Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Question 2: In any of the above cases do you think production cost should also be considered?
global optimization (production cost + transportation cost) if supply>demand, production cost should be con
c d
a
b
dummy
dummy cost wil have effect on transportation cost
solving in excel wouldn't make a difference
if supply<demand, high cost of dummy reduces no. of iterations
winston
Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$D$22 Toronto Toronto 1000 0 0.75 2.5 0.75
$E$22 Toronto Denver 0 0.75 2.5 1E+030 0.75
$F$22 Toronto L.A. 0 1.75 4.5 1E+030 1.75
$G$22 Toronto Seattle 0 3.5 4.75 1E+030 3.5
$H$22 Toronto Chicago 1500 0 1.5 0.75 1.5
$I$22 Toronto Atlanta 0 0 3 0.75 0.5
$J$22 Toronto Guadalajara 0 1.25 5.25 1E+030 1.25
$D$23 Denver Toronto 0 2.5 2.5 1E+030 2.5
$E$23 Denver Denver 750 0 1 0.75 1.75
$F$23 Denver L.A. 0 0.5 2.5 1E+030 0.5
$G$23 Denver Seattle 0 2.25 2.75 1E+030 2.25
$H$23 Denver Chicago 0 0.75 1.5 1E+030 0.75
$I$23 Denver Atlanta 750 0 2.25 0.5 0.75
$J$23 Denver Guadalajara 0 0 3.25 0.5 0.5
$D$24 Los Angeles Toronto 0 6 4.5 1E+030 6
$E$24 Los Angeles Denver 0 3 2.5 1E+030 3
$F$24 Los Angeles L.A. 1500 0 0.5 0.5 0.25
$G$24 Los Angeles Seattle 0 3.25 2.25 1E+030 3.25
$H$24 Los Angeles Chicago 0 4.5 3.75 1E+030 4.5
$I$24 Los Angeles Atlanta 0 2.25 3 1E+030 2.25
$J$24 Los Angeles Guadalajara 2000 0 1.75 0.25 0.5
$D$25 Seattle Toronto 0 4.5 4.75 1E+030 4.5
$E$25 Seattle Denver 0 1.5 2.75 1E+030 1.5
$F$25 Seattle L.A. 1000 0 2.25 0.25 2.25
$G$25 Seattle Seattle 1500 0 0.75 2.25 1.25
$H$25 Seattle Chicago 0 1.5 2.5 1E+030 1.5
$I$25 Seattle Atlanta 0 1 3.5 1E+030 1
$J$25 Seattle Guadalajara 0 0.25 3.75 1E+030 0.25
Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$D$26 Toronto 1000 0.75 1000 0 1000
$E$26 Denver 750 1.75 750 0 0
$F$26 L.A. 2500 2.75 2500 0 0
$G$26 Seattle 1500 1.25 1500 0 0
$H$26 Chicago 1500 1.5 1500 0 1500
$I$26 Atlanta 750 3 750 0 0
$J$26 Guadalajara 2000 4 2000 0 0
$K$22 Toronto 2500 0 2500 1E+030 0
$K$23 Denver 1500 -0.75 1500 0 0
$K$24 Los Angeles 3500 -2.25 3500 0 0
$K$25 Seattle 2500 -0.5 2500 0 0
how much can the objective coefficient increase or decrease without changing the opti
ease without changing the optimal solution
Centers Toronto Denver L.A. Seattle Chicago Atlanta
Toronto 0.75 2.5 4.5 4.75 1.5 3
Denver 2.5 1 2.5 2.75 1.5 2.25
L.A. 4.5 2.5 0.5 2.25 3.75 3
Seattle 4.75 2.75 2.25 0.75 2.5 3.5
Guadalajara 5.25 3.25 1.75 2.5 3.75 3.5
5-Yr. 1000 750 2500 1500 1500 750
10-Yr. 1000 1000 3000 2000 2000 1000
13062.25
Guadalajara
0 2500
1 1501
1999 3500
0 2499
2000
Daily Capacity per Carton
2,500
1,501
3,500
2,500
4,000