Professional Documents
Culture Documents
About UNWTO:
What is it?
The World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) is the United Nations agency responsible for the promotion of
responsible, sustainable and universally accessible tourism.
Members:
UNWTO’s membership includes 158 countries, 6 Associate Members and over 500 Affiliate Members
representing the private sector, educational institutions, tourism associations and local tourism authorities.
What it does?
As the leading international organization in the field of tourism, UNWTO promotes tourism as a driver
of economic growth, inclusive development and environmental sustainability and offers leadership and
support to the sector in advancing knowledge and tourism policies worldwide.
UNWTO encourages the implementation of the Global Code of Ethics for Tourism, to maximize
tourism’s socio-economic contribution while minimizing its possible negative impacts, and is committed to
promoting tourism as an instrument in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), geared
towards reducing poverty and fostering sustainable development worldwide.
UNWTO generates market knowledge, promotes competitive and sustainable tourism policies and
instruments, fosters tourism education and training, and works to make tourism an effective tool for
development through technical assistance projects in over 100 countries around the world.
A recent study found that our atmosphere is a better shield from meteoroids than previously thought. So far,
researchers knew that meteoroids often blew up before they reach the Earth’s surface, but they did not know
why.
In a decision intended to end the inordinate delay in the prosecution of politicians in criminal cases, the Centre
has decided to set up special courts to deal exclusively with cases against 1,581 MPs and MLAs with the aim of
disposing of them in a year. this decision has been conveyed by the centre to the Supreme Court.
What has the Centre proposed?
Initially, 12 courts would be constituted. Two special courts would handle cases against 228 MPs and the other
10 would be set up in 10 states — Andhra, Bihar, Karnataka, Kerala, MP, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu,
Telangana, UP and Bengal—where the number of MLAs booked for criminal acts is more than 65. Disposing
of 1,581criminal cases involving political persons within a time frame of one year as directed by the SC is the
aim as well as the objective of the scheme.
Need for special courts:
There are several high-profile cases against leaders from almost all political parties—regional and national
where investigations have dragged on for years and those facing trial have evaded prison.
Implications of this move:
The Centre’s decision could be a setback to politicians who, despite facing serious charges, have remained
members of Parliament and state assemblies due to time consumed in trials. Such cases will fall in the purview
of special courts and their fate will be decided expeditiously.
Special courts to try politicians, Centre informs SC
In news:
Special courts to try exclusively criminal cases involving MPs and MLAs: The Centre informed the
Supreme Court that it will set up at least 12 special courts.
Supreme Court to directly interact with the State governments on issues like the appointment of judicial
officers, public prosecutors, court staff and other requirements of manpower and infrastructure for the
special courts.
Background:
The court on November 1 directed the Centre to place before it details of 1,581 cases involving MPs and
MLAs, as declared by the politicians at the time of filing their nominations during the 2014 general
elections.
The affidavit was in response to a Supreme Court direction in November to the government to frame a
Central scheme for setting up special courts across the country exclusively to try criminal cases involving
“political persons”.
Supreme Court’s observation:
It could take years, probably decades, to complete the trial against a politician.
By this time, he or she would have served as a Minister or legislator several times over.
FAME India scheme
Original equipment manufacturers will have to seek approval from the Department of Heavy Industry before
accepting any proposal to supply electric buses for availing incentives under the FAME India scheme. The
move is aimed at facilitating the smooth roll out and management of demand incentives for electric buses under
the scheme.
India and Australia highlighted the need to maintain the Asia-Pacific region as a “free” and “open” zone under
recently held the “2+2” dialogue model which includes the foreign and defense secretaries of both sides. The
discussion was the first meeting of this level since the two sides participated in the quadrilateral discussion for a
new strategic partnership targeting the Asia-Pacific region.
Need to maintain the Asia- Pacific region as a free and open zone:
A free, open, prosperous and inclusive Indo-Pacific region serves the long-term interests of all countries in the
region and of the world at large. Besides, there is a growing convergence of strategic perspectives between the
India and Australia.
Way ahead:
Asia’s third largest economy, India – remains on the outside of the APEC grouping despite a membership
request dating back more than 20 years. India in APEC would help offset the now-overwhelming influence of
the Chinese economy, while also embedding India in a forum that would nudge it toward further economic
reform.
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
India will host the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors of AIIB at Mumbai on 25th and 26th June
2018. In this regard, the Government of India and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) Secretariat have
signed the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to delineate the duties and responsibilities of major
stakeholders who would be involved in organizing the aforesaid Annual Meeting.
The Theme of the Annual Meeting, 2018 will be “Mobilizing Finance for Infrastructure: Innovation and
Collaboration”.
About AIIB:
What is it?
The AIIB was established as a new multilateral financial institution aimed at providing “financial support for
infrastructure development and regional connectivity in Asia.” It was founded in October, 2014, and has its
headquarters in Beijing.
Its goals are also to boost economic development in the region, create wealth, prove infrastructure, and promote
regional cooperation and partnership.
Funding: The value of AIIB’s authorized capital amounts to $100 billion, with almost $30 billion invested by
China. India is not only one of the founding members of AIIB but is also the 2nd largest shareholder in AIIB.
New bridges inaugurated in eastern Arunachal Pradesh
Context: Two crucial bridges in eastern Arunachal Pradesh have been dedicated to the nation. The bridges have
been built by the Border Roads Organisation (BRO).
Injupani Bridge: It is a 140-metre long-bridge on Roing-Koronu-Paya road, which is a part of Trans Arunachal
Highway. The completion of the Injupani Bridge will provide an uninterrupted access between Roing & Tezu,
both important district HQs in Arunachal Pradesh.
Deopani/Eze Bridge: It is 300-metre long pre-stressed concrete balanced cantilever bridge over the Eze river at
Roing in Arunachal Pradesh. The completion of the Eze bridge has come as a boon for the people of the area,
especially those of Dibang Valley district, as the district remained cut off from the rest of the country during the
monsoons each year.
About BRO:
Functioning under the control of the Ministry of Defence since 2015, the BRO is engaged in road construction
to provide connectivity to difficult and inaccessible regions in the border areas of the country.
It is staffed by officers and troops drawn from the Indian Army’s Corps of Engineers, Electrical and
Mechanical Engineers, Army Service Corps, Military Police and army personnel on extra regimental
employment.
Engineering Service and personnel from the General Reserve Engineer Force (GREF) form the parent
cadre of the Border Roads Organisation.
Currently, the organisation maintains operations in twenty-one states, one UT (Andaman and Nicobar
Islands), and neighbouring countries such as Afghanistan, Bhutan, Myanmar, and Sri Lanka.
The BRO operates and maintains over 32,885 kilometres of roads and about 12,200 meters of
permanent bridges in the country.
IMT highway
India is planning to hold talks with Asean countries to extend the India-Myanmar-Thailand highway up
to Vietnam. As per proposals from India, the highway could be extended to Vietnam via Laos and
Cambodia.
Significance of this expansion:
This connectivity can generate an estimated $70 billion annually in incremental GDP and $20 million in
incremental aggregate employment by 2025. Connecting India with the South eastern countries through a
network of road will create jobs, market for crops grown in hilly regions of the Northeast which will also help
growers in getting better price for their produce.
About IMT highway:
The India–Myanmar–Thailand Trilateral Highway is a highway under construction under India’s Look East
policy that will connect Moreh, India with Mae Sot, Thailand via Myanmar. The road is expected to boost trade
and commerce in the ASEAN–India Free Trade Area, as well as with the rest of Southeast Asia. It is important
to note that the project already missed its first deadline in 2015 and India has consistently faced difficulty in
implementing its projects in Myanmar.
Background:
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), has 10 member nations Indonesia, Malaysia, The
Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Brunei Darussalam, Vietnam, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Cambodia.
RTI and its application to Higher Judiciary
The Delhi high court has recently held that the Right To Information (RTI) Act would not override the
Supreme Court Rules (SCR) when it comes to dissemination of information.
The RTI Act cannot be resorted to in case the information sought for is related to judicial function,
which can be challenged by way of any legal proceeding.
The SCR would be applicable with regard to the judicial functioning of the Supreme Court. Whereas for
administrative functioning of the Supreme Court, RTI Act would be applicable and information could be
provided under it.
The dissemination of information under the SCR is part of judicial function, exercise of which cannot be
taken away by any statute. It is settled legal position that the legislature is not competent to take away the
judicial powers of the court by statutory prohibition.
The court’s order came on a plea by the Supreme Court of India, through its Registrar, who had
challenged an May 2011 order of the Central Information Commission (CIC) directing the apex court to
answer the queries of litigant R.S. Misra as to why his SLP was dismissed.
No litigant can be allowed to seek information through an RTI application or a letter on the
administrative side as to why and for what reasons the judge had come to a particular decision or
conclusion.
A judge is not bound to explain later on for what reasons he had come to such a conclusion.
At issue is the right of citizens to get information from the Supreme Court , and by implication, India’s
higher judiciary, which has strongly resisted the RTI.
The apex court summarily rejects RTI requests, and insists that applicants exclusively request
information under its administrative rules (Supreme Court Rules) framed in 1966, and re-issued with minor
changes in 2014.
However the Supreme Court Rules undermined the RTI in four key ways.
Unlike the RTI Act, the Rules do not provide for: a time frame for furnishing information; an appeal
mechanism, and penalties for delays or wrongful refusal of information.
The nub of the matter is that the Supreme Court Registry wants to provide information at its absolute
discretion.
Its brazen disregard for the RTI has now got a stamp of approval from a court of record.
The RTI has suffered another blow, not from the berated political class or the much maligned babus, but
from the “gems of institutions” enjoined to protect the law.
2. Human Rights in India: Role of Government
December 10 is the anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the
UN General Assembly.
As an early supporter of the UN movement and a constant participant in its deliberations, India has, in
international fora, constantly endorsed the charter of rights that the declaration unfurled.
Constitution and Role of government
The constitutional provisions are inadequate by themselves and the role of government is fundamental
in advancing them.
In fact, it is precisely because we cannot rely on civilisational values that may or may not be enshrined
in the constitution to deliver us rights that we adopt democracy as the form of government.
Historically, votaries of civilisational values have struggled to break free of cultural prejudices and
accord similar status to other civilisations.
Not very long ago, colonialism had been justified on civilisational terms, with the very term “civilised”
being used to differentiate the West from the indigenous populations of the lands colonised by Europe.
Civilisational hubris abounds in claims of “the inclusivity of Hinduism” or “the egalitarianism of
Islam”.
Whatever be the exhortations in the texts that underlie these religions, the history of caste and gender
inequality in India and Islamic societies, respectively, show them to have been neither inclusive nor
egalitarian.
It is clear that civilisational values, in our case Indian, are far from sufficient to deliver us the rights that
we seek to make our own.
Though the UN’s declaration of human rights is expansive, Indian civilization has not had much success
in ensuring their delivery.
If any progress has at all been made in the desired direction, it has been after the adoption of a
democratic form of governance.
In terms of human development, 21st century India is radically different from what it was in the 20th
century.
That economic inequality has steadily risen and ecological stress is written all over the country cannot
take away from the fact that there has been progress of a form that has collapsed social distance.
There is social churning in India, with some of it having come through affirmative action and some of it
through economic transformation in which the more recent liberalisation of the economy has had some role.
However, as India has managed to shed some of the centuries old practices that maintained social
distance due to caste and economic differentiation, newer axes of power have emerged.
We have begun to see an unimaginable rise of violence against women and Muslims. Hardening
patriarchy and Hindu chauvinism are India’s unanticipated demons.
The efficacy of constitutional provisions is entirely dependent on the government machinery entrusted
to our elected representatives.
An effective protection of individuals, in this case women and minorities, from acts of violence requires
the power of the state to weigh in on their side.
In too many cases of violence against women, Muslims and Dalits, the Indian state is distinguished by
its absence.
We want to ensure the flourishing of all the peoples of India not out of self-preservation but because we
want to be civilised and it reflects the true spirit of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam.
1. PPP in Infrastructure
The Prime Minister inaugurated a 30 km section of the 72-kilometre-long Hyderabad Metro Rail Project on
November 28.
Hyderabad Metro is primarily financed through private investment, unlike other metro projects that are entirely
funded by the public exchequer.
It is also the largest PPP (public-private partnership) investment in India, and one of the largest in the world.
The total investment could well be about Rs. 20,000 crore. Other than a viability gap grant of Rs. 1,458 crore
from the Central government, the rest will be private investment.
State government is only required to provide the land for three maintenance depots where real estate development
can be undertaken above the ground floor.
Role of Concession Agreement
In particular, the fare structure laid down in the Concession Agreement will always remain affordable on account
of greater efficiencies as well as the cross-subsidization from real estate development.
The accountability framework laid down in the Concession Agreement is clear and precise as it can identify and
address any defaults or malfeasance.
The other PPP project in question is the Airport Metro Line project of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC),
which was terminated by the concessionaire, Reliance Infrastructure, with an arbitration award of about Rs. 5,000
crore [interest included] against the former, primarily on account of a flawed concession agreement that enabled
inflated costs and claims.
Notably, the arbitration panel comprising three engineers, empanelled by DMRC itself, held that the construction
works suffered from serious defects, including over 1,500 cracks in concrete structures.
Separately, the Commissioner for Railway Safety reduced the stipulated train speed due to safety concerns.
The project is now being run by DMRC consequent upon the demise of PPP. In sum, public interest has been
ripped apart by means of a huge termination payment as well as large recurring losses in the years ahead.
The Hyderabad Metro is entirely based on the model concession agreement (MCA) of the erstwhile Planning
Commission whereas DMRC’s Metro Line is based on a distorted version of the same MCA.
Their comparison will clearly reveal how critical the underlying contractual framework is. This is akin to the
software which determines the success of a satellite.
This tale reflects two extremes in the same sector, during the same period and in the same country.
The lessons learnt would be invaluable for accelerating the much-needed infrastructure investment in India.