Professional Documents
Culture Documents
, 2017.
FOUNDRY
Abstract—Thixoforging combined with low superheat casting (LSC) is a promising shaping process for alu-
minium casting alloys. LSC process is based on rapid solidification of an alloy which cast with low pouring
temperature. With this method, a feedstock material is produced with non-dendritic microstructure that
ready for spherisation in reheating sequence of further semi-solid process. Al-Si alloys are still castable even
at low temperatures due to their excellent fluidities. This study subjects to present spherisation of A356 and
A380 alloy billets cast with LSC process that provides appropriate beginning material with relatively high
sphericity. Obtained billet parts were reheated for different times at a semi-solid state temperature. Some of
these billets were directly quenched for observing the effects of reheating and the others were thixoforged.
With sufficient reheating time, deformation of thixoforging process did not significantly affect on the spher-
ical microstructure. Unnecessarily long reheating period caused excessive grain growth. A356 alloy had
higher spherisation tendency than A380 alloy under similar process conditions.
Keywords: Thixoforging, low superheat casting (LSC), A356 alloy, A380 alloy
DOI: 10.3103/S1067821217050066
489
490 GULER et al.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE ing temperature and the other ones were thixoforged
in a preheated open die by a hydraulic workshop press
Recycled A356 and A380 alloy ingots were supplied with 50% deformation ratio. The macrographs of as
from a local producer company. Chemical composi- cast and thixoforged specimens were given in Fig. 1.
tions of these alloys were given in Table 1. 1000 g of After grinding and polishing, specimens were etched
both alloys were melted with electric resistant furnace with 0.5% HF solution. Microstructural observations
and cast into cylindrical steel mould to produce billets and required measurements were carried out by using
with the dimension of 40 mm diameter and 310 mm Nikon Eclipse MA100 image analyser assisted light
height. For LSC process, A356 and A380 alloys were microscope. Brinell hardness of specimens were also
melted at 635 and 615°C, respectively. Those tempera- measured by a universal test device with 62.5 kg load
tures represent 20°C above their liquidus temperatures and 2.5 mm tip diameter.
(615°C for A356, 595°C for A380) [15]. Cast billets
were cut off into parts in 40 mm length and one as cast
specimen was earmarked from each alloy. Reheating RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
temperatures of alloys were determined 20°C below LSC process suppresses the dendritic structure of
liquidus temperatures, thusly, A356 and A380 alloy conventional casting and prevents formation of long
billet parts were reheated at 595 and 575°C, respec- dendrite arms. In Fig. 2, as cast microstructures of
tively. Two billet parts were reheated in 20, 40, 60 and A356 and A380 alloys cast with LSC technique were
80 min for each alloy. One of these parts were directly given. These alloys are hypoeutectic Al-Si alloys
quenched (in water at room temperature) from reheat- namely, light areas imply α-Al phase while darker grey
zones imply the Al-Si eutectic structure. Al-Si casting
alloys have sufficient fluidity even under low super-
heat conditions, as a result of this, billet castings were
performed without any pouring problem.
With LSC process, alloys were prepared to further
semi-solid processes by formation of non-dendritic
and relatively spherical microstructure. Post reheating
process increased sphericity gradually. The micro-
structures of quenched and thixoforged A356 alloy bil-
lets, which were reheated at 595°C for 20, 40, 60 and
Fig. 1. From left to right: as cast, 20, 40, 60 and 80 min 80 min respectively, were given in Fig. 3. 20 min
reheated then thixoforged round billet specimens. reheating time did not change the as cast structure
200 µm 200 µm
Quenched Forged
20 min
200 µm 200 µm
40 min
200 µm 200 µm
60 min
200 µm 200 µm
80 min
200 µm 200 µm
Quenched Forged
20 min
200 µm 200 µm
40 min
200 µm 200 µm
60 min
200 µm 200 µm
80 min
200 µm 200 µm
260 1.0
240 A356 A356
0.9 A380
220 A380
0.8
Average grain size, µm
200
Index of sphericity
180 0.7
160 0.6
140
0.5
120
100 0.4
80 0.3
60 0.2
40
20 0.1
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 20 40 60 80
(as cast) Time, min (as cast) Time, min
Fig. 5. Average grain sizes of as cast and quenched speci- Fig. 6. Sphericity indexes of as cast and quenched speci-
mens. mens.
completely. However, it provides more homogenous cumulative increasing in grain size of A380 alloy was
eutectic distribution. Breaking down of α-Al grains higher than A356 alloy under similar reheating condi-
was started after 20 min reheating and gradually tions.
increased with holding time. Spherisation of α-Al Brinell hardness results of all specimens were given
became remarkable after 40 min heating and spherical in Fig. 7. Except 20 min reheating time, gradually
light grains were prominent at 60 and 80 min holding decreasing of hardness was apparent according to
times. In 80 min reheating time, higher spherisation measurements. Moreover, decreasing of A380 speci-
and grain coarsening were apparent. Up to 80 min mens was more remarkable. This situation was com-
reheating time, thixoforging in 50% ratio changed patible with grain size changes. Grain size increment
microstructures significantly and the deformation tex- in 20 min reheating time was very limited even it
tures can be observable. However, the spherisation in slightly decreased in A356 alloy. More important from
microstructure of 80 min reheated specimen was this, homogenous redistribution of refined eutectic
changed slightly by the effect of the forging process. structure increases hardness of 20 min reheated spec-
This situation is an evidence of complete remelting of imens. Another remarkable fact in these results is that
the eutectic structure in reheating and its flow among the hardness of quenched specimens were higher than
α-Al grains during forging. The increment in liquefac- deformed ones. Cooling speed difference was the main
tion during reheating period caused increasing of billet reason of this findings. Quenched specimens were
fragmentation which can be obviously seen from directly cooled from reheating temperature while
Fig. 1.
The micrographs of A380 billets reheated at 575°C
were given in Fig. 4. Microstructural evolution of A380-50% deformation
A380 billets under both quenched and thixoforged 115 A380-quenched
110 A356-50% deformation
conditions were very similar with A356 billets in many A356-quenched
ways. However, spherisation of A380 alloy was rela- 105
tively lower than A356 alloy. Also unlike to A356 alloy, 100
Hardness (HB)
deformed samples were air cooled after forging pro- 4. Wang, S.C., Zhou, N., Qi, W.J., and Zheng, K.H.,
cess. Rapid cooling shows modification effect on Microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 alu-
eutectic structure that cause increase in hardness of minum alloy wheels prepared by thixo-forging com-
Al-Si alloys. bined with a low superheat casting process, Trans. Non-
ferrous Met. Soc. China (English Ed.), 2014, vol. 24,
no. 7, pp. 2214–2219.
CONCLUSIONS 5. Tahamtan, S., Golozar, M.A., Karimzadeh, F., and
Niroumand, B., Microstructure and tensile properties
For increase efficiency of LSC process, the casting of thixoformed A356 alloy, Mater. Charact., 2008,
temperature was chosen as low as possible. This pro- vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 223–228.
cess has great potential on semi-solid processing of 6. Salleh, M.S., Omar, M.Z., Alhawari, K.S., Moham-
Al‒Si casting alloys. A356 and A380 alloy billets were med, M.N., Ali, M.A.M., and Mohamad, E., Micro-
cast at just 20°C over their liquidus temperatures structural evolution and mechanical properties of
which cannot be applicable for conventional gravity thixoformed A319 alloys containing variable amounts
net shape castings. With its simple nature, LSC pro- of magnesium, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China,
cess may be the easiest and the cheapest technique to 2016, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2029–2042.
manufacture semi-products for thixoforming pro- 7. Ogris, E., Development of Al–Si–Mg alloys for semi-
cesses. The most important property of a semi-solid solid processing and Silicon Spheroidization Treatment
process was producing the spherical microstructure. (SST) for Al–Si cast alloys, 2002, no. 14803, p. 138.
Firstly, this study gradually shows spherisation process 8. Chung, I.G., Bolouri, A., and Kang, C.G., A study on
of billets cast with LSC during reheating and the effects semisolid processing of A356 aluminum alloy through
of thixoforging on these billets. It was clear that both vacuum-assisted electromagnetic stirring, Int. J. Adv.
alloys were suitable for shaping by thixoforging com- Manuf. Technol., 2012, vol. 58, no. 1–4, pp. 237–245.
bined with LSC process. However, A356 alloy came 9. Zhao, Z., Chen, Q., Hu, C., Huang, S., and Wang, Y.,
one step ahead with higher spherisation property. Near-liquidus forging, partial remelting and thixoforg-
ing of an AZ91D + Y magnesium alloy, J. Alloys
Compd., 2009, vol. 485, no. 1–2, pp. 627–636.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 10. Fan, Z., Semisolid metal processing, Int. Mater. Rev.,
The work has been supported by the Yildiz Techni- 2002, vol. 47/2, no. 5, pp. 49–85.
cal University Scientific Research Projects Coordina- 11. Xia, K. and Tausig, G., Liquidus casting of a wrought
tion Department. Project Number 2015-07-02- aluminum alloy 2618 for thixoforming, Mater. Sci. Eng. A,
GEP03. 1998, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 1–10.
12. Yurko, J.A., Niu, X.P., and Pinwill, I., Thixocasting of
a near-liquidus cast Al–Mg based alloy, 1999, J. Mater.
REFERENCES Sci. Lett., vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 1869–1870.
1. Gencalp Irizalp, S. and Saklakoglu, N., Effect of Fe- 13. Mullins, W.W. and Sekerka, R.F., Morphological Sta-
rich intermetallics on the microstructure and mechan- bility of a Particle Growing by Diffusion or Heat Flow,
ical properties of thixoformed A380 aluminum alloy, J. Appl. Phys., 1963, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 323.
Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., 2014, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 58–62. 14. Chalmers, B., The structure of ingots, J. Aust. Inst.
2. Zeren, M., Effect of copper and silicon content on Met., 1963, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 255–263.
mechanical properties in Al–Cu–Si–Mg alloys, 15. ASM Handbook, Vol. 2: Properties and Selection: Non-
J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, vol. 169, no. 2, ferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, USA,
pp. 292–298. 1990.
3. Ejiofor, J.U. and Reddy, R.G., Developments in the 16. Ostwald, W., Studies on the formation and transforma-
processing and properties of particulate Al–Si compos- tion of solid bodies, Z. Phys. Chem., 1897, vol. 22,
ites, JOM, 1997, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 31–37. pp. 289–330.