You are on page 1of 5

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 79 (2010) 340–344

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/colsurfb

Silver nanoparticles impede the biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa


and Staphylococcus epidermidis
Kalimuthu Kalishwaralal, Selvaraj BarathManiKanth, Sureshbabu Ram Kumar Pandian,
Venkataraman Deepak, Sangiliyandi Gurunathan ∗
Department of Biotechnology, Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Kalasalingam University, Anand Nagar, Krishnankoil 626190, Tamilnadu, India

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Biofilms are ensued due to bacteria that attach to surfaces and aggregate in a hydrated polymeric matrix.
Received 7 January 2010 Formation of these sessile communities and their inherent resistance to anti-microbial agents are the
Received in revised form 14 April 2010 source of many relentless and chronic bacterial infections. Such biofilms are responsible play a major
Accepted 15 April 2010
role in development of ocular related infectious diseases in human namely microbial keratitis. Different
Available online 22 April 2010
approaches have been used for preventing biofilm related infections in health care settings. Many of these
methods have their own demerits that include chemical based complications; emergent antibiotic resis-
Keywords:
tant strains, etc. silver nanoparticles are renowned for their influential anti-microbial activity. Hence the
Anti-biofilm activity
Silver nanoparticles
present study over the biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles, exhibited a potential anti-biofilm
Keratitis activity that was tested in vitro on biofilms formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epider-
Pseudomonas aeruginosa midis during 24-h treatment. Treating these organisms with silver nanoparticles resulted in more than
Staphylococcus epidermidis 95% inhibition in biofilm formation. The inhibition was known to be invariable of the species tested. As
a result this study demonstrates the futuristic application of silver nanoparticles in treating microbial
keratitis based on its potential anti-biofilm activity.
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction charide that is involved in adherence and biofilm formation. These


two organisms are capable of adhesion and biofilm formation on CL
Contact lenses (CL) often get infected with bacteria, and pro- and even on the inner walls of lens storage cases [5–10]. The cells
longed usage of such lenses leads to microbial keratitis in eye. in the biofilm are distinct from their planktonic counterparts, since
Bacteria frequently adhere to the surface of the lens through a the biofilm augments resistance to drug therapy, disinfectants, and
biofilm matrix, a three-dimensional, gel-like, highly hydrated and the immune response of the host [7–9]. The biofilm on CL prolongs
locally charged environment, and using such lens can cause infec- the bacteria’s contact with the surface of the eye, thus increasing
tions in eye. Adhesion of these bacteria to CL may contribute its pathogenicity [10].
to the pathogenesis of infection and may be influenced by lens Earlier, in the 19th century, microbial infections were treated
surface properties [1–3]. The first step in biofilm formation is with 0.5% AgNO3 like Ophthalmia neonatorum (by German obste-
the adhesion of microbial cell to the surface by the exopolysac- trician Carl Crede), and for the prevention of infection in burns.
charides synthesized by the bacteria [4]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa When the era of the antibiotics began with the discovery of peni-
and Staphylococcus epidermidis have been well-known as the cillin, the use of silver slowly diminished [11]. But in the present
major causative agents of infectious keratitis. The Gram-negative scenario due to the emergence of biocide-resistant strains, once
opportunistic aerobic rod P. aeruginosa is ubiquitous and well again the use of silver for treating infections has gained impor-
adapted for growth in an aquatic environment, also synthesizes an tance. However, the use of ionic silver has one major drawback;
adhesive alginate extracellular matrix for biofilm formation. The they are easily inactivated by complexation and precipitation thus
Gram-positive aerobic coccus S. epidermidis is present as normal limiting the uses [12]. Here zerovalent silver nanoparticles can be
saprophytic flora on the skin, and it produces a surface polysac- a valuable alternative for ionic silver [13].
Nanosilver is one of non-toxic and safe antibacterial agents to
the human body. Besides, silver nanoparticles are also reported
to possess anti-fungal activity [14], anti-inflammatory effect [15],
∗ Corresponding author at: Department of Biotechnology & Chemical Engineering,
anti-viral activity [16] and anti-angiogenic activity [17,18]. But, sil-
Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Kalasalingam University (Kalasalingam
ver nanoparticles can be well applied in therapy safely when the
Academy of Research and Education), Anand Nagar, Krishnankoil 626 190, Tamil-
nadu, India. Tel.: +91 4563 289042; fax: +91 4563 289322.
effective concentrations of silver nanoparticles on various types of
E-mail address: lvsangs@yahoo.com (S. Gurunathan). organisms are determined.

0927-7765/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.04.014
K. Kalishwaralal et al. / Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 79 (2010) 340–344 341

There are many methods available for the synthesis of sil- Therefore assuming 100% conversion of all silver ions to silver
ver nanoparticles. Most chemical methods use a reducing agent nanoparticles,
(e.g, sodium borohydride) to reduce Ag+ to Ag0 and a stabilizer
3
(e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone) to control particle growth and prevent 3.14 × 10.5 × (50.0 × 10−7 ) × 6.023 × 1023
aggregation. However, these preparations often have problems N=
6 × 107.868
with particle stability and are difficult to scale up. In addition, there
is a demand for more environment-friendly production methods.
Alternatively, silver nanoparticles can also be synthesized biologi- i.e. N = 3837233.003
cally using bacteria [13].
The present study divulges the anti-microbial and anti-biofilm • Determine the molar concentration of the nanoparticle solution
ability of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles against P. using the following formula: (Liu et al. [20])
aeruginosa and S. epidermidis, the important causative agents of
keratitis. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the antibi- NT
C=
otic effect of silver nanoparticles on P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis NVNA
and its effect on the biofilm formation.
where C is the molar concentration of nanoparticle solution, NT
is the total number of silver atoms added as AgNO3 = 1 M, N is the
2. Materials and methods
number of atoms per nanoparticle (from calculation 1), V is the
volume of the reaction solution in L, NA is the Avogadro’s number
2.1. Strains used
(=6.023 × 1023 ).
Wild-type of Bacillus licheniformis, P. aeruginosa and S. epider-
midis were maintained in nutrient agar as well as sub cultured from 1 × 6.023 × 1023
C=
time to time in the microbiology laboratory during the study period. 3837233.003 × 1 × 6.023 × 1023

C = 2.606 × 10−7 M/L = 260 nM


2.2. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles
Further, the required concentration are made out from the
obtained values.
In a typical experiment, 2 g of wet B. licheniformis biomass was
taken in an Erlenmeyer’s flask. 1 mM AgNO3 solution was prepared
2.5. Determination of anti-microbial activity by well-diffusion
using deionized water and 100 mL of the solution mixture was
method
added to the biomass. Then the conical flask was kept in a shaker
at 37 ◦ C (200 rpm) for 24 h for the synthesis of nanoparticles [19].
The AgNPs synthesized from B. licheniformis were tested for anti-
microbial activity by conventional well-diffusion method against P.
2.3. Purification of silver nanoparticles aeruginosa and S. epidermidis [21]. The pure cultures of organisms
were sub cultured on nutrient broth at 37 ◦ C on a rotary shaker at
The cells from each Erlenmeyer flask were washed twice with 200 rpm. Wells of 6-mm diameter were made on Muller–Hinton
50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and re-suspended in 5 mL of the agar plates using gel puncture. Each strain was spread uniformly
same buffer. Ultrasonic disruption of cells was carried out with an onto the individual plates using sterile cotton swabs. Using a
ultrasonic processor (Sonics Vibra Cell VC-505/220, Newtown, USA) micropipette, 100 nM of the sample of nanoparticles solution was
over three 15 s periods, and with an interval of 45 s between peri- filled onto each well on all plates. After incubation at 37 ◦ C for 28 h,
ods. The resulting solution was centrifuged (16,000 rpm, 30 min) the different levels of zone of inhibition were measured.
and filtered through a 0.22 ␮m filter (Millipore,) to remove cell-
debris. Characterization of synthesized and purified particles was 2.6. Determination of biofilm formation by Congo red agar
carried out according to the method described previously [19]. method (CRA)
Samples for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis were
prepared on carbon-coated copper TEM grids. TEM measurements The determination of biofilm formation was carried out by the
were performed on a JEOL model 1200EX instrument operated at method described by Freeman et al. [22]. This method utilizes a
an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. specially prepared solid medium – brain heart infusion broth (BHI)
supplemented with 5% sucrose and Congo red for screening the for-
2.4. Determination of concentration of the silver nanoparticles mation of biofilm by P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis. The medium
composes of BHI (37 g/L), sucrose (50 g/L), agar No.1 (10 g/L) and
The concentration of silver nanoparticles was determined by the Congo red stain (0.8 g/L). Congo red was prepared in the form of
method which has been previously reported for Liu et al. [20] for concentrated aqueous solution and it was autoclaved at 121 ◦ C
gold nanoparticles. The calculation is as follows [20]. for 15 min, separately from other medium constituents. Following
autoclave, the concentrated solution was added to agar which was
• To determine the average number of atoms per nanoparticle (Liu previously cooled to 55 ◦ C. Plates were inoculated and incubated
et al. [20]) aerobically for 24–48 h at 37 ◦ C.

D3 2.7. Tissue culture plate method (TCP) – in vitro biofilm


N= NA formation assay
6M

where N is the number of atoms per nanoparticles,  = 3.14,  is To determine the efficacy of silver nanoparticles in elimination
the density of face centered, cubic (fcc) silver (=10.5 g/cm3 ), D is of formed biofilm, TCP method was carried out with suitable mod-
the average diameter of nanoparticles (=50 nm = 50 × 10−7 cm), ifications [23]. Individual wells of sterile, polystyrene, 96-well-flat
M is the atomic mass of silver (=107.868 g), NA is the number of bottom tissue culture plates were filled with 180 ␮L of BHI broth
atoms per mole (Avogadro’s number) (=6.023 × 1023 ). and inoculated with 10 ␮L of overnight culture. To the mixture
342 K. Kalishwaralal et al. / Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 79 (2010) 340–344

10 ␮L of silver nanoparticles were added from the stock so that


final concentration was made between 10 nM and 100 nM. The
tissue culture plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 ◦ C. After incu-
bation, content of each well was gently removed. The wells were
washed four times with 0.2 mL of phosphate buffer saline (PBS pH
7.2) to remove free-floating ‘planktonic’ bacteria. Biofilms formed
by adherent ‘sessile’ organisms in plate were fixed with sodium
acetate (2%) and stained with crystal violet (0.1%, w/v). Excess stain
was rinsed off by thorough washing with deionized water and
plates were kept for drying. After drying, 95% ethanol was added to
the wells and the optical densities (OD) of stained adherent bacteria
were determined with a microplate reader (model 680, Bio-rad) at
595 nm (OD595 nm). These OD values were considered as an index
of bacteria adhering to surface and forming biofilms. Experiment
was performed in triplicate, the data was then averaged and the
standard deviation was calculated.
Fig. 1. TEM image obtained from purified AgNPs synthesized using B. licheniformis.
3. Results Several fields were photographed and were used to determine the diameter of
nanoparticles. The range of observed diameter was 50 ± 5 nm.

3.1. Biological synthesis of AgNPs


Table 1
Silver nanoparticles were synthesized using B. licheniformis and Diameter of the zone of inhibition by silver nanoparticles against microbes respon-
sible for the disease pathogenesis. Results are mean ± SD (n = 4).
purified. The synthesized nanoparticles were primarily character-
ized by UV–vis spectroscopy, which has proved to be a very useful Microorganism Diameter of inhibition zones (in mm) (mean of
technique for the analysis of nanoparticles [19]. Further charac- four replicates)
terization was carried out using transmission electron microscopy. Staphylococcus epidermidis 12 ± 1.2 mm
Electron microscopic images show that purified nanoparticles are Pseudomonas aeruginosa 9.5 ± 0.9 mm
spherical with a mean diameter of 50 nm (Fig. 1).

3.2. Anti-microbial activity of AgNPs against P. aeruginosa and environmental factors [23]. Biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa and
S. epidermidis S. epidermidis were tested by growing the organism in Brain heart
infusion agar supplemented with Congo red (BHIC) with and with-
AgNPs are one of the successfully employed anti-microbial out silver nanoparticles. When the colonies were grown without
agents commercially. Here, the anti-microbial activity of AgNPs was AgNPs in the medium, the organisms appeared as dry crystalline
tested against P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis, using well-diffusion black colonies, indicating the production of exopolysachharides,
method (Fig. 2). The zone of inhibition is found to be slightly higher which is the prerequisite for the formation of biofilm (Fig. 3).
for S. epidermidis in comparison to its counterpart. The zone of Whereas when the organisms were grown on BHIC with AgNPs,
inhibition is given as a mean of four replicates of the diameter of the organisms did not survive. During the treatment with reduced
inhibition zones (in mm) around each well with AgNPs solution concentrations of AgNPs (10 nM), the organisms continued to grow,
(Table 1). but AgNPs treatment has inhibited the synthesis of exopolysach-
harides, indicated by the absence of dry crystalline black colonies
3.3. Detection of biofilm formation (Fig. 3). The presence of nanoparticles at a certain level inhibited
bacterial growth by more than 90%. When the exopolysachharide
Biofilm formation is detected in many organisms synthesizing synthesis is arrested, the organism cannot form biofilm. There-
exopolysachharides. The biofilm is made up of microorganisms fore, 50 nM of silver nanoparticles significantly arrested biofilm
adhering to the surface coated with slime – the exopolysaccha- formation without affecting viability, whereas 100 nM inhibited the
ride matrix which protects the microbes from the unfavorable growth of the organism itself.

Fig. 2. Anti-microbial activity of the purified silver nanoparticles against P. aeruginosa (A) and S. epidermidis (B) at 100 nM concentration.
K. Kalishwaralal et al. / Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 79 (2010) 340–344 343

Fig. 3. Ability of the organisms was checked for biofilm formation in brain heart infusion agar supplemented with Congo red. The appearance of black crystalline colonies
indicate the exopolysachharide production by P. aeruginosa (A) and S. epidermidis (C), whereas the addition of 50 nM silver nanoparticles blocked the exopolysachharide
synthesis by P. aeruginosa (B) and S. epidermidis (D).

3.4. Quantification of biofilm detachment

As biofilm formation is a prerequisite for Microbial keratitis,


the ability of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis, the major particip-
itants, in the microbial biofilm formation was investigated in vitro
by monitoring the binding of the dye crystal violet to adherent
cells which directly revealed their effective ability in formation of
biofilm [24]. Crystal violet staining, a spectrophotometrical method
was adopted to quantify biofilm density, a technique used for
quantification of biofilm [23]. A calibration curve was previously
plotted using various concentration of crystal violet to arrive at the
results.
P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis were grown to form biofilm
for 24 h in microtiter plate wells and then treated with varying
concentrations of silver nanoparticles (Fig. 4). Treatment for 2 h
with concentration of 100 nM of silver nanoparticles resulted in a
decrease of 95% and 98% of the biofilm formed and 50 nM resulted
in a 50% reduction in biofilm. These data demonstrate that silver
nanoparticles induced detachment of P. aeruginosa and S. epider-
midis biofilms was rapid, efficient and also occurred at clinically
achievable concentrations of silver nanoparticles.

4. Discussion

Contact lenses associated MK is a severe eye infection arising


from the presence of adhered microorganisms on the lens sur-
face. MK is common among patients suffering from ocular injury
[25], however other factors like continuous and overnight wear Fig. 4. The anti-biofilm ability checked by tissue culture plate method showing that
[25,26] contaminated lens care solutions and lens cases [27] are addition of increasing concentrations of silver nanoparticles reduced the ability of
also involved in the development of MK. P. aeruginosa and Staphylo- the organisms to form biofilm and attach to the surface of the wells. 100 nM silver
nanoparticles completely inhibited the exopolysachharide synthesis by both the
cocci sp. are the common causative pathogens of the MK. Therefore
orgamisms (silver nanoparticle treatment to the adhered (A) P. aeruginosa and (B)
the ability of the nanoparticles to inhibit the formation of the S. epidermidis on the wells).
biofilms and formed biofilms were checked against the aforesaid
organisms. The exopolysaccharides synthesized by the bacteria
344 K. Kalishwaralal et al. / Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 79 (2010) 340–344

not only protects the bacteria from the host defense mechanism 5. Conclusion
but also mediates the adhesion of the organism between the
lens and the corneal epithelium [28,29]. Moreover the ability of The present study characterizes the anti-biofilm activity of sil-
the organisms to form biofilm was confirmed by the formation ver nanoparticles against two common bacterial pathogens that
of dry crystalline colonies on BHIC. Here we checked the abil- are been proven for their efficient biofilm formation. It is notewor-
ity of the AgNPs to inhibit the growth of the organisms under thy that for prevention of Microbial keratitis, silver nanoparticles
consideration, by well-diffusion method of antibiotic assay. The composing gel may be used as a safe biocide for destroying differ-
organisms’ growth was effectively impeded by the silver nanopar- ent bacterial biofilms. Observations made through microtiter plate
ticles at the concentration of 100 nM. The concentration of silver assay (0.1% crystal violet staining) discloses the potential of sil-
nanoparticles was lesser than the previous reports for the toxic ver nanoparticles in effective inhibition of biofilm formation which
concentration of the AgNPs in vitro against the mammalian retinal affirms the futuristic applications of AgNP based contact lens care
cells [18]. solutions, for biofilm based human ocular problems, thereby serv-
The recurrence of biofilms in spite of treatment with various ing mankind through an economic therapeutic alternative.
anti-microbial agents was attributed to the impedance created by
the biofilm matrix [30]. Although water channels are present in Acknowledgements
the biofilms, the deep lying organisms escape the treatment as the
matrix hinders the diffusion of the drug. Therefore, inhibition of The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Pushpa Viswanathan,
biofilm formation is very much essential in the case of prevention Professor, Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India, for her immense
of MK and various other disorders, as the exopolysachharide slime support in analyzing samples under Transmission Electron Micro-
formed reduces the susceptibility of the organism to the adminis- scope. The author Kalishwaralal Kalimuthu is grateful to CSIR for
tered drug. Antibiotic treatments effectively kill the bacteria which providing senior research fellowship (Ack. No. 142070/2K9/1).
remain individual, but the efficiency is very much reduced when
the organism forms slime. This makes the organisms to revert the
References
disease when the antibiotic treatment is finished because of the
healing of symptoms. This is the reason behind the biofilm infec- [1] J.P. Whitcher, M. Srinivasan, M.P. Upadhya, Bull. World Health Organ. 79 (2001)
tions showing recurring symptoms even after cycles of antibiotic 214–221.
therapy until the mass is surgically removed. Therefore in this [2] L. Kodjikian, E. Casoli-Bergeron, F. Malet, Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 246
(2008) 267–273.
report we investigated whether AgNPs has anti-microbial activity [3] E.N. Martins, M.E. Farah, L.S. Alvarenga, M.C. Yu, A.L. Höflin-Lima, CLAO J. 28
and also anti-biofilm function by using BHIC. Here, AgNPs not only (2002) 146–148.
inhibited the growth but also the ability of the organism to syn- [4] Y.N. Dang, A. Rao, P.R. Kastl, R.C. Blake, M.J. Schurr, D.A. Blake, Eye Contact Lens
29 (2003) 65–68.
thesize the exopolysachharide. This is evident from Fig. 3 where [5] V. Butcko, T.T. McMahon, C.E. Joslin, L. Jones, Eye Contact Lens 33 (2007)
the BHI agar containing Congo red is supplemented with reduced 421–425.
the concentration of AgNPs (50 nM). The concentration was cho- [6] M. Henriques, C. Sousa, M. Lira, Optom. Vis. Sci. 82 (2005) 446–450.
[7] J.W. Costerton, L. Montanaro, C.R. Arciola, Int. J. Artif. Organs 28 (2005)
sen based on the non-inhibitory concentration values which only 1062–1068.
impeded the synthesis of the exopolysachharides but not the via- [8] N. Hoiby, H. Krogh Johansen, C. Moser, Z. Song, O. Ciofu, A. Kharazmi, Microbes
bility of the organism (data not shown). The organism continued Infect. 3 (2001) 23–35.
[9] K.K. Jefferson, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 236 (2004) 163–173.
to grow, but its ability to synthesize the exopolysachharide is
[10] L. McLaughlin-Borlace, F. Stapleton, M. Matheson, J.K. Dart, J. Appl. Microbiol.
blocked. This shows that silver nanoparticles have the ability to 84 (1998) 827–838.
block the exopolysachharide synthesis of the organism otherwise [11] H.J. Klasen, Burns 26 (2000) 117–130.
the biofilm. Another method which was found to be useful in deter- [12] B.S. Atiyeh, M. Costagliola, S.N. Hayek, S.A. Dibo, Burns 33 (2007) 139–148.
[13] L. Sintubin, W.D. Windt, J. Dick, J. Mast, D. Vander Ha, W. Verstraete, N. Boon,
mining the ability of the moiety to disrupt the biofilm formation Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 84 (4) (2009) 741–749.
is the crystal violet method on TCP. The TCP assay described by [14] K.J. Kim, W.S. Sung, B.K. Suh, S.K. Moon, J.S. Choi, J.G. Kim, D.G. Lee, Biometals
Christensen et al. [23] is most widely used and was considered 22 (2009) 235–242.
[15] P.L. Nadworny, J. Wang, E.E. Tredget, R.E. Burrell, Nanomedicine 4 (2008)
as standard test for detection of biofilm formation. The ability of 241–251.
the organism to form biofilm and the effect of various concen- [16] J.V. Rogers Parkinson, Y.W. Choi, J.L. Speshock, S.M. Hussain, Nanoscale Res.
trations of silver nanoparticles in inhibiting the formation was Lett. 3 (2008) 129–133.
[17] S. Gurunathan, K.J. Lee, K. Kalishwaralal, S. Sheikpranbabu, R. Vaidyanathan,
checked on a 96-well plate, where an increase of silver nanopar- S.H. Eom, Biomaterials 30 (2009) 6341–6350.
ticles concentration negatively regulated the biofilm formation. [18] K. Kalishwaralal, E. Banumathi, S.R.K. Pandian, V. Deepak, J. Muniyandi, S.H.
This is evident from Fig. 4 where 100 nM of silver nanoparticles Eom, Colloid Surf. B: Biointerfaces 73 (2009) 51–57.
[19] K. Kalimuthu, R.S. Babu, D. Venkataraman, M. Bilal, S. Gurunathan, Colloid Surf.
treatment almost completely inhibited the formation of biofilm B: Biointerfaces 65 (2008) 150–153.
(>95%). [20] X. Liu, M. Atwater, Q. Wang, J. Huo, Colloid Surf. B: Biointerfaces 58 (2007) 3–7.
Therefore the results obtained directly reveals that biologically [21] A. Nanda, M. Saravanan, Nanomedicine 5 (2009) 452–456.
[22] D.J. Freeman, F.R. Falkiner, C.T. Keane, J. Clin. Pathol. 42 (1989) 872–874.
synthesized silver nanoparticles at a concentration of 100 nM not
[23] G.D. Christensen, W.A. Simpson, J.A. Younger, L.M. Baddour, F.F. Barrett, D.M.
only effectively inhibited the growth of the bacteria, but also wiped Melton, J. Clin. Microbiol. 22 (1985) 996–1006.
out the biofilm formed by it. This inhibitory effect of AgNPs on [24] H.M. Judith, E.K. Daniel, A.O. George, Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. (2005),
the existing biofilm may due to be presence of water channels 1B.1.1–1B.1.17.
[25] K.H. Cheng, S.L. Leung, H.W. Hoekman, W.H. Beekhuis, P.G. Mulder, A.J. Geer-
though out the biofilm. Since in all biofilms water channels (pores) ards, Lancet 354 (1999) 181–185.
are present for nutrient transportation, AgNPs may directly diffuse [26] B.A. Weissman, B.J. Mondino, Contact Lens Anterior Eye 25 (2002) 3–9.
through the exopolysaccharide layer through the pores and may [27] S.M.J. Fleiszig, D.J. Evans, Clin. Exp. Optom. 85 (2002) 271–278.
[28] A.S. Hoffman, D. Schoen Mack, P. Becker, I. Chattergee, S. Dobinsky, J.K.M.
impart anti-microbial function. The experiment with 96-well plate Knobloch, G. Peters, Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 294 (2004) 203–212.
shows that AgNPs eliminate the biofilm formed previously besides [29] N. Nayak, T.C. Nag, G. Satpathy, S.B. Ray, Indian J. Med. Res. 125 (2007) 767–771.
inhibiting the formation of biofilm in existing bacteria. [30] A. Mohammed, L. Al-Fattani, J. Med. Microbiol. 55 (2006) 999–1008.

You might also like