not correct LTA actions and/or environmental stress apparent to user
monitoring of activities did not C03 Refresher training LTA
C04 Inconsistent design output C03 Corrective maintenance C06 Wrong action selected based identify problems C08 Job scoping did not identify special circumstances and/or C06 Instruction step/ information in
LTA on similarity with other wrong sequence C04 Inadequate presentation
C05 Design input not addressed in C05 Management assessment did not conditions
design output actions C07 Unclear/ complex wording or B3 TRAINING MATERIAL LTA
C04 Equipment history LTA determine causes of previous C09 Work planning not coordinated with all departments
C06 Drawing, specification, or C07 Omission / repeating of event or known problem involved in task grammar C01 Training objectives LTA
B3 INSPECTION / TESTING steps due to assumptions for
data error LTA C06 Previous industry or in-house C10 Problem performing repetitive tasks and/or subtasks B2 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION C02 Inadequate content
completion
C07 Error in equipment or material C01 Start-up testing LTA experience was not effectively C11 Inadequate work package preparation CONTENT LTA C03 Training on new work methods
selection B2 RULE BASED ERROR used to prevent recurrence C01 Limit inaccuracies LTA
C02 Inspection / testing LTA C01 Strong rule incorrectly B4 SUPERVISORY METHODS LTA
C08 Error not detectable C07 Responsibility of personnel not C02 Difficult to implement C04 Performance standards LTA
C03 Post-maintenance / post chosen over other rules well-defined or personnel not held C01 Tasks and individual accountability not made clear to
C09 Errors not recoverable modification testing LTA worker C03 Data/ computations wrong/
C02 Signs to stop were ignored accountable
B3 DESIGN/ and step performed incorrectly incomplete
B4 MATERIAL CONTROL C08 Corrective action responses to a C02 Progress/status of task not adequately tracked A7 Other Problem
DOCUMENTATION LTA LTA C03 Too much activity was C03 Appropriate level of in-task supervision not determined C04 Equipment identification LTA
known or repetitive problem was
C01 Design/ documentation not occurring and error made in prior to task C05 Ambiguous instructions/ B1 EXTERNAL PHENOMENA
C01 Material handling LTA untimely
complete LTA problem solving requirements C01 Weather or ambient conditions
C02 Material storage LTA C09 Corrective actions for C04 Direct supervisory involvement in task interfered with
C02 Design/ documentation not C04 Previous success in use of overview role C06 Typographical error LTA
C03 Material packaging LTA previously identified problem or
up-to-date rule reinforced continued use C02 Power failure or transient
event was not adequate to prevent C05 Emphasis on schedule exceeded emphasis on C07 Facts wrong/ requirements not
C04 Material shipping LTA of rule recurrence
C03 Design/ documentation not methods/doing a good job correct C03 External fire or explosion
controlled C05 Shelf life exceeded C05 Situation incorrectly
identified or represented B2 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT C06 Job performance and self-checking standards not properly C08 Incomplete/ situation not covered C04 Other natural phenomena LTA
B4 DESIGN/ INSTALLATION C06 Unauthorized material LTA communicated
resulting in wrong rule used C09 Wrong revision used B2 RADIOLOGICAL /
VERIFICATION LTA substitution C01 Too many administrative duties
B3 KNOWLEDGE BASED C07 Too many concurrent tasks assigned to worker B3 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
C01 Independent review of C07 Marking / labeling LTA assigned to immediate supervisor PROBLEM
ERROR C08 Frequent job or task ―shuffling‖ NOT USED
design/documentation LTA B5 PROCUREMENT C02 Insufficient supervisory C01 Legacy contamination
C01 Attention was given to C09 Assignment did not consider worker’s need to use higher- C01 Lack of written communication
C02 Testing of design/ installation CONTROL LTA wrong issues resources to provide necessary
order skills C02 Not available or inconvenient to C02 Source unknown
LTA C01 Control of changes to supervision
C02 LTA Conclusion based on C10 Assignment did not consider worker’s previous task use B3 LEGACY
C03 Independent inspection of procurement specifications / sequencing of facts C03 Insufficient manpower to
design / installation LTA purchase order LTA support identified goal/ objective C11 Assignment did not consider worker’s ingrained work B4 VERBAL COMMUNICATION C01 Legacy issues that are not related
C03 Individual justified action patterns
C02 Fabricated item did not meet C04 Resources not provided to LTA to radiological or hazardous material
C04 Acceptance of design / by focusing on biased
requirements evidence assure adequate training was C12 Contact with personnel too infrequent to detect work C01 Communication between work B4 NO CAUSE IS APPLICABLE
installation LTA
provided / maintained habit/attitude changes groups LTA
B5 OPERABILITY OF DESIGN/ C03 Incorrect item received C04 LTA review based on C01 No cause is known for this event
assumption that process will C05 Needed resource changes not C13 Provided feedback on negative performance but not on C02 Shift communications LTA
ENVIRONMENT LTA C04 Product acceptance positive performance
requirements LTA not change approved / funded C03 Correct terminology not used
C01 Ergonomics LTA
C05 Incorrect assumption that a C06 Means not provided for assure B5 CHANGE MANAGEMENT LTA C04 Verification/ repeat back not used USED ONLY FOR ORPS CODING
C02 Physical environment LTA B6 DEFECTIVE, FAILED OR correlation existed between procedures/ documents/ records C01 Problem identification did not identify need for change
CONTAMINATED C05 Information sent but not

Attachment 5
C03 Natural environment LTA two or more facts were of adequate quality and up-
C01 Defective or failed part C02 Change not implemented in a timely manner understood
C06 Individual underestimated to-date
C02 Defective or failed material the problem by using past C03 Inadequate vendor support of change C06 Suspected problems not
C07 Means not provided for assuring
event as basis communicated to supervision
C03 Defective weld, braze or adequate availability of C04 Risks/consequences associated with change not Level A nodes are underlined.
soldering point B4 WORK PRACTICES LTA appropriate materials / tools adequately reviewed/ assessed C07 No communication method
available Level B nodes are in ALL CAPS.

Page 1
C04 End of life failure C01 Individual’s capability to C08 Means not provided for assuring C05 System interactions not considered
perform work LTA [Examples adequate equipment quality, C06 Personnel/ department interactions not considered Level C nodes are in
C05 Electrical or instrument
noise include: Sensory/perceptual reliability, or operability C07 Effects of change on schedules not adequately addressed “Sentence case.”
capabilities LTA, Motor/ C09 Personnel selections did not
C06 Contamination C08 Change-related training/ retraining not performed or not LTA – Less than adequate
physical capabilities LTA, and assure match of worker adequate
Attitude/ psychological profile motivations / job descriptions
LTA.] C09 Change-related documents not developed or revised
C10 Means / method not provided
C02 Deliberate violation for assuring adequate quality of C10 Change-related equipment not developed or revised
contract services C11 Changes not adequately communicated
C12 Change not identifiable during task
C13 Accuracy/ effectiveness of change not verified or not
validated

You might also like