CANCELLATION OF LEGAL ENCUM- BRANCE UNDER SECTION 7 OF RA 26 ON THE TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NOS. 006-2020000165 AND 006- 2020000166 OF THE REGISTRY OF DEEDS OF MAKATI CITY,
LRC Case No. _________
OFELIA BRAVO-QUESITAS and SHEILA CHRISTINE BRAVO GUERRERO Petitioner. x---------------------------------------x
PETITION
Petitioners, OFELIA BRAVO-QUESITAS and SHEILA
CHRISTINE BRAVO GUERRERO, through the undersigned counsel, unto this Honorable Court, respectfully states that:
1. Petitioners are of legal age, Filipino citizens and residing and
with postal address at ____________________________;
2. Petitioners are the registered owner of parcel of land covered
by Transfer Certificate of Title Nos. 006-2020000165 and 006- 2020000166 of the Registry of Deeds of Makati City, certified true copy of the aforesaid titles are hereto attached as ANNEX “A” and “B” respectively; 3. The office of the Register of Deeds of Makati City is impleaded as a necessary party, with office address at 5 th floor, New Makati City Hall, J.P. Rizal Avenue, Corner F. Zobel Street, Makati City where it may be served with summons and other court processes of the Honorable court;
4. The said parcel of lands in the name of OFELIA BRAVO-
QUESITAS and SHEILA CHRISTINE BRAVO GUERRERO are more particularly described as follows:
Transfer Certificate of Title N0. 006-2020000165
“A PARCEL OF LAND (LOT NO. 11, SUB-BLOCK
NO. 11, OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN PSD-17574, BEING A PORTION OF BLOCK NO. 13 DESCRIBED ON PLAN PSD-17083, G.L.R.O. REC. NO. 2029), SITUATED IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF MAKATI, PROVINCE OF RIZAL. BOUNDED ON THE NE. BY STREET LOT OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN; ON THE SE. BY LOT NO. 12, SUB-BLOCK NO. 11, OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN; ON THE SW. BY LOT NO. 13, SUB-BLOCK NO. 11, OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN; AND ON THE NW. BY LOT NO. 10, SUB-BLOCK NO. 11, OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN. BEGINNING AT A POINT MARKED “1” ON PLAN, BEING S. 42 DEG. 49’ W., 3409.67 M. MORE OR LESS, FROM BLLM NO. 1, MP. OF MAKATI, THENCE S. 80 DEG. 50’ W., 25.50 M. TO POINT “2”; THENCE N. 9 DEG. 10’ W., 11.40 M . TO POINT “3”; THENCE N.80 DEG. 50’ E., 25.50 M. TO POINT “4”; THENCE S. 9 DEG. 10’ E., 11.40 M. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING AN AREA OF TWO HUNDRED NINETY ONE SQUARE METERS (291), MORE OR LESS. ALL POINTS REFERRED TO ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN; AND ON THE GROUND ARE MARKED BY P.L.S. CYLINDRICAL CONCRETE MONUMENTS; BEARING TRUE; DECLINATION 0 DEG. 37’ E., DATE OF THE ORIGINAL SURVEY, DEC. 10, 1923 TO JAN. 9,1924 AND THAT OF THE SUBDIVISION SURVEY, JAN. 16 TO MAR.30, 1940.”
Transfer Certificate of Title No. 006-2020000166
“A PARCEL OF LAND (LOT NO. 12, SUB-BLOCK
NO. 11, OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN PSD-17574, BEING A PORTION OF BLOCK NO. 13 DESCRIBED ON PLAN, PSD-17083, G.L.R.O. REC. NO. 2029), SITUATED IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF MAKKATI, PROVINCE OF RIZAL. BOUNDED ON THE NE. BY STREER LOT, OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN; ON THE SE. BY STREET LOT, OF THE SUBDIVISIONPLAN; ON THE SW. BY LOT NO. 13, SUB-BLOCK NO. 11, OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN; AND ON THE NW. BT LOT NO. 11, SUB- BLOCK NO. 11, OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAN. BEGINNING AT A POINT MARKED “1” ON PLAN, BEING S. 42 DEG. 49’ W., 3409.67 M. MORE OR LESS, FROM B.L.L.M. NO. 1, MP. OF MAKATI, THENCE S. 9 DEG. 10’ E., 8.57 M TO POINT “2”; THENCE; S. 35 DEG. 50’ w., 4.00 M. TO POINT “3”; THENCE S. 80 DEG. 50’ W., 22.67 TO POINT “4”; THENCE N. 9 DEG. 10’ W., 11.40 M. TO POINT “5”; THENCE N. 80 DEG. 50’ E., 25.50 M. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING AN AREA OF TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN SQUARE METERS (287) MORE OR LESS. ALL POINTS REFERRED TO ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN; AND ON THE GROUND ARE MARKED BY P.L.S. CYLINDRICAL CONCRETE MONUMENTS, BEARING TRUE; DECLANATION 0 DEG. 37’ E., DATE OF THE ORIGINAL SURVEY, DEC. 10, 1923 TO MAR. 9, 1924 AND THAT OF THE SUBDIVISION SURVEY, JAN 16 TO MAR. 30 1940.”
5. The subject properties were acquired by petitioners from Roland
Bravo SR. through Judicial Partition as decided by the Supreme Court in the case of Lily Elizabeth Bravo-Guerrero et al., V. Edward P. Bravo.1
6. A photocopy of the above-mentioned decision is hereto
attached as ANNEX “C” and is made an integral part hereof;
7. That annotated on said Transfer Certificate of Titles Nos. 006-
2020000165 and 006-2020000166 are the following entries to wit:
A. “ENTRY NO. 11172 (10242)/T-59000 – NOTICE OF
ADVERSE CLAIM FILED BY DAVID BRAVO DIAZ CLAIMING OWNERSHIP OVER THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS TITLE WHICH THE REGISTERED OWNER HAVE SOLD TO THE ABOVE NAME VENDEE (DOC NO. 499, PAGE NO. 101, BOOK NO. XXVI, S. OF 1995 OF THE NOT. PUBLIC FRANCISCO MALAYA. DATE OF INSTRUMENT – 1-10-1995 DATE OF INSCRIPTION – 1-17-1995 (SGD) NILDA P. BONGAT DEP.REG. OF DEEDS COPIED FROM TCT NO. 59000”
B. “ENTRY NO. 9003/T-58999 – RESOLUTION – BY
VIRTUE OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE FIRST DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT, MANILA, THE URGENT MOTION OF ATTY. ISABELO A. CENDANA JR., COUNSEL FOR INTERVENOR DAVID DIAZ, JR., TO ANNOTATE ATTORNEY’S LIEN PER AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 9, 1999 AT THE BACK OF THE TITLE UNDER LITIGATION PURSUANT TO SEC. 37, RULE 138 OF THE RULES OF COURT IS HEREBY GRANTED. DATE OF INSTRUMENT – NOV. 10, 2004 1 Lily Elizabeth Bravo-Guerrero, et al., V. Edward P. Bravo, G.R. No. 152658, July 29, 2005 DATE OF INSCRIPTION – JAN. 6, 2005 ATTY. DOROYLENE SB. YARA DEPUTY REGISTER OF DEEDS COPIED FROM TCT NO. 59000”
8. The annotation of adverse claims and attorney’s lien on the title
is unnecessary encumbrance which is derogatory to the title and ownership of the petitioners;
DISUSSION
9. In the case of Lily Elizabeth Bravo- Guerrero, et al V. Edward P.
Bravo, the court specifically decided in its dispositive portion that:
“WHEREFORE, we REVERSE the Decision of 21
December 2001 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 67794. We REINSTATE the Decision of 11 May 2000 of the Regional Trial Court of Makati, Branch No. 139, in Civil Case No. 97-137, declaring VALID the Deed of Sale with Assumption of Mortgage dated 28 October 1970, with the following MODIFICATIONS:
1. We GRANT judicial partition of the subject
Properties in the following manner:
a. Petitioner LILY ELIZABETH BRAVO-
GUERRERO is entitled to one-third (1/3) of the Properties;
b. Petitioner OFELIA BRAVO-QUIESTAS is
entitled to one-third (1/3) of the Properties;
c. The remaining one-third (1/3) portion of the
Properties should be divided equally between the children of ROLAND BRAVO. 2. The other heirs of ROLAND BRAVO must reimburse ROLAND BRAVO, JR. for whatever expenses the latter incurred in paying for and securing the release of the mortgage on the Properties.
SO ORDERED.”2
10.In the instant petition, it is evident, as decided by the
Supreme Court, that David Bravo Diaz and his predecessors in interest are not entitled to one-half (1/2) interest over the subject properties since the former is not a child of Roland Bravo;
11.Moreover, there is nothing mentioned in the said
decision that confers ownership over the subject properties to David Diaz and his predecessors in interest;
12.The petitioners the true and real owners of the subject
properties as clearly conferred by the court; As such it is imperative that the adverse claims and attorney’s lien be cancelled;
13.Hence, this petition.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most
respectfully prayed an order be entered directing the Registry of Deeds of Makati City to cancel Entry No. 11172 and 9003/T- 58999 as annotated on Transfer Certificate of Title Nos. 006- 2020000165 and 006-2020000166.
Other measures of relief, which are just and equitable
under the premises, are likewise prayed for. 2 Id Respectfully submitted.
Pasig City for Makati City ___ March 2020.
LALO LAW FIRM
8th Floor Revolving Tower, Market Avenue, Brgy. San Nicolas Pasig City, Metro Manila Philippines Tel. No. 637-3212
By:
REYNALDO ROSS D. SUCGANG IV
8th Floor, Pasig Revolving Tower Market Avenue, Brgy. San Nicolas, Pasig City Attorney’s Roll No. 68131 PTR No. 79991101; 1/4/2019, Metro Manila IBP OR No. 058450, 1/30/2019 – Aklan Chapter MCLE Compliance No. VI – 0006999, valid until 4/14/2022
Copy furnished:
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL
134 Amorsolo St., Legaspi Village, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines