https://off-guardian.

org/2021/04/29/deleting-the-reset-the-
imminent-struggle-ahead/#comment-365450

I am not identified in in the frame of an oppositional will, but

of uncovering a true will - an unconflicted recognition that
aligns thought, word and deed.

I am not saying I have no habits and temptations to be

phished by reaction such as to see in terms of who I then think
I am - or am set against. So I recognise that to those who are
set in opposition as the only salvation, I must appear to be a
'controlled or captured opposition' for 'who is not with us, is
against us' as Bush senior liked to say. But I am with you, as a
freedom to think and give or share and express or act, even if
I may not support your current choices.

You may think you are free to think, but are you free to
question all thought? And from what basis CAN we evaluate
our our mind?

Fear has made us stranger to ourself, such that what we are in

truth becomes alien to a sense of self set in opposition,
distance, lockdown and masking narratives taken as salvation
- and thus protected from real question, for the narrative rules
and filters as the operating system of what can be run as
thought. In this sense fear is the psyop of a fake substitution
of Reality by and interjection that once we open a place from
which to evaluate it truly, will reveal itself increasingly insane
or obviously contrived to cover over and deny BY codified
displacement mapping. There is no way to speak directly to
those who are actively denying their own Right mind as the
conviction they are as their thought, fear and world dictate.

But there is a way to extend and invite relationship as a

potential for willingness to share something true - such as
acknowledgement of existence as a being of choice or freedom
to choose - at the level of thought, for all chosen actions are
expressions - or suppression of expression of a perception or
appreciation that involved selective interpretations.

This can be likened to working within the mad dream towards

waking up from its central premise, without destroying the
consciousness of the current set of choices. In this sense truth
heals and undoes untruth rather than opposing illusions as if
they ARE true, but only as you willingly accept and desire.

Because your questions and assertions are all 'in the world'
and in particular set in the judgement of PERSONS, they frame
'answer' in the terms you set.

Mikovitch dedicated her life to fighting cancer (then believed to

have viral cause) as a result of tragic loss. We can be set in
fundamental ways by trauma. Belief that we are on track to
defeat terrible evils that others can then be saved from having
to live such overwhelming and hateful experience - will
subjugate all else to serve purpose, but when she found out
about contaminated vaccines, she was unwilling to join in
hiding it. She is also very stubborn and doesn't like being told
what to do. So she broke from a message or narrative that
revealed just how loveless it was and has suffered as a result,
but retains grievance that seeks to regain what she feels
denied and deprived of. This is also a blind spot in which all
else can be subordinated to attaining justice. If you saw here
with Andrew Kaufman, you may see she is deeply invested in
the pathogenic viral model even though unable to meet his
simple questions in a like response. However, I don't feel to
push malign intent on her even though she undermines her
own credibility as a a witness in regard to her own unresolved
conflicts, which are replaying through the very technology she
was trained to develop as an opposition to such outcomes.

The danger of training in any field of specialise focus, is of

becoming tooled to see only through the model of one's
training or indeed indoctrination.

I am aligned in terrain or Living Field theory and experience

myself as an expression of the Field, rather than as an
asymptomatic psychopath, waiting to be triggered. Yet I see a
psycho-pathy of dissociation or split mind that is much easier
to judge in others than recognise in act, as part of my OWN
self-protective recoil from learned or conditioned threat. For
the mind is divinely expert or ingenious as a means for
masking over what I am predicated to deny - or unready/
unwilling to accept.

Our world - as a masking narrative overlay given currency - is

a complex mass of projected, cast out and denied conflict
evasion for the sake of protecting a self-separate or private
sense of covert ID, as the basis of a dream-turned nightmare.
Be careful what you wish for. Or rather be consciously aware of
the mind's capacity to wish instead of will, such as to then
deny a living will for a mind set in wishing - given power and
protection in our name. IE: I WANT IT THUS!!!

Reading what runs beneath is not a means to gain power over

anyone else, but a restoration or renewal of awareness at the
heart. But I can let you be part of my willingness to wake from
a futile and mad world by releasing you of what I thought or
judged you to be. Now I know you not, but am free to learn of
you anew. This meaning of forgiveness has nothing to do with
WHAT you seem to do or represent in my own judgement. It is
not IN the world where you are responsible for your own
choices because you are free to learn from them.

It has everything to do with a true escape from fear - if only at

first as a partial willingness to consider for an instant taken
from fear's dictate.

I am not Reiner Fuellmich's judge. But if I needed legal

support I would trust his integrity to do the best he can with
what he has. Yes there are built in deceits as regards legal and
lawful, but in practical terms, releasing the entanglement with
all the other crabs in a crab barrel is aligning in a workability
for what serves purpose now. For the nature of the divide and
rule is division and conflict by which to lockstep in ruling OUT,
even while valiantly hitting tweedledum with your 'truther
rattle'.

Aligning against unreality as if to get it to change is to become

unreal.

This is a variation on the theme of getting rid of the ego. This

is the most prized agenda of the ego. Put it behind you is
letting the passed be past, so as to align in what truly moves
you and BE your life, instead of reiterating the hateful or
hurtful in the rage that seeks to stamp it out for messing with
My Plan as to what everything should be.

If you or anyone is interested, I put this post, but ALSO an

inspirational synchronicity for this morning on my blog-dump
(for I confess it is a repository of the attempt to sketch a
bridge of reintegrative willingness in whatever the world brings
to awareness). This is reflecting in the themes you bring, at a
level that is free to look at them.

I recognise others in their dedication and alignment of

purpose, as well as where their personality gets in the way or
even parodies a caricature of the one who lives but know not
who they are. We have each our own strengths and liabilities
and often take one to be the other. Relationships are the
crucible of transformation. Distancing and masking in
protected circles become unreal, or out of sync with Reality.
Fear DOES what it defends.

Your judgements cut both ways. We all have experienced the

itch to seek support and validation for our story, but the more
we scratch it, the worse it gets. Too much inflammation! If you
are shown the false is false, why do you not abandon or
release it to let in the true? Is waking everyone ELSE up a
form of captured or controlled opposition?

I am not having a go at you here, but joining in a freedom to

think - or align in thoughts that reflect a resonance with
something wholly worthy to share in.

I am at home. Fear is the stranger here.

Fear is a stranger to the ways of love.
Identify with fear, and you will be a stranger to yourself.
And thus you are unknown to you.
What is your Self remains an alien to the part of you which
thinks that it is real, but dif- ferent from yourself.
Who could be sane in such a circumstance?
Who but a madman could believe he is what he is not, and
judge against himself? There is a stranger in our midst, who
comes from an idea so foreign to the truth he speaks a
different language, looks upon a world truth does not know,
and understands what truth regards as senseless.
Stranger yet, he does not recognize to whom he comes, and
yet maintains his home belongs to him, while he is alien now
who is at home.
And yet, how easy it would be to say, "This is my home.
Here I belong, and will not leave because a madman says I
must."
What reason is there for not saying this?
What could the reason be except that you had asked this
stranger in to take your place, and let you be a stranger to
yourself?
No one would let himself be dispossessed so needlessly, unless
he thought there were another home more suited to his tastes.
Who is the stranger?
Is it fear or you who are unsuited to the home which God
provided for His Son?
Is fear His Own, created in His likeness?
Is it fear that love completes, and is completed by?
There is no home can shelter love and fear.
They cannot coexist.
If you are real, then fear must be illusion.
And if fear is real, then you do not exist at all.
How simply, then, the question is resolved.
Who fears has but denied himself and said, "I am the stranger
here.