Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JOHNL. JAMBOR
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waterlao, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3GI
JOHNE. DUTRZAC
CANMET,
Deparnnent Cananq555BoothStreet,Ottawa,OntariaKIA OGj
of Naaral Resources
ANDREW C. ROBERTS
Surveyof Cananq601BoothStreet,Otawa"OwariaKIA 088
Geological
JOELD. GRICE
Research of Naure,Ottatva,OntariaKIP 6P4
Divisiou CatadianMuseurn
JANT. SZYMA(SKI
CANMET,
Depamnent Canad4555BoothStreet,Ottawo"OntarioKIA 0GI
of NaturalResources
ABSTRA T
The new mineral clinoatacamiteis a polmorph of Cu2(OII)3C| othen are botallackite (monoclinic), atacamite(ortho-
rhornbic),an{ possiblyparatacamite(rhombohedral).Clinoatacaniteis monoclinic, spacegroupP21ln,a 6.157(2),b 6.814Q),
c 9.104(5) A, p 99.65(4)", which is transformableto a pseudorhombohedralcell approximating that of paxatacamite.
Clinoatacamitehasbeenfound in specimensfrom severallocalities,aadcoexistswith paratacamitein the holotypespecimenof
p,aralacamite. The two minerals are not readily distinguishedexceptby optical and X-ray methods:paratacamiteis uniaxial
negative,whereasclinoatacamiteis biaxht negative,2V@75(5f . Strongestlines of the X-ray powder paltern of clino-
aracamireld n A(D@k[)]are 5.47(100)(T0l,0Ll),2.887(40X121J03), 2.767(60)81.1),2.742Q0)(0r3,202),2.266(@)Q20),
2.243(50)(004),and L.7M(5Q82a,040). Clinoatacamiteis readily synthesizedand a seriesof experimentswas conductedto
promotethe uptakeof Zn and duplicatethe formula of the dubiousmineral "anarakite" (CuZn)2(OI{)3C1.Generally,products
with more than about6 mol%o"7iprovedto be hexagonal,i.e., nrcranpaatacamite, as did specimensof "anarakite"fron fhe
type locality. Holotype paratacamitecontains2-3 wtVo Zn, andit seemsthat r€placementof Cu by small amountsof another
cation, such as Ni or Zn, is eitler favorable or essentialto stabilizethe rhombohedral(pantacamit€)structure.The Powder
Diffraction File standardfor paratacamite(25-l4n) is that of clinoatacamiteratherthan paratacamite.
SoM:rteRs
* GeologicalSurveyof Canadaconnibutionnumber21695.
62 TIm cANADTANMrNERALocrsr
ItnonucnoN Pnnnrncal\ffre
Cu2(OII)3CI has been consideredto exist as the Paratacamiteis rhombohedral.The unit cell has
trimorphous minerals atacamite (orthorhombic), been determinedby single-crystalX-ray methodsby
paratacamite(rhombohedral),and botallackite (mono- Frondel(1950),Fleet (1975),and hing et al. (1987).
slinis), ths crystal stuctures of which have been Fleet's (1975) crystal-structurestudy showedthat tle
described by Wells (1949), Fleet (1975), and mineralhasa pronouncedsubcellwith a' = el2, c' = c,
Hawthome (1985), respectively.In addition to these apparent space-group Rim. T\e superstructure is
well-characterizedminernls,a syntheticphaseassigned developedby an orderedarangementof the substruc-
the sameformula was describedby Oswald& Guenter ture, and resultsin thq spacegroupR3 for the full cell
(1971)asparatacamite,andis recordedasparatacamite with a 13.65,c 14.04A. The supersffucturedimensions
in the Powder Diffraction File @DF 25-1427): thts were also obtainedby Frondel (1950) and Yrng et al.
syntheticphase,however,has a monoclinic cell rather (1e87).
than the rhombohedralcell ascribedto paratacamiteby
ooANAPrlI<TT'p"
Frondel(1950)andFleet(1975).
To the distinct Cu2(OII)3CI polymorphs, two of
which are monoclinic. should be added "anarakile" The specimensexaminedin this study are from the
(Cu,Zn)r(OII)3C1,which was describedby Adib & type locality of 'oanarakite", tb.eKali Kafi mine, Anarak
Ottemann(L972) as a new mineral from the Anarak Province,Iran. The specimenstudiedin the most detail
Province, han. They recognized the similarity to is from the Pinch collection @inch#508), now part of
paratacamite,but obtaineda monoclinic cell different the National Mineral Collection housed at tle
from thoseknown for Cu2(OII)3CI.In his abshactof CanadianMuseum of Nature, Ottawa, but material
the data for anarakite,Fleischer (1973) indicated the similar in appeamncewas obtained from the Royal
mingpl to be "probably = zincian paratacamite",and OntarioMuseum,Toronto(M35449), andthe National
subsequentlythe status was relegated to that of a Mineral Collectionhousedat the GeologicalSurveyof
discrediiedmineral (e.g.,Nickel & Mandarino1987). CanadaoOttawa OrMC 14654); all samples have
The X-ray powder-diffractionpatternof ooanarakite" aggregatesof small emerald-grcencrystals sprinkled
(PDF 25-325) is similar to that for rhombohedral on a distinctively ochreous-colored, thoroughly
paratacamite@rondel 1950; PDF 19-389), but there oxidized,limonite-pervadedporousmatrix.
are slight differencesfrom the datafor the monoclinic In their original description of "anarakiteo',Adib
synthetic phase as reported by Oswald & Guenter & Ottemam (1972) rcpotod the composition to be
(1971;PDF 25-l4n). Otherswho have investigated Cu 48.53, Zn I0,&, Cl 17.25,OH (by difference)
paratacamiteand the Cu2(OID3CIpolymorphs (e.9., 23.58 ,ut.%o.On the basis of Cu + Zn = 2. the results
Frondel 1950, Sharkey & Lewin 1971, Woods & correspond to (Cut.65ZD035XOII)2.eeClt.e5. Electon-
Garels 1986, Pollard et al, 1989) presumablyhave microprobe analysis of grains from tle Pinch
attributed these slight variations to the different specimen,mountedin polishedsection,gavea rangeof
leeslding techniques that have been used (e.g., compositions:Cu 48.9-53.7, Zn 4.2-8.7, Cl 16.0-
Debye-Scherrerand Guinier), or to the substitutional 16.3 vtt.%o. The most 7n-ich compositiotrcorresponds
effects of Zn in anarakile. Visual comparison of to (Cut.roZnor0)(Oll)2.e8c11.02, nnd the composition
Debye-Scherrer films of (Cu,Zn)2(OH[Cl from poorest in Zn is (Cu1.66Zne.1)(OH)2.eeC11.01.
Anarak and synthetic Cu2(OII)3CI prepared in our Debye-ScherrerX-ray pattems of the material are
laboratory also showed the patterns to be slightly sharpandwere consideredat the initiation of our study
different; this study was undertakento resolve the to be in fairly good agreementwith the data given by
observeddifferences,which intuitively did not seemto Adib & Ottemann(L972) for o'anarakite'n Clable 1). A
be in accord,uriththe effectsof Zn-for-Cu substitution. Guinier - de Wolffpattern taken with Co X-radiation
CLINOATACAMITE. A NEW POLYMORPH 63
65 5.476 s.&3 2.N 100 5.4 5.45 101 Lffi 5.A s.ql Ior,otr
<5 5.O3
15 4.697 4.&2 W2 N 4.69 4.6E 0G 30 4.68 4.6E 101
5 4.52 4.52 012 <5 4.y 4.53 110
10 3.42s 3.$0 ttr L5 3.424 3.416 110 n 3,M 3.M,3.&7 t2,gm
<5 3.019 3.019 104
m 2.fir 2.8W 220 n 2.8% 2.95 g)l & 2.EC7 2.W22.W2 L?L,',O3
1@ 2.755 2.759 gn 75 2.759 2.759 Ll3 @ 2.767 z.nl 11 _
15 2.139 2.741 M n 2.726 2.7?.6 2V2 7O 2.7A 2.739,2.736 0132s)
r0 2.713' 2.714 92,,
t0 2.U2 2.W 1r4 LO 2.U3 2.W W 20 2.339' 2.339 82
70 2.253 2.?6 222 6 2.263 2.262 gU @ 2.26t 2.26 nO
50 2.243t 22A q04
l0 2.215 2.215 4n <5 2,210 2.2@ 211 5 2.2AE 2.2W 2-Lr
10 2.M2 2.W N2 10 2.035 2.87 245 5 2.U5t 2.U9 301
10 2.V15 2.Br Lt4 t0 2.927t 2.V27 123
<5 1.930 1.931 116 1.940 310
ls t.w r,w2 n4 10 1.901 1.900 lW 5 1.907$1.S 301
10 1.895t 1.894 2_13
m Lw 1.828 6m 25 l.El7 1.817 033 20 1.817* 1.81E 231-
20 1.817 1.819 l0 1.807 1.809,1.806033,10s
<5 1.751 1.749 rE 1.74 Ztr
30 1.708 1.708 040 35 1.708 1.70E 22JJ 50 1.704 1.105,1.7A nA,W
<5 1.661 l.@ 527 <5 1.64 l.@ 321
s r.630 1.630131 s t.626 1.62t 223_
<5 1.601 1.& 2n 1.@1,r.@ l4L,!14
10 1.514 1.515 w2 7 1.509 1.509 208 s 1.51681.518,1.517M,!n
l0 1.50411.503,1.501nA, Ll
15 1.4!16 043 L0 1.494 1.493 217 10 L.Nl 1Af,9,1.M A3,L%
<5 1.471 1.471&1 s 1.471 1.4i11,1.467305,143
5 1.47 1.44? M2 5 l.us 1.447,1.46 Ul,Uz
5 1.420 1.419 !!9
10 1.384 6n $ 1.3E0 1.380 226 10 1.387* 1.386 42
5 t.m* Lm 242-
ro t.3o 1.31t3M l0 1.368 r.370,1.?68 92j,M
5 1.350 1.351 321 5 1.35641.357 w
<5 L.% l.w,L.y1 23/'051
<5 1.311 1.308045
rc r.no L269 0.2.10 L0 L.ny l.7ll 4n
s 1.2tr r.26r.1.2ffi M,0r7
rc 1.A4 Lz}s 143
14& vahH added!o the data of Adib & oemsm, using tleb mo@lhis sell a 11.901, b 6.830, c Lg'162L,
B 112.8f.
lZincisr Darataconit€roult obtalnedftom U4.54-lm Gadolff fln (Co nilhrim); idered vth hexrgoDalcel 4
6.832.'c L4.U2
6,592,1 Afor cotrq
L4.u2 Ator cotrct ndiadon 1.78S A).
A 1.?8m
ndiadon O A). Spctom fton rrll
S!€chrn from Ka6mhe'
KattKa8 mhe' ler11k P!ods,e' Irao
lerlak P!ods,e' Irao
n'mbigl$ushdedngwas
Refinrmr|ltbas€dm2?dffiacdorlin€sb(fwe€,!S.4z.uALfMAtotwhic,h
porslble.
ldltnosla€snite ftom Chlquic€nar8, Cbile (M3217O; U4.54-m Deby&Sc&frtet pad€rq Cofor' hdex€d sth 4
6.157, b 6.814, c 9.10/1L 0 S9.Of. Diftadiotr lin6 wth an asledsk w€fe ured for the rmtt-cel rcfiD€mfd.
Lire at 5.03 is assmed to be &e to alacamtle.
showed no broadening or multiple-line diffraction refined to a 6.832,c 14.042A 6alte 1). Although the
effects from Cu-Zn variation in a bulk sample.Two precession photographs showed no evidence of
inferencesemergedfrom these results: (a) what we the strong supercell that is typically present in
consideredto be the "anarakite-type"X-ray powder paratacamite,i,e., a = 2a', a 90-hour cone-a)ds
pattempersistsat relatively low Zn contents(ess than photographatong [100] confirmedthe presenceofthe
half that reported in the original paper), and (b) the supercell. The weaknessof relections attributed to
differencesin our powder patternsof ooanarakiteo' and the supercell suggeststhat the ordered arrangement
synthetic "paratacamite"@DF 23-947, 25-L42il) are of the substructuremay be affectedby the substitution
not the result of progessive shifts in diffraction lines, of Zn for Cu: nevertheless"the unit cell of the Anarak
suchas rnay occur in a solid-solutionseries. mineral is clearly that of a zincian rhombohedral
Single-crystalX-ray study of a minute fragmentof paratacamiteratherthanthat of the monoclinicmineml
the Pinch ooanarakite'',mounted about c*, Eave a describedby Adib & Ottemann(L972).
hexagonal cell with cell dimensions subsequently As was statedabove,the X-ray powderdatafor our
64
TABLB2 COMPARISON
OFTIIE UNITCELIS OFAI.{AMK[BA}.ID reactor to initiate the precipitation reaction.When all
SYNTIIETICOh(OlUCl
the NaOH solution had been added,the resulting hot
(Grzrxo.rl3cl Gr{oIUcl st/d€tic. slurry was filtered; the precipitate was washedwith
@M{lr}' syMC ffird3 water and was dried at 110'C prior to chemical
a(4) n.eol u.&3 ll.a analysisandmineralogicalstudy.Testvariablesfor the
,(4) 6.ao 6.W 5.W, synthesesincluded the concentrationsof the various
c(A) 10.162 6.166 10.103
p. 11257 130.62 nztv, metalions,the solutionpH, the ratio of NaOtI/il+, the
methodand rate ofreagent addition, and the effect of
lAdib& Ouemam QgrZZ),Ar8alsIt@ nifrateversuschloride an:ions.
qwld&GEtrs09l)
eam*ers of tle Osrald& Aleder(197t)cellatecwingdDtird(frdion For chemicalamlysis, the dried sampleswere dis-
ofKEsls & Pertlk0983) solvedin 1:1 HNO3and were diluted to an appropriate
volume. Concenfrationsof Cu, Zn, Ni, and Co were
determinedby atomic absorption spechoscopywith
matrix-matchedstandards.Chlorinewasdeterminedby
zincian pmatacamiteand that of o'anarakite"(Adib & high-pressure liquid chromatography and by ion-
Ottemann1972) arein fairly good agreemen!and the selective elecftodes,with the two methods yielding
several additional weaker lines recorded here for comparableresults.
the pattem of zincian paratacamite(Iable 1) can be X-ray-diffraction data for the synthetic CvZn
satisfactorilyindexedwith the monoclinic cell of Adib productswerecollectedmainly with a Rigakurotating-
& Ottemam. The major difference betweenthe two anodediffractometeroperatedat 55 kV, 180mA, using
pattemsis the appearanceof split-lines at d valuesof a curved-crystalgraphite monochromatorand CuKcr
2.M2-2.035 and 1.824-1.817A in the published radiation.Indexingandunit-ceil refinementutilized the
pattern of o'anarakite",and thesesplits are adequately program POWLS, a routine originally written by E.J.
indexedonly with the monoclinic cell. In their studyof Gabe and subsequentlymodified by J.T. Szymafski.
Zn-ich paratacamiteoKracher & Pertlik (1983) As only small quantitiesof materialwere availablefor
reportedthat they were unable to obtain the original some samples,all were mormtedq/ith acetoneon a
specimen of "anarakite', but they noted that the '2ero-background"plate scannedat4o 20 per minute,
unit cell of ooanarakite" can be transformedto that and all peak maxima were checked manually. An
of the monoclinic phase of Cur(OII)3Cl synthesized iterative procedurewas employedin the least-squares
by Oswald & Guenter (I97L). The Oswald & refinements,with severalcycles used in the progres-
Guenter(1971)phasehasa 11.83,b 6.822,c 6.1.66A, sion from low-angle intenselines to the higher-angle
P 130.62",and application of the Kracher & Pertlik lines. Special atiention was paid to peak widths, and
(1983)transformation-1 0 0/0 -1 0/1 0 2 gives a unit any lines showingbroadeningattributableto overlapof
ceUcloseto that of anarakiteClable 2). lines were disregardedin the final refinements.
In summary,our results indicated that the zincian
paratacamitefrom Anarak is rhombohedral,and only Effect of CUCI2concentration
the weaknessof the supercellreflectionsdistinguishes
it from previously reported rhombohedral panta- To define the preferredconcentrationofCuCl2 for
camite.Thus, the monoclinic cell reportedby Adib & the synthesis,200 mL of NaOH solutionwerepumped
Otteman(7972) for'oanamkite"remainedunexplained, at 100 ml/h into 200 mI of CuCl" solution heatedto
but type'onnarnkite" containsmoreZn thanwasfound 95"C. The CuCl2solutioninitially wasat its naturalpH
in the material examinedhere. Thus, we speculated value of approximately2, andthe CuCl2concentration
that the rcle of.Zn is possibly stucturally crucial, and was varied from 0.15 to 1,.0M; the molar ratio
this aspectwas accordingly examinedin a series of OH-/Cu2+wasfixed atunity in all the experiments.The
synthesisexperiments. productsmadefrom solutionscontaining0.5 or LA M
CuCl2were difficult to filter and containedgrainsof a
Snrnrss Pnocnpunss dark phase;the productswere subsequentlyshownby
AND ANALYTICAL Mgtnots X-ray-diffraction analysisto contain CUOin addition
to the monoclinic phaseof Crg(OII)3Cl as synthesized
All syntheseswere conductedusing reagent-grade by Oswald& Guenter(1971).By contrasLtheproducts
chemicals and the direct precipitation procedure synthesizedfrom the more dilule CuCl, solutions
outlinedby Sharkey& Lewin (LWD. A known volume consisted only of the monoclinic phase, containing
of solution containing appropriateconcentrationsof approximately6OVo Ct andl6VoCl [ideal Cu2(OII)3CI:
Ctrclz, ZnCl2, or Zn(NOr)2 was placed in a glass 64.l9VoCu, L6.60VoCl, 23.89 wt%o OlIl. A slight
reactor, which was heatedto 95'C to minimize the excessofwater wasrecordedin all ofthe analyseseven
possible formation of amorphousphases.A known thoughthe precipitateswere dried for 24hatl1"0"C. A
volume of NaOH solution at room temperaturewas relatively constant2.61.7 g of precipitatewereformed
pumped at a constantrate (<100 mlrh) into the hot for CuCl2concenftationsranglngfrom 0.15 tn 0.25M.
CLINOATACAMITE. A NBW POLYMORPH 65
Similarresultswereobtainedwhen0.154.25 M CuCL
solutionswere pumpedinto an equal concentrationoi
NaOH solution heatedto 95'C. On the basis of these
resuh$,most of the subsequent
experimentswere done oo t
a
by pumping NaOH solution into a 0.2 M C1rCl2 a a
solutionheatedto 95oC. o/oCu
"( e.e3
oo o
d
6.44 to 4r ^^t
TABLE3. SYI.{THB'fiC
(qr,Ar)b(Ott}ClSERIES
INDDGDWITH in mostsamples,severaldiffraction linesin thepatterns
HD(AGOMLCELL
are extraneousto the rhombohedralcell of parata-
Saryle Fsrula camite as grven by Frondel (1950). Theseexftaneous
nrmber o/oZn a (A) c(A) ThF lines were satisfactorilyindexablewith the 6eaqelinie
l-6 0 6.824(13) r4.0r7Qr) M
cell of Oswald& Guenter(1971).
AD2 r.9 6.Wt) 14.1070e) M Thus, the initial premise that the synthesisseries
44 L6 6.83{0 14.03(8) M would indicate a tansition from a Cu end-member
7 3.r 6.832(3) r4.04(8) M represented by paratacamite (rhombohedral) to a
45 4.0 6.83411) 14.0441) M
AD3 42 6,838(8) 14.0550o M potentiallymonoclinicZn-rich memberwasexactlythe
AD4 4.8 6.840(? 14.0630t M reverseof what was found, i.e,othe syntheticCu end-
Plo+ 62 6.840(D r4.04{3) H memberis monoclinic, and the Zn-ich membersare
PARA46 6.6 6.834(t v.uq7) M
Pl9 6,7 6.Sq4) 14.03{t M rhombohedral. The maximum Zn content of the
P8 7.4 6.835(8) 14.04q14) M synthetic series is 14.8 wt.%o,correspondingto
P51A 7.6 6.S9(t) 14.w,{2) H (Cur.sF"o.sd(OHLCl, which is higher than the Za
n0 7.8 14.051(3) content of ooanarakite"as described by Adib &
6.S9(l) tYt
P9 8.6 6.85(3) r4.04{0 M
w E.6 6.e8(1) r4os6(1) H Ottemann(1972). The poorer quality, as marked by
PA e.0 6.E39(l) r4.0qr) H increaseddiffirsenessof the X-ray patterns,of the two
P48 92 6.8ap) 14.061(4) H
P51B mostZn-rich samplesin the series(Fig. 4) suggeststlat
9,4 6.840(t) t4.vt3(2) H
P10 10.5 6.8410) 14.05(2) H the upper limit of Zn substitution in our synthetic
P5lC u,6 6.84q1) v.alz) H paratacamite(rhombohedral)may have been closely
P50 rz0 6,w2) M.s7q2) H approached.HoweveroKracher & Pertlik (1983)
P51D r18 6.E4ql) 14.w3Q) H
P49 13.5 6.838(3) r4.071(0 H obtained an electron-microprobeanalysis of parata-
P47 14.0 6.w7) 14.093(9) H camite from the Herminia mine, Chile, in which the
Dl<
t42 6.5a/J) l4.u79Q) Zn contentis L6.2wt.Vo;this zincian paratacamitewas
p3E r43 6.84?14) v,wa n
Pt2 15.0 6.8430) 14.056(3) H confirmed by them to be rhombohedral,spacegroup
P39
p<tF
16.3 6.84q1) 14.0rq3) H R3, with cell dimensionsas reportedby Fleet (1975).
16.6 6.84q3) r4.096(4) H The monoclinic synthetic phase seems to be less
PSIF r7.r 6.838(l) 14.6?12) H
P41 t7.E 6.U5Q) 14.094(3) H
tolerant of Zn incorporation,and the upper limit was
PA m.1 6.84qt) r4.086(3) H found to be about 9 wt.VoZn. In monoclinic samples
P36 28 6.W4) r4.0&(t H with Zn contentsin this range(P8, P9, P20; Table 3),
m1 ?49 6.W' 14.09r(10) H doubletdiffraction lines are close to merging,leading
M=monoclinig
H-heroConal to a more simple pattem that approachesthat of the
rhombohedralphase.
TABLB 4. UNIT CELIS OF CLINoATACAMIIE AND RELAIED Clr, (cu,zn), AND co PHASES
the "anarakite" cell nor Zn substitutioncould explarn dark greenishblack, lesscommonlygreenishblue. The
the observeddifferences,which were thought to exist morphologyvariesfrom simple,twinned pseudorhom-
at end-membercompositionsin naturalmaterial,it was bohedral grains up to 1 mm across,to complicated
concludedthat natural "paratacamite"exists in two intergrowths of euhedr4 exactly as for paratacamite
structurallydistinct forms. One of thesecorrespondsto and megascopicallyindistinguishable from it. The
the classicalrhombohedralform @alacheet al. l95L), luster is adamantine,but fine-grainedpowdery aggre-
which was sffucturally describedby Fleet (1975), and gates with a vitreous luster also occur. The mineral
the other correspondsto the monoclinis pfuasgsyn- is tansparent to translucent brittle, nonfluorescent,
thesized by Oswald & Guenter (i971) and Walter- H = 3, alridhas an evenfracture.A perfect cleavageis
Levy & Goreaud(1969; PDF 23-947, indexed with presenUthe cleavagefacewas checkedby a precession
hexagonalaxes).Without wishing to be repetitive,we X-ray photographand was determinedto be {012}.
reiteratethat the monoclinic unit cell of this synthetic Crystalsaregenerallytwinnedon (100).The calculated
phase differs from that of botallackite, but can be densityusing the ideal formula Cu2(OII)3CIard Z = 4
indirectly related to the monoclinic unit ceUthat was is 3.77 glcfr, which is similarto that of paratacamite.
derived by Adib & Ottemann(1972) for "anarakite" The measureddensitycould notbe determinedbecause
(Iable 4). The proposalthat the new monoclinicphase its value is too high for standardheavy liquids, and
be called clinoatacarnitehas been approvedby the becauseof the lack of abundantmaterial.This shortage
Commissionon New Minerals and Mineral Names, is relatedto the uncertainmegascopicdistinction from
International Mineralogical Association. The new paratacamite,andthe recognitionthat the two minerals
narne alludes to the difference in symmetry from coexist on individual specimens.The morphological
atacarniteand paratacamite.Clinoatacamitehas been similarity is highlighted by the knowledgethat clino-
found in specimensfrom severallocalities; the speci- atacamitecoexistswith paratacamitein the holotype
men designatedas tbe holotypeis from Chuquicamata, specimenof paratacamitefrom Sierra Gord4 Chile
Chile, andis part of the collectionof the Royal Ontario (The Natural History Museum,specimenBM 86958);
MuseumM32I76). this specimenwas one of several used by Frondel
(1950) in his descriptionof paratacamite,and was the
Crystallography source of the crystal used by Fleet (1975) for the
structue determinationof paratacamite.Thus, it was
Single-crystalX-ray sfudy of clinoatacamitewas deemednecessaryto deal with these minerals on a
dOne on a fragment from a specimen labeled as grain-by-grain basis rather than resorting to bulk
paratacamite,bench C-2, north en4 open-pit mine, samples.
Chuquicamata,Chile (M32176). Clinoatacamite is Clinoatacamitehas high indices of refraction, but
.6n6glinic, .space groupY2rlnoa 6.1"57(2), b 6.814(3), thesecould not be determinedbecauseof reactionwith
c 9.lM(5) A, B 99.65(4)oas refined from the X-ray the immersionliquids. The mineral is biaxiat negative,
powderpatterngiven in Table 1.No superstructure was 2V* = 75(5)",zvcdc= 69(3)" by extinctioncurves.
observed,and the structure was resolved to residual Dispersion is strong, r << vi orientation is X = bo
indicesR = 5.2 andR- = 4.9Eo.Details of the structure Y:a = 10", in obtuse augle p. No pleochroism was
arepresentedin a companionpaper(Griceet al. 1996). observed.The optical propertiesof clinoatacamitethus
All Cu-octahedrain clinoatacamitedisplayJahn-Teller are distinct from those of paratacamite.Paratacamite,
distortion. however,has alsobeenreportedto be biaxial, with2V
The syntheticphasepreparedby Oswald& Guenter up to about50oand r > v @rondelL9i0,Pa[acheet al.
(1971) was describedby them as monoclinic, space 1951).Adib & Ottemann(L972)reportedo'anarnkireo'
groupY21la,a 11.83(1),b 6.822(3),c 6.166(l A, to be biaxial positive,2V = 40o,no 1.842,n" 1.849,
p 130.62(3f. T\s cell can be reducedto a 6.166, pleochroic from green to grass green. Our optical
b 6.822, c 9.lL 4., P 99.77o,spacegroup Y21ln;in examination of zincian paratacamite from Anarak
comparison,the cell derived from the single-crystal showsthat the crystal aggregatesconsistof hexagonal
structurestudyof clinoatacamite gavea 6.IM, b 6.805, platesabout 10 Fm across,n > 1.800,nonpleochroic,
c 9.112A, p 99.55".Transformation of thelattercell to uniaxial negative,but with somegrains giving biaxial
show the relationship to paratacamite gives a figureswith a 2V of about5o.
pseudohexagonalcell with a 13.610, b L3.626, The opticalpropertiesreportedbyAdib & Ottemann
c 14.031A, u 89.47",B 90.00', y t19.96";thus,a is (1972) for "anarakiteo'are similar to thosereportedby
equal to 13.6 and c is equal to 14.03A, and both are Frondel (1950) for '"biaxial paratacamite"from the
similar to thoseof paratacamite(Iable 4). SierraGordamine, Chile (BM 86958).As our exami-
nationof the samespecimen(BM 86958)revealedthat
Pltysical and optical propenies it contains both zincian paratacamite and ctno-
atacamite,we irfer that tle "biaxial paratacamite"
Clinoatacamitehas been found on specimensfrom observedby Frondel (1950) is clinoatacamite.This
several localities. The mineral varies from sleen to inferenceis further supportedby our re-examinationof
CLINOATACAMITE. A NEW POLYMORPH 69
a cotypespecimenof "paratacarnite"from Remolinos, specimens,such as those from Sierra Gorda and the
Chile (USNM 95L46), which also was used in the holotype from Chuquicamata, all three minerals
descriptionof paratacamiteby Frondel(1950).Energy- coexist.
dispersionanalysesof thirteen grains confirmed them The relative stabilitiesof atacamiteandparatacamite
to be Zn-free,asreportedin Frondel(1950),but X-ray- have been widely discussed,most recently by Woods
diffraction patlerns of four grains showed all to be & Garrels(1986),Pollardet al. (1989),Buruzovaet al.
clinoatacamiterather fhan paratacamite.Nevertleless, (1989),and Hannington(1993).Pollardet al. (1989)
various discrepanciesin the optical propertiesremain concludedthat paratacamiteis the thermodynamically
unexplainsd;most notableis that rvefind paratacamite stable phase at ambient temperatures.It is possible,
to be uniaxial negative,whereasthe sign is reportedas however,that the phasesynthesizedby Pollard et al.
uniaxial positive in Palacheet al. (L95L). was clinoatacamiteratherthanparatacamite,exactlyas
was the case in the experimentsby Walter-Irvy &
Composition Goreaud(1969), Oswald & Guenter(L97I), Sharkey
& Lewin (I97I), and in this study. There is general
Electron-microprobeanalysesof grains from the agreementthat botallackite,which is of limited natural
Chuquicamata specimen M32176) were obtained occurence, is metastablewith respect to the other
using a JEOL 733 instrumentoperatedat 13 kV, with a Cu2(OH)3Clpolymorphs. Of ttrese, atacamite is
ZAF correctionprogramand CuS (Cu) and NaCl (Cl) probably the most widespreadin geological occur-
as standards.Zinc and Ni were not detected.The rence.
mean analytical results (and ranges) are:.CuO 74.7
(73.4-76.0),Cl 16.5(L5.7-17.2),(HzO)"a"13.5,sum SussrrnffIoNs oF Co ANDNi ron Cu
1M.7, lessO = Cl 3.7,total 101.0wt.Vo.T\eempirical
formulafor O + Cl = 4 is Cu1.e6O3.6H3.1rClo.r,ideally In the experimentalstudies concerningZn substi-
Cu2(OII)3CI. The latterrequiresO.rO74.49,Cl 16.60, tution, it was showntlat partial solid-solutionoccursin
H2O 12.66, sum 103.75,less O = Cl 3.75, total clinoatacamite,and more extensivelyin paratacamite.
L00 tut.Vo. The supercellreflections in zincian paratacamiteare
extremely weak, and unless special precautions
Distribution are taken to detect the full -cell, the apparentcell
correspondsto a 6.8, c L4.0 4,, possible space-group
Clinoatacamite from Chuquicamata, Chile R3rz. Rhombohedralcompounds with these cell
(M32176), occurs with atacamite, paratacamite, dimensionsand space grotp R1m are known as the
gypsum, and alunite on a quanzose matrix. synthetic phases Fe2(OH)3C1,Mn2(OH)3C1,and
Clinoatacamitealso was found in a specimenfrom Co2(OH)3C1.In his description of the structure of
Calumet Michigan (ROM, M26081), from Mason Co2(OH)3C1,de Wolff (1953) suggested that
Pass, Lyon County, Nevada (Cureton 4731), ftom Cu2(OH)3Clmight also be included in this structural
Chuquicamata"Chile @inch 508), from Sierra Gorda fype. This possibility was accordingly eaaminedia a
mine, Chile @M 86958),fromWallaces Gully, Mount seriesof synthesisexperiments.
Painter, South Ausralia (South Australian Museum
G13208), from Wallaroo mines, Kadina, South Co-4 u synthesisexperiments
Australia (South Australian Museum G11409), and
from Remolinos,Chile (USNM 951"46).Three speci- Co2(OII)3CIwas synthesizedby pumping 200 mL
mensfrom the type locality for "anarakite" (Kali Kafi of 0.2 M NaOH solution at 25 mI-Jhinto 200 mI . of
mine, Anarak Province,Iran), but obtainedfrom tbree O.2M CoCl2mediumheld at 95oC.The X-ray pattem
different sources (ROM M35,149;National Mineral of the precipitateis distinct from that of paratacamite,
Collection NMC 14654; Pinch collection "zincro- and is in good agreementwith the powder data given
sasite") proved to be paratacamite. Additional by de Wolff (1953)for Co2(OII)3CI.
specimensthat proved to be paratacamiteare from The effect of the concentation of CoCl2 on the
Churchill Buttes, Lyon Counfy, Nevada (M23078), synthesisof Cu2(OII)3CIwasinvestigatedby adjusting
from Levantmine, Comwall, England@132265),from the 0.2 M Cuclz medium to 0.2 M (CoCl2 + Cuclr.
Nangeroo mine, Murrin Murrin, Westem Australia That is. the Cu concentation of the solution decreased
0433193), from the Carr Boyd nickel mine, Westem as the Co concentration increased. Increasing the
Ausfialia (unnumberd Curetou),and from the Otter CoCl2concentrationfrom 0.0 to 0.05Mhad little effect
Shoot,Kambalda WestemAustralia (SouthAustralian on the composition of the products; the Cu content
Museum G12245). The Carr Boyd and Otter Shoot was approximately 57Vo, and the Co content was
specimensgave slightly different X-ray patterns,and consislently less than L wt.Vo.Increasing the CoCl2
provedto be nickeliferous. concentrationto greaterthan0.05M, with concomitant
The above study shows that atacamitecommonly reductionsin the CuCl2concentrations,causeda linear
coexistswith paratacamiteandclinoatacamite.In some increase in the Co content of the products and a
70 TIIE CANADIAN MINERALOGIST
/**
J
n /
O
C) z /
5
o a
s x
920
5ro
o
lCoClzl(mol/L)
7\ lNiClrl (mol/L)
0.20
Ftc. 5. Compositionsof the productsobtainedby addition of Ftc. 6. Compositionsof products obtained by addition of
0.2 M NaOH to 0.2 M (orICI"+ CoCl). 0.2 M NaOH to 0.2 M (CtCl2 + NiCl).
CoNctusroNs ACKNowl-mGHuH{Ts
BurtzovA, G.Yu., Srrmsrsm.c, L.YE., VonoNnr,B.I. & PALAcTD,C., BmuaN, H. & Fnol.oaL C. (1951): TheSystern
Gon'rove, N.V. (1989):Atacamitein metalliferoussedi- of Mineralogy 2. JobnWiley & Sons,New York, N.Y.
mentsof the Atlantic.Dokl. Eanh Sci.3(D.158-161.
PoLARD,A.M., Tuouas, R.G. & Wn:,teus, P.A. (1989):
EFFE\tsm.cE&H. (1989): An uncommon Cut2{lou coor- Synthesisand stabilitie,sof the basic copper(tr) ctilorides
dination polyhedron in the crystal structure of atacamite,paraacamite and botallackite. Mineral, Mag.
KCu3(OH)r[(AsO)H(AsOf] (with a comparison to s3,5s7-563.
relatedstructuretypes).Z Krtstallogr. l8E, 43-56.
PRnrc, A., Sr.row, M.R. & TIEK$rK, E.R.T. (1987):
FLE-I, M.E. (1975): The crystal structue of paratacamite, from Soutl Australia.Trans. Roy.Soc.South
Paratacamite
Cu2(OH\Cl. Acta Crysullogr. B3l, 183-187. Aust.3,123-1,28.
FLe$cHR, M. (193): New mineral names,Am MineraL SS, SHARIGI,J.B. & LswN, S.Z. (1971): Conditionsgoveming
560-562. the formation of atacamiteandparatacamite
. Am Mfueral,
56,t79-t92.
FRoNDEL,C. (1950):On paratacamiteandsomerelatedcopper
chlorides.Mineral. Mag. 29, 3445. Surq G.F.H. (1906): Paratacamite,a new oxychloride of
copper.Mineral,Mag.14, 170-177.
HaNN${crol.I, M.D. (1993): The formation of atacamite
during weathering of sulfides on tle modern seafloor. War,rsn-Luw, L. & GoREAUD, M. (1969): Sur la formation
Can. M ineral. 31. 945-956. des chloruresbasiquescuivriquesen solution aqueusede
25 t2A0"C. Bull. Soc.Chim.France1969(8),2623-2634.
Hawrnomm, F.C. (1985):Refinementof the crystal structure
of botallackite.Mineral. Mag 49, 87-89. Wnr,rs,A.F. (1949):The crystalstructue of atacamiteandthe
crystal chemistryof cupric compounds.Actd Crystallogr.
KRAcrrm.,A. & Pnnn-rc,F. (1983): Znkreicher Paratacamil 2. 175-180.
Cu3Zn(OID6C12, aus der Herminia Ming Siena Gord4
&ile. Ann.Nanrhist. Mus. Wien85l*,93-97. DE WoLFF,P.M. (1953): Crystal strucfre of Co2(OII)3C1.
Acta Crystallogr. 6, 359-360.
NrcKa, E.H., Gorn, J.F,M. & Ganrnq:,, B.J. (1994):
Secondarynickel mineralsfrom Widgiemoolth4 lVestern Woons, T.L. & Gannss, R.M. (1986):Phaserelationsof
A:astraha.
Mbural. Rec. 25, 283-291.,302. some cupric hydroxy minerals. Econ, Geol. 81,
1989-20W.
& MaNpanwo, J.A. (1987): Proceduresinvolving
the IMA Commission on New Minerals and Mineral
Names, and guidelines on mineral nomenclature.Caa
Mineral.?5.353-377.