Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Second Lecture
.Polyglot: is the one who speaks many languages. He can not analyze it
Most linguists should know more than one language. So, he can
.investigate
The Linguist can be a polyglot but the polyglot can not be a linguist
because he knows how to use the language but not to investigate the
.language
:Theory of Grammar
It is called Competence. It is the linguistic knowledge that the speaker
has in his mind about his language.( Competence is something already in
(the mind
1
Applied Linguistics: it is interested in language planning , literacy
.bilingualism and second language acquisition
-1
subfields) )تعداد الـ
.it is used to refer to the 2nd language acquisition -2
2
For example, when one says
()انظر إلى الباب
or says (look at the door), the listener will look at the door. It means that
all languages have sth is called door and it is mental or part of our
linguistic knowledge(competence) which is a human characteristic which
is the brain. In other words, all languages have the same referent or object
.which is this symbol (door) over there
Also, the concept of some words symbolizes certain ideas in our brain
like when someone says
-love حب
We will smile , but we someone says
كرهHate
We will frown
All of us have a brain. Inside the brain , we have the tool that **
. differentiate a language from other languages
:History of Linguistics
The interest in the nature of human language appears to have arisen
.when the human species evolved in the history
BCE The Egyptian surgeons were concerned with clinical 1700*
questions. They only emphasized the practical side. They had made some
operations in the brains of some patients who can not use the language
.correctly
Like the stoke which makes a person loses a part of using or
.understanding the language
Then, Aristotle and Plato talked about the language from philosophic *
.and rhetorical points of view. They made some issues of linguistics
Roman and Greek talked about grammar and discussed the sounds of *
the language and the structures of words and sentences. This interest
continued through the medieval period and the renaissance in an
.unbroken thread to the present period
Panini was the first one who did some descriptions of the language so *
close to the description of the language these days because he did it in
.details. He studied the Sanskrit Language
19th century the major efforts of the linguists of the nineteenth *
century were devoted to a. historical
.b. and comparative studies
:Ferdinand de Saussure ***
.He is Swiss linguist -1
He focuses on paying attention to the structural -2
.principles
He has an influence on the 20th century. All American -3
and European linguists followed the descriptive. Linguists turned to
3
descriptive synchronic studies of the language and to the development of
.empirical methods for their analysis
.He makes differences between many terms -4
He has no books but his students collect his lectures -5
.and put them together in a book
He makes a distinction between historical and-6
descriptive linguistics
Historical Linguistics = Diachronic
Descriptive Linguistics = Synchronic Studying a group in a
.given time
Synchronic: is investigate the way people speak in a given speech **
community at a given time. So, we can say "the language in that time
"..…is
Diachronic: the study of the developments of the languages through **
.time
:European American
Edward
.He is concerned with the culture of language is society
( anthropology )