Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English Syntax 6 - Movements in Sentence Transformations
English Syntax 6 - Movements in Sentence Transformations
A. INTRODUCTION
This chapter discusses the movement in sentence transformations. This topic is the
extended discussions of the previous chapter (Chapter 5). The courses will focus on the
types of movements and describing the movements in details. It will include the leftward
movement, passivisation, movements to focus positions, Clefting and pseudo – clefting,
Substtution by Pro-forms, dan Ellipsis.
2. Relevance
This chapter is related to the topic discussions of the previous chapter as it serves as
extended discussions. Besides, this will be relevant to the next discussions.
a. Expected competency
b. Indicators
Be able to analyse the leftward movement
Be able to analyse the movement in passivisations
Be able to analyse the movement to focus position
Be able to analyse the movement by Clefting and pseudo – clefting
Be able to analyse the movement by Substtution by Pro-forms
Be able to analyse the movement in Ellipsis
1. Introduction
All languages have their own rules of syntax. They also have a transformation that
move constituent from one part of the phrase structure to another. Anagbogu (2001) in
Christopher (152) stated that the transformations do not only take a place, there are a lot of
assumptions made by the speakers depending on their relationship. When speaker are
familiar, they presume many things and may delete lexical items from their speech. It is
believed that the more conscripted the deep structure, the more formal the relationship
between the speakers, and the more elaborate the surface structure the more defined the
subject under discourse.
The deep structure really plays a special role in the interpretations of the sentences
and it shows the architecture of the phrase. On the other hand, surface structure results from
applying transformations (movement of categories within the syntactic structure) to form a
question. Furthermore, a transformation takes an existing syntactic structure and renders a
new construction by performing one or more of the following operations: movement,
deletion, or insertion. The transformations of the sentence itself can be done in various ways.
And one of the ways to analyze the sentence transformations is by analyzing its movement
through Leftward movements, passivisations, movement to focus position, clefting and
pseudo – clefting, substitution by pro-forms, and ellipsis, which will be described in details
in the next chapter.
2. Types of Movements
Movement test is a test which has any possibility to take any position in the sentence.
It is likely to be a constituent if it still result a good sentence. If it is possible to move a
particular string from its ordinary position to another position - typically, the begining of the
sentence- that, too is evidence that the string is a constituent. In order to make the result of
NP VP
V NP Adv
A N
The diagram above shows that constituent adverb ‘yesterday’ (Adv) is configured
under the NP. In other words, constituent Adv in inside the VP. The alternation structure of
(1a) is in (1b). What exhibits the movenment in the pair is that the constituent Adv which is
Adv NP VP
V NP
A N
The constituent Adv ‘yesterday’ moves from the one which is under the VP to be at
the same hirachy with NP and VP. Therefore, it makes the constituents under S are not NP
with VP anymore, but Adv, NP, and VP.
NP VP
V NP Adv
Det N
Like the example in (1), the movement in sentence (2a) occurs in the constituent
inside the VP. The diagram above shows that constituent adverb ‘slowly’ (Adv) is
configured under the NP. In other words, constituent Adv in inside the VP. The alternation
structure of (1a) is in (1b). What exhibits the movenment in the pair is that the constituent
Adv which is inside the VP as in (1a) moves to the left (at the begining of the sentence),
raising it to as the constituent under the sentence in the same hirarchy with the NP and VP.
This movement is shown in the following diagram.
Adv NP VP
V NP
A N
The constituent Adv ‘yesterday’ moves from the one which is under the VP to be at
the same hirachy with NP and VP. Therefore, it makes the constituents under S are not NP
with VP anymore, but Adv, NP, and VP.
2.2 Passivization
For examples :
3. a. The man loves the children. (active)
b. The children are loved by the man. (passive)
NP VP
V NP
Det N Det N
NP Aux VP
V PrepP
Prep NP
Det N Det N
The diagram shows that the NP ‘the children’ which is inside the VP is moved to the
beginning of the sentece raising it to take the subject position. This movement upgrades its
hirarchy to the constituent under the S. What can also be explained in the movement of
passivisation is that, there is an additional cosntituent which is created as the result of the
movement. This constituent is Aux ‘are’.
NP Aux VP
V NP
Det N Det N
Like the example (3), example (4) obove shows that the movement in the
passivisation occurs in the constituent NP inside VP. The above is an active sentence in
which the NP ‘the sheep’ in the constituent which will exhibit the movement in the passive
counterpart.
NP Aux VP
V PrepP
Prep NP
Det N Det N
The diagram shows that the NP ‘the children’ which is inside the VP is moved to the
beginning of the sentece raising it to take the subject position. This movement upgrades its
hirarchy to the constituent under the S. What can also be explained in the movement of
passivisation is that, there is an additional cosntituent which is created as the result of the
movement. This constituent is Aux ‘are’ and the form of be in progressive tense ‘being’.
---> The cats, I fed _____. (The dogs, I didn't) I fed the cats.
NP VP
V NP
A N
NP NP fed
In the above diagram, the movement is about focusing the NP as the object of the
sentence to the initial position in the clause. This makes the constituent under the S consists
of two NPs, ‘the cat, and ‘I’.
Clefting changes the original structure of the sentence into an expletive construction
making use of expletive like ‘it’ and ‘there’ and puts emphasis on the particular group of
words. (BAYYAR KHULAR, 2014). Clefting is one of the sentences constructor which is to
transform (changes the form) of simple independent clause in order to gives an emphasis or
changes the focus on particular element of clauses or sentence. The element could be
subject, object, or adverbial. Based on Tallerman, the formula in using clefting test as
below:
The examples in (5a) can be changed into the sentences in (b-d). These are cleft
sentences. (Cleft is from cleave meaning ‘divide’; cleft sentences are ‘divided in two’.) The
general form of cleft sentences is (17)e). In cleft sentences the material between be and that,
underlined in (17)b-d), is focussed, i.e. contrasted with some alternative that the hearer may
have in mind. The relevant point for our purposes is that this material is always a
constituent.
b. It was on Monday that the guests from overseas visited the best parts of the
city.
c. It was the best parts of the city that the guests from overseas visited on
Monday.
d. It was the guests from overseas that visited the best parts of the city on
Monday.
e. It {was/is} X that ... [where X is some constituent]
The constituent from silkworms in (6) may be given more emphasis by placing it at
the beginning of the sentence and 'surrounding' it by the words it was I was.,. that, as
follows:
7(a) and (b) have a different outward appearance (or form), but their content (or
meaning) is more or less the same. The only difference in meaning between them is
that in (b) the element from silkworms is very emphatically contrasted with
something eise in the context (wildsilk moths, in the second coordinate clause): this
contrast is more clearly marked in (b) than in (a).
a. [The talented basketball player] threw the ball over the basket ring.
i. It was the talented basketball player who threw the ball over the basket ring
b. The talented basketball player threw [the ball] over the basket ring
j. It was the ball that the talented basketball player threw over the basket ring
c. The talented basketball player threw the ball [over the basket ring]
k. It was over the basket ring that the talented basketball player threw the ball
d. The talented basketball player [threw] the ball over the basket ring
l. *It was threw that talented basketball player the ball over the basket ring
e. The talented basketball player threw the ball over [the basket ring]
m. It was the basket ring that the talented basketball player threw the ball over.
The clefting test is usually used to give emphasis on subject, direct object, and adverbial.
this one (not to be confused with the generic NP one (=German man))
Complication:
While one in this use is minimally an N', it can also be an NP proform, i.e. an N' with
nothing in the SPEC position: [NP [N' one]]); cf.
I don’t like this [article on pronouns] or that [one]. (one replaces [N' article on
pronouns])
I’m having [a drink]: Would you like [one] too? (one replaces [NP a drink]) (Quirk
et al., p. 387).
She married this one, not the other one. (substitution by one)
(student of linguistics with long hair is an N')
She married the one with long hair. (substitution by one)
Note:
In the text above we refer to constituents of the type [determiner + (modified) noun]
(e.g. the student or the student of linguistics with long hair) as NPs. In a more recent
analysis, determiners are considered to be the head (D°) of a determiner phrase (DP),
The tree diagram of sentence “Sally married a student of linguistics with long hair”.
2.5 Pseudo-Clefting
If we want to emphasise an action, the verb after be usually takes the form that
corresponds to the form used in the what-clause:
In the past simple and present perfect, we can use the following patterns:
If we want to emphasise an action, the verb after be usually takes the form that
corresponds to the form used in the what-cluse. In the following examples, the verb after be
takes the form that the verb in the what- clause is normally followed by:
2.6 Ellipsis
In linguistics, ellipsis (from the Greek ) which means ‘omission’. So, elliptical
construction is the omission of a cause from a clause of one or more words that are
nevertheless understood in the context of the remaining elements. There are numerous
widely acknowledged types of ellipsis. Nine of them are mentioned and briefly illustrated
below: 1) gapping, 2) stripping, 3) VP-ellipsis, 4) pseudogapping, 5) answer fragments, 6)
sluicing, 7) N-ellipsis, 8) comparative deletion, and 9) null complement anaphora.
a. Gapping
Gapping occurs in coordinate structures. Redundant material that is present in the
immediately preceding clause can be "gapped". This gapped material usually contains a
finite verb.
Budi can play the guitar, and Nita can play the violin
Fred likes to pet the cat, and Sally likes to pet the dog.
Stripping is also known as bare argument ellipsis. Many linguists take stripping to
be a particular manifestation of gapping whereby just one remnant appears in the gapped
clause instead of the two (or more) that occur in instances of gapping. The fact that stripping
is limited to occurring in coordinate structures is the main reason why stripping is integrated
into the analysis of gapping:
Aldo can play the piano, and Mary can play the piano, too.
d. Pseudogapping
e. Answer ellipsis
f. Sluicing
Usually Sluicing elides everything from a direct or indirect question except the
question word. It is a frequent type of ellipsis that appears to occur in most if not all
languages. It can operate both forwards and backwards like VP-ellipsis, but unlike gapping,
stripping, answer fragments, and pseudogapping, e.g.:
Mark can play a music instrument, but I don’t know what he can play.
Someone has eaten the soup. Unfortunately, I don't know who. (=who has
eaten the soup).
Nominal ellipsis occurs with a limited set of determinatives in English (cardinal and
ordinal numbers and possessive determiners), whereas it is much freer in other languages.
The following examples illustrate nominal ellipsis with cardinal and ordinal numbers:
Marco did three difficult tasks because Susan had done two difficult tasks.
I heard Mary's dog, and you heard Bill's dog. (Possessive Determiners)
h. Comparative deletion
C. Exercise
Provide tree diagram of the following sentence. Show how movements occur in
the diagrams.
1. Budi can play the guitar and Nita can play the violin.
2. You might do it but I won’t do it.
3. He drinks milk more often than he does drink water.
4. She ordered more beer than we could drink.
5. The first and the second train have arrived.
6. Mark can plai a music instrument but I don’t know what he can play.
D. Summary
E. References