Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The bais for all structural calculations for beam and rafts are either yhe method of modlus of
subgrade reaction or the method of compressibility modulus. Here the method of modlus of
subgrade reaction will be discussed.
In the method of subgrade reaction, one assumes the existance of proportionality between contact
pressure (p) and elastic line of the foundation.
= (1)
where k is modulus of subgrade reaction obtained from plate loading tes in kN/m3 and y is
vertical deflection.
P1 P2
K is not a pure soil parameter. It depends on soil type as well as on the dimension of the
foundation. One may assume k to be constant (approximate method) or variable (relatevyly
accurate).
x
P q
y
p = ky
Fig. 2
Eqn. (1) implies that the supprts medium is elastic and thus it follows Hook’s Law. One may
replace the elastic medium with sets of springs as shown in Fig. 3.
q
P1 P2
x
y
p = ky
Fig.3
The differential equation for the deflection curve (elastic line) of a beam supported by an elastic
foundationis given by:
=− + (2)
=− (2a)
= ( + )+ ( + ) (3)
where
l is the function of structural (flexural) regidity of the beam and the elasticity of the soil. It is
called the characteristics of the system and has a dimension of L-1. 1/l is the characteristic length
of the system. lx is thus an absolute number.
Diffrentiation Eqn (3) one successively can obtain, the slope , the shear force Q and the moment at a
given secti, i.e
= tanθ = θ
or
= ( )
= ( ℎ )
The constants of integration should be determined from the boundary and loading conditions.
Various conditions shall be discussed.
P
x
In order to get the deflection, slope and moment and shear equations, one uses the general equation of eqn
(3), however with assumption that at x , y 0. This assumption would be met of the coefficients
connected with the term become zero. Hence, for C1 = C2 = 0. Eqn. (3) may be written as:
= ( + ) (4)
Hence from Eqn. (4) it will be formed out that -(C3 – C4 ) = 0, from which C3 = C4 = C
= ( + ) (5)
= ∫ (6)
= 2 ∫ ( + ) (7)
From Table,
∫ sin ( ) =
If a = m, then = = =
∫ cos ( ) =
If a = m, then = = =
Hence =2 , Since =
=2
=
2
= ( + ) (8)
x
P
3/4 /l =
2
/l
= −
2
1/2/l
=
4l
/l
1/2/l
= −
2
M0
x
Similar to the equations obtained from concentrated load, one may derive equations for deflection, slope,
moment and shear as a result of concentrated moment (clockwise).
= (9)
3
= θ= (10)
= = (11)
= =- (12)
M0
x
/l
=
1/2/l
3
θ=
/l
1/2/l
=
2
3/4 /l = −
2
The deflection, slope, bending moment and shear have been derived. These different cases are considered.
x
A C B
a b
y
= (2 − − ) (13)
θ = ( − ) (14)
2
= ( − ) (15)
= ( − ) (16)
where
= ( + )
= ( + )
= ( )
= ( )
= ( − )
= ( − )
= ( )
= ( )
x
A B C
b
a y
= − ( − ) (17)
θ = ( − ) (18)
2
= ( − ) (19)
= ( − ) (20)
x
C A B
a
b
y
= ( − ) (21)
θ = ( − ) (22)
2
= − ( − ) (23)
= ( − ) (24)
Similar to the case of uniformly distributed loading, three cases are considered for triangular
loading.
qo
x
A C B
a b
l
= ( − −2 +4 ) (25)
1
θ =− ( + + − 2) (26)
2
= − ( − −2 ) (27)
= ( + − ) (28)
qo
x
C A B
a l
b
= ( − −2 ) (29)
1
θ = ( − − ) (30)
2
= − ( − −2 ) (31)
=− ( − + ) (32)
qo
x
A B C
l b
a
= ( − +2 ) (33)
1
θ =− ( − + ) (34)
2
= − ( − +2 ) (35)
= ( − − ) (36)
Values for trapezoidal loadings may be obtained by superposing two reversed triangules of different
heights.
For a beam of finite length the correct solution is the one that satisfies the differential equation of the elastic
line and also satisfies the required conditions at both ends of the beam.
The expression derived for beams of infinite length are applied to beams of finite length.
P q
a) MA, QA MB, QB x
A B
l
P q
MoA, PoA
MoB, PoA
b) x
A B
l
P q
c)
A B
l
In beam (a) there are bending moments and shear forces produced at A and B. Point in (c) M = 0, Q = 0.
Moments and shear forces can be vanished by inserting end-conditioning moments (MoA, QoA), where these
end-condition forces shall produce - MA, -QA and – MB, -QB.
By using these axpressions derived earlier, the conditions for free ends can be written as follows.
+ + + + (37a)
− + − + (37b)
+ + + + (37c)
− + − + (37d)
By solving Eqn, (37) one may determine the unknowns. However, an explicit form for the unknown would
lead to complicated expressions. Such problems are solved at best by resolving the original loading into
symmetrical and anti-symmetrical parts. For simplicity, consider a case of concentrated load as shown
below.
P MB, QB
c
a) MA, QA x
A B
l
P/2 P/2
M’’A, Q’’A c c M’’B, Q’’B
c) x
A B
l
MA, QA and MB, QB denote the moments and shear forces at A and B due to the original loading.
M’A and Q’A represent the moment and shear at point A due to the symmetrical loading. At point B, we
have the same M’A and -Q’A, only with the shear changing sign due to the symmetrical loading.
M’’A and Q’’A represent the moment and shear at point A due to the antisymmetrical loading. At point B,
we have -M’’A and Q’’A, only with the moment changing sign.
Then
= ′ + ′′ (38a)
= ′ − ′′ (38b)
= ′ + ′′ (38c)
= − ′ + ′′ (38d)
′ = ( + ) (39a)
′′ = ( − ) (39b)
′ = ( − ) (39c)
′′ = ( + ) (39d)
After havin determined the values of MA, QA and MB, QB interms of the known quantities, the next step
would be to remove moments and shears at points A and B by applying at these points P’o, M’o in the
symmetrical case, and P”o, M”o in the antisymmetrical case as shown below.
PoA PoB
P
c
a) MoA MoB x
A B
l
By supperposing the symmetrical and antisymmetrical components one obtains the end-conditioning
forces for the original case.
= ′ + ′′ (40a)
= ′ − ′′ (40b)
= ′ + ′′ (40c)
= ′ − ′′ (40d)
In order to remove the moments and shear at A and B on the infinite beam, it would be required that MoA,
PoA , MoB, PoB should produce together -MA, -QA, -MB, and -QB. This happens if P’o and M’o produce -M’A,
-Q’A at A and -M’A, +Q’A at B, and also if P”o and M”o produce -M”A, -Q”A at A and +M”A, -Q”A at B.
From the above conditions one determines the value of the end conditioning from the symmetrical and
antisymmetrical cases.
Using an already derived expressions and the adopted sign convension one may write for the symmetrical
case:
(1 + )= − ′
(1 + ) + (41a)
(1 − )= − ′
(1 − ) − (41b)
=4 [ ′ (1 + ) + (1 − ) (42a)
=− [ ′ (1 + ) + 2 (1 − ) (42b)
where
= ( )( ) ( )( )
or =
( ℎ )
(1 − ) + (1 − ) = − ′′ (43a)
(1 + )= − ′′
(1 + ) − (43b)
From which
=4 [ ′′ (1 − ) + (1 + ) (44a)
′ =− [ " (1 − ) + 2 (1 + ) (44b)
where = ( )( ) (
or =
)( ) ( ℎ )
Uisng the relative stiffness ll, one may classify beams into three catagories.
For beams of catagory (i), one may neglect the deformation of the beam since in comparison to the
deformation of ground it would be negligible.
For catagory (ii), one needs to calculate the deformation and no simplification is allowed.
For category (iii), when considering one end of the beam, one may assume that the other end is infinitly far
away. Forces applied at one end will have negligible effect at the other end. For such cases one may assume
Ale = Ble = Cle = Dle = 0.
kN/m3
=///=