References

Barral, O., Aranyi, G., Kouider, S., Lindsay, A., Prins, H., Ahmed, I., Jacucci, G.
, Negri, P., Gamberini,

L., Pizzi, D., & Cavazza, M. (2014). Covert persuasive technologies: bringing subliminal cues to human-
computer interaction: 9th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2014, Padua, Italy, May 21-23, 2014.
Proceedings. In Persuasive Technology (pp. -) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_1
1. .
Sidis, B.: The psychology of suggestion. D. Appleton, New York

(1898)Google Scholar
2. 2.
Fox, R., Herrmann, J.: Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry

alternations. Perception & Psychophysics 2, 432–436
(1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. 3.
Almeida, J., Mahon, B.Z., Nakayama, K., Caramazza, A.: Unconscious

processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 15214–15218
4. 4.
Breitmeyer, B.G., Ganz, L.: Implications of sustained and transient

channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and
information processing. Psychological Review 83, 1–36
5. 5.
Bouma, H.: Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Nature 226, 177–178 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. 6.
Levi, D.M.: Crowding–an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a

mini-review. Vision Research 48, 635–654 (2008)CrossRefGoogle
Scholar
7. 7.
Pelli, D.G., Tillman, K.A.: The uncrowded window of object recognition.

Nature Neuroscience 11, 1129–1135 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. 8.
Whitney, D., Levi, D.M.: Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on
conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences 15, 160–168 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. 9.
Kouider, S., Berthet, V., Faivre, N.: Preference is biased by crowded facial
expressions. Psychological Science 22(2), 184–189 (2011)CrossRefGoogle
Scholar
10. 10.
Bonneh, Y.S., Cooperman, A., Sagi, D.: Motion-induced blindness in

normal observers. Nature 411, 798–801 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. 11.
Neisser, U.: The control of information pickup in selective looking. In:

Pick, A.D. (ed.) Perception and Its Development: A Tribute to Eleanor
Gibson, pp. 201–219 (1979)Google Scholar
12. 12.
Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F.: Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional

blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28, 1059–1074
13. 13.
Rensink, R.A., O’Regan, J.K., Clark, J.J.: To See or not to See: The Need
for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science 8,
368–373 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. 14.
Simons, D.J., Levin, T.: Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1,

261–267 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. 15.
Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.L., Arnell, K.M.: Temporary suppression of

visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 849–
860 (1992)Google Scholar
16. 16.
Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J., Taylor, D.E.: Automatic phonological
priming in visual word recognition. Memory Cognition 10, 576–590
17. 17.
Kunst-Wilson, W.R., Zajonc, R.B.: Affective discrimination of stimuli that

cannot be recognized. Science 207, 557–558 (1980)CrossRefGoogle
Scholar
18. 18.
Faivre, N., Berthet, V., Kouider, S.: Nonconscious influences from

emotional faces: a comparison of visual crowding, masking, and
continuous flash suppression. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 129
19. 19.
Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., Burrows, L.: Automaticity of social behavior: direct
effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology 71, 230–244 (1996)CrossRefGoogle
Scholar
20. 20.
Devine, P.G.: Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled

components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, 5–18
21. 21.
Strahan, E.J., Spencer, S.J., Zanna, M.P.: Subliminal priming and

persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology 38, 556–568 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-References
Aarts, H., Chartrand, T., Custers, R., Danner, U., Dik, G., Jefferis, V., et al. (2005). Social stereotypes and
automatic goal pursuit. Social Cognition, 23, 465–490.
Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Marien, H. (2008). Preparing and motivating behavior outside of awareness.
Science, 319, 1639.
Abrams, R. (2008). Influence of category size and target set size on unconscious priming by novel words.
Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 189–194.
Bargh, J. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In E. T. Higgins & R.
M. Sorrentino (Eds.). Handbook of motivation and
cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 93–130). New York: Guilford Press.
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trotschel, R. (2001). The automated will:
Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.
Bermeitinger, C., Goelz, R., Johr, N., Neumann, M., Ecker, U. K. H., & Doerr, R. (2009). The hidden
persuaders break into the tired brain. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 45(2), 320–326.
Bijleveld, E., Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2010). Unconscious reward cues increase invested effort, but do not
change speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Cognition, 115,
330–335.
Bijleveld, E., Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2011). Once the money is in sight: Distinctive effects of conscious
and unconscious rewards on task performance. Journal
of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 865–869.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of social information processing goals:
Nonconscious priming reproduces effects of explicit
conscious instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478.
Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2010). The unconscious will: How the pursuit of goals operates outside of
conscious awareness. Science, 329, 47–50.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998).
Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395,
597–600.
Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and
subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in
Cognitive Science, 10(5), 204–211.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2010). Goals, attention, and (Un)Consciousness. Annual Review of
Psychology, 16, 467–490.
Eitam, B., Hassin, R., & Schul, Y. (2008). Nonconscious goal pursuit in novel environments: The case of
implicit learning. Psychological Science, 19(3),
261–267.
Eitam, B., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a representation
(ROAR) as a new framework. Personality and Social
Psychology Compass, 4(10), 951–967.
Eriksen, C. W. (1960). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and
evaluation. Psychological Review, 67, 279–300.
Ferguson, M. (2008). On becoming ready to pursue a goal you don’t know you have: Effects of
nonconscious goals on evaluative readiness. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1268–1294.
Ferguson, M., & Bargh, J. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5),
557–572.
Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A. (2003). Leading us not unto temptation: Momentary
allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296–309.
Fitzsimons, M., & Bargh, J. (2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals
associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 84, 148–164.
Forster, K. I. (2004). Category size revisited: Frequency and masked priming effects in semantic
categorization. Brain and Language, 90, 276–286.
Greenwald, A., Klinger, M., & Schuh, E. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible (‘‘subliminal”)
stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious
cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 22–42.
Hassin, R. T., Aarts, H., Eitam, B., Custers, R., & Kleiman, T. (2009a). Non-conscious goal pursuit and the
effortful control of behavior. In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh,
& P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 549–566). New York: Oxford University
Press.
Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., & Zimerman, S. (2009b). Automatic and flexible: The case of nonconscious goal
pursuit. Social Cognition, 27, 20–36.
Higgins, E. T. (2011). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Higgins, E. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.). (2000). Motivational science. Social and personality
perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal
vision, and visual masking: A survey and
appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1–23.

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Karremans, J., Stroebe, W., & Clauss, J. (2006). Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal
priming and brand choice. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 42, 792–798.
Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., & Hoffmann, J. (2006a). Priming from novel masked stimuli depends on
target set size. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(1),
37–45.
Kiesel, A., Wagener, A., Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., & Fallgatter, A. (2006b). Unconscious manipulation of
free choice in humans. Christian Consciousness and
Cognition: An International Journal, 15(2), 397–408.
Kinoshita, S., & Hunt, L. (2008). RT distribution analysis of category congruence effects with masked
primes. Memory and Cognition, 36(7), 1324–1334.
Klauer, K., Eder, A., Greenwald, A., & Abrams, R. (2007). Priming of semantic classifications by novel
subliminal prime words. Consciousness and Cognition: An
International Journal, 16(1), 63–83.
Klapp, S., & Haas, B. (2005). Non-conscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited
to concrete stimulus–response associations. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 193–209.
Kleiman, T., & Hassin, R. (2011). Non-conscious goal conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
47(3), 521–532.
Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review
of visual masking. Philosophical Transaction of the
Royal Society: B.
Kunimoto, C., Miller, J., & Pashler, H. (2001). Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination
responses. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 294.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Goals as knowledge structures. In P. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The
psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to
behavior (pp. 599–618). NY: Guilford.
Levy, B., Ariely, D., Mazar, N., Chi, W., Lukas, S., & Elman, I. (2008). Gender differences in the
motivational processing of facial beauty. Learning and
Motivation, 39, 136–145.
Merikle, P. M., & Daneman, M. (2000). Conscious vs. unconscious perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),
The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.,
pp. 1295–1303). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli.
Cognition, 80, 223–237.
Pratkanis, A. R. (1992). The cargo-cult science of subliminal persuasion. Skeptical Inquirer, 16, 260–272.
Pratte, M., & Rouder, J. (2009). A task-difficulty artifact in subliminal priming. Attention, Perception, and
Psychophysics, 71, 1276–1283.
Reingold, E., & Merikle, P. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without
awareness. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 563–575.
Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2004). Masked prime stimuli can bias ‘‘free” choices between response
alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(3),
463–468.
Shidlovski, D., & Hassin, R. (2011). When pooping babies become more appealing: The effects of
nonconscious goal pursuit on experienced emotions.
Psychological Science, 22(11), 1381–1385.
Strahan, E., Spencer, S., & Zanna, M. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is
hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38,
556–558.
Van den Bussche, W., den Noortgate, Van., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: A
meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 452–477.
1240 M. Milyavsky et al. / Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2012) 1232–1241
Veltkamp, M., Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2011). Motivating consumer behavior by subliminal conditioning
in the absence of basic needs: Striking even while
the iron is cold. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 49–56.
Winkielman, P., Berridge, K., & Wilbarger, J. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy
versus angry faces influence consumption behavior
and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 121–135.
-References
Andersen, S.A., G.B. Moskowitz, I.V Blair, and B.A. Nosek. 2007. Automatic
thought. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd edition,
ed. by E.T. Higgins and A. Kruglanski, 138–175. New York: Guilford.
Bargh, J.A. 2002. Losing consciousness: Automatic influences on consumer
judgment, behavior, and motivation. Journal of Consumer Research

29(3):280–285.
———. 2006. What have we been priming all of these years? On the development, mechanisms, and
ecology of nonconscious social behavior.
European Journal of Social Psychology 36(2):147–168.
Bargh, J.A., and T. L. Chartrand. 2000. The mind in the middle: A practical
guild to priming and automaticity research. In Handbook of Research
Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, ed. by H.T. Reis and C.M.
Judd, 253–285. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bargh, J.A., M. Chen, and L. Burrows. 1996. Automaticity of social behavior:
Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(2):230–244.
Beatty, S.E., and D. Hawkins. 1989. Subliminal stimulation: Some new data
and interpretation. Journal of Advertising 18(3):4–8.
Carey, B. 2007. Who’s minding the mind? New York Times, August 30.
Available online at www.nytimes.com.
Cooper, J., and G. Cooper. 2002. Subliminal motivation: A story revisited.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(11):2213–2227.
Dehaene S., and L. Naccache. 2006. Can one suppress subliminal words?
Neuron 52(3):397–399.
Dijksterhuis, A., H. Aarts, and P.K. Smith. 2005. The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion
and other potential applications. In The
New Unconscious, ed. by R. Hassin, J.S. Uleman, and J.A. Bargh, 77–106.
New York: Oxford.
Dijksterhuis, A., T. L. Chartrand, and H. Aarts. 2007. Effects of priming and
perception on social behavior and goal pursuit. In Social Psychology and the
Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes, ed. by J.A. Bargh,
51–131. New York: Psychology Press.
Dijksterhuis, A., J.A. Bargh, and J. Miedema. 2000. Of men and mackerels:
Attention, subjective experience, and automatic social behavior. In The

Message Within: The Role of Subjective in Social Cognition and Behavior, ed.
by H. Bless and J.P. Forgas, 37–51. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Dijksterhuis, A., P.K. Smith, R.B. van Baaren, and D.H.J. Wigboldus. 2005.
The unconscious consumer: Effects of environment on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer

Psychology 15(3):193–202.
Dijksterhuis, A., R. Spears, T. Postmes, D.A. Stapel, W. Koomen, A. van
Knippenberg, and D. Scheepers. 1998. Seeing one thing and doing
another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology 75(4):862–871.
Devine, P.G. 1989. Stereotype and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled
components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(1): 5–18.
Epley, N., K. Savitsky, and R.A. Kachelski. 1999. What every skeptic should
know about subliminal persuasion. SKEPTICAL INQUIRER 23(5):40–45, 58.
Glaser, J., and J.F. Kihlstrom. 2005. Compensatory Automaticity: Unconscious volition is not an
oxymoron. In The new unconscious, ed. by R.
Hassin, J.S. Uleman, and J.A. Bargh, 171–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenwald, A.G., E.R. Spangenberg, A.R. Pratkanis, and J. Eskenazi. 1991.
Double blind tests of subliminal self-help audiotapes. Psychological Science
2(2):119–122.
Karremans, J.C., W. Stroebe, and J. Claus. 2006. Beyond Vicary’s fantasies:
The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
42(6):792–798.
Macrae, C.N., and L. Johnston. 1998. Help, I need somebody: Automatic
action and inaction. Social Cognition 16(4):400–417.
Mather, R.D., and A. Romo 2007. Automaticity and Cognitive Control in
Social Behavior. Southlake, TX: Fountainhead Press.
Moore, T.E. 1992. Subliminal perception: Facts and fallacies. SKEPTICAL
INQUIRER 16(3):273–281.
Nisbett, R.E., and T.D. Wilson. 1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal
reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84(3):231–259.

Phelps, E.A. 2006. Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the
human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology 24(57):27–53.
Pratkanis, A.R. 1992. The cargo-cult science of subliminal persuasion.
SKEPTICAL INQUIRER 16(3):261–272.
Pratkanis, A.R., and E. Aronson. 2001. Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use
and Abuse of Persuasion. New York: Henry Holt and Company LLC.
Randolph-Seng, B., and M.E. Nielsen. 2007. Honesty: One effect of primed
religious representations. The International Journal for the Psychology of
Religion 17(4):303–315.
Satpute, A.B., and M.D. Lieberman. 2006. Integrating automatic and controlled processing into
neurocognitive models of social cognition. Brain
Research 1079:86–97.
Strahan, E.J., S.J. Spencer, and M.P. Zanna. 2002. Subliminal priming and
persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology 38(6):556–568.
Vallacher, R.R., and D.M. Wegner. 1987. What do people think they’re
doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review
94(1):3–15.
Wegner, D.M. 2005. Who is the controller of controlled processes? In The
New Unconscious, ed. by R. Hassin, J.S. Uleman, and J.A. Bargh, 19–36.
New York: Oxford University Press.
References
Balay, J. & Shevrin, H. (1988). The subliminal psychodynamic activation method: a critical review.
American
Psychologist, 43(3), 161-174.
Barber, T. X. & Calverley, D. S. (1963). „Hypnotic-like“ suggestibility in children and adults. Journal of
Abnormal & Social Psychology, 66(6), 589-597.
Begg, I. M., Needham, D. R. & Bokkbinder, M. (1993). Do backward messages unconsciously affect
listeners?
No. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(1), 1-14.

Benes, K. M., Gutkin, T. B. & Decker, T. N. (1990). The effects of mellow and frenetic music on reported
cognitions resulting from auditory subliminal messages. Journal of General Psychology, 117(1), 83-89.
Benoit, S. C. & Thomas, R. L. (1992). The influence of expectancy in subliminal perception experiments.
Journal of General Psychology, 119(4), 335-341.
Bjorklund, D. F., Cassel, W. S., Bjorklund, B. R. & Brown, R. D. (2000). Social demand characteristics in
children‘s and adults‘ eyewitness memory and suggestibility: the effect of different interviewers on free
recall and recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(5), 421-433.
Borgeat, F. (1989). Psychophysiological responses to subliminal auditory suggestions for activation.

Perceptual
& Motor Skills, 69(3, Pt 1), 947-953.
Borgeat, F., Elie, R., Chaloult, L. & Chabot, R. (1985). Psychophysiological responses to masked auditory
stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 30(1), 22-27.
Borgeat, F. & Goulet, J. (1983). Psychophysiological changes following auditory subliminal suggestions
for
activation and deactivation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 56(3), 759-766.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Subliminal techniques as propaganda tools: review and critique. Journal of Mind
&
Behavior, 10(3), 231-262.
Bornstein, R. F. (1990). Critical importance of stimulus unawareness for the production of subliminal
psychodynamic activation effects: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(2), 201-210.
Chakalis, E. & Lowe, G. (1992). Positive effects of subliminal stimulation of memory. Perceptual & Motor
Skills,
74(3, Pt 1), 956-958.
Chartrand, T. L. (2005). The Role of Conscious Awareness in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer
Psychology, 15(3), 203-210.
Cheesman, J. & Merikle, P. M. (1985). Word recognition and consciousness. In D. Besner & T. G. Weller &
G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 311-352). New
York:
Academic Press.
dBSONIC. (2002). (Version 3.12) [Computersoftware for psychoacoustic analysis. For description see
http:
//www.cortex-instruments.de]. Regensburg: Neutrik Cortex Instruments GmbH.
Dijksterhuis, A., Smith, P. K., van Baaren, R. B. & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2005). The unconscious consumer:
effects of environment on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(3), 193-202.
Elfont, H. & Kaplan, D. (2001). Josie and the pussycats (Director, Director). USA: Metro Goldwyn Mayer.
Friedman, R. S., McCarthy, D. M., Förster, J. & Denzler, M. (2005). Automatic effects of alcohol cues on
sexual attraction. Addiction, 100(5), 672-681.
Froufe & Schwartz, A. B. (2001). Subliminal messages for increasing self-esteem: placebo effect. Spanish
Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 19-25.
Fudin, R. & Benjamin, C. (1991). Review of auditory subliminal psychodynamic activation experiments.
Perceptual & Motor Skills, 73(3, Pt 2), 1115-1136.
Greenwald, A. G., Spangenberg, E. R., Pratkanis, A. R. & Eskenazi, J. (1991). Double-blind tests of
subliminal self-help audiotapes. Psychological Science, 2(2), 119-122.
44 Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis. JASNH, 2006, Vol. 4, No. 2 Subliminal messages
in music? 45
Groenland, E., A.G. & Schoormans, J. P. L. (1994). Comparing mood-induction and affective conditioning
as mechanisms influencing product evaluation and product choice. Psychology & Marketing, 11(2), 183-
197.
Harris, J. L., Salus, D., Rerecich, R. & Larsen, D. (1996). Distinguishing detection from identification in
subliminal auditory perception: A review and critique of Merikle‘s study. Journal of General Psychology,
123(1), 41-50.
Henley, S. (1975). Cross-modal effects of subliminal verbal stimuli. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,
16(1),
30-36.
Hughes, J. A., Sanders, L. D., Dunne, J. A., Tarpey, J. & Vickers, M. D. (1994). Reducing smoking. The
effect
of suggestion during general anaesthesia on postoperative smoking habits. Anaesthesia, 49(2), 126-128.
Kotzé, H. F. & Möller, A. T. (1990). Effect of auditory subliminal stimulation on GSR. Psychological
Reports,
67(3, Pt 1), 931-934.
Lazarus, R. S. & McCleary, R. A. (1951). Autonomic discrimination without awareness: a study of

subception. Psychological Review, 58, 113-122.
Merikle, P. M. (1988). Subliminal auditory messages: an evaluation. Psychology & Marketing, 5(4), 355-
372.
Merikle, P. M. (2000). Subliminal perception. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 7, pp.
497-
499). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merikle, P. M. & Daneman, M. (1996). Memory for unconsciously perceived events: evidence from
anesthetized patients. Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 5(4), 525-541.
Merikle, P. M. & Skanes, H. E. (1992). Subliminal self-help audiotapes: A search for placebo effects.
Journal
of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 772-776.
Milliman, R. E. (1982). Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket shoppers. Journal
of
Marketing, 46(3), 86-91.
Milliman, R. E. (1986). The influence of background music on the behavior of restaurant patrons. Journal
of Consumer Research, 13(2), 286-289.
Mitchell. (1995). Effects of subliminally presented auditory suggestions of itching on scratching behavior.
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(1), 87-96.
Moore, T. E. (1995). Subliminal self-help auditory tapes: an empirical test of perceptual consequences.
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27(1), 9-20.
Moore, T. E. (1997). Scientific consensus & expert testimony: lessons form the Judas Priest trial.
American
Psychology Law Society News, 17(1), 3-14.
Möller, A. T., Kotzé, H. F. & Sieberhagen, K. J. (1993). Comparison of the effects of auditory subliminal
stimulation and rational-emotive therapy, separately and combined, on self-concept. Psychological

Reports,
72(1), 131-145.
Naccache, L., Blandin, E. & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal
attention. Psychological Science, 13(5), 416-424.
North, A. C. (1996). The effects of music on responses to a dining area. Journal of Environmental
Psychology,
16(1), 55-64.
North, A. C., Hargreaves, D. J. & McKendrick, J. (1997). In-store music affects product choice. Nature,
390(6656), 132.
North, A. C., Hargreaves, D. J. & McKendrick, J. (1999). The influence of in-store music on wine
selections.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 271-276.
North, A. C., Hargreaves, D. J. & McKendrick, J. (2000). The effects of music on atmosphere in a bank and
a bar. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(7), 1504-1522.
Oates, C., Blades, M. & Gunter, B. (2002). Children and television advertising: when do they understand
persuasive intent? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1(3), 238-245.
Ott, R. (1998). Subliminale akustische Beeinflussung - Fakten und Fiktionen [Subliminal auditory
influences:
facts and fictions]. Hypnose und Kognition, 15(1-2), 57-78.
Packard, V. (1960). The hidden persuaders. Harmondsworth: Penguin (original work published 1957).
Pratkanis, A. R. (1992). The cargo-cult science of subliminal persuasion. The Skeptical Inquirer, 16(3),
260-
272.
Rogers, M. & Smith, K. H. (1993). Public perceptions of subliminal advertising: why practitioners
shouldn‘t
ignore this. Journal of Advertising Research, 33(2), 10-18.
Russell, T. G., Rowe, W. & Smouse, A. D. (1991). Subliminal self-help tapes and academic achievement:
an
evaluation. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69(4), 359-362.
Schiller, U. (1990, 10 August). Man hört, was man hört [You hear, what you hear]. Die Zeit, pp. 50.
44 Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis. JASNH, 2006, Vol. 4, No. 2 Subliminal messages
in music? 45
Schneider, R. U. (2004). Das Buch der verrückten Experimente [The book of crazy experiments].
München:
Bertelsmann.
Silverman, L. H. (1975). A clinical application of subliminal psychodynamic activation. Journal of Nervous

&
Mental Disease, 161(6), 379-392.

Sloboda, J. A., O‘Neill, S. & Ivaldi, A. (2001). Functions of music in everyday life: an exploratory study
using
the Experience Sampling Method. Musicae Scientiae, 5(1), 9-32.
Staum, M. J. & Brotons, M. (1992). The influence of auditory subliminals on behavior: a series of
investigations. Journal of Music Therapy, 29(3), 130-185.
Swart, L. C. & Morgan, C. L. (1992). Effects of subliminal backward-recorded messages on attitudes.
Perceptual & Motor Skills, 75(3, Pt 2), 1107-1113.
Theus, K. T. (1994). Subliminal advertising and the psychology of processing unconscious stimuli: a
review
of research. Psychology & Marketing, 11(3), 271-290.
Thorne, S. B. & Himelstein, P. (1984). The role of suggestion in the perception of satanic messages in
rockand-roll recordings. The Journal of Psychology, 116(2), 245-248.
Vokey, J. R. (2002). Subliminal messages. In J. Vokey, R. & S. W. Allen (Eds.), Psychological sketches (6th
ed., pp.
223-246). Lethbridge, Alberta: Psyence Ink.
Vokey, J. R. & Read, J. D. (1985). Subliminal messages: between the devil and the media. American
Psychologist,
40(11), 1231-1239.
Walker, M. W. (1985). Backward messages in commercially available recordings. Popular Music and
Society,
10(1), 2-13.
Walker, M. W. (1987). How to produce forward/backward recordings (without supernatural guidance).
Popular Music and Society, 11(2), 1-3.
Walls, K. C., Taylor, J. A. & Falzone, J. (1992). The effects of subliminal suggestions and music experience
on the perception of tempo in music. Journal of Music Therapy, 29(3), 186-197.
Wolpert, R. S. (2000). Attention to key in a nondirected music listening task. Music Perception, 18(2),
225-
230.
Yost, W. A. (2000). Fundamentals of hearing: an introduction (4th ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
Zwicker, E. & Fastl, H. (1999). Psychoacoustics. Facts and models (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
1. -Bargh, J. A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information
processing and social perception: The influence of trait information
presented outside of conscious awareness on impression
formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437–449.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.437
2. Bowden, E. M. (1997). The effect of reportable and unreportable hints
on anagram solution and the aha! experience. Consciousness and
Cognition, 6, 545–573. doi:10.1006/ccog.1997.0325
PubMed Article Google Scholar
3. Burnham, C. A., & Davis, K. G. (1969). The nine-dot problem: Beyond

perceptual organisation. Psyochonomic Science, 17, 321–323.
Google Scholar
4. Chronicle, E. P., MacGregor, J. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2004). What

makes an insight problem? The role of heuristics, goal conception, and
solution recoding in knowledge-lean problems. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 14–
27. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.14
5. Chronicle, E. P., Ormerod, T. C., & MacGregor, J. N. (2001). When

insight just won't come: The failure of visual cues in the nine-dot
problem. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
54A, 903–919. doi:10.1080/02724980042000471
6. Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2000). Behavioral indecision:
Effects of self-focus on automatic behavior. Social Cognition, 18, 55–74.
doi:10.1521/soco.2000.18.1.55
7. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs,
58(5), i-113. doi:10.1037/h0093599
Google Scholar
8. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem

solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.
Article Google Scholar
9. Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious

identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual
masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1–
23. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00021269
10. Holyoak, K., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in
analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332–340.
doi:10.3758/bf03197035
11. Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive

Psychology, 22, 374–419. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90008-R
12. Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W., & Claus, J. (2006). Beyond Vicary’s
fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal
of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 792–798.
doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.002
13. Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in

insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 3–13.
doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.3
14. Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of

stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557–558.
doi:10.1126/science.7352271
15. Légal, J.-B., Chappé, J., Coiffard, V., & Villard-Forest, A. (2012). Don't
you know that you want to trust me? Subliminal goal priming and
persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 358–360.
doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.006
16. Lockhart, R. S., Lamon, M., & Gick, M. L. (1988). Conceptual transfer in
simple insight problems. Memory & Cognition, 16, 36–44.
doi:10.3758/BF03197743
17. MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001).

Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on
the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 176–201.
doi:10.1037//0278-7393.27.1.176
18. Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a

problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative
Psychology, 12, 181–194. doi:10.1037/h0071361
19. Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2007). The influence of open goals
on the acquisition of problem-relevant information. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 876–
891. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.876
20. Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg

(Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
21.Nishimura, Y., & Suzuki, H. (2006). Dousatsu mondai kaiketsu-no

seiyaku kanwa-ni okeru senzaiteki jouhou syori [Implicit information
processing of constraint relaxation in insight problem-
solving]. Cognitive Studies, 13, 136–138.
Google Scholar
22. Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides
experience. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
23. Radel, R., Sarrazin, P., Legrain, P., & Gobancé, L. (2009). Subliminal
priming of motivational orientation in educational settings: Effect on
academic performance moderated by mindfulness. Journal of Research
in Personality, 43, 695–698. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.011
24. Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond
words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 122, 166–183. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.2.166
25. Schunn, C. D., & Dunbar, K. (1996). Priming, analogy, and awareness in
complex reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 24, 271–284.
doi:10.3758/BF03213292
26. Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N. S., Patalano, A. L., &
Yaniv, I. (1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic
assimilation and the prepared-mind hypothesis. In R. J. Sternberg & J.
E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 65–124). Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
27. Siegler, R. S. (2000). Unconscious insights. Current Directions in

Psychological Science, 9, 79–83. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00065
28. Snodgrass, M., Bernat, E., & Shevrin, H. (2004). Unconscious
perception: A model-based approach to method and
evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 846–867.
doi:10.3758/BF03194978
29. Spencer, R. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Context-dependent effects on
analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 14, 442–449.
doi:10.3758/bf03197019
30. Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2007). Moving eyes and moving thought:
On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and
cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 663–668.
doi:10.3758/BF03196818
31. Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2009). Covert shifts of attention function as
an implicit aid to insight. Cognition, 111, 168–174.
doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.005
32. Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theories of insight in
problem solving: A taxonomy of problems. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E.
Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 157–196). Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Google Scholar
33. Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981). Gestalt theory, insight, and past
experience: Reply to Dominowski. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 110, 193–198. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.2.199
34. Zhong, C.-B., Dijksterhuis, A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). The merits of
unconscious thought in creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 912–918.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02176.x
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bargh, J. A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The
influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449.
Bemporad, J. R. (1980). Review of object relations theory in light of
cognitive development. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 8, 57-75.
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8,279-286.
Blatt, S. J. (1974). Levels of object representation in anaclitic and introjective depression. Psychoanalytic
Study of the Child, 29, 107-157.
Bornstein, R. F. (1987). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987.
Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bornstein, R. F., Galley, D. J., & Leone, D. R. (1986). Parental representations and oraltiy. Journal of
Personality Assessment, 50, 80-89.
SUBLIMINAL MERE EXPOSURE EFFECTS 1079
Bornstein, R. F., & Masling, J. M. (1984). Subliminal psychodynamic

stimulation: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and therapy. International Forum for Psychoanalysis,
1, 187-204.
Bornstein, R. F, & Masling, J. M. (1985). Orality and latency of volunteering to serve as experimental
subjects. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 306-310.
Bornstein, R. F., Masling, J. M., & Poynton, F. G. (1987). Orality as a
factor in interpersonal yielding. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 4, 161-
170.
Dixon, N. F. (1981). Preconscious processing. New York: Wiley.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Standard Edition VII, London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1919). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edii.jn IV &
V. London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1900)
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition XIX. London:
Hogarth.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Harrison, A. A. (1968). Response competition, frequency, expectancy
behavior and liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9,
363-368.
Harrison, A. A., & Crandall, R. (1972). Heterogeneity and homogeneity
of exposure sequences and the attitudinal effects of exposure. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 234-238.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination
of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207,557-558.
Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. A merican Psychologist, 39, 124-129.
Masling, J. M., Bornstein, R. F., Poynton, F. G., Reed, S. D., & Katkin,
E. S. (1987). Subliminal stimulation and electrodermal responding.
Manuscript submitted for publication.
McConnell, J. V, Cutler, R. L., & McNeil, E. B. (1958). Subliminal
stimulation: An overview. American Psychologist, 13, 229-242.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know:
Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-
259.
Piaget, J. (1937). The construction of reality in the child. New York:
Basic Books.
Poetzl, O. (1917). The relationship between experimentally induced
dream images and indirect vision [Monograph No. 7). Psychological
Issues, 2, 41-120.
Saegert, S. C, & JeUison, J. M. (1970). Effects of initial level of response
competition and frequency of exposure on liking and exploratory behavior. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 16, 553-558.
Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983a). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not
recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking,
and cerebral laterally Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 544-555.
Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983b). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not
recognized: II. Effect of delay between
study and test. Bulletin of the Psychometric Society, 21, 187-189.
Seamon, J. G., Marsh, R. L., & Brody, N. (1984). Critical importance
of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are
not recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 10, 465-469.
Silverman, L. H. (1966). A technique for the study of psychodynamic
relationships: The effects of subliminally-presented aggressive stimuli
on the production of pathological thinking in a schizophrenic population. Journal ofConsulting

Psychology, 30, 103-111.
Silverman, L. H. (1977). Ethical considerations and guidelines in the
use of subliminal psychodynamic activation. Unpublished manuscript, New York University, Research
Center for Mental Health.
Silverman, L. H. (1983). The subliminal psychodynamic activation
method: Overview and comprehensive listing of studies. In J. Masling
(Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories (pp. 69-100).

Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spence, D. P. (1964). Conscious and preconscious influences on recall.
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 92-99.
Spitzer, R. L., Cohen, J., Fliess, J. L., & Endicott, J. (1967). Quantification of agreement in psychiatric
diagnosis. Archives of General Psychiatry. 17, 83-87.
Triesman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention.
Psychological Review, 76, 282-299.
Vanderplas, J. M., & Garvin, E. A. (1959). The association value of
random shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5 7, 147-154.
Winson, J. (1984). Brain and psyche: The biology of the unconscious.
New York: Doubleday.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology Monograph. 9(2, Pt. 2), 1-27.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35,
151-175.
Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist,
39, 117-123.
References
Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mid-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.

Psychophysiology, 26, 251–269.
Damian, M. F. (2001). Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather
than semantic processing. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 154–165.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le ClecH, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998).
Imaging unconscious semantic
priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.
Dell Acqua, R., & Grainger, I. (1999). Unconscious semantic priming from pictures. Cognition, 73, B1–
B15.
Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response
activation processes. Behavior research
methods, instruments, computers, 30, 146–156.

Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and
electrophysiological evidence.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737–1747.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.
Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484.
A. Kiesel et al. / Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 397–408 407
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1954). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24,
95–112.
Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic
activation. Science, 273,
1699–1702.
Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal
vision, and visual masking: A
survey and appraisal. The behavioral and brain sciences, 9, 1–66.
Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample
data in the randomized block and
split-plot designs. Journal of Statistics Education, 1, 69–82.
Jasper, H. H. (1958). Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in

electroencephalography. Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 370–375.
Keller, P. E., Wascher, E., Prinz, W., Waszak, F., Koch, I., & Rosenbaum, D.A. (in press). Differences
between intention-based and
stimulus-based actions. Journal of Psychophysiology.
Klapp, S. T., & Haas, B. W. (2005). Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is
limited to concrete stimulus–
response associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31,
193–209.
Klapp, S. T., & Hinkley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences
reaction time and response
selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255–269.
Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast
masking. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976–992.
Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus–response correspondence effects depend on

awareness of response conflict.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198–205.
Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious
cognition. Cognition, 88, 223–242.
Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating. A cautionary tale of mask-
dependent priming. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475–493.
Mordkoff, J. T., & Gianaros, P. J. (2000). Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: A
comparison of available methods
and procedures. Psychophysiology, 37, 347–360.
Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit
of direct parameter specification?
In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV. Conscious and nonconscious
information processing
(pp. 123–150). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pratkanis, A. R. (1992). The cargo-cult sciece of subliminal persuation. Skeptical Inquirer, 16.
Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1994). A Monte Carlo comparison of seven e-adjustment procedures
in repeated measures designs with
small sample sizes. Journal of Statistics Education, 19, 57–71.
Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1993). Theory and measurement in the study of unconscious
processes. In M. Davies & G. Humphreys
(Eds.). Consciousness: Psychological and philosophical essays. Readings in mind and language (Vol. 2, pp.
40–57). Malden, MA, US:
Blackwell Publishers.
Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2004). Masked prime stimuli can bias ‘‘free’’ choices between response
alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin
& Review, 11, 463–468.
Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a
threshold mechanism in motor
control. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148–162.

Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime users guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology
Software Tools.
Shanks, D. R., & John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral &
Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.
Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., Aydemir, A., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Groen, M. (2004). Qualitative
differences between conscious and
nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: General, 133, 494–515.
Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for
visual perception and action
priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 6275–
6280.
Waszak, F., Wascher, E., Keller, P. E., Koch, I., Aschersleben, G., Rosenbaum, D. A., et al. (2005).
Intention-based and stimulus-based
mechanisms in action selection. Experimental brain research, 162, 346–356.
-Avant, L. L. and Thieman, A. A. 1985. On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic
information. Memory and Cognition 13: 393–404.
Balota, D. A. 1983. Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory. Journal of verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 88–104.
Bauer, R. M. 1984. Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A
neuropsychological application of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Neuropsychologia 224:
457–469.
Baars, B. J. 1994. A thoroughly empirical approach to consciousness. PSYCHE 16.
Cheesman, J. and Merikle, P. M. 1984. Priming with and without awareness. Perception and
Psychophysics 36: 387–395.
Cheesman, J. and Merikle, P. M. 1986. Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual
processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology 40: 343–367.
Dixon, L. F. 1971. Subliminal Perception: The Nature of a Controversy. New York: McGraw
Hill.
Farah, M. J. 1989. Mechanisms of imagery-perception interaction. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15: 203–211.

Farah, M. J. 1994. Specialisation within visual object recognition: Clues from prosopagnosia and alexia.
In: M. J. Farah and F. Ratcliff (eds), The Neuropsychology of HighLevel Vision: Collected Tutorial Essays,
pp. 133–146. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Fendrich, R., Wessinger, C. M. and Gazzaniga, M. S. 2000. Speculations on the neural basis
of islands of blindsight. Progress in Brain Research 134: 353–366.
Fowler, C. A., Wolford, G., Slade, R. and Tassinary, L. 1981. Lexical access with
and without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110: 341–
362.
Georgeson, M. 1997. Vision and action: You ain’t seen nothin’ yet .... Perception 26
(http://www.perceptionweb.com/perc0197/editorial.html).
Groeger, J. 1988. Qualitatively different effects of undetected and unidentified auditory primes.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A: 323–339.
Hines, D., Czerwinski, M., Sawyer, P. K. and Dwyer, M. 1986. Automatic semantic priming:
Effect of category exemplar level and word association level. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12: 370–379.
Jack, A. I. and Shallice, T. 2001. Introspective physicalism as an approach to the science of
consciousness. Cognition 79: 161–196.
Kemp-Wheeler, S. M. and Hill, A. B. 1988. Semantic priming without awareness: Some
methodological considerations and replications.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A: 671–

692.
Kihlstrom, J. F. 1987. The cognitive unconscious. Science 237: 1145–1151.
Kolb, F. C. and Braun, J. 1995. Blindsight in normal observers. Nature 377 (6547): 336–
338.
Kotze, H. F. and Moller, A. T. 1990. Effect of auditory subliminal stimulation on GSR. Psychological
Reports 67: 931–934.
22 THOMAS ZOEGA RAMS ¨ ØY AND MORTEN OVERGAARD
Kunst-Wilson, W. R. and Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot
be recognized. Science 207: 557–558.
Lutz, A. 2002. Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: A first

empirical case study. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (2): 133–167.
McCauley, C., Parmelee, C. M. and Sperber, R. D. 1980. Early extraction of meaning from
pictures and its relation to conscious identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance 62: 265–276.
Mangan, B. 2001. Sensation’s Ghost. The Non-Sensory “Fringe” of Consciousness. PSYCHE
718 (October).
Marcel, A. J. 1983. Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking
and word recognition, Cognitive Psychology 15: 197–237.
Marcel, A. J. 1998. Blindsight and shape perception: deficit of visual consciousness or of visual
function? Brain 121 (Part 8): 1565–1588.
Merikle, P. M. and Daneman, M. 1998a. Memory for unconsciously perceived events: Evidence
from anesthetized patients. Consciousness and Cognition 5: 525–541.
Merikle, P. M. and Daneman, M. 1998b. Psychological investigations of unconscious perception. Journal

of Consciousness Studies 5: 5–18.
Merikle, P. M. and Daneman, M. 2000. Conscious vs. unconscious perception. In: M. S.
Gazzaniga (ed), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 2nd edn., pp. 1295–1303. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Merikle, P. M. and Joordens, S. 1997a. Measuring unconscious influences. In: J. D. Cohen and
J. W. Schooler (eds), Scientific Approaches to Consciousness, pp. 109–123. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Merikle, P. M. and Joordens, S. 1997b. Parallels between perception without attention and
perception without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 6: 219–236.
Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D. and Eastwood, J. D. 2001. Perception without awareness: Perspectives
from cognitive psychology. Cognition 79: 115–134.
Norman, E. 2002. Subcategories of “fringe consciousness” and their related nonconscious contexts.
PSYCHE 815 (October) (http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v8/psyche-8–15-
norman.html).
Overgaard, M., Kauffmann, O. and Ramsøy, T. Z. 2001. Consciousness and introspection.
Journal of Consciousness Studies: Consciousness Research Abstract, 182.

Overgaard, M. and Sørensen, T. A. (submitted). Introspection as a process distinct from first
order experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
Peirce, C. S. and Jastrow, J. 1884. On small differences of sensation. Memoirs of National
Academy of Sciences 3: 73–83.
Ptito, A., Fortin, A. and Ptito, M. 2001. ‘Seeing’ in the blind hemifield following hemispherectomy.
Progress in Brain Research 134: 367–378.
Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L. and Stanovich, K. E. 1983. Another look at semantic priming
without awareness. Perception and Psychophysics 34: 65–71.
Rosenthal, D. 2000a. Introspection and self-interpretation. Philosophical Topics 28 (2): 201–
233.
Rosenthal, D. 2000b. Metacognition and higher-order thoughts. Consciousness and Cognition
9 (2): 231–242.
Schooler, J. W. 2002. Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience and
meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (8): 339–344.
Sidis, B. 1898. The Psychology of Suggestion. New York: Appleton and Company.
Stambrook, M. and Martin, D. G. 1983. Brain laterality and the subliminal perception of facial
expression.International Journal of Neuroscience 18 (1/2): 45–
58.
INTROSPECTION AND SUBLIMINAL PERCEPTION 23
Stroh, M. A., Shaw, M. and Washburn, M. F. 1908. A study of guessing. American Journal of
Psychology 19: 243–245.
Tranel, D. and Damasio, A. R. 1985. Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of
facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science 228 (4706): 1453–1454.
Weiskrantz, L. 1986. Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zeki, S. and Ffytche, D. H. 1998. The Riddoch syndrome: Insights into the neurobiology of
conscious vision. Brain 121: 25–45
- Aarts H Custers R Marien H. Preparing and motivating behavior outside of awareness.

Science2008;319:1639. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150432.
Google ScholarCrossrefPubMed
Abadie M Waroquier L Terrier P. Gist memory in the unconscious-thought effect. Psychol
Sci2013;24:1253–9. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612470958.
Addante RJ. A critical role of the human hippocampus in an electrophysiological measure of implicit
memory. NeuroImage2015;109:515–28. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.069.
Arzi A Holtzman Y Samnon P , et al. . Olfactory aversive conditioning during sleep reduces cigarette-
smoking behavior. J Neurosci2014;34:15382–93. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2291-14.2014.
Arzi A Shedlesky L Ben-Shaul M , et al. . Humans can learn new information during sleep. Nat
Neurosci2012;15:1460–5. http://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3193
Atas A Faivre N Timmermans B , et al. . Nonconscious learning from crowded sequences. Psychol
Sci2013. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613499591.
Google Scholar
Bergström F Eriksson J. The conjunction of non-consciously perceived object identity and spatial
position can be retained during a visual short-term memory task. Conscious
Res2015;1470.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01470
Google Scholar
Bermeitinger C Goelz R Johr N , et al. . The hidden persuaders break into the tired brain. J Exp Soc
Psychol2009;45:320–6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.001
Google ScholarCrossref
Bettman JR Luce MF Payne JW. Constructive consumer choice processes. J Cons Res1998;25:187–217.
http://doi.org/10.1086/209535
Capa RL Cleeremans A Bustin GM , et al. . Long-lasting effect of subliminal processes on cardiovascular

responses and performance. Int J Psychophysiol2011;81:22–30.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.04.001
Chen JCW Li W Lui M , et al. . Left-frontal brain potentials index conceptual implicit memory for words
initially viewed subliminally. Brain Res2009;1285:135–47. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.085
Chong TTJ Husain M Rosenthal CR. Recognizing the unconscious. Curr Biol2014;24:R1033–5.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.035
Chun MM Phelps EA. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with
hippocampal damage. Nat Neurosci1999;2:844–7. http://doi.org/10.1038/12222
Daltrozzo J Claude L Tillmann B , et al. . Working memory is partially preserved during sleep. PLoS
ONE2012;7:e50997.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050997
Dew ITZ Cabeza R. The porous boundaries between explicit and implicit memory: behavioral and neural
evidence. Ann NY Acad Sci2011;1224:174–90. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05946.x
Dienes Z. Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference.

New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Google Scholar
Dienes Z. Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Quant Psychol
Meas2014;5:781.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis A Bos MW Nordgren LF , et al. . On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-
attention effect. Science2006;311:1005–7. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121629.
Dijksterhuis A Nordgren LF. A theory of unconscious thought. Perspect Psychol Sci2006;1:95–109.

http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x.
Duss SB Oggier S Reber TP , et al. . Formation of semantic associations between subliminally presented
face-word pairs. Conscious Cogn2011;20:928–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.018.
Duss SB Reber TP Hänggi J , et al. . Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus.

Brain2014;137:3355–70. http://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu270.
Farooqui AA Manly T. Anticipatory control through associative learning of subliminal relations: invisible
may be better than visible. Psychol Sci2015;26:325–34. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614564191.
Ferrand L. The masked repetition priming effect dissipates when increasing the inter-stimulus interval:
evidence from word naming. Acta Psychologica1996;91:15–25. http://doi.org/10.1016/0001-
6918(95)00010-0.
Forster K Booker J Schacter DL , et al. . Masked repetition priming: lexical activation or novel memory
trace?Bull Psychon Soc1990;28:341–5. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334039.
Gaillard R Cohen L Adam C , et al. . Subliminal words durably affect neuronal activity.
NeuroReport2007;18:1527–31. http://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f0b6cd.
García-Orza J Damas-López J Matas A , et al. . “2 x 3” primes naming “6”: evidence from masked
priming. Atten Percept Psychophys2009;71:471–80. http://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.3.471
Greene AJ Gross WL Elsinger CL , et al. . An fMRI analysis of the human hippocampus: inference,
context, and task awareness. J Cogn Neurosci2006;18:1156–73.
http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1156
Greene AJ Gross WL Elsinger CL , et al. . Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI

analysis of the contextual cueing task. Learn Mem2007;14:548–53. http://doi.org/10.1101/lm.609807.
Greenwald AG Draine SC Abrams RL. Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation.
Science1996;273:1699–702. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5282.1699
Greenwald AG Klinger MR Schuh ES. Activation by marginally perceptible (“subliminal”) stimuli:

dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. J Exp Psychol-Gen1995;124:22–42.
Hannula DE Greene AJ. The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: at a tipping
point? Front Hum Neurosci 2012;6. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00080.
Google Scholar
Hannula DE Ranganath C. The eyes have it: hippocampal activity predicts expression of memory in eye
movements. Neuron2009;63:592–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.025.
Harand C Bertran F La Joie R , et al. . The hippocampus remains activated over the long term for the
retrieval of truly episodic memories. PLoS
ONE2012;7:e43495.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043495.
Hassin RR. Yes it can: on the functional abilities of the human unconscious. Perspect Psychol
Sci2013;8:195–207. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460684.
Hassin RR Ferguson MJ Shidlovski D , et al. . Subliminal exposure to national flags affects political
thought and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2007;104:19757–61.
http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704679104.
Henke K. A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nat Rev
Neurosci2010;11:523–32. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2850.
Henke K Buck A Weber B , et al. . Human hippocampus establishes associations in memory.

Hippocampus1997;7:249–56. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:3<249::AID-
HIPO1>3.0.CO;2-G.
Henke K Mondadori CRA Treyer V , et al. . Nonconscious formation and reactivation of semantic
associations by way of the medial temporal lobe. Neuropsychologia2003;41:863–76.
http://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00035-6.
Henke K Reber TP Duss SB. Integrating events across levels of consciousness. Front Behav
Neurosci2013;7:68.http://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00068.
Hesselmann G Moors P. Definitely maybe: can unconscious processes perform the same functions as
conscious processes? Conscious Res 2015;584. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00584.
Google Scholar
Holdstock JS Mayes AR Isaac CL , et al. . Differential involvement of the hippocampus and temporal lobe
cortices in rapid and slow learning of new semantic information. Neuropsychologia2002;40:748–68.
http://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00192-0.
Karpinski A Yale M Briggs JC. Unconscious arithmetic processing: a direct replication. Eur J Soc
Psychol2016; n/a-n/a. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2175.
Google Scholar
Karremans JC Stroebe W Claus J. Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: the impact of subliminal priming and brand
choice. J Exp Soc Psychol2006;42:792–8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.002.
Kawakami N Yoshida F. Perceiving a story outside of conscious awareness: when we infer narrative
attributes from subliminal sequential stimuli. Conscious Cogn2015;33:53–66.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.001.
Kiesel A Wagener A Kunde W , et al. . Unconscious manipulation of free choice in humans. Conscious
Cogn2006;15:397–408. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.10.002.
Klapp ST Haas BW. Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to
concrete stimulus-response associations. J Exp Psychol-Hum Percept Perform2005;31:193–209.
http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.193.
Lau HC Passingham RE. Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human prefrontal
cortex. J Neurosci2007;27:5805–11. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4335-06.2007.
Levy BR Pilver C Chung PH , et al. . Subliminal strengthening: improving older individuals’ physical
function over time with an implicit-age-stereotype intervention. Psychol Sci2014;2525:2127–35.
http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551970.
Lowery BS Eisenberger NI Hardin CD , et al. . Long-term effects of subliminal priming on academic

performance. BASP2007;29:151–7. http://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701331718.
Google Scholar
McClelland JL McNaughton BL O’reilly RC. Why there are complementary learning systems in the
hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of
learning and memory. Psychol Rev1995;102:419–57.
Mealor AD Dienes Z. Conscious and unconscious thought in artificial grammar learning. Conscious
Cogn2012;21:865–74. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.001.
Miller J. Measurement error in subliminal perception experiments: simulation analyses of two

regression methods. J Exp Psychol-Hum Percept Perform2000;26:1461–77.
Monahan JL Murphy ST Zajonc RB. Subliminal mere exposure: specific, general, and diffuse effects.
Psychol Sci2000;11:462–6. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00289.
Moscovitch M. Recovered consciousness: a hypothesis concerning modularity and episodic memory. J

Clin Exp Neuropsychol1995;17:276–90. http://doi.org/10.1080/01688639508405123.
Mudrik L Breska A Lamy D , et al. . Integration without awareness: expanding the limits of unconscious
processing. Psychol Sci2011;22:764–70. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611408736.
Mudrik L Faivre N Koch C. Information integration without awareness. Trends Cogn Sci2014;18:488–6.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.009.
Mudrik L Koch C. Differential processing of invisible congruent and incongruent scenes: a case for
unconscious integration. J Vis2013;13:24.http://doi.org/10.1167/13.13.24.
Negash S Kliot D Howard DV , et al. . Relationship of contextual cueing and hippocampal volume in
amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients and cognitively normal older adults. J Int Neuropsychol
Soc2015;21:285–96. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617715000223.
Newell BR Shanks DR. Unconscious influences on decision making: a critical review. Behav Brain
Sci2014;1–19. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214.
Google Scholar
Nieuwenstein MR Wierenga T Morey RD , et al. . On making the right choice: a meta-analysis and large-
scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgm Decis Mak2015;10:1–17.
Google Scholar
Ocampo B. Unconscious manipulation of free choice by novel primes. Conscious Cogn2015;34:4–9.

Olsen RK Moses SN Riggs L , et al. . The hippocampus supports multiple cognitive processes through
relational binding and comparison. Front Hum
Neurosci2012;6:146.http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00146.
Parkinson J Haggard P. Subliminal priming of intentional inhibition. Cognition2014;130:255–65.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.005.
Reber TP DoLam A Elger CE , et al. . Intracranial EEG correlates of implicit relational inference within the
hippocampus. Hippocampus2016;26:54–66. http://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22490.
Reber TP Henke K. Integrating unseen events over time. Conscious Cogn2012;21:953–60.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.013
Reber TP Luechinger R Boesiger P , et al. . Unconscious relational inference recruits the hippocampus. J
Neurosci2012;32:6138–48. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5639-11.2012.
Reder LM Park H Kieffaber PD. Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting
memory in terms of activation and binding. Psychol Bull2009;135:23–49.
http://doi.org/10.1037/a0013974.
Reuss H Kiesel A Kunde W , et al. . Unconscious activation of task sets. Conscious Cogn2011;20:556–67.
Ruby P Caclin A Boulet S , et al. . Odd sound processing in the sleeping brain. J Cognitive
Neurosci2008;20:296–311. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20023.
Ruch S Koenig T Mathis J , et al. . Word encoding during sleep is suggested by correlations between
word-evoked up-states and post-sleep semantic priming. Front
Psychol2014;5:1319.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01319.
Google ScholarPubMed
Schlaghecken F Eimer M. Masked prime stimuli can bias “free” choices between response alternatives.
Psychon Bull Rev2004;11:463–8. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196596.
Shanks DR. Learning: from association to cognition. Annu Rev Psychol2010;61:273–301.

http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519.
Simonson I. In defense of consciousness: the role of conscious and unconscious inputs in consumer
choice. J Cons Psychol2005;15:211–17. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1503_5.
Sklar AY Levy N Goldstein A , et al. . Reading and doing arithmetic nonconsciously. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA2012. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211645109.
Google Scholar
Squire LR Zola SM. Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA1996;93:13515–22.
Strahan EJ Spencer SJ Zanna MP. Subliminal priming and persuasion: striking while the iron is hot. J Exp
Soc Psychol2002;38:556–68. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00502-4
Tononi G. An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC

Neurosci2004;5:42.http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-5-42.
Tulving E. Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annu Rev Psychol2002;53:1–25. http://doi.org/Article
Vadillo MA Kostopoulou O Shanks DR. A critical review and meta-analysis of the unconscious thought
effect in medical decision making. Conscious Res2015;636.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00636.
Google Scholar
Van den Bussche E Van den Noortgate W Reynvoet B. Mechanisms of masked priming: a meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull2009;135:452–77. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0015329.
van Gaal S De Lange FP Cohen MX. The role of consciousness in cognitive control and decision making.
Front Hum Neurosci2012;6:121.http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00121.
Van Opstal F de Lange FP Dehaene S. Rapid parallel semantic processing of numbers without
awareness. Cognition2011;120:136–47. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.03.005.
Verwijmeren T Karremans JC Bernritter SF , et al. . Warning: You are being primed! The effect of a
warning on the impact of subliminal ads. J Exp Soc Psychol2013;49:1124–9.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.010.
Verwijmeren T Karremans JC Stroebe W , et al. . The workings and limits of subliminal advertising: the
role of habits. J Cons Psychol2011;21:206–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.11.004.
Vlassova A Donkin C Pearson J. Unconscious information changes decision accuracy but not confidence.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2014;111:16214–8. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403619111.
Weinberger J Westen D. RATS, we should have used Clinton: subliminal priming in political campaigns.
Polit Psychol2008;29:631–51. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00658.x.
Züst MA Colella P Reber TP , et al. . Hippocampus is place of interaction between unconscious and
conscious memories. PLoS ONE2015;10:e0122459.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122459.
to consciousness, top-down processing has been suggested as a key feature (Dehaene & Naccache, 2001). Here,
we argue thatit is not crucial because these processes can occur outside consciousness. Also, the current study
demonstrates that top-down processing can be differentiated from ‘mental effort’, another feature that is
proposed to be critical to consciousness(Dehaene et al., 1998): Top-down modulation changed unconsciously, so it
can hardly be qualified as effortful. This does not,of course, imply that other features of consciousness are not
crucial either. For example, recent research demonstrates that‘seriality’ may be crucial in the sense that chaining
mental operations requires consciousness (Sackur & Dehaene, 2009; VanOpstal, de Lange, & Dehaene, 2011).A
theory of consciousness should clarify which features are crucial for consciousness. Developing such a theory is
obvi-ously beyond the scope of the current paper, but the paper does show that a feature which standardly has
been assumed tobe crucial, actually is not. As such, it underscores the power of unconscious
processes.AcknowledgmentF.V.O. is a Postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation–Flanders (FWO-
Vlaanderen). F.V.O. and T.V. were supported byGOA B/09019/02.References Anderson, B. L., & Winawer, J. (2005). Image
segmentation and lightness perception.Nature, 434, 79–83.Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence
of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming.PsychonomicBulletin & Review, 10, 645–652.Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2004).
Beyond binary judgments: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task.Memory &Cognition, 32, 1–11.Bodner, G. E.,
Masson, M. E. J., & Richard, N. T. (2006). Repetition proportion biases masked priming of lexical decisions.Memory & Cognition, 34, 1298–
1311.Boles, D. B., & Clifford, J. E. (1989). An upper- and lowercase alphabetic similarity matrix, with derived generation similarity
values.Behavioral ResearchMethods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 579–586.Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2011). Learning of predictive relations
between events depends on attention, not on awareness.Consciousness and Cognition, 20,368–378.Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001).
Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework.Cognition, 79, 1–37.Dehaene, S., Naccache, L.,
Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., et al (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious
repetitionpriming.Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752–758.Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Cleq’h, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et
al (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming.Nature, 395,597–600.Eiser, J. R. (1990).Social judgment. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks/Cole.Heinemann, A., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2009). Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role conscious stimulus
representations for cognitivecontrol.Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 966–976.Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J.
(2009). Playing chess unconsciously.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory andCognition, 35, 292–298.Kinoshita, S., Forster, K.
I., & Mozer, M. I. (2008). Unconscious cognition isn’t that smart: Modulation of masked repetition priming effect in the word
namingtask.Cognition, 107, 623–649.Laming, D. R. J. (1984). The relativity of ‘‘absolute’’ judgements.British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 37, 152–183.Lau, H., & Passingham, R. E. (2007). Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human
prefrontal cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 27,5805–5811.Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual
approach.Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326.Parducci, A. (1954). Learning variables in the judgment of single stimuli.Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 48, 24–30.Sackur, J., & Dehaene, S. (2009). The cognitive architecture for chaining of two mental operations.Cognition, 111, 187–
211.Shin, E., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2006). Multiple levels of stimulus representation in visual working memory.Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 18,844–858.Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment.Psychological Review,
112, 881–911.Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211, 453–458.Van den
Bussche, E., Segers, G., & Reynvoet, B. (2008). Conscious and unconscious proportion effects in masked priming.Consciousness and Cognition,
17,1345–1358.van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. (2008). Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously
triggered inhibitory control.Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 8053–8062.Van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, R. K., Scholte, S. H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2010).
Unconscious activation of the prefrontal no-go network.Journal of Neuroscience, 30,4143–4150.Van Opstal, F., de Lange, F. P., & Dehaene, S.
(2011). Rapid parallel semantic processing of numbers without awareness.Cognition, 120, 136–147.Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Osman, M., &
Verguts, T. (2010). Unconscious task application.Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 999–1006.Van Opstal, F., Moors, A., Fias, W., & Verguts, T.
(2008). Offline and online automatic number comparison.Psychological Research, 72, 347–352.Van Opstal, F., Reynvoet, B., & Verguts, T.
(2005). How to trigger elaborate processing? A comment on Kunde, Kiesel, & Hoffmann (2003).Cognition, 97,89–97.Vuilleumier, P., Henson, R.
N., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming.Nature
Neuroscience, 5, 491–499
-References
[1] Astolfi, L., Toppi, J., Fallani, F.D., Vecchiato, G., Cincotti, F. et al. 2011. Imaging the social brain by
simultaneous hyperscanning during subject interaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(5): 38–45. DOI:
10.1109/MIS.2011.61
[2] Axelrod, V., Bar, M., Rees, G. 2015. Exploring the unconscious using faces. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences.
19(1): 35-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.003
[3] Babiloni, C., Miniussi, C., Babiloni, F., Carducci, F., Cincotti, F. et al. 2004. Sub-second ‘‘temporal
attention’’
modulates alpha rhythms.A high-resolution EEG study. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(3): 259 – 268. DOI:
10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.010
[4] Bacik, R., Gavurora, B., Fedorko, I. 2015. The analysis of the impact of selected marketing
communication
factors on the online consumer behavior. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume X, Winter,
37(7):
999-1004.
[5] Balconi, M., Ferrari, C. 2012. Subliminal and supraliminal processing of facial expression of emotions:
Brain
oscillation in the left/right frontal area. Brain Sciences, 2: 85-100. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci2020085
[6] Bensmann, W., Vahid, A., Beste, C., Stock, A. 2019b. The intensity of early attentional processing, but
not
conflict monitoring, determines the size of subliminal response conflicts. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience, 13:
1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00053
[7] Bensmann, W., Zink, N., Mückschel, M., Beste, C., Stock, A. 2019a. Neuronal networks underlying the
conjoint
modulation of response selection by subliminal and consciously induced cognitive conflicts. Brain
Structure
and Function, 224: 1697–1709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01866-0
[8] Brooks, S., Savov, V., Allzén, E., Benedict, C., Fredriksson, R., Schiöth, H. 2012. Exposure to subliminal
arousing stimuli induces robust activation in the amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate, insular
cortex and
primary visual cortex: A systematic meta-analysis of fMRI studies. NeuroImage, 59: 2962–2975. DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.077
[9] Broyles, S.J. 2006. Subliminal advertising and the perpetual popularity of playing to people’s
paranoia. The
Journal of Consumer Affairs, 40(2): 329–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00063.x
[10] Button, K.S., Ioannidis, J.P., Mokrysz, C., Nosak, B.A., Flint, J., Robinson, E.S., Munafò, M.R. 2013.
Power
failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience,
14:
365–376.
[11] Cacioppo, S., Grafton, S.T. and Bianchi-Demicheli, F. 2012. The speed of passionate love, as a
subliminal
prime: A high-density electrical neuroimaging study. NeuroQuantology, 10(4): 715-724. DOI:
10.14704/nq.2012.10.4.509
[12] Chalfoun, P., Frasson, C. 2011. Subliminal cues while teaching: HCI technique for enhanced learning.
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Article ID 968753, 15 p. DOI:10.1155/2011/968753. Available

at:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ahci/2011/968753/
[13] Charles, L., Opstal, F.V., Marti, S., Dehaene, S. 2013. Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus
subliminal error detection. Neuroimage, 73: 80–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.054
[14] Cruz, A.L., Arango-Muñoz, S., Volz, K.G. 2016. Oops, scratch that! Monitoring one’s own errors
during mental.
Cognition, 146: 110–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.005
Journal of Applied Economic Sciences
814
[15] Dall’Acqua, T., Begliomini, C., Motta, R., Miotto, D., and Castiello, U. 2018. Effects of intentionality
and
subliminal information in free-choices to inhibit. Neuropsychologia, 109: 28–38. DOI:
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.035
[16] Dimoka, A., Banker, R.D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F.D., Dennis, A.R. et al. 2012. On the use of
neurophysicological
tools in IS research: Developing a research agenda for neuroIS. MIS Quarterly, 36(3): 679–702
[17] Doyen, S., Klein, O., Simons, D.J., Cleeremans, A. 2014. On the other side of the mirror: Priming in
cognitive
and social psychology. Social Cognition, 32: 12-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.12
[18] Elci, M., Sert, A. 2017. Subliminal advertising and its ethical dimensions in the social media age. In I.
R.
Association, Advertising and Branding: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 91–110 pp.
Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8125-5.ch020
[19] Elgendi, M., Kumar, P., Barbic, S., Howard, N., Abbott, D., Cichocki, A. 2018. Subliminal priming -
State of the
art and future perspectives. Behavioral Sciences, 8: 54. DOI: 10.3390/bs8060054
[20] Farnsworth, B. 2017. EEG vs. MRI vs. fMRI – What are the differences? Available at:
https://imotions.com/blog/
eeg-vs-mri-vs-fmri-differences
[21] Gabrieli, J. 2011. Introduction to Psychology. Available at:

https://theopenacademy.com/content/lecture-4-
brain-ii-methods-research.
[22] Gao, Y., Zhang, H. 2014. Unconscious processing modulates creative problem solving: Evidence from
an
electrophysiological study. Consciousness and Cognition, 26: 64–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.001
[23] Garner, W.R., Hake, H.W., Eriksen, C.W. 1956. Operationism and the concept of perception.
Psychological
Review, 63(3): 149–159. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0042992
[24] Giattino, C.M., Alam, Z.M., Woldorff, M. G. 2018. Neural processes underlying the orienting of
attention without
awareness. Cortex, 102: 14-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.010

[25] Gibbons, H. 2009. Evaluative priming from subliminal emotional words: Insights from event-related
potentials
and individual differences related to anxiety. Consciousness and Cognition, 18: 383–400. DOI:
10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.007
[26] Gillath, O., Canterberry, M. 2012. Neural correlates of exposure to subliminal and supraliminal
sexual cues.
Scan, 7: 924-936. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr065
[27] Grau, C., Ginhoux, R., Riera, A., Nguyen, T.L., Chauvat, H. et al. 2014. Conscious brain-to-brain
communication in humans using non-invasive technologies. Plos One, 9(8): e105225. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105225
[28] Harris, P., Murawski, C. 2010. Unconscious brand reactions influence financial decision-making.
Advances in
Consumer Research, 37: 810–812
[29] Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V., Alija, P. 2013. Nature imagery in advertising. International Journal of
Advertising,
23(2): 183–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-32-2-183-210
[30] Hashimoto, T., Umeda, S., Kojima, S. 2011. Neural substrates of implicit cueing effect on prospective
memory.
NeuroImage, 54: 645–652. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.047
[31] Hollenstein, M., Koenig, T., Kubat, M., Blaser, D., Perrig, W.J. 2012. Non-conscious word processing
in a
mirror-masking paradigm causing attentional distraction: An ERP-study. Consciousness and Cognition,

21:
353–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.005
[32] Hsu, M. 2017. Neuromarketing: Inside the mind of the consumer. California Management Review,
59(4): 5–
22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617720208
[33] Ibáñez, A., Hurtado, E., Lobos, A., Escobar, J., Trujillo, N. et al. 2011. Subliminal presentation of
other faces
(but not own face) primes behavioral and evoked cortical processing of empathy for pain. Brain
Research,
1398: 72–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.014

815
[34] Ikpefan, O.A., Olaolu, R., Omankhanlen, E. A., Osuwa, G.O., Evbuomwan, G. 2018. Impact of
marketing of
deposit money bank services on customers’ patronage and loyalty. Empirical study of five deposit
money banks
in Nigeria, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XIII, 62(8): 2446-2459.
[35] Jiang, Y., Wu, X., Saab, R., Xiao, Y., Gao, X. 2018. Time course of influence on the allocation of
attentional
resources caused by unconscious fearful faces. Neuropsychologia, 113: 104–110. DOI:
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.001
[36] Jiménez-Ortega, L., Espuny, J., de Tejada, P.H., Vargas-Rivero, C., Martín-Loeches. M. 2017.
Subliminal
emotional words impact syntactic processing: Evidence from performance and event-related brain
potentials.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11: 192. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00192
[37] Kasai, K., Fukuda, M., Yahata, N., Morita, K., Fujii, N. 2015. The future of real-world neuroscience:
Imaging
techniques to assess act brains in social environments. Neuroscience Research, 90: 65–71. DOI:
10.1016/j.neures.2014.11.007
[38] King, J.A., Korb, F.M., Egner, T. 2012. Priming of control: Implicit contextual cuing of top-down
attentional set.
The Journal of Neurosciencs, 32(24): 8192– 8200. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0934-12.2012
[39] Kiss, M., Eimer, M. 2008. ERPs reveal subliminal processing of fearful faces. Psychophysiology, 45(2):
318–
326. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00634.x
[40] Kongthong, N., Minami, M., Nakauchi, N. 2013. Semantic processing in subliminal face stimuli: An
EEG and
tDCS study. Neuroscience Letters, 544:141–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.04.002
[41] Kongthong, N., Minami, M., Nakauchi, N. 2013. Semantic processing in subliminal face stimuli: An
EEG and
tDCS study. Neuroscience Letters, 544:141–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.04.002

[42] Košíková, K., Pilárik, Ľ. 2012. Unconscious visual perception in the decision making process. Studia
Psychologica, 54(4): 261–270.
[43] Kouider, S., Dehaene, S., Bihan, D.L. 2007. Cerebral bases of subliminal and supraliminal priming
during
reading. Cerebral Cortex, 17: 2019–2029. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl110
[44] Lau, H.C., Passingham, R.E. 2007. Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the
human
prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(21): 5805–5811. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4335-

06.2007
[45] LeDoux, J.E. 1998. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York,
NY:
Simon & Schuster. ISBN: 978-0684836591, 384 p.
[46] Lia, T-T, Lu, Y. 2014. The subliminal affective priming effects of faces displaying various levels of
arousal: An
ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 583:148-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.09.027
[47] Lieberman, M.D. 2007. Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of
Psychology, 58: 259–289. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654
[48] Lowery, B., Eisenberger, N., Hardin, C., Sinclair, S. 2006. Long-term effects of subliminal priming on
academic
performance. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.937950. Available at: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-

research/workingpapers/long-term-effects-subliminal-priming-academic-performance
[49] Meltzer, J.A., Kielar, A., Panamsky, L., Deschamps, T., Leigh R.C. 2017. Electrophysiological
signatures of
phonological and semantic maintenance in sentence repetition. Neuroimage, 156: 302-314. DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.030
[50] Mladenović, Ž., Marković, Z., Ljajić, S. 2016. The Use of subliminal messages in marketing:
Experimental
examination. Socioeconomica, 5(9): 39–52. DOI: 10.12803/SJSECO.59005
[51] Mnegusso, P., Tsakiris, M., Schioth, H.B., Stein, J.D., Brooks, S.J. 2014. Subliminal versus supraliminal
stimuli
activate neural responses in anterior cingulate cortex, fusiform gyrus and insula: A meta-analysis of fMRI
studies, 2(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-014-0052-1

[52] Mohan, D. M., Kumar, P., Mahmood, F., Wong, K. F., Agrawal, A. et al. 2016. Effect of subliminal
lexical priming
on the subjective perception of images: A machine learning approach. Plos One, 11(2). DOI:
816
[53] Morsella, E., Godwin, C.A., Jantz, T.J., Krieger, S.C.,Gazzaley, A. 2016. Homing in on consciousness in
the
nervous system: An action-based synthesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39: e168. DOI:
10.1017/S0140525X15000643
[54] Newell, B.R., Shanks, D.R. 2014. Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. The
Behavioral
And Brain Sciences, 37(1): 1–19. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003214
[55] Ochsner, K.N., Lieberman, M.D. 2001. The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience. American
Psychologist, 56(9): 717–734. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.9.717
[56] O'Connel, B., Walden, S., Pohlmann, A. 2011. Marketing and neuroscience. What drives customer
decisions?
Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, White Paper. Available at: http://www.hoffman
marcom.com.
ama/white-papers/White%20Paper%20Neuroscience%20what%20drives%20cust%20descis ions.pdf
[57] Parkinson, J., Garfinkel, S., Critchley, H., Dienes, Z., Seth, A.K. 2016. Don’t make me angry, you
wouldn’t like
me when I’m angry: Volitional choices to act or inhibit are modulated by subliminal perception of
emotional
faces. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(2): 252-268. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0477-5
[58] Pavone, E.P., Marzi1, C.A., Girelli, M. 2009. Does subliminal visual perception have an error-
monitoring
system?. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30: 1424–1431. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06908.x
[59] Pegna, A.J., Landis, T., and Khateb, A. 2008. Electrophysiological evidence for early non-conscious
processing of fearful facial expressions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 70: 127–136. DOI:
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.08.007
[60] Pessiglione, M., Petrovic, P., Daunizeau, J., Palminteri, S., Dolan, R.J., and Frith, C.D. 2008, Subliminal
instrumental conditioning demonstrated in the human brain. Neuron, 59: 561–567. DOI:
10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.005
[61] Pichon, S., Guex, R., Vuilleumier, P. 2016. Influence of temporal expectations on response priming
by
subliminal faces. Plos One,11(10): e0164613. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0164613
[62] Pozharliev, R., Verbeke, W.J., Bagozzi, R.P. 2017. Social consumer neuroscience: Neurophysiological
measures of advertising effectiveness in a social context. Journal of Advertising, 46(3): 351–362. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1343162
[63] Pradeep, A. 2011. The Buying brain: Secrets to selling to the unconscious mind. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
ISBN:
9780470601778, 252 p.
[64] Prochnow, D., Kossack, H., Brunheim, S., Müller, K., Wittsack, Markowitsch, H-J, Seitz, R.J. 2013.
Processing
of subliminal facial expressions of emotion: A behavioral and FMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 8(5):
448–461.
DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2013.812536
[65] Rodilla, C.C., Beauducel, A., Leue, A. 2016. Error-related negativity and the misattribution of state-
anxiety
following errors: On the reproducibility of Inzlicht and Al-Khindi. Human Neuroscience, 10: 475. DOI:
10.3389/fnhum.2016.00475
[66] Ruch, S., Zust, M.A., and Henke, K. 2016. Subliminal messages exert long-term effects on decision-
making.
Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1: 1-9. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niw013. Available at:

https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2016/1/niw013/2757133
[67] Salgado-Montejo, A., Leon, I.T., Elliot, A.J., Salgado, C.J., and Spence, C. 2015. Smiles over frowns:
When
curved lines influence product preference. Psychology & Marketing, 32(7): 771–781. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20817
[68] Scherer, K.R., Shorr, A., Johnstone, T. 2001. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods,
Research.
Canary, NC: Oxford University Press, ISBN: 9780195351545. 496 p.

[69] Shalgi, S., Deouell, L.Y. 2013. Is there any electrophysiological evidence for subliminal error
processing?
Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7: 150. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00150
[70] Sidarus, N., Vuorre, M., Haggard, P. 2017. How action selection influences the sense of agency: An
ERP
study. NeuroImage, 150: 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015
817
[71] Sidorchuk, R. 2017. Study of the relationship between value orientations and consumer preferences
of young
consumers in Russia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, XII, Winter, 7(53): 2012-2027.
[72] Simmons, J.P., Nelson, L.D., Simonsohn, U. 2011. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in
data
collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11): 1359–
1366.
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611417632
[73] Smărăndescu, L., Shimp, T. 2015. Drink coca-cola, eat popcorn, and choose powerade: Testing the
limits of
subliminal persuasion. Marketing Letters, 26(4): 715–726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-

9294-1
[74] Smedt, B.D. 2014. Advances in the use of neuroscience methods in research on learning and
instruction.
Frontier Learning Research, 2(4): 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i4.115
[75] Smelser, N.J., Baltes, P.B. 2001. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
Ontario:
Elsevier Science. ISBN: 9780080548050
[76] Sweeny, T.D., Grabowecky, M., Suzuki, S., and Paller, K. A. 2009. Long-lasting effects of subliminal
affective
priming from facial expressions. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4): 929–938. DOI:
10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.011
[77] Teuchies, M., Demanet, J., Sidarus, N., Haggard, P., Stevens, M.A., Brass, M. 2016. Influences of
unconscious
priming on voluntary actions: Role of the rostral cingulate zone. NeuroImage, 135: 243–252. DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.036
[78] Theus, K. T. 1994. Subliminal advertising and the psychology of processing unconscious stimuli: A
review of
research. Psychology & Marketing, 11(3): 271–290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220110306
[79] Trappey, C. 1996. A meta-analysis of consumer choice and subliminal advertising. Psychology &
Marketing,
13(5): 517–553. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199608)13:5<517::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-

C
[80] Turner, B.O., Paul, E.J., Miller, M.B., Barbey, A.K. 2018. Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of
taskbased fMRI studies. Communications Biology, 1: 62. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-018-0073-z
[81] Uono, S., Satoa, W., Sawada, R., Kochiyama, T.,Toichi, M. 2018. Spatiotemporal commonalities of
frontoparietal activation in attentional orienting triggered by supraliminal and subliminal gaze cues: An
event-related
potential study. Biological Psychology, 136: 29–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.05.004
[82] Venkatraman, V., DimokaI, A., Pavlou, P.A., Vo, K., Hampton, W., Bollinger, B., Hershfield, H. E.,
Ishihara, M.,
Winer, R.S. 2015. Predicting advertising success beyond traditional measures: New insights from
neurophysiological methods and market response modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4): 436–
452.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0593
[83] Wang, L., Feng, C., Mai, X., Jia, L., Zhu, X., Luo, W., and Lou, Y. 2016. The impact of perceptual load
on the
non-conscious processing of fearful faces. Plos One, 11(5): e0154914. DOI:
[84] Wang, Y., Minor, M. 2008. Validity, reliability and applicability of psychophysiolgical techniques.
Psychology &
Marketing, 25(2): 197–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20206
[85] Wokke, M. E., van Gaal, S., Scholte, H.S., Ridderinkhof, K.R., Lamme, A.F.L. 2011. The flexible nature
of
unconscious cognition. Plos One, 6(9): e25729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025729
[86] Yokoyama, T., Noguchi, Y., Kita, S. 2013. Unconscious processing of direct gaze: Evidence from an
ERP
study. Neuropsychologia, 51(7): 1161-1168. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.002

[87] Zani, A., Biella, G., Proverbio, A.M. 2012. Brain imaging techniques: Invasiveness and spatial and
temporal
Resolution. Available at: https://erplabcnr.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/appendixf_edited-2012.pdf.
[88] Zurawicki, L. 2010. Nueromarketing, Exploring the Brain of the Consumer. London, UK: Springer.
ISBN: 978-
3-540-77829-5, 273p.
-References
1. Barutchu, A.; Spence, C.; Humphreys, G.W. Multisensory enhancement elicited by unconscious visual
stimuli. Exp. Brain Res. 2018, 236, 409–417. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Kawakami, N.; Miura, E.; Nagai, M. When you become a superman: Subliminal exposure to death-
related
stimuli enhances men’s physical force. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Lourenco, S.F.; Ayzenberg, V.; Lyu, J. A general magnitude system in human adults: Evidence from a
subliminal priming paradigm. Cortex 2016, 81, 93–103. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Dehaene, S.; Cohen, L. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends Cogn. Sci.
2011, 15,
254–262. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Murphy, S.T.; Zajonc, R.B. Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and
suboptimal
stimulus exposures. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1993, 64, 723. [CrossRef]
6. Erdelyi, M.H. Subliminal perception and its cognates: Theory, indeterminacy, and time. Conscious.
Cogn.
2004, 13, 73–91. [CrossRef]
Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 54 16 of 23
7. Greenwald, A.G.; Draine, S.C.; Abrams, R.L. Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic
activation.
Science 1996, 273, 1699–1702. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Saari, T.; Ravaja, N.; Laarni, J.; Turpeinen, M.; Kallinen, K. Psychologically targeted persuasive
advertising
and product information in e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on

Electronic
Commerce, Delft, The Netherlands, 25–27 October 2004; ACM: Delft, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 245–
254.
9. Ortells, J.J.; Kiefer, M.; Castillo, A.; Megías, M.; Morillas, A. The semantic origin of unconscious
priming:
Behavioral and event-related potential evidence during category congruency priming from strongly and
weakly related masked words. Cognition 2016, 146, 143–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Li, B.; Gao, C.; Wang, W.; Guo, C. Processing fluency hinders subsequent recollection: An
electrophysiological
study. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Ferrand, L.; New, B. Semantic and associative priming in the mental lexicon. In Mental Lexicon: Some
Words
to Talk about Words; Nova Science Publisher: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 25–43.
12. Bar, M.; Biederman, I. Subliminal visual priming. Psychol. Sci. 1998, 6, 464–469. [CrossRef]
13. Bartram, D. The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cogn. Psychol. 1974, 6, 325–356.
[CrossRef]
14. Biederman, I.; Cooper, E.E. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual
object
priming. Perception 1991, 20, 585–593. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Becker, S.; Moscovitch, M.; Behrmann, M.; Joordens, S. Long-term semantic priming: A
computational
account and empirical evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1997, 23, 1059. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Cave, C.B. Very long-lasting priming in picture naming. Psychol. Sci. 1997, 8, 322–325. [CrossRef]
17. Francken, J.; van Gaal, S.; de Lange, F. Immediate and long-term priming effects are independent of
prime
awareness. Conscious. Cogn. 2011, 20, 1793–1800. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Yoshimoto, S.; Imai, H.; Kashino, M.; Takeuchi, T. Pupil response and the subliminal mere exposure
effect.
PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90670. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Kwan, L.Y.Y.; Yap, S.; Chiu, C.-Y. Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for
personal preferences and trust. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2015, 129, 48–58. [CrossRef]
20. Stafford, T.; Grimes, A. Memory enhances the mere exposure effect. Psychol. Mark. 2012, 29, 995–
1003.
[CrossRef]
21. Kopp, B.; Mattler, U.; Goertz, R.; Rist, F. N2, p3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task
involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 99, 19–27.
[CrossRef]
22. Klotz, W.; Wolff, P. The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus.
Psychol. Res.
1995, 58, 92–101. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Klotz, W.; Neumann, O. Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.
J. Exp.
Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999, 25, 976–992. [CrossRef]
24. Vorberg, D.; Mattler, U.; Heinecke, A.; Schmidt, T.; Schwarzbach, J. Different time courses for visual
perception and action priming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6275–6280. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Schmidt, T.; Vorberg, D. Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation. Percept.
Psychophys.
2006, 68, 489–504. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. De Groot, A.M. Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target
pairs
and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1984, 36, 253–280. [CrossRef]
27. Beiderman, I.; Cooper, E.E. Size invariance in visual object priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept.
Perform.
1992, 18, 121–133. [CrossRef]
28. Jolicoeur, P. A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Mem. Cogn. 1987, 15, 531–543.
[CrossRef]
29. Besner, D. Visual pattern recognition: Size preprocessing reexamined. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1983, 35A,
209–216.
[CrossRef]
30. Bundesen, C.; Larsen, A. Visual transformation of size. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1975,
1,
31. Ellis, R.; Allport, D.A.; Humphreys, G.W.; Collis, J. Varieties of object constancy. Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
1989, 41A,
775–796. [CrossRef]
32. Jolicoeur, P.; Besner, D. Additivity and interaction between size ratio and response category in the
comparison
of size-discrepant shapes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1987, 13, 478–487. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 54 17 of 23
33. Larsen, A. Pattern matching: Effects of size ratio, angular difference in orientation, and familiarity.
Percept. Psychophys. 1985, 38, 63–68. [CrossRef]
34. Larsen, A.; Bundesen, C. Size scaling in human pattern recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept.
Perform.
1978, 4, 1–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Kosslyn, S.M. Aspects of a cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery. Science 1987, 240, 1621–1626.
[CrossRef]
36. Ullman, S. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition 1989, 32,
193–254.
[CrossRef]
37. Vaidya, C.J.; Gabrieli, J.D.; Monti, L.A.; Tinklenberg, J.R.; Yesavage, J.A. Dissociation between two
forms of
conceptual priming in alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 1999, 13, 516. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Reisberg, D. Cognition: Exploring the Science of the Mind; WW Norton: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
39. Mayr, S.B.; Axel, B. Negative priming as a memory phenomenon: A review of 20 years of negative
priming
research. J. Psychol. 2007, 215, 35–51. [CrossRef]
40. Bentin, S.; McCarthy, G.; Wood, C.C. Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming.
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 60, 343–355. [CrossRef]
41. Tipper, S.; Driver, J. Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task:
Evidence for
semantic processing of ignored stimuli. Mem. Cogn. 1988, 16, 64–70. [CrossRef]
42. Neill, W.T.V.; Leslie, A.; Terry, K.M.; Gorfein, D.S. Persistence of negative priming: Ii. Evidence for
episodic
trace retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992, 18, 993–1000. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Stanovich, K.E.W.; Richard, F. On priming by a sentence context. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1983, 112, 1–
36.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Berger, J.; Meredith, M.; Wheeler, S.C. Contextual priming: Where people vote affects how they
vote. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 8846–8849. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Cook, S.; Fallon, N.; Wright, H.; Thomas, A.; Giesbrecht, T.; Field, M.; Stancak, A. Pleasant and
unpleasant
odors influence hedonic evaluations of human faces: An event-related potential study. Front. Hum.
Neurosci.
2015, 9, 661. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Cook, S.; Kokmotou, K.; Soto, V.; Wright, H.; Fallon, N.; Thomas, A.; Giesbrecht, T.; Field, M.; Stancak,
A.
Simultaneous odour-face presentation strengthens hedonic evaluations and event-related potential

responses
influenced by unpleasant odour. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 672, 22–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Williams, M.A.; Morris, A.P.; McGlone, F.; Abbott, D.F.; Mattingley, J.B. Amygdala responses to
fearful
and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 2898–
2904.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Fazio, R.H.; Olson, M.A. Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use.
Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2003, 54, 297–327. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Milders, M.; Sahraie, A.; Logan, S. Minimum presentation time for masked facial expression
discrimination.
Cogn. Emot. 2007, 22, 63–82. [CrossRef]
50. Pessoa, L.; Japee, S.; Ungerleider, L.G. Visual awareness and the detection of fearful faces. Emotion
2005, 5,
51. Potter, M.C.; Wyble, B.; Hagmann, C.E.; McCourt, E.S. Detecting meaning in rsvp at 13 ms per
picture.
Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2014, 76, 270–279. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Karremans, J.; Stroebe, W.; Claus, J. Beyond vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and
brand
choice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 42, 792–798. [CrossRef]

53. Mohan, D.M.; Kumar, P.; Mahmood, F.; Wong, K.F.; Agrawal, A.; Elgendi, M.; Shukla, R.; Ang, N.;
Ching, A.;
Dauwels, J.; et al. Effect of subliminal lexical priming on the subjective perception of images: A machine
learning approach. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148332. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Kumar, P.; Mahmood, F.; Mohan, D.M.; Wong, K.; Agrawal, A.; Elgendi, M.; Shukla, R.; Dauwels, J.;
Chan, A.H. On the Effect of Subliminal Priming on Subjective Perception of Images: A Machine Learning
Approach. In Proceedings of the 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in
Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Chicago, IN, USA, 26–30 August 2014; pp. 5438–5441.
55. Lang, S.F.; Nelson, C.A.; Collins, P.F. Event-related potentials to emotional and neutral stimuli.
J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1990, 12, 946–958. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 54 18 of 23
56. Matsukawa, J.; Snodgrass, J.G.; Doniger, G.M. Conceptual versus perceptual priming in incomplete
picture
identification. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2005, 34, 515–540. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57. Battig, W.F.M.; William, E. Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories a replication and
extension of the
connecticut category norms. J. Exp. Psychol. 1969, 80, 1–46. [CrossRef]
58. Snodgrass, J.G.; Vanderwart, M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement,
image
agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 1980, 6, 174–215.
[CrossRef]
59. Shelton, J.R.; Martin, R.C. How semantic is automatic semantic priming? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem.
Cogn.
1992, 18, 1191. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60. Perea, M.; Rosa, E. The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
Psychol. Res.
2002, 66, 180–194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61. Neely, J.H. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings
and
theories. In Basic Processes in Reading; Routledge: London, UK, 2012; pp. 272–344.
62. Ansorge, U.; Klotz, W. Manual and verbal responses to completely masked (unreportable) stimuli:
Exploring
some conditions for the metacontrast dissociation. Perception 1998, 27, 1177–1189. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
63. Ansorge, U.; Neumann, O.; Becker, S.I.; Kälberer, H.; Kruse, H. Sensorimotor supremacy: Investigating
conscious and unconscious vision by masked priming. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 2007, 3, 257–274. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
64. Schmidt, T. The finger in flight: Real-time motor control by visually masked color stimuli. Psychol. Sci.
2002,
13, 112–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Schmidt, T.; Niehaus, S.; Nagel, A. Primes and targets in rapid chases: Tracing sequential waves of
motor
activation. Behav. Neurosci. 2006, 120, 1005–1016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66. Schmidt, T.; Schmidt, F. Processing of natural images is feedforward: A simple behavioral test.
Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2009, 71, 594–606. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
67. Mattler, U. Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis. Q. J.
Exp. Psychol. 2005, 58A, 577–601. [CrossRef]
68. Leuthold, H.; Kopp, B. Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related
brain
potentials. Psychol. Sci. 1998, 9, 263–269. [CrossRef]
69. Eimer, M.; Schlaghecken, F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and
electrophysiological evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1998, 24, 1737–1745. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
70. Eimer, M.; Schlaghecken, F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biol. Psychol.
2003,
64, 7–26. [CrossRef]
71. Mattler, U. Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 151,
272–288.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
72. Vath, N.; Schmidt, T. Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness
potentials. Neuroscience 2007, 145, 197–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73. Postman, L.; Keppel, G. Norms of Word Association; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
74. Voss, J.L.; Schendan, H.E.; Paller, K.A. Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences
electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming.
NeuroImage
2010, 49, 2879–2889. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75. Brown, C.M.; Hagoort, P. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Language; Brown, C.M., Hagoort, P., Eds.;
The Neurocognition of Language; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999; Volume 6.
76. Castle, P.C.; Van Toller, S.; Milligan, G.J. The effect of odour priming on cortical eeg and visual erp
responses.
Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2000, 36, 123–131. [CrossRef]
77. Watson, N.V.; Breedlove, S.M. The Mind’s Machine: Foundations of Brain and Behavior; Sinauer
Associates:
Sunderland, MA, USA, 2012.
78. Gibbons, H. Evaluative priming from subliminal emotional words: Insights from event-related
potentials
and individual differences related to anxiety. Conscious. Cogn. 2009, 18, 383–400. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79. Bruner, J.S.; Postman, L. Emotional selectivity in perception and reaction. J. Personal. 1947, 16, 69–
77.
[CrossRef]
-References
 Abrams, R. L., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of
meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118–124.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Anderson, A. K. (2005). Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting
awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 258–281.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Anderson, A. K., Christoff, K., Panitz, D. A., De Rosa, E., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). Neural correlates
of the automatic processing of threat facial signals. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5627–5633.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Anderson, A. K., & Phelps, E. A. (2001). Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception
of emotionally salient events. Nature, 411, 305–309.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Aquino, J. M., & Arnell, K. M. (2007). Attention and the processing of emotional words: Dissociating
effects of arousal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 430–435.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Arnell, K. M., Killman, K. V., & Fijavz, D. (2007). Blinded by emotion: Target misses follow attention
capture by arousing distractors in RSVP. Emotion, 7, 465–477.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The Celex Lexical Database[CD-ROM].
Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
o View In Article
 Bahrami, B., Carmel, D., Walsh, V., Rees, G., & Lavie, N. (2008a). Unconscious orientation processing
depends on perceptual load. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–10.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Bahrami, B., Carmel, D., Walsh, V., Rees, G., & Lavie, N. (2008b). Spatial attention can modulate
unconscious orientation processing. Perception, 37, 1520–1528.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Bahrami, B., Lavie, N., & Rees, G. (2007). Attentional load modulates responses of human primary
visual cortex to invisible stimuli. Current Biology, 17, 509–513.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Bernat, E., Bunce, S., & Shevrin, H. (2001). Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and
negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing. International Journal of
Psychophysiology, 42, 11–34.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang. P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I:
Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276–298.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Carrasco, M., & McElree, B. (2001). Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information
processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 5363–5367.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2003). On wildebeests and humans: The preferential detection of
negative stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 14–18.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Dijksterhuis, A., Corneille, O., Aarts, H., Vermeulen, N., & Luminet, O. (2004). Yes, there is a
preferential detection of negative stimuli: A response to Labiouse. Psychological Science, 15, 571–572.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Etkin, A. Klemenhagen, K., Dudman, J., Rogan, M., Hen, R., Kandel, E. R., et al. (2004). Individual
differences in trait anxiety predict the response of the basolateral amygdala to unconsciously processed fearful
faces. Neuron, 44, 1043–1055.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Gaillard, R., Del Cul, A., Naccache, L., Vinckier, F., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Nonconscious
semantic processing of emotional words modulates conscious access. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, USA, 103, 7524–7529.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Hamann, S. B., Ely, T. D., Grafton, S. T., & Kilts, C. D. (1999). Amygdala activity related to enhanced
memory for pleasant and aversive stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 289–294.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Huang, Y., Baddeley, A., & Young, A. W. (2008). Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated
by semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 328–
339.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Jackson, M. C., Wolf, C., Johnston, S. J., Raymond, J. E., & Linden, D. E. J. (2008). Neural correlates
of enhanced visual short-term memory for angry faces: An fMRI study. Public Library of Science One, 3, 1–10.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Jackson, M. C., Wu, C–Y., Linden, D. E. J., & Raymond, J. E. (2009). Enhanced visual short-term
memory for angry faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 363–
374.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Keil, A., & Ihssen, N. (2004). Identification facilitation for emotionally arousing verbs during the
attentional blink. Emotion, 4, 23–35.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Kihara, K., & Osaka, N. (2008). Early mechanism of negativity bias: An attentional blink
study. Japanese Psychological Research, 50, 1–11.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Labiouse, C. L. (2004). Commentary: Is there a real preferential detection of negative stimuli?
Psychological Science, 15, 364–365.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J.
B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp.
119–137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451–468.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 9, 75–82.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of attentional selection: Efficient visual search results in
inefficient rejection of distraction. Psychological Science, 8, 395–398.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Lavie, N., & Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1038–1052.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
 Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and
cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339–354.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual
attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 183–197.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 McGinnies, E. M. (1949). Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychological Review, 56, 471–482.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (1995). Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop
task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1595–1607.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Milders, M., Sahraie, A., Logan, S., & Donnellon, N. (2006). Awareness of faces is modulated by their
emotional meaning. Emotion, 6, 10–17.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Morris, J. S., Ohman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the
human amygdala. Nature, 393, 467–470.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal
and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723–739.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Naccache, L., Gaillard, R., Adam, C., Hasboun, D., Clémenceau, S., Daulac, M., et al. (2005). A direct
intracranial record of emotions evoked by subliminal words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
USA, 102, 7713–7717.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Ogawa, T., & Suzuki, N. (2004). On the saliency of negative stimuli: Evidence from attentional
blink. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 20–30.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Ohman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the
grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
 Pessoa, L. (2005). To what extent are emotional stimuli processed without attention and awareness?
Current Opinion of Neurobiology, 15, 188–196.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Pessoa, L., Japee, S., Sturman, D., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2006). Target visibility and visual awareness
modulate amygdala responses to fearful faces. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 366–375.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Neural processing of emotional
faces requires attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 11458–11463.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Pleyers, G., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based
analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency
awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130–144.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social
information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380–391.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in
an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 18, 849–860.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1997). The attentional Blink. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 1, 291–296.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Silvert, L., Delplanque, S., Bouwalerh, H., Verpoort, C., & Sequeira, H. (2004). Autonomic responding
to aversive words without conscious valence discrimination. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 53,
135–145.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Snodgrass, L. L., & Harring, K. E. (2005). Right hemisphere positivity bias in preconscious processing:
Data from five experiments. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 23, 318–335.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Thomas, S. J., Johnstone, S. J., & Gonsalvez, C. J. (2007). Event-related potentials during an
emotional Stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63, 221–231.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Clarke, K., Husain, M., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Neural
responses to emotional faces with and without awareness: Event-related fMRI in a parietal patient with visual
extinction and spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2156–2166.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on
face processing in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30, 829–841.
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Whalen, P. J., Rauch, S. L., Etcoff, N. L., McInerney, S. C., Lee, M. B., et al. (1998). Masked
presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. Journal of
Neuroscience, 18, 411–418.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
 Zeelenberg, R., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Rotteveel, M. (2006). The impact of emotion on perception:
Bias or enhanced processing?Psychological Science, 17, 287–291.
o PsycINFO
o Google Scholar
o View In Article
This research was supported by a Wellcome Trust award to N. Lavie.M. Nasrallah and D. Carmel
contributed equally to this work.Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed
toDavid Carmel, Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6
Washington Place, New York, NY 10003
Email: davecarmel@nyu.edu
Received April 8, 2008
Revision received March 26, 2009
Accepted April 21, 2009
References
Aarts H, Custers R, Marien H. Preparing and motivating behavior
outside of awareness. Science 2008;319:1639. http://doi.org/10.
1126/science.1150432.
Abadie M, Waroquier L, Terrier P. Gist memory in the
unconscious-thought effect. Psychol Sci 2013;24:1253–9. http://
doi.org/10.1177/0956797612470958.
Addante RJ. A critical role of the human hippocampus in an electrophysiological measure of implicit
memory. NeuroImage
2015;109:515–28. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.069.
Arzi A, Holtzman Y, Samnon P, et al. Olfactory aversive conditioning during sleep reduces cigarette-
smoking behavior. J
Neurosci 2014;34:15382–93. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.
2291-14.2014.
Arzi A, Shedlesky L, Ben-Shaul M, et al. Humans can learn new
information during sleep. Nat Neurosci 2012;15:1460–5. http://
doi.org/10.1038/nn.3193
Atas A, Faivre N, Timmermans B, et al. Nonconscious learning
from crowded sequences. Psychol Sci 2013. http://doi.org/10.
1177/0956797613499591.
Bergstro¨m F, Eriksson J. The conjunction of non-consciously perceived object identity and spatial
position can be retained during a visual short-term memory task. Conscious Res 2015;1470.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01470
Bermeitinger C, Goelz R, Johr N, et al. The hidden persuaders
break into the tired brain. J Exp Soc Psychol 2009;45:320–6.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.001
Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW. Constructive consumer choice processes. J Cons Res 1998;25:187–217.
http://doi.org/10.1086/209535
Capa RL, Cleeremans A, Bustin GM, et al. Long-lasting effect of
subliminal processes on cardiovascular responses and performance. Int J Psychophysiol 2011;81:22–30.

http://doi.org/10.1016/
j.ijpsycho.2011.04.001
Chen JCW, Li W, Lui M, et al. Left-frontal brain potentials index
conceptual implicit memory for words initially viewed subliminally. Brain Res 2009;1285:135–47.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.
brainres.2009.05.085
Chong TTJ, Husain M, Rosenthal CR. Recognizing the unconscious. Curr Biol 2014;24:R1033–5.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.
2014.09.035
Chun MM, Phelps EA. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with
hippocampal damage. Nat
Neurosci 1999;2:844–7. http://doi.org/10.1038/12222
Daltrozzo J, Claude L, Tillmann B, et al. Working memory is partially preserved during sleep. PLoS ONE
2012;7:e50997. http://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050997
Dew ITZ, Cabeza R. The porous boundaries between explicit and
implicit memory: behavioral and neural evidence. Ann NY
Acad Sci 2011;1224:174–90. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.
2010.05946.x
Dienes Z. Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to
Scientific and Statistical Inference. New York: Palgrave Macmillan,
2008.
Dienes Z. Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Quant Psychol Meas 2014;5:781.
http://doi.org/10.3389/
fpsyg.2014.00781
Dijksterhuis A, Bos MW, Nordgren LF, et al. On making the right
choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science
2006;311:1005–7. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121629.
Dijksterhuis A, Nordgren LF. A theory of unconscious thought.
Perspect Psychol Sci 2006;1:95–109. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-
6916.2006.00007.x.
Duss SB, Oggier S, Reber TP, et al. Formation of semantic associations between subliminally presented
face-word pairs.
Conscious Cogn 2011;20:928–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.
2011.03.018.
Duss SB, Reber TP, Hanggi J, € et al. Unconscious relational encoding depends on hippocampus. Brain
2014;137:3355–70. http://
doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu270.
Farooqui AA, Manly T. Anticipatory control through associative
learning of subliminal relations: invisible may be better than
visible. Psychol Sci 2015;26:325–34. http://doi.org/10.1177/
0956797614564191.
Ferrand L. The masked repetition priming effect dissipates when
increasing the inter-stimulus interval: evidence from word
naming. Acta Psychologica 1996;91:15–25. http://doi.org/10.1016/
0001-6918(95)00010-0.
Forster K, Booker J, Schacter DL, et al. Masked repetition priming:
lexical activation or novel memory trace? Bull Psychon Soc
1990;28:341–5. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334039.
Gaillard R, Cohen L, Adam C, et al. Subliminal words durably affect neuronal activity. NeuroReport
2007;18:1527–31. http://doi.
org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f0b6cd.
Garcıa-Orza J, Damas-Lopez J, Matas A, et al. “2 x 3” primes naming “6”: evidence from masked priming.
Atten Percept
Psychophys 2009;71:471–80. http://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.3.471
Greene AJ, Gross WL, Elsinger CL, et al. An fMRI analysis of the
human hippocampus: inference, context, and task awareness.
J Cogn Neurosci 2006;18:1156–73. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.
2006.18.7.1156
Greene AJ, Gross WL, Elsinger CL, et al. Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI
analysis of the contextual
cueing task. Learn Mem 2007;14:548–53. http://doi.org/10.1101/
lm.609807.
Greenwald AG, Draine SC, Abrams RL. Three cognitive markers
of unconscious semantic activation. Science 1996;273:1699–702.
http://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5282.1699
Greenwald AG, Klinger MR, Schuh ES. Activation by marginally
perceptible (“subliminal”) stimuli: dissociation of unconscious

from conscious cognition. J Exp Psychol-Gen 1995;124:22–42.
Hannula DE, Greene AJ. The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: at a tipping
point? Front Hum
Neurosci 2012;6. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00080.
Hannula DE, Ranganath C. The eyes have it: hippocampal activity predicts expression of memory in eye
movements. Neuron
2009;63:592–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.025.
Harand C, Bertran F, La Joie R, et al. The hippocampus remains
activated over the long term for the retrieval of truly episodic
memories. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e43495. http://doi.org/10.1371/jour
nal.pone.0043495.
Hassin RR. Yes it can: on the functional abilities of the human
unconscious. Perspect Psychol Sci 2013;8:195–207. http://doi.org/
10.1177/1745691612460684.
Hassin RR, Ferguson MJ, Shidlovski D, et al. Subliminal exposure
to national flags affects political thought and behavior. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:19757–61. http://doi.org/10.1073/
pnas.0704679104.
Henke K. A model for memory systems based on processing
modes rather than consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci
2010;11:523–32. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2850.
Subliminal messages—effects on decision-making | 7
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2016/1/niw013/2757133 by guest on 02

November 2020
Henke K, Buck A, Weber B, et al. Human hippocampus establishes associations in memory. Hippocampus
1997;7:249–56.
http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:3<249::AIDHIPO1>3.0.CO;2-G.
Henke K, Mondadori CRA, Treyer V, et al. Nonconscious formation and reactivation of semantic
associations by way of the
medial temporal lobe. Neuropsychologia 2003;41:863–76. http://

doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00035-6.
Henke K, Reber TP, Duss SB. Integrating events across levels of
consciousness. Front Behav Neurosci 2013;7:68. http://doi.org/10.
3389/fnbeh.2013.00068.
Hesselmann G, Moors P. Definitely maybe: can unconscious
processes perform the same functions as conscious processes? Conscious Res 2015;584.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.
2015.00584.
Holdstock JS, Mayes AR, Isaac CL, et al. Differential involvement
of the hippocampus and temporal lobe cortices in rapid and
slow learning of new semantic information. Neuropsychologia
2002;40:748–68. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00192-0.
Karpinski A, Yale M, Briggs JC. Unconscious arithmetic processing: a direct replication. Eur J Soc Psychol
2016; n/a-n/a. http://
doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2175.
Karremans JC, Stroebe W, Claus J. Beyond Vicary’s fantasies:
the impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. J Exp
Soc Psychol 2006;42:792–8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.
12.002.
Kawakami N, Yoshida F. Perceiving a story outside of conscious
awareness: when we infer narrative attributes from subliminal
sequential stimuli. Conscious Cogn 2015;33:53–66. http://doi.
org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.001.
Kiesel A, Wagener A, Kunde W, et al. Unconscious manipulation
of free choice in humans. Conscious Cogn 2006;15:397–408.
Klapp ST, Haas BW. Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli
on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus-response
associations. J Exp Psychol-Hum Percept Perform 2005;31:193–209.

http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.193.
Lau HC, Passingham RE. Unconscious activation of the cognitive
control system in the human prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci
2007;27:5805–11. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4335-06.
2007.
Levy BR, Pilver C, Chung PH, et al. Subliminal strengthening:
improving older individuals’ physical function over time
with an implicit-age-stereotype intervention. Psychol Sci
2014;2525:2127–35. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551970.
Lowery BS, Eisenberger NI, Hardin CD, et al. Long-term effects of
subliminal priming on academic performance. BASP
2007;29:151–7. http://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701331718.
McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O’reilly RC. Why there are complementary learning systems in the
hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist
models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev 1995;102:419–57.
Mealor AD, Dienes Z. Conscious and unconscious thought in artificial grammar learning. Conscious Cogn
2012;21:865–74.
Miller J. Measurement error in subliminal perception experiments: simulation analyses of two regression
methods. J Exp
Psychol-Hum Percept Perform 2000;26:1461–77.
Monahan JL, Murphy ST, Zajonc RB. Subliminal mere exposure:
specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychol Sci 2000;11:462–6.
http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00289.
Moscovitch M. Recovered consciousness: a hypothesis concerning modularity and episodic memory. J

Clin Exp Neuropsychol
1995;17:276–90. http://doi.org/10.1080/01688639508405123.
Mudrik L, Breska A, Lamy D, et al. Integration without awareness:
expanding the limits of unconscious processing. Psychol Sci
2011;22:764–70. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611408736.
Mudrik L, Faivre N, Koch C. Information integration without
awareness. Trends Cogn Sci 2014;18:488–6. http://doi.org/10.
1016/j.tics.2014.04.009.
Mudrik L, Koch C. Differential processing of invisible congruent
and incongruent scenes: a case for unconscious integration. J
Vis 2013;13:24. http://doi.org/10.1167/13.13.24.
Negash S, Kliot D, Howard DV, et al. Relationship of contextual
cueing and hippocampal volume in amnestic mild cognitive
impairment patients and cognitively normal older adults.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2015;21:285–96. http://doi.org/10.1017/
S1355617715000223.
Newell BR, Shanks DR. Unconscious influences on decision making: a critical review. Behav Brain Sci
2014;1–19. http://doi.org/
10.1017/S0140525X12003214.
Nieuwenstein MR, Wierenga T, Morey RD, et al. On making the
right choice: a meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage.
Judgm Decis Mak
2015;10:1–17.
Ocampo B. Unconscious manipulation of free choice by novel
primes. Conscious Cogn 2015;34:4–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.con
cog.2015.03.007.
Olsen RK, Moses SN, Riggs L, et al. The hippocampus supports
multiple cognitive processes through relational binding and
comparison. Front Hum Neurosci 2012;6:146. http://doi.org/10.
3389/fnhum.2012.00146.
Parkinson J, Haggard P. Subliminal priming of intentional inhibition. Cognition 2014;130:255–65.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogni
tion.2013.11.005.
Reber TP, DoLam A, Elger CE, et al. Intracranial EEG correlates of
implicit relational inference within the hippocampus.

Hippocampus 2016;26:54–66. http://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22490.
Reber TP, Henke K. Integrating unseen events over time.
Conscious Cogn 2012;21:953–60. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.
2012.02.013
Reber TP, Luechinger R, Boesiger P, et al. Unconscious relational
inference recruits the hippocampus. J Neurosci
2012;32:6138–48. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5639-11.
2012.
Reder LM, Park H, Kieffaber PD. Memory systems do not divide
on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding. Psychol Bull 2009;135:23–
49. http://doi.org/10.
1037/a0013974.
Reuss H, Kiesel A, Kunde W, et al. Unconscious activation of task
sets. Conscious Cogn 2011;20:556–67. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.
concog.2011.02.014.
Ruby P, Caclin A, Boulet S, et al. Odd sound processing in the
sleeping brain. J Cognitive Neurosci 2008;20:296–311. http://doi.
org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20023.
Ruch S, Koenig T, Mathis J, et al. Word encoding during sleep is
suggested by correlations between word-evoked up-states and
post-sleep semantic priming. Front Psychol 2014;5:1319. http://
doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01319.
Schlaghecken F, Eimer M. Masked prime stimuli can bias “free”
choices between response alternatives. Psychon Bull Rev
2004;11:463–8. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196596.
Shanks DR. Learning: from association to cognition. Annu Rev
Psychol 2010;61:273–301. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.
093008.100519.
Simonson I. In defense of consciousness: the role of conscious

and unconscious inputs in consumer choice. J Cons Psychol
2005;15:211–17. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1503_5.
8 | Ruch et al.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2016/1/niw013/2757133 by guest on 02

November 2020
Sklar AY, Levy N, Goldstein A, et al. Reading and doing arithmetic
nonconsciously. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012. http://doi.org/10.
1073/pnas.1211645109.
Squire LR, Zola SM. Structure and function of declarative and
nondeclarative memory systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
1996;93:13515–22.
Strahan EJ, Spencer SJ, Zanna MP. Subliminal priming and persuasion: striking while the iron is hot. J Exp
Soc Psychol
2002;38:556–68. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00502-4
Tononi G. An information integration theory of consciousness.
BMC Neurosci 2004;5:42. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-5-42.
Tulving E. Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annu Rev
Psychol 2002;53:1–25. http://doi.org/Article
Vadillo MA, Kostopoulou O, Shanks DR. A critical review and
meta-analysis of the unconscious thought effect in medical
decision making. Conscious Res 2015;636. http://doi.org/10.3389/
fpsyg.2015.00636.
Van den Bussche E, Van den Noortgate W, Reynvoet B.
Mechanisms of masked priming: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull
2009;135:452–77. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0015329.
van Gaal S, De Lange FP, Cohen MX. The role of consciousness in
cognitive control and decision making. Front Hum Neurosci
2012;6:121. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00121.
Van Opstal F, de Lange FP, Dehaene S. Rapid parallel semantic

processing of numbers without awareness. Cognition
2011;120:136–47. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.03.005.
Verwijmeren T, Karremans JC, Bernritter SF, et al. Warning: You
are being primed! The effect of a warning on the impact of subliminal ads. J Exp Soc Psychol
2013;49:1124–9. http://doi.org/10.
1016/j.jesp.2013.06.010.
Verwijmeren T, Karremans JC, Stroebe W, et al. The workings
and limits of subliminal advertising: the role of habits. J Cons
Psychol 2011;21:206–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.11.
004.
Vlassova A, Donkin C, Pearson J. Unconscious information
changes decision accuracy but not confidence. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 2014;111:16214–8. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.
1403619111.
Weinberger J, Westen D. RATS, we should have used Clinton:
subliminal priming in political campaigns. Polit Psychol
2008;29:631–51. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.
00658.x.
Zu¨ st MA, Colella P, Reber TP, et al. Hippocampus is place of interaction between unconscious and
conscious memories. PLoS
ONE 2015;10:e0122459. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
0122459.s
References
1. Baars, B. (1997) In the Theater of Consciousness: The Workspace of the Mind. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2001 reprint.
2. Buckley, K. W. (1982) The selling of a psychologist: John Broadus Watson and the
application of behavioral techniques to advertising. Journal of the History of the
Behavioral Sciences, 18, pp. 207-221.
3. Byrne, D. (1959). The effect of a subliminal food stimulus on verbal responses. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 43 (no.4), pp. 249-251.
4. Bermeitinger, C. R., Goelz, N., Johr, M., Neumann, U.K.H., Ecker, R. Doerr (2009) The
hidden persuaders break into the tired brain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
45, pp. 320-326.
5. Champion, J.M., W.W. Turner (1959) An experimental investigation of subliminal
perception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, no. 6, pp. 382-384.
6. Chessman, J., Merikle, P. M. (1984) Priming with and without awareness. Perception and
Psychophysics 36 (4), pp. 387–395.
Željko Mladenović et al.
The use of subliminal messages in marketing: experimental examination
Page52
7. Cooper, J., G. Cooper (2002) Subliminal motivation: a story revisited. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 32, no. 11, pp. 2213-2227.
8. Dunlap, K. (1900) The effect of imperceptible shadows on the judgment of distance.
Psychological Review, 7, pp. 435-453.
9. Eskenazi, J., & Greenwald, A.G., Pratkanis, A.R. (1990). What you expect is what you
believe (but not necessarily what you get): On the ineffectiveness of subliminal self-help
audiotapes. Unpublished manuscript. University of California. Santa Cruz.
10. Freud, S. (1913). The Interpretation of Dreams, Third Edition. Trans. by A. A. Brill. New
York: The Macmillan Company, Bartleby.com, 2010.
11. Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. SE.
12. Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. SE.
13. Hollingworth, H. L. (1913). Advertising and Selling. New York: D. Appleton.
14. Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W., & Claus, J. (2006) Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact
of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42,
792−798.
15. McConnell, J.V., R.L. Cutler, E.B. McNeil (1958) Subliminal stimulation: an overview.
American Psychologist, 13, no. 5, pp. 229-242.
16. Merikle, P. M. (2000) Subliminal Perception. In Encyclopedia of Psychology (Vol. 7).

New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 497-499.
17. Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D., and Eastwood, J. D. (2001) Perception without awareness:
perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition 79, pp. 115–134.
18. Moore, T.E. (1982) Subliminal advertising: what you see is what you get. Journal of
Marketing, 46, no. 2, pp. 38-47.
19. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983) Central and peripheral routes to
advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer
Research, 10, pp. 134-148.
20. Packard, V. (1957). The hidden persuaders. New York: D. McKay Co.
21. Potter, C. M.,Wyble, B., Hagmann C.E., McCourt, & S. E., (2014) Detecting meaning in
RSVP at 13 ms per picture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, no.2, pp. 270-279.
22. Rogers, M., K.H. Smith (1993) Public perceptions of subliminal advertising: why
practitioners shouldn’t ignore this issue. Journal of Advertising Research, pp. 10-18.
23. Snodgrass, M., Bernat, E. & Shevrrin, H. (2004) Unconscious perception at the objective
detection threshold exists. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, no. 5, pp.888-889.
24. Scripture, E.W. (1897). The New Psychology. London: Walter Scott, LTD.
25. Strahan, E.J., S.J. Spencer, M.P. Zanna (2002) Subliminal priming and persuasion: striking
while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, pp. 556-568.
26. Trappey, C. (1996) A meta-analysis of consumer choice and subliminal advertising.
Psychology & Marketing, 13, no. 5, pp. 517-530.
27. Watson, J. B. (1922). What cigarette are you smoking and why? The J. Walter Thompson
News Bulletin, 88, pp. 1-17.
28. Wheat, K.L., Cornelissen, P.L., Frost, S.J., & Hansen, P.C. (2010) During visual word
recognition phonology is accessed within 100 ms and may be mediated by a speech
production code: Evidence from MEG. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 5229-5233.
29. Zanot, E.J., Pincus, J.D. Lamp, E.J. (1983) Public perceptions of subliminal advertising.
Journal of Advertising, 12, no. 1, pp. 39-45.
-REFERENCES
AVSEC, A., 2012, Do emotionally intelligent

individuals use more adaptive decision making
styles? Studia Psychologica, 54, 3, 209-220.
BALOTA, D.A., 1983, Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 88-104.
DAMASIO, A.R., 2000, Descartův omyl: Emoce,
rozum a lidský mozek, Praha: Mladá fronta.
DEBNER, J.A., JACOBY, L.L., 1994, Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 2, 304-317.
DELL’ACQUA, R., GRAIGNER, J., 1999, Unconscious semantic priming from pictures. Cognition, 73, B1-
B15.
DRAINE, S.C., GREENWALD, A.G., 1998, Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 3, 286-
303.
FOWLER, C.A., WOLFORD, G., SLADE, R.,
TASSINARY, L., 1981, Lexical access with and without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 110, 341-362.
ISEN, A.M., DAUBMAN, K.A., NOWICKI, G.P.,
1987, Positive affect facilitates creative problem
solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 6, 1122-1131.
KARREMANS, J.C., STROEBE, W., CLAUS, J.,
2006, Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of
subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 792-798.
KIHLSTROM, J.F., MULVANEY, S., TOBIAS,
B.A., TOBIS, I.P., 2000, The Emotional Unconscious. In: E. Eich (Ed.), Cognition and Emotion.
New York: Oxford University Press.
KUNST-WILSON, W.R., ZAJONC, R.B., 1980,
Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be
recognized. Science, 207, 4430, 557-558.
MCCAULEY, C., PARMELEE, C.M.,

SPERBER, R.D., CARR, T.H., 1980, Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to
conscious identification. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
6, 265-276.
MERIKLE, P.M., DANEMAN, M., 1998, Psychological investigations of unconscious perception. Journal of
Consciousness Studies, 5, 1, 5-
18.
MERIKLE, P.M. REINGOLD, E.M., 1991,
Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit)
measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and
Cognition, 17, 224-233.
MERIKLE, P.M., REINGOLD, E.M., 1998, On
demonstrating unconscious perception: Comment
on Draine and Greenwald. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 127, 3, 304-310.
MERIKLE, P.M., 2000, Subliminal perception.
In: A.E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology
(Vol. 7). New York: Oxford University Press.
MURPHY, S.T., ZAJONC, R.B., 1993, Affect,
cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with
optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5,
723-739.
270 STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 54, 2012, 4
PILÁRIK, Ľ., SARMÁNY-SCHULLER, I., 2009,
Emotional intelligence and decision making of female students of social work in Iowa Gambling Task.
Studia Psychologica, 51, 4, 319-328.
PILÁRIK, Ľ., SARMÁNY-SCHULLER, I., 2011,
Personality predictors of decision making of

medical rescuers. Studia Psychologica, 53, 2, 175-
184.
SARMÁNY-SCHULLER, I., 2010, Decision
making under time pressure in regard to preferred cognitive style (analytical-intuitive) and
study orientation. Studia Psychologica, 52, 4, 285-
290.
SARMÁNY-SCHULLER, I., KURAČKA, P.,
2012, Dimension of the cognitive style “analytical-intuitive” and the successful problem solving
in the “IGT” experimental situation. Studia
Psychologica, 54, 2, 95-109.
ŠPOK, D., 2007a, Nevědomá percepce: Metody
a koncepce. Dizertačná práca, Katedra psychologie,
Fakulta sociálních studií, Masarykova Univerzita,
Brno, Česká republika.
ŠPOK, D., 2007b, Výzkum nevědomé percepce
metodou analýzy nesprávných odpovedí: Identifikace číslic. Československá Psychologie, 51, 5, 489-
502.
ŠVECOVÁ, V., SARMÁNY-SCHULLER, I., 2005,
Vybrané aspekty podprahovej stimulácie - kritické
poznámky a experiment. Diplomová práca,
Univerzita Konštatntína Filozofa, Nitra.
ZAJONC, R.B., 2000, Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In:
J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of
affect in social cognition (pp. 31-58). Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press.
ZAJONC, R.B., 2001, Mere exposure: A gateway
to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 6, 224-228.
WINKIELMAN, P., BERRIDGE, K.C.,
WILBARGER, J.L., 2005, Unconscious affective

reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of
value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
31, 1, 121-135.

References

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

References

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Barral, O., Aranyi, G., Kouider, S., Lindsay, A., Prins, H., Ahmed, I., Jacucci, G.

, Negri, P., Gamberini,

Sidis, B.: The psychology of suggestion. D. Appleton, New York

Fox, R., Herrmann, J.: Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry

Almeida, J., Mahon, B.Z., Nakayama, K., Caramazza, A.: Unconscious

Breitmeyer, B.G., Ganz, L.: Implications of sustained and transient

Bouma, H.: Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Levi, D.M.: Crowding–an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a

Pelli, D.G., Tillman, K.A.: The uncrowded window of object recognition.

Bonneh, Y.S., Cooperman, A., Sagi, D.: Motion-induced blindness in

Neisser, U.: The control of information pickup in selective looking. In:

Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F.: Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional

Simons, D.J., Levin, T.: Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1,

Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.L., Arnell, K.M.: Temporary suppression of

Kunst-Wilson, W.R., Zajonc, R.B.: Affective discrimination of stimuli that

Faivre, N., Berthet, V., Kouider, S.: Nonconscious influences from

Devine, P.G.: Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled

Strahan, E.J., Spencer, S.J., Zanna, M.P.: Subliminal priming and

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.

Social Psychology, 45(2), 320–326.

of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 865–869.

conscious instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478.

Cognitive Science, 10(5), 204–211.

Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1268–1294.

Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296–309.

and Social Psychology, 84, 148–164.

cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 22–42.

appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1–23.

Psychology, 42, 792–798.

Cognition: An International Journal, 15(2), 397–408.

International Journal, 16(1), 63–83.

of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 193–209.

behavior (pp. 599–618). NY: Guilford.

Motivation, 39, 136–145.

Psychological Science, 22(11), 1381–1385.

1240 M. Milyavsky et al. / Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2012) 1232–1241

the iron is cold. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 49–56.

thought. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd edition,

ed. by E.T. Higgins and A. Kruglanski, 138–175. New York: Guilford.

Bargh, J.A. 2002. Losing consciousness: Automatic influences on consumer

judgment, behavior, and motivation. Journal of Consumer Research

European Journal of Social Psychology 36(2):147–168.

guild to priming and automaticity research. In Handbook of Research

Judd, 253–285. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bargh, J.A., M. Chen, and L. Burrows. 1996. Automaticity of social behavior:

Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(2):230–244.

and interpretation. Journal of Advertising 18(3):4–8.

Available online at www.nytimes.com.

Cooper, J., and G. Cooper. 2002. Subliminal motivation: A story revisited.

Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(11):2213–2227.

New York: Oxford.

Dijksterhuis, A., T. L. Chartrand, and H. Aarts. 2007. Effects of priming and

Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes, ed. by J.A. Bargh,

51–131. New York: Psychology Press.

Attention, subjective experience, and automatic social behavior. In The

by H. Bless and J.P. Forgas, 37–51. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

The unconscious consumer: Effects of environment on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer

Dijksterhuis, A., R. Spears, T. Postmes, D.A. Stapel, W. Koomen, A. van

Knippenberg, and D. Scheepers. 1998. Seeing one thing and doing

another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and

Social Psychology 75(4):862–871.

components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(1): 5–18.