Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 1652-1153
ISBN 978-91-7529-247-2
Abstract
Mialinn Arvidsson Lindvall (2018) Physiotherapeutic perspectives on balance
control after stroke: exercises, experiences and measures. Örebro Studies in
Care Sciences 75.
Papers I-III have been reprinted with permission from the publishers:
SAGE Publications Ltd, Elsevier Ltd, and Taylor & Francis Group.
After stroke there is an acute phase where the patient sometimes is not
medically stable. The duration of the acute phase varies depending on the
severity of stroke. During the first week, spontaneous recovery often takes
Balance
The word “balance” is often used in association with terms such as
“stability” and “postural control”. In this thesis, “balance” is used
synonymously with “postural control”. According to Shumway-Cook and
Woollacott (19), postural control is an interaction between the individual,
the task and the environment. Having postural control involves
controlling one’s position in space for stability by keeping the centre of
mass within the base of support. All activities require postural control and
every task has an orientation component and a stability component.
However, the stability and orientation requirements will vary depending
on the task and the environment (20). To keep the body in position
requires a complex interaction of the musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, and
cognitive systems (19). In persons with stroke all the systems involved in
balance may be negatively affected (19); therefore, balance is often
impaired after stroke (8, 9, 16, 17, 20, 21).
Definitions
According to the World Confederation for Physical Therapy (WCPT),
physiotherapy is a service provided by physiotherapists to individuals and
populations to develop, maintain and restore maximum movement and
functional ability throughout their lifespan. Physiotherapists are concerned
with identifying and maximizing quality of life and movement potential
within the spheres of promotion, prevention, treatment/intervention,
habilitation and rehabilitation (22). Physiotherapy is based on knowledge
about the body and its movement needs, which is central to determining
strategies for diagnosis and interventions. Rehabilitation is described by
the WHO as a process that enables the individual to identify problems and
reach his or her optimal ability, with the aim to facilitate independence
and social integration (23).
Balance measurements
In clinical practice and research it is important to evaluate changes,
improvements or deteriorations after an intervention. It is vital that the
measuring instrument reflects the impairments, activity limitations or
restrictions of interest. It is also important that the measure is both reliable
and valid, and that it is suitable for the functional level of the patient:
neither too easy nor too difficult. To facilitate the usability of a measure it
is preferable that the procedure should be quick and easy and possible to
perform in different environments.
To measure balance in persons after stroke there are several valid and
reliable measurements used in both clinical practice and research, such as
the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (56, 57), the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) (50,
Qualitative studies in which persons with stroke have had the opportunity
to describe their experience of balance control in everyday life are scarce.
Having good balance is described as an important factor in outdoor
walking and participation in exercises (62, 63). Experience of fears related
to falls (64, 65) can vary from limited awareness to pervasive fear (65).
Smith et al suggest that discussing strategies and assessing fear of falling
could help the persons to manage their fears (64). To have sufficient
balance is mandatory for activity and participation but there is a lack of
knowledge about how persons who have had a stroke experience their
own balance. This could be a barrier to understanding the complexity of
impaired balance and to further developing patient-centred interventions.
Although there are several valid and reliable measures of balance for
persons with stroke, there is a need to also measure unilateral limitations
and asymmetric weight distribution during walking. The SSST includes
these aspects of balance and can be used in the assessment procedure, but
its psychometric proprieties have not been investigated for stroke. There
are several studies presenting outcome of balance using test instruments
and rating scales; however, few studies report on persons with stroke
describing their balance limitations in their own words. By combining all
these different perspectives, this thesis will investigate and contribute to a
wider understanding and knowledge of balance in persons who have had a
stroke.
In Study III the inclusion criteria were: >6 months since onset of the most
recent stroke, self-reported walking impairment, and walking ability of at
least 10 metres with or without using a walking aid. We aimed to recruit
about 80 individuals as recommended for reliability studies (66, 67). The
persons with stroke received both written and verbal information about
the study. Letters were mailed to them or handed to them by the
physiotherapists at the health care center. Each person was thereafter
contacted by telephone and provided with verbal information about the
study. A total of 81 persons agreed to participate in the study.
In Study IV, the inclusion criteria were: having had a first-ever stroke in
2015–2016, living in Örebro County, and having reported impaired
balance ability, unaffected speech, independence in toileting and dressing,
and walking ability indoors and outdoors with or without a walking aid,
in the 3-month follow-up questionnaire of the Swedish Stroke Register
(Riksstroke). Study IV had a mixed method design (68) with a qualitative
approach and it was aimed to include about 20 persons. A total of 45
persons were consecutively by mail and thereafter by phone to invite them
to participate. As well as using a consecutive approach, a purposeful
sampling was used based on background variables, such as age and sex, in
order to achieve a maximum variation sample. Twenty persons initially
agreed to participate; however, one person later declined further
participation, thus giving a sample size of 19 participants.
*In Study IV, time since most recent stroke is given in months.
The sessions started and ended with the participants sitting on chairs.
Together with the physiotherapist, the participants reflected on the
exercises, experiences, bodily and mental aspects, and their expectations
before the upcoming session. The intention was that they should relate
how the movements felt in their bodies, and how they had integrated the
movements in their everyday life. All group sessions followed the same
structure; however, exercises were individually adjusted and the intensity
and degree of difficulty were increased by the physiotherapists over the 8-
week period.
Body function
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Items 5 and 6 was used to
assess stroke severity (69). In item 5, with the patient in a supine position,
the arm was lifted to 45 degrees; in item 6, also in supine position, the leg
was lifted to 30 degrees. Performance was graded from 0 = able to hold
the arm for 10 seconds/the leg for 5 seconds, to 4 = no movement in either
arm or leg (Study III).
Dynamic balance
Berg Balance Scale: Score on the BBS was the primary outcome measure in
Study I. The BBS measures the ability to assume and maintain a given
position while performing a voluntary movement. The scale consists of 14
tasks of varying difficulty that are found in the activities performed in
everyday life. One task is to rise from sitting to standing position, another
to reach forward, or to pick up something from the floor or stand on one
leg. The tasks are graded 0–4. The BSS is a reliable and valid measure for
persons with stroke (57, 72) (Study I).
Walking balance
Dynamic Gait Index: The DGI assesses dynamic balance in eight items
representing different walking tasks. The DGI has been found to be valid
and reliable, with good interrater reliability, in persons with stroke (58).
The tasks are: changing walking speed, walking while turning the head,
walking around or over obstacles, and walking with a pivot turn.
Performance in each item is rated by the physiotherapist on a 4-point scale
ranging from 0 = severe impairment, to 3 = normal walking ability
without a walking aid. The maximum total score is 24 points (50) (Study
III).
Six-Spot Step Test: The SSST is performed in a taped walkway (test field)
that is 5 metres long and 1 metre wide. A circle with a 20 cm diameter is
marked in the middle of each end line of the test field. Two more circles of
the same size are marked on each of the sidelines of the test field, with a
distance from the end line of 1 metre and 3 metres on one side, and 2
metres and 4 metres on the other side. One of the end circles is empty and
is used as the starting point. A cylindrical wooden block, with a diameter
of 8 cm and a height of 4 cm, and weighing 134 grams, is placed in the
centre of the other five circles (60) (see Figure 1). The test person starts in
the empty circle at one of the short sides of the test field and the test starts
when the participant first lifts one foot from the start circle. The
instruction is to do the test in fast walking, criss-crossing from circle to
circle and in each trial using the same foot to shove the blocks out of the
circles. The test ends when the last block is shoved out of the end circle.
The SSST was performed in four trials, and the mean value of these was
Figure1. Schematic overview of the Six-Spot Step Test (SSST) test field
Walking endurance
Six-minute walk test: The 6-minute walk test is a measure of walking
endurance that has been found to be valid and reliable in persons with
stroke (48). In the 6-minute walk test in this study, the person walked
during 6 minutes and the distance in metres was recorded. A track lap of
30 metres, with every third metre marked, was used (Study I).
Balance confidence
Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale: The ABC scale is a patient-
reported questionnaire that assesses self-rated balance confidence when
performing daily activities (51, 78). The ABC scale has been found to be
valid and reliable in persons with stroke (79). A validated Swedish version
of the ABC scale was used (79). Using an 11-point scale, the participants
reported how safe and secure they felt when performing 16 different
indoor and outdoor activities, ranging from 0% = not at all safe and
secure, to 100% = completely safe and secure. The item scores were
summarized and then divided by 16 (the number of items) (Studies I, III
and IV).
Data collection
In all the studies the data were collected in a consistent order, starting
with background variables such as demographic characteristics, then
progressing to use of walking aids, and self-reported number of falls
during the last 3 months.
Study I: In Study I, data collection took place at four health care centres
from October 2011 to December 2012 and was performed by four
clinically experienced physiotherapists. The follow-up tests were
conducted 1 and 6 weeks after the intervention period (9 and 14 weeks
post-baseline, respectively). All measures were performed in a
standardized order and if walking aids were used, they were used during
all test occasions. The same physiotherapists performed the pre-, post- and
the follow-up testing using the BBS, TUG test, TUG cognitive test, 6-
minute walk test and TST. The ABC scale and SF-36 were completed by
the participants.
Study II: In Study II the individual semi-structured interviews (82) with the
participants took place at the participants’ respective health care centre
about 1 week after the intervention ended, from December 2011 to
January 2013. The doctoral student (M.L.A.L.) conducted all the
interviews. An interview guide was used, covering experiences of changes
in the body, balance and daily living, as well as reflections on the structure
and content of the intervention. The interviews lasted between 10 and 40
minutes. For practical reasons, the four physiotherapists were interviewed
in pairs. The same interview guide as used for the participants was used
for the physiotherapists. The interviews were conducted by the doctoral
student (M.L.A.L.) and a second author (A.F.), and lasted approximately
Study III: The data collection took place at five primary health care centres
in Örebro county in Sweden from June 2014 until November 2015. The
tests were performed by five physiotherapists specialized in neurological
physiotherapy, including the author, M.L.A.L., performing 70% the data
collection. The tests were performed on two occasions, 3–7 days apart.
The tests were performed in a standardized order, starting with the ABC
scale, followed by the TST, the FSST, the DGI, the TUG test and, finally,
the SSST. To keep all conditions as stable as possible, the same
physiotherapist performed the tests on both occasions, at the same
location in an ordinary hallway at the primary health care centres, and at
around the same time of the day. If the person needed a walking aid, it
was used during both test occasions. At the first test occasion all balance
and walking tests were performed; on the second test occasion only the
SSST was performed. The participants were instructed not to change their
activity habits between the two test occasions. During the tests they wore
comfortable shoes and if necessary they could rest between the measures.
Study IV: Data were collected in Örebro County from October 2016 to
January 2017. The data collection was conducted at a place chosen by the
participants, in the participants’ home (n=16) or at their health care centre
(n=3). The data consisted of qualitative interviews and data from
measurement of balance using the SSST and the ABC scale. All data were
collected on the same occasion, starting with the interview. The semi-
structured individual interviews started with a broad initial question,
followed by more specific questions based on the study’s aim (68). The
participants were asked to describe their experience of balance and
balance impairment in their everyday life, including strategies to handle
situations that challenged balance control, and how impaired balance
affected their life. The doctoral student (M.L.A.L.) conducted the data
collection. The interviews took 20–60 minutes, and all interviews were
audio-recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. One pilot interview
was performed to test the procedure. The pilot interview was not included
in the total sample.
In Study III, to evaluate the convergent validity between the first test
session of the SSST and the other measures, Spearman’s and Pearson’s
correlation coefficients were calculated with correlation coefficients <0.30
interpreted as weak, 0.30–0.59 as moderate, and ≥0.60 as strong (84).
Evaluation of validity includes defining the extent to which an instrument
measures what it intended to measure (85); convergent validity means that
two measures are believed to reflect the same phenomenon while
discriminant validity reflects measures that are believed to assess different
characteristics (85).
For the statistical analyses, SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY,
USA) was used. The results together with the baseline characteristics were
presented by descriptive statistics, median, mean, SD and percentages.
The mixed analysis was performed in a stepwise procedure (see Figure 2).
The qualitative and quantitative data were first separately analysed. In the
final step, using the qualitative categories as the starting point, an overall
interpretation of any emerging pattern was performed, by adding
All participants received both verbal and written information about the
respective study, and gave a written consent. In Studies I–III the
participants were a convenience sample of persons with stroke visiting the
primary health care centre. They were recruited by physiotherapists with
experience in neurological stroke rehabilitation. The doctoral student
(M.L.A.L) worked part-time at one of the primary health care centres but
had no ongoing professional contact with any of the participants.
Participants in Study IV were identified from the Swedish Stroke Register
(Riksstroke) and were contacted by mail and phone and had no earlier
contact with the physiotherapist responsible for the recruitment. It is
possible that persons who frequently visited the primary health care centre
may have felt obliged to participate in the studies. For this reason, all
persons were assured by the physiotherapist responsible for the
recruitment that participation was voluntary, that they could leave the
study at any time without giving any reason and that participation in the
study did not affect other therapy at the primary health care centre (94).
One ethical consideration is that performing a balance test might bring the
fact of impaired balance back to the person’s mind. Other aspects that
could have impact on the persons mind is the interview sessions. Therefore
in Studies II and IV the persons had the opportunity to choose the
interview location and determine where they would take the balance tests.
If the interview session or the balance measure recalled any negative
feelings or any concerns related to the study they could contact the author
at any time. The author could help arrange for participants to get
psychological help if needed. None of the participants in any study
reported any negative aspects or asked for further help.
Further, since all of the participants had impaired balance there was a risk
for accidental falls when performing the balance measures. The balance
The mean difference between the first and the second test was about 1
second (Figure 4) (Table 3). The Bland-Altman plot gives more values
under the line than above, illustrating a better performance in the second
test, where 57 (70%) of the participants improved on their performance in
test 2 (Figure 4). The plot also shows that the intra-individual SD
increased with increased time taken to perform the SSST (Figure 3).
Indications of heteroscedasticity, with larger variability for higher test
values, were also seen in the plot. Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the
absolute difference between test 2 and 1 and the mean of the two sessions
was 0.70. One outlier was found (Figure 4), and after it had been
removed, heteroscedasticity diminished to a value of 0.60. The test-retest
results of the SSST are presented in Table 3. The ICC2.1 values for the
SSST ranged from 0.93 to 0.96. The SEM% values ranged between 14.7%
Table 2 Correlations between the Six-Spot Step Test (SSST) and the other tests,
using Pearson’s correlation coefficient for timed measures and Spearman’s
correlations for rating scales
Test Correlation p-value
coefficient
Variable Mean time Within Mean time Within SEM SRD 95% ICC2.1 Mean (SD) Systematic
(SD), group p- (SD), Group SEM% SRD% SRD (95% Limits of changes p-
seconds/ value seconds/ p-value CI) agreement value
Median Median Median
(min/max) (min/max) (min; max)
Mean of four SSST measures 23.7 (15.8)/ 22.7 (17.7)/ 3.42 9.48 -10.47 0.96 -0.99 (4.77) 0.0011
CI = confidence interval; ICC2.1 = intraclass correlation coefficient, SEM = standard error of measurement; SEM% = standard error of measurement, in per cent
values; SRD = smallest real difference; SRD% = smallest real difference
Mean of test 1
and test 2
Figure 4 Bland-Altman plot showing the mean time (in seconds) achieved
in test 1 and test 2. Dotted lines represent means (bold dotted line) and
limits of agreement (light dotted line).
In the second theme, “Feeling trust and confidence despite dizziness and
unsteadiness”, the participants described their capacities and feelings of
confidence about still being able to do things themselves in spite of their
balance impairment. Balance in everyday life was limited, yet the
participants were, to a varying degree, active in social activities. They
described having accepted their new life situation and said they were
confident in their ability to manage their everyday activities.
“… they help me, they do, but that...I’m stubborn person and I want to
manage on my own for as long as I can…”(Participant 11)
“…You can’t say there have been problems; rather...small challenges have
arisen, but nothing so significant that I was not able to deal with
it.”(Participant 17)
The mixed results illustrating that almost all participants are represented
in every qualitative category. There was no explicit association between
those scoring low on the ABC test and/or walking slowly in the SSST, and
the categories representing experiences of limitations, nor between those
scoring higher, walking faster and categories not showing limitations. The
different data sets provide different, somewhat complementary and
confirmatory information on balance. The mixed results illustrate that
impaired balance can be experienced as a challenge and, at the same time,
that the individual can feel trust and confidence, no matter how they score
on the ABC scale or perform on the SSST.
There are both differences and similarities between the study by Bang et
al(97) and Study I in this thesis. The BAT intervention in both studies was
based on the same framework of movements, but the intensity of BAT in
Bang et al was much greater and their intervention consisted of both BAT
and walking training. By contrast, in our Study I the intervention consisted
only of BAT and the controls received no intervention. These studies
together suggest that BAT can be used as a complement to physiotherapy
but further studies are needed to evaluate the specific effects that BAT may
have for patients with stroke, as well as which exercises are the most
suitable and at what intensity. In studies including other patient groups,
such as fibromyalgia patients (99) and transfemoral amputees (44), the
intervention lasted much longer, namely, once a week for 3 months (99)
and 10 months (44). Based on these studies it can be deduced that longer
and more intensive interventions with BAT are optimal. On the other
hand, all these studies have small patient samples and the results should be
interpreted with care. There is no gold standard for what constitutes the
most beneficial physiotherapeutic training for stroke patients (37). As BAT
consists of simple, repetitive movements, with the aim of strengthening the
person’s resources and finding a new attitude towards the body, it can be
seen as a complement to balance training in persons with stroke.
In the qualitative study (Study II), exercising with BAT was described as
simple yet challenging. The participants experienced that they had to face
their limitations and explore stability limits in different positions, as well
as using varying body weight distribution. We were not able to measure
body weight distribution. In the study by Sjodahl et al in participants with
transfemoral amputation, a more symmetric body weight distribution and
less use of walking aids was reported (44). The authors used gait analysis
and force plates to examine changes in the legs post-intervention (44). In
future research in persons with stroke (a population who often experience
difficulties with weight distribution), it would be interesting to use force
plates when evaluating BAT.
What was highlighted by almost all participants was the value of being
part of a group with other persons with stroke. Group activities are often
seen as valuable (103) and the participants felt comfortable to share
similar experiences and appreciated the opportunity to do so. Although no
effects were identified in Study I, the positive experiences narrated by
In Study III in this thesis, the SSST showed strong convergent validity with
the TUG test, the DGI and the FSST. Most previous studies of the SSST
were performed in people with MS (60, 108-110). In a study by Fritz et al
(108), a strong correlation between the SSST and the TUG has been
shown. Tests involving longer distances, such as the 2-minute and 6-
minute walk tests, have also been used in studies by Fritz et al (108) and
Sandroff and colleagues (108, 110). Sandroff et al also showed moderate
to strong correlation with balance confidence. They highlighted the
novelty of the SSST as a measure of ambulatory function also including
elements of balance confidence. In this thesis the SSST also showed
moderate correlations with the ABC scale and therefore the SSST could
give valuable information about feelings of confidence in ability to carry
out activities at home and in the community, as assessed by the ABC scale.
The correlation coefficients between the SSST and the FSST and the DGI
indicate that the SSST can capture dynamic balance also in persons with
stroke.
Based on the high SRD% and SEM% values in the present study, the most
suitable way of applying the SSST is to calculate a person’s mean time for
four trials during which they shove twice with each leg. This is how the
SSST was applied in the original study by Nieuwenhuis et al (60) in people
with MS.
Due to stroke deficits, persons with stroke often have a hemiparetic side
(8). Therefore, in Study III the test-retest involved shoving with both the
paretic and the non-paretic limb. The reliability values were high for both
performances. Participants achieved a faster performance in the SSST
when standing on their paretic leg while shoving the block with their non-
paretic limb, compared with the opposite. The paretic limb often lacks
strength and coordination and in our study population this might have
made the test more challenging and slowed down the performance.
Another possible explanation for a faster performance when shoving with
the non-paretic side could be the possibility to take a quick step with that
leg to restore balance after the kick.
The SSST was easy and quick to perform in the primary health care
settings as in the home environment and the participants enjoyed the
“game like” kicking in the test, as has also been reported in a previous
study using the SSST (108). Based on the results of this study, the SSST is
a valid measure of balance during walking; however, its sensitivity for
capturing changes over time needs to be further evaluated.
The participants’ narratives and their scoring on the ABC scale were not
always consistent. The participants had a median ABC score of 67.5%. In
a study by Yiu et al, persons with stroke were reported to maintain lower
balance confidence compared with controls for at least 12 months post-
stroke (114). A balance confidence score of <80 indicates that there is
room for improvement (78). Even though the participants in our study
rated perceived balance confidence as low to moderate (67.5), they
expressed feelings of acceptance, indicating that they had found solutions
in their post-stroke life. These findings are similar to a study by Kubina et
al (2013), in which persons with stroke highlighted the importance of
being in charge of decisions and contributing in social relationships (115).
To get a broader perspective, gain further knowledge and involve these
persons in balance rehabilitation, a mix of measured balance, self-rated
balance and asking the persons about experience of balance is preferred.
Measurements
The included measurements were chosen for different reasons. The
objective as well as the subjective measures covered the different types of
balance: dynamic balance (e.g. balance while walking) and static balance.
The instruments are often used in stroke rehabilitation. However,
measures of cognitive functions and fatigue, if repeated, might have
captured more subtle changes when evaluating BAT. A gait analysis with
force plates might also have captured changes in balance performance. In
Study III a cognitive test and a test screening for falls would have been
valuable for testing the usability of SSST as a test in everyday life.
Participants
Recruitment of the participants in Studies I–III was by convenience
sampling of persons visiting the primary health care centre. Convenience
sampling has limitations, such as that persons participating in clinical
studies have volunteered to participate and are often positive towards the
research and study method and motivated to improve, which may have
influenced the results in these studies, and may therefore threaten the
external validity. In Study I the participants were informed that they
would be allocated to either the control or the intervention group. Some of
the participants allocated to the control group expressed disappointment
at not receiving the intervention and started exercising on their own. This
may explain the improvement seen in some of the measures for the control
group and, again, this constitutes a threat to the external validity (104).
Data collection
In all four studies the data collection was performed in a standardized
order and the test protocol was followed carefully. In all studies the
physiotherapists who participated in the data collection were specialized in
neurological physiotherapy, with clinical experience in physiotherapy for
patients with stroke. In Studies I and III, to strengthen the internal validity
the physiotherapists were introduced to the study protocol, all the
measuring instruments and the procedure. All conditions were kept as
stable as possible. In Study I none of the physiotherapists performing the
data collection participated in the intervention. They were not blinded, but
they had no insight into the intervention. To increase the internal validity
in Studies I and III, the same physiotherapists performed the retests, at the
same location in an ordinary hallway at the primary health care centre,
and around the same time of the day.
The intervention in Study I continued for 8 weeks. This time period was
based on how physiotherapists in primary health care in the county
usually conduct BAT, and was also selected for practical reasons such as
Data analysis
In Study II, two out of the three authors (M.L.A.L) and (A.F) had a pre-
understanding as physiotherapists in stroke rehabilitation, (A.A.C) is a
registered nurse, experienced in qualitative methods. Studies III and IV
also included a neurologist specialized in stroke (P.A). The mixed
experience of the researchers may increase the credibility of the findings
(116, 117) as it likely brought a broad perspective to the analysis.
Throughout the qualitative analysis procedure, to support trustworthiness
(83, 104, 116) the results were discussed and reflected on in a back and
forth process and all authors were engaged in the data analysis in various
steps. The analysis was performed in both the software programs
Microsoft Word (Microsoft Corp., Seattle, WA, USA)’and NVivo 11 (QSP
International, Victoria, Australia). There are strengths and limitations
with both. The analysis process is presented both in the text and in figures,
with meaning units, categories and themes given. Quotes have been
presented to support the text and further enhance the credibility of the
study (83).
Persons with balance limitations after stroke related that they were able to
manage their life, although this could at times be challenging. Evaluation
of balance during walking and self-rated balance confidence
complemented the subjective narratives of living with balance limitations.
The participants related that everyday life was challenged by the
continuous feeling of dizziness and instability.
Kumla vårdcentral, with Annika Roman and Lennart Svärd for support
during all these years. All colleges at the Rehabilitation department at
Kumla healthcare centre for your always positive attitudes and your
tolerance with me popping in some days at the week.
The Medical Library, USÖ and Birgitta Eriksson for all your help with the
Endnote, databases searches and requires of articles.
The running team at UFC; Marie Matérne, Emma Nilsing Strid, Lars
Hagberg, Anna Duberg and Karin Hilden for connecting running and
research in a much higher level. After a run no scientific mountain is too
high or too step.
Friends for always being there and for helping me getting things into
perspective, not always knowing what I was doing but supported anyhow.
My French parents for having a second home in the mountain where I can
reload my batteries.
My sisters Sophia and Gry, we help and encourages each other. We will
always do!
My husband Henrik, this has not been possible without you. We did it!
Olle och Nisse, mina hjältar. Jag är så stolt, glad och lycklig över att vara
er mamma.
1. Feigin VL, Mensah GA, Norrving B, Murray CJ, Roth GA. Atlas of the
Global Burden of Stroke (1990-2013): The GBD 2013 Study.
Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):230-6.
20. Pollock AS, Durward BR, Rowe PJ, Paul JP. What is balance? Clin
Rehabil. 2000;14(4):402-6.
26. Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Richards CL,
Cote R. A task-orientated intervention enhances walking distance and
speed in the first year post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin
Rehabil. 2004;18(5):509-19.
31. Yang YR, Wang RY, Lin KH, Chu MY, Chan RC. Task-oriented
progressive resistance strength training improves muscle strength and
functional performance in individuals with stroke. Clin Rehabil.
2006;20(10):860-70.
32. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2013(9):Cd000197.
36. Schmid AA, Van Puymbroeck M, Altenburger PA, Dierks TA, Miller
KK, Damush TM, et al. Balance and balance self-efficacy are associated
with activity and participation after stroke: a cross-sectional study in
people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(6):
1101-7.
37. English C, Hillier SL, Lynch EA. Circuit class therapy for improving
mobility after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:Cd007513.
43. Gard G. Body awareness therapy for patients with fibromyalgia and
chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(12):725-8.
46. Eriksson EM, Moller IE, Soderberg RH, Eriksson HT, Kurlberg GK.
Body awareness therapy: a new strategy for relief of symptoms in
irritable bowel syndrome patients. World J Gastroenterol.
2007;13(23):3206-14.
49. Graham JE, Ostir GV, Fisher SR, Ottenbacher KJ. Assessing walking
speed in clinical research: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract.
2008;14(4):552-62.
51. Myers AM, Powell LE, Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Brawley LR, Sherk W.
Psychological indicators of balance confidence: relationship to actual
and perceived abilities. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.
1996;51(1):M37-43.
55. Torkia C, Best KL, Miller WC, Eng JJ. Balance Confidence: A
Predictor of Perceived Physical Function, Perceived Mobility, and
Perceived Recovery 1 Year After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(7):1064-71.
63. Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Tawashy AE. Exercise perceptions among people
with stroke: Barriers and facilitators to participation. Int J Ther
Rehabil. 2011;18(9):520-30.
69. Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, Welch KM, Mascha EJ, Levine S, et al.
Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training.
NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1994;25(11):2220-6.
70. Newcomer KL, Krug HE, Mahowald ML. Validity and reliability of
the timed-stands test for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other
chronic diseases. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(1):21-7.
75. Blennerhassett JM, Jayalath VM. The Four Square Step Test is a
feasible and valid clinical test of dynamic standing balance for use in
ambulant people poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2008;89(11):2156-61.
76. Goh EY, Chua SY, Hong SJ, Ng SS. Reliability and concurrent validity
of Four Square Step Test scores in subjects with chronic stroke: a pilot
study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(7):1306-11.
77. Dite W, Temple VA. A clinical test of stepping and change of direction
to identify multiple falling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
2002;83(11):1566-71.
81. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE, Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-
-I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and
construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med.
1995;41(10):1349-58.
84. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes
research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20.
87. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater
reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420-8.
90. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement
between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet.
1986;1(8476):307-10.
92. Huang SL, Hsieh CL, Wu RM, Tai CH, Lin CH, Lu WS. Minimal
detectable change of the timed "up & go" test and the dynamic gait
index in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2011;91(1):
114-21.
93. Creswell WJ, Plano LV. Designing and conducting mixed method
research. United States of America: SAGE publications, Inc.; 2011.
97. Bang DH, Cho HS. Effect of body awareness training on balance and
walking ability in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled
trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(1):198-201.
98. Bang DH, Noh HJ, Cho HS. Effects of body awareness training on
mild visuospatial neglect in patients with acute stroke: a pilot
randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(4):1191-3.
104. Polit D, Beck TC. Nursing Research. Generating and assessing evidence
for nursing practice.: Lillpincott Williams & Wilkkins, a Wolter
Kluwer business; 2008.
106. An HJ, Kim JI, Kim YR, Lee KB, Kim DJ, Yoo KT, et al. The effect of
various dual task training methods with gait on the balance and gait of
patients with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(8):1287-91.
108. Fritz NE, Jiang A, Keller J, Zackowski KM. Utility of the Six-Spot Step
Test as a Measure of Walking Performance in Ambulatory Individuals
With Multiple Sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(4):507-12.
109. Pavan K, Tilbery CP, Lianza S, Marangoni BE. Validation of the "Six
Step Spot Test" for gait among patients with multiple sclerosis in
Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010;68(2):198-204.
114. Yiu J, Miller WC, Eng JJ, Liu Y. Longitudinal analysis of balance
confidence in individuals with stroke using a multilevel model for
change. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(8):999-1006.
115. Kubina LA, Dubouloz CJ, Davis CG, Kessler D, Egan MY. The process
of re-engagement in personally valued activities during the two years
following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):
236-43.
117. Patton M. Integrating Theory and Practice. 4 ed: Sage Publications Inc;
2014.
* Seriens namn var tidigare (nr 1–24) ”Örebro Studies in Caring Sciences”.
10. Göransson, Katarina (2006) Registered nurse-led emergency
department triage: organisation, allocation of acuity ratings and
triage decision making.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
11. Eldh, Ann Catrine (2006) Patient participation – what it is and
what it is not.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
12. Isaksson, Ann-Kristin (2007) Chronic sorrow and quality of life in
patients with multiple sclerosis.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
13. Florin, Jan (2007) Patient participation in clinical decision making
in nursing – a collaborative effort between patients and nurses.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
14. Johansson, Agneta (2007) Adolescents’ perspective on mental
health and health-promoting dialogues.
Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
15. Frisk, Margot (2007) Asthma and respiratory symptoms related to
the housing environment.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Occupational
T herapy.
16. Forslund, Kerstin (2007) Challenges in prehospital emergency care –
patient, spouse and personnel perspectives.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
17. Odencrants, Sigrid (2008) The complexity of nutritional status for
persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – a nursing
challenge. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
18. Tollén, Anita (2008) Vardagen och förväntningar på dagrehabilitering
– en studie i äldre personers uppfattningar.
Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
19. Dwyer, Lise-Lotte (2008) Dignity in the end of life care – what does
it mean to older people and staff in nursing homes?
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
20. Lidskog, Marie (2008) Learning with, from and about each other:
Interprofessional education on a training ward in municipal care for
older persons. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
21. Tinnfält, Agneta (2008) Adolescents’ perspectives – on mental health,
being at risk, and promoting initiatives.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Public Health.
22. Carlsson, Eva (2009) Communication about eating difficulties after
stroke – from the perspectives of patients and professionals in health
care. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
23. Källström Karlsson, Inga-Lill (2009) Att leva nära döden. Patienters
och vårdpersonals erfarenheter inom hospicevård.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
24. Österlind, Jane (2009) När livsrummet krymper.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
25. Liedström, Elisabeth (2009) Experiences of Chronic Sorrow and
Quality of Life in Next of Kin of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
26. Petersson, Pia (2009) Att göra abstrakta begrepp och komplexa
situationer konkreta. En avhandling om deltagarbaserad aktions-
forskning i svensk vård och omsorg.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
27. James, Inger (2010) Bakom rutinerna. Kunskap och omvårdnads-
praxis i mänskliga gränssituationer.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
28. Thoroddsen, Ásta (2010) The role of standardised nursing languages
in representing nursing and supporting nurses as knowledge workers.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Nursing.
29. Pettersson, Camilla (2010) Parents’ Possibility to Prevent Underage
Drinking. Studies of Parents, a Parental Support Program,
and Adolescents in the Context of a National Program to Support
NGOs.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis with focus on Public Health.
30. Rydlo, Cecilia (2010) Fighting for the otherness. Student nurses’
lived experiences of growing in caring.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
31. Ek, Kristina (2010) Att leva med mycket svår kronisk obstruktiv
lungsjukdom – ett liv i slowmotion.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
32. Fröding, Karin (2011) Public Health, Neighbourhood Development,
and Participation. Research and Practice in four Swedish Partnership
Cities. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
33. Kollén, Lena (2011) Dizziness, balance and rehabilitiation in
vestibular disorders. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
34. Wallerstedt, Birgitta (2012) Utmaningar, utsatthet och stöd i palliativ
vård utanför specialistenheter. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
35. Ewertzon, Mats (2012) Familjemedlem till person med psykossjukdom:
bemötande och utanförskap i psykiatrisk vård.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
36. Fossum, Mariann (2012) Computerized Decision Support System in
Nursing Homes. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
37. Henriksson, Anette (2012) A support group programme for family
members: an intervention during ongoing palliative care.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
38. Hälleberg Nyman, Maria (2012) Urinary catheter policies for
short-term bladder drainage in hip surgery patients.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
39. Thorstensson, Stina (2012) Professional support in childbearing, a
challenging act of balance. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
40. Geidne, Susanna (2012) The Non-Governmental Organization as
a Health promoting Setting. Examples from Alcohol Prevention
Projects conducted in the Context of National Support to NGOs.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
41. Lidström Holmqvist, Kajsa (2012) Occupational therapy practice for
clients with cognitive impairment following acquired brain injury –
occupational therapists’ perspective.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
42. Tollén, Anita (2013): Äldre personers dagliga liv och betydelsen av
dagrehabilitering. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
43. Pajalic, Zada (2013): Matdistribution till hemmaboende äldre
personer ur flera perspektiv. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
44. Olsson, Annakarin (2013): Daily life of persons with dementia and
their spouses supported by a passive positioning alarm.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
45. Norell Pejner, Margaretha (2013): The bright side of life. Support in
municipal elderly home care. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
46. Karlsson, Ulf (2013): Arbetsterapeuters attityd till och uppfattning om
forskningsanvändning samt professionen ur ett manligt perspektiv.
Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
47. Salzmann-Erikson, Martin (2013): Caring in intensive psychiatry.
Rhythm and movements in a culture of stability.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
48. Lindner, Helen (2013): The Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric
Control. Psychometric evidence and comparison with upper limb
prosthetic outcome measures. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
49. Ohlsson-Nevo, Emma (2013): Colorectal cancer: Patients’ and next-
of-kin’s experiences and the effects of a psycho-educational program.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
50. Falk-Brynhildsen, Karin (2013): The effect of preoperative skin
preparation on bacterial growth during cardiac surgery.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
51. Jaensson, Maria (2013): Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness.
Clinical studies in patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
52. Elisabeth Liedström (2014): Life Situation as Next of Kin to Persons
in Need of Care: Chronic Sorrow, Burden and Quality of Life.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
53. Johansson, Anita (2014): Ändlös omsorg och utmätt hälsa:
Föräldraskapets paradoxer när ett vuxet barn har långvarig psykisk
sjukdom. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
54. Brobeck, Elisabeth (2014): Samtal som stöd för patienters
livsstilsförändringar: en viktig del av sjuksköterskans hälsofrämjande
arbete. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
55. Lindh, Marianne (2014): Adherence to hygiene routines in
community care – the perspective of medically responsible nurses in
Sweden. Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
56. Källstrand-Eriksson, Jeanette (2014): Being on the trail of ageing.
Functional visual ability and risk of falling in an increasingly ageing
population. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
57. Jonny Geidne (2014): Implementation and Sustainability in a Swedish
Setting Approach for Health Promotion-Research and Practice in
four Partnership Cities. Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/
Academic essay.
58. Ekwall, Eva (2009): Women’s Experiences of Gynecological Cancer
and Interaction with the Health Care System through Different Phases
of the Disease. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
59. Wätterbjörk, Inger (2014): Couples’ experiences of an information
model about prenatal screening. Decision-making and satisfaction.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
60. Ek, Bosse (2014): Prioritering vid utlarmning i prehospital vård.
Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
61. Dahlkvist, Eva (2015): The Garden/Patio in Residential Care
Facilities for Older People - Characteristics and the Users Perspectives.
Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
62. Faag, Carina (2015): A comprehensive nurse-led intervention for
patients with peripheral vestibular disorders: the feasibility and
benefits. Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
63. Biswas, Animesh (2015): Maternal and Neonatal Death Review
System to Improve Maternal and Neonatal Health Care Services in
Bangladesh. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
64. Islam, Farzana (2016): Quality Improvement System for Maternal
and Newborn Health Care Services at District and Sub-district
Hospitals in Bangladesh. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
65. Algilani, Samal (2016): ”To be at one’s best” -The evolution of Opti-
mal Functionality and its possible implementation in an ICT-platform.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
66. Fredriksson, Ingela (2016): Leisure-time youth-center as health-promotion
settings. Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic essay.
67. Larsson, Madelene (2016): Formal Female Mentoring Relationships as
Health Promotion. Vetenskaplig uppsats för licentiatexamen/Academic
essay.
68. Barzangi, Jir (2017): Infant Dental Enucleation in Sweden:
Perspectives on a Practice among Residents of Eastern African Origin.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
69. Hugelius, Karin (2017): Disaster response for recovery: survivors’
experiences, and the use of disaster radio to promote health after
natural disasters. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
70. Ewertsson, Mona (2017): Lärande av praktiska färdigheter inom
sjuksköterskeprofessionen-studier av lärande i olika arenor.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
71. Sundqvist, Ann-Sofie (2017): Perioperative patient advocacy – having
the patient’s best interests at heart. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
72. Rasoal, Dara (2017): Perspectives on Clinical Ethics Support and
Ethically Difficult Situations: Reflections and Experiences.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
73. Wistrand, Camilla (2017): Swedish operating room nurses´ preventive
interventions to reduce bacterial growth and surgical site infections,
and to increase comfort in patients undergoing surgery.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
74. Luhr, Kristina (2018): Patient Participation from the Patient’s
Preferences, That’s What Counts. Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.
75. Arvidsson Lindvall, Mialinn (2018): Physiotherapeutic perspectives
on balance control after stroke: exercises, experiences and measures.
Doktorsavhandling/Doctoral thesis.