WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT #2:

 Part 1:

A carbon footprint is the total aggregate of greenhouse gas emissions which

arise from the manufacturing, use and end-of-life of a product, or service to
transferring goods and material from warehouse to customer or any other place.
It comprises carbon dioxide, the gas most usually emitted by humans — and
others, containing nitrous oxide, methane and fluorinated gases, these usually
set-up heat in the atmosphere which causes global warming. Typically, the bulk
of an individual’s carbon footprint comes from transportation, food and housing.
Nowadays businesses have idea they are not just at work for the present, they
are financing for the future. As climate change and other ecological matters take
focused stage and influence all zones of our lives, accountable companies are
compelling initiative to reduce their carbon emission. Though any participation
from company actions can have a big environmental influence. Consumption is
the exclusive end and drive of all production, therefore pushing consumption
definitely in the field of manufacturing ecology. Carbon emissions produced by
household consumption, predictable to be held responsible for around 72 % of
carbon emissions on a global basis.

Walmart as a retailer with procedures is working in more than two dozen

countries and track down that extents the globe, According to company’s
authorities Walmart is highly dedicated to speak to climate change and focused
on consolidation commercial resilience, encouraging for climate action and
aiming for zero emissions across company’s global operations by the year 2040,
without depend on carbon offsets. Walmart was also the first retailer in 2016 with
a science-based objective intended to accomplish emissions reduction in their
own processes and supply chain, which they have been recently promoted to
bring into line with the highest determination of the Science-Based Target
inventiveness.

The goal concealments scope-one and two emissions, Walmart’s own operations
which are directly controlled by company and second emissions which shield its
unintended emissions from sources for example electricity and heating.Another
third emission is its supply chain, Bloomberg projected that these carbon
emissions are about 95% of company’s total carbon footprint.

For the reason that most emissions in the retail sector list up in product supply
chains somewhat than in distribution centers and stores, The Company is also
operational with suppliers from side to side over Project Gigaton designed and
taking the initiative to avoid a Gigaton of greenhouse gas emissions from the
global value chain by the year of 2030. Project Gigaton is designed for every
supplier which can take part in this, no matter which type of goods or products or
what are you providing to sell. That’s the corresponding of captivating over 200
 million customer vehicles off United States roads for a year.

Since the effort sprung in 2017 more than 2,300 suppliers have signed on.
Contractors report a total of 230 million metric tons of emissions evaded over
waste, energy, agriculture, packaging, forests and manufactured goods use and
design.

 In summary, manufacturing ecology, with its wide extending systems has a
great compact to contribute to the expedition to plan strategies to move in the
direction of less or decreased carbon, fulfilling lifestyles. So it is crucial for the
major retailers to invest in reducing carbon emission to save the atmosphere for
their better future.

PART2:

Though national leaders have been relaxed to take action on decreasing

greenhouse gas emissions which contribute to climate change, but Government
authority now plans can ensure that decreasing carbon emissions is a substance
of law and all within the major retailer must meet the terms. Some of the
purposes established out by the Government comprise decreasing the
production of greenhouse gases over and done with carbon budgets and carbon
limits, utilization of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and by carbon standards
to ensure that plans and policies assessments accountable for their impacts on
climate change.

Effective policy by government is required to attain deep, long-term declines in

U.S. and UK Greenhouse carbon emissions, and to help reinforce climate
flexibility through the economy. Even in the nonexistence of an inclusive federal
approach, the nationwide government can help by increase speed progress
being prepared by states, and large businesses’ companies. Governmental
policymakers have a amount of policy tools at their clearance:

 Government research and development agendas and programs, like as

the Advanced Research Project Agency-Energy is able to get-up-and-go progress in
uncontaminated energy technologies and take along them to marketable use.
 Natural Gas STAR which is volunteer program, do work with industries to
reduce emissions, every so often with public acknowledgement.
 Traditional regulations, like fuel efficiency and productions principles for
cars and trucks, necessitate companies to upsurge energy efficiency or decrease
emissions in their own operations or in the things or products they produced.
 To put a price on carbon emissions such as Market-based programs, for
example carbon tax or cap-and-trade program, necessitate emission declines but
occupancy the private sector regulate the most cost-effective method to attain them.
Though all such designed policies and programs can aid to decrease emissions and
determine technological change, economists through the political continuum reach a
decision that a flexible, market-based approach is the much better cost-effective
solution to decrease emissions, and must be a focus of a wide-ranging climate strategy.
The executive, legislative, and official branches all must have to play a role to in
decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and constructing strong communities.

To apply a carbon tax, the government have to define the peripheral cost for every ton
of greenhouse gas emission. It seems problematic for the reason that scientists and
economists should agree first on which rulebooks to use. To keep temperatures from
increasing above 1.5 C by 2030, the cost should be much higher, according to analysis
of a 2018, a New York Times United Nations recent report from the Association for
Economic Cooperation and Development bring into being that the average carbon price
was around $35 per ton across 42 major economies in 2018. The price degree of
difference shows that governments discover it politically problematic to charge sufficient
to decrease emissions significantly.

The tax can decreases emissions in two ways. First, increasing the cost of
carbon-based fuels will stimulate businesses to modification to clean energy.
These comprise wind energy, solar energy and hydro-powered sources. The
carbon tax imposed on companies will also upsurge the price of gasoline and
electricity. Customers will then turn out to be more energy-efficient, additional
plummeting greenhouse gas emissions.

On the governmental level, officials are also trying to put their efforts such as San
Francisco, California the city is working in the direction of sidetracking all of its left-over
away from landfills in the coming few years and has forbidden harmful items like plastic
bags and water bottles. The innovative city like Berlin, Germany has a vast network of
charging stations, electric bike, rental kiosks and bike paths to inspire populations to
dispensation their cars behind. More than 40 governments wide-reaching have now
implemented some kind of price on carbon, whichever through direct taxes on fossil
fuels or over and done with cap-and-trade lineups.

PART3:

The scuffle to turn the world of industry zone more sustainable has realized
countless of the world’s largest corporations step up with assurances to decrease
their use of water, energy and other scarce materials. So nowadays battle is
turning towards to supply chains, because supply chain plays major role in
carbon emission so that almost all of the world’s leading retail powerhouses
boosting their suppliers to turn out to be more sustainable as well.
For example a customer from UK buying a TV manufactured in China, which state
have to take responsibility and accountable for the carbon emissions sustained during
its manufacture?
This quandary exemplifies two different accounting approaches which should be
straighten out as we struggle to plan strategies for a further sustainable future. By the
manufacture perspective according to accounting, China has to be accountable for the
carbon emissions rose on Chinese territory. A substitute is the consumption
perspective according to this perspective, the UK have to be accountable for driving
force, as product export to the UK is motivating production, and a UK customer is the
prime receiver of the final product.
Household’s residence in life-threatening environments usually sustain higher carbon
emissions because of energy use for space heating and for air conditioning. The
fashion industry was accountable for at least 4% of global greenhouse-gas emissions in
2018 which is much higher than the carbon output of Germany, France and the United
Kingdom collectively.

In the field of Agriculture Land O’Lakes an enormous cooperative delivers assets to

agriculture startups and provides them resources to track eco-friendly agriculture
practices. John Deere. An equipment company for farming goals to recycle 85% of
materials and decrease carbon emissions on 90% on new products to generate
sustainable inventory. Cargill, plots emissions to lesser carbon output by the total
supply chain and has a goal to decrease greenhouse gas emissions by 10% till 2025.
The grocery delivery services of Good Eggs limited its carbon emissions by only
obtaining local, sustainably grown food and demanding a completely see-through
supply chain. The business Stony field Organic procedures is to cut down its carbon
emissions by 30% till 2030 by concentrating on energy and waste preservation,
maintainable wrapping and logistics for sustainability.

A big industry of Automotive has played a greater role in its carbon emission but now
these retailers are trying to sustain the environment like, the BMW Group is frequently
named as the world’s recorded sustainable car manufacturer for its hard work to create
fuel-saving and substitute cars with unpolluted production procedures. Valeo a French
company rated as the 5th most sustainable in industry, has devoted millions in
sustainability and produces innovative way out to decrease its cars’ carbon emissions.
Honda is rated as one of the best fuel-efficient auto manufacturers in the United States.
Due to its pioneering does to cut carbon emissions and grow a hydrogen fuel-powered
vehicle.

Other industrial zone like manufacturing, hotel/restaurants, Retailer, Software

companies, Construction companies ,these companies are prominent the mode to a
carbon-neutral future by proactively discovering the ways to decrease their carbon
emission and footprints and to help the environment for sustainable future.
 REFERENCES:
 Albeck-Ripka, L. (2019). How to Reduce Your Carbon Footprint. The
New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/guides/year-of-living-
better/how-to-reduce-your-carbon-footprint
 Bălan, C. (n.d.). CARBON-FOOTPRINT POLICY OF THE TOP TEN
GLOBAL RETAILERS: CONTRIBUTION TO SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT. Retrieved April 4, 2021, from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6502294.pdf
 ‌Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2016). Understanding Households as
Drivers of Carbon Emissions. Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology, 181–
203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_9
 Carbon Trust, 2007. Carbon footprinting. London: Carbon Trust. [Online]
Available at: http:// www.carbontrust.co.uk/solutions/CarbonFootprinting/ [ .

Retrieved April 4, 2021].

 Cogan, D. Good, M. Kantor, G. & McAtter, E., 2008. Corporate governance and
climate change. Consumer and technology companies. Boston: Ceres. [Online]

Available at: http://www.ceres.org/Page.aspx?pid=1002 [Accessed 4 April 2021].

 Andrew, R., Davis, S. J., & Peters, G. (2013). Climate policy and
dependence on traded carbon. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034011
 Baiocchi, G., & Minx, J. (2010). Understanding changes in the UK’s CO2
emissions: A global perspective. Environmental Science and Technology,
44, 1177–1184
 Baiocchi, G., Minx, J., & Hubacek, K. (2010). The impact of social factors
and consumer behavior on carbon dioxide emissions in the United
Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14, 50–72
 Birnik, A. (2013). An evidence-based assessment of online carbon
calculators. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17, 280–
293
 Bows, A., & Barrett, J. (2010). Cumulative emission scenarios using a
consumption-based approach: A glimmer of hope? Future Science, 1,
161–175
 Caeiro, S., Ramos, T. B., & Huisingh, D. (2012). Procedures and criteria
to develop and evaluate household sustainable consumption
indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, 72–91
 Kagan, J. (n.d.). Carbon Tax. Investopedia.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/carbon-dioxide-tax.asp