Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MANILA, Philippines – The full and proper implementation of the Juvenile Justice and Welfare
Act, not the lowering the age of criminal responsibility, will help children at risk and in conflict
with the law from committing crimes, Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council (JJWC) policy and
research officer Jackielou Bagadiong said on Thursday, August 23.
“The JJWC advocates for the full implementation first of the law because there are still
a lot of misconceptions of the Juvenile Justice and Welfare act – that the child always
gets away with whatever crime he or she does but its not true,” Bagadiong said during
the Department of Education’s first national child protection summit.
Bagadiong said proposals from lawmakers on lowering the age of criminal responsibility
from 15 years old to a “compromise” of 12 years old relied on reports that “hype” the
idea of children in conflict with the law. (DSWD chief: Lower age of criminal liability 'anti-
poor,' won't curb crime)
Lawmakers earlier proposed to lower the criminal age of responsibilty, saying adult
criminals purposely make use of youth to commit heinous crimes, knowing they cannot
be held criminally liable.
“The child still has this liability but we don't detain them because given the current state
of our jails, it wouldn't be possible, it would harm our future generation if we do that,”
she said.
Republic Act 9344 or the Juvenile Justice Law of 2006 sets the minimum age of criminal
liability at 15 years old. This means that those between 15 to 18 years old may be
detained in youth centers and go through rehabilitation programs. Those under 15 years
old are exempted from criminal liability and undergo intervention.
To put children in jail would be like putting them in “schools of crime,” Bagadiong said.
“Our jails in the Philippine setting (are) what we can call school(s) of crime. If a child
enters jail, one can be assured that when he or she comes out, she will have had a
network of criminals that can assist him or her later on,” she said.
There are a number of bills in the House of Representatives seeking to lower the
criminal age of responsibility. A counterpart bill seeking to exempt children under 12
years old from criminal liability has also been filed in the Senate.
MANILA, 20 May 2019 – Today, the Senate will debate the proposal to lower the
minimum age of criminal responsibility.
UNICEF supports the call of the Council for the Welfare of Children, civil society
organizations, professional associations, child protection experts, well-meaning citizens,
parents and the youth: Do not to lower the minimum age of criminal responsibility.
Congress must support the full implementation of the Juvenile Justice and
Welfare Act. Children in conflict with the law are already victims of circumstance,
mostly because of poverty and exploitation by adults. Children need access to
rehabilitation services because they deserve a second chance. They need to be
protected and not further penalized.
UNICEF makes this urgent call today – on the 13th anniversary of the Juvenile Justice
and Welfare Act – and reiterates its commitment to promote the rights of all children,
including children in conflict with the law and children-at-risk. As we celebrate this
milestone, let us be reminded that all children must be treated with dignity and
accorded their inalienable rights with utmost respect and protection.
Adopted on 20 May 2006 and amended in 2013, RA 9344 or the Juvenile Justice and
Welfare Act (JJWA) promotes the creation of a child-friendly justice system focused on
rehabilitation and restoration rather than punishment. It upholds the basic principle that
a child must not be treated as an adult as enshrined in the United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child (CRC) signed and ratified by the Philippines: "the child, by
reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care,
including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth."
The law makes it clear – without a doubt – that there is a need for a separate
juvenile justice system where detention is the last resort. The erring child must be
rehabilitated and reintegrated into society if the child must take responsibility for his or
her action and mend the broken relationship with the community and the victim.
The proper implementation of JJWA has led to many success stories (Children Not
Criminals) proving that children in conflict of the law can be rehabilitated without
resorting to imprisonment or detention. UNICEF has been working with local
governments, civil society organizations, executive and administrative bodies, the
Supreme Court, and children themselves to fully implement the law to protect children’s
rights – whether the child is the victim, the offender, or a community member.
But beyond the accolades and the recognition of the international community, the value
of this law lies in how it has changed the lives of many Filipino children who were
given a second chance in life. The JJWA does not see children in conflict with the law
as criminals. Rather, it regards them as victims of their circumstances. This law has
given these children hope – to change, to become better, and to work for a brighter
future.
Despite limited resources and support, the implementing bodies and civil society groups
are doing their best to strengthen and improve the system. UNICEF commends the
efforts of these implementing bodies, including the Juvenile Justice and Welfare
Council, in their efforts to fully and effectively implement the law. It is hoped that the
JJWC will continue to align with children’s welfare and be driven by the best interests of
the child. UNICEF continues to work with child rights groups in safeguarding the rights
of children and ensuring access to rehabilitation opportunities.
Recently, there have been efforts to undermine the impact of the Juvenile Justice and
Welfare Act by proposing to lower the minimum age of criminal responsibility. Using
misleading information, there are those who claim that the law has failed. But this is not
a fact. The law cannot fail if it is fully and effectively implemented. Lowering the
minimum age of criminal responsibility is not the answer. Putting children in prison or
detaining them will only cause more harm to the child and to the community.
UNICEF urges the Philippine Government to celebrate the 13th anniversary of the
Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act by upholding the rights and best interests of the
children and to lead the full and effective implementation of the law. It is, without
question, an ideal policy which exemplifies the highest level of child protection.
We call on the Government to work with child rights defenders and strengthen the
juvenile justice system for the sake of all Filipino children.
When a minor commits a crime it is addressed differently in the court system. Special courts and
judges are set up for handling juvenile delinquency cases. This is done to protect the minors from
the harsh realities of adult court and sentencing.
It is the belief of the legal system that minors who commit crimes are not completely aware of their
actions. They believe the thought and decision-making process of a minor is not fully developed and
the court wishes to approach these cases in a different manner. In many circumstances, a minor can
overcome the crime that was committed and go on to lead an adult life that is crime-free.
It is only under special circumstances that the court will allow a minor to be tried as an adult because
the system prefers rehabilitating minors instead of punishment.
The House already passed a bill seeking to lower the age of criminal liability from the
current 15 years old to 12 – higher than the 9 years of age that the committee approved.
The bill is still pending at the Senate but has a chance of approval when Congress
resumes in May after the 2019 elections. (READ: No time for Congress to pass bill on
age of criminal liability before polls)
Critics strongly oppose this, saying there is no scientific evidence that a lower age of
criminal responsibility will lead to less crimes. Instead of running after kids, the
government should fully implement the Juvenile Justice Act of 2006, which was later
amended and strengthened in 2013. (READ: Children in conflict with the law: Cracks in
Juvenile Justice Act)
Rappler met Angelo and Vincent, two former CICLs, who were successfully rehabilitated
and reintegrated into society, partly due to the proper implementation of the law and the
help of their communities.
The two have different cases and backgrounds, and as such, underwent different
interventions and programs.
Angelo, now 21, was accused of physical and mental abuse when he was 17. He was
subjected to a two-year community-based disposition program.
Vincent, now 18, was accused of frustrated homicide when he was 17 and underwent a
diversion program inside Bahay Pag-Asa.
Vincent, then a porter at a tiangge in Malabon, was 17 when he was charged with
frustrated homicide. It all happened after work past midnight. Vincent said and his co-
workers decided to eat after a hard day’s work but as they made their way to an eatery,
they got caught up in a riot.
"We were on our way to the eatery. We later on found out that barangay officials were
supposed to stop us because there was an ongoing riot in the area. But they weren't
able to catch us.... Two of my friends were mauled. We told the people there, 'We are
not your enemies.' I thought the man would shake my hand but he suddenly punched
me. My friends got mad and that's when a full-blown riot ensued," Vincent said in
Filipino.
During the ruckus, he stabbed another minor in the stomach. The victim survived and
charged him with frustrated homicide.
"I was about to be stabbed in the back but I dodged it. The man dropped the knife so I
picked it up and stabbed him to defend myself.... I went straight to the barangay hall to
seek assistance for my victim. I was brought to the women's desk. At the time, I was
even laughing at the police because I thought nothing would happen to me because I
was a minor. I apologized to the victim but he did not accept it. I was then brought to
Bahay Pag-Asa," he said.
Vincent admitted to being a shabu and marijuana user at the age of 13 and said he
would often hurt his parents back then.
He said he reached only third grade because his parents could not afford to send him
and his 3 other siblings to school.
At 13, he got his girlfriend pregnant but their baby died after 6 and a half months. Prior
to entering Bahay Pag-Asa, they had another baby, who is now over a year old.
"I started taking drugs at 13 years old. It continued for 3 years. My mother would always
lecture me. She would tell me that I was already so thin that I might get swept by the
wind. She would cry but I would just swear at her. I would always talk back to my father.
My siblings and I always fight. We had our first child, maybe the kid died at 6-and-a-half
months because of that. I only cared about my vices," he said in Filipino.
While lawmakers, in pushing for their bill, said CICLs would not be kept in jails with adult
criminals, the conditions in Bahay Pag-Asa are still difficult for children. Conditions
depend on the quality of centers built by local government units.
“Marami po akong natutunan sa Bahay Pag-Asa pero mahirap pa rin po dahil siyempre
'di mo na kayang gawin mga ginagawa mo sa labas. Mahirap po mag-adjust (I learned
a lot at Bahay Pag-Asa but it was still difficult because of course you could not do what
you're used to doing outside. It was difficult to adjust)," he said.
Ramos said they have yet to see a Bahay Pag-Asa with a school. Currently, CICLs in
these centers are subjected to the Department of Education’s Alternative Learning
System.
"We are preparing them to become responsible citizens. How can they be if they will get
used to one facility? Even if it's Bahay Pag-Asa, their movements are still restricted
there," Ramos said in Filipino.
The court ordered Vincent to first undergo a diversion program before deciding on the
case. A CICL needs to undergo it after the minor is found liable, without having to resort
to formal court proceedings.
As part of his diversion program, Vincent had to attend activities and seminars on
therapeutic communication, anger management, life skills, and parenting, among
others.
Vincent himself saw his transformation. If it weren’t for the support of the local
government and social workers, he said he wouldn't know where he would end up in.
Vincent noted his personal improvement after he entered Bahay Pag-Asa. "There are
no vices there. You need to follow them. They respect and understand us. They are
also kind to us. With the help of God, maybe it happened to me because I needed to
change my life," Vincent recalled.
"My life had no direction. It's was like a dead end for me. I neglected my family. I had no
tinge of hope in my life.... If I did not enter the facility, I might be stuck in my old ways
until now. I'm thankful to them. Without them, my second chance in life would not be
successful," he added in Filipino.
Ramos shared the same view and cited Vincent's transformation in the youth center.
This, she said, prompted the court to cut short his program to 7 months. On January
2018, he was set free.