Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brief Cover Alcantara

    Uploaded by

    APSSAT ACCOUNTING DIVISION
    32 views2 pages
    This document is a brief for the petitioner-appellant in the case of Felix V. Alcantara Jr. v. Maria Carmela Nieto-Alcantara. It summarizes the statement of the case, statement of facts, issues to be resolved, and arguments for two assignments of error. The petitioner-appellant argues that the respondent-appellee is not psychologically incapacitated as defined by Article 36 of the Family Code and that the solemnizing officer was authorized to solemnize their marriage under Article 35 of the Family Code. The brief cites relevant case law and code articles and requests that the lower court's decision be resolved in favor of the petitioner-appellant.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    brief cover alcantara

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a brief for the petitioner-appellant in the case of Felix V. Alcantara Jr. v. Maria Carmela Nieto-Alcantara. It summarizes the statement of the case, statement of facts, issues to be resolved, and arguments for two assignments of error. The petitioner-appellant argues that the respondent-appellee is not psychologically incapacitated as defined by Article 36 of the Family Code and that the solemnizing officer was authorized to solemnize their marriage under Article 35 of the Family Code. The brief cites relevant case law and code articles and requests that the lower court's decision be resolved in favor of the petitioner-appellant.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    32 views2 pages

    Brief Cover Alcantara

    Uploaded by

    APSSAT ACCOUNTING DIVISION
    This document is a brief for the petitioner-appellant in the case of Felix V. Alcantara Jr. v. Maria Carmela Nieto-Alcantara. It summarizes the statement of the case, statement of facts, issues to be resolved, and arguments for two assignments of error. The petitioner-appellant argues that the respondent-appellee is not psychologically incapacitated as defined by Article 36 of the Family Code and that the solemnizing officer was authorized to solemnize their marriage under Article 35 of the Family Code. The brief cites relevant case law and code articles and requests that the lower court's decision be resolved in favor of the petitioner-appellant.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    CA G.R. No.

    CV – 111017

    Republic of the Philippines


    COURT OF APPEALS
    Manila

    oooooooooooooooOooooooooooooooo

    FELIX V. ALCANTARA JR.,


    Petitioner-Appellant,

    - versus -

    MARIA CARMELA NIETO-ALCANTARA,


    Respondent-Appellee.

    ******************************************************

    BRIEF FOR THE PETITIONER-APPELLANT

    ******************************************************

    APSSaT Law Office & Associates


    CU01A Alicante Tower, Marquinton Condominiums,
    Sumulong Hi-way cor. Toyota Avenue, Barangay
    Sto. Niño, Marikina City
    Email address: apssat.lawofc@yahoo.com
    Telephone Nos. 504-8465

    oooooooooooooooOooooooooooooooo
    ii

    SUBECT INDEX

    Page

    Assignment of Errors 1

    Statement of the Case 1-3

    Statement of the Facts 3-9

    Issues to be Resolved 9

    Argument 9 - 17

    Discussion of the first assignment of error

    Defendant-Appellee is not psychologically incapacited to perform her marital


    obligations under Article 36 of the Family Code 9 - 15

    Discussion of the second assignment of error

    The solemnizing officer is authorized to solemnize marriage between Roman


    Catholics and not falling under Article 35 paragraph 2 of the Family Code
    15 - 17

    Relief 18

    Regional Trial Court Decision 20 - 24

    Resolution 25 - 27

    Affidavit of Service 28

    Case Cited

    Camacho-Reyes vs. Reyes. G.R. No. 1856286, August 18, 2010 13

    Brenda B. Marcos vs. Wilson G. Marcos, G.R. No. 136490. Oct 19, 2000 13

    Law Cited

    Article 36 of the Family Code 1, 9 and 17

    Article 68 of the Family Code 12

    Article 35 paragraph 2 of the Family Code 15 and 17

    Article 7 of the Family Code 16

    You might also like