You are on page 1of 4

Camarena 1

Diego Camarena-Torres

Miss Williams-Arnold

English Language Arts II (Gr 10) Honors

24 October 2020

Color Key:

Light Blue - Compound Sentence

Light Pink - Complex Sentence

Yellow - Compound-Complex Sentence

Conjunctive Adverb - (bold, and underlined)

Abyss of People

When one is in the position of power they have the freedom to do as they please, but

what happens when that power slowly starts to fade away? In “Shooting An Elephant” George

Orwell states, “when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys,” and “He

wears a mask, and his face grows to fit”. These two statements can be open for interpretation, but

they are both connected to the same concept of deception. Self-deception is a harsh reality that

most will not admit to. Oftentimes people are forced into making themselves believe a certain

way even if they do not agree with what is being presented. My interpretation of Orwell’s quotes

is that when someone decides to follow the flow of their surroundings, they take away their

freedom to make their own decisions. By fitting in with the majority you effectively disappear

into the ocean of others. When you are talking by yourself in an empty room your voice is

amplified and you can hear yourself clearly, but as you start adding more people your voice

disappears. I agree with Orwells thinking because, when a person decides to go against their
Camarena 2

beliefs and notions they lose their freedom as they are losing themselves, and humans can be

very dependent on others' opinions and thoughts.

One's beliefs and thoughts make up who they are as a person, so by going against the

foundation of who you are as a person you deprive yourself of freedom. Despite Orwells hatred

for imperialism, he still put on a mask for the British, “Theoretically – and secretly, of course – I

was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British” (Paragraph 2) . This

statement highlights the fact that Orwells freedom was being taken away as a British officer. He

hated his job, but he had to put on an act to keep his position. If you didn't conform to society's

norms and expectations you wouldn’t be able to survive in the environment where imperialism is

present. Imperialism effectively takes away people’s power and freedom, so if you choose to not

give up your power and freedom you end up in a situation where the oppressors and the

oppressed are against you. Orwell had to choose the side of the British for society, since he was a

British officer, even if his actual views countered that. As soon as he received the call of an

elephant “ravaging” the bazaar, Orwell knew the Burmese were exaggerating and he had already

made up his mind that he would not shoot the elephant; however, the large crowd made him

rethink his plan. With the crowd growing bigger as he walked to the elephant, Orwell had to go

against his will and shoot the elephant. When under pressure it is easy to make a wrong decision,

so with an ever growing crowd Orwell panicked and made a decision causing him to go against

his own morals. If he would’ve decided to not shoot the elephant it would give the Burmese

another reason to hate him, and Orwell thought it to be “impossible” to “ come all that way, rifle

in hand, with two thousand people marching at my heels, and then to trail feebly away”. So by

going against his will and shooting the elephant, Orwell becomes a puppet of the people and
Camarena 3

effectively destroys his own freedom. The Burmese took his power and now controlled him like

a puppet. If he didn't hold to their expectations they would make a fool out of him, and that was

the last thing Orwell wanted.

Another factor that pins people to the wall is their dependency on the opinion of society.

It can be inferred that Orwell cared about the public's opinion a lot considering he shot the

elephant “solely to avoid looking a fool.” (Paragraph 14). After the crowd started growing he felt

the pressure of the crowd and rather than sticking to his initial plan, he succumbed to the

expectations of the crowd. When he decides to shoot the elephant, he wears a mask and soon

starts to fit it. He is no longer himself, but rather the majority. Some may think that when you

turn tyrant that is the point where you get your freedom by showing your true character, but

truthfully that is the point where you lose yourself. You went from being a leader to following

others orders without a choice. The crowd got under his skin and made him their puppet, which

took away his power and freedom instantly. In this situation Orwell represents imperialism,

while the elephant represents the victims of imperialism, and the crowd was a representation of

the general public. Orwell becomes the imperialist and shoots the innocent victim for the general

public. He cared too much about the opinion of others that he had to shoot the elephant, in order

to fit in with the general public. He had to shoot the elephant, for he wanted to avoid looking

foolish. Europeans were arguing whether it was the right decision to shoot the elephant for

killing a coolie, but none of them realized that the only reason why he did it was to avoid looking

foolish. Everyone is so deep into the concept of imperialism that they don’t view the situation

from differing points of views. Some Burmese might’ve not agreed with a lot of the Burmeses'

thoughts but they couldn’t say anything because as established before, imperialism causes people
Camarena 4

to lose their voice. Some Burmese may not like the way other Burmese think, but they cannot

say anything due to the driving force of coercion.

Overall, when one decides to go against their will and yield to the majority they lose their

power and freedom. They no longer make their own decisions because they joined everyone else.

The freedom they once had vanished, simply because they wanted to “put on a mask” and please

the general public. So when Orwell decided to shoot the elephant to please the Burmese he

destroyed his freedom. If he had not shot the elephant, yes he would’ve looked foolish, but he

would’ve still had his freedom and power. This led Orwell to take part in what he hated most:

imperialism. All in all, I agree with what Orwell said because when you go against your beliefs

and succumb to the expectations of others, you are no longer in charge because you let others

influence and control how you think, like a puppet. After a while of wearing that mask, you get

used to it and soon adapt to fit the mask. It is no longer a mask but it is who you are as a person.

You might also like