You are on page 1of 4

ASSESSING THE PATIENT

Autoantibodies in the What’s new?


autoimmune rheumatic • The major development during the last five years has

diseases been the recognition of the utiliy of antibodies directed


against cyclic citrullinated peptides in the diagnosis
of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This has led to
Richard Watts
a re- evaluation of traditional methods of diagnosing
rheumatoid arthritis

• There is increasing awareness of the possible role of


anti-C1q antibodies in the assessment of patients with
Abstract lupus nephritis
The detection of autoantibodies to a variety of antigenic targets plays
an important role in the diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disease. • The trend towards the increased use of ELISAs has
Rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibodies have been key in the diag- continued due to the easy automation of these assays
nosis of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus for many
years. There have been several developments over the past 5 years.
Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides (CCP) have been shown
to be specific for rheumatoid arthritis and may predict the development
Rheumatoid factor
of erosive disease. This assay will probably become widely used over
the next few years. There is increasing interest in the use of anti-C1q Rheumatoid factor (RF) is, primarily, an IgM antibody that is
antibodies for the detection and monitoring of renal nephritis as this as- directed against the Fc part of the patient’s own IgG molecules.
say appears to be more sensitive than anti-DNA antibodies. ELISA based Rheumatoid factors are traditionally detected using an agglutina-
assays are being increasingly used in place of both radioimmunoassay tion assay with gelatin particles coated with denatured IgG, but
and immunofluorescence because they readily automated and less de- increasingly ELISAs are being used. Although 80% of patients
pendent on the use of experienced technicians. with rheumatoid arthritis are RF positive, these antibodies are
not specific for rheumatoid arthritis and occur in a wide range of
Keywords autoantibodies; ANA; rheumatoid factor; ANCA; anti-CCP autoimmune rheumatic diseases and infections.
­antibodies; ELISA

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies


The detection of autoantibodies in the serum of patients with The relatively poor specificity of traditional RF assays for RA has
suspected autoimmune rheumatic disease is an important part of led to the development of new serological markers. The most
the diagnostic process. The clinical utility of the results is depen- promising of these are antibodies directed against citrullinated
dent on the quality of the laboratory test. Increasingly, assays are antigens.1 The citrulline moiety, which is the key component
available commercially and this can bring problems of standard- of the antigenic determinant that is post-translationally gener-
ization. Access to a reference laboratory is essential in difficult ated by peptidylarginine deaminases. ELISA assays have been
cases particularly when there is a discrepancy between the clini- developed to detect antibodies against cyclic citrullinated pep-
cal features and the laboratory results. tides. Anti-CCP antibodies are present in 80% of patients with
An ideal diagnostic test has both high sensitivity and specific- established RA. The specificity is around 95–98%, with a sensi-
ity, that is, it identifies all patients with the disease (high sensitiv- tivity of 65%. Furthermore, a positive anti-CCP test appears to
ity) and is not present in those who do not have the disease (high predict the development of erosive RA and this predictive value
diagnostic specificity). A number of different methods are used ­complements that of RF.
to detect autoantibodies with varying specificity and sensitivity.
The most widely used methods are indirect ­immunofluorescence
Antinuclear antibodies
(IIF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ELISAs
can be readily automated and therefore are readily suited for use Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are autoantibodies directed against
in a routine non-specialized laboratory. They may be quantified. cellular proteins or nucleic acids.2 Despite the name, a number of
In general, they are more sensitive and less specific than other these antigens are partly or wholly confined to the cell cytoplasm.
methods such as immunoprecipitation or immuno-electrophore­ sis. The most frequently occurring ANA react with DNA-­protein or
Increasingly, ELISA assays are replacing other methods in ­routine RNA-protein complexes. These autoantibodies, which are usually
laboratories. high titre, high affinity IgG antibodies, are generated by a T-cell
dependent process driven by the autoantigen.
Screening for ANA is an important initial stage in the assess-
Richard Watts MA DM FRCP is a Consultant Rheumatologist at Ipswich ment of autoimmune rheumatic disease. High titre ANA (>1:160)
Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich, UK, and Senior Lecturer at the School of are more likely to be clinically significant in the presence of
Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, UK. autoimmune rheumatic disease. The test is usually performed
Competing interests: none declared. by IIF on fresh frozen sections of rodent liver and/or kidney,

MEDICINE 34:11 441 © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


ASSESSING THE PATIENT

or on ­cultured human cell lines such as HEp-2. HEp-2 cells are


Antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens
preferred because individual cells and their organelles are easily
observed. They divide rapidly and present antigens, which are Detection of antibodies against the extractable nuclear antigens
only sparsely present or absent in the resting nuclei of tissue (ENA) is useful in the diagnosis of several autoimmune ­rheumatic
sections. diseases.2 The clinical associations of these autoantibodies are
Amongst the RNA-protein complex targets, anti-Ro antibodies given in Table 1. These antibodies were traditionally detected
are directed against the human antigen and may not be detected using immunodiffusion techniques, although ELISAs are now
on rodent sections. Several immunofluorescence staining pat- very widely used. Enzyme digestion studies showed that these
terns occur, reflecting different antigenic specificities (Figure 1). antigens were sensitive to RNase and trypsin and are composed
The IIF ANA may be falsely negative if the antigen is located of ribonucleoprotein (RNP). The Sm (or Smith antigen; Sm, Ro
outside the cell nucleus (e.g. anti-Jo-1 and anti-ribosomal P), or and La antigens were each named after the first two letters of
if the antigen is present in a form not recognized by the autoan- the surname of the patients in whom antibodies to them were
tibody (e.g. anti-Ro directed against epitopes on the Ro molecule first found), is resistant to RNase and trypsin. The RNP antigenic
not expressed in cultured HEp-2 cells). determinants are found in association with U1 RNA, whereas
The assay requires an experienced technician to read the slides Sm determinants are present on U1,U2 and U4-6 RNA. The other
and results are prone to subjective interpretation, therefore, in two important nuclear antigens are Ro and La, these are identical
many non-specialized laboratories ELISA assays are being used to the independently identified antigens Sjögren’s syndrome A
to detect ANA. These assays vary in sensitivity and specificity (SS-A) and Sjögren’s syndrome B (SS-B).
both between different ELISA assays and between ELISA and IIF. Antibodies against tRNA synthetases have been identified in
IIF remains the gold standard. patients with polymyositis. The tRNA synthetases are cytoplas-
mic enzymes that attach tRNA to its corresponding amino acid
during the assembly of polypeptides. Antibodies against several
Anti-DNA antibodies
tRNA synthetases have been described, including antiJo-1 (histi-
The detection of antibodies to double stranded (ds) DNA is cen- dyl), PL-&7 (threonyl), PL-12 (alanyl), OJ (isoleucyl), EJ (glycl)
tral to the diagnosis of SLE. Anti-dsDNA antibodies rarely occur and KS (asparginyl. AntiJo-1 (histidyl) is the most common hav-
in other diseases. In contrast, antibodies to single-stranded DNA ing been found in up to 30% of patients with myositis. Patients
are found in wide variety of autoimmune and infectious condi- with these autoantibodies often share the same clinical features;
tions. Anti-dsDNA antibodies can be detected using several meth- the tRNA synthetase syndrome -Raynaud’s phenomenon, fever,
ods. The most specific is IIF using the haemoflagellate Crithidiae interstitial lung disease, arthralgia and myositis. The tRNA syn-
lucillae that has a kinetoplast containing circular dsDNA, and thetases are located in the cytoplasm and hence are often not
this is considered the ‘gold standard’. The ELISA is rapid, sensi- detected on routine ANA testing, although a perinuclear staining
tive, quantifiable although less specific than the Crithidia assay, pattern on IIF ANA may be a clue to their presence.
but is dependent on the use of pure dsDNA. Radioimmunoas- Anti-topoisomerase-1 antibodies (Scl-70) are associated with
says are also available commercially but increasingly laborato- the diffuse cutaneous variant of scleroderma and a high risk of pul-
ries are trying to reduce the use of test that involve radioisotopes monary disease. Topoisomerase-1 is a100kDa nucleolar enzyme
for safety reasons and ELISA anti-dsDNA assays are commonly involved in uncoiling DNA prior to replication. Other enzymes
­performed. targeted in scleroderma (such as RNA polymerase I, II and III)

Diagnostic algorithm for antinuclear antibody positivity

Staining pattern

Homogeneous Speckled Nucleolar Centromere


Speckled
PCNA Homogeneous

Histone dsDNA
Ro/SS-A

Sm U1 RNP
Scl-70
La/SS-B

U1 RNP

Drug-induced lupus Systemic lupus Sj gren’s syndrome Mixed connective Scleroderma


erythematosus erythematosus tissue disease

Figure 1

MEDICINE 34:11 442 © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


ASSESSING THE PATIENT

Disease associations of commonly detected autoantibodies

Autoantibody Disease Prevalence Disease specificity Associated clinical features

dsDNA SLE 70% High Lupus nephritis


Sm SLE 5% (Caucasian); 30-50% High Vasculitis, CNS lupus
(African-Caribbean)
Ro (SS-A) SLE 40% Low Photosensitivity, subacute cutaneous LE,
congenital heart block, neonatal LE
Sjögren’s syndrome 80% High Extra-glandular disease, vasculitis,
lymphoma
La (SS-B) SLE 15% Low As for Ro
Sjögren’s syndrome 50% High As for Ro
U1RNP SLE 30% Low Raynaud’s phenomenon, swollen fingers,
arthritis, myositis (overlap syndrome –
MCTD)
rRNP SLE 15% High CNS lupus (psychosis, depression)
PCNA (cyclin) SLE 5% High
Phospholipid SLE 35% High Thrombosis, fetal loss, thrombocytopenia
C1q SLE 40% Moderate Lupus nephritis
Topoisomerase 1 Systemic sclerosis 30% High Diffuse cutaneous variant of scleroderma
Centromere Systemic sclerosis 30% Moderate Limited cutaneous variant of
scleroderma, absence of lung disease
RNA-polymerases Systemic sclerosis 20% High Diffuse cutaneous variant of scleroderma,
visceral involvement
PM-SC1 Systemic sclerosis 5% High Scleroderma/polymyositis overlap
Jo-1 Polymyositis 30% High Polymyositis with fibrosing alveolitis
(anti-synthetase syndrome)
SRP Polymyositis 4% High Severe myositis
Mi-2 Polymyositis 10% High Dermatomyositis
CCP Rheumatoid arthritis 80% High Rheumatoid arthritis
PR-3 Vasculitis 90% High Wegener’s granulomatosis
MPO Vasculitis 50% Moderate Microscopic polyangiitis, Churg Strauss
syndrome

SRP, signal recognition particle; PR-3, proteinase 3, MPO, myeloperoxidase; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide.

Table 1

are also nucleolar and are associated with an increased risk of


Anti-C1q antibodies
cardiac and renal disease with a poor prognosis. Anti-cen­tromere
antibodies (detected by IIF on HEp-2 cells) are specific for the C1q is the first component of the classical pathway of comple-
limited cutaneous variant of scleroderma and react with the ment activation, hereditary deficiency is a risk factor for SLE.
kinetochore of metaphase chromosomes. Antibodies against C1q are present in the serum of patients with
SLE (up to 47%) and are associated with renal involvement.
Monitoring anti-C1q may be useful to detect renal flares.3
Antiphospholipid (anticardiolipin) antibodies
Antibodies to phospholipids particularly cardiolipin are responsi-
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
ble for the false positive Wasserman reaction and lupus anticoagu-
lant seen in patients with the primary antiphospholipid antibody Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) were first detected
syndrome (APS) and in some patients with SLE. The interaction of in the sera of patients with systemic vasculitis in the early 1980s.
phospholipid and a co-factor β2-glycoprotein is necessary for the ANCA are specific for granule proteins of neutrophils and mono-
detection of the antigenic site to be available for binding of anti- cytes. Using IIF on ethanol fixed human neutrophils two major
body. Antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with an increased staining patterns are observed: cytoplasmic and perinuclear. Two
risk of vascular thrombosis, recurrent fetal loss, livedo reticularis main antigenic targets have been identified ­ proteinase 3 (PR3),
and thrombocytopaenia. A positive IgG anticardiolipin test present which is associated with cANCA and ­ myeloperoxidase (MPO)
on more than one occasion at least 6 weeks apart is most specific which is associated with pANCA. The combination of cANCA
for APS, but some patients are only IgM antibody positive. and PR3 is highly specific (>90%) for Wegener’s granu­lomatosis

MEDICINE 34:11 443 © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


ASSESSING THE PATIENT

whilst pANCA-MPO occurs in microscopic polyangiitis and Churg cirrhosis), chronic infection (subacute bacterial endocarditis),
Strauss syndrome but is less specific.4 There are a ­number of other viral infection and lymphoproliferative disease. Detection of an
antigens associated with pANCA (e.g. lactoferrin) but with less autoantibody in an unexpected situation should prompt a careful
clinical significance. ­Ideally both IIF and ELISA for PR3 and MPO clinical review for features of the suggested disease. Equally the
should be performed on each sample. absence of an autoantibody should not lead to the discarding of
the diagnosis if the clinical features are sufficiently clearcut and
supported by other evidence such as histology. About 15% of
Autoantibodies in the monitoring of disease activity
healthy adults and 8% of children have detectable ANA, usually
Serial detection of autoantibodies has a limited role in the in low titre. The frequency of ANA in normal people is higher in
­assessment of disease activity. Rising levels of dsDNA ­antibodies women and increases with age so that around 25% of women
in patients with SLE may correlate with increasing disease activ- over the age of 60 years are positive.
ity. Similarly an increase PR3-ANCA levels occurs in patients with Most routine laboratories offer testing for the antibodies
active Wegener’s granulomatosis. However, in both ­ situations described above. Specialist reference laboratories may also offer
the rise in antibody level can precede clinical relapse by many a broader range of tests in line with their research interests. ◆
months and in some patients fall immediately prior to the relapse,
suggesting tissue deposition. The detection of a rise in titre should
serve to heighten suspicion and an increase in the frequency of
review, rather than a reflex increase in ­immunosuppression. References
1 Zendman A J W, van Venrooji W J, Pruijn G J M. Use and significance
of anti-CCP antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2006;
When to request autoantibody tests
45: 20–5.
The detection of autoantibodies is a key part of the assessment 2 Damoiseaux J G, Cohen Tervaert J W. From ANA to ENA how to
of the patient with suspected autoimmune rheumatic disease. In proceed? Autoimmun Rev 2006; 5: 10–17.
over 95% of patients with untreated active SLE, ANA can be 3 Trendelenburg M. Antibodies against C1q in patients with SLE.
detected using HEp-2 cells. Patients with autoimmune disease Springer Semin Immunopathol 2005; 27: 276–85.
may present with a systemic multisystem illness or be non- 4 Hagen E C, Andrassy K, Csernok E et al. The diagnostic value of
­specifically unwell. Such patients should be tested for the pres- standardised assays for ANCA in idiopathic systemic vasculitis:
ence of autoantibodies. However, screening for ANA should not results of an international collaborative study. Kidney Int 1998; 53:
be used indiscriminately. The probability of a positive result is 743–53.
dependent on the prior probability of the disease in question.
Where that is low there is an increased chance of a false positive
result. The positive predictive value of ANA in SLE is around Further reading
11%. ANA are not specific for autoimmune rheumatic disease Giles I, Isenberg D A. Antinuclear antibodies; an overview. In: Wallace D J,
and can occur in other conditions such as organ specific autoim- Hahn B H, eds. Dubois’ lupus erythematosus. 5th ed. Baltimore:
mune disease (primary autoimmune cholangitis, primary biliary Williams and Wilkins, 2001.

MEDICINE 34:11 444 © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

You might also like