Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Icoms - 2020 320 321
Icoms - 2020 320 321
D.BAG
MBA Dept., NIT ROURKELA
dinabandhu.bag@gmail.com
Abstract —
Capital cost of an open cast mines is determined based on many irreversible geological factors e.g. topography, ore grade,
degree of mechanization, etc. Many equipment are procured by the mines during project initiation. However midway into the
life of the mines, half from the original list may remain untouched. Why are capital equipment’s needed in mining operations?
Mining industry is constantly in search of rapid capacity expansion, increased productivity, digital technology adoption and
reduced costs. Besides the economics the new dimension of development focuses on automation and cleaner mining system.
For faster rate of production, mechanization at high degree is imperative. Mine optimization deals with conventional tools of
production planning ignoring the drain on capital and related GHG implications.
Increase in idle times of machineries leads to increase in production cost. In order to reduce the idle time or waiting time
the number of machineries may be increased. Due to large number of machines greater capital investments are needed that
contributes to higher total GHG. The limitation is JIT (Just in Time) model of procurement of spares, does not exist in mining
towns.
Keywords—carbon foot print, trade off, operating costs, equipment’s, carbon gearing ratio
286
International Conference on Opencast Mining Technology & Sustainability
and involve minimum labour hours to displace or • The mines will incur lower rental service expense
dissemble. At first, for a given production rate, number of equipment rather than owning them.
of loaders are determined and the number of haulers • Carbon foot print is lower.
are obtained to match the dimensions of the loader. • The trade- off between GHG emissions and cost
The fleet mix deployment schedule is a simultaneous of borrowing are explained
consideration of the hourly production rate, hauling
time and distance, loader cycle time, etc. The capacity • There are no third party liability by the mines
rate of each of equipment are chosen subject to the because the equipment’s are non owned by the
dimensions available with the OEM against the fact mines.
that the ratio of operating cost / purchase cost would There are few limitations of this study;
vary across OEMs.
• This does not cover the sample data necessary
A. Objectives to conduct the analysis of field trials and
experimental response results.
The principal objectives include;
• This does not cover a specific sponsoring
• to explore the trade- off between optimal capital authority or mining company to bear the costs of
costs and optimal GHG emissions for open cast experiments.
mines. • This intends to use secondary data available
• To arrive at the fleet mix and ownership mix (self in cross country studies which could mix the
or lease) of scheduled equipment that minimizes empirical information compiled for metal and
the total capital costs. coal mines together.
• To reduce the total GHGs emitted from face Therefore, future research must include extensive
operations and mining activities. collection of longitudinal test data from variety of
field conditions to demonstrate the robustness of
• To implement digitalized solutions of network optimization results. Open cast Mining must attempt
monitoring of mining sub-systems to reduce to minimize the large burden of capital costs which
their downtime. cannot be recovered from pricing of the production or
charging to its future generations of customers.
II. Conclusions
Based on the study, the following conclusions are
drawn:
• the mines can avail of leasing service of heavy
machineries instead of spending OPEX &
CAPEX.
287