Year: 2018

Semester: IV

1. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
2. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
3. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
4. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
COURSE PLAN
Target 50% (marks)
Level-1 40% (population)
Level-2 50% (population)
Level-3 60% (population)

1. Method of Evaluation

UG PG
Quizzes/Tests, Assignments (30%) Quizzes/Tests, Assignments, seminar (50%)
Mid Examination (20%) End semester (50%)
End examination (50%)

2. Passing Criteria

Scale PG UG
Out of 10 point scale SGPA – “6.00” in each semester SGPA – “5.0” in each semester
CGPA – “6.00” CGPA – “5.0”
Min. Individual Course Grade  –  “C” Min. Individual Course Grade  –  “C”
Course Grade  Point –  “4.0” Course Grade  Point –  “4.0”

*for PG, passing marks are 40/100 in a paper

*for UG, passing marks are 35/100 in a paper

3. Pedagogy

 Presentations (Paper/Group Project)

 Case Study
 Group Projects (may include practical assignments)
 Chalk and talk
 Random Questioning
 Reflections
 Case Analysis

4. References:
Text Books Web resources Journals Reference books
The Constitution of JSTOR Journal of Indian H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India
India- Bare Act Law Institute (4th ed., Vol 1 (1991), Vol. 2 (1993),
M.P. Jain, Indian EPW Vol.3 (1996)
Constitutional Law Indian Bar Review
(5th ed., 2003) SCC Online D.D. Basu, Shorter Constitution of India
Mahendra P. Singh, V. Journal of (14th ed., 2009)
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

1. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
2. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
3. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
4. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
N. Shukla’s Westlaw Constitutional Law
Constitution of India & Parliamentary V.D. Sebastian, Indian Federalism the
(11th ed., 2008) Affairs Legislative Conflicts (1985).

The Indian Journal of R.K. Chaubey, Federalism, Autonomy and

Constitutional Law Centre-State Relations, Satyam Books,
Delhi, 2007.

Shiva Rao, The Framing of India’s

Constitution – Select Documents (1967)

Granville Austin, Indian Constitution:

Corner stone of the nation (1966)

Granville Austin, Working a Democratic

Constitution - A History of the Indian
Experience (1999)

G. Noorani, “Constitutional Questions in

India- The President, Parliament and the
States”, 6th Impression 2013.

Sudhir Krishnaswamy, Democracy and

Constitutionalism in India- A Study of the
Basic Structure Doctrine, 3rd Impression,
2012, 1-229

GUIDELINES TO STUDY THE SUBJECT

Instructions to Students:

1. Go through the 'Syllabus' in the Black Board section of the web-site(https://learn.upes.ac.in) in

order to find out the Reading List.
2. Get your schedule and try to pace your studies as close to the timeline as possible.
3. Get your on-line lecture notes (Content, videos) at Lecture Notes section.  These are our lecture
notes. Make sure you use them during this course.
4. Check your blackboard regularly
5. Go through study material
6. Check mails and announcements on blackboard
7. Keep updated with the posts, assignments and examinations which shall be conducted on the
blackboard
8. Be regular, so that you do not suffer in any way
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

1. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
2. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
3. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
4. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
9. Cell Phones and other Electronic Communication Devices: Cell phones and other electronic
communication devices (such as Blackberries/Laptops) are not permitted in classes during Tests or
the Mid/Final Examination. Such devices MUST be turned off in the class room.
10. E-Mail and online learning tool: Each student in the class should have an e-mail id and a pass
word to access the LMS system regularly. Regularly, important information – Date of conducting
class tests, guest lectures, via online learning tool. The best way to arrange meetings with us or ask
specific questions is by email and prior appointment. All the assignments preferably should be
uploaded on online learning tool. Various research papers/reference material will be
mailed/uploaded on online learning platform time to time.
11. Attendance: Students are required to have minimum attendance of 75% in each subject. Students
with less than said percentage shall NOT be allowed to appear in the end semester examination.

This much should be enough to get you organized and on your way to having a great semester! If you need
us for anything, send your feedback through e-mail mmanzoor@ddn.upes.ac.in. Please use an appropriate
subject line to indicate your message details.

There will no doubt be many more activities in the coming weeks. So, to keep up to date with all the latest
developments, please keep visiting this website regularly.
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

5. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
6. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
7. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
8. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
RELATED OUTCOMES
1. The expected outcomes of the Program are:

PO1 Students will demonstrate conceptual knowledge in core areas of law.

PO2 Students will effectively apply their learnings to practical legal issues.

PO3 Students will be able to exhibit effective law professional skills, employing oral
and written communication, legal research, analysis, rationalization and critical-
thinking.

PO4 Students will demonstrate ability to evolve alternative solutions from dynamic
socio-economic and techno-legal perspectives.

PO5 Students will demonstrate desirable qualities to be employable in the relevant

market

PO6 Students will show sensitivity towards ethical, moral and social issues arising in
their professional career

PO7 Students will exhibit commitment, teambuilding, networking, leadership and

lifelong learning skills to excel in legal world

2. The expected outcomes of the Specific Program are: (upto3)

PSO1 Students will be able to demonstrate conceptual knowledge in core areas of

business administration.
PSO2 Students will be able to demonstrate integrated knowledge of legal principles and
business administration
PSO3 Students will be able to exhibit skills in practices and procedures of corporate
Law.
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

5. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
6. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
7. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
8. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
3. The expected outcomes of the Course are: (minimum 3 and maximum 6)

CO 1 Explain the salient features and importance of constitutional bodies, functionaries and institutions.

CO 2 Discuss the working of Judiciary, Executive and Legislature.

CO 3 Examine the cases in light of the constitutional provisions discussed above.

4. Co-Relationship Matrix
Indicate the relationships by1- Slight (low) 2- Moderate (Medium) 3-Substantial (high)

Program
Outcom
es
PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PSO PSO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2
Course 3
Outcom
es
CO 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 - 1 -

CO 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 - 1 -

CO 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 - 1 -

Average 2.6 2 1 1 2 2 2 - 1 -

5. Course outcomes assessment plan:

components

Course Assignment Test/Quiz Mid Semester End Semester Any other

Outcomes

CO 1     
CO 2     

CO 3    

BROAD PLAN OF COURSE COVERAGE

Course Activities:
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

5. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
6. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
7. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
8. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
Planned
S. No. Description No. of Remarks
From To
Sessions

MODULE I
1. THE EXECUTIVE AND THE 1 15 15
LEGISLATURE

MODULE II
THE JUDICIARY, THE
LOCAL SELF
2. GOVERNMENT AND 16 34 19
CONSTITUTIONAL
FUNCTIONARIES AND
BODIES
MODULE III
ANTI- FEDERAL FEATURES
3. 35 51 17
OF THE INDIAN
CONSTITUTION
MODULE IV

4. EMERGENCY & 52 60 9
AMENDMENT

Sessions: Total No. of Instructional periods available for the course

 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4

SESSION PLAN
UNIT-I: THE EXECUTIVE AND THE LEGISLATURE

Lectur Delivery
e No. Topics to be Covered Mode CO Mapped

Synchronous
1.  Extent of the Executive Power  CO 2
Synchronous

2. Extent of the Executive Power CO 2

 The President Synchronous
CASES:
 Ram Jawaya Kapoor v. State of Punjab AIR 1955 SC 549
 N. B. Khare v. Election Commissioner of India AIR 1958
SC 139
 Maru Ram v Union of India AIR 1980 SC 2147
 Re Presidential Elections AIR 1974 SC 1982
 Rameshwar Prasad v Union of India AIR 2006 SC 980
 Epuru Sudhakar v. Govt. of A.P., AIR 2006 SC 3385
 State of Haryana v Jagdish AIR 2010 SCW 2178, 2188-89
3.  CO 3

Asynchronou
The Vice President- s
4.  CO 2
Synchronous

Governor- Prime Minister and Council of Ministers-

5. CO 2
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
Synchronous

Governor- Prime Minister and Council of Ministers-

6. CO 2
Synchronous
 Civil Servants-Doctrine of Pleasure
(Arts. 74,75,77,78,111, 102, 103 (2), 163, 217 (3), 307-311)
7.  CO 2
  THE LEGISLATURE Asynchronou
Parliament and State Legislatures s
Composition
8.  CO 2
THE LEGISLATURE Synchronous
Parliament and State Legislatures
Composition
9. CO 2
Qualification/Disqualification of Members – Synchronous
Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament/ State
Legislative members –
Parliamentary Privilege and Fundamental Rights
10. CO 2
Qualification/Disqualification of Members – Synchronous
Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament/ State
Legislative members –
Parliamentary Privilege and Fundamental Rights
11. CO 2
 Discussion on the following cases: Asynchronou
 M.S.M. Sharma v Shree Krishna Sinha AIR 1960 SC 1186 s
 In re Keshav Singh AIR 1965 SC 745
 P.V. Narasimha Rao v State AIR 1998 SC 2120
 Raja Ram Pal v Hon’ble Speaker, Lok Sabha (2007) 3
SCC 184
 Shibu Soren v Dayanand Sahay (2001)7 SCC 4251
 Jaya Bachchan v Union of India AIR 2006 SC 2119
 Amar Singh v Union of India AIR 2011 SCW 499, 503-4
12.  CO 3
Synchronous
Bills- Types, Procedure, Differences between bills (Arts.105,
13. 194)
CO 2
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
Synchronous
Bills- Types, Procedure, Differences between bills (Arts.105,
194)
14. CO 2
Synchronous
Bills- Types, Procedure, Differences between bills (Arts.105,
194)
15. CO 2

SESSION PLAN
UNIT-II: THE JUDICIARY, THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT
AND
CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES AND BODIES

Lecture CO
No. Topics to be Covered Mapped
Asynch
 Union Judiciary‐ Supreme Court of India (Arts. 124-147)- ronous
16. Composition, Appointment and Removal of judges of the Supreme
Court;  CO 2
Synchro
Union Judiciary‐ Supreme Court of India (Arts. 124-147)- nous
Composition, Appointment and Removal of judges of the Supreme
17. Court; CO 2
Synchro
 State judiciary‐High Court in the States- nous
NJAC-Collegium System vs. National Judicial Appointment
18. Commission CO 2 
Synchro
State judiciary‐High Court in the States- nous
NJAC-Collegium System vs. National Judicial Appointment
19. Commission CO 2
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
 CASES: Asynch
 S. P. Gupta v. Union of India-Judges Transfer Case AIR 1982 ronous
SC 149
 S. C. Advocate on Record Association v. Union of India (1993)
4 SCC 441
 Re Presidential Reference AIR 1999 SC 1
 Suraz India Trust v Union of India 2011 AIR SCW 2680
 Justice P. D. Dinakaran v Judges Inquiry Committee AIR 2011
SC 3777
 Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Another
vs. Union of India 2015 SCC OnLine SC 376
20.  CO 3
Synchro
 Jurisdiction of Supreme Court & High Court- Original Jurisdiction nous
& Extra ordinary Original Jurisdiction
21.  CO 2
Synchro
 Jurisdiction of Supreme Court & High Court- Original Jurisdiction nous
& Extra ordinary Original Jurisdiction
22. CO 2
 CASES: Synchro
 State of West Bengal v Union of India AIR 1963 SC 1241 nous
 State of Bihar v Union of India AIR 1970 SC 1446
 Union of India v State of Rajasthan AIR 1984 SC 1675
 M/s. Tashi Delek Gaming Solutions Ltd. v State of Karnataka
AIR 2006 SC 661
23.  CO 3
 Appellate jurisdiction, Statutory Appeal Asynch
CASES: ronous
 Krishnaswami Pillai v Governor General in Council AIR 1947  CO 2
PC 37 &
24. CO 3
Special Leave to Appeal Synchro
CASES: nous
 Keshav Prasad Sharma v Indian Oil Corporation, 2011 AIR
SCW 999
 Ramakant Rai v Madan Rai AIR 2004 SC 77
 Kunhayammad v State of Kerala AIR 2000 SC 2587
25. CO 3
26. Court of Record, Doctrine of Stare Decisis, Synchro CO 3
CASES: nous
 Swaran Singh Lamba v Union of India (1995)4 SCC 545
 Ajit Kumar Rath v State of Orissa AIR 2000 SC 85
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
 Subhadra Rani Choudhary v S. W. Nain AIR 2005 SC 3011
 Vinita Saxena v Pankaj Pande AIR 2006 SC 1662
 State of U.P v Punni AIR 2008 SC 930
 Special Deputy Collector v N. Basudeva Rao AIR 2008 SC 944
 Safia Bee v Mohd. Vajahath Hussain AIR 2011 SC 421, 426
Rohtas Bhankhar v. Union of India, Civil Appeal Nos. 6046-
6047 of 2004, 15-07-2014

Curative Petition- Advisory Jurisdiction- Writs (Arts. 32 & 226),- Synchro

Power of Review, Judicial Review, Judicial Activism and Judicial nous
Accountability-
CASES:
 Keshavanand Bharati v. State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461
 Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra (2002) 4 SCC 388 : AIR
2002 SC 1771 CO 2
27. & CO 3
29. IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES Asynch
& BODIES ronous
Attorney and Advocate General-
Comptroller and Auditor General-
 Hemchandra Sen Gupta v. The Speaker, 1956 cal 378)
 Chote Lal v. State of U.P 1951 All.258
 M.S.M Sharma v. Sri Krishna Singh 1966 SC 1186
 Sri Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain 1975 SC 2299
 Association of United Tele Services Providers Vs Union of
India 2014 SC 1984 at p. 1999
CO 1 &
28. CO 3
IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES & Synchro
BODIES nous
Attorney and Advocate General- CO 1 &
30. CO 3
Synchro
Public Service Commission- nous
Election Commission-
31. CO 1
Synchro
Public Service Commission- nous
Election Commission-
32. CO 1
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
Asynch
Finance Commission- ronous
Inter- State Council
33. CO 1
Synchro
Finance Commission- nous
Inter- State Council
34.

SESSION PLAN
UNIT-III: LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND
STATES

Lectu
re
No. Topics to be Covered CO Mapped
  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNION AND Synchronous
THE STATES
Legislative Relations (Arts 245‐ 254) –
3 Different Lists and the allocation of subjects-
5 Doctrines and principles of interpretation –
.  CO 1
 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNION AND Synchronous
THE STATES
3 Legislative Relations (Arts 245‐ 254) –
6 Different Lists and the allocation of subjects-
.  Doctrines and principles of interpretation CO 1
3  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNION AND Asynchronous CO 1
7 THE STATES
. Legislative Relations (Arts 245‐ 254) –
Different Lists and the allocation of subjects-
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
 Doctrines and principles of interpretation
 Doctrine of territorial nexus [extent of legislative powers] Synchronous
CASES:
 Wallace Brothers & Co. Ltd. v Income Tax
3 Commissioner AIR 1948 PC 118
8  State of Bombay v. R. M. D. C., AIR 1957 SC 699
.  CO 3
 Delegatus non potest deligare [extent of legislative powers] Synchronous
–
CASES:
 Re Delhi Laws Act 1912 AIR 1951 SC 332
 Hari Shankar Bagle v State of M.P AIR 1954 SC 465
 Hamdard Dawakhana v Union of India AIR 1960 SC
3 554
9  Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v Union of India AIR
. 2009 SC 792
 CO 3
 Distribution of Legislative powers [245-253] Synchronous

Doctrine of Repugnancy –
Conflict between laws made by Parliament and State
4 Legislatures- Art. 254
0
.  CO 1

 Judicial Interpretations: Synchronous

Colourable legislation[extent of legislative powers]
CASES:
 K.T. Moopil Nair v State of Kerala AIR 1961 SC 552
 S. P. Industries Co. Ltd. v Electricity Inspector and
4 E.T.I.O AIR 2007 SC 1984
1
.  CO 3
Synchronous
4 Judicial Interpretations:
2 Colourable legislation[extent of legislative powers]
. C0 3
4 Ancillary and incidental power [interpretation of subjects Synchronous CO 3
3 of legislation]-
. CASES:
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
Check Post Officer v K. P. Abdulla & Brothers AIR 1971
SC 792
 Doctrine of Pith and Substance [interpretation of subjects Asynchronous
of legislation] –
CASES:
 Prafulla Kumar v. Bank of Commerce AIR 1947 PC 60
 State of Bombay v F. N. Balsara AIR 1951 SC 318
4  Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Sheikh v State of
4 Maharashtra 2010 AIR SCW 3450  CO 1 &
. CO 3
Doctrine of Harmonious Construction [interpretation of Synchronous
subjects of legislation]-
CASES:
4  Sanjeev Lal v. Income Tax, Civil Appeal Nos. 5899-
5 5900 of 2014, 01-07-2014
.  O. N. Mohindroo v Bar Council AIR 1968 SC 888 CO 1
Doctrine of Harmonious Construction [interpretation of Synchronous
subjects of legislation]-
CASES:
 Sanjeev Lal v. Income Tax, Civil Appeal Nos. 5899-
4 5900 of 2014, 01-07-2014
6 CO 1
Administrative Relation (Arts 256‐262) Synchronous
CASES:
 Jayantilal Amritlal Shodhan v. F. N. Rana & Others AIR
1964 SC 648
 State of Bihar v. Union of India AIR 1970 SC 1446
4  State of Karnataka v. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 68
7 CO 3
Synchronous

4
8
Financial Relation (Arts. 264‐267) Synchronous
CASES:
 K. T. Moopil v. State of Kerala AIR 1961 SC 552
4 Builders Association of India v. Union of India AIR 1989 SC
9 1371 CO 3
EMERGENCY: Synchronous
Meaning and Scope- Different forms of Emergency-
5 National, State and Financial
0 CO 1
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
Proclamation of emergency – Conditions Asynchronous
CASES:
 Bijayanand Patnaik & others v President of India and
others AIR 1974 Ori 52
 State of Rajasthan v. Union of India AIR 1977 SC 1361
 S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) 3 SCC 1
5  Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006) 2 SCC 1
1 CO 1 & 3

SESSION PLAN
UNIT-IV
Lectu Delivery CO
re Mode Mappe
No. Topics to be Covered d
 Effects of Emergency on Centre- State Relations- Isn’t it against the Synchron
concept of Federalism? ous
Emergency and Suspension of Fundamental Rights
CASES:
 Makhan Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1964 SC 381  CO
5  A. D. M. Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla AIR 1976 SC 1207 1&
2  Attorney General v Amrit Lal Pranjivandas AIR 1994 SC 2179 3
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
  FREEDOM OF TRADE, COMMERCE AND INTER‐ Synchron
COURSE: ous
Meaning- Trade, Commerce, Intercourse
CASES:
 M/s B. R. Enterprises v State of U. P., AIR 1999 SC 1867
5  Bimalendu De v. union of India AIR 2001 Cal. 30  CO 1
3 &3
 Relation between Part III & Part XIII – Arts. 19 and 14 Synchron
CASES: ous
5  State of Bombay v R. M. D. C AIR 1957 SC 699  CO 2
4 &3
 Arts. 301‐307- Freedom of Trade- Not Absolute Asynchro
CASES: nous
 Atiabari Tea CO. Ltd. V. State of Assam AIR 1961 SC 232
 Automobile Transport v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1962 SC 1406  CO 1
5  Khyerbari Tea Company v State of Assam AIR 1964 & 2&
5 Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. State of Haryana, AIR 2006 SC 2550 3
  AMENDMENT Synchron
Power of Parliament and its Restrictions- Methods of Constitutional ous
5 Amendment  CO2
6 &3
 Limitations upon Constituent Power-Development of the Basic Synchron
Structure Doctrine- ous
Important Constitutional Amendments
CASES:
 Shankari Prasad v. Union of India AIR 1951 SC 455
 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1965 SC 845
 C. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab AIR 1967 SC 1643
 Keshavanand Bharati v. State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461
 Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain AIR 1975 SC 2299
 Minerva Mills v. Union of India AIR 1980 SC 1789
5  Waman Rao v. Union of India AIR 1981 SC 271  CO 2
7 &3
Judicial Activism and Restraint- Judicial Review of Legislations Synchron
included in the Ninth Schedule- ous
5 CASES: CO 2
8 I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2007 SC 8617 &3
Judicial Activism and Restraint- Judicial Review of Legislations Asynchro
included in the Ninth Schedule- nous
5 CASES: CO 2
9 I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2007 SC 8617 &3
 Year: 2018
Semester: IV

9. Name of the Faculty: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI Course Code:

CLCC 2005
10. Course : Constitutional Law II L: 4
11. Program : BBA LLB CL 2018 T: 1
12. Target : 50% P: 0
C: 4
Judicial Activism and Restraint- Judicial Review of Legislations Synchron
included in the Ninth Schedule- ous
6 CASES: CO 2
0 I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2007 SC 8617 &3