The Connected Child Tracing Digital Literacy From School To Leisure

This article was downloaded by: [McMaster University]
On: 22 December 2014, At: 08:52

Publisher: Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered
office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Pedagogies: An International Journal

Publication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hped20
The connected child: tracing digital

literacy from school to leisure
a b
Anne Mette Bjørgen & Ola Erstad
a
Centre for Lifelong Learning, Lillehammer University College,
P.O. Box 952, 2604 Lillehammer, Norway
b
Department of Education, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1092
Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
Published online: 05 Nov 2014.
Click for updates
To cite this article: Anne Mette Bjørgen & Ola Erstad (2014): The connected child:
tracing digital literacy from school to leisure, Pedagogies: An International Journal, DOI:
10.1080/1554480X.2014.977290
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.977290
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or
howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising
out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
Downloaded by [McMaster University] at 08:52 22 December 2014
Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.977290
The connected child: tracing digital literacy from school to leisure

Anne Mette Bjørgena* and Ola Erstadb
a
Centre for Lifelong Learning, Lillehammer University College, P.O. Box 952, 2604 Lillehammer,
Norway; bDepartment of Education, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1092 Blindern, 0317 Oslo,
Norway
(Received 20 October 2013; accepted 19 June 2014)
This article directs attention to how young students make sense of the connections and
disconnections of digital practices between school and leisure. By using New Literacy
Studies as a frame of reference, we study how students’ conceptions of digital literacies
and their positional identities are defined across school and home. In contrast to most
other studies of similar issues, we study children in the age range from 9 to 13 years
old. The methods used are qualitative interviews and video observations of these
students at three Norwegian primary schools. The analysis shows how various digital
practices in the classroom become meaningful in the translation to leisure time. We
discuss how digital practices initiated in the classroom may be relevant to students’
out-of-school worlds, based on how they get opportunities to unite and translate
practices between these two contexts. This has to do with how school’s digital
practices may be important in connecting identities across contexts. We argue that
the issue of identity must be understood as connected to digital literacy. Our main
thesis is that the school context plays a prominent role in introducing youngsters to
new digital practices that might be important in developing their digital literacies.
Keywords: digital practices; digital literacy; children; identity; school; contexts
Introduction
Recent educational policy and curriculum debates raise questions about children’s engage-
ment in new and changing literacy practices, like content production and social network-
ing, and how their formation of competencies challenge earlier conceptions of literacy and
learning in formal education (Drotner, 2008). However, less attention has been directed
towards how children understand their engagement in various literacy practices involving
digital technology, and how these practices are integrated in their daily lives across
different contexts (Erstad & Sefton-Green, 2013). We need to gain more knowledge
about how such competences and changing literacy practices are negotiated and under-
stood by children themselves in the intersection between different sites, such as formal
schooling and informal practices at home (Ludvigsen, Lund, Rasmussen, & Säljö, 2011).
This is important because the extent to which children are able to position themselves as
learners and to negotiate identity and agency in changing literacy practices has implica-
tions on how we understand and study learning and literacy as an interrelationship
between activities in and out of school (Erstad & Sefton-Green, 2013).
Framed by these issues and with the school context as the point of departure, this
article explores the translation and boundary crossing (Akkerman & Bakker, 2011) of
school-based digital practices into leisure time. The article focuses on how children’s
*Corresponding author. Emails: anne-mette.bjorgen@hil.no; bjorgen@me.com
© 2014 Taylor & Francis

2 A.M. Bjørgen and O. Erstad
digital practices from the classroom intersect with, challenge, and inspire their digital
practices outside the classroom. We explore how students interpret the connections and
disconnections of digital practices in the transition from school to leisure. We investigate
how they sometimes make translations and sometimes define sharp boundaries with
respect to digital practices between these settings. The main focal point is how these
young students make sense of the connection of digital practices from one setting to
another. Our intention is to further contribute to an evolving field of research that
challenges the opposition between children’s engagement in literacy practices inside and
outside the school (Aarsand, 2010; Björkvall & Engblom, 2010).
Our analysis is based on semi-structured interviews and video observations of students
between 9 and 13 years of age in three Norwegian primary schools. In our analysis, we
draw on research from New Literacy Studies (Street, 2003) and theories of identity as
positional (Moje, Luke, Davies, & Street, 2009). Our particular point of focus is on digital
literacies as multiple, complex and contextual. We contend that the relationship between
school and leisure is actually more dynamic and complex than previously assumed, and
the same applies to the ways of conceptualizing learning contexts (Leander, Phillips, &
Taylor, 2010). We perceive children as active and intentional participators in their own
learning (Hedegaard & Fleer, 2008).
The research question is focused on what children might learn from participating in
various digital practices. Our main thesis is that the school context is important for young
students in developing their digital literacy with implications on digital practices outside
of school. The choice of topic is especially relevant, since several countries (Norway,
Finland, Singapore, Australia and other countries) define digital skills and digital literacies
as central to the development of school curricula and as part of twenty-first century skills.
Teachers are now being urged to scaffold the digital practices of the classroom in order to
support connections between the learning space of the school and the sociocultural world
of the student (Mills, 2010, p. 35).
The connected child and New Literacy Studies

There are numerous detailed accounts of children’s engagement in using digital technol-
ogy outside the classroom. The project EU Kids Online (Livingstone, Haddon, Görzig, &
Ólafsson, 2011) indicates that European children are highly connected and engaged in a
variety of activities online and that these might facilitate digital literacy. A recent
Norwegian study indicates that half of the children in kindergarten between 0 and
6 years of age have already been introduced to computers (Gudmundsdóttir &
Hardersen, 2011). Being connected is generally understood as being connected to the
Internet. Our approach is broader and seeks to conceptualize in what manner technology
might be a mediational means capable of drawing connections between contexts in which
digital practices are evident (Ito et al., 2013). Our point of view is in line with insights
from the New Literacy Studies tradition, which during the last two decades has become an
increasingly important lens for studying children’s digital practices within and across a
variety of social contexts (Maybin, 2007). According to Maybin, researchers have tended
to concentrate on children’s literacy practices in the classroom and to highlight the home–
school opposition, especially within minority groups, though often not involving digital
technology.
We are now witnessing a growth of studies concerned with how children draw from a
range of experiences with digital technologies in negotiating practices and meaning
(Bulfin & North, 2007, p. 249). Maybin (2007) re-examines the relationship between
Pedagogies: An International Journal 3
literacy in and out of school by exploring how young students’ informal literacy practices
blend into schools’ formal practices. Björkvall and Engblom (2010) investigate how
students between 7 and 8 years of age become engaged in self-directed learning activities
within literacy practices at school. Aarsand (2010) demonstrates how young boys position
themselves outside and inside the classroom by utilizing negotiating competences on
computer gaming. Katz (2010) documents how immigrant children develop linguistic and
cultural competences in school, or “facilitate their parents’ connections to and under-
standings of traditional and new communication technologies” (p. 299). The underlying
approach in these studies has sought to override the dichotomy between literacy practices
in and out of school, and to extend an idealized and abstract notion of what counts as
literacy, as we often find it in studies of both “schooled” and out-of-school literacy
(Maybin, 2007).
Digital literacy across social practices

During the last decade, digital literacy has emerged as a key term in policy, practice and
research. Still it is often unclear what this term implies. Some researchers have conceived
digital literacy as a narrow set of technical skills (Coiro, Knobel, Lankshear, & Leu,
2008). Building on sociocultural approaches to literacy and learning (Wertsch, 1998), the
so-called New Literacy Studies have defined literacy as embedded and situated in specific
social practices, and also as something that changes over time due to changes in cultural
tools (Street, 2003). We draw on Lankshear and Knobel’s (2006) approach to digital
literacies “(…) as socially recognized ways of generating, communicating and negotiating
meaningful content through the medium of encoded texts within contexts of participation
in Discourses (or as members of Discourses)” (p. 64).1 For our purpose, discourse can be
seen as social context, like school, family, group of friends, online social groups, etc.
Building on insights from New Literacy Studies, we employ notions that connect
school and leisure through theories of practice. Learning is approached as the capacity to
adapt to changing roles when participating in practices within different contexts (Hull &
Schultz, 2002). We investigate how children frame their own participation in various
digital practices in terms of why and how they use computers in playing and learning
activities. The concept of practice directs attention towards the interplay between indivi-
dual definitions of digital practices and contexts; that is, how children gain opportunities
to access digital practices as resources for action and agency, and how they participate in
new ways of experiencing themselves as successful participants among family, friends,
classmates and teachers. Both school and leisure-time contexts are arranged in certain
ways and with specific intentions that direct individual framings and social practices. This
implies that using computers to read, play or communicate mean different things at school
and in leisure (Lankshear & Knobel, 2006). We approach context as something we
produce as we choose and contextualize cultural resources as relevant in certain activities
and settings (Van Oers, 1998). The notion of contextualization is helpful in recognizing
how context matters, and at the same time highlights connections and relations. This
approach runs counter to traditional approaches to context as some surrounding activities,
like classrooms (Van Oers, 1998).
In New Literacy Studies, the link between learning and identity is central. Learning is
not just about learning something, but to become someone. Who you want to be, is
influenced by what are available resources and the socially recognized ways of thinking
and acting within the social practices you operate in (Moje et al., 2009). Our argument
about positional identity is about how children make sense of the differences between
digital practices inside and outside of school (Bulfin & North, 2007). We approach
identity as something dynamic that may change on the basis of participating in practices,
rather than as something given or static. Transformation of practice is about perceptions
and experiences of what are the available resources, and of the expectations we encounter
in specific contexts (Hull & Greeno, 2006). The notion of identity as positional and as
related to agency provides opportunities to study how children appear and reveal them-
selves in certain activities when using computers. With these issues in mind, it is pertinent
to discuss how teachers facilitate such possibilities, a matter we touch upon in the final
section.
Rather than approaching school and home/leisure as opposing contexts and the digital
practices of children in these contexts as having little relevance to each other, we highlight
the dynamic and constitutive relationship between practices and contexts. We argue that
the ability to understand contexts and different ways of participating in digital practices
are vital aspects of digital literacies. This includes the capacity to recognize and explore
digital content and ways of utilizing cultural resources across learning contexts, whether
you intend to compose digital stories in the classroom or chat with friends while at home.
When referring to this approach for studying digital literacies, we emphasize that we
do not assume in a naïve way that it is an easy task to study connections between digital
practices in and out of school. Especially not since it is commonly assumed that the digital
practices of children in leisure time are somehow more interesting or advanced than in
school settings (Palfrey & Gasser, 2008).
A Norwegian context
Today most young people in Norway have good access to digital media both at home and
at school (Arnseth, Hatlevik, Kløvstad, Kristiansen & Ottestad, 2007). Girls tend to be
more engaged in social networking than boys, while boys are more engaged in computer
gaming (Brandztæg, 2005). Experiences of digital practices, such as writing texts and
applying information, are widely reported in both school and leisure time contexts. There
is less knowledge of experiences in both contexts with respect to content production
(Arnseth et al., 2007). Such findings indicate that young people do not experience wholly
different digital practices in leisure and at school. The media ecology of Norwegian
children in the age group 9–13 years is comparable with international studies suggesting
that digital practices are closely connected with social interests and activities with families
and friends. Parents are important in terms of how digital media are used within the home
setting, and in offering support to ways of connecting with schools (Ito et al., 2010, 2013).
Studying digital practices in Norwegian school settings is interesting in several
respects. Most importantly, the national curriculum of 2006 defines “digital skills” and
“digital competence”, including knowledge, creativity and attitudes, as one of five basic
skills and competencies running through all subjects, and on all levels. The other four
basic skills are reading, writing, numeracy and oral skills. The curriculum aims to bridge
the perceived gap between the use of digital technology inside and outside of school by
committing both teachers and students to use digital media as part of learning activities at
school (Arnseth et al., 2007). The data presented in our study were collected in an early
phase of the implementation of the new national curriculum. Within both research and
practice, there has been an increased interest in Norway concerning issues of digital
literacy.2
Methodology
In this study, the main method of data collection has been qualitative interviews and video
observations. Our intentions using qualitative interviews have been to increase our under-
standing of the articulated experiences and perceptions of a sample of Norwegian
students. Our findings cannot be generalized and regarded as true of Norwegian children
in general. The aim is rather to contribute to the development of theories by means of
analytical generalization (Kvale, 1997). The methods were selected in order to gain access
to the meaning-making of children in their use of computers, both at school and at home.
The methods were also used to investigate how different digital practices at school
appeared to this particular age group. Concerning leisure time, we did not have direct
access to practices at home, but rather the ways in which these children made sense of
their practices by talking to the researcher in personal interviews and with peer groups in
focus group interviews (Wetherell, Taylor, & Yates, 2001).
Since the interviews took place at school, it is relevant to reflect upon whether the
answers could have been influenced by the context and the manner in which they were
recorded. This might have limited the way the students expressed themselves about ways
of using computers outside of school. However, our impression was that they elaborated
quite a lot in their meaning-making about ways of using computers in different contexts.
The responses show how they relate to both the differences and similarities between
school and leisure practices and how digital practices flow between contexts. The children
quickly became accustomed to the recording equipment. Since our focus is on school
settings, we link this to practices outside of school as the students talk about this in the
interviews or as part of the observations. As it can be challenging to interview youngsters
at this age level, we used observations of school practices to support and validate data
interpretation. Observations can enhance our understanding of how interpretations and
practices are framed by contextual factors.
Data and context of the study

The data were collected by video observation and semi-structured interviews with 37
students between 9 and 13 years (from fifth to seventh grade) in three classes in three
primary schools, all representative for Norwegian schools in terms of size, technical
equipment, numbers of students and teachers and socio-economic status. The schools
were equipped with their own computer rooms and some computers were additionally to
be found in the classrooms. According to the students, they did not have access to
computers on a daily basis. They used computers mainly for project-related work. At
the time of data collection, the schools participated in a national project called “Learning
Networks” (http://www.itu.no/no/Om_ITU/English/). The project sought to gain more
knowledge about changing pedagogical practices using digital technology. It also sought
to enhance students’ and teachers’ digital skills in accordance with the new curriculum
and to prevent digital divides among students and schools. The schools in this study were
strategically selected as representative of schools with extensive experience of using
digital technologies as a central component in teaching and learning.
The video observation focused on digital production in three classrooms, especially on
what the students were talking about in front of the computer screen. We were interested
in how they positioned themselves, their competences and how they negotiated ways to
work and select content. The students worked in groups of two or three and we
concentrated on the most active groups. The observation period lasted for 6 weeks and
resulted in over 300 episodes. The episodes lasted between 15 seconds and 4 minutes.
All interviews took place at school and each interview lasted for about 45 minutes.
Twenty-four interviews were carried out with individual students, eight in each class, and
four interviews were conducted in groups of 3–5 classmates (one for each school and two
groups in the largest school). Teachers assisted in the selection of students for the inter-
views. We started each interview by asking them to tell about their favourite digital practice
in general. We asked them to elaborate on how and why they were engaged in different
kinds of digital practices, and how these practices were different or similar at school and at
home, for example, about using search engines, communication tools, computer gaming and
content production, like Power Point and digital stories. The study was introduced to
teachers and parents, and it was emphasized that participation was voluntary and complied
with the ethical codes of the Norwegian Social Science Data Service.
Data analysis
The transcribed interviews and video episodes were analysed on the basis of being open to
how the main themes emerged from the data. The first phase after data collection
consisted in transcribing all the interviews in addition to processing the field notes for
coding. The next phase focused on close reading of all the transcribed interviews to get
some impressions of themes and overall issues that came up in these interviews (Bernard
& Ryan, 2010). The third phase was to upload all the text files to the software programme
Transcriva in order to proceed on coding the data. The coding was done according to our
main interest in possible connections and disconnections between ways of using digital
media inside and outside of school in the ways the students talked about this. The coding
labels and protocols followed the two main categories of inside and outside of school, as
well as a third category where they explicitly talked about the interconnection. Based on
this coding and analysis, we identified four main themes of interest for this article
focusing mainly on the role of school practices using digital media for developing digital
literacy across different contexts.
Extracts from the videos were used to illuminate the main themes in the interviews.
Since we focus on the situatedness of actions, in this case on how computers as media-
tional means represent potentials for realizing participation and learning in specific
contexts, “mediated action” becomes relevant as the analytical unit (Wertsch, 1998, p.
24). A focus on mediated action oriented our construction of the interview-guide as well
as the analysis in itself.
The four main themes that were identified as common patterns in the interviews with
the students were all related to the theme of connections and disconnections between
school and out-of-school practices and opinions using digital media. These themes are all
important because they say something essential about ways of understanding digital
literacy among students at this age, about their different ways of positioning themselves
within the possibilities and constrains of these contexts, and about the role of school
activities.
(A) Defining differences and similarities.

(B) School introduces young students to new digital practices.
(C) Defined as irrelevant in leisure time.
(D) Changing status of digital literacy within family.
Digital practices in motion from school to leisure

We have grouped the presentation of the results from the empirical study into the core
themes mentioned above. The excerpts are selected from the larger corpus of data because
they offer typical configurations of how digital practices are either connected or discon-
nected between the school and the leisure contexts.
Theme A: defining differences and similarities

Our material provides several examples illustrating that digital practices differ in school
and leisure-time contexts in terms of intentions, goals, rules, norms and the structuring of
time. Asking students about differences and similarities using computers at school and in
leisure time provided descriptions about how contexts matter in different ways. While
schools often focus on finishing tasks on time, by, for example, using search engines to
finding facts to include in assignments, the leisure-time context offers opportunities to

linger in the process without necessarily having to focus on the end product or time
constrains (Drotner, 2008). The following examples from our material illustrate this point.
Roger, an 11-year-old boy in sixth grade, referred to what he called huge differences
related to using computers doing schoolwork at home versus in the classroom:
I guess I would have been working a bit slower … because then I wouldn’t have anything
else to do, and then I could cool down a bit. But at school, if we are allowed to finish
homework you finish it at once. But being at home I do some other things while doing
homework, so then it will take some more time (…) sometimes I’ll eat a sandwich or
something or I watch television and stuff while doing it (Roger, sixth grade).
Roger’s explanation can be seen as an example of how contexts regulate and structure
digital practices. Sophie, a 10-year-old girl in fifth grade loved to be outdoors with her
friends and to play music and handball, and to communicate with friends and family at
Nettby3 and chat-services. She used the Internet to search for information “to see what I
might find”. Sophie’s view illustrates that everyday digital practices are influenced by
what children experience as important, exciting and relevant at that particular moment
(Drotner, 2008). The home seems to be a context that encourages a strategy characterized
by having no beginning or end. Sophie’s way of searching can to a certain degree be
understood as a radical learning practice since it displays inconclusiveness and making
things up as you go along. According to Drotner (2008), through engagement with digital
technology in leisure time children experience that learning can be different from being
taught at school. The following example from a video observation in a fifth-grade class-
room can also illustrate this point. When negotiating how to colour their digital story, two
boys discussed their use of Google in leisure time:
Eric: You know, Oliver, at home I look up stuff about dinosaurs on Google. Do you
do that?
Oliver: Yes, sometimes.
Eric: I watch videos so as to find out how to do things. And I look for pictures too,
for my homework.
The example shows how the boys drew on their leisure-time experiences and interests in
technology into the production practice in the classroom. Eric used to spend a lot of time
at home creating Power Point presentations about his favourite interest, namely dinosaurs.
Other examples from our observations also reveal how such “unofficial literacy activities”
(Maybin, 2007, p. 6) from leisure time, became visible in and intersected with “official
literacy practices” in the classroom. Eric and Oliver were in charge of explorative
processes nurtured by self-styled digital practices and non-linear forms of learning,
where they gained knowledge about particular rules, norms and technical requirements
for online communication and information searching (Drotner, 2008, p. 172ff).
By drawing on these examples, we suggest that Roger, Sophie, Eric and Oliver
might experience how identity, developed in different contexts, can support or rub
against each other. Eric was one of the most technically skilled students in his class,
and during the time of production he helped in scaffolding other students as well as
the teacher. By this, he positioned himself as a successful learner. In the classroom
context, content production and information searches crossed boundaries, and were
seen to be supporting similar activities, but with different scopes and objectives.
However, the teacher did not seem to notice their informal literacy practices blending
into the formal literacy practices. Taken together, the examples presented above
illustrate how school has an important role mediating connections between identities
developed in different contexts. By this, school can contribute to develop students’
awareness on how to utilize resources for learning across contexts, as part of becoming
digitally literate.
Theme B: school introduces young students to new digital practices

Both the video observations and the interviews contain a rich collection of examples on
how school introduces students to computer programmes and digital practices, such as
Movie Maker and Photo Story for storytelling and Power Point, to present assignments
and homework. These practices were new to many students, as these utterances
exemplify:
I had never heard about Photo Story as a programme, as we use it at school, … it is a bit
funny. And I learn new things also, how to write or fix things by using Word and such
programmes (John, 12 years, seventh grade).
Yes, it is for instance to learn to use new things that might be useful at school and for
homework and stuff, as for instance Its Learning, Power Point. Many students don’t know
how to use this yet (Cole, 11 years, sixth grade).
The examples emphasize that children’s experiences of digital practices introduced at

school represent new ways of doing things, like writing and arranging content. New
programmes offer new possibilities to manage learning at home and at school. Digital
content production in the classroom provides opportunities to cooperate and take turns as
mentors, as Eric introduced above. During content production at school, students tended
to work in groups of two and three to find facts, create and present stories about, for
instance, foreign countries, geography or language. The teacher confirmed the importance
of giving them time and space to play with new devices. Many defined Power Point as a
relevant resource to translate into leisure-time activities related to personal interests,
hobbies and family life in general. Anna, a 10-year-old girl in fifth grade is a typical
example. She started to make covers for schoolbooks after being introduced to Power
Point in the classroom:
Anna: I make covers for schoolbooks and the like, or for school projects and the
like, or just drawings on Paint if I don’t have anything else to do.
Interviewer: What do you find the most exciting?
Anna: Covers, because there are so many strange images that can be used (. …)
And it is possible to paste in images, for example cars or the like (. …), I
can change the colour and such.
Interviewer: How do you use the things you make?
Anna: I just make them and then erase them if I don’t want them any longer.
This excerpt illustrates how computers and Power Point are being interpreted as powerful
tools for the production and sharing of social content in leisure time. Anna also used to
create book covers for her little sister. Our material embraces a range of examples on how
students translate practices initially introduced at school into cultural production at home.
Andrew, also a fifth grader, owned a lot of pets and he was very interested in animals. He
described how he started to use Power Point at home to create books about animals.
Together with his friends, Andrew took pictures to put into books.
These examples reveal that children’s digital literacies can be traced from the class-
room context into the leisure-time context. In this process, their competences are being
challenged by new opportunities provided by technology. As technology becomes part of
learning activities, the activities in question change (Cole, 1996). As a consequence,
students are forced to make a number of choices that are different from using pencil
and paper, like Anna, uttering that she could “change the colour and such”. Many students
expressed both uncertainty and playfulness when exploring content production pro-
grammes: “You have to press that one … what is wrong with that key?” (Christian,
fifth grade). “We pick that one, it is computer-ish” (Sophie, fifth grade). Such utterances
illustrate how digital content production at school can provide competences that are
different from, but at the same time additional to competences gained in leisure time.
But, as some of the students mentioned, not everyone had access at home to programmes
used in school.
Based on these examples, we suggest that school plays an important role in offering
access to, and introduce young students to new digital tools and practices, as for instance
in presenting digital content. By providing opportunities for engagement in explorative
production practices that blend into more familiar practices, school can enhance experi-
ences of learning that nurture identity and agency. However, and maybe more important
than translating into the home context, by being introduced to these programmes, students
learn to cope with classroom demands in ways of learning with technology. Specifically,
they need to learn how to use technology in the classroom in order to learn subject matter.
Theme C: defined as irrelevant in leisure time

Despite the fact that our material is rich in examples illustrating how digital practices in
schools become integrated in children’s leisure-time practices, there are also some exam-
ples showing that digital practices from school are framed as irrelevant in leisure.
Cordelia’s (fifth grader) answer is typical: “We don’t learn a lot at school, or on the
computer. Or … we learn new things but we don’t use it at home, only if it is homework”.
Her utterance, together with similar ones, illuminates that some students make a fairly
clear-cut distinction between how they engage in digital practices inside and outside of
school, especially for some activities using digital media.
When asking a group of 11-year-old boys (sixth grade) about how digital storytelling
and content production programmes can be relevant in leisure time, one of them con-
sidered that it might be relevant – but under certain conditions: “(…) if I had bothered. I
made a snowboard movie as sort of a test. I am snowboarding”. These excerpts show that
outside the classroom students want to create content about matters of relevance to their
personal interests. They struggle to combine identities developed inside and outside of the
school contexts. The boy’s perceptions of his own identity as learner did not seem to
mediate action or promote agency. Teachers might intend to include technology to connect
the learning spaces of school to the student’s broader sociocultural worlds. At the same
time, teachers have to develop the student’s skill in mastering digital practices related to
academic learning typical of the school context.
Theme D: changing status of digital literacy within family

Our study further shows how the family is an important context for encouraging the use of
digital media. This is supported by studies of children and media use in general
(Livingstone, 2009). Digital technology provides children with the possibility of partici-
pating and sharing experiences in new ways, and hence to experience themselves as
successful learners and participants in the family. From the examples presented below, it is
possible to suggest that the position of children within their families might change due to
their skills and experiences in using digital technologies. In a group interview, Marie and
Christina explain how technology in education intervenes in family life:
When I come home talking to mum, then she says, like this, “have you heard about the
presidential election and stuff?” Then I tell her everything I know (…) She thinks it is nice
that we have Smartboard since we learn a lot more. We watch the news every day at school
(Marie and Christina, sixth grade).
This excerpt illustrates how digital expertise related to the presidential election enables
children to interact as competent interlocutors with their parents. Students strengthened
their positions as competent contributors into the family using competencies from school.
To quote Katz (2010), children can “broker”, or “facilitate their parents’ connections to
and understandings of traditional and new communication technologies” (p. 299). Katz
sees children’s brokering activities as a form of dynamic interplay between parents and
children, allowing parents to contribute with their adult understandings and experience of
the world. Our material contains a range of examples where the children explain how
mum and dad or older siblings help and guide them if they encounter technical difficul-
ties. Parents might position their children as experts in digital technology, and traditional
parent–child relationships might change. However, it is not the technical expertise in itself
that is important here, but what the technology allows children to do. New digital
practices learned in school can provide children with new roles as mentors and experts,
as well as letting them experience new learning identities related to who they are and what
they are capable of doing (Hull & Greeno, 2006). Our material reveals how important it is
for the children to present their digital productions to family members. Many of the
children experienced the opportunity to present their digital content productions to family
and friends. Anna in fifth grade, introduced above, often showed her schoolbook covers to
her mum and dad. Eric, also a fifth grader, argued that he liked the idea of making “others
learn something”. Engagement in digital practices offers opportunities to experience “(…)
a shifting sense of agency” (Moje et al., 2009, p. 432). Our results contribute to nuance
traditional understandings of the technology use relationship between adults and children
(Ito et al., 2010).
Discussion – tracing digital literacies from school to leisure

The examples presented in this article illuminate how children interpret and understand
digital practice in different ways according to the activities, intentions, goals, values, rules
and contextual requirements. This is nothing new. However, what is important here is the
way children’s framings and understandings of digital practices can influence how they
perceive that they can bring their learning in digital practice between school and leisure.
Individual interpretations have a bearing on whether learning can be realized across the
school and recreational context (Lantz-Andersson, 2009). The way children perceive the
possible transitions and breaks between digital practice in and out of school has also to do
with opportunities to position who they want to be, namely to position their identities as
learners. As our examples indicate, children explain that computers offer new ways of
learning, and that learning to operate the technology results from exploring it as inter-
twined in daily activities, related to personal interests, needs and possibilities (Erstad,
2010). The children in our study engaged in new digital practices at school, while
transforming and reshaping them at home by creating new content, for instance as covers
for schoolbooks, or by using and reusing content based on other goals and intentions.
However, some of them did not manage to translate digital practices from school into
leisure-time practices. They framed school’s digital practices as irrelevant or meaningless
for their leisure-time interests in technology. Our data reveal that sometimes children are
able to make translations and sometimes they define sharp boundaries between digital
practices across school and leisure-time contexts. Hence, it is advisable to view digital
practices as intersecting across contexts, but in each case offering different levels of
potentials for realizing participation and learning in specific activities and contexts.
This article seeks to direct attention towards what exactly schools might mean for
digital practices among young students. Based on our findings, we suggest that school
plays an important role by bringing children into contact with new digital practices that
urge them to compare and contrast these practices with digital practices outside school,
thus training their capacity for critical judgement. Our findings indicate that tracing digital
literacies from school to leisure has to do with critical abilities connected to the capacity to
recognize, transform and explore content and methods across learning contexts. The
students communicated an awareness on how contexts regulate and structure their use
of search engines and programmes. They expressed conscious reflections about how to
use computers and programmes based on what is accepted within school and leisure. We
suggest that tracing digital literacies from school to leisure has to do with an awareness of
contexts. This implies being able to manage and utilize different “literacy-practices”
outside of and inside the classroom (Lankshear & Knobel, 2006).
School is still a central site for competence formation and democratic participation and
has the potential to provide access to all kinds of media as mutual resources to all children
(Drotner, 2008). Based on this, the school is an important arena for linking identities
across contexts. We argue that the concept of positional identity (Hull & Greeno, 2006)
can be helpful in understanding the way children make sense of the differences and
similarities between digital practices inside and outside school. The concept of positional
identity makes it possible to discuss how children might experience the way engagement
in digital practices produce alternative ways to behave and learn, whether this includes
“learning new things” by using Power Point, or engaging in new roles as content-
producers and experts. For instance, if the teachers had integrated Anna’s habit of creating
schoolbook covers by using Power Point as a topic for discussion in the class, maybe
Anna and her classmates would become more conscious about potential connections and
disconnections between school-based and leisure time-based knowledge. Positional iden-
tity relates to choice of content and ways of working. In our material, this can be seen
operating both within leisure-time digital practices, like in movies about snowboard, and
within school-based digital practices like digital stories and Power Point presentations. We
argue that digital practices from school offer opportunities to be attentive towards and
understand one’s own identity as learners as vital to literacy performance. This has to do
with the ability to identify learning resources and contexts in a proper manner to ensure
that these resources can be mobilized (Erstad, Gilje, Sefton-Green, & Vasbø, 2009, p.
105).
Towards twenty-first century competencies

The issues presented in this article are important because they point towards contemporary
discussions about twenty-first century skills and literacies (Griffin, McGaw, & Care,
2012). The examples discussed direct attention to broader conceptualizations of digital
literacy as a cultural competence, integrating aspects like basic technical skills, analysing
the media as object in itself, being critical to content and technology and acquiring
learning strategies for searching and utilizing information and learning to learn. In other
words, digital literacy as a cultural competence implies learning within, and being part of
a digital culture (Buckingham, 2006).
Based on our empirical findings, it is possible to argue that positional identity
contributes vital aspects to an understanding of digital literacies. This includes the
importance of being conscious of and recognizing different cultural resources available
to us across contexts and situations. Hence, digital literacies can be conceptualized as
mediational means (Wertsch, 1998) preparing individuals to change their ways of parti-
cipating in and recognizing different digital practices across contexts. This approach is in
line with recent research highlighting the necessity of understanding learning as connected
across learning contexts (Erstad & Sefton-Green, 2013; Ito et al., 2013). This viewpoint
calls for broader and more in-depth perspectives on digital literacies in schools, as
proposed by Buckingham (2003) and Lankshear and Knobel (2006). This implies con-
necting learning in meaningful ways to the learner’s identities and social and cultural
practices, providing the possibility of integrating new with established practices. A broad
approach involves providing opportunities to engage and compare, as well as contrast and
reflect upon different literacy practices in different settings with the goal of critically
navigating different practices (Lankshear & Knobel, 2006). It is important that schools
help students understand how contextual framings and their own meta-cognitive inter-
pretations of these might impact on how they learn in the intersection between formal and
informal learning. We are not suggesting that digital practices in classrooms should
resemble digital practices in leisure. Rather, we should recognize that – from the chil-
dren’s point of view – there is and there should be a difference between home and school,
but also similarities understood as border crossings or bridges between practices. We need
to rethink education and the use of technology adopted in an unequivocally child-centred
approach (Buckingham, 2003).
This article has shown that there is no simple answer to complex pedagogical issues
regarding cultural continuity versus discontinuity between home and school. We have
outlined some possible themes that are central to children’s digital practices in various
everyday contexts. More research is needed to obtain a fuller picture of how children
understand learning mediated by digital practices across different learning contexts.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all blind reviewers and Professor Pär Nygren (Lillehammer University
College) who have contributed to this article.
Notes
1. Their definition is inspired by Scribner and Cole’s (1981) conception of social practice as “(…)
a recurrent, goal-directed sequence of activities using a particular technology and a particular
system of knowledge” (p. 235), and by Gee’s (1990) distinction between Discourse and
discourse (as cited by Lankshear & Knobel, 2006, p. 12ff).

2. Several research communities are doing research on digital literacy, for instance,
InterMedia (http://www.uv.uio.no/english/research/groups/intermedia/), Transaction (http://
www.uv.uio.no/english/research/groups/transaction/index.html) and the Research Centre
for Child and Youth Competence Development (http://www.hil.no/eng/research_areas/
child_and_youth_competence_development_ph_d/phd_program). A national centre has
been established for research and development concerning these issues (Centre for
Information and Communication Technology in education (https://iktsenteret.no/english)).
Several conferences have been held targeting teachers and school leaders, and the provision
for digital literacy in teacher education has been a priority.
3. Nettby was a popular Norwegian website which closed down in 2010: http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Nettby
Notes on contributors
Anne Mette Bjørgen is an associate professor at the Department of education and social work. She is
also a specialist in educational media at the Centre for lifelong learning at Lillehammer University
College, Norway. She has published on issues of technology and learning, digital literacy and digital
competence, as well as on issues of distance and flexible education. She is also a member of
research groups studying technology in education, media education and child and youth competence
development at Lillehammer University College. Her research interests evolve around how we
engage in digital practices including digital technology in educational settings and everyday life.
Ola Erstad is a professor at the Department for Educational Research, University of Oslo, Norway.
He has been working both within the fields of media and educational research. He has published on
issues of technology and education, especially on “media literacy” and “digital competence”. He is
leader of a research group called “TransAction” and is leading several research projects studying
media use among young people and the interrelationship between formal and informal ways of
learning.
References
Aarsand, P. (2010). Young boys playing digital games: From console to the playground. Nordic
Journal of Digital Literacy, 5(1), 38–55. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2010/01/
art04
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of
Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435
Arnseth, H. C., Hatlevik, O., Kløvstad, V., Kristiansen, T., & Ottestad, G. (2007). ITU Monitor
2007: Skolens digitale tilstand 2007 (pp. 1–184). Oslo: Forsknings- og kompetansenettverk for
IT i utdanning (ITU).
Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Los
Angeles, CA: Sage.
Björkvall, A., & Engblom, C. (2010). Young children’s exploration of semiotic resources during
unofficial computer activities in the classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3),
271–293. doi:10.1177/1468798410372159
Brandztæg, P. B. (2005): Gender differences and the digital divide in Norway. Is there really
a gendered divide? Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/789520/Gender_differences_and_
the_digital_divide_in_Norway-is_there_really_a_gendered_divide
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy: What do young people need to know about digital
media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4, 263–277. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/
dk/2006/04/defining_digital_literacy_-_what_do_young_people_need_to_know_about_digital
Bulfin, S., & North, S. (2007). Negotiating digital literacy practices across school and home: Case
studies of young people in Australia. Language and Education, 21(3), 247–263. doi:10.2167/
le750.0
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new
literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of
research on new literacies (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: The Belknap Press
of Harvard University Press.
Drotner, K. (2008). Leisure is hard work: Digital practices and future competencies. In
D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 167–184). Cambridge, MA: The
MIT Press.
Erstad, O. (2010). Educating the digital generation: Exploring media literacy for the 21st century.
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 5(1), 56–72. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/
2010/01/art05
Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., Sefton-Green, J., & Vasbø, K. (2009). Exploring “learning lives’’: Community,
identity, literacy and meaning. Literacy, 43(2), 100–106. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2009.00518.x
Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Digital disconnect? The ‘Digital learner’ and the school. In
O. Erstad, & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age
(pp. 87–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies. Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills.
Heidelberg: Springer.
Gudmundsdóttir, G. B., & Hardersen, B. (2011). Småbarns digitale univers: 0–6-åringers tilgang til
og bruk av digitale enheter på fritiden. Panelundersøkelse utført høsten 2011. Oslo: Senter for
IKT i utdanningen. Retrieved from https://iktsenteret.no/sites/iktsenteret.no/files/attachments/
smabarns_materie_digitalfil.pdf
Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2008). Studying children: A cultural-historical approach. Maidenhead:
Open University Press.
Hull, G., & Greeno, J. G. (2006). Identity and agency in nonschool and school worlds. In
Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places: The informal
education reader (pp. 77–97). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2002). School’s out: Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom
practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Tripp, L. (2010).
Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., & Watkins, S. C. (2013).
Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and
Learning Research Hub.
Katz, V. S. (2010). How children of immigrants use media to connect their families to the
community. Journal of Children and Media, 4(3), 298–315. doi:10.1080/
17482798.2010.486136
Kvale, S. (1997). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. Oslo: Ad notam Gyldendal.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning.
Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Lantz-Andersson, A. (2009). Framing in educational practices: Learning activity, digital technology
and the logic of situated action (Doctoral dissertation). Göteborg Universitet, Göteborg.
Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning:
Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34, 329–394. doi:10.3102/
0091732X09358129
Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Livingstone, S. M., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the
internet: The perspective of European children. Full Findings EU Kids Online. Retrieved
from http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20(2009-
11)/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/D4FullFindings.pdf
Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I., & Säljö, R. (Eds.). (2011). Learning across sites. New tools,
infrastructures and practices. Oxford: Routledge.
Maybin, J. (2007). Literacy under and over the desk: Oppositions and heterogeneity. Language and
Education, 21(6), 515–530. doi:10.2167/le720.0
Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn’’ in the New Literacy Studies. Review of
Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271. doi:10.3102/0034654310364401
Moje, E. B., Luke, A., Davies, B., & Street, B. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the
metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4),
415–437. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.4.7
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital. Understanding the first generation of digital natives.
New York, NY: Basic Books.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Street, B. V. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory
and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91. Retrieved from http://
devweb.tc.columbia.edu/i/a/document/25734_5_2_Street.pdf
Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488.
doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00031-0
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. (2001). Discourse theory and practice. A reader. London:
Sage.

The Connected Child Tracing Digital Literacy From School To Leisure

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Connected Child Tracing Digital Literacy From School To Leisure

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

This article was downloaded by: [McMaster University]

On: 22 December 2014, At: 08:52

Pedagogies: An International Journal

The connected child: tracing digital

Click for updates

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.977290

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

The connected child: tracing digital literacy from school to leisure

*Corresponding author. Emails: anne-mette.bjorgen@hil.no; bjorgen@me.com

© 2014 Taylor & Francis

The connected child and New Literacy Studies

Digital literacy across social practices

Data and context of the study

(A) Defining differences and similarities.

Digital practices in motion from school to leisure

Theme A: defining differences and similarities

finding facts to include in assignments, the leisure-time context offers opportunities to

Theme B: school introduces young students to new digital practices

The examples emphasize that children’s experiences of digital practices introduced at

Theme C: defined as irrelevant in leisure time

Theme D: changing status of digital literacy within family

Discussion – tracing digital literacies from school to leisure

Towards twenty-first century competencies

discourse (as cited by Lankshear & Knobel, 2006, p. 12ff).

You might also like