You are on page 1of 3

www.railwaygazette.

com | August 2010

TRACK DESIGN IN FOCUS


Track to the future European reform
Concrete slab trackforms Policy uncertainty remains
gain acceptance PAGE 36 20 years on PAGE 60
TRACK DESIGN | MATERIALS

FFU synthetic sleepers


offer material gains
SLEEPERS European railways and metro operators are
slowly starting to adopt glass fibre-reinforced synthetic
sleepers as a more durable alternative to wood.

widely in railway construction, water


supply and drainage systems, civil
engineering applications, architec-
tural designs, industrial production
and aquaculture.
FFU is produced using a pultru-
sion process. A sheet of glass fibre
threads is pulled through an extru-
sion press, coated with polyurethane
and hardened at a high temperature
to produce a high-grade, non-porous
material. This is resistant to corro-
sion from chemicals deposited on
the track by passing trains.
Dipl-Ing Dr Günther Koller
Koocoo Technology & Consulting GmbH Common in Japan

O
n May 29 2010 Hamburger Sekisui produced its first plastic
Hochbahn installed a sleeper in 1978 in response to a de-
turnout constructed from mand from Japanese railways for a
FFU synthetic sleepers at material that was more resistant to
its Farmsen depot. The event marked weathering than wood. Plastic sleep-
a further step in the gradual adop- ers have been installed widely across
tion of fibre-reinforced foam ure- the country since the mid-1980s,
thane sleepers outside Japan. particularly on switches, turnouts,
The turnout installed by HHA was bridges and other projects where
prefabricated by Voestalpine subsidi- maximising maintenance intervals
ary BWG using FFU sleepers sup- is a priority. FFU is also commonly
plied by Japanese company Sekisui used on bridges to support the track-
Chemical. Because of the limited ac- form because of the limited access
cess to the worksite at Farmsen, the and constrained worksites. Japan’s
turnout was delivered to the depot Railway Technical Research Insti-
in sections before being rapidly and tute has calculated that, on average,
precisely assembled from the prefab- a synthetic sleeper could be expected
ricated modules. After the ballast was to survive 100 million load cycles
relaid, the first trainsets were able to over a 50-year lifespan.
use the turnout. The first applications in Europe be-
gan in Austria in 2004, when Wiener
High-strength material Linien replaced the trackform on a
bridge at Zollamtsbrücke. The metro
FFU is a lightweight corrosion- operator believes that the FFU bear-
resistant material formed of rigid- ers should last for up to 50 years,
foamed urethane reinforced with whereas track renewal and corrosion
endless glass fibres. It is a high- protection now take place at 30-year
strength structural material, its intervals.
weight is comparable to wood, and ÖBB Infrastruktur Betrieb in-
it is workable like wood, durable stalled its first FFU sleepers on the
and water resistant. It has been used Austrian main line network in 2005,
and the first application in Germany
Trackform with FFU sleepers can came in 2008, when Voestalpine
be pre-fabricated to allow rapid
installation at the worksite using installed a 74 m turnout with 136
conventional tools. sleepers in a private siding on the

42 Railway Gazette International | August 2010


MATERIALS | TRACK DESIGN

Left: FFU sleepers


can be cut using
the same hand-
held tools as
wood.

Right: Synthetic
sleepers
have been in
widespread use
on Japanese
railways since the
mid-1980s.

Bayer ChemPark industrial railway durability of FFU over a sustained Table I. Railhead oscillation of FFU sleepers
near Leverkusen (RG 10.08 p776). period. In the first experiment, 20 after 3 million load cycles mm
EBA approval was achieved on July sleepers measuring 260 x 160 x Right base point Left base point
8 2009, at which point DB Netz, 2 600 mm were subjected to 3 mil-
Elastic oscillation 2∙12 1∙71
München metro operator MVV and lion load cycles replicating a 225 kN
Residual oscillation 0∙42 0∙29
HHA all expressed an interest in test- axleload (Table I).
ing FFU sleepers. Impact tests were also undertaken
MVV sees a particular advantage in accordance with DB Netz’s track
in the superior electrical isulation component procurement standards,
properties offered by FFU, and it and these showed that FFU sleepers
installed five sets of points with syn- withstood a far higher level of im-
thetic sleepers across its network at pact stress than wood, with only nar-
the beginning of 2010 to see whether row indentations at maximum load
there is any long-term safety benefits (Table II). No distortions in the
to be derived. DB Netz meanwhile overall shape were detected, which
sees FFU as a useful alternative for implies that the sleeper should main-
marshalling yard pointwork and tain track gauge even in the event of
curved track on bridges, where very a derailment.
precise sleeper dimensions may be In 2008, ÖBB contracted the Tech-
required. Based on previous experi- nical University of Graz to undertake
ence, ÖBB Infrastruktur Bau plans to a life-cycle cost analysis comparing
install Sekisui’s first FFU-sleepered conventional bridge timbers with the lifespan of FFU could be three to Technical
double-slip crossing as part of the FFU. The results suggested a positive five times that of a wooden sleeper. University of
München has
remodelling of Wien Hauptbahnhof long-term return could be assumed Key to the adoption of FFU is the undertaken
later this year. based on a longer lifespan and the speed and precision of the installa- rigorous
consequent reduction in mainte- tion. FFU sleepers can be ordered to static tests to
determine the
Endurance testing nance. Furthermore, FFU offers po- fit a specific requirement, and can be load-bearing
tential savings in the initial capital tooled down to a precision of just a characteristics of
A series of research projects over investment for complex track com- few millimetres during production. FFU sleepers.
the past two years has provided more ponents such as turnouts, switches The material is highly stable, en-
quantitative data on the perform- and crossings. The Graz study con- suring that there is no deformation
ance of FFU in track applications. In cluded that a return on investment of during delivery to the worksite. This
2008, Sekisui worked with Technical between 1∙35 and 1∙55 could be ex- also allows more rapid installation,
University of München to assess the pected. The study also suggested that whether on conventional track or on
bridges using steel joists. FFU sleep-
ers can be sheared using standard
hand-held tools, and holes for rail
fastenings can be drilled in the same
way as wood, using the same tools.
Furthermore, where sleepers are be-
ing replaced, the same fastenings can
be re-used. l

Table II. Comparison of FFU and


The modular wooden sleepers
turnout with
synthetic Pull-out Maximum
Material Notes
sleepers was strength kN load kN
installed at HHA’s FFU 61 240 No flaws in flexural area
Farmsen depot in
less than one day. Wood 35 80 Collapse of flexural zone

Railway Gazette International | August 2010 43

You might also like