Seismic Isolation Report For Triple Pendulum Isolators

Seismic Isolation Engineered Solution for Başakşehir Health Campus
This Seismic Isolation Engineering Report details the engineered isolation solution provided by
Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. (EPS) for the Başakşehir Health Campus in Istanbul, Turkey. The
10 million square feet Başakşehir Health Campus in Turkey is a premium health care facility
constructed to maintain post-earthquake functionality after a design level earthquake.
The 2068 Triple Pendulum seismic isolators for the Başakşehir Health Campus were designed and
manufactured by EPS to comply with the Category IV resiliency criteria specified in the Seismic
Isolation Standard for Continued Functionality, “SISCF”. The structure strength and stiffness, and
isolator installation details, were designed and specified by ARUP to comply with the Category IV
resiliency criteria specified in the Seismic Isolation Standard for Continued Functionality.
Implementing these resiliency criteria, it is anticipated that seismic shaking damage to the architectural
components and structure of Başakşehir Health Campus would be limited to 2% of replacement costs,
on occurrence of the design basis earthquake shaking, consistent with the REDi Platinum seismic loss
limit.
The Başakşehir Health Campus employs a concrete shear wall structure supported on 5 second period
Triple Pendulum isolators. The isolators have 3 levels of increasing friction that are staged to achieve
smooth transitions between the 3 pendulum mechanisms, such that the median floor spectra
accelerations are less than 0.4g, and the maximum story drifts are less than 0.3%.
With median floor spectra accelerations limited to 0.4g, and maximum story drifts limited to 0.3%, the
architectural and non-structural components of buildings are reasonably protected from seismic shaking
damage. The functionality of these components can be reasonably preserved, compliant with the 2%
target damage limit specified herein, using the standard anchorage and strength details for non-
structural components that are specified in ASCE 7-16 Chapter 13, but with the horizontal seismic
design force Fp taken as a fixed value of 0.4 Wp, for all non-structural components throughout the
structure, in accordance with the resiliency criteria in the SISCF.
Standard practice in structural engineering is to specify the minimum size structural components that
have adequate strength and stiffness, according to the limits specified in the material standards, to resist
the ASCE 7 design loads. The SISCF material standard for seismic isolators, combined with the ASCE
7 specified isolator design loads and displacements, results in isolator capacities safe from collapse, and
isolator properties that limit seismic damage to 2%, 4% or 8% of replacement costs. For ASCE 7
compliant isolated structures, the FEMA P58 calculated seismic damage varies from 0% to 100%,
depending on the isolator and structure properties [Terzic, Zayas 2016]. Isolators with 5 second natural
periods and 10% damping, will typically limit damage to 2% for the strongest design earthquake
shaking. Isolators having 2 second periods, 30% damping, and 1/3 the displacement capacity, will
typically limit damage to 30% for the same design earthquake shaking (Table C.3-1).
ASCE 7-16 Chapter 1 requirements for “Functionality” specify that “Category IV structures have a
reasonable probability to have adequate structural strength and stiffness that would not prevent function
of the facility immediately following the design level earthquake”. To satisfy this Functionality
requirement this standard specifies using R=1 for the design earthquake, and limits structure story drifts
to 0.3%, and limits median floor spectra accelerations to 0.4g. FEMA P58 damage calculations indicate
that these resiliency criteria limit building damage to less than 2% of the replacement costs, consistent
Page 2 of 123
with the REDi Platinum seismic loss limit. For structures that comply with these resiliency criteria, most
architectural components of most facilities will retain their ability to function after a design level
earthquake. Moment frame structures designed with the ASCE 7 Importance and R factors, avoid
collapse, but the FEMA P58 calculated seismic losses range from 15% to 150% [Terzic] (Fig C.3-1),
which does not satisfy ASCE 7 Functionality or REDi Resiliency.
ASCE 7 Table 1.3-2 specifies requirements for “Target Reliability”. The “Probability of Failure for loss
of Structural Stability” for primary structural components in essential facilities must be less than 2.5%.
FEMA P695 collapse risk calculations for isolated structures were performed at the University of
California at Berkeley [Shao], and the State University of New York at Buffalo [Kitayama]. These
studies conclude that isolators need displacement capacities of 1.5 to 2.5 times the ASCE 7 calculated
MCER demand, as specified in the SISCF, to satisfy the minimum ASCE 7 Target Reliabilities.
ASCE 7-16 Chapter 1 requires that a material standard be specified for the seismic isolators, which
specifies the isolator capacity limits for the MCER shear and displacement, and factors of safety, such
that the isolated structure satisfies the ASCE 7 Target Reliability and Functionality requirements. The
SISCF determines isolator compliance through performance tests that apply to any type of isolator.
For isolated structures that comply with the SISCF standard, any of the 84 Seismic Force-Resisting
System specified in ASCE 7 Table 12.2-1 may be used for structures located in any Seismic Design
Category, at any structure height. Traditional structure types that have proven to be reliable and
economic for non-seismic regions, combined with isolators that comply with this standard, will often
result in lower total structure costs as compared to non-isolated ductile structure types. The most
economic isolated structures have combined ordinary concrete shear walls, or ordinary concentric steel
braces, with isolators qualified under the SISCF. Stiff upper structures on flexible isolators satisfy the
target damage limits, and typically cost less to build as compared to special moment frame structures.
Every year people die when hospitals are unable to treat the thousands of people injured by earthquakes.
The World Health Organization has issued directives that new hospitals must be constructed with a level
of protection that best guarantees its capacity to continue functioning at its maximum capacity after
earthquakes. Ministries of health in 194 countries, including the USA, Turkey, Peru, Japan, Europe, and
South America, have adopted these directives.
In Turkey, during the past 18 years earthquakes have killed 20,000 people, and 10,000 of these lives
could have been saved if the hospitals had remained functional. Hospitals that cannot function must be
evacuated on the day of the earthquake, and cannot provide emergency medical care for the many injured
persons. Hospital post-earthquake functionality according to the SISCF has proven to be a simple to
implement means of achieving the Functionality required by ASCE 7-16 Section 1.3.3. Structures
designed for minimum ASCE 7 compliance, without the SISCF standard, typically lose functionality
after a design level earthquake event. The ASCE 7 Importance Factor of 1.5 reduces structural damage,
but does not limit architectural damage sufficiently to maintain post-earthquake functionality.
Compliance with the SISCF resiliency criteria for Category IV structures achieves “adequate structural
strength and stiffness that would not prevent function of the facility immediately following the design
level earthquake”.

Page 3 of 123
Isolation Solution Performance Summary
This Seismic Isolation Engineering Report quantifies the resilience of the Başakşehir Health Campus
engineered isolation solution in accordance with the “Seismic Isolation Standard for Continued
Functionality”.
The following performance metrics were determined using stick model dynamic time history analysis
presented in the “Dynamic Analysis” section of this report and repair cost estimates presented in the
“Damage Estimation” section. These metrics assume an elastic superstructure (R=1) and a minimum
stiffness for each of the structures towers as described in the “Minimum Story Stiffnesses” section.
DBE Peak Isolator Displacement (Dd) 8.1” (206 mm)

DBE Peak Base Shear (Vd) 0.08 W
MCE Peak Isolator Displacement (Dm) 17.0” (432 mm)

MCE Peak Base Shear (Vm) 0.11 W
DBE Average 0-3s Median Sa 0.40g

DBE Average Drift 0.11%
DBE Max Drift 0.21%
DBE Expected Damage to Architectural and 1.8%

Structural Components (% Construction Cost)
Page 4 of 123
Continued Functionality Isolation Displacement Capacity Criteria
ASCE 7 Chapter 11 specifies the median seismic spectra for the maximum considered earthquake
“MCER”. Maintaining isolator stability consistent with the ASCE 7 Target Reliability for Structure
Stability requires accommodating the statistical variations in the MCER seismic loading. FEMA P695
collapse risk studies for isolated structures were performed at the University of California at Berkeley,
and the State University of New York at Buffalo. These conclude that larger isolator displacement
capacities as specified by the “Seismic Isolation Standard for Continued Functionality” are necessary
to satisfy the ASCE 7 Target Reliability.
The isolator displacement demands for the Başakşehir Health Campus are calculated in the “Dynamic
Analysis” section of this report as well as in the more conservative simplified “Static Calculations”
section. The displacement capacities of the 5 different isolator types can be found in the “Bearing
Drawings and Specifications” section and are supported with prototype testing.
Continued Functionality Standard (12.0) Capacity Factors for Isolator Displacement
Sa (4 sec) Capacity Factor

< 0.1 g 1.75
0.1 g 1.5
0.2 g 1.25
0.3 g 1.1
Project Capacity Factor for Isolator Displacement
Sa (4 sec) Capacity Factor

0.2 g 1.25
Displacement Demand
Dm Equiv. Lateral Force Procedure 18.8 "

Dm Time Histories 17 "
Governing Dm 18.8 "

Capacity Factor x Governing Dm 23.5 "
Isolator Displacement Capactities
Isolator Dmc Dtmc

FPT15656/32-32/22-11 25 " 34 "
FPT15651/26-20R/19-12 25.5 " 31.8 "
FPT15646/22-20/16-8 25.1 " 31 "
FPT15641/16-12R/12-7 25.5 " 30.4 "
FPT15636/10-8R/8-5 26.3 " 30.8 "
Page 5 of 123
Continued Functionality Design Procedure
Static Calculations – Isolator Displacements and Shear
This static calculation is intended as a first order calculation of the isolator displacements and base
shears based on the isolator properties and design spectra. The weighted average of the isolator
properties are used as well as an initial guess of the 1st mode period of the super-structure. The first
mode period corresponding to the masses and structural stiffnesses in “BSK - Structural Modal
Information Nov 16 2016” provided to EPS was used for this purpose. The upper bound frictions used
for the static calculation and the rest of the continued functionality design procedure are based on the
weighted average of the average quality control test results.
Minimum Story Stiffnesses

In order to meet the Category IV SISCF peak drift ratio criterion, the superstructure stiffness must be
limited in order to control floor displacements. A method for determining this limit is presented in the
“Minimum Story Stiffnesses” section for one tower. Dynamic Analysis is required to confirm the
result and check that acceleration criteria are met. The stiffnesses in “BSK - Structural Modal
Information Nov 16 2016” meet this minimum and are used for the analyses that follow.
Dynamic Analysis
A stick model was created in order to study the behavior of the isolated structure. As it is assumed that
the building is designed to remain elastic (R=1), Linear link elements were used for each story above
the isolation plane and the built-in SAP Triple Pendulum Isolator Element was used to model the
behavior of the bearing. 7 spectrally matched ground motion histories were used along with their 90
degree rotation for each of the 2475 year MCE hazard and the 475 year DBE hazard levels. The average
results of these motions are summarized in Table B and Table C. Detailed results used in determining
the metrics presented in the Isolation Solution Performance Summary are listed in tables D through G.
The dynamic analysis was repeated for a possible fixed base design for comparison. ASCE 7-16
Provisions for Linear Response History Analysis (12.9.2) as well as the allowable drift limits (12.12-
1) were used to determine the story elastic stiffnesses. Multilinear Plastic link elements with these
elastic stiffnesses, yield strengths equal to twice the demand calculated in accordance with 12.9.2, and
a strain hardening ratio of 0.02 were then used to model each story. Results can be found in Tables I
through N.
Seismic Design Forces

Based on the dynamic analysis results, two design force distributions are presented for the isolated
superstructure:
1) Shear Force - This distribution is intended for the shear design of the superstructure. The
distribution is based on the peak story shear at each level, averaged across all time history cases.
The shear forces are then used to determine story forces that will result in this average maximum
shear distribution. This method results in higher shears than the procedure outlined in ASCE 7-16
17.5.5, where using the peak forces rather than the peak shears is permissible.
Page 6 of 123
2) Overturning - This distribution is intended for the design of the foundation and the rigidity of the
lower floor levels to control overturning. The maximum overturning force for each time history case is
first found. The force distribution for the time history case corresponding to, or closest to the median
value of the cases is then chosen. Finally, this distribution is scaled such that resulting overturning
moment matches the average value across all time history cases.
Damage Estimation
In developing the Continued Functionality Standard, a representative FEMA P58 Model was created in
order to estimate the repair costs associated with architectural and structural components. The
Normative Quantity Estimation Tool was used for the selection of component fragilities and quantities
as per hospital occupancy. The MEP located at the roof level is assumed to be sufficiently seismically
protected for all structure types. Using information drawn from this model as well as reported damage
from actual earthquake events, relationships between earthquake demand parameters and median
expected damage as a percentage of construction cost were developed. These relationships are
presented in the “Damage Estimation” Section as well as the damage estimates they yield for the
isolated and fixed base designs.
Page 7 of 123
Bearing Drawings and Specifications
FPT15656/32-32/22-11
FPT15651/26-20R/19-12
FPT15646/22-20/16-8
FPT15641/16-12R/12-7
FPT15636/10-8R/8-5
.
Page 8 of 123
Page 9 of 123
FPT15656/32-32/22-11 BEARING SPECIFICATIONS June 20, 2017
Bearing Capacities and Design Requirements

Lateral Displacement Capacities (min.): Dtmc= +34 in. (863 mm); Dmc = +25.0 in (635mm).
Vertical Load Capacities (min.): Elastic 15000 kips (66964 kn) min; Ultimate 22700 kips (101339 kn) min.
Shear Load Capacities (min.): Elastic shear load capacity not less than 360 kips (1607 kn), simultaneous
with a vertical load not less than 3000 kips (13920 kn); at lateral displacements not less than +25.0 in (635
mm). Ultimate shear load capacity not less than 470 kips (2098 kn), simultaneous with a vertical load not
less than 3000 kips (13920 kn).
Rotation Capacity: Under an imposed 2+ degree angular rotation of the top bearing surface relative to the
bottom surface, about any Cartesian axis of rotation, the bearing must elastically support the combined listed
Elastic Vertical and Elastic Shear Load Capacities.
When the bearing is supported on 7250 psi (50 Mpa) confined concrete, the permissible vertical structure
loads on the bearings according to ACI 318-08 Section 10.14 are: Pu=(1.2D+1.6RL) = 9900 kips (44196
kn); Pu=(1.0D+0.5RL+E) = 13800kips (61607 kn) at 22” (559 mm) displacement. Buyer is responsible to
ensure that the application’s demands are within the bearing capacities; and for the adequacy of the structure,
connections, seismic loadings, seismic movement gaps; and for compliance with all construction document,
design, and code requirements, as applicable to the use of the bearings.
Materials: The bearing liner materials on the sliders shall be a non-metallic, self-sacrificing liner type, and
provide the properties as specified herein. The bearing liner shall provide satisfactory performance for
energy dissipation rate, heat resistance, and properties during all bearing tests herein, and meet the
acceptance criteria as specified. The bearing liner material shall have a compressive strength capacity of at
least 80 ksi. The material of the concave plates and slider components shall be ASTM A536, A576, A572,
A108 or A36. The concave spherical surfaces of the concave plates shall be ASTM A240, Grade 304
stainless steel. The seals shall be an ethylene propylene (EPDM) material. Exposed metal surfaces of the
bearing shall be blasted to SSPC/SP-6, and painted with zinc rich primer and urethane finish coat, minimum
5 mils DFT (excludes top and bottom bearing surfaces).
Manufacture: The bearing design, capacities, properties, materials, manufacture, and testing and quality
control shall be in conformance with this specification and the International Standards Organization
ISO9001:2008 Quality Control Program requirements for the “Design and Manufacture of Seismic Isolation
Bearings” as approved under a current Certificate of Registration issued by the Orion Registrar. The EPS
drawings and specifications are the only drawings, specifications, and requirements that apply to the
manufacture, testing, and supply of EPS bearings. Construction document drawings and specifications do
not apply to the materials, manufacture, or testing of EPS bearings.
Properties and Quality Control Testing: Real Time Quality Control tests will be performed on 100% of
production and prototype bearings in accordance with the Quality Control Tests as specified below and in
the ISO9001:2008 Quality Control Program. The friction values obtained from the cyclic test of each
individual bearing shall be within the specified individual bearing values. The average friction value
obtained from the cyclic tests of all bearings shall be within the specified average bearing values. Report the
effective stiffness and damping for the average of the 3 cycles.
Average Bearing Individual Bearing
Values Values
QC 3000 Test Specification (%) (%)
Complete 3 cycles at + 12 (305 mm), minimum f1 min. = 2.0 f1 max.= 5.0 f1 min. = 1.5 f1 max.= 6.0
lateral cyclic displacements in 15 seconds max. f2 min. = 4.5 f2 max. = 6.5 f2 min. = 4.0 f2 max. = 7.0
Maintain an average vertical load of 3000 kips f3 min. = 5.5 f3 max. = 7.5 f3 min. = 5.0 f3 max. = 8.0
(13920 kn) (+ 10%) ~Avg. (D+0.3Lr)
Page 10 of 123
Page 11 of 123
FPT15651/26-20R/19-12 BEARING SPECIFICATIONS June 20, 2017

Lateral Displacement Capacities (min.): Dtmc= +31.8 in. (807 mm); Dmc = +25.5 in (648 mm).
Values Values
(11607 kn) (+ 10%) ~Avg. (D+0.3Lr)
Page 12 of 123
Page 13 of 123
FPT15646/22-20/16-8 BEARING SPECIFICATIONS June 20, 2017

Lateral Displacement Capacities (min.): Dtmc= +31 in. (787 mm); Dmc = +25.1 in (637mm).
kn); Pu=(1.0D+0.5RL+E) = 7300 kips (32789 kn) at 22” (559 mm) displacement. Buyer is responsible to
Values Values
(10714 kn) (+ 10%) ~Avg. (D+0.3Lr)
Page 14 of 123
Page 15 of 123

Shear Load Capacities (min.): Elastic shear load capacity not less than 170 kips (759 kn), simultaneous with
a vertical load not less than 1400 kips (6250 kn); at lateral displacements not less than +25.5 in (655 mm).
Ultimate shear load capacity not less than 221 kips (987 kn), simultaneous with a vertical load not less than
1400 kips (6250 kn).
Values Values
(6250 kn) (+ 10%) ~Avg. (D+0.3Lr)
Page 16 of 123
Page 17 of 123

Shear Load Capacities (min.): Elastic shear load capacity not less than 64 kips (285 kn), simultaneous with a
vertical load not less than 550 kips (2455 kn); at lateral displacements not less than +26.3 in (668 mm).
Ultimate shear load capacity not less than 83 kips (371 kn), simultaneous with a vertical load not less than
550 kips (2455 kn).
loads on the bearings according to ACI 318-08 Section 10.14 are: Pu=(1.2D+1.6RL) = 1150 kips (5134 kn);
Pu=(1.0D+0.5RL+E) = 1800kips (8036 kn) at 22” (559 mm) displacement. Buyer is responsible to ensure
that the application’s demands are within the bearing capacities; and for the adequacy of the structure,
Values Values
(2455 kn) (+ 10%) ~Avg. (D+0.3Lr)
Page 18 of 123
Static Calculations
Isolator Displacement and Shear
Page 19 of 123
STATIC CALCULATIONS
Average Bearing:
Frictions f1 f2 f3 Pendulum Lengths

Upper bound 0.007 0.045 0.055 L1 28.0 in.
L2 164.0 in.
L3 0.0 in.
Comparison of Table 17.5-1 to Eq. Bd = (Damping/0.05)^0.3
DBE Response
Assume Dd = 9.6 in Lower Bound Table 17.5-1 Damping Coefficient, Bd and Bm
Ti (eff Isolator)= 3.55 sec
Ts (structure 1st mode) 1.12 sec Effective Bd or Bm (Dam/0.05)^0.3
Teff/Ti 1.049 [(Ti^-2+Ts^-2)/(Ts^-2)]^.5 Damping
Teff 3.72 sec 2% 0.80 0.76
Fd 0.078 W AASHTO Equation 5% 1.00 1.00
Damping 33% Bd = 1.76 Bd = (Damping/0.05)^0.3 10% 1.20 1.23
Similar to Table 17.5-1 20% 1.50 1.52
DBE Design Spectra Response ASCE 7-10 30% 1.70 1.71
Teff 3.72 sec. 40% 1.90 1.87
Sa 0.137 g 50% 2.00 2.00
Vd = Sa/Bd = 0.078 W < = Fd = 0.078 W OK
MCE Response
Assume Dm = 20.9 in Lower Bound

Teff 4.30
Ts (structure 1st mode) 1.12 sec
Teff/Ti 1.033 [(Ti^-2+Ts^-2)/(Ts^-2)]^.5
Teff 4.44 sec
Fm 0.116 W AASHTO Equation
Damping 24% Bm = 1.60 Bm = (Damping/0.05)^0.3
Similar to Table 17.5-1
MCE Design Spectra Response ASCE 7-10
Teff 4.44 sec.
Sa 0.185 g
Vm = Sa/Bm = 0.115 W ~ Fm = 0.116 W OK
Dtm(Static) = 1.15*Dm = 24.035 in.

With Non-Linear Time History Analysis Dtm can be less than Dtm(Static) ASCE 7-16 Section 17.6
But Dtm > 0.80*Dtm(Static): Assume Dtm ~ 0.90*Dtm(Static) = 21.6 in.
Dtm ~ 21.6 in.
Dm ~ Dtm/1.15 ~ 18.8 in.
Page 20 of 123
STATIC CALCULATIONS
Average Bearing:

Upper bound 0.007 0.045 0.055 L1 711 mm
L2 4166 mm
L3 0 mm
DBE Response
Assume Dd = 244 mm Lower Bound Table 17.5-1 Damping Coefficient, Bd and Bm
Teff 3.72 sec 0.02 0.80 0.76
Fd 0.078 W AASHTO Equation 0.05 1.00 1.00
Damping 33% Bd = 1.76 Bd = (Damping/0.05)^0.3 0.1 1.20 1.23
Similar to Table 17.5-1 0.2 1.50 1.52
DBE Design Spectra Response ASCE 7-10 0.3 1.70 1.71
Teff 3.72 sec. 0.4 1.90 1.87
Sa 0.137 g 0.5 2.00 2.00
Vd = Sa/Bd = 0.078 W < = Fd = 0.078 W OK
MCE Response
Assume Dm = 531 mm Lower Bound

Teff 4.30
Teff/Ti 1.033 [(Ti^-2+Ts^-2)/(Ts^-2)]^.5
Teff 4.44 sec
Teff 4.44 sec.
Sa 0.185 g
Vm = Sa/Bm = 0.115 W ~ Fm = 0.116 W OK
Dtm(Static) = 1.15*Dm = 610 mm

But Dtm > 0.80*Dtm(Static): Assume Dtm ~ 0.90*Dtm(Static) = 549 mm
Dtm ~ 549 mm
Dm ~ Dtm/1.15 ~ 478 mm
Page 21 of 123
0.15
0.1
0.05
Lateral/Vertical
0
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT (INCHES)
Properties f1 f2 f3 L1 (in.) L2 (in.) L3 (in.) D (in.) Shear(W) Teff (sec.) Damping Keff(k/in./k) EDC(W)
Lower Bound DBE 0.007 0.045 0.055 28.0 164.0 300.0 9.6 0.078 3.55 0.330 0.00812 1.551
Lower Bound MCE 0.007 0.045 0.055 28.0 164.0 300.0 20.9 0.116 4.30 0.239 0.00553 3.630
Page 22 of 123
0.15
0.1
0.05
Lateral/Vertical
0
-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT (mm)
Properties f1 f2 f3 L1 (mm.) L2 (mm.) L3 (mm.) D (mm.) Shear(W) Teff (sec.) Damping Keff(kn/mm/kn) EDC(W)
Lower Bound DBE 0.007 0.045 0.055 711 4166 7620 244 0.078 3.55 0.330 0.000320 39.4
Lower Bound MCE 0.007 0.045 0.055 711 4166 7620 531 0.116 4.30 0.239 0.000218 92.2
Page 23 of 123
STATIC CALCULATIONS
Average Bearing:

Upper bound 0.012 0.049 0.060 L1 28.0 in.
L2 164.0 in.
L3 0.0 in.
DBE Response
Assume Dd = 8.9 in Upper Bound Table 17.5-1 Damping Coefficient, Bd and Bm
Teff 3.55 sec 2% 0.80 0.76
Fd 0.080 W AASHTO Equation 5% 1.00 1.00
Damping 35% Bd = 1.80 Bd = (Damping/0.05)^0.3 10% 1.20 1.23
Similar to Table 17.5-1 20% 1.50 1.52
DBE Design Spectra Response ASCE 7-10 30% 1.70 1.71
Teff 3.55 sec. 40% 1.90 1.87
Sa 0.144 g 50% 2.00 2.00
Vd = Sa/Bd = 0.080 W < = Fd = 0.080 W OK
MCE Response
Assume Dm = 19.6 in Upper Bound

Teff 4.16
Teff/Ti 1.036 [(Ti^-2+Ts^-2)/(Ts^-2)]^.5
Teff 4.30 sec
Teff 4.30 sec.
Sa 0.191 g
Vm = Sa/Bm = 0.116 W ~ Fm = 0.116 W OK
Dtm(Static) = 1.15*Dm = 22.54 in.

But Dtm > 0.80*Dtm(Static): Assume Dtm ~ 0.90*Dtm(Static) = 20.3 in.
Dtm ~ 20.3 in.
Dm ~ Dtm/1.15 ~ 17.6 in.
Page 24 of 123
STATIC CALCULATIONS
Average Bearing:

Upper bound 0.012 0.049 0.060 L1 711 mm
L2 4166 mm
L3 0 mm
DBE Response
Assume Dd = 226 mm Upper Bound Table 17.5-1 Damping Coefficient, Bd and Bm
Teff 3.55 sec 0.02 0.80 0.76
Fd 0.080 W AASHTO Equation 0.05 1.00 1.00
Damping 35% Bd = 1.80 Bd = (Damping/0.05)^0.3 0.1 1.20 1.23
Similar to Table 17.5-1 0.2 1.50 1.52
DBE Design Spectra Response ASCE 7-10 0.3 1.70 1.71
Teff 3.55 sec. 0.4 1.90 1.87
Sa 0.144 g 0.5 2.00 2.00
Vd = Sa/Bd = 0.080 W < = Fd = 0.080 W OK
MCE Response
Assume Dm = 498 mm Upper Bound

Teff 4.16
Teff/Ti 1.036 [(Ti^-2+Ts^-2)/(Ts^-2)]^.5
Teff 4.30 sec
Teff 4.30 sec.
Sa 0.191 g
Vm = Sa/Bm = 0.116 W ~ Fm = 0.116 W OK
Dtm(Static) = 1.15*Dm = 573 mm

But Dtm > 0.80*Dtm(Static): Assume Dtm ~ 0.90*Dtm(Static) = 515 mm
Dtm ~ 515 mm
Dm ~ Dtm/1.15 ~ 448 mm
Page 25 of 123
0.15
0.1
0.05
Lateral/Vertical
0
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT (INCHES)
Properties f1 f2 f3 L1 (in.) L2 (in.) L3 (in.) D (in.) Shear(W) Teff (sec.) Damping Keff(k/in./k) EDC(W)
Upper Bound DBE 0.012 0.049 0.060 28.0 164.0 300.0 8.9 0.080 3.36 0.354 0.00903 1.589
Upper Bound MCE 0.012 0.049 0.060 28.0 164.0 300.0 19.6 0.116 4.16 0.263 0.00592 3.757
Page 26 of 123
0.15
0.1
0.05
Lateral/Vertical
0
-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENT (mm)
Properties f1 f2 f3 L1 (mm.) L2 (mm.) L3 (mm.) D (mm.) Shear(W) Teff (sec.) Damping Keff(kn/mm/kn) EDC(W)
Upper Bound DBE 0.0124 0.049 0.0602 711 4166 7620 226 0.080 3.36 0.354 0.000355 40.4
Upper Bound MCE 0.0124 0.049 0.0602 711 4166 7620 498 0.116 4.16 0.263 0.000233 95.4
Page 27 of 123
Table 6 summarizes the seismic performance objectives set for the İkitelli Integrated Health
Campus.
B1 Seismic Hazard
Table 6 Seismic performance Objectives
Seismic hazard information is based on the site specific seismic hazard report dated May 2016:
Building Seismic Performance
Seismic Hazard Report: Prof. Dr. M. Erdik, Prof. Dr. S. Akkar and Dr. E. Harmandar, May Hazard Structural Seismic Performance
2016, “İstanbul - İkitelli Entegre Sağlık Kampüsü Deprem Tehlikesi ve Tasarım Esaslı Deprem Nonstructural Seismic Performance
Yer Hareketi Belirlemesi”. Operational 1-A (S-1, N-A)
Basic Safety Earthquake-1
Seismic hazard parameters recommended by the report are as follows: Immediate Occupancy (S-1)
BSE-1N (10% - 50 yrs)
Operational (N-A)
Table 5 Seismic Design Parameters Immediate Occupancy (S-1, N-B)
Basic Safety Earthquake-2
NEHRP SITE CLASS C Immediate Occupancy (S-1)
BSE-2N (2% - 50 yrs)
SMS 1.150 g Position Retention (N-B)
SM1 0.820 g ASCE 41-13 specifies the same structural seismic performance objective for Operational and
SDS 0.750 g Immediate Occupancy building performance objectives: S-1 Immediate Occupancy.
SD1 0.510 g Considering that two seismic hazard levels refer to the same structural performance objective,
< 24 km
the seismic hazard level with higher seismic forces (BSE-2N) is expected to govern the design.
DISTANCE FROM FAULT
ASCE 41-13 specifies BSE-2N level hazard with a uniform 2% probability of exceedance in 50
years, which is equivalent to a hazard with a return period of 2,475 years. This earthquake Table 7 and Table 8 present the earthquakes used for the development of the spectrally matched
hazard is also known as Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE). ground motion histories. Figure 7 to Figure 10 show the spectra developed using the scaled
ground motions and their comparison to the target design spectrum.
Site Specific Acceleration Response Spectra for the site is shown at Figure 6 below.
Figure 6 Acceleration Response Spectra for İkitelli Integrated Health Campus
Page 28 of 123
Minimum Story Stiffnesses
Page 29 of 123
Minimum Story Stiffness for Continued Functionality Drift Criteria
In order to meet the Category IV SISCF peak drift ratio criterion, the superstructuree stiffness must be
limited in order to control floor displacements.
Determining this required stiffness is accomplished by assuming that the 1st fundamental mode will
dominate the structural response. An initial guess of the floor stiffnesses is made based on floor masses as
well as plan and elevation dimensions.
The 1st mode vector is used to determine displacements that would result in a peak drift ratio
corresponding to the criterion. This can be used in conjunction with the stiffness matrix to calculate the
corresponding Story Forces and resulting Base Shear.
Scaled
Initial Drift Drift Story
Stiffness Modal Ratio Ratio Forces
Level M (kips) Guess Vector Vector Vector Disp. (in.) (kips)
18 372 Kips/in 2.04 0.000287 0.00106 7.50 279
17 980 826 1.96 0.000373 0.00137 7.23 1055
16 3053 2561 1.88 0.000607 0.00224 6.91 1942
15 9889 6663 1.77 0.000396 0.00146 6.53 2988
14 9912 31471 1.71 0.000741 0.00273 6.29 4323
13 13424 27795 1.58 0.000477 0.00176 5.82 8816
12 16650 64555 1.50 0.000549 0.00202 5.53 5492
11 17379 78024 1.41 0.000615 0.00227 5.18 4034
10 17719 88715 1.30 0.000674 0.00248 4.80 3762
9 18487 97477 1.19 0.000721 0.00265 4.38 4652
8 19187 105821 1.07 0.000782 0.00288 3.93 5378
7 19187 110141 0.93 0.000811 0.00299 3.44 6139
6 19451 116843 0.80 0.000814 0.00300 2.94 6591
5 19394 114792 0.65 0.000805 0.00297 2.38 6924
4 27021 122934 0.50 0.000719 0.00265 1.83 7334
3 50198 145993 0.36 0.000521 0.00192 1.34 7490
2 118611 178663 0.25 0.000355 0.00131 0.91 6364
1 82924 314710 0.17 0.000304 0.00112 0.64 5072
HE 92299 371394 0.11 0.000232 0.00086 0.40 5259
LE 112386 502198 0.06 0.000133 0.00049 0.21 1718
B01 149057 758358 0.02 7.82E-05 0.00029 0.09 576
B02 95507 1884680 0.01 6.20E-05 0.00023 0.04 227
B03 79134 2682381
Base
96415
Shear
0.1055W
Page 30 of 123
The ratio of the Base Shear determined from the Static Calculation to that calculated on the previous page
is then used to scale the Initial stiffnesses guess and determine the minimum requirement
Minimum Required Stiffness = Base Shear Static / Base Shear Initial Guess * Initial Stiffness
= 0.08W/0.1055W * Initial Stiffness = 0.758 * Initial Stiffness
Minimum
Level Stiffness
18 Kips/in
17 626
16 1940
15 5048
14 23843
13 21058
12 48909
11 59113
10 67213
9 73852
8 80173
7 83446
6 88524
5 86970
4 93139
3 110609
2 135361
1 238434
HE 281380
LE 380481
B01 574556
B02 1427893
B03 2032256
Dynamic Time History Analysis is required to check that these story stiffnesses or any stiffer values meet
the Category IV SISCF 0-3sec Median Sa criterion. The stiffnesses in “BSK - Structural Modal
Information Nov 16 2016” meet this minimum and are used for the analyses that follow.
Page 31 of 123
Dynamic Analysis
Isolated Structure
Code Minimum Fixed Base Design
Page 32 of 123
Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis – Isolated Structure
The figure on the left describes the SAP 2000 model used to represent
the hospital structure. Linear link elements were used for each story
M23 above the isolation plane and the built-in SAP Triple Pendulum Isolator
K22 Element was used to model the behavior of the bearing. 7 spectrally
matched ground motion histories were used along with their 90 degree
rotation for each of the 2475 year MCE hazard and the 475 year DBE
hazard levels. The average results of these motions are summarized in
Table B and Table C.
M6 Fixed Base Lateral Modal Periods:
K5 T1=1.1 sec, T2=1.0 sec
M5
K4 M4 Damping ζ=2%
K3
M3
K2
Weighted Average Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing Properties:
M2
Equivalent Pendulum Lengths: L1 = 28” (704mm)
K1 M1 L2 = 164” (4163mm)
Triple Pendulum L3 = 300” (7621mm)
Isolator Element Lower Bound Friction: f1 =0.007 f2 = 0.045 f3 = 0. 055
Upper Bound Friction: f1 = 0.012 f2 = 0.049 f3 = 0.060
Figure 1: Isolated Model
Table A: Isolated Superstructure Properties
Level M kN kips X-DIR Y-DIR

18 23 168763 372 K kN/m Kips/in kN/m Kips/in
17 22 444625 980 22 224747 1283 144641 826
16 21 1384714 3053 21 640733 3659 448521 2561
15 20 4484599 9889 20 2724727 15559 1166863 6663
14 19 4495388 9912 19 6534914 37315 5511442 31471
13 18 6087775 13424 18 11451937 65392 4867592 27795
12 17 7551136 16650 17 18547766 105910 11305397 64555
11 16 7881615 17379 16 21942153 125293 13664098 78024
10 15 8035659 17719 15 24235051 138386 15536393 88715
9 14 8384044 18487 14 26408395 150796 17070874 97477
8 13 8701813 19187 13 29048671 165872 18532058 105821
7 12 8701813 19187 12 31369366 179124 19288629 110141
6 11 8821366 19451 11 34119461 194827 20462375 116843
5 10 8795684 19394 10 33988734 194081 20103187 114792
4 9 12254398 27021 9 29144943 166422 21528963 122934
3 8 22765736 50198 8 25381136 144930 25567281 145993
2 7 53792007 118611 7 32915994 187955 31288611 178663
1 6 37607038 82924 6 49134856 280567 55114090 314710
HE 5 41859134 92299 5 56818375 324441 65040990 371394
LE 4 50968842 112386 4 71610703 408908 87948416 502198
B01 3 67599760 149057 3 134994472 770838 132808848 758358
B02 2 43313824 95507 2 327054514 1867529 330058047 1884680
B03 1 35888407 79134 1 455100640 2598692 469756889 2682381
Page 33 of 123
Table B: DBE- Isolated Structure & Bearing Response
Lower Bound Friction Upper Bound Friction

Earthquake Displacement Base Shear Average 0-3s Median Sa Average Drift Max Drift
RSN838 5.4” 0.07W 0.41g 0.11% 0.20%
RSN900 9.7” 0.08W 0.43g 0.11% 0.20%
RSN1762 4.7” 0.06W 0.44g 0.11% 0.22%
RSN2893 8.8” 0.08W 0.31g 0.11% 0.21%
RSN3758 12.7” 0.09W 0.47g 0.12% 0.19%
RSN6911 7.9” 0.08W 0.36g 0.09% 0.21%
RSN6890 6.9” 0.07W 0.37g 0.09% 0.17%
RSN838 Rot90 5.5” 0.07W 0.42g 0.12% 0.22%
RSN900 Rot90 9.6” 0.08W 0.43g 0.11% 0.20%
RSN1762 Rot90 4.8” 0.06W 0.45g 0.11% 0.17%
RSN2893 Rot90 8.9” 0.08W 0.31g 0.12% 0.22%
RSN3758 Rot90 12.5” 0.09W 0.48g 0.13% 0.24%
RSN6911 Rot90 8.3” 0.08W 0.36g 0.11% 0.19%
RSN6890 Rot90 7.0” 0.07W 0.38g 0.14% 0.25%
Average 8.1” 0.08W 0.40g 0.11% 0.21%
Table C: MCE- Isolated Structure & Bearing Response
Lower Bound Friction Upper Bound Friction

Earthquake Displacement Base Shear Average 0-3s Median Sa Average Drift Max Drift
RSN161 21.1” 0.12W 0.38g 0.12% 0.30%
RSN266 15.4” 0.10W 0.45g 0.11% 0.21%
RSN838 11.0” 0.09W 0.44g 0.13% 0.27%
RSN1158 17.1” 0.10W 0.43g 0.14% 0.31%
RSN2699 23.0” 0.12W 0.42g 0.13% 0.22%
RSN6890 14.8” 0.10W 0.39g 0.13% 0.25%
RSN6911 16.1” 0.10W 0.41g 0.12% 0.28%
RSN161 Rot90 20.9” 0.12W 0.37g 0.11% 0.19%
RSN266 Rot90 15.9” 0.10W 0.47g 0.15% 0.32%
RSN838 Rot90 11.4” 0.09W 0.44g 0.13% 0.29%
RSN1158 Rot90 17.2” 0.10W 0.42g 0.13% 0.22%
RSN2699 Rot90 22.1” 0.12W 0.43g 0.14% 0.27%
RSN6890 Rot90 15.4” 0.10W 0.41g 0.14% 0.25%
RSN6911 Rot90 16.9” 0.11W 0.43g 0.15% 0.26%
Average 17.0” 0.11W 0.42g 0.13% 0.26%
Page 34 of 123
Sample Sap 2000 Triple Pendulum Element Output
Normalized Shear
Figure 1: Triple Pendulum Sample Weighted Average Lower Bound Friction Hysteretic Behavior
Example Upper Bound Hysteretic Behavior

0.15
0.1
0.05
Normalized Shear
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
Isolator Displacement (in.)
Figure 2: Triple Pendulum Sample Weighted Average Upper Bound Friction Hysteretic Behavior
Page 35 of 123
Sample Isolated Structure 0-3s Median Sa Calculation
Floor Acceleration (g)
Figure 4: Sample Isolated Structure Floor Acceleration

Spectral Acceleration (g)
Figure 5: Sample Isolated Structure 0-3 sec Median Spectral Acceleration
Page 36 of 123
Table D: Isolated Structure DBE- 0-3 sec Median Spectral Accelerations (g)
RSN838 RSN900 RSN1762 RSN2893 RSN3758 RSN6911 RSN6890 RSN838 RSN900 RSN1762 RSN2893 RSN3758 RSN6911 RSN6890
Rot90 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90
18 0.65 0.78 0.68 0.45 0.73 0.51 0.58 0.66 0.84 0.70 0.41 0.75 0.50 0.61
17 0.63 0.76 0.67 0.43 0.71 0.49 0.56 0.64 0.81 0.69 0.39 0.73 0.50 0.60
16 0.61 0.65 0.64 0.42 0.68 0.48 0.54 0.62 0.72 0.66 0.38 0.71 0.49 0.58
15 0.58 0.57 0.60 0.41 0.63 0.47 0.50 0.59 0.59 0.61 0.37 0.65 0.48 0.52
14 0.55 0.53 0.57 0.38 0.61 0.46 0.46 0.56 0.52 0.58 0.37 0.63 0.47 0.50
13 0.52 0.50 0.52 0.37 0.59 0.45 0.44 0.54 0.48 0.54 0.37 0.60 0.46 0.48
12 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.36 0.56 0.44 0.43 0.48 0.46 0.51 0.36 0.57 0.45 0.46
11 0.47 0.44 0.46 0.36 0.55 0.43 0.41 0.49 0.44 0.49 0.36 0.55 0.43 0.44
10 0.45 0.43 0.45 0.35 0.53 0.41 0.40 0.47 0.43 0.47 0.35 0.53 0.42 0.41
9 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.34 0.51 0.39 0.38 0.45 0.43 0.45 0.34 0.51 0.40 0.40
8 0.42 0.41 0.43 0.34 0.49 0.38 0.36 0.43 0.42 0.43 0.33 0.48 0.38 0.38
7 0.40 0.40 0.41 0.32 0.46 0.36 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.42 0.33 0.46 0.37 0.36
6 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.31 0.45 0.35 0.34 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.32 0.45 0.35 0.35
5 0.35 0.37 0.37 0.30 0.42 0.33 0.33 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.29 0.42 0.31 0.33
4 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.28 0.39 0.31 0.30 0.33 0.34 0.36 0.28 0.38 0.29 0.31
3 0.31 0.32 0.35 0.27 0.35 0.28 0.28 0.31 0.32 0.35 0.26 0.36 0.28 0.28
2 0.31 0.31 0.34 0.25 0.33 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.30 0.33 0.26 0.35 0.28 0.28
1 0.28 0.30 0.33 0.23 0.33 0.25 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.32 0.25 0.34 0.26 0.27
HE 0.27 0.29 0.33 0.22 0.32 0.24 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.32 0.23 0.33 0.25 0.27
LE 0.26 0.28 0.32 0.21 0.31 0.24 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.32 0.22 0.32 0.24 0.26
B01 0.26 0.28 0.31 0.21 0.31 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.31 0.22 0.31 0.24 0.26
B02 0.26 0.27 0.31 0.20 0.30 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.31 0.22 0.31 0.24 0.25
B03 0.25 0.27 0.31 0.21 0.30 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.21 0.30 0.24 0.25
Av. 0.41 0.43 0.44 0.31 0.47 0.36 0.37 0.42 0.43 0.45 0.31 0.48 0.36 0.38
Page 37 of 123
Table E: Isolated Structure MCE- 0-3 sec Median Spectral Accelerations (g)
RSN161 RSN266 RSN838 RSN1158 RSN2699 RSN6890 RSN6911

RSN161 RSN266 RSN838 RSN1158 RSN2699 RSN6890 RSN6911 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90 Rot90
18 0.52 0.64 0.67 0.64 0.55 0.53 0.55 0.51 0.68 0.68 0.62 0.54 0.61 0.59
17 0.51 0.63 0.65 0.62 0.55 0.51 0.54 0.49 0.66 0.65 0.61 0.54 0.58 0.58
16 0.50 0.61 0.64 0.61 0.54 0.49 0.53 0.49 0.64 0.63 0.59 0.53 0.56 0.57
15 0.48 0.58 0.61 0.59 0.54 0.48 0.52 0.48 0.62 0.60 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.56
14 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.58 0.53 0.47 0.51 0.47 0.60 0.57 0.56 0.52 0.51 0.55
13 0.46 0.54 0.54 0.56 0.52 0.46 0.49 0.46 0.57 0.55 0.54 0.52 0.48 0.54
12 0.45 0.53 0.51 0.55 0.51 0.45 0.49 0.45 0.55 0.52 0.52 0.51 0.47 0.53
11 0.44 0.51 0.49 0.53 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.43 0.53 0.50 0.50 0.51 0.46 0.51
10 0.43 0.49 0.47 0.52 0.47 0.43 0.47 0.42 0.52 0.48 0.48 0.50 0.45 0.49
9 0.42 0.47 0.46 0.50 0.47 0.42 0.45 0.41 0.50 0.47 0.47 0.49 0.43 0.47
8 0.41 0.46 0.45 0.48 0.46 0.41 0.42 0.40 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.48 0.41 0.44
7 0.40 0.44 0.43 0.45 0.44 0.39 0.41 0.39 0.45 0.44 0.43 0.46 0.39 0.41
6 0.37 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.44 0.37 0.38
5 0.34 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.37 0.37 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.38 0.41 0.36 0.36
4 0.33 0.38 0.36 0.33 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.39 0.37 0.35 0.38 0.34 0.34
3 0.31 0.38 0.35 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.31 0.38 0.34 0.31 0.34 0.33 0.33
2 0.30 0.37 0.35 0.30 0.33 0.31 0.32 0.30 0.37 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.33
1 0.28 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.31 0.30 0.31 0.27 0.36 0.32 0.28 0.30 0.31 0.32
HE 0.25 0.33 0.30 0.26 0.29 0.28 0.30 0.24 0.36 0.30 0.26 0.30 0.29 0.31
LE 0.24 0.32 0.29 0.26 0.29 0.28 0.30 0.24 0.35 0.30 0.27 0.30 0.28 0.31
B01 0.24 0.32 0.29 0.26 0.30 0.28 0.29 0.24 0.35 0.30 0.27 0.30 0.28 0.30
B02 0.24 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.24 0.35 0.30 0.27 0.30 0.28 0.30
B03 0.24 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.24 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.30 0.28 0.30
Av. 0.38 0.45 0.44 0.43 0.42 0.39 0.41 0.37 0.47 0.44 0.42 0.43 0.41 0.43
Page 38 of 123
Table F: Isolated Structure DBE- Peak Drift Ratios (%)

17 0.20 0.19 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.17 0.20 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.19 0.14 0.24
16 0.18 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.14 0.20 0.13 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.19 0.15 0.24
15 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.17 0.19 0.14 0.22 0.20 0.17 0.20 0.24 0.19 0.25
14 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.10 0.12
13 0.17 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.19 0.12 0.14 0.17 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.21 0.17 0.19
12 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.11
11 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.14 0.11 0.13
10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.15
9 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.13 0.16
8 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.16 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.14 0.17
7 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.17 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.18
6 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.17 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.15 0.18
5 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.17
4 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.18
3 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.12 0.13 0.17 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.18
2 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12
1 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.09
HE 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.08
LE 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.06
B01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
B02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
B03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Av. 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.14
Max 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.21 0.17 0.22 0.20 0.17 0.22 0.24 0.19 0.25
Page 39 of 123
Table G: Isolated Structure MCE- Peak Drift Ratios (%)

17 0.19 0.21 0.27 0.30 0.20 0.25 0.28 0.19 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.27 0.21 0.21
16 0.22 0.20 0.24 0.30 0.19 0.22 0.27 0.14 0.27 0.25 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.22
15 0.30 0.21 0.25 0.31 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.11 0.32 0.29 0.22 0.26 0.25 0.26
14 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
13 0.19 0.15 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.18 0.13 0.12 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.22
12 0.11 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13
11 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.15
10 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.16
9 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.18
8 0.11 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.12 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.19
7 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.17 0.13 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.21
6 0.12 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.18 0.13 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.22
5 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.18 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.22
4 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.22
3 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.21 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.15 0.20 0.18 0.20
2 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.14
1 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.09
HE 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.08
LE 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.06
B01 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
B02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
B03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02
Av. 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15
Max 0.30 0.21 0.27 0.31 0.22 0.25 0.28 0.19 0.32 0.29 0.22 0.27 0.25 0.26
Page 40 of 123
Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis - Fixed Base Code Minimum Design
The figure on the left describes the SAP 2000 model used to represent a
possible fixed base design. ASCE 7-16 Provisions for Linear Response
M23 History Analysis (12.9.2) as well as the allowable drift limits (12.12-1)
K22 were used to determine the story elastic stiffnesses. Multilinear Plastic
link elements with these elastic stiffnesses, yield strengths equal to twice
the demand calculated in accordance with 12.9.2, and a strain hardening
ratio of 0.02 were then used to model each story.
7 spectrally matched ground motion histories and were used for each of
M6 the 2475 year MCE hazard and the 475 year DBE hazard levels. The 90
K6 degree rotation is ignored due to symmetry. The average results of these
M5 motions are summarized in Table I and Table J.
K5
K4 M4
M3 Fixed Base Lateral Modal Periods:
K3
M2
T1=2.8 sec, T2=2.6 sec
K2
Damping ζ=2%
M1
K1
Table H: Fixed Base Code Minimum Superstructure Properties
X-DIR & Y-DIR Vy=2*Ve*I/R

Level M kN kips K kN/m Kips/in kN kips
18 22 168763 372 22 74236 424 66466 380
17 21 444625 980 21 217294 1241 178149 1017
16 20 1384714 3053 20 652276 3725 404746 2311
15 19 4484599 9889 19 1480655 8455 926842 5292
14 18 4495388 9912 18 2104401 12016 1312950 7497
13 17 6087775 13424 17 2871975 16399 1799318 10274
12 16 7551136 16650 16 3682881 21030 2312648 13206
11 15 7881615 17379 15 4395580 25099 2755056 15732
10 14 8035659 17719 14 5035522 28754 3126841 17855
9 13 8384044 18487 13 5567326 31790 3443079 19660
8 12 8701813 19187 12 6001143 34267 3702093 21139
7 11 8701813 19187 11 6387886 36476 3944803 22525
6 10 8821366 19451 10 6145679 35093 4140626 23644
5 9 8795684 19394 9 6350430 36262 4266301 24361
4 8 12254398 27021 8 6498635 37108 4369944 24953
3 7 22765736 50198 7 5548272 31681 4526301 25846
2 6 53792007 118611 6 6788237 38762 5180088 29579
1 5 37607038 82924 5 7379848 42140 5829894 33290
HE 4 41859134 92299 4 8338736 47615 6618663 37794
LE 3 50968842 112386 3 8050097 45967 7560218 43170
B01 2 67599760 149057 2 12992367 74188 8402438 47979
B02 1 43313824 95507 1 15460990 88285 8859347 50588
Page 41 of 123
Table I: DBE- Fixed Base Structure Response
Fixed Base
Earthquake Base Shear Av. 0-3s Median Sa Av. Peak Drift Max Peak Drift Max Residual Drift
RSN838 0.12W 1.10g 1.13% 1.76% 1.01%
RSN900 0.15W 1.30g 1.37% 1.68% 0.92%
RSN1762 0.13W 1.13g 1.00% 1.65% 0.85%
RSN2893 0.14W 0.98g 1.31% 2.07% 1.28%
RSN3758 0.16W 1.30g 1.45% 2.11% 1.24%
RSN6911 0.12W 1.18g 1.23% 2.28% 1.45%
RSN6890 0.14W 1.03g 1.15% 1.91% 1.19%
Average 0.14W 1.15g 1.23% 1.67% 1.13%
Table J: MCE- Fixed Base Structure Response
Fixed Base
Earthquake Base Shear Av. 0-3s Median Sa Av. Peak Drift Max Peak Drift Max Residual Drift
RSN161 0.15W 1.28g 1.67% 3.08% 1.52%
RSN266 0.15W 1.46g 1.79% 2.96% 1.87%
RSN838 0.14W 1.40g 1.66% 2.41% 1.52%
RSN1158 0.14W 1.30g 1.57% 2.28% 1.50%
RSN2699 0.16W 1.31g 2.03% 3.24% 2.29%
RSN6890 0.14W 1.21g 1.47% 2.09% 1.16%
RSN6911 0.14W 1.31g 1.82% 2.93% 1.73%
Average 0.15W 1.32g 1.71% 2.71% 1.65%
Page 42 of 123
Sample Fixed Base Structure 0-3s Median Sa Calculation
Floor Acceleration (g)
Figure 4: Sample Fixed Base Structure Floor Acceleration

Spectral Acceleration (g)
Figure 5: Sample Fixed Base Structure 0-3 sec Median Spectral Acceleration
Page 43 of 123
Table K: Fixed Base DBE- 0-3 sec Median Spectral Accelerations (g)
RSN838
RSN838 RSN900 RSN1762 RSN2893 RSN3758 RSN6911 RSN6890 Rot90
2.45 3.57 2.52 2.20 3.23 2.92 2.42 2.45
18
2.41 2.90 2.27 2.09 2.72 2.54 2.14 2.41

17
2.29 2.41 2.17 1.74 2.40 2.03 1.88 2.29

16
2.00 1.80 2.04 1.49 2.10 1.84 1.67 2.00

15
1.62 1.71 1.68 1.43 1.96 1.72 1.50 1.62

14
1.40 1.62 1.57 1.33 1.69 1.65 1.38 1.40

13
1.18 1.44 1.28 1.22 1.52 1.41 1.15 1.18

12
1.12 1.38 1.25 1.08 1.45 1.25 1.10 1.12

11
1.06 1.34 1.22 1.02 1.39 1.22 1.04 1.06

10
0.97 1.24 1.07 0.97 1.25 1.10 0.97 0.97

9
0.93 1.09 0.97 0.83 1.05 1.01 0.86 0.93

8
0.91 0.94 0.90 0.83 0.90 0.97 0.82 0.91

7
0.86 0.84 0.87 0.82 0.87 0.92 0.77 0.86

6
0.82 0.95 0.79 0.84 0.91 0.88 0.74 0.82

5
0.78 0.94 0.84 0.78 0.96 0.89 0.84 0.78

4
0.82 0.86 0.84 0.72 0.96 0.84 0.81 0.82

3
0.78 0.74 0.74 0.63 0.87 0.73 0.72 0.78

2
0.66 0.81 0.70 0.55 0.79 0.62 0.64 0.66

1
0.58 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.73 0.62 0.55 0.58

HE
0.50 0.74 0.52 0.40 0.72 0.57 0.50 0.50

LE
0.39 0.70 0.44 0.36 0.56 0.49 0.45 0.39

B01
0.34 0.61 0.40 0.34 0.49 0.46 0.42 0.34

B02
0.31 0.54 0.33 0.34 0.44 0.44 0.40 0.31

B03
1.10 1.30 1.13 0.98 1.30 1.18 1.03 1.10

Av.
Page 44 of 123
Table L: Fixed Base MCE- 0-3 sec Median Spectral Accelerations (g)

18 2.90 3.61 2.96 3.25 2.52 2.62 2.91
17 2.70 3.14 2.82 2.88 2.47 2.54 2.78
16 2.57 2.83 2.58 2.46 2.37 2.31 2.50
15 2.13 2.40 2.47 2.23 2.12 1.95 2.06
14 1.84 2.06 2.15 1.94 1.93 1.84 1.87
13 1.71 1.77 1.89 1.67 1.74 1.62 1.78
12 1.43 1.65 1.69 1.45 1.55 1.40 1.55
11 1.32 1.52 1.52 1.34 1.45 1.28 1.44
10 1.21 1.44 1.41 1.25 1.39 1.20 1.32
9 1.11 1.33 1.27 1.14 1.24 1.15 1.20
8 1.01 1.22 1.18 1.02 1.23 1.10 1.11
7 0.94 1.12 1.12 0.92 1.17 1.04 1.09
6 0.94 1.02 1.10 0.85 1.15 0.97 1.04
5 0.93 0.98 1.01 0.81 1.09 0.89 0.97
4 0.95 0.93 1.04 0.79 1.04 0.82 0.92
3 0.94 0.95 1.08 0.80 1.01 0.82 0.83
2 0.87 0.87 1.03 0.83 0.93 0.75 0.72
1 0.72 0.81 0.90 0.78 0.87 0.71 0.72
HE 0.71 0.91 0.75 0.80 0.74 0.73 0.71
LE 0.66 0.84 0.65 0.76 0.60 0.68 0.72
B01 0.63 0.73 0.58 0.71 0.50 0.57 0.68
B02 0.57 0.68 0.52 0.67 0.51 0.47 0.65
B03 0.56 0.69 0.48 0.66 0.52 0.48 0.69
Av. 1.28 1.46 1.40 1.30 1.31 1.21 1.31
Page 45 of 123
Table M: Fixed Base DBE- Peak Drift Ratios (%)

17 1.00 1.13 0.98 1.01 1.19 1.21 1.21
16 1.46 1.48 1.14 0.87 1.51 1.02 1.07
15 1.54 1.51 1.06 0.92 1.63 0.80 0.85
14 0.98 1.48 0.99 1.38 1.48 0.96 1.29
13 1.13 1.59 0.84 2.04 1.88 1.37 1.83
12 1.33 1.24 0.79 1.76 1.61 1.68 1.27
11 1.28 1.29 0.72 1.90 1.21 1.70 0.90
10 1.04 1.63 0.74 2.07 1.41 1.65 0.83
9 0.78 1.44 0.76 1.71 1.32 1.26 0.83
8 0.70 1.34 0.79 1.64 1.26 1.05 0.87
7 0.71 1.51 0.92 1.67 1.31 1.00 0.95
6 0.76 1.52 1.02 1.33 1.22 0.94 0.87
5 0.78 1.41 1.00 1.10 1.20 0.87 0.78
4 0.79 1.28 1.01 1.05 1.26 0.88 0.76
3 0.88 1.15 1.19 1.04 1.49 1.23 0.81
2 1.47 1.14 1.24 1.33 1.91 2.28 0.84
1 1.61 0.92 1.65 1.26 1.09 1.92 1.28
HE 1.57 0.99 1.03 1.07 1.48 1.52 1.67
LE 1.76 1.62 1.06 0.88 1.39 1.13 1.91
B01 1.13 1.65 1.06 0.84 1.18 0.78 1.18
B02 1.14 1.68 0.97 0.99 1.81 0.90 1.47
B03 0.94 1.11 1.07 0.91 2.11 0.87 1.80
Av. 1.13 1.37 1.00 1.31 1.45 1.23 1.15
Max 1.76 1.68 1.65 2.07 2.11 2.28 1.91
Page 46 of 123
Table N: Fixed Base MCE- Peak Drift Ratios (%)

17 1.47 2.32 2.03 1.26 2.11 2.23 1.41
16 1.60 2.18 1.81 1.28 1.87 2.04 1.83
15 1.34 1.76 1.50 0.94 1.67 1.34 1.64
14 2.04 1.49 2.26 2.09 1.79 1.96 1.37
13 2.51 2.05 1.57 3.27 1.79 2.92 1.45
12 1.83 2.22 1.11 3.16 1.48 2.20 1.14
11 1.41 2.19 1.66 2.85 1.29 1.71 1.04
10 1.36 1.97 2.21 2.48 1.31 1.59 1.39
9 1.19 1.44 1.90 1.93 0.96 1.35 1.53
8 1.17 1.19 1.74 1.52 0.92 1.20 1.65
7 1.40 1.03 1.79 1.26 0.87 1.15 1.83
6 1.63 0.90 1.39 1.14 0.84 1.03 1.64
5 1.92 0.88 1.11 1.25 0.91 1.04 1.36
4 2.26 0.85 1.11 1.32 0.95 1.07 1.23
3 2.36 0.99 1.26 1.41 1.05 1.38 1.47
2 1.56 1.50 2.11 1.76 1.89 2.65 2.32
1 2.99 2.36 1.64 2.62 1.81 2.92 3.08
HE 2.20 1.93 1.69 2.52 1.48 2.48 2.23
LE 1.52 2.33 1.11 2.77 1.79 1.94 1.82
B01 1.21 1.59 1.01 1.90 1.62 1.29 1.32
B02 1.91 1.63 1.17 2.66 1.82 1.73 1.93
B03 2.48 1.43 1.81 2.93 1.66 2.58 1.98
Av. 1.79 1.65 1.59 2.01 1.45 1.81 1.67
Max 2.99 2.36 2.26 3.27 2.11 2.92 3.08
Page 47 of 123
Seismic Design Forces
Page 48 of 123
Superstructure Seismic Force Distributions
Based on stick model dynamic analysis, two force distributions are presented:
1) Shear Force - This distribution is intended for the shear design of the superstructure. The distribution is
based on the peak story shear at each level, averaged across all time history cases. The shear forces are
then used to determine story forces that will result in this average maximum shear distribution.
2) Overturning - This distribution is intended for the design of the foundation and the rigidity of the lower
floor levels to control overturning. The maximum overturning force for each time history case is first
found. The force distribution for the time history case corresponding to, or closest to the median value of
the cases is then chosen. Finally, this distribution is scaled such that resulting overturning moment
matches the average value across all time history cases.
Page 49 of 123
DBE ‐ Shear Force Envelope ‐ X Direction Fx (kips) Vx (kips)
0 5000 10000 0 50000 100000
V (kip) V(kip) scl'd Fx (kip) 0.999996674
269 269 269 18 18 1126811.026
734 734 465 17 17 1828950.976
1793 1793 1059 16 16 3924980.973
4723 4723 2930 15 15 10358337.61
7246 7246 2523 14 14 8493043.957
10241 10241 2995 13 13 9574819.956
13540 13540 3298 12 12 9985882.9
16695 16695 3155 11 11 9018316.667
19627 19627 2932 10 10 7884227.797
22364 22364 2737 9 9 6896247.924
24804 24804 2440 8 8 5734643
5734643.609
609
26888 26887 2084 7 7 4545039.058
28795 28795 1908 6 6 3838249.985
30525 30525 1729 5 5 3158962.992
32508 32508 1983 4 4 3256132.509
35343 35343 2835 3 3 4129591.082
41318 41318 5975 2 2 7362839.279
45213 45213 3895 1 1 3987034.923
48494 48494 3281 HE HE 2647978.664
51215 51215 2721 LE LE 1606983.166 Base Shear
55792 55792 4577 B01 B01 1531802.512 (W)
60204 60204 4412 B02 B02 694775.6304 0.065
64788 64788 4584 B03 B03 0
Page 50 of 123
DBE ‐ Shear Force Envelope ‐ Y Direction Fx (kips) Vx (kips)
0 5000 10000 0 50000 100000
402 402 402 1 1 1684865.443
1033 1033 631 2 2 2481114.711
2185 2185 1153 3 3 4269926.871
5056 5056 2871 4 4 10149012.88
7735 7735 2679 5 5 9016880.287
10559 10559 2824 6 6 9028028.903
13821 13820 3262 7 7 9875382.41
16937 16937 3117 8 8 8908004.685
19923 19923 2986 9 9 8028769.185
22833 22832 2910 10 10 7331345.386
25439 25439 2606 11 11 6125880.665
6125880 665
27701 27701 2262 12 12 4933669.089
29565 29565 1864 13 13 3750738.583
31045 31045 1480 14 14 2702759.752
32681 32681 1637 15 15 2686989.871
35017 35016 2335 16 16 3401472.455
39243 39243 4226 17 17 5207882.75
42279 42279 3036 18 18 3107909.843
45871 45871 3592 19 19 2898886.416
49484 49484 3614 20 20 2134079.062 Base Shear
55274 55273 5789 21 21 1937304.602 (W)
59624 59623 4350 22 22 685030.1416 0.065
64513 64513 4890 23 23 0
Page 51 of 123
DBE ‐ Shear Force Envelope ‐ SRSS Fx (kips) Vx (kips)
0 5000 10000 0 50000 100000
420 420 420 1 1 1761994.9
1094 1094 674 2 2 2650161.8
2424 2424 1330 3 3 4925484.1
5951 5951 3527 4 4 12471203
9037 9037 3086 5 5 10386902
12447 12447 3410 6 6 10902718
16227 16227 3780 7 7 11444534
19809 19809 3582 8 8 10238589
23265 23265 3455 9 9 9290642
26452 26452 3187 10 10 8030840.3
29363 29363 2911 11 11 6842009
6842009.1
1
31927 31927 2564 12 12 5591984.4
34235 34235 2309 13 13 4644833.1
36283 36283 2047 14 14 3739699.1
38546 38546 2264 15 15 3716279.5
41590 41590 3044 16 16 4433786.5
46908 46907 5317 17 17 6552647.9
50027 50027 3120 18 18 3193605.1
53476 53476 3448 19 19 2783207.4
57116 57116 3640 20 20 2149612.2 Base Shear
62939 62939 5823 21 21 1948738.1 (W)
68587 68587 5648 22 22 889414.68 0.076
74935 74935 6348 23 23 0
Page 52 of 123
DBE ‐Overturning Force Distribution ‐ X Direction Fx (kips) Vx (kips)
0 5000 10000 0 50000 100000
F(kip) raw F(kip) scl'd Vx (kip) 0.985501526
44 44 44 18 186442.1203
18 186442.1203
136 134 178 17 17 536293.5432
853 841 1019 16 16 3160243.807
2638 2599 3618 15 15 9325129.715
2151 2120 5738 14 14 7241520.946
2397 2363 8101 13 13 7664249.706
2565 2528 10629 12 12 7765321.368
2434 2398 13027 11 11 6955662.337
2418 2383 15410 10 10 6502682.813
2508 2471 17881 9 9 6318220.172
2464 2428 20310 8 8 5791687.874
5791687 874
2168 2137 22446 7 7 4728779.036
1849 1822 24268 6 6 3719241.397
1529 1507 25775 5 5 2792775.623
1752 1726 27501 4 4 2875679.976
2671 2633 30134 3 3 3891422.284
5603 5522 35656 2 2 6905005.897
5659 5577 41233 1 1 5792793.861
4393 4329 45562 HE HE 3545224.319
7632 7521 53083 LE LE 4507096.53
7400 7293 60376 B01 B01 2476487.931
5550 5469 65845 B02 B02 873943.4052
4087 4028 69874 B03 B03 0
Resulting Overturning Moment Before scaling
(kip‐in)
103555905
Resulting Overturning Moment After scaling
102054502
Page 53 of 123
DBE ‐Overturning Force Distribution ‐ Y Direction Fx (kips) Vx (kips)
0 5000 10000 0 40000
F(kip) raw F(kip) scl'd Vx (kip) 0.9548528
40 38 38 18 167677.6368
18 167677.6368
70 67 105 17 17 274554.4777
405 387 492 16 16 1501163.754
2439 2329 2821 15 15 8624346.556
2532 2417 5238 14 14 8522278.601
3426 3271 8510 13 13 10952693.73
3824 3652 12161 12 12 11578105.06
3480 3323 15485 11 11 9947202.108
3184 3041 18525 10 10 8563015.626
2986 2851 21376 9 9 7523003.88
2723 2601 23977 8 8 6401259
6401259.168
168
2393 2285 26262 7 7 5219555.004
2138 2041 28303 6 6 4300939.725
1739 1660 29963 5 5 3175868.704
1680 1604 31567 4 4 2757549.19
1810 1729 33296 3 3 2637202.492
5187 4952 38248 2 2 6391320.884
2997 2862 41110 1 1 3067995.497
3241 3095 44205 HE HE 2616117.407
3112 2972 47177 LE LE 1838084.354
3849 3675 50852 B01 B01 1287911.376
2202 2102 52954 B02 B02 346709.7752
1724 1647 54601 B03 B03 0
(kip‐in)
107694555
Resulting Overturning Moment After scaling
102832446
Page 54 of 123
Damage Estimation
Page 55 of 123
Median Expected
Median Expected Median Total
Average 0-3s Acceleration Structural Damage
Average Peak Drift Drift Induced Max Residual Drift Expected Damage
Median Spectral Induced Damage (% Construction
Ratio (%) Damage (% Ratio (%) (% Construction
Acceleration (g) (% Construction Cost)
Construction Cost) Cost)
Cost)
Isolated DBE 0.4 1.5 0.11 0.3 0 0.0 1.8
Isolated MCE 0.42 1.7 0.13 0.4 0 0.0 2.1
Fixed DBE 1.15 7.7 1.23 8.5 1.3 5.2 21.4
Fixed MCE 1.32 9.5 1.71 14.3 1.65 11.2 23.8
Table 1: Estimated Damage Based on Stick Model Dynamic Analysis
Page 56 of 123
Damage Estimation
In developing the Continued Functionality Standard, a representative FEMA P58 Model was created in order to estimate the repair
costs associated with architectural and structural components. The Normative Quantity Estimation Tool was used for the selection of
component fragilities and quantities as per hospital occupancy. The MEP located at the roof level is assumed to be sufficiently
seismically protected for all structure types.
The Earthquake Demand Parameters (EDPs) were input unidirectional using the average of the SRSS EDPs across ground motion
cases. The median spectral acceleration from zero to three seconds divided by a factor of 3 was used instead of peak acceleration
which is more sensitive to numerical error and modelling assumptions. Using information drawn from this model as well as reported
damage from actual earthquake events, the following relationships between earthquake demand parameters and median expected
damage as a percentage of construction cost were developed.
Acceleration Induced Structural Damage

16
14
Expected Percentage Damage (%)
12
10
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Average Median 0-3sec Sa(g)
Page 57 of 123
Drift Induced Architectural Damage
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Average Peak Drift Ratio (%)
Structural Damage
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Maximum Residual Drift Ratio (%)
Page 58 of 123
Time Histories
Page 59 of 123
DBE Scaled Time History Records
Sa (g)
Sa (g)
Page 60 of 123
Sa (g)
Sa (g)
Page 61 of 123
Sa (g)
Sa (g)
Page 62 of 123
Sa (g)
Sa (g)
Page 63 of 123
MCE Scaled Time History Records
Sa (g)
Sa (g)
Page 64 of 123
Sa (g)
Sa (g)
Page 65 of 123
Sa (g)
Sa (g)
Page 66 of 123
Sa (g)
Sa (g)
Page 67 of 123
Bearing Design Calculations
Page 68 of 123
Page 69 of 123
Check Vertical Load Capacity ACI-318 with Confined Concrete Sqrt(A2/A1) = 2
Type 5 Type 4 Type 3 Type 2 Type 1
FPT15656/32-32/22-11 FPT15651/26-20R/19-12 FPT15646/22-20/16-8 FPT15641/16-12R/12-7 FPT15636/10-8R/8-5
Undisplaced Position D+L D+L D+L D+L D+L
Concrete Strength f'c = f'c 7.25 ksi.
Slider Diameter b 32.0 in. 26.0 in. 22.1 in. 16.0 in. 10.0 in.
Concave Plate Thickness at edge of Slider tc 2.82 in. 2.51 in. 2.39 in. 2.20 in. 2.10 in.
Base Plate Thickness tb 0.00 in. No Base Plate 0.00 in. No Base Plate 0.00 in. No Base Plate 0.00 in. No Base Plate 0.00 in. No Base Plate
Effective Concave and Base Plate Thickness teff 2.8 in. 2.5 in. 2.4 in. 2.2 in. 2.1 in.
Concrete Strength f'c f'c 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa
Confinement Sqrt(A2/A1) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Steel Strength fy (ksi) fy 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa
Concrete Reduction Factor Thc 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65
Steel Reduction Factor Ths 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Bearing Strength =Thc*0.85*f'c*Sqrt(A2/A11) Fbu 8.01 ksi. 8.01 ksi. 8.01 ksi. 8.01 ksi. 8.01 ksi.
MU = Ths*fy*t^2/4 = Ths*fy*Z 71.6 kip-in. 56.7 kip-in. 51.4 kip-in. 43.6 kip-in. 39.7 kip-in.
Assume b1 b1 39.8 in. 32.9 in. 28.75 in. 22.0 in. 15.0 in.
r = (b1-b)/2 r 3.9 in. 3.5 in. 3.3 in. 3.0 in. 2.5 in.
Mu (simplified) =Fbu*r^2/2+Fbu*(b1/b-1)*r^2/3 Mus 70.8 kip-in. 56.1 kip-in. 53.2 kip-in. 45.1 kip-in. 33.4 kip-in.
b/b1 0.80 0.79 0.77 0.73 0.67
Adjustment from Simplified to Exact Moments (Fig. 7-2) 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.00
Mu (Exact) =Mus * factor 70.83 < 71.6 Assumed 56.11 < 56.7 Assumed 51.57 ~ 51.4 Assumed 43.26 < 43.6 Assumed 33.38 < 39.7 Assumed
See Attached Paper by Constantinou, Whittaker & Fenz
Pu =Fbu*3.14*b1^2/4 = 1.2D+1.6RL Capacity Pu 9962 kips 44472 kn 6807 kips 30389 kn 5198 kips 23206 kn 3044 kips 13588 kn 1415 kips 6317 kn
Check Listed Permissible Vertical Load OK > 44196 kN OK > 30357 kN OK > 23200 kN OK > 13580 kN OK > 6300kN
Displaced Position at Dm D+L+E D+L+E D+L+E D+L+E D+L+E
Slider Diameter b 32.0 in. 26.0 in. 22.1 in. 16.0 in. 10.0 in.
Effective Concave and Base Plate Thickness teff 2.8 in. 2.5 in. 2.4 in. 2.2 in. 2.1 in.
Concrete Strength f'c f'c 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa 7.25 ksi. 50 Mpa
Confinement Sqrt(A2/A1) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Steel Strength fy (ksi) fy 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa 40.0 ksi. 276 Mpa
Concrete Reduction Factor Thc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Steel Reduction Factor Ths 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Bearing Strength =Thc*0.85*f'c*Sqrt(A2/A11) Fbu 12.33 ksi. 12.33 ksi. 12.33 ksi. 12.33 ksi. 12.33 ksi.
MU = Ths*fy*t^2/4 = Ths*fy*Z 79.5 kip-in. 63.0 kip-in. 57.1 kip-in. 48.4 kip-in. 44.1 kip-in.
Assume b1 b1 38.6 in. 32.0 in. 27.6 in. 21.0 in. 14.6 in.
r = (b1-b)/2 r 3.3 in. 3.0 in. 2.8 in. 2.5 in. 2.3 in.
Mu (simplified) =Fbu*r^2/2+Fbu*(b1/b-1)*r^2/3 Mus 76.3 kip-in. 64.0 kip-in. 54.3 kip-in. 46.5 kip-in. 42.6 kip-in.
b/b1 0.83 0.81 0.80 0.76 0.68
Adjustment from Simplified to Exact Moments (Fig. 7-2) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mu (Exact) =Mus * factor 76.34 < 79.5 Assumed 62.72 < 63.0 Assumed 54.34 < 57.1 Assumed 46.54 < 48.4 Assumed 42.60 < 44.1 Assumed
See Attached Paper by Constantinou, Whittaker & Fenz
Pu =Fbu*3.14*b1^2/4 Pu 14416 kips 64355 kn 9907 kips 44229 kn 7370 kips 32902 kn 4267 kips 19048 kn 2062 kips 9207 kn
Check With Listed (1.2D+0.5RL+E ) Vertical Load OK > 61607 kN OK > 44196 kN OK > 32589 kN OK > 17857 kN OK > 8036 kN
Check Strength of Inner Slider Dia. 22.0 in. 19.0 in. 16.0 in. 12.0 in. 8.0 in.
Area A 380 in.^2 283 in.^2 201 in.^2 113 in.^2 50 in.^2
Pu based on 60 ksi. Pu 22796 kips 101770 kn 17003 kips 75907 kn 12058 kips 53829 kn 6782 kips 30279 kn 3014 kips 13457 kn
Py based on 40 ksi. Pn 15198 kips 67846 kn 11335 kips 50604 kn 8038 kips 35886 kn 4522 kips 20186 kn 2010 kips 8971 kn
Page 70 of 123
Reference:
Procedure for Designing Friction Pendulum

Bearing on Concrete
Section 7 of “Seismic Isolation of Bridges”

June 30, 2007 by
M.C. Constantinou, A.S. Whittaker and
D.M. Fenz
Page 71 of 123
7. PROCEDURE FOR DESIGN OF END PLATES OF SLIDING BEARINGS
7.1 Introduction
The end plates of sliding bearings appear as column base plates and can be designed as
such (e.g., see DeWolf and Ricker, 2000). This is best illustrated in the Friction
Pendulum Bearing as, for example, in the Double Concave Friction Pendulum Bearing
shown in Figure 7-1, which will be used in this section for calculations of capacity. The
procedure followed herein for the capacity check of the end plates follows principles
similar to those used in the safety check of end plates of elastomeric bearings presented
in Section 6. For Friction Pendulum Bearings the overturning moment may be neglected
and instead the axial load may be considered concentrically transferred at the location of
the articulated slider. That is, the contribution to overturning moment due to PΔ is not
considered when the bearing is analyzed in the deformed position. This is equivalent to
the treatment of elastomeric bearings by use of the reduced area as described in Section 6.
Analysis and safety checks of the end plates need to be performed for service loads and
for the DBE and the MCE level earthquakes. Herein and for earthquake conditions, we
require that in both checks the end plates are “essentially elastic”. This is defined as
follows:
a) In the DBE, “essentially elastic” is defined as meeting the criteria of the AISC for
LRFD (American Institute of Steel Construction, 2001) using the minimum
material strengths and appropriate φ factors.
b) In the MCE, “essentially elastic” is defined as meeting the criteria of the AISC for
LRFD using the expected material strengths and unit φ factors. The expected
material strengths should be determined using the FEMA 356 (Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 2000) procedures or the contemporary
procedures of the American Institute of Steel Construction (2005). In case the
expected material strength cannot be determined, the minimum strength should be
used.
Axial load P is herein considered to be the factor load equal to either 1.25 D + 1.75 L for
service loading conditions or 1.25 D + SL + E load at displacement Δ under earthquake
loading conditions, where D is the dead load, SL is the seismic live load and E is the
earthquake load. Figure 7-1 illustrates the procedure for checking the end plate thickness.
The following steps should be followed given factored load P, displacement Δ and
bearing geometry per Figure 7-1:
a) Calculate the concrete design bearing strength:
fb = 1.7φc f c' (7-1)
In equation (7-1), factor 1.7 implies that the assumption of confined concrete was
made. It is achieved either by having a concrete area at least equal to twice the
48 Version 2, June 2007
Page 72 of 123
b1 − b
r=
2
4P
b1 = fb = 1.7φc f′c
πfb
⎛ b1 ⎞
⎜ b − 1⎟ A
⎝ ⎠
4Mu
Bending Moment in Plate, Mu t≥
fb A φbFy
r2 ⎛b ⎞ r2
Mu = fb A + fb ⎜ 1 − 1⎟ A
2 ⎝b ⎠3 ⎛b ⎞
fb ⎜ 1 − 1⎟ A
where A=1 ⎝ b ⎠
FIGURE 7-1 Double Concave Friction Pendulum Bearing and the Procedure for
End Plate Design
Page 73 of 123
area over which stress fb develops or by proper reinforcement of the concrete
pedestal.
b) Calculate diameter b1 of the area of concrete carrying load:
4P
b1 = (7-2)
π fb
c) Calculate the loading arm:
b1 − b
r= (7-3)
2
d) Calculate the required plate bending strength for unit plate length l = 1 :
r2 ⎛ b1 ⎞ r
2
M uSIMPLIFIED = fb + fb ⎜ − 1⎟ (7-4)
2 ⎝b ⎠ 3
Note that equation (7-4) accounts for the circular shape of the loaded area as
illustrated in Figure 7-1. However, equation (7-4) is based on a simplified
representation of plate bending that is valid for small values of ratio of the arm
r to slider diameter b . To investigate the error introduced an exact solution was
obtained for the bending moment under elastic conditions (Roark, 1954). The
solution is based on the representation shown in Figure 7-2 of a circular plate
built-in along the inner edge and uniformly loaded. The moment per unit length at
the built end is
⎛ b1 1 + 3ν 1 −ν ⎛ b ⎞
4
⎛b⎞ ⎞
2
⎜ (1 + ν ) ln − + ⎜ ⎟ +ν ⎜ ⎟ ⎟
2⎜ b 4 4 ⎝ b1 ⎠ ⎝ b1 ⎠ ⎟
M uEXACT = fb b1 ⎜ 2 ⎟ (7-5)
⎜ ⎛b⎞ ⎟
⎜ 8(1 + ν ) + 8(1 −ν ) ⎜ ⎟ ⎟
⎝ ⎝ 1⎠
b ⎠
where ν is the Poisson’s ratio. Figure 7-2 presents values of the moment
normalized by the product fbb12 as calculated by the simplified and the exact
theory for ν = 0.3 . The results of the two theories agree well for values of ratio
b / b1 that approach unity. The correction factor shown in Figure 7-2 is the ratio of
the moment calculated by the exact and the simplified theories. The factor may be
used in calculating the exact moment by multiplying the factor by the result of
equation (7-4).
e) Calculate the required plate thickness:
Page 74 of 123
Exact Simplified
b1
2
b1
A
b
b
2
b1 − b
2
M
M M
fb fb
fb
⎛b ⎞
fb ⎜ 1 − 1⎟
⎝b ⎠
1.0
0.8
0.6
Correction
2
_M_
fbb1
Factor
0.4
Simplified
Theory
0.2
Exact
Theory
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
_b_
b1
FIGURE 7-2 Comparison of Moment in End Plate Calculated by Exact and by

Simplified Theories and Correction Factor for ν=0.3
Page 75 of 123
4M u
t≥ (7-6)
φb Fy
where Fy is the yield stress of the plate material.
Parameters φc and φb are respectively equal to 0.65 and 0.9 for service load and DBE
conditions and are equal to unity for MCE conditions. Also, the thickness calculated by
equation (7-6) is compared with the available thickness which for concave plates is
dependent on the position of the slider. For service loading conditions and for building
applications, the slider is assumed centered. For service loading conditions and for bridge
applications in which the bearing undergoes displacement Δ is appropriate to consider
that the slider is off-center and the available thickness is calculated from the bearing
geometry. If the service displacement Δ is larger than one half the diameter of the slider
then is conservative to assume that the slider is at a location such that the available
thickness is the minimum. For seismic loading conditions is typically assumed that the
slider is at the position corresponding to the seismic displacement for either DBE or
MCE, depending on the condition checked.
The procedure outlined above may be modified as follows:
a) For cases with additional plates backing the bearing plate, the required bending
strength must be partitioned to the plates in proportion to their plastic strength,
that is, in proportion to Fy t 2 for each plate. Then equation (7-6) is used with the
portion of moment corresponding to the plate checked.
b) The effect of the lateral force acting at the slider concave plate interface may be
incorporated by the procedures outlines in DeWolf and Ricker (2000) for the case
of combined axial force and moment. Typically this moment, which does not
include any PΔ component, is small for the concave plate bearings (loading arm
is just the thickness of the plate, which is small) so that it can be neglected.
However, it may be of importance when checking the safety of the housing plate
of single concave bearings where the slider is at some distance from the plate to
concrete interface.
As an example consider the bearing of Figure 7-1. Concrete has strength

f c' = 27MPa = 4ksi and the factored load for service load conditions ( φc and φb are
respectively equal to 0.65 and 0.9) is P=6942kN=1560kip. The plate material is cast
ductile iron ASTM A536, grade 65-45-12 with minimum Fy = 311MPa = 45ksi .
Application is in a bridge with Δ = 150mm = 6in so that we assume that the available
plate thickness is the minimum thickness or 63.5mm=2.5in. Equation (7-1) gives
fb = 30.50MPa = 4.42ksi , equations (7-2) and (7-3) give b1 = 538.5mm = 21.2in and
r = 116.8mm = 4.6in . The correction factor is obtained for b / b1 = 12 / 21.2 = 0.57 from
Figure 7-2 as 0.87. The required strength is calculated from equation (7-4) after
multiplication by factor 0.87 as M u = 70.66 × 0.87 = 61.39kip-in/in (273.2kN-mm/mm)
and the required thickness from (7-6) is t ≥ 62.5mm = 2.46in . Since the available
thickness is 63.5mm=2.5in, the plate is safe.
Page 76 of 123
The procedure for design of sliding bearing end plates is based on strength and does not
consider any additional requirements for stiffness. The Engineer may want to impose
additional stiffness related criteria for the design of sliding bearings. Stiffness may be
required to prevent distortion of the bearing that will impair its proper functioning. For
example, the European Standard for Structural Bearings EN1337 (European, 2004) has
specific requirements that intend to prevent distortion of the sliding surface (a) as a result
of short-term and long-term deformation in the concrete and (b) during transport and
installation. Permanent deformations of the end plates are associated with comparable
deformations of the sliding surface that will result in increased wear.
Page 77 of 123
Reference:
Example of Shear Lug Design
ACI 318-08 Appendix D

Anchoring to Concrete
Friction Between Bearing and Structure

PCI Design Handbook
Table 6.6.1 and Section 6,6
Page 78 of 123
Page 79 of 123
Page 80 of 123
Page 81 of 123
Page 82 of 123
Page 83 of 123
Page 84 of 123
Page 85 of 123
Page 86 of 123
Page 87 of 123
Page 88 of 123
Page 89 of 123
Page 90 of 123
Page 91 of 123
Page 92 of 123
Page 93 of 123
Page 94 of 123
Page 95 of 123
Bearing Paint Information
Page 96 of 123
Protective COROTHANE® I GALVAPAC
& NSF® 1K ZINC PRIMER
Marine
Coatings NSF/ANSI
Certified to
61 B65G11 G RAY
Revised: May 9, 2013 5.14
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION RECOMMENDED USES

COROTHANE I GALVAPAC 1K ZINC PRIMER is a low VOC, • Immersion Service - potable water: Meets NSF Standard 61
moisture curing urethane zinc-rich primer. Designed for low tem- for use in potable water storage.
perature application to steel surfaces. • 250,000 gallon untopcoated
• Low temperature application - down to 20°F (-7°C) • 20,000 gallon minimum topcoated
• NSF approved to Standard 61 for potable water • Meets requirements of SSPC Paint Spec No. 40 for zinc rich
• Abrasion and chemical resistant moisture cure Urethane primer
• Easy to apply and recoat • As a primer in a urethane coating system for bridges, tanks,
• Usable for immersion service with recommended topcoated chemical, and marine structures
• Resistant to mudcracking • Ideal for priming water assisted abrasive blasted surfaces where
• Meets Class B requirements for Slip Coefficient and Creep Re- flash rusting or blooming limits the use of conventional zinc rich
sistance, .54 coatings
• Enhanced coating strength and edge protection with micaceous • Acceptable for use with cathodic protection with select topcoats
iron oxide addition • Conforms to AWWA D102 Inside Coating System #3 (ICS-3),
Inside Coating System #5 (ICS-5), Outside Coating System #2
PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS (OCS-2), Outside Coating System #3 (OCS-3), Outside Coating
System #4 (OCS-4), and Outside Coating System #6 (OCS-6)
Finish: Flat • A component of INFINITANK
Color: Gray
Volume Solids: 67% ± 2%
PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
Weight Solids: 91.7% ± 2% Substrate*: Steel
VOC (calculated): <340 g/L; 2.8 lb/gal Surface Preparation*: SSPC-SP5
Zinc Content in Dry Film: 83% ±2% by weight System Tested*:
Recommended Spreading Rate per coat: 1 ct. Corothane I GalvaPac 1K Zinc Primer @ 3.5 mils (88 microns) dft
Standard AWWA 1 ct. Corothane I MIO-Aluminum @ 3.0 mils (75 microns) dft
Min. Max. Min. Max. *unless otherwise noted below
Wet mils (microns) 4.5 112 6.8 170 3.0 75 6.0 150 Test Name Test Method Results
Dry mils (microns) 3.0 75 4.0 100 2.0 50 4.0* 100* ASTM D4060, CS17 wheel,
Abrasion Resistance 45 mg loss
1000 cycles, 1 kg load
~Coverage sq ft/gal (m2/L) 268 6.5 358 8.8 268 6.5 536 13.1
Theoretical coverage sq ft/ 1943 psi (ASTM
Adhesion
1072 (26.2) ASTM D4541; ASTM D3359 D4541); 5B (ASTM
gal (m2/L) @ 1 mil/25 micron dft (GalvaPac only)
D3359)
NOTE: Brush or roll application may require multiple coats to
achieve maximum film thickness and uniformity of appearance. Rating 10 per ASTM
*See Recommended Systems on reverse side ASTM D5894, 15 cycles, D610 Rusting (field);
Corrosion Weathering
Drying Schedule @ 5.0 mils wet (125 microns): 5000 hours Rating 10 per ASTM
D714 Blistering
@ 40°F/4.5°C @ 77°F/25°C @ 100°F/38°C
Direct Impact Resis-
50% RH ASTM G14 160 in. lb.
tance (Galva-Pac only)
To touch: 45 minutes 20 minutes 10 minutes
300°F (149°C)
To recoat (minimum), atmospheric service: Dry Heat Resistance ASTM D2485 continuous, 350°F
8 hours 4-6 hours 1 hour (177°C) intermittent
To recoat (minimum), immersion service: ASTM D522, 180° bend, 1/4"
Flexibility Passes
24 hours 12 hours 10 hours mandrel
To recoat (maximum): Immersion
Rating 10 per ASTM
D610 for Rusting;
12 months 12 months 12 months (Galvapac/2 cts 5 year potable water
Rating 10 per ASTM
To cure, atmospheric service: Macropoxy 646 NSF)
D714 for Blistering
5 days 3 days 1 day Moisture Rating 10 per ASTM
To cure, immersion service: Condensation ASTM D4585, 100°F (38°C), D610 for Rusting;
14 days 7 days 5 days Resistance 4000 hours Rating 10 per ASTM
(GalvaPac only) D714 for Blistering
If maximum recoat time is exceeded, abrade surface before recoating.
Drying time is temperature, humidity, and film thickness dependent. Pencil Hardness ASTM D3363 2H (zinc only)
For Potable Water Service, allow a minimum cure time of 7 days at 77°F Rating 10 per ASTM
(25°C) prior to placing in service. Sterilize and rinse per AWWA C652. Salt Fog Resistance D610 for Rusting;
ASTM B117, 5000 hours
(GalvaPac only) Rating 10 per ASTM
Shelf Life: 12 months, unopened D714 for Blistering
Store indoors at 40°F (4.5°C) to AISC Specification for Struc-
100°F (38°C). Slip Coefficient*
tural Joints Using ASTM A325
Class B, .54, tension
Flash Point: 94°F (34°C), PMCC (GalvaPac only) and creep <.005"
or ASTM A490 Bolts
Reducer/Clean Up: Reducer #15, R7K15 (or) Wet Heat Resistance Non-immersion 190°F (88°C)
Reducer #111,
R7K111 for non-NSF, VOC
exempt applications *Refer to Slip Certification document
www.sherwin-williams.com/protective
Page 97 of 123 continued on back
Marine
Coatings NSF/ANSI
Certified to
61 B65G11 G RAY
PRODUCT INFORMATION 5.14
RECOMMENDED SYSTEMS SURFACE PREPARATION

Dry Film Thickness / ct.
Mils (Microns) Surface must be clean, dry, and in sound condition. Remove all
Immersion Service (Potable Water),Steel: oil, dust, grease, dirt, loose rust, and other foreign material to
*AWWA D102: Inside Coating System No. 5 ensure adequate adhesion.
minimum AWWA 10.0 (250)
1 ct. Corothane I GalvaPac 1K Zinc Primer 2.0 (50) Refer to product Application Bulletin for detailed surface preparation in-
2 ct. Macropoxy 646 PW 4.0 (100) formation.
Immersion Services, Potable Water, Steel: Minimum recommended surface preparation:

1 ct. Corothane I GalvaPac 1K Zinc Primer 3.0-4.0 (75-100) Iron & Steel
2 cts. Macropoxy 646 PW 5.0-10.0 (125-250) Atmospheric: SSPC-SP6, 2 mil (50 micron)
profile preferred
Immersion, with recommended topcoat:
Immersion Service (Non-Potable Water),Steel: SSPC-SP10/NACE 2, 2 mil profile
1 ct. Corothane I GalvaPac 1K Zinc Primer 3.0-4.0 (75-100)
2 cts. Corothane I Coal Tar 5.0-7.0 (125-175) Surface Preparation Standards
Condition of ISO 8501-1 Swedish Std.
Surface BS7079:A1 SIS055900 SSPC NACE
Atmospheric Service,Steel: White Metal Sa 3 Sa 3 SP 5 1
*AWWA D102 Outside Coating System No.2 Near White Metal Sa 2.5 Sa 2.5 SP 10 2
Commercial Blast Sa 2 Sa 2 SP 6 3
minimum AWWA 7.5 (188) Brush-Off Blast Sa 1 Sa 1 SP 7 4
1 ct. Corothane I GalvaPac 1K Zinc Primer 3.0 (75) Hand Tool Cleaning Rusted
Pitted & Rusted
C St 2
D St 2
C St 2
D St 2
SP 2
SP 2
-
-
1 ct. Corothane Ironox B 3.0 (75) Power Tool Cleaning Rusted
Pitted & Rusted
C St 3
D St 3
C St 3
D St 3
SP 3
SP 3
-
-
1 ct. Corothane I HS 1.5 (40)
*AWWA D102: Outside Coating System No. 6 TINTING

minimum AWWA 6.0 (150)
Do not tint.
1 ct. Corothane I GalvaPac 1K Zinc Primer 2.0 (50)
1 ct. Macropoxy 646 NSF 2.0 (50)
1 ct Acrolon 218HS 2.0 (50) APPLICATION CONDITIONS
Temperature:
Steel: Rapid Return to Service air and surface 20°F (-7°C) minimum, 120°F (49°C)
1 ct. Corothane I GalvaPac 1K Zinc Primer 3.0-4.0 (75-100) maximum
1 ct. Fast Clad Urethane 6.0-9.0 (150-225) material: 45°F (7°C) minimum
Do not apply over surface ice

Acceptable for use over Zinc Clad PCP Ultra. Topcoat required.
Relative humidity: 30% minimum, 99% maximum
Refer to product Application Bulletin for detailed application information.
ORDERING INFORMATION
The systems listed above are representative of the product's use, Packaging: 3 gallon (11.3L) container
other systems may be appropriate.
Weight: 28.5 ± 0.2 lb/gal ; 3.42 Kg/L
SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
Refer to the MSDS sheet before use.
Published technical data and instructions are subject to change without notice.
Contact your Sherwin-Williams representative for additional technical data and
instructions.
WARRANTY
DISCLAIMER The Sherwin-Williams Company warrants our products to be free of manufactur-
The information and recommendations set forth in this Product Data Sheet are ing defects in accord with applicable Sherwin-Williams quality control procedures.
based upon tests conducted by or on behalf of The Sherwin-Williams Company. Liability for products proven defective, if any, is limited to replacement of the defec-
Such information and recommendations set forth herein are subject to change and tive product or the refund of the purchase price paid for the defective product as
pertain to the product offered at the time of publication. Consult your Sherwin- determined by Sherwin-Williams. NO OTHER WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE
Williams representative to obtain the most recent Product Data Information and OF ANY KIND IS MADE BY SHERWIN-WILLIAMS, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,
Application Bulletin. STATUTORY, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING MER-
CHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Page 98 of 123
Marine
Coatings NSF/ANSI
Certified to
61 B65G11 G RAY
Revised: May 9, 2013 APPLICATION BULLETIN 5.14
SURFACE PREPARATIONS APPLICATION CONDITIONS

Temperature:
Surface must be clean, dry, and in sound condition. Remove all air and surface 20°F (-7°C) minimum, 120°F (49°C)
oil, dust, grease, dirt, loose rust, and other foreign material to maximum
material: 45°F (7°C) minimum
ensure adequate adhesion.
Do not apply over surface ice
Iron & Steel (immersion service)
Remove all oil and grease from surface by Solvent Cleaning per Relative humidity: 30% minimum, 99% maximum
SSPC-SP1. Minimum surface preparation is Near White Metal Blast
Cleaning per SSPC-SP10/NACE 2. Blast clean all surfaces using APPLICATION EQUIPMENT
a sharp, angular abrasive for optimum surface profile (2 mils / 50
microns). Remove all weld spatter and round all sharp edges by The following is a guide. Changes in pressures and tip sizes may
grinding. Prime any bare steel the same day as it is cleaned or be needed for proper spray characteristics. Always purge spray
before flash rusting occurs. equipment before use with listed reducer. Any reduction must be
compliant with existing VOC regulations and compatible with the
Iron & Steel (atmospheric service) existing environmental and application conditions.
Remove all oil and grease from surface by Solvent Cleaning per
SSPC-SP1. Minimum surface preparation is Commercial Blast Reducer/Clean Up ........... Reducer #15, R7K15 (or) Reducer
Cleaning per SSPC-SP6. For better performance, use Near White #111, R7K111 for non-NSF, VOC ex-
Metal Blast Cleaning per SSPC-SP10/NACE 2. Blast clean all sur- empt applications
faces using a sharp, angular abrasive for optimum surface profile Airless Spray
(2 mils / 50 microns). Prime any bare steel the same day as it is Pump..............................30:1
cleaned or before flash rusting occurs. Pressure.........................2500 - 3000 psi
Hose...............................1/4" ID
Tip ...................................017" - .019"
Filter ...............................60 mesh
Reduction .......................As needed up to 10% by volume
Conventional Spray
Unit.................................Graco Binks
Gun ................................900 95
Fluid Nozzle ...................070 66/65
Air Nozzle.......................947 66PR
Atomization Pressure .....60-70 psi 60-70 psi
Fluid Pressure ................15-20 psi 15-20 psi
Brush
Brush..............................Natural bristle
Roller
Cover .............................3/8" natural or synthetic with
solvent resistant core
Surface Preparation Standards

Condition of ISO 8501-1 Swedish Std. If specific application equipment is not listed above, equivalent
White Metal Sa 3 Sa 3 SP 5 1 equipment may be substituted.
Near White Metal Sa 2.5 Sa 2.5 SP 10 2
Commercial Blast Sa 2 Sa 2 SP 6 3
Brush-Off Blast Sa 1 Sa 1 SP 7 4
Rusted
Hand Tool Cleaning Pitted & Rusted DC St 2 C St 2 SP 2 -
St 2 D St 2 SP 2 -
Power Tool Cleaning Rusted C St 3
Pitted & Rusted D St 3
C St 3
D St 3
SP 3
SP 3
-
-
Marine
Coatings NSF/ANSI
Certified to
61 B65G11 G RAY
APPLICATION BULLETIN 5.14
APPLICATION PROCEDURES PERFORMANCE TIPS

Stripe coat all crevices, welds, and sharp angles to prevent early
Surface preparation must be completed as indicated. failure in these areas.
Mix material thoroughly prior to use with a low speed power agita- Spreading rates are calculated on volume solids and do not include
tor until completely uniform. After mixing, pour through a 50 mesh an application loss factor due to surface profile, roughness or po-
filter. rosity of the surface, skill and technique of the applicator, method
of application, various surface irregularities, material lost during
Apply paint at the recommended film thickness and spreading mixing, spillage, overthinning, climatic conditions, and excessive
rate as indicated below: film build.
Recommended Spreading Rate per coat:
Standard AWWA Excessive reduction of material can affect film build, appearance,
Min. Max. Min. Max. and adhesion.
Wet mils (microns) 4.5 112 6.8 170 3.0 75 6.0 150
In order to avoid blockage of spray equipment, clean equipment
Dry mils (microns) 3.0 75 4.0 100 2.0 50 4.0* 100* before use or before periods of extended downtime with Reducer
~Coverage sq ft/gal (m2/L) 268 6.5 358 8.8 268 6.5 536 13.1 #15, R7K15 or R7K111.
Theoretical coverage sq ft/
1072 (26.2)
gal (m2/L) @ 1 mil/25 micron dft Pour a small amount of Reducer #15, R7K15 or R7K111 over the
NOTE: Brush or roll application may require multiple coats to top of the paint in the can to prevent skinning or gelling.
achieve maximum film thickness and uniformity of appearance.
*See Recommended Systems on reverse side
Place a temporary cover over the pail to keep excessive moisture,
Drying Schedule @ 5.0 mils wet (125 microns): condensation, fog, or rain from contaminating the coating.
@ 40°F/4.5°C @ 77°F/25°C @ 100°F/38°C
50% RH It is recommended that partially used cans not be sealed/closed
To touch: 45 minutes 20 minutes 10 minutes for use at a later date.
To recoat (minimum), atmospheric service:
An intermediate coat is recommended to provide a uniform ap-
8 hours 4-6 hours 1 hour pearance of the topcoat.
To recoat (minimum), immersion service:
24 hours 12 hours 10 hours Not for use with cathodic protection except as indicated under the
To recoat (maximum): recommended systems.
12 months 12 months 12 months
Corothane I KA Accelerator is acceptable for use (except NSF ap-
To cure, atmospheric service:
plications). See data page 5.98 for details.
5 days 3 days 1 day
To cure, immersion service:
14 days 7 days 5 days
Drying time is temperature, humidity, and film thickness dependent.
For Potable Water Service, allow a minimum cure time of 7 days at 77°F
(25°C) prior to placing in service. Sterilize and rinse per AWWA C652.
Application of coating above maximum or below minimum Refer to Product Information sheet for additional performance
recommended spreading rate may adversely affect coating characteristics and properties.
performance.
SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
CLEAN UP INSTRUCTIONS Published technical data and instructions are subject to change without notice.
Clean spills and spatters immediately with Reducer #15, R7K15 Contact your Sherwin-Williams representative for additional technical data and
or R7K111. Clean tools immediately after use with Reducer #15, instructions.
R7K15 or R7K111. Follow manufacturer's safety recommendations
when using any solvent. WARRANTY
The Sherwin-Williams Company warrants our products to be free of manufacturing
DISCLAIMER defects in accord with applicable Sherwin-Williams quality control procedures.
The information and recommendations set forth in this Product Data Sheet are Liability for products proven defective, if any, is limited to replacement of the de-
based upon tests conducted by or on behalf of The Sherwin-Williams Company. fective product or the refund of the purchase price paid for the defective product
Such information and recommendations set forth herein are subject to change and as determined by Sherwin-Williams. NO OTHER WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE
pertain to the product offered at the time of publication. Consult your Sherwin- OF ANY KIND IS MADE BY SHERWIN-WILLIAMS, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,
Williams representative to obtain the most recent Product Data Information and STATUTORY, BY OPERATION OF LAW OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING MER-
Application Bulletin. CHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Page 100 of 123
Protective COROTHANE® I HS
& ALIPHATIC FINISH COAT
Marine B65W50 Ultra White B65W51 Extra White Base
Coatings B65T54 Ultradeep Base
B65R50 Safety Red
B65B50
B65Y50
Black
Safety Yellow
Revised June 25, 2015 5.12
Product Description Recommended Uses

Corothane I HS is a single component, moisture curing urethane • Color coat where maximum color and gloss retention are required
designed for low temperature or high humidity applications while • Suitable for use in the following industries:
providing UV resistance and chemical resistance equivalent to two
• Marine • Petro-Chemical
part urethane coatings.
• Industrial • Pulp and Paper
• Low temperature application - down to 20°F (-7°C)
• Bridge and Highway • Rail
• Superior resistance to yellowing, chalking, or degradation by
• Water and Waste Water
sunlight
• Superior adhesion to most prepared surfaces • Suitable for use in USDA inspected facilities.
• Superior abrasion resistance • Acceptable for use in Canadian Food Processing facilities
• Outstanding chemical resistance categories: D1, D2, D3 (Confirm acceptance of specific part numbers/rexes
• Outstanding application properties with your SW Sales Representative)
• Conforms to AWWA D102-03 OCS #2
• Meets requirements of SSPC Paint 38, Level II
Product Characteristics
Finish: Gloss Performance Characteristics
Color: Wide range of colors available Substrate*: Steel
Volume Solids: 61% ± 1%, may vary by color Surface Preparation*: SSPC-SP6
System Tested*:
Weight Solids: 77% ± 2% 1 ct. Corothane I MIO-Aluminum @ 3.0 mils (75 microns) dft
1 ct. Corothane I HS @ 3.0 mils (75 microns) dft
VOC (EPA Method 24): Unreduced: <310 g/L; 2.60 lb/gal *unless otherwise noted below
Reduced 5%: <340 g/L; 2.80 lb/gal
Test Name Test Method Results
Recommended Spreading Rate per coat:
ASTM D4060, CS17
Minimum Maximum Abrasion
wheel, 1000 cycles, 80 mg loss
Resistance
Wet mils (microns) 3.5 (88) 5.0 (125) 1 kg load
Dry mils (microns) 2.0 (50) 3.0 (75) Adhesion ASTM D4541 1296 psi
~Coverage sq ft/gal (m2/L) 326 (8.0) 489 (12.0) Rating 10 per ASTM
Theoretical coverage sq ft/gal Corrosion ASTM D5984, 12 D610 Rusting; Rating
(m2/L) @ 1 mil / 25 microns dft 976 (23.9)
Weathering cycles, 4032 hours 10 per ASTM D714
NOTE: Brush or roll application may require multiple coats to Blistering
achieve maximum film thickness and uniformity of appearance. Direct Impact,
ASTM D2794 70 in lb
topcoat only
Drying Schedule @ 4.0 mils wet (100 microns): Dry Heat Resistance ASTM D2485 250°F (121°C)
@ 40°F/4.5°C @ 77°F/25°C @ 100°F/38°C Flexibility, ASTM D522, 180°
50% RH Passes
topcoat only bend, 1/8" mandrel
To touch: 4 hours 2 hours 45 minutes Rating 10 per ASTM
To recoat: ASTM-D4585, 1000 D610 for Rusting;
Humidity
minimum: 24 hours 12 hours 6 hours hours Rating 10 per ASTM
maximum: 14 days 14 days 14 days D714 for Blistering
To cure: 7 days 3 days 3 days Pencil Hardness ASTM D3363 HB
If maximum recoat time is exceeded, abrade surface before recoating. Rating 10 per ASTM
Drying time is temperature, humidity, and film thickness dependent. ASTM B117, 1000 D610 for Rusting;
Salt Fog Resistance
Shelf Life: 12 months, unopened hours Rating 10 per ASTM
Store indoors at 40°F (4.5°C) to D714 for Blistering
100°F (38°C). Passes, no cracking,
(Tinted colors must be used within ASTM D2246, 15 checking, or blistering;
Thermal Cycling
7 days after tinting) cycles no loss of adhesion,
Flash Point: 101°F (39°C), Seta Flash 100% gloss retention
Reducer/Clean Up: Reducer #15, R7K15, R7K100,
or R7K111 (VOC exempt) Meets requirements of SSPC Paint 38, Level II.
B65R50 Safety Red
B65B50
B65Y50
Black
Safety Yellow
Revised June 25, 2015 Product Information 5.12
Recommended Systems Surface Preparation

Dry Film Thickness / ct.
Mils (Microns) Surface must be clean, dry, and in sound condition. Remove all
Steel: oil, dust, grease, dirt, loose rust, and other foreign material to
1 ct. Corothane I MIO-Aluminum 2.0-3.0 (50-75) ensure adequate adhesion.
1 ct. Corothane I Ironox B 3.0-5.0 (75-125)
1 ct. Corothane I HS 2.0-3.0 (50-75) Refer to product Application Bulletin for detailed surface prepara-
tion information.
Steel:
1 ct. Corothane I MIO-Aluminum 2.0-3.0 (50-75) Minimum recommended surface preparation:
1-2 cts. Corothane I HS 2.0-3.0 (50-75) *Iron & Steel: SSPC-SP6/NACE 3
*Concrete & Masonry: SSPC-SP13/NACE 6, or ICRI
Steel: No. 310.2R, CSP 1-3
1 ct. Corothane I GalvaPac Zinc Primer 3.0-4.0 (75-100) *Previously Painted SSPC-SP2 or SP3
1 ct. Corothane I Ironox B 3.0-5.0 (75-125) *Primer required
1 ct. Corothane I HS 2.0-3.0 (50-75) Condition of ISO 8501-1 Swedish Std.
Steel: White Metal Sa 3 Sa 3 SP 5 1
1 ct. Corothane I PrePrime 1.0-1.5 (25-40) Commercial Blast Sa 2 Sa 2 SP 6 3
1 ct. Corothane I MIO-Aluminum 2.0-3.0 (50-75) Rusted
Hand Tool Cleaning Pitted C St 2 C St 2 SP 2 -
1 ct. Corothane I Ironox B 3.0-5.0 (75-125) & Rusted D St 2 D St 2 SP 2 -
Rusted
Power Tool Cleaning Pitted C St 3 C St 3 SP 3 -
1 ct. Corothane I HS 2.0-3.0 (50-75) & Rusted D St 3 D St 3 SP 3 -
Steel (Epoxy Primer): Tinting

1 ct. Dura-Plate 235 4.0-8.0 (100-200)
1-2 cts. Corothane I HS Coat 2.0-3.0 (50-75) Tint B65W51 and B65T54 only with Maxitoner colorants, 100% tint
strength. Must be used within 7 days after tinting.
Concrete, smooth:
1 ct. Corothane I PrePrime 1.0-1.5 (25-40) Application Conditions
1 ct. Corothane I HS 2.0-3.0 (50-75) Temperature:
air and surface: 20°F (-7°C) minimum, 100°F (38°C)
Concrete, rough: maximum
On deeply profiled or damaged concrete floor: material: 45°F (7°C) minimum
1 ct. Kem Cati-Coat HS Epoxy Filler/Sealer 10.0-20.0 (250-500) Do not apply over surface ice
as required to fill voids and provide a continuous substrate. Relative humidity: 30% minimum, 99% maximum
1 ct. Corothane I HS 2.0-3.0 (50-75)
Refer to product Application Bulletin for detailed application infor-
Previously Painted Surfaces: mation.
Spot prime bare steel with 1 coat of Corothane I GalvaPac Zinc Primer
1 ct. Corothane I HS 2.0-3.0 (50-75) Ordering Information
or Packaging: 1 gallon (3.78L) and 5 gallon (18.9L)
1 ct. Corothane I Ironox B 3.0-5.0 (75-125) containers
1 ct. Corothane I HS 2.0-3.0 (50-75)
(Check compatibility) Weight: 11.79 ± 0.2 lb/gal ; 1.4 Kg/L
may vary by color
Safety Precautions
Published technical data and instructions are subject to change without notice.
The systems listed above are representative of the product's use, Contact your Sherwin-Williams representative for additional technical data and
instructions.
other systems may be appropriate.
Warranty
Disclaimer The Sherwin-Williams Company warrants our products to be free of manufactur-
ing defects in accord with applicable Sherwin-Williams quality control procedures.
The information and recommendations set forth in this Product Data Sheet are Liability for products proven defective, if any, is limited to replacement of the defec-
based upon tests conducted by or on behalf of The Sherwin-Williams Company. tive product or the refund of the purchase price paid for the defective product as
Such information and recommendations set forth herein are subject to change and determined by Sherwin-Williams. NO OTHER WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE
Page 102 of 123
B65R50 Safety Red
B65B50
B65Y50
Black
Safety Yellow
Revised June 25, 2015 Application Bulletin 5.12
Surface Preparations Application Conditions

Temperature:
Surface must be clean, dry, and in sound condition. Remove all air and surface: 20°F (-7°C) minimum, 100°F (38°C)
maximum
oil, dust, grease, dirt, loose rust, and other foreign material to material: 45°F (7°C) minimum
ensure adequate adhesion. Do not apply over surface ice
Iron & Steel Relative humidity: 30% minimum, 99% maximum

Remove all oil and grease from surface by Solvent Cleaning per
SSPC-SP1. Minimum surface preparation is Commercial Blast Application Equipment
Cleaning per SSPC-SP6/NACE 3. For better performance, use
Near White Metal Blast Cleaning per SSPC-SP10/ NACE 2. Blast The following is a guide. Changes in pressures and tip sizes may
clean all surfaces using a sharp, angular abrasive for optimum be needed for proper spray characteristics. Always purge spray
surface profile (2 mils / 50 microns). Prime any bare steel the same
equipment before use with listed reducer. Any reduction must be
day as it is cleaned.
compliant with existing VOC regulations and compatible with the
Concrete and Masonry existing environmental and application conditions.
For surface preparation, refer to SSPC-SP13/NACE 6, or ICRI No.
310.2R, CSP 1-3. Surfaces should be thoroughly clean and dry. Reducer/Clean Up
Concrete and mortar must be cured at least 28 days @ 75°F (24°C). Brush/Roll ��Reducer #15, R7K15
Remove all loose mortar and foreign material. Surface must be Spray ��Aromatic 100 Reducer, R2K5
free of laitance, concrete dust, dirt, form release agents, moisture VOC exempt ��R7K111
curing membranes, loose cement and hardeners. Fill bug holes, air
pockets and other voids with Steel-Seam FT910. Primer required. Airless Spray
Pump ��30:1
Follow the standard methods listed below when applicable: Pressure ��1800 - 2000 psi
ASTM D4258 Standard Practice for Cleaning Concrete. Hose ��1/4" ID
ASTM D4259 Standard Practice for Abrading Concrete.
Tip ��.011" - .015"
ASTM D4260 Standard Practice for Etching Concrete.
ASTM F1869 Standard Test Method for Measuring Moisture Vapor Filter ��60 mesh
Emission Rate of Concrete. Reduction ��As needed up to 5% by volume
SSPC-SP 13/Nace 6 Surface Preparation of Concrete.
ICRI No. 310.2R Concrete Surface Preparation. Conventional Spray
Unit ��Graco Binks
Previously Painted Surfaces Gun ��900 95
If in sound condition, clean the surface of all foreign material. Fluid Nozzle ��070 66/65
Smooth, hard or glossy coatings and surfaces should be dulled by Air Nozzle ��947 66PR
abrading the surface. Apply a test area, allowing paint to dry one Atomization Pressure ��60-70 psi 60-70 psi
week before testing adhesion. If adhesion is poor, or if this product Fluid Pressure ��15-20 psi 15-20 psi
attacks the previous finish, removal of the previous coating may be Reduction ��As needed up to 5% by volume
necessary. If paint is peeling or badly weathered, clean surface to
sound substrate and treat as a new surface as above.
Brush
Brush ��Natural bristle
Reduction ��As needed up to 5% by volume
Roller
Cover ��1/4" natural or synthetic with
solvent resistant core
Reduction ��As needed up to 5% by volume
Condition of ISO 8501-1 Swedish Std.
White Metal Sa 3 Sa 3 SP 5 1 If specific application equipment is not listed above, equivalent
Commercial Blast Sa 2 Sa 2 SP 6 3 equipment may be substituted.
Rusted
Hand Tool Cleaning Pitted C St 2 C St 2 SP 2 -
& Rusted D St 2 D St 2 SP 2 -
Rusted
Power Tool Cleaning Pitted C St 3 C St 3 SP 3 -
& Rusted D St 3 D St 3 SP 3 -
B65R50 Safety Red
B65B50
B65Y50
Black
Safety Yellow
Revised June 25, 2015 Application Bulletin 5.12
Application Procedures Performance Tips

Stripe coat all crevices, welds, and sharp angles to prevent early
Surface preparation must be completed as indicated. failure in these areas.
When using spray application, use a 50% overlap with each pass
Mix paint thoroughly prior to use with a low speed power agitator. of the gun to avoid holidays, bare areas, and pinholes. If necessary,
Filter slowly through a 55 mesh screen. cross spray at a right angle.
Apply paint at the recommended film thickness and spreading Spreading rates are calculated on volume solids and do not include
rate as indicated below: an application loss factor due to surface profile, roughness or po-
rosity of the surface, skill and technique of the applicator, method
of application, various surface irregularities, material lost during
Recommended Spreading Rate per coat: mixing, spillage, overthinning, climatic conditions, and excessive
Minimum Maximum film build.
Wet mils (microns) 3.5 (88) 5.0 (125) Excessive reduction of material can affect film build, appearance,
Dry mils (microns) 2.0 (50) 3.0 (75) and adhesion.
~Coverage sq ft/gal (m2/L) 326 (8.0) 489 (12.0) In order to avoid blockage of spray equipment, clean equipment
Theoretical coverage sq ft/gal before use or before periods of extended downtime with Reducer
(m2/L) @ 1 mil / 25 microns dft 976 (23.9) #15, R7K15.
NOTE: Brush or roll application may require multiple coats to Pour a small amount of Reducer #15, R7K15 over the top of the
achieve maximum film thickness and uniformity of appearance. paint in the can to prevent skinning or gelling.
Drying Schedule @ 4.0 mils wet (100 microns): Place a temporary cover over the pail to keep excessive moisture,
condensation, fog, or rain from contaminating the coating.
@ 40°F/4.5°C @ 77°F/25°C @ 100°F/38°C
50% RH Do not exceed recommended dry film thickness.
To touch: 4 hours 2 hours 45 minutes
When applying Corothane I - HS over dark colors, Corothane I Zinc
To recoat: Primers, or porous surfaces, an intermediate coat or a minimum
minimum: 24 hours 12 hours 6 hours of 2 finish coats is required for adequate hide and uniformity of
maximum: 14 days 14 days 14 days appearance.
To cure: 7 days 3 days 3 days Tinted colors must be used within 7 days after tinting.
Drying time is temperature, humidity, and film thickness dependent. E-Z Roll Urethane Defoamer is acceptable for use. See data page
5.99 for details.
Application of coating above maximum or below minimum Corothane KA Accelerator is acceptable for use. See data page
recommended spreading rate may adversely affect coating 5.98 for details.
performance.
It is recommend that partially used cans not be sealed/closed for
use at a later date.
Do not shake beyond two minutes.
Refer to Product Information sheet for additional performance

characteristics and properties.
Safety Precautions
Clean Up Instructions Published technical data and instructions are subject to change without notice.
Contact your Sherwin-Williams representative for additional technical data and
Clean spills and spatters immediately with Reducer #15, R7K15. Clean tools
instructions.
immediately after use with Reducer #15, R7K15. Follow manufacturer's
safety recommendations when using any solvent.
Warranty
Disclaimer The Sherwin-Williams Company warrants our products to be free of manufacturing
defects in accord with applicable Sherwin-Williams quality control procedures.
The information and recommendations set forth in this Product Data Sheet are Liability for products proven defective, if any, is limited to replacement of the de-
based upon tests conducted by or on behalf of The Sherwin-Williams Company. fective product or the refund of the purchase price paid for the defective product
Such information and recommendations set forth herein are subject to change and as determined by Sherwin-Williams. NO OTHER WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE
Page 104 of 123
Fire-Rating Calculations
Page 105 of 123

Fire Rating Calculations
The Fire Rating Calculations for the Isolators following fire-rating calulations for concrete
protected steel columns per section 721.5.1-4 of 2006 International Building Code as verified by fire
testing of full-scale triple pendulum bearing are presented herein.
See Pages 197 of 452 to 212 of 452 in "EPS Qualifications Document, December 2014"
The Triple Pendulum Bearings are made of steel and support column loads. Thus they are treated as
short steel columns. For the bearings, the equivalent steel properties using Eqn 7-14 of
2006 IBC are:
For FPT15656/32-32/22-11 W= 5385 lb/ft

D= 69 in.
For FPT15651/26-20R/19-12 W= 4406 lb/ft

D= 60 in.
For FPT15646/22-20/16-8 W= 3831 lb/ft

D= 50 in.
For FPT15641/16-12R/12-7 W= 3151 lb/ft

D= 38 in.
For FPT15636/10-8R/8-5 W= 2746 lb/ft

D= 25 in.
Assuming zero concrete cover thickness. Eqn 7-14 reduces to

Ro = 10 (W/D)^0.7
where
Ro = Fire Endurance (minutes) at zero moisture content
W = weight (lb/ft) of steel
D = Perimeter in inches of steel supporting column load
For FPT15656/32-32/22-11
Ro = 211 minutes Fire Rating = 3.5 Hours
For FPT15651/26-20R/19-12
For FPT15646/22-20/16-8
For FPT15641/16-12R/12-7
For FPT15636/10-8R/8-5
Page 106 of 123

Page 107 of 123
E
P Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc .
S
451 Azuar Drive, Bldg. 759, Mare Island, Vallejo, Calif ornia 94592
Tel: (707) 644-5993 Fax: (707) 644-5995
FIRE-RATING OF
FRICTION PENDULUM BEARINGS
Prepared by:
Earthquake Protection Systems

451 Azuar Drive, Mare Island,
Vallejo, CA 94592
February 20, 2014
Page 108 of 123

E
P Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc .
S
451 Azuar Drive, Bldg. 759, Mare Island, Vallejo, Calif ornia 94592
Tel: (707) 644-5993 Fax: (707) 644-5995
FIRE RESISTANCE OF FRICTION PENDULUM BEARINGS
The 2006 International Building Code (IBC), Section 720 “Prescriptive Fire Resistance” includes
prescriptive provisions for calculating fire-resistance rating of various building elements. Section
720.5.1.4 of the 2006 IBC includes provisions for calculating fire-resistance rating of steel columns
protected with concrete cover. Significant portion of the IBC Section 720 provisions have been
based on the work of Professor James A. Mike, Department of Fire Protection Engineering at
University of Maryland. His research focused on analytical methods for evaluating fire-resistance of
structural members, including unprotected steel columns. See Chapter 4 from the SFPE Handbook
of Fire Protection Engineering, Third Edition, 2002.
Friction Pendulum bearings are made of steel and support building column loads. Thus, they are
treated as short steel columns. Following the IBC prescriptive calculations for fire-resistance rating
of Friction Pendulum bearings using equation 7-14 in Section 720.5.1.4 with zero concrete cover
thickness for steel columns, it is observed that Friction Pendulum bearings have typical fire-rating
exceeding 4 hrs. Typical requirement for fire rating of structural members are only 2 hrs or 3 hrs.
In December of 2013, EPS performed actual fire testing of a Triple Pendulum bearing at the
Southwest Research Institute fire-testing laboratory in San Antonia to determine the bearings actual
fire-rating in accordance with the standard ASTN E119 fire-rating testing procedures. It was
observed that the fire rating as calculated with the IBC 2006 Section 720, Eon 7-14 is within 5% of
the fire rating as determined by actual fire-testing following ASTM E119 procedures. See attached.
To date EPS has supplied over 10,000 Friction Pendulum bearings in over 24 countries for
buildings, bridges, and industrial applications and not a single bearing have added fire-protection
measure. All industrial applications are fire-critical, and the regulatory authorities have agreed with
the EPS IBC fire-resistance rating evaluation of Friction Pendulum bearings.
Page 109 of 123

Fire Rating of Triple Pendulum Bearing: FPT8844/12-12/8-6
Triple Pendulum Bearing & Stub Column After 6 hrs of ASTM E119 Time-Temperature
above with 4-hr Fire-Rating Protection in Fire Exposure
Furnace at SWRI Laboratory, San Antonia,
Texas, USA
Fire-Rating of FPT8846/12-12/8-6:
 From Actual Fire-Test at SWRI 5 hrs 24 min
 From 2006 IBC Section 721.5.1.4

Calculations for Concrete Protected Steel
Column with Zero Concrete Thickness 5 hrs 40 min
After 5 hrs 40 min of ASTM E119 Time-Temperature fire exposure, the 4-hr fire protected steel
column recorded temperature readings of over 2000 Deg. F compared to 1200 Deg. F readings at the
core of unprotected Triple Pendulum bearing.
Page 110 of 123

Page 111 of 123
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the test described in this report was to evaluate the ability of a triple pendulum
bearing used as a foundation damper to resist thermal transmission when exposed to the furnace conditions
of ASTM E119, Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials.
TEST METHOD
The ASTM E119 test method is intended to evaluate the duration for which assemblies will
contain a fire, retain structural integrity, and/or prevent thermal transmission to the unexposed surface of
the specimen, or display all these properties dependent upon the type of assembly involved, during a
predestined fire exposure time. The test exposes a specimen to a standard fire controlled to achieve
specified temperatures throughout a specified period. For this test, steel temperature is monitored and is
the basis for establishing the fire resistance rating.
The bearing evaluated in this program is not explicitly covered as a type of test specimen in the
ASTM E119 test standard. Therefore, the acceptance criteria for steel columns were used as a basis for
evaluating the triple pendulum bearing. This criterion can be found in Sections 8.5.5 and 8.9.5 of ASTM
E119 and states that no point temperature measurement point shall register a temperature in excess of
1200 °F. The criterion was modified such that the average of the temperature measurements in the core of
the bearing would not be allowed to exceed 1200 °F. The minimum duration of the fire resistance test was
specified as 4 hr, and if the average temperature at the core of the bearing was not in excess of 1200 °F at
that time, the test would be continued until such temperatures were recorded.
This standard is used to measure and describe the response of materials, products, or assemblies to
heat and flame under controlled laboratory conditions, but does not by itself incorporate all factors required
for fire hazard or fire risk assessment of the materials, products, or assemblies under actual fire conditions.
This report describes the test results obtained for a triple pendulum bearing assembly. The
performance of the assembly is expressed in terms of the transmission of heat and hot gases during the
standard fire exposure. The results presented in this report apply specifically to the materials tested, in the
manner tested, and not to the entire production of these or similar materials, nor to the performance when
used in combination with other materials.
TEST ASSEMBLIES
Sample Description
The triple bearing pendulum was delivered to SwRI on November 19, 2013. The Client identified
the triple pendulum bearing as FPT8844/12-12/8-6.
The bearing had dimensions of 4 ft 6 in. × 4 ft 6 in. × 3 ft 3 in. tall, and weighed 6500 lb. The
bearing consisted of two halves that had a rubber seal around the perimeter. The bearing had 2-in. thick
A36 steel top and bottom plates. The bearing had a section of W10×60 I-beam welded perpendicular to the
top surface to replicate the building structural connection.
The top and bottom plates, as well as the beam section on the top plate were covered in five layers
of 5/8-in. thick Type ‘X’ gypsum with all joints at the corners staggered.
The sample was delivered with six inconel sheathed thermocouples preinstalled on the bearing.
Four thermocouples were installed at the core of the bearing, and two thermocouples were installed on the
I-beam section on the top plate of the bearing with one attached to the web and one attached to the flange
of the I-beam.
Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. 2 SwRI Project No.: 01.19577.01.402
Page 112 of 123

TEST RESULTS
Test Date: November 21, 2013
Test Witnesses: Dr. Anoop Mokha, and Messrs. Paolo Diaz, Eric Ko, and Ronald Alamedia,
representing Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc.
Instrumentation: The sample was delivered with six inconel sheathed thermocouples preinstalled on
the bearing. Four thermocouples were installed at the core of the bearing, and two
thermocouples were installed on the I-beam section on the top plate of the bearing
with one attached to the web and one attached to the flange of the I-beam. The
thermocouples on the beam section on the top face of the bearing were included for
informational purposes only and were not included in the pass/fail criteria of the
bearing. Thermocouple locations are shown in Figure A-1 in Appendix A.
Load: None.
Hose Stream Test: Not applicable to this type of test specimen.
Rating Obtained: 5 hr 24 min
Results: Table 1 summarizes the thermocouples locations and times at which they exceeded
the 1200 °F limit.
Table 1. Temperature Rise Summary.
TC Time to Exceed 1200 °F
Location
No. (hr:min:s)
1 IS-Bottom (Bearing Core) 5:04:10
2 IS-Center (Bearing Core) 5:40:40
3 IS-Top (Bearing Core) 5:42:00
4 SC-Top (Bearing Core) 5:36:40
1–4 Temperature Average 5:24:40
5 Column Web 3:47:50
6 Column Flange 3:40:50
The acquired data is located in Appendix B in graphical form. Photographic
documentation is provided in Appendix C.
Deviations: The test deviated from ASTM E119 due to the type of specimen that was being
tested as it is not explicitly covered by the ASTM E119 standard. The specimen
that was tested was of the actual size to be used in the field, and was exposed to the
furnace conditions of ASTM E119.
CONCLUSION
The average of the thermocouple temperatures in the bearing core exceeded 1200 °F at 5 hr
23 min 40 s into the test. ASTM E119 states that a fire resistance rating should be rounded to the nearest
integral minute. Therefore, based on the test results, Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc.’s FPT8844/12-
12/8-6 triple pendulum bearing achieved a fire-resistance rating of 5 hr 24 min when tested in general
accordance with ASTM E 119.
Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. 3 SwRI Project No.: 01.19577.01.402
Page 113 of 123

APPENDIX A
CLIENT SUPPLIED DRAWINGS
(CONSISTING OF 2 PAGES)
Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. SwRI Project No.: 01.19577.01.402
Page 114 of 123

Figure A-1. Thermocouple Layout and Test Assembly Drawing.
Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. A-1 SwRI Project No.: 01.19577.01.402
Page 115 of 123

Figure A-2. Test Assembly Dimensional Details.
Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. A-2 SwRI Project No.: 01.19577.01.402
Page 116 of 123

APPENDIX B
GRAPHICAL DATA
Page 117 of 123

CLIENT: Earthquake Protection Systems
SwRI PROJECT NO.: 01.19577.01.402
DATE: November 21, 2013
TEST ID: 13-325Earth.csv
2400
TC 1 Note: TC 5 and 6 installed on the column
2200 TC 2 section were for informational purposes
only. The average of the TCs on the bearing
TC 3
core exceeded 1200°F at 5 hr 23 min 40 s.
2000 TC 4
TC 5
1800 TC 6
1200 °F
1600
Temperature (°F)
TC 1-4 Average
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Time (min)
Figure B-1. Test Specimen Temperature vs. Time.
Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. B-1 SwRI Project No.: 01.19577.01.402
Page 118 of 123

SwRI PROJECT NO.: 01.19577.01.402
2400
Furnace Average
2200
Standard Curve
2000
1800
1600
Temperature (°F)
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Time (min)
Figure B-2. Average Furnace Temperature vs. Time.
Page 119 of 123

SwRI PROJECT NO.: 01.19577.01.402
0.20
0.10
Pressure (in. of H2O)
0.00
-0.10
-0.20
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Time (min)
Figure B-3. Furnace Pressure vs. Time.
Page 120 of 123

APPENDIX C
PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
Page 121 of 123

Figure C-1. Close Up Side View of Test Specimen prior to Test.
Figure C-2. Overall View of Test Specimen prior to Test.

Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. C-1 SwRI Project No.: 01.19577.01.402
Page 122 of 123
Figure C-3. Overall View of Test Specimen following Test.
Figure C-4. Overall View of Test Specimen following Test.

Earthquake Protection Systems, Inc. C-2 SwRI Project No.: 01.19577.01.402
Page 123 of 123

Seismic Isolation Report For Triple Pendulum Isolators

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seismic Isolation Report For Triple Pendulum Isolators

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seismic Isolation Engineered Solution for Başakşehir Health Campus

DBE Peak Isolator Displacement (Dd) 8.1” (206 mm)

MCE Peak Isolator Displacement (Dm) 17.0” (432 mm)

DBE Average 0-3s Median Sa 0.40g

DBE Expected Damage to Architectural and 1.8%

Continued Functionality Standard (12.0) Capacity Factors for Isolator Displacement

Sa (4 sec) Capacity Factor

Project Capacity Factor for Isolator Displacement

Sa (4 sec) Capacity Factor

Dm Equiv. Lateral Force Procedure 18.8 "

Governing Dm 18.8 "

Isolator Displacement Capactities

Isolator Dmc Dtmc

Minimum Story Stiffnesses

Seismic Design Forces

Bearing Capacities and Design Requirements

Bearing Capacities and Design Requirements

Bearing Capacities and Design Requirements

Bearing Capacities and Design Requirements

Bearing Capacities and Design Requirements

Frictions f1 f2 f3 Pendulum Lengths

Assume Dm = 20.9 in Lower Bound

Dtm(Static) = 1.15*Dm = 24.035 in.

Frictions f1 f2 f3 Pendulum Lengths

Assume Dm = 531 mm Lower Bound

Dtm(Static) = 1.15*Dm = 610 mm

Frictions f1 f2 f3 Pendulum Lengths

Assume Dm = 19.6 in Upper Bound

Dtm(Static) = 1.15*Dm = 22.54 in.

Frictions f1 f2 f3 Pendulum Lengths

Assume Dm = 498 mm Upper Bound

Dtm(Static) = 1.15*Dm = 573 mm

Figure 6 Acceleration Response Spectra for İkitelli Integrated Health Campus

= 0.08W/0.1055W * Initial Stiffness = 0.758 * Initial Stiffness

Table A: Isolated Superstructure Properties

Level M kN kips X-DIR Y-DIR

Lower Bound Friction Upper Bound Friction

Table C: MCE- Isolated Structure & Bearing Response

Lower Bound Friction Upper Bound Friction

Example Upper Bound Hysteretic Behavior

Floor Acceleration (g)

Figure 4: Sample Isolated Structure Floor Acceleration

Figure 5: Sample Isolated Structure 0-3 sec Median Spectral Acceleration

RSN161 RSN266 RSN838 RSN1158 RSN2699 RSN6890 RSN6911

RSN838 RSN900 RSN1762 RSN2893 RSN3758 RSN6911 RSN6890

RSN161 RSN266 RSN838 RSN1158 RSN2699 RSN6890 RSN6911

Table H: Fixed Base Code Minimum Superstructure Properties

X-DIR & Y-DIR Vy=2*Ve*I/R

Table J: MCE- Fixed Base Structure Response

Figure 4: Sample Fixed Base Structure Floor Acceleration

2.41 2.90 2.27 2.09 2.72 2.54 2.14 2.41

2.29 2.41 2.17 1.74 2.40 2.03 1.88 2.29

2.00 1.80 2.04 1.49 2.10 1.84 1.67 2.00

1.62 1.71 1.68 1.43 1.96 1.72 1.50 1.62

1.40 1.62 1.57 1.33 1.69 1.65 1.38 1.40

1.18 1.44 1.28 1.22 1.52 1.41 1.15 1.18

1.12 1.38 1.25 1.08 1.45 1.25 1.10 1.12

1.06 1.34 1.22 1.02 1.39 1.22 1.04 1.06

0.97 1.24 1.07 0.97 1.25 1.10 0.97 0.97

0.93 1.09 0.97 0.83 1.05 1.01 0.86 0.93

0.91 0.94 0.90 0.83 0.90 0.97 0.82 0.91

0.86 0.84 0.87 0.82 0.87 0.92 0.77 0.86

0.82 0.95 0.79 0.84 0.91 0.88 0.74 0.82

0.78 0.94 0.84 0.78 0.96 0.89 0.84 0.78

X-DIR & Y-DIR Vy=2VeI/R