Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IRAWAN PRIMA UTAMA - Outstanding points from their Technical offer Date: 09 Feb 2018
No. Description Action, Outsatanding information required
1 Scope of Work SOW to be submitted with signature in all pages
2 Technical Specification Technical Spec to be submitted with signature
3 Schedule Schedule to be discussed and agreed as per SOW
Submitted schedule is mostly acceptable
4 Preliminary Execution Plan Submitted - OK
5 Manpower Manpower loading schedule to be submitted in
monthly
6 Current Workload Specify total manpower and projects in hand
Justify the manpower for 246 housing project
7 Unpriced BOQ required to be submitted
8 Material List with Lab Test or Certificate required lab test certificate to be submitted for all
materials as per SOW
Engineering Door Panels to be considered as per
SOW, no local made or site made
All materials are to be considered as per SOW
mentioned, no deviation in material
All sample materials to be submitted for getting
approval immediate after placing PO
9 Project list with project acceptance from previous To be submitted with client details with detailed
client. project scope
They are working in OKI for conventional house
construction presently.
10 Project Organization 32 peoples are proposed - OK
1. For PQP, It seems that Bidder take out from other reference which is not fully relevant with this project.
PQP shall be specificly prepared for particular project. Proposed PQP consist of a lot of pages but it does not
reflect implementation of Bidder quality system to the project. Bidder shall revise and improve since there are
some comments such as :
- Check correctness of the statement, eg. On page 1-4, This document is prepared by IPU not GPG, and
some early statement are taken from SOW document which are not relevant (2nd paragraph). On 3rd
paragraph, the statement is confusing since it mentioned GPG role instead of IPU role and responsibility
- Some terms are not applicable to PQP
- Quality objective does not precisely describe the actual need for the project
- No org. chart showing position for handling the project and statement for responsibilities of personnel does
not show the relevancy with the org. chart
- There is other party (Parson) which is not included to this project
- There are some specifications whcih are unknown compared with what GPG has
- Some statement look like "over" such as why there are QC testing and QA testing separately?
- The PQP is not properly prepared, not being prepared in order / not structurized since there are 2 source
document for PQP, no Table of Content, etc.
- Some informations as minimum required per GPG template content are not available yet. Bidder to include
additional description / information for Quality Policy, Interface & communication, Resources, Planning for
project realization, Design & engineering control, Construction/Installation control, Equipment calibration.
- In overall, Bidder is advised to re-submit quality plan using GPG template for more complete information
provided
- Attach Table of Content of Quality Manual if any
2. For ITP, Bidder shall prepare proper and complete ITP using GPG template for civil work and building /
housing work since proposed ITP does not reflect inspection activities related to the work and some items are
not relevant such as test on pressure piping etc.