Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that in the last decade foreign tourism has increased rapidly and dramatically as a
consequence of globalization. While some people tend towards the viewpoint that overseas
travelers are obligated to remunerate more than domestic people for going to places of
interest. I would have to support that this idea is completely unconscionable.

In the first place, when a person travels to another country, he not only spends his money in
important attractions. In contrast to this, a regular sightseer stumps up his capital on food,
accommodation, transportation, and activities. As a piece of evidence, is our daily life, we do
not drop all our cash in one single necessity. In this way, it is crucial to know how to use our
money while we are on a trip.

In second place, if the price of tourist attractions rise, visitors would not return and even
worse, they would not recommend that place; meaning that in the future there would not be
any tourists. In other words, people would choose to visit another destination and the
economy of the country would drop sharply. To illustrate, in case a country will apply this
measure, the national economy would be hit because, tourisms represent a huge portion of
the economy.

In short, it seems to me that this method would be counterproductive apart from the fact that
it would harm the economy, it also hurts the budget that a person has for a trip.