Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effects of An 8-Week Outdoor Brisk Walking Program On Fatigue in Hi-Tech Industry Employees
Effects of An 8-Week Outdoor Brisk Walking Program On Fatigue in Hi-Tech Industry Employees
research-article2015
WHSXXX10.1177/2165079915589685Workplace Health & SafetyWorkplace Health & Safety
ARTICLE
Abstract: Over 73% of hi-tech industry employees may affect workers’ cognitive function, physiological health,
in Taiwan lack regular exercise. They are exposed and psychological health, subsequently diminishing job
to a highly variable and stressful work environment performance and, in severe cases, causing physiological
for extended periods of time, and may subsequently illnesses and injuries (Ericson-Lidman, Norberg, & Strandberg,
experience depression, detrimental to workers’ 2007; Olson, 2007). Shephard (2005) indicated that regular
physiological and mental health. In this cross-sectional exercise or physical activity can reduce the negative effects
survey, the authors explored the effect of an 8-week brisk (e.g., anxiety) of a sedentary lifestyle, decreasing fatigue and
walking program on the fatigue of employees in the hi- preventing depression. However, an investigation conducted
tech industry. The participants, from a hi-tech company by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare (2014) with
in northern Taiwan, were randomly assigned to an 6,000 full-time workers in the hi-tech industry found that
experimental group (EG; 41 subjects, Mage = 33.34 ± 6.40) 73.4% did not engage in regular exercise. Hence, hi-tech
or control group (CG; 45 subjects, Mage = 29.40 ± 3.60). workers need exercise opportunities that are simple,
Following the 8-week brisk walking program, the EG requiring no complicated skills and performed anywhere at
showed significantly lower scores for subjective fatigue, any time.
working motivation, attention, and overall fatigue. The Brisk walking originated in the United States and has gained
authors confirmed that the 8-week outdoor brisk walking popularity in Germany, England, and Japan. This rhythmic,
program significantly improved the level of fatigue among dynamic, aerobic activity is simple, requires no complicated
employees of the hi-tech industry. The finding serves as skills or expensive equipment, and can be performed anywhere
an important reference for health authorities in Taiwan at any time (Morris & Hardman, 1997). In recent years, brisk
and provides awareness of workplace health promotion walking has become a fitness trend in Taiwan (Taiwan Health
in the hi-tech industry. and Exercise Association [THEA], 2008). Studies have shown that
a daily 30-minute brisk walk improves body composition, blood
lipids, and psychological health. J. L. Lin, Chang, Huang, and
Keywords: hi-tech industry, employees, brisk walking, Lee (2009) found that a 30-minute brisk exercise intervention
fatigue, health promotion
can decrease fatigue among sedentary female workers in a
hospital. Puetz, Flowers, and O’Connor (2008) examined the
T
he disadvantages of working in the high technology effect of a brisk exercise intervention on 36 sedentary healthy
(hi-tech) industry include long work hours, high work adults reporting chronic or persistent feelings of fatigue. The
stress, and overtime (C. Y. Chen, Wu, & Hsu, 2010). results showed that brisk walking reduced feelings of fatigue by
Employees in the hi-tech industry, exposed to a highly 65%.
variable and stressful work environment, are prone to Currently, a majority of studies on brisk walking conducted
develop anxiety due to job performance expectations and in Taiwan or other countries examined its physiological
fatigue. Anxiety and fatigue may subsequently cause implications (e.g., body composition, blood lipids, and
depression and become detrimental to workers’ physiological cardiovascular disease; Kim &Yang, 2005; Tully, Cupples, Chan,
and mental health (C. Y. Chen et al., 2010). Fatigue has been McGlade, & Young, 2005), and its effect on chronic disease and
defined as a subjective feeling related to cognition, mood, in the elderly population (Lin, Yen, et al., 2009; F. T. Lin, Chang,
and behavior (Williamson et al., 2011). Prolonged fatigue Lee, & Yang, 2011).
DOI: 10.1177/2165079915589685. From 1National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences. Address correspondence to: Yi-Ching Huang, Department of Exercise and Health Science,
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, No. 365, Min Te Road 112, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; email: yiching@ntunhs.edu.tw.
For reprints and permissions queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
Copyright © 2015 The Author(s)
436
vol. 63 ■ no. 10 Workplace Health & Safety
437
Workplace Health & Safety October 2015
•• Measure resting heart rate: Find the radial pulse, the deviations, frequencies, and percentages; independent samples t
pulse on the inside of the wrist. Use the pads of the test and chi-square test were used to examine the differences
index (first) and middle fingers, not your thumb. To between the EG (Classes A and B) and CG pretest scores. The
measure the pulse, use a watch or a clock with a second paired t test was used to assess differences between the fatigue
hand. The resting heart rate is calculated by measuring pretest and posttest for both the EG (Classes A and B) and CG.
the number of beats in 15 seconds multiplied by 4. For effectiveness, ANCOVA was used (i.e., the pretest was used
•• Confirm all workers can measure radial pulses as a covariate), and the adjusted means at posttest were the
successfully each time: Workers must measure and record focus. The significance level for all statistics was set at p < .05.
pulses with supervision from qualified occupational
health nurses and exercise specialists. If anyone has Ethical Considerations
difficulty measuring the pulse, nurses and specialists will
This study was reviewed and approved by the Taipei City
guide them individually to confirm that all participants
Hospital Institutional Review Board (Case TCHIRB-1020210-E).
can measure pulses correctly.
All participants were informed about the purpose, process,
•• During the intervention: After covering half the walking
benefits, and risks of this intervention before their applications
distance, staff shout out when to begin to measure pulses
were accepted, and participants could freely decide if they
for 15 seconds. All workers stop walking and measure
wanted to participate or withdraw their applications. Those who
their pulses in pairs for 15 seconds. Occupational health
wished to participate were required to complete two copies of
nurses and exercise specialists supervised and recorded
the Consent to Participate in Research form.
the heart rate of each worker, multiplying the rate by 4 to
calculate their heart rate per minute.
Results
To maintain the quality of the intervention, the number of Eighty-six workers participated in the study; 41 participants
participants was limited to 22 per class, so the 41 workers in the were in the EG, and 45 participants were in the CG. The
EG were divided into Class A (19 persons) and Class B (22 independent samples t test and Pearson’s chi-square test
persons). Participants in each class walked briskly on 2 separate demonstrated no significant differences between the EG and CG
days per week, Class A was scheduled for Mondays and with respect to gender, marital status, education level,
Wednesday, Class B was scheduled for Tuesdays and Thursday occupation, years of work experience, average working hours,
(see the appendix). health history, smoking status, exercise habits, club
A professional trainer managed the exercise program participation, exercise partner, self-reported health conditions,
according to participants’ heart rates to maintain heart rates self-reported happiness, height, weight, BMI, body fat
between 60% and 90% of HRmax. Each brisk walking session percentage, and waist circumference. Only average age was
covered the same distance with duration between 45 minutes and significantly different (p = .01; Tables 1 and 2).
60 minutes. The warm-up and cool-down sessions lasted 10 to 20
minutes. The program continued for 8 weeks. The venues for the
brisk walking program were scheduled during the hour after Difference in Fatigue Status
work, and mainly outdoor walking tracks or sidewalks were Between Pretest and Posttest
used. When raining, brisk walking took place at the indoor sports The Chinese version of the CIS questionnaire measured four
court in the office building. The participants in the CG performed dimensions: subjective fatigue, motivation, activity, and
regular daily activity without any aerobic exercise or continued concentration. The levels of fatigue at pretest between the two
exercising at less than two sessions per week. groups were not significantly different (Table 3). The results
During each session, after covering half the distance, the following the brisk walking intervention were as follows:
workers were grouped in pairs to measure one another’s pulse
rate supervised by occupational health nurses. The pulse rate Subjective fatigue
was multiplied by 4 to calculate their heart rates per minute. After the 8-week brisk walking intervention, the posttest
The HRmax was then calculated with a formula and recorded subjective fatigue score between the EG and CG did not differ
after each measurement. Pulse rate was measured at the halfway significantly (p > .05). However, the pretest/posttest changes in
point of the session to ensure that workers’ heart rate was subjective fatigue in the EG and CG did vary significantly (p <
between 60% and 90% of HRmax. The brisk walking card was .0001; Tables 4 and 5).
stamped each time to record the number of sessions and the
heart rate of workers. Reduction in motivation
After the 8-week brisk walking intervention, the posttest
reduction in motivation between the EG and CG showed a
Data Analysis statistical difference (p < .01). The pretest/posttest changes
Descriptive statistical analyses were used to describe the between the EG and CG also varied significantly (p < .01; Tables
participants’ variable distributions using means, standard 4 and 5).
438
vol. 63 ■ no. 10 Workplace Health & Safety
439
Workplace Health & Safety October 2015
Table 2. Homogeneity Test of Pretest in Healthy Status Between Both Groups
EG (n = 41) CG (n = 45)
Variables M ± SD M ± SD p value Statistics
a
Age 33.34 ± 6.40 29.40 ± 3.59 .01
a
Height 164.39 ± 8.76 168.62 ± 8.76 .28
a
Weight 64.06 ± 13.66 66.55 ± 14.66 .419
a
BMI 23.59 ± 3.89 23.25 ± 3.93 .689
a
Body fat % 28.08 ± 7.07 25.08 ± 8.00 .07
a
Waist circumference 78.60 ± 10.38 79.08 ± 11.39 .839
b
Total exercise days a week .359
None or <1 time 27 (65.8%) 24 (53.3%)
1-2 times a week 13 (31.7%) 18 (40%)
Irregularly 1 (2.4%) 3 (6.6%)
b
Exercise club .862
No 35 (85.4%) 39 (86.7%)
Yes 6 (14.6%) 6 (13.3%)
b
Exercise friends .600
No 26 (63.4%) 25 (55.5%)
Sometimes 11 (26.8%) 18 (40%)
Often 4 (9.7%) 2 (4.4%)
b
Perceived health status .449
Bad 30 (73.2%) 30 (66.6%)
Ordinary 9 (22.0%) 15 (33.3%)
Well 2 (4.8%) 0 (0%)
b
Perceived happiness status .424
Bad 5 (12.2%) 2 (4.4%)
Ordinary 23 (56.1%) 23 (51.1%)
Well 13 (31.7%) 20 (4.4%)
440
vol. 63 ■ no. 10 Workplace Health & Safety
EG (n = 41) CG (n = 45)
Change amount Change amount 95% CI
Variables M ± SD M ± SD (Low, high) paired t p
Subjective fatigue −5.83 6.72 −0.13 6.76 [−8.59, −2.80] −3.91 <.0001
Reduction in motivation −2.22 3.26 0.07 3.90 [−3.83, −0.74] −2.93 .004
Reduction in activity −0.90 4.06 1.11 2.77 [−3.49, −0.54] −2.71 .008
Reduction in concentration −2.20 4.49 0.07 3.48 [−3.97, −0.54] −2.62 .01
Overall fatigue −11.20 13.35 1.40 12.80 [−18.20, −6.98] −4.47 <.0001
441
Workplace Health & Safety October 2015
EG (n = 41) CG (n = 45)
Change amount Change amount
Variables M ± SE M ± SE F p
Subjective fatigue 25.80 1.03 30.49 0.98 10.11 .0021
Reduction in motivation 12.40 0.49 14.17 0.46 6.45 .0130
Reduction in activity 8.72 0.44 9.94 0.42 3.66 .0592
Reduction in concentration 16.59 0.60 18.40 0.57 4.39 .0392
Overall fatigue 64.06 2.00 73.39 1.90 12.99 .0005
Note. Covariate: the pretest fatigue score and age were used as covariates. EG = experimental group; CG = control group; SE = standard error.
covariate for ANCOVA when comparing the groups on the significantly (F = 4.39, p < .05). The adjusted score for the EG
effects of the exercise intervention. Before ANCOVA, the was 16.59, which was significantly lower than that of the CG
homogeneity of the within-class regression coefficient was (18.4). This finding indicated that the 8-week outdoor brisk
calculated to determine if the slope of each group was the walking intervention improved concentration for the EG.
same, a fitness determinant of the homogeneity hypothesis. At
pretest, the mean age of the EG was significantly higher than Overall fatigue
that of the CG. No significant between-group difference was After eliminating the effects of pretest scores and age, the
identified for the other demographic variables. The pretest posttest overall fatigue scores for the EG and CG varied
fatigue score and age were used as covariates to eliminate their significantly (F = 12.99, p < .001). The adjusted score for the EG
effects (Table 6). was 64.06, which was significantly lower than that of the CG
(73.39). This finding indicated that the 8-week outdoor brisk
Subjective fatigue walking intervention improved the degree of overall fatigue of
After eliminating the effects of pretest scores and age, the workers in the Taiwanese hi-tech industry.
posttest subjective fatigue scores for the EG and CG varied
significantly (F = 10.11, p < .01). The adjusted score for the EG Discussion
was 25.80, which was significantly lower than that of the CG
(30.49). This finding indicated that the 8-week outdoor brisk The hypothesis of this study was that the 8-week outdoor
walking intervention improved subjective fatigue for the EG. brisk walking program would significantly improve the level of
fatigue of workers in the hi-tech industry; study findings
Reduction in motivation answered the hypothesis and demonstrated intervention
After removing the effects of pretest scores and age, the benefits.
posttest motivation scores for the EG and CG varied significantly Lee (2006) examined the effect of brisk walking on middle-
(F = 6.45, p < .05). The adjusted score for the EG was 12.40, aged women. The women were assigned either moderate
which was significantly lower than that of the CG (14.17). This intensity, brisk walking, or CG with no exercise; they engaged
finding indicated that the 8-week outdoor brisk walking in brisk walking three times per week. Puetz et al. (2008)
intervention had a positive effect on motivation for the EG. examined the effect of exercise on sedentary healthy adults with
chronic or persistent fatigue. The healthy adults were assigned
Reduction in activity to moderate intensity exercise, low intensity exercise, or no
After eliminating the effects of pretest scores and age, exercise groups. Twenty-minute brisk walking occurred three
posttest activity scores for the EG and CG did not vary times per week. The groups that received the brisk walking
significantly (F = 3.66, p > .05). The adjusted score for the EG intervention showed less fatigue; the CG without the brisk
was 8.72 and 9.94 for the CG. This finding showed that the walking intervention did not demonstrate less fatigue. These
8-week outdoor brisk walking intervention did not affect the findings are consistent with the results of this study.
activity for the EG and CG. Workers in the hi-tech industry are exposed to a highly
variable and stressful work environment for extended periods of
Reduction in concentration time, and thus are prone to fatigue due to overwork. Several
After eliminating the effects of pretest scores and age, the studies have proposed that exercise can lessen fatigue. Exercise
posttest concentration scores for the EG and CG varied intensity does not have to be high or strong to alleviate fatigue;
442
vol. 63 ■ no. 10 Workplace Health & Safety
less frequency and time can prevent muscle ache or discomfort Limitations of This Study
(H. L. Chen, Fang, Chuang, & Chu, 2013; Wu & Ko, 2012). Wu Potential limitations of this study included the following:
and Ko (2012) also suggested that a rest day after exercise is
optimal because rest promotes recovery following a workout •• Budget constraints and workforce limitations that resulted
and therefore prevents discomfort. This study further in the posttest being completed immediately after the
demonstrated that a moderate intensity brisk walking program 8 weeks of brisk walking intervention; the participants
at a frequency of twice each week for more than 45 minutes per were not monitored later. As a result, it is not known
session at 60% to 90% of the HRmax reduces fatigue for workers whether the improvement in fatigue status from this period
in the hi-tech industry. of training continued after the study was terminated.
In previous studies, CIS was primarily used to distinguish •• Because of budget constraints, the researchers did not
fatigued patients from healthy patients. CIS has also been used use pulse monitor equipment to detect pulse changes.
to measure fatigue, making it a useful instrument in assessing Although the researchers confirmed that all participants
population groups experiencing fatigue (Vercoulen, Alberts, & assessed their pulses accurately by individual oversight,
Bleijenberg, 1999; Vercoulen et al., 1994). H. L. Chen et al. some objective personal errors may have occurred.
(2013) used CIS and an exercise behavior questionnaire to •• The researchers adopted a randomized controlled trial
examine the association between exercise behavior and level of design; however, it was only conducted in Taipei City,
fatigue among elementary school teachers. The results showed and the size of the valid sample was only 86. Thus, the
a negative correlation between fatigue and exercise behavior, findings cannot be extended to the rest of the population
indicating that elementary school teachers who performed in Taiwan.
regular exercise were less likely to be fatigued, which is
consistent with the findings of this study. The results confirmed
the notion that exercise improves fatigue. Conclusion
A literature review showed that CIS has been used primarily Brisk walking is an acceptable form of exercise for a large
to categorize fatigue and evaluate its prevalence rate (Bültmann, portion of the population. It does not require formal training or
Kant, Beurskens, & van den Brandt, 2002) or to identify the special equipment, and individuals can walk in their own
level of fatigue among different occupational groups (Aratake locality and time.
et al., 2007). Few studies have used CIS to determine the effect Studies typically recommend regular exercise of three
of exercise intervention on fatigue (H. L. Chen et al., 2013). CIS 30-minute sessions weekly. This study has shown that a twice
is comprised of physiological, psychological, working weekly 60-minute session is also beneficial. Specifically, workers
motivations, and productivity evaluation dimensions; however, can exercise in the natural environment near the office with
limited studies have examined the influence of exercise on coworkers, facilitating bonding between workers and
these dimensions. It has been proposed that severe fatigue in development of a regular exercise routine. Brisk walking is
workers can lead to muscle ache, weakness, decreased memory suitable for hi-tech workers who sit for long periods of time,
and concentration, impaired judgment, poor reaction time and minimally exercise, and perform stressful work, as walking
movement, and impaired work performance (Ericson-Lidman promotes healthy lifestyles over time. The researchers confirmed
et al., 2007; Olson, 2007). This study used CIS to measure the that the 8-week outdoor brisk walking program can significantly
effect of an outdoor brisk walking intervention on the four reduce fatigue among hi-tech employees. These findings serve
dimensions (i.e., subjective fatigue, reduction in motivation, as a reference for health authorities in Taiwan and provide
reduction in activity, and reduction in concentration) of fatigue awareness about workplace health promotion in the hi-tech
and found noticeable improvement in EG. industry.
443
Workplace Health & Safety October 2015
Appendix
444
vol. 63 ■ no. 10 Workplace Health & Safety
445