Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAY 2017
APPROVAL SHEET
Janrey F. Flores, Faye M. Mosuela, Jojo O. Napoles and Aihrisse Lyn G. Navat in
partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Bachelor in Public Administration
has been examined and passed on April 6, 2017 by the Thesis Committee composed of:
Accepted and approved in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
Bachelor in Public Administration.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Immeasurable appreciation and deepest gratitude for the help and support are
extended to the following persons who in one way or another have contributed in making
To Almighty God, for the wisdom bestowed upon the researchers, the strength,
To Prof. Allan Hil B. Pajimola, their Thesis Adviser, for his unending support,
piece of advice, guidance, valuable comments, and for sharing his knowledge and
Bayani, Prof. Tiffany Ruth Quinitip, and Prof. Mark Anthony C. Ochoa, for their
words of wisdom, encouragement and creative and comprehensive advice. Without their
support and supervision throughout the process of researching and writing this paper and
To the researchers’ family and friends, in giving an unconditional love and moral
JHLM
GLD
JFF
FMM
JON
ALGN
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
TITLE PAGE……………………………………….. i
……………………………
APPROVAL ii
SHEET……………………………………………………………..
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………………………………….. iii
LIST OF vi
TABLES………………………………………………………………..
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………… viii
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………....... ix
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
Situation Analysis………………………………………...…………... 1
Framework of the 6
Study……………………………………………….
Statement of the 11
Problem……………………………………………...
Definition of 11
Terms……………………………………………………
2 METHODOLOGY 13
Research Design……………………………………………………… 13
Sources of 14
Data………………………………………………………..
iv
Instrumentation and Data 15
Collection………………………………….
Analysis of Data……………………………………………………… 15
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Municipalities……………………………………..
B Legal Basis: Section 8 of RA 83
9845……………………………………….
C Questionnaire for Frontline 85
Officers……………………………………...
D Questionnaire for Clients………………………………………………… 88
E Request Letter to the Municipal 92
Mayors………………………………….
F Sample Forms being Given by Frontline 108
Officers………………………..
G Certificate of Appearance………………………………………………... 158
v
H Compliance to Section 8 (ARTA) per Municipality…………………….. 162
I Difficulties Encountered per 166
Municipality………………………………..
J Photo Evidences on Establishment of Public Assistance 176
Desk…………...
K Photo Evidences on No Noon Break Policy 180
Signage……………………...
L Inventory of Frontline Officers………………………………………….. 184
M Inventory for Documentary Analysis……………………………………. 187
CURRICULUM 193
VITAE………………………………………………………….
LIST OF TABLES
1 Distribution of Respondents…………………………………………… 14
2 Compliance in terms of Acceptance of Applications and 18
Requests…….
3 Compliance in terms of Action of 26
Office………………………………..
4 Compliance in terms of Denial of 29
Request……………………………...
5 Compliance in terms of Limitation of 31
Signatories………………………
vi
6 Compliance in terms of Adoption of Working 33
Schedules……………….
7 Compliance in terms of Identification 36
Card…………………………….
8 Compliance in terms of Establishment of Public/Complaints 37
Desk…….
9 Summary Table of Compliance of the 38
Municipalities………………….
10 Difficulties Encountered by the Frontline Officers in terms
of Acceptance of Applications and
Request……………………………. 40
11 Difficulties Encountered by the Frontline Officers in terms
of Action of office……………………………………………………... 44
12 Difficulties Encountered by the Frontline Officers in terms
of Denial of Request…………………………………………………… 45
13 Difficulties Encountered by the Frontline Officers in terms
of Limitation of Signatories…………………………………………… 48
14 Difficulties Encountered by the Frontline Officers in terms
of Adoption of Working Schedules……………………………………. 49
15 Difficulties Encountered by the Frontline Officers in terms
of Identification Card.............................................................................. 51
16 Difficulties Encountered by the Frontline Officers in terms 53
of Public/Complaints Desk......................................................................
17 Summary of the Highest Difficulties Encountered in Accessing
Frontline Services……………………………………………………… 54
18 Recommendation as Input to the Strategic Planning to the
Enhancement of Compliance on Accessing Frontline Services.............. 56
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
1 Research Paradigm…………………………………………………….. 10
viii
ABSTRACT
ix
Adviser: Allan Hil B. Pajimola, MPA
Republic Act No. 9485 or Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007 aims to reduce red tape and
expedite transactions in delivering public services in the government as a means to solve
the pervasive and long standing problem of corruption in the Philippines. This study
determined the extent of compliance and the difficulties encountered by the eight
Municipalities of the First District of La Union to the RA 9485 provision of Accessing
Frontline Services (Section 8). This descriptive research utilized questionnaire as the
main data gathering tool, with 162 frontline officers and 240 clients from the eight
municipalities and data were analyzed through weighted mean, frequency count and
percentage. Results revealed that municipalities are extremely compliant to the provision
of Section 8. The main difficulty encountered by the frontline officers is lack of
documents brought by the clients while the primary difficulty encountered by the clients
is the slow processing of denial of request.
--------------
Keywords: Accessing Frontline Services, Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007 (RA 9485),
Compliance, First District of La Union, Municipalities