Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CASSAVA PEELER
JULY 2020
i
APPROVAL SHEET
_________________ _________________
Date Signed Date Signed
RYAN M. ABENOJA
Adviser
________________
Date Signed
JOIE D. CATAYTAY
Program Head, BSABE
_________________
Date Signed
ROGER C. MONTEPIO
Dean, CARS
_________________
Date Signed
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, praises and thanks to the Lord Jesus Christ, for His showers
of blessings throughout the researcher work to complete the research successfully. The
researcher would like to express her deepest and sincere gratitude to many worthy
persons, without whom she could have never had the opportunity of learning greatly with
interest.
To Canoy family especially Kuya Jonathan, for the fabrication of her machine and
allowing her to use the apparatuses, equipment, and materials needed for the experimental
research.
To her thesis adviser Engr. Ryan Abenoja, who gives her the opportunity to do
research and providing invaluable guidance during the revision of the paper.
To her thesis panels Engr. Ruben Cantones and Engr.Ruel Tuyogon, for their
genuine support and their willingness to be in the committee and for giving suggestions in
improving this manuscript.
To her best of friends and relatives Abas, Llewelyn, Shaira, Joshua, Jethro, Mark,
Carlo, Ate Nancy, and Angkol Papat whose contributions significantly affect the success of
the study.
Most of all to her parents Mayok and Tata and her brother Kenneth and her sisters
Mariz and Maricel whom she is greatly indebted for she brought up with undying love,
support, encouragement and strengthened her even through her most difficult times
throughout the years.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
TITLE PAGE i
APPROVAL SHEET ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF TABLES vi
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF APPENDIX TABLES viii
LIST OF APPENDIX FIGURES ix
ABSTRACT x
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study 1
Objectives of the study 2
iv
Working principle of Modified Motorized Cassava Peeler 20
Procedural Framework 21
Conceptual Framework 21
Design Criteria and Construction of the Machine 22
Description of Machine Parts 22
Fabrication and Assembly of the Individual Parts 24
Operation of the Portable Cassava Peeler 26
Design Analysis 26
Experimental Design and Layout 28
Statistical design 29
Performance Evaluation 29
Cost and return analysis 30
LITERATURE CITED 47
APPENDICES
Appendix Tables 52
Appendix Figures 56
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table PAGE
2 Projected per capita supply and consumption of root and tuber crops 14
in the Philippines
14 Basic Assumptions 41
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure PAGE
4 Procedural Framework 21
9 Machine Prototype 32
vii
LIST OF APPENDIX TABLES
Appendix Table
PAGE
viii
LIST OF APPENDIX FIGURES
Appendix Figure
PAGE
ix
ABSTRACT
Cassava peeling has become the major problem of cassava processing worldwide. This is
attributed to the irregularity in shape, size and thickness across different varieties of cassava
tubers. It is a perishable root crop and easily deteriorates. Thus, the processing of cassava
after harvest is necessary to extend the shelf life of root tubers. This study is therefore on
the modification, fabrication, and evaluates the performance of cassava peeler of effective
labor less motorized machine which aims to compare the peeling performance of peeling
blade type 1 and type 2 cassava peeling with rolled strips and flat strips blades respectively.
The machine was evaluated using completely randomized design and a factorial design at
three (3) different speeds; (80rev/min, 90rev/min, 100rev/min), with ¾ Hp electric motor and
tested with a minimum of three trials with 0.5kg cassava tubers feed per loading. The results
were evaluated, for peeling blade type 1 gave the highest mean peeling efficiency and
peeling capacity of 71.56% and 53.57kg/hr in peeling curve shapes and 66.8% and 71.5
kg/hr in peeling linear shapes respectively. In peeling blade type 2, the highest mean
peeling efficiency and peeling capacity for peeling curve shapes are 84.89% and 57.17kg/hr
and 95.56% and 168.5 kg/hr in peeling linear shapes respectively. The results of the
performance evaluated for peeling blade type 2 was generally better than peeling blade type
1.
x
xi