STATEMENT OF FACTS

1) The Ranchi Municipal corporation decided to enter into contract with private contractors to
carry on the cleanliness drive across the city for which the corporation got advertisement
printed in the daily newspapers of the city.
2) It mentioned the expectation of the corporation as far as the work was considered. It
discussed as to what would be the duties of the successful contractor. It also mentioned that
the detailed terms (which are more or less in consonance with the accepted practices of
such work) and conditions can be obtained by visiting the office physically.
3) Akhil proved to be the successful one to grab the contract. The tenure of the contract was
for two years subject to periodical assessment by the corporation.
4) There was one important term in terms and condition paragraph of the document which
dictated that the contractor needed to provide his service free of cost for a period of one
month upfront so as to satisfy the corporation about his capability.
5) After a period of one month the corporation decided to revoke the contract for the reason
of unacceptable quality of the service provided by Akhil.
6) At this akhil brought an action against the corporation contending that he was not made
aware about this very important term and thereby he was misled for the mistake on the part
of the corporation
 ISSUE RAISED

1) WHETHER THERE WAS PROPOER COMMUNICATION ON THE PART OF PLAINTIFF AND

DEFENDANT?
 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
1) WHETHER THERE WAS PROPER COMMUNICATION ON THE PART OF PLAINTIFF AND
DEFENDANT?

It is humbly and respectfully submitted before the hon’ble court that there was no
proper communication of special terms and condition by the Ranchi municipal
corporation pertaining to the contract
 ARGUMENTS ADVANCED
It is humbly submitted before the hon’ble court that the communication was not clear
on the part of the defendant to Mr. Akhil.