Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
Scenario
The following program is targeted towards further supporting Numeracy as one of Bellfield
College’s identified priority areas for improvement by utilising a more systemically
integrated model. Stage 4 will be the primary focus group as it acts as the foundational years
for Secondary education and will provide the greatest long-term impact for the investment in
the program.
Over a 3-year period student numeracy skills will be developed and monitored utilising a
cycle of continuous improvement.
Teachers across all Key Learning Areas (KLAs) of the College’s Secondary school will be
connected to develop a Professional Learning Community (PLC) dedicated to implementing
coordinated inclusion of Numeracy as a cross-curriculum priority(Harris & Jones 2019). Staff
will be engaged in targeted professional development on a cyclical basis dependent upon
their own needs through research, collaboration with colleagues (including the STEM
department), and expert training - promoting teacher agency, capacity and confidence in
including numeracy (Averill & McRae, 2019; Gajda & Cravedi, 2006). Staff development
will follow a cycle of continuous improvement with term by term and yearly reviews as the
program progresses (Harris & Jones 2019).
Student capacity for numeracy will be developed through use of numeracy inclusions across
KLAs, numeracy skill catalogues for each subject area, implementation of the “Think Aloud”
strategy for mathematics, (Kani & Shahrill, 2015). Improved numeracy capacity will assist
students both in their future education and in long term life outcomes. Lack of numeracy
inhibits learning across KLAs including science, geography, history and music as students are
unable to access and comprehend concepts necessary to success in these disciplines
(Bennison, 2015; Blow et al. 2012; Quinnell et al. 2013). Likewise, higher capacity for
numeracy is predictive of better financial decision making, enabling students greater success
throughout adulthood (Graffeo et al., 2015). Further to this, increased numeracy of students
enables access to Bellfield’s compression Mathematics Advanced course in Stage 6,
promoting greater success in university and adulthood over those who take Mathematics
Standard or no maths (Manny et al., 2019).
Project Plan
(a) Goal of the action research project to be undertaken outside the faculty.
The aim of this action research project is to develop the Numeracy capacity of the Bellfield
College community by focused development of Stage 4 teachers and students.
The following goals have been defined:
The core of the project is developing a PLC dedicated to promoting a numerate College
community. This is a teacher-led project designed to promote teacher leadership, agency and
collaborative development around numeracy (Averill & McRae, 2019). Teacher quality is the
primary factor affecting student achievement that can be altered via intervention (Hattie,
2003). As such, Stage 4 teachers will be engaged in surveys, onboarding sessions and focus
groups to involve them personally within the project from the start to identify individual
professional development needs related to numeracy teaching within their KLAs, maximising
employee engagement and subsequent efficacy of the program (Harris & Jones 2019). Staff
training will be conducted prior to the implementation of the program to enable skill
development and application to developing teaching materials that include numeracy, Think
Alouds and multilingual scaffolding (Gajda & Cravedi, 2006). Throughout the program
further cyclical development will occur in annual and term-by-term increments via self-
directed staff research and further identification of professional learning needs following
program review milestones (Averill & McRae, 2019; Gajda & Cravedi, 2006).
Students will be coached through modelling, direct instruction and student-centred activities
in the “Think Aloud” strategy for problem solving to develop thinking, comprehension and
subsequent numeracy skills. Think Alouds emphasise verbalisation of cognition, improving
student capacity to articulate and analyse their own and others thinking as well as transfer this
comprehension to written answers (Fisher et al. 2011; Kani & Shahrill, 2015; Yusuf et al.
2018; Bernadowski, 2016). Teacher demonstration normalises use of Think Alouds whilst
also exposing students to the numeracy problem solving strategies of others which they may
adopt themselves (Bernadowski, 2016). This is especially effective in peer-teaching scenarios
where students rapidly share their thinking and understanding to generate a collective
problem-solving capacity as a class (Kani & Shahrill, 2015). This is particularly
advantageous for the highly social classroom dynamic found within the College’s student
population (Yusuf et al. 2018).
Multilingual scaffolding supports will be implemented to assist the large proportion of the
school population identified as LBOTE using designed and interactional scaffolding,
providing a spectrum of scaffolding based on student comprehension (Bakker et al., 2015;
Smit, 2013) . Posters in classrooms will provide explanations of KLA specific numeracy in
both English and Arabic to assist student comprehension, whilst tasks and diagrams which
require interpretation by students will be designed with Arabic and English, English-only and
no-text to support students according to their current ability - e.g. use of textual explanations
to support comprehension of graphs or diagrams (Bakker et al., 2015; Smit, 2013).
The project will utilise a mixed-methods approach to evaluating the efficacy of the project in
achieving its goals. As the project aims to evaluate both student and teacher development,
dual design research will be utilised (Gravemeijer & Eerde 2009).
Student comprehension of and capacity to solve Numeracy related problems will be assessed
through annual NAPLAN data (analysed through Scout), in-school assessments and term-by-
term testing of numeracy skills (Gaciu, 2020). Numeracy skill catalogues provide evidence of
progressive development of students across the program, whilst NAPLAN and in-school
assessment data provides statistics to compare students pre and post program implementation
(Jackson, 2020). Progression towards national average in NAPLAN numeracy testing will be
analysed using a t-test comparing actual student scores vs. predicted scores to determine
statistical significance (Jackson, 2020). Teacher competency and confidence in providing
numeracy inclusions across KLAs will be measured via pre and post project surveys as well
as yearly focus groups to evaluate progressive development.
Overall efficacy will be evaluated based upon the capacity of the program to achieve
progressive growth towards goals, not purely based on outright achievement of goals -
reflecting growth mindset practices.
(d) Outline the timeline for the project?
Pre-project teacher surveys will gather data on teacher confidence and competence
implementing numeracy in the classroom.
Staff onboarding will introduce Stage 4 staff to the project and subsequent focus
groups will enable teacher voice and ownership of the project by identifying current
teacher capabilities and areas for development. Training materials will be developed
as a result to be delivered to staff alongside training by external providers.
Staff training will be delivered late 2021, with time allotted for development and
integration of cross-curriculum numeracy materials into teaching programs for the
following year prior to commencement of the project.
The three-year teaching and testing period will begin with initial student diagnostics
to provide data to staff and allow students to catalogue their own numeracy capacities
in each KLA and track their learning.
At the end of every term, student numeracy development will be assessed via short
formal tests to update student numeracy skill catalogues and evaluate efficacy of
numeracy inclusions, Think Aloud and multilingual scaffolding across KLAs
Annual project evaluations and reviews occur with all staff to further engage in a
cycle of continuous improvement. Impact of project interventions will be assessed to
dictate further targeted research and staff development to be utilised in the following
year.
Project will conclude with post-project teacher surveys to gather final data regarding
development of teacher competence/confidence and staff will be debriefed
(e) How does this lead to a cycle of continuous improvement?
By instigating a PLC focused on the common goal of improving Stage 4 students’ numeracy
within this program a cycle of continuous improvement develops (Hargreaves & Fullan,
2012;Harris & Jones 2019). The pre-implementation phase consists of the onboarding of staff
with the teacher-led vision of the program, identifying areas for targeted improvement in
collaboration with teachers and actively engaging staff in self-determined professional
learning mirrors the Plan-Do-Evaluate-Act model for continuous improvement (Tichnor-
Wagner et al., 2017). Further to this, throughout the project are predetermined checkpoints
annually and by term enabling teachers to assess the efficacy of their individual and
collective pedagogy using clear quantitative data to identify and address further areas for
development (Harris & Jones, 2019; Hattie, 2003). The collaborative nature of a teacher-led
program within a PLC ensures optimal staff engagement coupled with long-term, cyclical
professional development. The PLC developed through this program will enable
collaboration across KLAs and form a basis for future programs to improve the school
community and solidify staff relations.
Reference List:
https://www.myschool.edu.au/school/
Averill, R., & McRae, H. (2019). Culturally Sustaining Initial Teacher Education: Developing
content/uploads/2020/08/2019-Bellfield-College-Annual-Report.pdf
Bennison, A. (2015). Supporting teachers to embed numeracy across the curriculum: a sociocultural
Bernadowski, C. (2016). "I can't "evn" get why she would make me "rite" in her class:" Using think-
alouds in middle school math for "at-risk" students. Middle School Journal, 47(4), 3-14.
Blow, F., Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2012). Time and chronology: Conjoined twins or distant cousins?
comprehension instruction and student reading achievement. The Teacher Educator, 46(3),
Gaciu, N. (2020). Understanding quantitative data in educational research (1st ed). SAGE
Publications.
Gajda, R., & Cravedi, L. (2006). Assimilating “Real” Teachers in Teacher Education: Benefits and
Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y
Harris, A. & Jones, M. (2019) Teacher leadership and educational change. School Leadership &
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school.
Hattie, J.A.C. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper
presented at the Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us ACER Research
http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4/
Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818
Jackson, C. J. (2020). The utility of NAPLAN for improving teaching and learning.[thesis]
https://doi.org/10.26199/0NCJ-M091
Kani, N., & Shahrill, M., (2015). Applying the Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving Strategy in
Manny, A., Tam, H., Lipka, R. & Yin, Z. (2019). Data Analysis: The impact of senior secondary
Quinnell, R., Thompson, R., & LeBard, R. (2013). It’s not maths; it’s science: Exploring thinking
doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.800598.
Taub, M., Sawyer, R., Smith, A., Rowe, J., Azevedo, R., & Lester, J. (2020). The agency effect: The
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103781
Tichnor-Wagner, A., Wachen, J., Cannata, M., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2017). Continuous improvement
9301-4
Yusuf, S., Nasir, C., & Rohiman, C. (2018). Using think-aloud method in teaching reading skill.