Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OP 4070 Reporting of OVA
OP 4070 Reporting of OVA
1.1 This policy is formulated for all Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) staff for reporting
occurrences, variances and accidents (OVA) through HMC Electronic Incident Reporting
System (EIRS).
2.0 DEFINITIONS:
2.2 Near Miss - Any process variation that did not affect an outcome but for which a
recurrence carries a significant chance of a serious adverse outcome.
2.3 Occurrence - An event that results in a loss to a third party due to bodily injury, or
property damage or destruction.
2.4 Variance - A difference between what is expected and what actually occurs; an event
that departs from expectations; an act contrary to a usual rule.
2.5 Accident - An unplanned, unexpected, and undesirable event, which occurs suddenly
and results in damage, injury or harm.
2.5.1 Although human error is commonly the final event before the incident or
accident happens, a faulty process or system is almost always the root
cause that permits or compounds the harm and should be the focus of
improvement.
2.6 Negligence: is the act of omission in the treatment or care of a patient by any of the
healthcare professional, which deviates from the accepted standard of care.
2.7 Severity level 1, negligible: Events/error that can cause no negative consequences or
no erroneous output.
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
2.11 Severity level 5 sentinel: Events/error or catastrophic that results in unexpected death
and or major permanent loss of functions.
2.12 Misused – The use of the system incorrectly. Improper or misusing by entering
deliberately whether incomplete incident reports, reporting of the same incidents,
multiple entry of incomplete incident reports, irrelevant or non-OVA reports and the like.
2.13 Abused – A mistreat or abuse. An abuse of authority being the File Manager. Treating
any EntryUsers badly or harshly for personal gain; Preventing and threatening the
EntryUsers when reporting an incident; Falsification of incident report; Closure or
deleting unviewed incident reports or closure or deleting incident reports that are not
reviewed.
2.14 Access Rights – Any individual who has a valid HMC User ID and a Password has the
ability to access the system while in the HMC premises or resident. The permission
that is granted to an EntryUser or to an application as defined in; (see
Procedure/Process: 3.5 Responsibilities of Standard User in the System.)
2.15 Risk Assessment – is a systematic and effective method of identifying risks and
determining the most cost-effective means to minimize or remove them. It is an essential
part of any risk management Programme, and it encompasses the processes of risk
analysis and risk evaluation.
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
2.16 Risk Matrix – is a matrix that is used during risk assessment to define the level
of risk by considering the category of probability or likelihood against the category of
consequence severity. This is a simple mechanism to increase visibility of risks and
assist management decision making.
3.0 PROCEDURE/PROCESS:
3.1 Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) shall support a fair, just and transparent method of
dealing with incidents of occurrences, variances and accidents (OVA) in all its facilities.
3.2 All incidents of occurrences, variances and accidents (OVA), including near misses, shall
be reported, recorded, investigated and monitored, to provide a valuable opportunity for
maximizing the lessons learned from the outcomes of the events and to minimize
recurrences of similar events in the future.
3.2.1 The completion of the OVA reports shall be confidential, and may be made
anonymously and the outcomes of the investigations shall focus on the
systems and processes that have contributed to the particular incident or
event.
3.3 An occurrence variance and accident (OVA) report should immediately be initiated and
completed within 24 hours by the employee who first identifies the incident or near miss,
regardless of whether or not he or she was personally involved in the incident. (see
Appendix A – OVA Reporting Process Map).
3.3.1 If the incident is discovered at a later time, the employee who witnessed or
has knowledge of the incident should complete the report within 24 hours.
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
3.4 The OVA report should be completed as soon as it is practical, but no later than 24 hours
and the report should contain the facts of the incident and should clearly and factually
identify any harm that resulted to the patient, employee or visitor.
3.5 The employee involved, or who witnessed the incident, should complete the OVA report
and record the facts of the incident:
3.5.1 Complete the details by selecting the options applicable to the incident type of the
OVA being reported;
3.5.2 Select the Facility/Service, Unit/Department and Section as the location of the
employee where he/she discovered the incident;
3.5.3 Select the Other Service(s)/Dept.(s) Involved where the incident occur or the origin
of the incident other than the location of the employee where he /she discovered
and reporting the incident;
3.5.5 Record what immediate action was taken following the event to make the situation
safe and to prevent an immediate recurrence;
3.5.6 Document the facts of the incident also in the Nursing Notes, and/or
Physician Progress Notes in the Patient’s Medical Record.
3.6 The completed OVA report should be notified to the Section/Unit Head before
submission to ensure that the reported information is complete and any action taken to
protect patients, staff or visitors is recorded.
3.7 Anonymous Reporting where the staff member can select an option to report the incident
without his/her personal identification. Anonymity can prompt the staff members to report
an incident without fear of sanction, scrutiny and without fear confronting the supervisor.
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
3.8.2.7 Create auto reports, if File Manager A has access to the full
application and not just web for
3.8.2.8 Create tasks
3.8.2.9 Create alerts, if File Manager A has access to the full application
and not just web form
3.8.2.10 Notify the Risk Management Section immediately and submit the
case review summary should Serious and Sentinel Events
happened in his/her Facility/Hospital
3.8.4.1 Follow up OVA reports with severity level 3 for action plan,
implement, monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the action
and or its recommendation
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
3.9 The Risk Management Section of Quality & Patient Safety Department shall:
3.9.3 Liaise with the Department involved in the accident or occurrence, in order
to initiate an investigation if necessary.
3.9.6 Review / delete Incident Reports that has been “Save as Incomplete”
three (3) days or seventy two (72) hours after the Entered Date
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
3.9.7 Conduct risk level and assign severity level on all OVA reports using
consequence rating, likelihood rating, level of the risk , monitor and
evaluate trends that pose risks to patients, visitors and staff (see Appendix
B – Risk Assessment Matrix).
3.9.7.3 The results of the Root Cause Analysis and the action plans
should be submitted to the Risk Management Section for
monitoring and evaluating liaised with the Quality Reviewers in
each facility.
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
3.10 All incidents reported with actual severity level 1 & 2 negligible / minor harm damage
should be reported for trending, study and quality improvement purposes.
3.11 All incidents reported with actual severity level 3, 4 and 5 must be preceded by a
preliminary review report within 3 working days.
3.12 All incidents reported with actual severity level 3, moderate harm damage must be
preceded by local department investigations and or Peer Review. Review by File
Managers and submit the reports electronically to Risk Management Section within 10
working days.
3.13 All incidents reported with actual severity level 4 & 5 serious harm damage / events or
error results in death (sentinel event) must be preceded by Corporate Investigation
Committee, Adverse Medical Outcome Committee (AMOC), Managing Director and
Chief Medical Office (CMO). (refer to OP 4055)
3.14 Only specifically authorized staff may speak with the media or external bodies about an
incident and then only under the direction of the Managing Director’s Office. Under no
circumstances are any other HMC employees or contracted staff allowed to discuss
any aspect of any incident with the media or with any external person or organization not
bound by the Hamad Medical Corporation duty of confidentiality.
3.15 OVA reports are confidential documents that should not be placed in the patient’s
electronic medical record, and the completion of an OVA report should not be referred to
in the Electronic Medical Record.
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
3.16.3 In cases resulting in employee injury, the employee should be made safe
by transferring him/her to Staff Medical Center or the Emergency
Department (ED) as appropriate for their needs per HMC policy CL 7263.
3.17.2 The equipment involved in the incident should be removed from service,
clearly tagged as ‘OUT OF SERVICE - DO NOT USE’, isolated in a room
not normally associated with the use of that equipment, and left in exactly
the same state as it was at the time of the incident. No changes of any
type should be made to the fittings or settings, and under no
circumstances should staff attempt to repair the faulty equipment.
3.17.3 The equipment should not be used until it is checked and released for
service by Biomedical Engineering Department.
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
3.18.1 The Risk Management Section of Quality & Patient Safety Department will
compile, collate, and trend the data over time from all OVA reports and
incidents received for each month, and submit the findings, conclusions,
and/or recommendations quarterly and annually.
3.18.2 The quarterly reports of the incidents from the Risk Management Section
should be made available to the Hospital/Entity Chief Executive Officer,
Executive Director for the Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS)
Committee in the facility/entity and/or relevant departments for their own
internal monitoring of the incidents/events.
3.18.3 Quarterly and annual reports of the incidents should be submitted to the
Managing Director, Chief of Medical Academic and Research Affairs,
Deputy Chief – Medical Education, Medical Academic and Research
Affairs, Hospital/Entity Chief Executive Officer – Executive Director, Chief,
Tertiary Hospital Group, Chief General Hospital Group, Chief Continuing
Care Group, for the effectiveness of actions taken in response to OVA and
their impact on preventing and/or reducing their occurrences.
4.0 DOCUMENTATION:
4.1 Document the facts of the incident and the actions taken to stabilize and ensure
patient safety in the Nurses Progress Notes, and/or Physician Progress Notes in
the Patient’s Medical Record.
5.0 REFERENCES:
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
POLICY/PROCEDURE
7.0 ATTACHMENTS:
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
APPENDIX A
OVA REPORTING PROCESS MAP
OP 4070 Reporting Of Occurrences, Variances And Accidents Regulatory, Accreditation and Compliance Services (RACS)
APPENDIX B
RISK ASSESSMENT SCORING MATRIX
Table 1 Consequence scores (C) (Severity) and examples of the score descriptors
1 2 3 4 5
Domains Negligible Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
Impact on the safety Minimal injury Minor injury or Moderate injury Major injury leading Incident leading to
of patients, staff or requiring illness, requiring requiring to long-term death
public no/minimal minor intervention professional incapacity/disability
(physical/psychologi intervention or intervention Multiple permanent
cal harm) treatment. Requiring time off Requiring time off injuries or
work for >3 days Requiring time off work for >14 days irreversible health
No time off work work for 4-14 days effects
Increase in length Increase in length of
of hospital stay by Increase in length hospital stay by >15 An event which
1-3 days of hospital stay by days impacts on a large
4-15 days number of patients
Mismanagement of
RIDDOR/agency patient care with
reportable incident long-term effects
An event which
impacts on a small
number of patients
OP 4070 Reporting Of Occurrences, Variances And Accidents Page 1 of 3 Regulatory, Accreditation & Compliance Services (RACS)
1 2 3 4 5
Domains Negligible Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
Human resources/ Short-term low Low staffing level Late delivery of key Uncertain delivery Non-delivery of key
organisational staffing level that that reduces the objective/ service of key objective/service
development/staffing/ temporarily service quality due to lack of staff objective/service due to lack of staff
competence reduces service due to lack of staff
quality (< 1 day) Unsafe staffing Ongoing unsafe
level or Unsafe staffing level staffing levels or
competence (>1 or competence (>5 competence
day) days)
Loss of several key
Low staff morale Loss of key staff staff
Statutory duty/ No or minimal Breech of statutory Single breech in Enforcement action Multiple breeches in
inspections impact or breech of legislation statutory duty statutory duty
guidance/ statutory Multiple breeches in
duty Reduced Challenging statutory duty Prosecution
performance rating external
if unresolved recommendations/ Improvement Complete systems
improvement notice notices change required
Business objectives/ Insignificant cost <5 per cent over 5–10 per cent over Non-compliance Incident leading >25
projects increase/ schedule project budget project budget with national 10–25 per cent over
slippage per cent over project budget
Schedule slippage Schedule slippage project budget
Schedule slippage
Schedule slippage
Key objectives not
Key objectives not met
met
Finance including Up to QR 250, 000 QR 250,000 to QR QR 1M to 5M loss QR 5M to QR 25M QR 25M+ loss or
claims loss or loss of 1M loss or loss of or loss of loss or loss of loss of opportunity
opportunity for opportunity for opportunity for opportunity for for income
income income income income
Non-delivery of key
objective/ Loss of
>1 per cent of
Purchasing failing to budget
pay on time
Failure to meet
OP 4070 Reporting Of Occurrences, Variances And Accidents Page 2 of 3 Regulatory, Accreditation & Compliance Services (RACS)
1 2 3 4 5
Domains Negligible Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
specification/
slippage
Loss of contract /
payment by results
Likelihood
Likelihood score 1 2 3 4 5
Rare Unlikely Possible Likely Almost certain
Consequence
Score
5 Catastrophic 5 10 15 20 25
4 Major 4 8 12 16 20
3 Moderate 3 6 9 12 15
2 Minor 2 4 6 8 10
1 Negligible 1 2 3 4 5
For grading risk, the scores obtained from the risk matrix are assigned grades as follows:
OP 4070 Reporting Of Occurrences, Variances And Accidents Page 3 of 3 Regulatory, Accreditation & Compliance Services (RACS)