Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction: the speed is adjusted so that the operating point moves from
the fixed speed operation line (A→B) to the path with better
Power systems are designed to operate under strong quality efficiency in the hill chart. Therefore in hydroelectric plants
requirements, so that hydroelectric plants have to produce the most correct term to be used should be adjustable speed
energy with constant voltage and frequency. According to constant frequency (ASCF) energy generation, instead of
classical generation schemes, frequency is controlled by the variable speed operation.
speed governors, which tend to maintain the turbine rotating
speed fixed at a synchronous speed.
During the plant life the basic variables, such as water head
and flow, are not the same as those assumed for the design,
the turbine’s operating point can go out of the region for
maximal efficiency for long periods of time, decreasing the
plant total efficiency. If speed is changed, the power plant can
operate again with maximum efficiency, bringing also many
advantages for the electrical power system control.
When the mechanical speed is confined to a relative small
band around synchronism (typically ± 10%) the use of
doubly-fed induction machines (DFIM) comes into
consideration and the static converter is sized only for a
portion of the rated power of the plant. In pumped storage
power plants the use of doubly-fed induction machines allows
the realization of power control in pump mode and efficiency
optimization in turbine mode. Due to reduced costs of the
converter this solution seems to be the most suitable one. In
this article the fundamentals of the DFIM and the evolution of Figure 1 – Hill chart of a Francis turbine showing the most
the machine/converter systems will be presented. Another efficient path for adjustable speed operation
important aspect in DFIM/converter systems is how to define
the dimension of the converter referring to the rated power of
the machine. At the end there will be presented a comparison 3. Historical retrospect:
between the most common ASCF energy generation
technologies and the advantages of the DFIM adjustable The first studies of machine cascade connections and speed
speed system. control with cascaded commutator machines were reported in
the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century 1. The
first register containing asynchronous machines with a three
2. Terminology: phase cascaded commutator machine is the english patent
13033 by Lydall and Siemens Brothers, 1901. They were the
In literature the name “variable speed energy generation” is firsts who presented such machine schemes, but these cascade
often used to indicate that the electrical generator is not connections didn’t receive their names. Do to practical
working at synchronous speed. However, the name “variable” applications and studies done by Kraemer and Scherbius
suggests that the speed is varying free, without control,
probably containing oscillations, in a defined speed range.
1
This definition may not be applied for hydroelectric plants Görges (ETZ, 1891);
such as for wind energy generation, where the wind speed can Siemens & Halske (DRP 109 208, 1898);
not be controlled. In case of hydroelectric plants the rotating Bragstadt – LaCour (DRP 148 305, 1902);
speed of the generator/turbine system is not varying without Osnos (ETZ, 1902);
rules, but is adjusted so that the turbine operates with Westinghouse – Leblanc (french patent 329 154, 1903);
maximum efficiency for a defined operating point. Figure 1 Milch (DRP 191 859, 1906);
shows a hill chart of a Francis turbine. For a demanded power BBC – Pungs (DRP 241 188, 1910)
between 1907 and 1913 this cascade connections became back to the line, such as the in the historical retrospect
more popular and are therefore known nowadays as Kraemer mentioned Sherbius System. This scheme is therefore known
and Scherbius systems. These systems are both slip power as Static Scherbius Drive (figure 3). The advantages of this
recovery schemes of wound-rotor induction machines. The scheme are the low converter power rating, because the
Kraemer System transforms the slip energy back into converter handles only the slip power, and the continuous
mechanical energy using a second machine in a tandem speed control. The problems are the limited two quadrant
arrangement with the wound-rotor induction motor. The operation and the low power factor due to the use of a
Scherbius System recovers the slip energy by sending it back thyristor inverter as line side converter. By using a diode
to the line using an induction generator connected bridge for the rotor side converter the slip power can just flow
mechanically to the commutator machine. in one direction and the machine can only operate as a motor
Before the 2nd world war Prof. A. Leonhard made one of the with undersynchronous speed or as a generator with
most complete analysis at this time of the doubly-fed oversynchronous speed.
induction machine as a variable speed generator [6]. He was
after the war professor by the Technical University of
Stuttgart and his assistant developed in 1966 the principles of
the control scheme for a DFIM using a special developed
cascaded machine [7].
Important evolutions in theory and technology occurred in the
last decades [8]. In the 60th the space vectors theory, in the
70th the field orientation theory and in the 80th and 90th the
evolution of power electronics and digital signal processing
with controlled AC-Drives. Due to work pioneered by Prof.
W. Leonhard in the 70th and 80th the technology of doubly-fed
induction machines as an adjustable speed constant frequency
energy generation system is now possible.
di S
u S = R S i S + LS
dt
+ L0
d
dt
(
i R e jε ) (eq.1)
di R
Figure 6 – ASCF Energy Generation Drive with PWM u R = R R iR + LR
dt
+ L0
d
dt
(
i Se - jε ) (eq.2)
converter
dω 2
5. The power flow in the doubly-fed induction machine:
Θ = m el − m w = L 0 Im{i S i R e jε } − m w (eq.3)
dt 3
Figure 7 shows the power flow in the doubly fed machine in
four operation modes, motor and generator in over and dε
=ω (eq.4)
undersynchronous speed. PN is the power to/from the line, PS dt
the power through the stator, PR the power through the rotor
(slip power), PW the power trough the converter (PR = PW by As shown in [1] the doubly-fed induction machine
considering an ideal converter), PMECH the mechanical power mathematical model can be expressed in a stator-flux oriented
and PLOSS contains the losses in the machine. reference frame by the equations eq.5 till eq.10.
For the stator circuit: The slip (ωms – ω) and the magnetizing current ims in the q –
axis component build the largest part of the rotor voltage.
di ms R S 1 R Discarding the other terms in equation eq.12 the rotor voltage
+ i ms = u Sd + S i Rd (eq.5) can be represented as a linear function of the slip and so we
dt LS L0 LS reach the simplification mentioned above. The results are
quite different if the other voltage components are not
1 RS neglected. To show this difference the total rotor voltage is
ω ms = u Sq + i Rq (eq.6) defined in equation eq.13.
L 0 i ms L 0 i ms
2 2
dμ U R = u Rd + u Rq (eq.13)
= ω ms (eq.7)
dt
Considering the machine operating as a motor consuming
rated active power PS0 and changing the consumed/generated
dω - 3L 0
Θ = m el − m w = i Rq i ms − m w (eq.8) reactive power QS0 the result is plotted in figure 8. Negative
dt (1 + σ S ) values for QS0 represent reactive power generation.
di Rd R R
+ i Rd =
dt LR σ
(eq.9)
1 (1 − σ) di ms
u Rd + (ω ms − ω) i Rq −
LR σ σ dt
di Rq RR
+ i Rq =
dt LR σ
(eq.10)
1 (1 − σ)
u Rq + (ω ms − ω) i Rd − (ω ms − ω) i ms
LR σ σ
7. Dimensioning the rotor side converter: Figure 8 – Total rotor voltage in many operation points.
Machine in motor operation.
In the literature are found many different empirical methods
to calculate the rated power of the converter to be used in the Starting with the plot where Q = QS0 , the machine is
doubly-fed induction machine rotor circuit. The most consuming its rated reactive power from the line. The curve
commons shows that for a speed variation of ±10% around reaches its minimum in undersynchronous speed and is not
synchronous speed the converter is dimensioned for only 10% symmetrical with respect to the synchronous speed due to the
of the machine rated power. This does not agree with the influence of the rotor resistance. Consequently the rotor
values found in constructed power plants, where the converter voltage reaches greater values in 110% than in 90%
power varies between 17% and 18% [10], or can ever reach synchronous speed. This shift tends to disappear in large
30% [11] of the machine rated power. To keep the cost as low machines. Similar to these plots figure 9 shows the converter
as possible the converter power rating has to be determined rated power related to the machine apparent power.
from the machine rotor values such as maximum rotor voltage
and maximum rotor apparent power considering a speed It is possible generate reactive power with the doubly-fed
variation range of ±10% over synchronous speed. induction machine, but this requires an increase of the
converter power rating. If the machine is generating its rated
In steady state the rotor voltage equations (eq.11 – eq.12) reactive power (Q = -QS0) at 110% synchronous speed there is
derived from eq.9 and eq.10 are shown bellow. an increase of the rotor voltages and the converter power can
even reach 16% of the machine rated power. To operate the
system with unity power factor the converter should be
u Rd = R R i Rd − L R σ (ω ms − ω ) i Rq (eq.11) dimensioned for at least 12% machine rated power.
Figure 10 – HVDC & back-to-back systems Figure 12 – Doubly-fed induction machine system
11. Conclusions:
References: