Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Martella Thomas
Summary:
Standards and curriculums cannot compete with each other they have to work hand-in-hand.
Curriculums work with standards in order to create optimal learning experiences for students. Standards
must be analyzed and unpacked because they may be too broad, too narrow, or may reflect multiple goals
simultaneously. Analyzing standards helps to explain the intentions behind the standards. The meaning of
a standard may not always seen as clear as it is written. When teachers are able to fully understand the
standards then they can create instruction that will meet those standards. Analyzing all relevant
information regarding the standard will enable educators to accurately assess student performance.
Standards are typically written in a very broad format. A common misconception is that lessons and units
should be organized in the same way in which standards are. Standards are typically organized in a list
and that is how many educators create instruction but this is not always the best practice. Multiple goals
in a standard also call for standards to be unpacked. Breaking the goals up instead of keeping them all
Once standards have been analyzed and unpacked educators can create curriculums, instruction,
and assessment that will help to best educate students. Assessments have to accurately assess standards
but this is not always something that happens. Standards that are listed and taught have to be explicitly
assessed and taught to. Looking at the standards in the design of assessments are necessary but it is not
the only thing that has to be done. If standards truly been met then educators will be confident in the
ability of their students. A criticism of U.S. education is that assessments administered in the classroom
and grades do not often predict the performance level of students on state or national exams. S.M.A.R.T
goals call for educators think more critically about goals. S.M.A.R.T - specific, measurable,
attainable, relevant, time-related these are the components of S.M.A.R.T goals. Applying the
S.M.A.R.T model when creating these goals would allow students reach goals more easily and
Comparison
This lesson is focusing on looking at possible amendments that were sent to the states for
ratification in1789. In the lesson students will analyze a primary source, develop persuasive
arguments, and gain insight into the process by which the Bill of Rights came to be. The lesson
has some clearly listed goals that can connect back to a state standard for an American History
course. The procedures in the lesson accurately reflect the objectives that are listed. Looking at
the beginning of the lesson the teacher began by explaining to students exactly what a document
is .This is the first step to meet in the goal of analyzing a document as a primary source. The
guiding questions in the lesson procedure also will help students be able to meet the objectives of
the lesson.
Contrast
One objective for this lesson is too broad and one is too narrow. One objective says to
gain insight into the process by which The Bill of Rights came to be, this has a very narrow
focus. The objective could focus on the Constitution as a whole and also focus on those factors
that influenced the way the creators of the Bill of Rights were thinking at the time. The objective
that says to develop persuasive arguments is very broad it could have been expounded upon. At
the end of this lesson I think assessing students on the goal of analyzing primary sources could
have been included as well. Re-creating the lesson goals using the S.M.A.R.T format would be a
good idea. The lesson objectives do not totally answer the who,what,when,where, and why
References
The Bill of Rights: Debating the Amendments | Classroom Materials at the Library of
Congress | Library of Congress. (2021). Retrieved 10 April 2021, from
https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/bill-of-rights-debating-the-amendments/
Wiggins, G., McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). The Understanding by design guide
to advanced concepts in creating and reviewing units (pp. 3-18). Alexandria, Va.:
ASCD.