Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/248391977
methyl ornge
CITATIONS READS
0 538
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Hassen Trabelsi on 16 June 2017.
The photo-degradation of an aqueous solution containing the azo dye methyl orange
(MO) is reported. Disappearance of color and substrate together with decreases in
chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) content were
observed. The effects of some auxiliary dyeing additives were also evaluated. The
photo-decomposition followed pseudo-first-order kinetics. Some by-products and their
photo-degradation pathways were identified. In addition, the toxicity and phytotoxicity
of some by-products were tested using the earthworm (Eisenia andrei) avoidance test
and the Bromus ramosus seed germination test. High sensitivity of E. andrei towards
soil wetted with MO solution was observed, and germination of B. ramosus seeds
was inhibited by MO solution, while no effects were seen for the same solution after
photocatalytic oxidation.
Keywords: TiO2; methyl orange; photo-decomposition; intermediate products; toxicity
1. Introduction
Synthetic dyes are mainly used in textile and paper industries (Gupta et al. 1992; Wrobel,
Boguta, and Ion 2001), besides many other chemicals such as surfactants, chelating agents,
and pH regulators. The resulting, highly polluted wastewater is complicated to treat due to
the presence of non-biodegradable compounds. Various methods have been developed for
removal of synthetic dyes from such wastewaters with the aim of attenuating their impact on
the environment. The conventional water treatment methods such as sedimentation, filtra-
tion, chemical and membrane technologies have high operating costs and often lead to toxic
secondary pollutants that also have to be treated (Gaya and Abdullah 2008). Advanced oxi-
dation processes (AOPs) are promising for treatment of wastewaters containing recalcitrant
organic compounds. In this regard, processes utilizing hydrogen peroxide (Esplugas et al.
2002; Pera-Titus et al. 2004) or ozone as oxidants (Colindres,Yee-Madeira, and Reguera
2010; Shu and Chang 2005), semiconductors as photocatalysts (Bansal, Singh, and Sud
2010) and electrochemical oxidation (Martınez-Huitle and Brillas 2009) have been thor-
oughly investigated. Among these, TiO2-mediated photo-oxidation is established for the
decolorization and the mineralization of dyes using either ultraviolet (UV) or solar light (Al-
Qaradawiand Salman 2002; Hachem et al. 2001; Lihong et al. 2012). However, more work
is required to identify by-products (Tanaka, Padermpole, and Hisanaga 2000), photo-
degradation pathways (Konstantinou and Albanis 2004) and toxicity evaluation of the
treated medium. Hence, in this work, a heterogeneous photocatalytic system has been used
to perform the oxidation of the water soluble azo dye methyl orange (MO) which
corresponds to the 40 -sulfonic acid derivative (pKa ¼ 3.47) and the above-mentioned
requirements were addressed. This dye was selected as a model on the basis of its industrial
consumption, water solubility, and toxicity, while the tested concentrations were aimed to
simulate typical exhausted dye bath compositions following water rinse (Pisa Textile Dyeing
Co., Istanbul, Turkey, 2006, personal communication). The photocatalytic oxidation was
carried out in aqueous suspensions of TiO2 (Degussa P25) irradiated by UV light. The decol-
orization of MO aqueous solution, the evolution of total organic carbon (TOC) and chemical
oxygen demand (COD) were investigated for process efficiency evaluation. Determination
of the photocatalytic oxidation pathway and the identification of the main formed intermedi-
ates were performed. The effect of some auxiliary dyeing additives such as Cl, SO42 and
S2O82 ions on the dye photo-degradation rate was also investigated. Indeed, these ions are
usually present in real wastewater produced by textile industry (Bansal, Singh, and Sud
2010) as they are added to the liquor used to perform the operation of scouring, i.e. the treat-
ment that removes wax, dirt, grease and other natural impurities from the fibers before the
dyeing process. Finally, since new attractive options for a possible water reuse either for a
subsequent dyeing process after relatively short plants treatment for agricultural and/or other
industrial activities are of increasing concern (Bradley et al. 2002; Lapena, Cerezo, and
Garcıa-Augustin 1995), the toxicity and phytotoxicity of the raw and treated solutions were
also evaluated by means of earthworm avoidance tests and germination of B. ramosus seeds.
2. Experimental section
2.1 Photocatalytic reaction and dark adsorption
MO (purity >97%) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) as a commercially
available dye without any further purification. The dye’s chemical structure and its main
characteristics are shown in Table 1. Solutions were prepared using bidistilled water. The
TiO2 powder (P25) was obtained from Evonik Degussa (Parsippany, NJ, USA) and contains
anatase and rutile phases in a ratio of about 4:1. It has a Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET)
surface area of 50 m2 g1. An open air Pyrex immerged lamp reactor, equipped with a
plunging tube containing a 125 W UV lamp (HPK, Philips, Holland) was used emitting in
the range from 200 to 400 nm. A Corning 0.52 filter was used to cut off radiation below the
wavelength of 340 nm. The tube had a Pyrex cylindrical jacket with circulating water to
avoid overheating of the liquid to be treated. The intensity of the UV radiation reaching the
reactor (l > 290 nm) was measured by a radiometer (HD9021, Delta Ohm, City, Country)
and estimated to be 6.67 107 einstein s1 (mole of photons). An aqueous photocatalyst
suspension was prepared by adding 1000 mg TiO2 powder to 1000 mL MO solution. The
photo-degradation was carried out at 293 K and at neutral pH. Before any analysis, the
aqueous sample was filtered through a 0.45 mm membrane filter to remove TiO2
agglomerates in the suspension. The effect of some auxiliary dyeing additives such as
Cl, SO42 and S2O82 on the photocatalytic decolorization was also evaluated. All experi-
ments were run in triplicate and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was used to express
the errors of analysis.
authors have shown that the classical Langmuir adsorption model could be applied to
numerous compounds in aqueous suspensions (Hachem et al. 2001; Saquib and Muneer
2002). At the equilibrium, the adsorbed quantity could be calculated according to the fol-
lowing expression:
Kads Ceq
Qeq ¼ Qmax ;
1 þ Kads Ceq
where Ceq corresponds to the concentration of the compound at the adsorption equilib-
rium and Qeq corresponds to the adsorbed equilibrium quantity. The linear transform of
the above equation can be expressed as Ceq/Qeq ¼ f(Ceq). The linearity of the transform
indicates that the Langmuir isotherm fits well MO dark adsorption on TiO2 catalyst
implying a monolayer adsorption model (Figure 2). The maximum adsorbed quantity
Qmax of the dye, the adsorption constants Kads as well as the areal density of the adsorbed
dye molecules Dmax were determined and were, respectively, Qmax ¼ 39.84 mg/gcat,
Kads ¼ 3.4 102 L mg1 and Dmax ¼ 1.47 molecules nm2. We recall that the word
“areal” refers to a surface area unit as defined by Robert and Burwell (1977) in the
IUPAC report.
Figure 2. Linear transform of Langmuir isotherm illustrated by plot of Ce/Qe vs. Ce. Experimental
conditions: m (TiO2) ¼ 1 g; V ¼ 1000 mL; T ¼ 25 C; natural pH.
6 H. Trabelsi et al.
Figure 3. Disappearance rate of methyl orange azo dye in 9.16 104 mol L1 solution (~) pho-
tocatalysis () without TiO2.
Figure 4. Change in the absorption spectra during the photo-degradation of MO at the initial con-
centration C0 ¼ 9.16 104 mol L1 in an aqueous TiO2 suspension (1000 mg L1) and natural pH.
and sulfates. Sakthivel et al. (2003) have reported similar trend in TOC removal under
similar conditions and demonstrated that the complete decolorization of the acid brown
14 occurs in 300 min and the complete degradation was achieved in 420 min. Therefore,
it could be expected that more aggressive conditions are required to achieve higher TOC
removal than those employed to simply break the chromophore group.
Figure 5. COD (a) and TOC removal (b). Experimental conditions: [MO]0 ¼ C0 ¼ 9.16 104
mol L1; m (TiO2) ¼ 1000 mg; T ¼ 25 C; natural pH.
MO solution was studied. The obtained results are shown in Figure 6. Logarithmic linear-
ization of results reported in Figure 3 is also illustrated in the insert of Figure 3. The val-
ues of the apparent first-order rate constant kapp deduced from the slope of the linear
regression and corresponding to different solution compositions are regrouped in Table 2.
From the insert of the Figure 6, it can be seen that the photocatalytic degradation of MO
is a pseudo-first-order reaction. The confirmation of the first-order rate kinetics was
derived from the linearity of the plot. Among the anionic species studied, Na2SO4 exhib-
ited the strongest inhibition effect followed by NaCl as also found by Daneshvar et al.
(2003) and Epling and Lin (2002). Inhibition effects of anions can be explained as the
reaction of positive holes and hydroxyl radical with anions that behaved as hþ and OH
scavengers (Equations (1)–(5)) resulting from prolonged color removal. According to
Bahnemann et al. (1994) and S€ €
okmen and Ozkan (2002), the adsorbed anions compete
with the dye for the photo-oxidizing species on the surface and prevent the photocatalytic
degradation of the dyes. Also, the formation of inorganic radical anions (e.g. Cl, SO4)
under these circumstances is possible to occur (Abdullah et al. 1990;Chen et al. 2007):
Cl þ hþ
VB !Cl or Cl þ OH!ClOH ; ð1Þ
þ
4 þ h !SO4 ;
SO2 ð2Þ
4 þ OH!SO4 þ OH :
SO2 ð3Þ
The literature reports that although the reactivity of these radicals may be considered,
they are not as reactive as hþ and OH (Hu et al. 2003), and thus the observed retardation
Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry 9
Figure 6. (a) Kinetics of the photocatalytic degradation of MO in the presence of different anionic
additives. (b) first-order linear transform lnC0/C ¼ f (t). Experimental conditions: an aqueous TiO2
suspension (1000 mg L1); [MO]0 ¼ C0 ¼ 9.16 104 mol L1; T ¼ 25 C; natural pH.
effect is still thought to be related to the strong adsorption of the anions on the TiO2 sur-
face. Indeed, the addition of sodium peroxydisulfate Na2S2O8 was beneficial for the
photo-oxidation of MO. The disappearance profile of MO confirmed this behavior, clearly
indicating a neat mineralization rate increase when S2O82 is added. The reactive radical
intermediate (SO4) formed from this oxidant by reactions with the photogenerated elec-
trons can exert a dual function: as a strong oxidant itself and as an electron scavenger,
thus inhibiting the electron–hole recombination at the semiconductor surface (Gr€atzel
et al. 1990). Other fact, it was also noticed that in the presence of S2O82 the pH
decreases in the course of reaction up to the value of 2.4 for all the runs due to formation
of hydrogen ions according to the following reactions:
8 þ eCB ! SO4 þ SO4 ;
S2 O2 ð4Þ
2
SO þ
4 þ H2 O ! SO4 þ OH þ H :
2
ð5Þ
The positive influence of S2O82 on the mineralization rate of MO is also due to the
strong decrease of pH during photocatalysis which probably enhances the photoreactivity
of titanium dioxide. Guettaı and Ait Amar (2005) have demonstrated that best results are
obtained in the oxidation of MO in acidic medium.
Table 3. GC–MS data for intermediates obtained after 30 min of photocatalytic degradation of
methyl orange.
1
306 ([M–H] þ,14);
8.282 189 (18);
147 (100); 73 (54)
2 9.373 292(Mþ,10);
191 (100);
147 (56); 73 ( 68)
of intermediates detected; some of these intermediates were also found by other research-
ers (Augugliaro et al. 2002; Baiocchi et al. 2002; Bianco Prevot et al. 2004; Comparelli
et al. 2005; Coutinho et Gupta 2009; Ruan et al. 2001). The degradation products formed
by the cleavage of the azo bond of the dye molecule are not the primary reaction inter-
mediates. The sample after 30 min of radiation showed the peak at tR ¼ 11.035 min (m/z
304 of medium intensity) attributed to the ionization of the dye molecule and another
peak at tR ¼ 14.74 min (m/z 320), which corresponds to the monohydroxylated product
of MO. There is a numerical agreement between some molecular weights and the hypoth-
esis of the formation of monohydroxylated derivatives that appear, respectively, at m/z
320, 306, and 292 and the dihydroxylated product with m/z 322. Considering that the
methyl group can be easily separated from the dimethylamino group in the monohydroxy-
lated compound, we suggest that the compound of m/z 306 is produced by heterolytic
breaking of the nitrogen–carbon bond resulting in the substitution of the methyl group by
the hydrogen atom as also stated by Dai et al. (2007). Further loss of one methyl group
and the introduction of two hydroxyl groups to benzene ring of the quinonoid species in
the ionized dye molecule with m/z ¼ 304 may lead to form a compound with m/z ¼ 322.
All the intermediate compounds detected by GC–MS still hold the chromophore moiety
so that the photo-bleaching cannot be linked to their formation, but could reasonably be
due to the formation of smaller molecules. After 90 min of UV irradiation, the degrada-
tion products of MO subsequently decrease without visible formation of new products by
GC–MS. Further oxidation gives rise to the opening of the aromatic ring leading to the
formation of alcohols, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids. Eventually, the mineralization of
MO leads to produce CO2, H2O, SO42, NH4þ and NO3 (Lachheb et al. 2002).
Figure 7. Avoidance responses (average þ SD) of Eisenia andrei to OECD artificial soil contami-
nated by residual MO solutions irradiated during 0, 30, 60 and 180 min. An indicates statistical
differences (p < 0.0001) by the Fischer’s exact test, i.e. a significant avoidance response of the test
soil. Data points above the dotted line indicate limited habitat function of the respective soil,
according to the Hund–Rinkecriteria (Hund-Rinke and Simon 2005).
Figure 8. Germination index of Bromus ramosus in raw and treated MO solution as a function of
reaction time under UV illumination, using TiO2 catalyst.
Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry 13
germination of B. ramosus was strongly inhibited by the raw as well as by the 30 min a
photocatalysed solution reflecting the recalcitrant nature of MO. However, as photocatal-
ysis progressed, a fast increase of GI was observed probably linked to a decrease of by-
products phytotoxicity. At 180 min, the GI reaches a maximum of 91% and the toxicity
of the treated solutions falls within the non-toxic range as classified by Wang et al.
(2001) and Tamer et al. (2006). Hence, our data indicated that after a definite time, no
germination inhibition of B. ramosus by MO metabolites at (350 mg L1) concentration
was noticed. In this way, it is worth noting that Parshetti et al. (2006) showed that the ger-
mination of T. aestivum using a raw malachite green solution is less compared to an irri-
gation test using a photocatalysed solution and the control test. Anyhow, we can suggest
that the germination of seeds using any photo-degraded dye solution could help promot-
ing the reuse of the treated water in the irrigating field under certain circumstances. In the
light of our findings, it is suggested that methyl-orange photo-treated solution should be
used precautiously for irrigation of agricultural lands.
4. Conclusions
Decolorization of an aqueous solution contaminating a stable azo dye MO was achieved
using UV/TiO2 photocatalytic process. Almost 92% of the decolorisation of relatively
high concentrated MO solution (C0 ¼ 9.16 104mol L1) was obtained after 180 min of
irradiation using HPK 125 UV immerged lamp reactor. The high concentration of dye
solution is used to simulate real colored wastewater. The disappearance of color together
with the abatement of COD and TOC contents were monitored. It was found that the reac-
tion of MO degradation follows the first-order kinetic model. The presence of inorganic
ions such as SO42 and Cl, which are usually present in real wastewater produced by
textile industry, has an inhibitory effect on MO degradation in a sequence of SO42>Cl.
The experiments also demonstrated that the addition of the peroxydisulfate ion, S2O82
in MO/TiO2 suspension leads to a higher degradation rate, which is beneficial to the treat-
ment of azo dye wastewater. The determination of the nature of the principal organic
intermediates and the evolution of the mineralization will help further understand the
mechanistic studies of the photocatalytic reaction. The structures of the transient inter-
mediates formed during the photocatalytic process are consistent with a degradation route
mainly based on demethylation, methylation and hydroxylation processes. The demethyl-
ation seems to take precedence over the hydroxylation process, but the hydroxylation
mechanism results in the most intermediates in the present system. Further oxidation
gives rise to the opening of the aromatic ring leading consequently to the complete miner-
alization. Finally and according to invertebrate and plant bioassays, it was confirmed that
photocatalytic reaction destroys the toxicity of the MO mother molecule.
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Ms. Hajer Rebai for her kind help in brushing the English of the
manuscript.
References
Abdullah, M., G.K.C. Low, and R.W. Matthews. 1990. “Effects of Common Inorganic Anions on
Rates of Photocatalytic Oxidation of Organic Carbon over Illuminated Titanium Dioxide.”
Journal of Physical Chemistry C 94: 6820–6825.
14 H. Trabelsi et al.
Al-Qaradawi, S., and S.R. Salman. 2002. “Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange as a Model
Compound.” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A 148: 161–170.
Augugliaro, V., C. Baiocchi, A.B. Prevot, E. Garcia-Lopez, V. Loddo, S. Malato, G. Marci, L.
Palmisano, M. Pazzi, and E. Pramauro. 2002. “Azo-dyes Photocatalytic Degradation in Aque-
ous Suspension of TiO2 under Solar Irradiation.” Chemosphere 49: 1223–1230.
Bahnemann, D., J. Cunningham, M.A. Fox, E. Pelizzetti, P. Pichat, N. Serpone, R.G. Zepp, and G.
R. Heltz. 1994. Aquatic Surface Photochemistry, 261–316. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.
Baiocchi, C., M.C. Brussino, E. Pramauro, A.B. Prevot, L. Palmisano, and G. Marc. 2002.
“Characterization of Methyl Orange and Its Photocatalytic Degradation Products by HPLC/UV-
VIS Diode Array and Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass
Spectrometry.” International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 214: 247–256.
Bandara, J., V. Nadtochenko, J. Kiwi, and C. Pulgarin. 1997. “Dynamics of Oxidant Addition as a
Parameter in the Modelling of Dye Mineralization (Orange II) Via Advanced Oxidation Tech-
nologies.” Water Science and Technology 35: 87–93.
Bansal, P., D. Singh, and D. Sud. 2010. “Photocatalytic Degradation of Azo Dye in Aqueous TiO2
Suspension: Reaction Pathway and Identification of Intermediates Products by LC/MS.” Sepa-
ration and Purification Technology 72: 357–364.
BiancoPrevot, A., A. Basso, C. Baiocchi, M. Pazzi, G. Marcı, V. Augugliaro, L. Palmisano, and
E. Pramauro. 2004. “Analytical Control of Photocatalytic Treatments: Degradation of a Sulfo-
natedazo Dye.” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 378: 214–220.
Bradley, B. R., G.T. Daigger, R. Rubin, and G. Tchobanoglous. 2002. “Evaluation of Onsite Waste-
water Treatment Technologies Using Sustainable Development Criteria.” Clean Technologies
and Environmental Policy 4: 87–99.
Chen, C.C., C.S. Lu, Y.C. Chung, and J.L. Jan. 2007. “UV Light Induced Photodegradation of Mal-
achite Green on TiO2 Nanoparticles.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 41: 520–528.
Chen, Y.P., S.Y. Liu, H.Q. Yu, H. Yin, and Q.R. Li. 2008. “Radiation-induced Degradation of
Methyl Orange in Aqueous Solutions.” Chemosphere 72: 532–536.
Colindres, P., H. Yee-Madeira, and E. Reguera. 2010. “Removal of Reactive Black 5 from Aqueous
Solution by Ozone for Water Reuse in Textile Dyeing Processes.” Desalination 258: 154–158.
Comparelli, R., E. Fanizza, M.L. Curri, P.D. Cozzoli, G. Mascolo, and A. Agostiano. 2005.
“Photocatalytic Degradation of Azo Dyes by Organic-capped Anatase TiO2 Nanocrystals
Immobilized onto Substrates”. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 60 (1–2): 1–11.
Coutinho, C. A., and V.K. Gupta. 2009. “Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange Using Poly-
mer–titania Microcomposites.” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 333: 457–464.
Dai, K., H. Chen, T. Peng, D. Ke, and H. Yi. 2007. “Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange
in Aqueous Suspension of Mesoporous Titania Nanoparticles.” Chemosphere 69: 1361–1367.
Daneshvar, N., D. Salari, and A.R. Khataee. 2003. “Photocatalytic Degradation of Azo Dye Acid
Red 14 in Water: Investigation of the Effect of Operational Parameters.” Journal of Photochem-
istry and Photobiology A 157: 111–116.
Elghniji, K., O. Hentati, N. Mlaik, A. Mahfoudh, and M. Ksibi. 2012. “Photocatalytic Degradation
of 4-Chlorophenol under P-modified TiO2/UV System: Kinetics, Intermediates, Phytotoxicity
and Acute Toxicity.” Journal of Environmental Sciences 24: 479–487.
Epling, G.A., and C. Lin. 2002. “Photoassisted Bleaching of Dyes Utilizing TiO2 and Visible
Light.” Chemosphere 46: 561–570.
Esplugas, S., J. Gimenez, S. Conteras, E. Pascual, and M. Rodrıguez. 2002. “Comparison of Differ-
ent Advanced Oxidation Processes for Phenol Degradation.” Water Research 36: 1034–1042.
Galindo, C., P. Jacques, and A. Kalt. 2000. “Photodegradation of the Aminoazobenzene Acid
Orange 52 by Three Advanced Oxidation Processes: UV/H2O2, UV/TiO2 and VIS/TiO2: Com-
parative Mechanistic and Kinetic Investigations.” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology
A 130: 35–40.
Gaya, U.I., and A.H. Abdullah. 2008. “Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Con-
taminants over Titanium Dioxide: A review of Fundamentals, Progress and Problems.” Journal
of Photochemistry and Photobiology C 9: 1–12.
Gr€atzel, C.K., M. Jirousek, and M. Gr€atzel. 1990. “Decomposition of Organophosphorus Compounds
on Photoactivated TiO2 Surfaces.” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 60: 375–387.
Guettaı, N., and H. Ait Amar. 2005. “Photocatalytic Oxidation of Methyl Orange in Presence of
Titanium Dioxide in Aqueous Suspension. Part I: Parametric Study.” Desalination 185: 427–
437.
Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry 15
Gupta, G. S., S.P. Shukla, G. Prasad, and V.N. Singh. 1992. “China Clay as an Adsorbent for Dye
House Wastewaters.” Environmental Technology 13: 925–936.
Hachem, C., F. Bocquillon, O. Zahraa, and M. Bouchy. 2001. “Decolourization of Textile Industry
Wastewater by the Photocatalytic Degradation Process.” Dyes and Pigments 49: 117–125.
Hu, C., J.C. Yu, Z. Hao, and P.K. Wong. 2003. “Effects of Acidity and Inorganic Ions on the Photo-
catalytic Degradation of Different Azo Dyes.” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 46: 35–47.
Hund-Rinke, K., and M. Simon. 2005. “Terrestrial Ecotoxicity of Eight Chemicals in a Systematic
Approach.” Journal of Soils and Sediments 5: 59–65.
Ince, N.H., Stefan M.I., and Bolton, J.R. 1997. “UV/H2O2 Degradation and Toxicity Reduction of
Textile Azo Dyes: Remazol Black-B, a Case Study.” Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technolo-
gies 2: 442–448.
Japanese Industrial Standards Committee. 1998. Testing Methods for Industrial Wastewater: (Japa-
nese Industrial Standards-K0102). Tokyo: Japanese Industrial Standards Committee.
Komilis, D.P., E. Karatzas, and C.P. Halvadakis. 2005. “The Effect of Olive Mill Wastewater on
Seed Germination after Various Pretreatment Techniques.” Journal of Environmental Manage-
ment 74: 339–348.
Konstantinou, I.K., and T.A. Albanis. 2004. “TiO2-assisted Photocatalytic Degradation of Azo Dyes
in Aqueous Solution: Kinetic and Mechanistic Investigations A Review.” Applied Catalysis B:
Environmental 49: 1–14.
Martınez-Huitle, C.A., and E. Brillas. 2009. “Decontamination of Wastewaters Containing Syn-
thetic Organic Dyes by Electrochemical Methods: A General Review.” Applied Catalalyis B:
Environmental 87: 105–145.
Lachheb, H., E. Puzenat, A. Houas, M. Ksibi, E. Elaloui, C. Guillard, and J.M. Herrmann. 2002.
“Photocatalytic Degradation of Various Types of Dyes (Alizarin S, Crocein Orange G, Methyl
Red, Congo Red, Methylene Blue) in Water by UV-irradiated Titania.” Applied Catalalyis B:
Environmental 39: 75–90.
Lapena, L., M. Cerezo, and P. Garcıa-Augustin. 1995. “Possible Reuse of Treated Municipal
Wastewater for Citrus spp. Plant Irrigation.” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 4:
87–99.
Lihong, Y. X. Jingyu, L. Ming-De, C. Han Hung Tat, S. Tao, P. David Lee, and C. Wai Kin. 2012.
“The Degradation Mechanism of Methyl Orange under Photo-catalysis of TiO2.” Physical
Chemistry Chemical Physics 14: 3589–3595.
Parshetti, G., S. Kalme, G. Sartale, and S. Govindwar. 2006. “Biodegradation of Malachite Green
by Kocuriarosea MTCC 1532.” Acta Chimica Slovenica 53: 492–498.
Pekakis, P. A., N.P. Xekoukoulotakis, and D. Mantzavinos. 2006. “Treatment of Textile Dye House
Wastewater by TiO2 Photocatalysis.” Water Research 40: 1276–1286.
Pera-Titus, M., V. Garcıa-Molina, M.A. Banos, J. Gimenez, and S. Esplugas. 2004. “Degradation of
Chlorophenols by Means of Advanced Oxidation Processes: A General Review.” Applied Cata-
lalyis B: Environmental 47: 219–256.
Rismayani, S., M. Fukushima, H. Ichikawa, and K. Tatsumi. 2004. “Decolorization of Orange II by
Catalytic Oxidation Using Iron (III) Phthalocyanine-tetrasulfonic Acid.” Journal of Hazardous
Materials 114: 175–181.
Robert, L., and Jr. Burwell. 1977. “Manual of Symbols and Terminology for Physicochemical Quanti-
ties and Units – Appendix II Heterogeneous Catalysis.” Advances in Catalysis 26: 351–392.
Ruan, S., F. Wu, T. Zhang, W. Gao, B. Xu, and M. Zhao. 2001. “Surface State Studies of TiO2
Nanoparticles and Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange in Aqueous TiO2 Dis-
persions.” Materials Chemistry and Physics 69: 7–9.
Sakthivel, S., B. Neppolian, M.V. Shankar, B. Arabindoo, M. Palanichamy, and V. Murugesan.
2003. “Solar Photocatalytic Degradation of Azo Dye: Comparison of Photocatalytic Efficiency
of ZnO and TiO2.” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 77: 65–82.
Saquib, M., and M. Muneer. 2002. “Semiconductor Mediated Photocatalysed Degradation of an
Anthraquinone Dye, Remazol Brilliant Blue R under Sunlight and Artificial Light Source.”
Dyes and Pigments 53: 237–249.
Shu, H. Y., and M.C. Chang. 2005. “Decolorizationeffects of Six Azo Dyes by O3, UV/O3 and UV/
H2O2.” Dyes and Pigments 65: 25–31.
€
S€okmen, M., and A. Ozkan. 2002. “Decolourising Textile Wastewater with Modified Titania: The
Effects of Inorganic Anions on the Photocatalysis.” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiol-
ogy A 147: 77–81.
16 H. Trabelsi et al.
Tam, N.F.Y., and S.M.Tiquia. 1994. “Assessing Toxicity of Spent Sawdust Pig-litter’ Using Seed
Germination Technique.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 11:261–274.
Tamer, E., Z. Hamid, A.M. Aly, E.T. Ossama, M. Bo, and G. Benoit. 2006. “Sequential UV–
Biological Degradation of Chlorophenols.” Chemosphere 63: 277–284.
Tanaka, K., K. Padermpole and T. Hisanaga. 2000. “Photocatalytic Degradation of Commercial
Azo Dyes.” Water Research 34: 327–333.
Tiquia, S.M., N.F.Y. Tam, and I.J. Hodgkiss. 1996. “Effects of Composting on Phytotoxicity of
Spent Pig-manure Sawdust Litter.” Environmental Pollution 93: 249–256.
Wang, X., C. Sun, S. Gao, L. Wang, and H. Shuokui. 2001. “Validation of Germination Rate and
Root Elongation as Indicator to Assess Phytotoxicity with Cucumissativus.” Chemosphere 44:
1711–1721.
Wrobel, D., A. Boguta, and R.M. Ion. 2001. “Mixtures of Synthetic Organic Dyes in a Photoelectro-
chemical cell.” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A 138: 7–22.