You are on page 1of 6

j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s r e s e a r c h a n d t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 2 1 ; 1 4 : 3 1 3 4 e3 1 3 9

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmrt

Short Communication

Precipitation of dispersoids in AleMgeSi alloys


with Cu addition

Fang-Zhen Liu a,b,d, Jian Qin a,b,*, Zhen Li a,b, Cheng-Bin Yu a,b,d,
Xing Zhu c, Hiromi Nagaumi a,b,***, Bo Zhang d
a
School of Iron and Steel, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215021, China
b
High-Performance Metal Structural Materials Research Institute, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215021, China
c
Analysis and Testing Center, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China
d
Shandong Weiqiao Aluminum &Electricity Co., Ltd, Binzhou, 256200, China

article info abstract

Article history: Nanoscale a-Al(FeMn)Si dispersoids in Al alloys play a vital role in improving the recrys-
Received 4 June 2021 tallization resistance and mechanical properties of alloys at elevated temperatures. This
Accepted 25 August 2021 study investigates the influence of Cu on the precipitation behavior of a-dispersoids in Al
Available online 30 August 2021 eMgeSi alloys during heat treatment at 500  C. a-dispersoids in an alloy without Cu
addition had rod- or plate-like morphologies. The addition of Cu effectively inhibits the
Keywords: precipitation of a-dispersoids through the formation of fine spherical dispersoids, resulting
AleMgeSi alloy enhanced mechanical properties of the alloy at elevated temperatures. Evidence from
Crystal structure high-resolution transmission electron microscopy demonstrated that the rod- or plate-like
a-Dispersoids structures have simple cubic structures, whereas the spherical a-dispersoids are coherent
Elevated temperature mechanical with the Al matrix along the [101] zone axis of Al, resulting in finer dispersoids, higher
properties thermal stability, and lower coarsening rates. However, its crystal structure requires
Precipitation further investigation.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC
BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

AleMgeSi alloys [1e5], which are promising candidates for


1. Introduction elevated-temperature strengthening applications because of
their excellent thermal stability. However, owing to the rela-
AleMgeSi alloys have garnered significant attention in the tively high temperature (550  C) of homogenization, a-dis-
transportation industry because of the pressing need to persoids coarsen easily [6].
reduce carbon emissions. AleMgeSi alloys are required to Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the
have moderate strength at elevated temperatures for a long improvement mechanism of the dispersion strengthening
duration to maintain overall structural stability and ensure caused by a-dispersoid and high-temperature thermal stabil-
sufficient escape time in case of fire hazards. a-Al(FeMn)Si ity properties [7]. The addition of transition metal elements,
dispersoids precipitate during homogenized heat treatment of such as Mn and Cr, can effectively promote precipitation and

* Corresponding author.
*** Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: jian.qin@uqac.ca (J. Qin), zhanghai888jp@suda.edu.cn (H. Nagaumi).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.123
2238-7854/© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s r e s e a r c h a n d t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 2 1 ; 1 4 : 3 1 3 4 e3 1 3 9 3135

increase the number density of dispersoids [8]. In addition, the thermal stability of the alloys was measured through micro-
low diffusion rates of Mn and Cr ensure the thermal stability hardness tests at ambient temperature levels, which were
of dispersoids at high temperatures [9]. performed on a Buehler Wilson microhardness test machine
Numerous studies [10e20] propose that better thermal with a load of 200 g and a dwell time of 20 s on polished
stability can be achieved in Al and Ni alloys by reducing the samples. Optical microscopy (OM) was performed to verify the
lattice mismatch between the precipitates and matrix. Fine distribution and precipitation of the dispersoid zone. Trans-
et al. [14] observed that particles with a lower lattice mismatch mission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM
present lower interfacial energy. In Ostwald ripening, the (HRTEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX)
growth of larger particles that consume smaller particles is were performed at 200 kV to characterize the morphology,
driven by a reduction in the total interfacial free energy. Thus, size, and chemistry of the dispersoids.
a lower interfacial energy is desirable for the particles to resist
coarsening [14]. The transformation from semi-coherence to
coherence effectively reduces the lattice mismatch, thereby 3. Results and discussion
reducing the interfacial energy and elastic strain energy, and
resulting in an improvement in thermal stability and me- Fig. 1 shows the evolution of microhardness after annealing at
chanical properties of the particles [16]. Therefore, adjusting 300  C for different holding times (Fig. 1(a)) and tensile prop-
the crystal structure is a promising approach to simulta- erties at the same temperature after soaking for 100h (Fig. 1(b))
neously improve the a-dispersoid thermal stability and alloy of 0Cu and 0.6Cu alloys. In the initial stage, the microhardness
mechanical properties. of both alloys decreased rapidly during annealing for 20 h and
However, extensive research on the crystal structure of thereafter became stable with prolonged annealing. During
dispersoids in AleMgeSi alloys has not been conducted. In the entire annealing process, the 0.6Cu alloy always had a
this study, AleMgeSi alloys with and without 0.6 wt% Cu higher microhardness than that of the 0Cu alloy. The me-
addition were heat-treated to investigate precipitation chanical properties of 6xxx alloys deteriorated rapidly
behavior and microstructural evolution of a-dispersoids and because of overcoarsening of Mg2Si or Q [21,22]. Therefore, the
the role of Cu in the precipitation behavior. contribution of the precipitates to the strength is insignificant.
The difference in microhardness of both alloys in the stable
stage was mainly due to a dispersoids, which were reported to
2. Experimental be thermally stable in a range of 200e350  C [22]. After
annealing at 300  C for 100 h, the yield strengths of the 0Cu
The alloys with compositions of Ale0.82Mge1.07Sie0.71Mne and 0.6Cu alloys at annealing temperature were 26 and
0.19Cre0.05Fe (0Cu alloy) and Ale0.84Mge1.04Sie0.58Cue 54 MPa, respectively. According to the Orowan strengthening
0.71Mne0.2Cre0.05Fe (0.6Cu alloy) used in this study were mechanism [23], a dispersoids in the 0.6Cu alloy should have a
cast to a copper mold of 24  100  200 mm3. The cast ingots higher volume fraction or finer size than those of the 0Cu
were heated to 500  C at a heating rate of 180  C/h and held for alloy.
24 h. The homogenized samples were thereafter dipped in To reveal the precipitation and distribution of a-disper-
water to analyze the evolution of a-dispersoids. The alloys soids in both alloys, which were heated at 500  C for 24 h, OM
homogenized for 10 h were hot forged from 20 to 4 mm images taken from deeply etched samples were utilized. The
thickness with a reduction ratio of 80% after a single pass at a-dispersoids represented by etching pits are shown in Fig. 2 (a
500  C on a laboratory-scale forging machine. The forged & b). The a-dispersoids precipitated in the 0Cu alloy (Fig. 2(a))
samples were solution-treated at 560  C for 1 h and dipped in were characteristic of large and dendritic areas with a greyer
water at ambient temperature levels. To evaluate the me- color than that of the 0.6Cu alloy (Fig. 2(b)). This indicates that
chanical properties of the alloys at elevated temperatures, the the 0Cu alloy has a higher fraction or larger size of a-disper-
solution-treated specimens were annealed at 300  C for 100 h soids. Hence, the area fraction of a-dispersoids in the 0.6Cu
and thereafter tensiled at 300  C using a universal mechanical alloy is lesser than that of the 0Cu alloy because the etching
testing machine according to the ASTM E21 standard. The pits are too fine to be observed through OM.

Fig. 1 e Microhardness evolution of sample annealing (a) at 300  C for varying time durations and tensile properties (b) at
300  C after annealing for 100 h.
3136 j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s r e s e a r c h a n d t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 2 1 ; 1 4 : 3 1 3 4 e3 1 3 9

Fig. 2 e OM images of a-dispersoids precipitated in (a) 0Cu and (b) 0.6Cu alloys soaked at 500  C for 24 h.

TEM was employed to further observe the morphology and Apparently, a-dispersoids in the 0.6Cu alloy have a finer size,
evolution of the a-dispersoids. The TEM micrographs of a- which is related to their crystal structure. As shown in
dispersoids in 0Cu and 0.6Cu alloys that were heated to 500  C Fig. 4(b), the frequency of spherical a-dispersoids in the 0.6Cu
(Fig. 3(a & d)) and held for 4 h (Fig. 3(b & e)) and 24 h (Fig. 3(c & alloy is clearly higher than that of the 0Cu alloy and decreases
f)) are shown in Fig. 3, respectively. The a-dispersoids in the with increasing soaking time owing to transformation into
0Cu alloy (Fig. 3(a)) were characterized by a rod- or plate-like rod- or plate-like morphology. To analyze the coarsening of a-
morphology and a small number of spherical shapes. Mean- dispersoids in detail, the sizes of rod- or plate-like and
while, most of the a-dispersoids in the 0.6Cu alloy have a spherical a-dispersoids in 0Cu and 0.6Cu alloys were
spherical morphology (Fig. 3(d)). Compared to the 0Cu alloy, measured and are shown in Fig. 4(c & d), respectively. The a-
the a-dispersoids precipitated in the 0.6Cu alloy were clearly dispersoids in the 0Cu alloy exhibited similar coarsening rates
finer. When the soaking time of the homogenization heat regardless of morphology. Meanwhile, the spherical a-dis-
treatment increased to 24 h, the size of the a-dispersoids in persoids in the 0.6Cu alloy have a lower coarsening rate than
both alloys increased, whereas the number density decreased the rod- or plate-like a-dispersoids. Hence, the addition of Cu
(Fig. 3(c) and (f)). A large number of spherical a-dispersoids in not only refines a-dispersoids but also reduces their coars-
the 0.6Cu alloy (Fig. 3(f)) transformed into disc- or rod-like a- ening rate.
dispersoids but were finer than those of the 0Cu alloy Numerous studies have shown that a-dispersoids have a
(Fig. 3(c)). simple cubic (SC) or body-centered cubic structure. It is
The quantitative analysis of the evolution of a-dispersoids interesting that spherical a-dispersoids in 0.6Cu alloy as
in 0Cu and 0.6Cu alloys as a function of soaking time at 500  C shown in Fig. 3(d) appear in “coffee-beam” form marked by
is shown in Fig. 4. The equivalent diameter of the a-disper- yellow arrows, which is known as AshbyeBrown contrast [24].
soids in both alloys increased with prolonged soaking time. The contrast is caused by elastic distortions of the matrix near

Fig. 3 e TEM micrographs of a-dispersoids in 0Cu (a, b, c) and 0.6Cu (d, e, f) alloys heated to 500  C and soaked for 4 and 24 h,
respectively.
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s r e s e a r c h a n d t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 2 1 ; 1 4 : 3 1 3 4 e3 1 3 9 3137

Fig. 4 e Dispersoids equivalent diameter (a) and spherical dispersoids frequency statistics (b) of experimental alloys at
500  C with soaking time. Evolution of dispersoids’ size with different morphologies in 0Cu (c) and 0.6Cu (d) alloys at
500  C with soaking time.

the particles, indicating that a-dispersoids are coherent with diffraction conditions, and in situ bright field images are
the Al matrix. Fig. 5(a) shows the selected area diffraction shown in Fig. 5 (b) and (c), respectively. The results presented
pattern of a-dispersoids in the 0.6Cu alloy along the [110]Al in Fig. 5 (b) and (c) demonstrate that the a-dispersoids, which
zone axis when it was heated to 500  C. The superlattice are coherent with the Al matrix, are spherical.
pattern of the a-dispersoids is parallel to the Al matrix along During soaking at 500  C, a-dispersoids in the 0.6Cu alloy
the (200)Al. TEM observations of the centered dark-field image mainly have three morphologies, that is, rod-like, plate-like,
of a-dispersoids, which were recorded using the {100} super- and spherical morphologies. HRTEM was employed to reveal
lattice reflections near the <011> direction under two-beam the high-magnification details and crystal structures of these

Fig. 5 e TEM micrographs analysis of a-dispersoids in 0.6Cu alloy heated to 500  C, and selected area diffraction pattern
along [110] zone axis and (200) plane of Al (a), in situ dark field (b) and bright field (c) images.
3138 j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s r e s e a r c h a n d t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 2 1 ; 1 4 : 3 1 3 4 e3 1 3 9

Fig. 6 e TEM micrographs of 0.6Cu alloy heated at 500  C for 1h (a). HRTEM micrographs obtained along the [100]Al zone axis:
(b) plate-like and [101]Al zone axis: (e) spherical a-dispersoids, corresponding diffraction pattern are shown in (c) and (f).
Indexing of the diffraction pattern shown in (c) and (f) are presented in (d) and (g), respectively. Line scan result of EDX
cross plate-like and spherical a-dispersoids (h).

forms of a-dispersoids based on fast Fourier transform (FFT) and higher mechanical properties at high temperatures.
diffractograms. The HRTEM and FFT diffractograms of a-dis- However, the crystal structure needs to be further examined.
persoids in the 0.6Cu alloy held at 500  C for 1 h, which have The presence of a large number of spherical dispersoids in the
various morphologies, are shown in Fig. 6(a). The results prove 0.6Cu alloy led to improved mechanical properties at elevated
that plate- and rod-like a-dispersoids have the same SC temperatures.
structure. The HRTEM image and simulated FFT diffractogram
of plate-like a-dispersoids presented in the atomic plane are
shown in Fig. 6(bed). The orientation relationship between the Declaration of Competing Interest
a-dispersoid and Al lattice was found to be (Fig. 6(c)): [100]Al//
[111]a. The HRTEM image and simulated FFT diffractogram of The authors declare that they have no known competing
spherical a-dispersoids are presented in Fig. 6(eeg), respec- financial interests or personal relationships that could have
tively. The crystal structure of the spherical a-dispersoids is appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
coherent with the Al matrix along the [101] zone axis of Al, but
it needs to be further determined. This indicates that there is a
lower lattice mismatch between the spherical a-dispersoids
Acknowledgments
and a-Al matrix, thereby improving the thermal stability of
the spherical a-dispersoids. According to the EDX line scan-
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by
ning result (Fig. 6 (h)), which scanned cross a plate-like dis-
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.
persoids and spherical a-dispersoids, as shown in Fig. 6 (a),
U1864209).
both a-dispersoids were composed of Al, Mn, and Si, and there
was no significant variation in the Cu and Cr contents in the
dispersoids. Further analysis and characterization of spherical references
a-dispersoids will be necessary to determine the effect of Cu
on the crystal structure of a-dispersoids.
[1] Lodgaard L, Ryum N. Distribution of Mn- and Cr-containing
dispersoids in Al-Mg-Si-alloys. Mater Sci Forum
4. Conclusion 2000;331:945e50. 337.
[2] Lodgaard L, Ryum N. Precipitation of dispersoids containing
The addition of Cu promotes the formation of spherical a- Mn and/or Cr in AleMgeSi alloys. Mater Sci Eng A
2000;283(1):144e52.
dispersoids that are finer than rod- or plate-like a-dispersoids
[3] Zhang G, Nagaumi H, Han Y, Xu Y, Parish C, Zhai T. Effects of
in the alloy without Cu during homogenized heat treatment.
Mn and Cr additions on the recrystallization behavior of Al-
TEM and HRTEM analyses revealed that the rod- or plate-like Mg-Si-Cu alloys. Mater Sci Forum 2016;877:172e9.
a-dispersoids had SC structures. Meanwhile, the spherical a- [4] Dehmas M, Aeby-Gautier E, Archambault P, Serrie re M.
dispersoids are coherent with the Al matrix along the [101] Interaction between eutectic intermetallic particles and
zone axis of Al, which resulted in a higher thermal stability dispersoids in the 3003 aluminum alloy during
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s r e s e a r c h a n d t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 2 1 ; 1 4 : 3 1 3 4 e3 1 3 9 3139

homogenization treatments. Metall Mater Trans A [14] Zedalis MS, Fine ME. Precipitation and ostwald ripening in
2013;44(2):1059e73. dilute AI Base-Zr-V alloys. Metall Trans A
[5] Hu R, Ogura T, Tezuka H, Sato T, Liu Q. Dispersoid formation 1986;17(12):2187e98.
and recrystallization behavior in an Al-Mg-Si-Mn alloy. J [15] Fine ME. Precipitation hardening of aluminum alloys. Metall
Mater Sci Technol 2010;26(3):237e43. Trans A 1975;6(4):625.
[6] Rakhmonov J, Liu K, Rometsch P, Parson N, Chen XG. Effects [16] Liu C, Li Y, Zhu L, Shi S. Effect of coherent lattice mismatch
of Al(MnFe)Si dispersoids with different sizes and number on the morphology and kinetics of ordered precipitates. J
densities on microstructure and ambient/elevated- Mater Eng Perform 2018;27.
temperature mechanical properties of extruded AleMgeSi [17] Liu C, Li Y, Zhu L, Shi S. Effect of coherent lattice mismatch
AA6082 alloys with varying Mn content. J Alloys Compd on the morphology and kinetics of ordered precipitates. J
2021;861:157937. Mater Eng Perform 2018;27(9):4968e77.
[7] Wang R, Jiang S, Chen Ba, Zhu Z. Size effect in the Al3Sc [18] Zhu JZ, Wang T, Ardell AJ, Zhou SH, Liu ZK, Chen LQ. Three-
dispersoid-mediated precipitation and mechanical/electrical dimensional phase-field simulations of coarsening kinetics
properties of Al-Mg-Si-Sc alloys. J Mater Sci Technol of g0 particles in binary NieAl alloys. Acta Mater
2020;57:78e84. 2004;52(9):2837e45.
[8] Elgallad E, Liu K, Zhang Z, Chen XG. Effect of transition [19] Vaithyanathan V, Chen LQ. 3D simulation of coarsening of g0
elements on dispersoid formation and elevated-temperature precipitates in a Ni-Al alloy. MRS Proc 1999;580.
mechanical properties in 6082 aluminum alloy. Phil Mag [20] Nathal M, Mackay R, Garlick R. Temperature dependence of
2020;101:1e21. g-g' lattice mismatch in Nickel-base superalloys. Mater Sci
[9] Du Y, Chang YA, Huang B, Gong W, Jin Z, Xu H, et al. Eng 1985;75.
Diffusion coefficients of some solutes in fcc and liquid Al: [21] Usta M, Glicksman ME, Wright RN. The effect of heat
critical evaluation and correlation. Mater Sci Eng A treatment on Mg2Si coarsening in aluminum 6105 alloy.
2003;363(1e2):140e51. Metall Mater Trans A 2004;35(2):435e8.
[10] Knipling KE, Dunand DC, Seidman DN. Precipitation [22] Li C, Liu K, Chen XG. Improvement of elevated-temperature
evolution in AleZr and AleZreTi alloys during aging at strength and recrystallization resistance via Mn-containing
450e600 C. Acta Mater 2008;56(6):1182e95. dispersoid strengthening in Al-Mg-Si 6082 alloys. J Mater Sci
[11] Chen YC, Fine ME, Weertman J. Microstructural evolution Technol 2020;39:135e43.
and mechanical properties of rapidly solidified Al Zr V alloys [23] Jin L, Liu K, Chen XG. Evolution of dispersoids and their
at high temperatures. Acta Metall Mater 1990;38:771e80. effects on elevated-temperature strength and creep
[12] Parameswaran V, Weertman J, Fine M. Coarsening behavior resistance in Al-Si-Cu 319 cast alloys with Mn and Mo
of L12 phase in an AlZrTi alloy. Scripta Metall additions. Mater Sci Eng A 2020;770.
1989;23:147e50. [24] Mochugovskiy A, Tabachkova N, Mikhaylovskaya A.
[13] Chen YC, Fine ME, Weertman J, Lewis RE. Coarsening behavior Annealing induced precipitation of nanoscale icosahedral
of L12 structured Al3(ZrxV1-x) precipitates in rapidly solidified quasicrystals in aluminum based alloy. Mater Lett
Al-Zr-V alloy. Scripta Metall 1987;21:1003e8. 2019;247:200e3.

You might also like