Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Staining pattern
Histone dsDNA
Ro/SS-A
Sm U1 RNP
Scl-70
La/SS-B
U1 RNP
Figure 1
SRP, signal recognition particle; PR-3, proteinase 3, MPO, myeloperoxidase; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide.
Table 1
whilst pANCA-MPO occurs in microscopic polyangiitis and Churg cirrhosis), chronic infection (subacute bacterial endocarditis),
Strauss syndrome but is less specific.4 There are a number of other viral infection and lymphoproliferative disease. Detection of an
antigens associated with pANCA (e.g. lactoferrin) but with less autoantibody in an unexpected situation should prompt a careful
clinical significance. Ideally both IIF and ELISA for PR3 and MPO clinical review for features of the suggested disease. Equally the
should be performed on each sample. absence of an autoantibody should not lead to the discarding of
the diagnosis if the clinical features are sufficiently clearcut and
supported by other evidence such as histology. About 15% of
Autoantibodies in the monitoring of disease activity
healthy adults and 8% of children have detectable ANA, usually
Serial detection of autoantibodies has a limited role in the in low titre. The frequency of ANA in normal people is higher in
assessment of disease activity. Rising levels of dsDNA antibodies women and increases with age so that around 25% of women
in patients with SLE may correlate with increasing disease activ- over the age of 60 years are positive.
ity. Similarly an increase PR3-ANCA levels occurs in patients with Most routine laboratories offer testing for the antibodies
active Wegener’s granulomatosis. However, in both situations described above. Specialist reference laboratories may also offer
the rise in antibody level can precede clinical relapse by many a broader range of tests in line with their research interests. ◆
months and in some patients fall immediately prior to the relapse,
suggesting tissue deposition. The detection of a rise in titre should
serve to heighten suspicion and an increase in the frequency of
review, rather than a reflex increase in immunosuppression. References
1 Zendman A J W, van Venrooji W J, Pruijn G J M. Use and significance
of anti-CCP antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2006;
When to request autoantibody tests
45: 20–5.
The detection of autoantibodies is a key part of the assessment 2 Damoiseaux J G, Cohen Tervaert J W. From ANA to ENA how to
of the patient with suspected autoimmune rheumatic disease. In proceed? Autoimmun Rev 2006; 5: 10–17.
over 95% of patients with untreated active SLE, ANA can be 3 Trendelenburg M. Antibodies against C1q in patients with SLE.
detected using HEp-2 cells. Patients with autoimmune disease Springer Semin Immunopathol 2005; 27: 276–85.
may present with a systemic multisystem illness or be non- 4 Hagen E C, Andrassy K, Csernok E et al. The diagnostic value of
specifically unwell. Such patients should be tested for the pres- standardised assays for ANCA in idiopathic systemic vasculitis:
ence of autoantibodies. However, screening for ANA should not results of an international collaborative study. Kidney Int 1998; 53:
be used indiscriminately. The probability of a positive result is 743–53.
dependent on the prior probability of the disease in question.
Where that is low there is an increased chance of a false positive
result. The positive predictive value of ANA in SLE is around Further reading
11%. ANA are not specific for autoimmune rheumatic disease Giles I, Isenberg D A. Antinuclear antibodies; an overview. In: Wallace D J,
and can occur in other conditions such as organ specific autoim- Hahn B H, eds. Dubois’ lupus erythematosus. 5th ed. Baltimore:
mune disease (primary autoimmune cholangitis, primary biliary Williams and Wilkins, 2001.