Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by K EL LY D OBO S
As a cosmetic chemist you will undoubtedly be asked to make products that require you to
combine materials that aren’t easily compatible. Fortunately, there is a system that can help you
get started.
Cosmetic Emulsions
Emulsions are one of the most common forms of cosmetic products. You find them in skin
lotions, make-up, and even hair products. By definition an emulsion is a dispersion of two or
more immiscible materials, where one phase, also know as the internal phase, is dispersed in the
continuous or external phase. Cosmetic emulsions are classified as oil in water (O/W), water in oil
(W/O) and water in silicone (W/Si). Multiple emulsions such as oil in water in oil (W/O/W) are
also possible. Oil in water emulsions are the most common due to preferable cost and light skin
feel.
In order to create an oil in water emulsion (one that remains stable for a long enough time), work
must be done to overcome the interfacial tension between the two phases. This can be achieved by
mixing; however mixing even at very high rates is not enough to provide long term stability. An
emulsifier or combination of emulsifiers is needed to stabilize droplets of the dispersed phase.
For example, simple oil in vinegar salad dressings will separate rapidly without the use of an
emulsifier like mustard.
Using Surfactants
In this industry, we use surfactants to create emulsions. Surfactants are molecules that have a
hydrophobic (oil soluble) and an effective hydrophilic (water soluble) portion. They act as
emulsifiers by significantly lowering the interfacial tension and decreasing the coalescence of
dispersed droplets.
HLB Formulating
Figuring out what surfactant to use for any specific formula will be a challenge you face as a
cosmetic chemist. There is a great deal of research on surfactants and their behavior. But studying
the thermodynamic equations and phase diagrams associated with surfactants can be a daunting
task, not to mention the number of surfactants available to the formulator is vast. Luckily for us,
William C. Griffin developed a way to streamline the selection of surfactants by utilizing the ratio
of the hydrophobic to the hydrophilic portion of the molecule. This method is referred to as the
HLB (Hydrophile Lipophile Balance) method. Griffin first presented this method at meeting of
the Chicago Chapter of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists in 1949 and it is still widely used today.
He published the method shortly there after.1 (A bit of trivia for you, the Chicago Chapter was the
first chapter formed in Society of Cosmetic Chemists)
The HLB method applies to nonionic (uncharged) surfactants but attempts have been made to
broaden the concepts to other surfactant types including silicone surfactants. And using the HLB
system to create emulsions is quite simple. All you have to do is calculate the HLB number of your
surfactant, then the Required HLB for the oil phase and match the two numbers.
Based on the calculation, surfactants with high HLB values will be more water soluble and those
with low HLB values are more oil soluble. Division by 5 just allows for a compact, easy to use
scale. The calculation is simple, but you won’t usually have to figure it out since most surfactant
HLB values are readily available through literature references and surfactant suppliers.
You can now select emulsifiers to match the required HLB of the oil phase and create an
emulsion. A blend of high and low HLB surfactants is often used to achieve the desired value in
part because of demonstrated effectiveness and efficiencies in packing at the interface. The HLB
for the surfactant blend is calculated in same manner as the required HLB for a blend.
Total HLB:
Limitations of HLB
Although a very useful tool, the HLB system does have some limitations. For example additional
water phase ingredients are not considered but still may impact the stability. The method also
does not provide information as to how much surfactant is needed, but 2 to 4% surfactant is a
good starting point to begin further optimization for stability. So it is important to keep in mind
that the HLB system is not absolute in prediction of your formulations behavior, but a very good
starting point for achieving emulsification.
References
1. Griffin WC; Calculation of HLB Values of Non-Ionic Surfactants, Journal of the Society of
Cosmetic Chemists; 1954. Vol. 5, pp 249-235
2. Vaughan, C.D. Rice, Dennis A.; Predicting O/W Emulsion Stability by the “Required HLB
Equation”; Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology; 1990. Vol. 11 (1), pp 83 – 91.
Please email me how I can make silicon emulsion being used to make polish car
dashboard
The name silicone oil, viscosity and emulsifiers that can be used with the method of
making me an email.
best regard
biglar
REPLY
http://chemistscorner.com/cosmeticsciencetalk
REPLY
Hi Helen,
If you use the HLB method, you must perform the calculations above for your oil phase.
REPLY
REPLY
is the calculation will be the same for multiple emulsion w/o/w. do i have to calculate for
primary w/o first and then for secondary o/w later to get the desired HLB for multiple
emulsion. or it has its own calculation?or i can just use surfactant with necessary value of
HLB for both as there are no mixture of surfactant in both primary and secondary
emulsion. thank you
REPLY
Kelly June 11, 2013 at 12:50 pm
Hi Maria,
Multiple emulsions can be a little more tricky. I don’t have much experience creating them
but here is the title of an article which you should find helpful.
Multiple W/O/W emulsions-Using the required HLB for emulsifier evaluation.
Authors – Schmidts, T., Dobler, D., Guldan, A.C., Paulus, N., Runkel, F.,
Journal – Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
REPLY
REPLY
Thanks,
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
Wesley November 27, 2012 at 12:03 pm
I have some questions to grit or small particulate that will go away upon a little rubbing in
the final product. Would this be a for of flake that is a fall out in the emulsion or is this a
solid particle film that could be forming in a formula?
I would like to make a sprayable sunflower oil emulsion. What emuslifier should I use and
in what proportion? Thanks
REPLY
You are correct, lower HLB surfactants (4-6) are W/O emulsifiers but other formulation
factors like the size of the oil phase can effect formula type. You can simply test what type
you have by trying to dilute the final product with water. A W/O does not dilute while a
O/W would/
REPLY
I find it so encouraging that I’m not the only human out there over the age of 20 who
doesn’t know any of this!
Time to learn *about all of it*.
REPLY
Hi there, i have aproblem in mixing jojoba oil & glycerin using Tween 80 at 8% & span 8o
at12 % the emulsion separate , did Iuse the right emulsifier or the % is wrong please
repply & many thanks
REPLY
REPLY
One of my experiments has shown that using 3% of sorbitan sesquioleate is less stable
than using 2% !!!!
Second, I want to ask about cooling phase, should it be done in very cold water bath and
done quickly or it is better to cool the cream slowly !!!
Please help me ?
Thanks in advance
George
REPLY
You would need to know the structure of your surfactant, and keep in mind, HLB applies
to ethoxylated nonionic surfactants. I’m not familiar with biosurfactant structures, so I
don’t know whether the HLB method applies.
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
phum February 28, 2012 at 6:49 am
Hello,George
How can I make an easiest way to make an emulsifier?
P.S.I want the answer fastest as you can.
Phum
REPLY
REPLY
1- 40 g vaseline
2- 40 g water
3- 8 g emulsifier ( i shose Span 60″sorbitan monostearate, HLB = 4.7 and tween 60, hlb =
14.9): 7 g span 60 + 1 g tween 60)
i heated to 70 for the oily phase and 73 for the water phase ..
REPLY
Hi George,
By the looks of it you are trying to create a w/o formulation. These are very tricky
formulations to produce with only ethoxylated emulsifiers. Typically, waxes are added to
the oil phase to help stbailize these types of emulsions and homogenization is a must. You
may want to adjust your oil phase by adding oils with higher required HLBs and try
making a o/w emulsion before attempting a w/o with this method.
REPLY
i know that it is better to put some waxes… but i felt that the cream is thick enough due to
the large amount of SPAN 60 WAX …
still i don’t want to do O/W cream.. inversely, i’m insisting on W/O creams… if u can help
me in this .. because till now none of my formulas was stable at 50 Centigrate for more
than 48 hours …( the oily phase begine to separate !!!! )
thanks a lot in advance kelly
REPLY
My own view is that making successful emulsions is more of an art than a science. My first
emulsion, looking back on it, was actually a butter: it contained 25% lipids, of which 15%
was shea. It had a salmon colour because of the green tea extract in it. I thought it was a
failure, but got demands to make more from test customers who really loved it. More
lately I’ve been more into using desert plant bioactives.
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
Would you please confirm am I on the right track with these calcs?
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
Just wonder how to interpret/decide which emulsion remains the most stable? I have set
the surfactant to be 3% (parenteral formulation).
Then, all the resulting emulsion seems to be the same. Separation of oil and water has
taken place. The oil will immediately float back to above after i shaken the emulsion
(although the oil did dispersed into the water when i shaked the emulsion at 1st).
However, i do see droplets of oil. They do not aggregate to form a bigger droplets. Should i
just proceed with other surfactant? Because the same situation has taken place for the 3rd
kind of surfactant’s mixture. Thanks for the advice. =)
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
shivraj October 6, 2010 at 12:40 am
What is the defferrence between glyceryl monosterate
and glyceryl monostearate self emulsifyig
REPLY
Dennis’ comments are a bit amusing in one sense of the word because slide rules were still
in use then. Yes, we recognized some of the faults of the system and these were outlined in
my thesis for a Master’s Degree in 1955 which, of course, was not published.
Cheers, and may you have as much fun as has been my good fortune in life – and without
scads of money.
REPLY
I know what I’m going to say here is provocative and sacrilegious, but this whole system
seems somewhat antiquated and akin to the slide rule. I think modern formulation
requires more flexibility and has available to it more effective tools. Using DOE and
polymeric emulsifiers we can create better products faster and discover more unexpected
combinations than using these HLB calculations, which don’t account for formula
aesthetics or product perception. Even using this system it’s still an iterative process to
achieve the look and feel of the product you want.
REPLY