Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/230992003
CITATIONS READS
114 3,435
2 authors, including:
Achim Mahrle
Fraunhofer IWS Dresden
89 PUBLICATIONS 870 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Achim Mahrle on 29 May 2014.
Abstract
Fibre lasers offer distinct advantages over established laser systems with respect to power
efficiency, beam guidance and beam quality. Consequently, the potential of these new laser
beam sources will be increasingly exploited for laser cutting applications that are
conventionally carried out with CO2 lasers. However, theoretical estimates of the effective
absorptivity at the cut front suggest that the shorter wavelength of the fibre laser in
combination with its high focusability seems to be primarily advantageous for thin sheet metal
cutting whereas the CO2 laser is probably still capable of cutting thicker materials more
efficiently. This surprising result is a consequence of the absorptivity behaviour of metals that
shows essential quantitative differences for the corresponding wavelengths of both laser
sources as a function of the angle of incidence between the laser beam and the material to be
cut. In evaluation of the revealed dependences, solution strategies for an improvement of the
efficiency of fibre laser cutting of thicker metal sheets are suggested.
(Some figures in this article are in colour only in the electronic version)
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the inert-gas laser beam fusion cutting process and resultant cut kerf geometry.
where ρ and hm are the density and the necessary increase in
the specific enthalpy to cause melting of the material to be cut.
It is clear from equation (1) that the power requirement
PFC depends on the kerf width wK , which is in turn a function
of several laser beam and cutting parameters. The objective of
efficiently conducted cutting trials should be a minimization
of the kerf width in order to keep material losses as well
as the energy requirements small. A lower limit of the cut
kerf is approximately given by the diameter d0 = 2 r0 of the
beam if the depth of focus is lying in the range of the sheet
thickness being cut. Assuming initially an ideal process in
which the available laser power PL is completely transformed
into internal energy of the material removed from the cut kerf,
the theoretically achievable maximum cutting speeds vC can
be estimated from the relationship
Figure 2. Theoretically achievable cutting speeds versus the
PL material thickness for an ‘ideal’ cutting process with wK = 2 r0 and
vC = . (2)
tC · 2 r0 · ρ · hm ηFC = ηth = ηET = 1.
Calculated values of theoretical cutting speeds versus the sheet
thickness are shown in figure 2 for steel with ρ = 7800 kg m−3 , When laser radiation impinges upon a metallic surface,
hm = 1174 kJ kg−1 and PL = 1000 W. The cutting speeds only the part PL,T penetrates into the bulk material whereas the
of real cutting trials must be smaller than the theoretically other part PL,R is reflected. The transmitted part PL,T is mainly
calculated speeds because the laser power PL is only partially absorbed within a very thin surface layer with the thickness
absorbed and some of this absorbed part can be lost for the λL
cutting process due to heat conduction into the surrounding lA = , (4)
4π · k
base material. The thermodynamic efficiency ηFC of a real
fusion cutting process can be determined by relating the where λL denotes the wavelength of the laser radiation and k the
theoretical power value PFC to the actually applied laser power extinction coefficient of the irradiated material [12]. Typical
PL that is necessary to cut with the speed vC through the values of the absorption depth lA in metals are considerably
material with the thickness tC : smaller than the wavelength λL of the laser radiation because
k > 1. Therefore, the transmitted part PL,T of the incident
PFC PFC PL,abs laser radiation can be regarded as immediately absorbed on the
ηFC = = · = ηth · ηET . (3)
PL PL,Abs PL surface. As a result, the energy transfer efficiency ηET as well
In this relation, ηET denotes the energy or power transfer as the overall process efficiency ηFC of a fusion cutting process
efficiency being the ratio of absorbed laser power PL,abs to are determined mainly by the absorptivity of the material being
incident laser power PL and ηth the thermal efficiency as the cut. The dominant role of the absorptivity is, among others,
ratio of the theoretically needed power PFC to the absorbed evidenced by the strong influence of the beam polarization on
power PL,abs . Assuming that the molten material is removed the cutting performance [13–15]. Assuming constant average
from the cut kerf just after melting and before significant values of the absorptivity AAve and the reflectivity RAve on the
heat conduction in the surrounding material occurs then the surface of the inclined cutting front, it is
thermal efficiency becomes approximately ηth ≈ 1. In that ηFC ≈ ηET ≡ AAve = 1 − RAve . (5)
case, the overall efficiency ηFC of a laser beam fusion cutting
process is determined mainly by the achievable energy transfer Consequently, the process efficiency ηFC of laser beam fusion
efficiency ηET . cutting strongly depends on the absorptivity AAve , which is
2
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 175507 A Mahrle and E Beyer
in turn a function of the laser wavelength. Conventionally, The plasma frequency ωP is proportional to the square root
laser fusion cutting processes are performed with CO2 lasers of the free electron density ne and can be calculated with the
and a laser wavelength of λCO2 = 10.6 µm [16]. It is relation
anticipated that the nowadays available high-power fibre lasers 2 1/2
with a wavelength of λYb = 1.07 µm possess considerable e · ne (T )
ωP = = C · ne (T ). (12)
potential to change the limits for cutting performance because ε0 · m e
of their better focusability and an expected better absorptivity
The constant C combines the physical constants electron
behaviour of metals to the fibre laser radiation with the shorter
charge e = 1.602 19 × 10−19 C, vacuum permittivity ε0 =
wavelength. However, the achievable performance advantages
8.854 19 × 10−12 A s V−1 m−1 and electron mass me =
seem to be restricted to thin and medium section steels [17–21].
0.910 95 × 10−30 kg. A relation for an estimate of the free
Consequently, it is highly desirable to compare both laser
electron density ne is provided by the Drude theory of metals
systems with respect to the achievable efficiency in cutting
[24]. It is
applications. Z · ρ(T )
ne (T ) = NA · . (13)
AA
2. Absorption of laser energy on metallic surfaces
In this equation, NA = 0.6022 × 1024 mol−1 is the Avogadro
The reflectivity RAve as the ratio of the reflected power PL,R number, i.e. the number of atoms per mole, Z is the number
to the total laser power PL depends on the polarization state of weakly bound valence electrons per atom, AA is the atomic
of the incident laser radiation. The reflectivities RP and RS of mass and ρ the mass density. In the case of iron, it is Z = 2
parallel and perpendicularly polarized radiation are given by and AA = 55.8 × 10−3 kg mol−1 . The density of liquid metals
is commonly a linear function of temperature. Experimental
the Fresnel’s relations
data can be adequately represented by the equation
(n · cos ϕIn − 1)2 + (k · cos ϕIn )2
RP = , (6) ρ = ρm.p. −
· (T − Tm.p. ), (14)
(n · cos ϕIn + 1)2 + (k · cos ϕIn )2
where Tm.p. is the melting point temperature and ρm.p. is
(n − cos ϕIn )2 + k 2
RS = , (7) the density at the melting point. For iron, it is ρm.p. =
(n + cos ϕIn )2 + k 2 7030 kg m−3 ,
= 0.88 kg m−3 K−1 and Tm.p. = 1808 K
where ϕIn is the angle of incidence, n the refractive index and [25]. At the boiling point with Tb.p. approximately 3000 K,
k the extinction coefficient [22]. In the case of un-polarized the density becomes ρb.p. = 5974 kg m−3 . Consequently, the
or circularly polarized radiation, the reflectivity RAve can be electron densities of liquid iron lie in the range between 1.52
estimated as the average value of the reflectivities RP and RS and 1.29 × 1029 m−3 and the according plasma frequencies are
according to 2.2 × 1016 s−1 at the melting point and 2.0 × 1016 s−1 at the
RP + RS boiling point. The Drude theory also provides a relationship
RAve = . (8)
2 for the collision frequency νC according to
The optical parameters refractive index n and extinction
ρe (T ) · ne (T ) · e2
coefficient k are functions of the permittivity ε according to νC = (15)
the relations me
2 1/2
(ε1 + ε22 )1/2 + ε1 with the electrical resistivity ρe (T ), which is in turn a function
n= and of temperature. In the case of liquid iron, the electrical
2
resistivity increases linearly with increasing temperature. This
2 1/2
(ε1 + ε22 )1/2 − ε1 dependence is described by the equation
k= , (9)
2
ρe (T ) = ρe,0 +
e · (T − 273 K) (16)
where ε1 is the real and ε2 the imaginary part of the permittivity
[23]. These quantities can be calculated with the equations with ρe,0 = 112.3 × 10−8 m and
e = 0.0154 ×
ωP2 νC ω2 10−8 m K−1 [25]. Calculated values of the electrical
ε1 = 1 + and ε2 = · 2 P 2 (10) resistivity are ρe,m.p. = 1.36 × 10−6 m at the melting point
ωL2 + νC2 ωL ωL + νC
and ρe,b.p. = 1.54 × 10−6 m at the boiling point.
as a function of the plasma frequency ωP , the laser frequency Calculated values of the refractive index n and the
ωL and the collision frequency νC . The laser frequency ωL extinction coefficient k at the melting and the boiling point
is inversely proportional to the wavelength λ of the emitted as well as averaged values in the range between these
radiation: characteristic temperatures are listed in table 1. It is obvious
2π · c0
ωL = , (11) that the index of refraction and the extinction coefficient vary
λ only slightly with temperature but both are strongly dependent
where c0 is the vacuum speed of light. Consequently, the on the wavelength of the emitted radiation. Calculated values
laser frequency of a Yb fibre laser with λYb = 1.07 µm is of the averaged theoretical absorptivity AAve of circularly
ωL = 1.762 × 1015 s−1 . In comparison, CO2 lasers with polarized or un-polarized laser radiation as a function of the
λCO2 = 10.6 µm have a laser frequency of 1.778 × 1014 s−1 . angle ϕIn of incidence are shown in figure 3. It is obvious
3
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 175507 A Mahrle and E Beyer
4
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 175507 A Mahrle and E Beyer
5
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 175507 A Mahrle and E Beyer
Figure 8. Average of the effective laser intensity as a function of speed for a given laser beam at a particular power level.
sheet thickness. Furthermore, multiple reflections which play a considerable
role in the process efficiency under specific cutting conditions,
e.g. in high-speed thin section cutting with a keyhole-like
interaction zone [27] or in thick section cutting with curved
cutting fronts [9, 28] are not taken into account. Additional
experimental work is consequently intended to verify the
model assumptions and the limits for the applicability of the
derived model.
6
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 175507 A Mahrle and E Beyer
Figure 11. Longitudinal micro-sections of the cut front for different values of the oscillation amplitude (f = 200 Hz). Parameter: fibre laser
IPG YLR 4000 MM (M 2 ≈ 7), laser power = 2500 W, focus radius = 55 µm, focal position = −6 mm, cutting speed = 0.6 m min−1 ,
material = stainless steel 1.4301, thickness = 8 mm, cutting gas = nitrogen, cutting gas pressure = 8 bar.
7
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 175507 A Mahrle and E Beyer
8
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 175507 A Mahrle and E Beyer
[5] Schulz W, Becker D, Franke J, Kemmerling R and Herziger G [18] Sparkes M, Gross M, Celotto S, Zhang T and O’Neill W 2006
1993 Heat-conduction losses in laser cutting of metals Inert cutting of medium section stainless steel using a
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 26 1357–63 2.2 kW high brightness fibre laser Proc. ICALEO 2006
[6] Olsen F O 1994 Fundamental mechanisms of cutting front (Scottsdale, AZ) (Orlando, FL: Laser Institute of America)
formation in laser cutting Laser Materials Processing: pp 197–205
Industrial and Microelectronics Applications, Proc. SPIE [19] Wandera C, Salminen A, Olsen F O and Kujanpää V 2006
2207 402–13 Cutting of stainless steel with fiber and disk laser Proc.
[7] Schulz W, Kostrykin V, Nießen M, Michel J, Petring D, ICALEO 2006 (Scottsdale, AZ) (Orlando, FL: Laser
Kreutz E W and Poprawe R 1999 Dynamics of ripple Institute of America) pp 211–20
formation and melt flow in laser beam cutting J. Phys. D: [20] O’Neill B 2008 Laser cutting: a technology with some surprise
Appl. Phys. 32 1219–28 in store The Laser User issue 51, Summer 2008
[8] Kovalev O B and Zaitsev A V 2004 Modeling of the [21] Petring D, Schneider F, Wolf N and Nazery V 2008 The
free-surface shape in laser cutting of metals: I. Effect of relevance of brightness for high power laser cutting and
polarization of the Gaussian beam on the shape of the welding Proc. ICALEO 2008 (Temecula, CA) (Orlando, FL:
surface formed J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 45 915–21 Laser Institute of America) pp 95–103
[9] Kovalev O B and Zaitsev A V 2005 Modeling of the [22] Modest M F 2001 Reflectivity and absorptivity of opaque
free-surface shape in laser cutting of metals: II. Model of surfaces LIA Handbook of Laser Materials Processing
multiple reflection and absorption of radiation J. Appl. ed J F Ready and D F Farson (Orlando, FL: Magnolia
Mech. Tech. Phys. 46 9–13 Publishing) pp 175–81
[10] Gross M, Black I and Müller W H 2005 3-D simulation model [23] Beyer E 1995 Schweissen mit Laser (Berlin: Springer)
for gas-assisted laser cutting Lasers Eng. 15 129–46 pp 28–36
[11] Gross M 2006 On gas dynamic effects in the modelling of [24] Ashcroft N W and Mermin N D 1976 Solid State Physics
laser cutting processes Appl. Math. Modelling (Orlando, FL: Saunders College Publishing) 799pp
30 307–18 [25] Iida T and Guthrie R I L 1993 The Physical Properties of
[12] Pedrotti F, Pedrotti L, Bausch W and Schmidt H 2002 Optik Liquid Metals (Oxford: Clarendon) 288pp
fuer Ingenieure (Berlin: Springer) 2nd edn p 602 [26] O’Neill W, Gross M, Sparkes M and Zhang T 2008 Analysis
[13] Olsen F O 2001 Polarisation effects in laser cutting LIA of disc and fibre laser cutting of metals Stuttgarter Laser
Handbook of Laser Materials Processing ed J F Ready and Technologies Forum (Stuttgart, Germany, 4–5 March 2008)
D F Farson pp 433–6 (section 12.1.7) [27] Pressig, K U 1995 Verfahrens- und anlagenentwicklung zum
[14] Niziev V G and Nesterov A V 1999 Influence of beam laserstrahl-hochgeschwindigkeitsschneiden von
polarisation on laser cutting efficiency J. Phys. D: Appl. metallischem bandmaterial Thesis RWTH Aachen,
Phys. 32 1455–61 Germany
[15] Nesterov A V and Niziev V G 2000 Laser beams with axially [28] Duan J, Man H C and Yue T M 2001 Modelling the laser
symmetric polarization J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. fusion cutting process: I. Mathematical modelling of the cut
33 1817–22 kerf geometry for laser fusion cutting of thick metal J. Phys.
[16] Powell J 1998 CO2 Laser Cutting 2nd edn (Berlin: Springer) D: Appl. Phys. 34 2127–34
[17] Olsen F O 2006 An evaluation of the cutting potential of [29] Mahrle A, Bartels F and Beyer E 2008 Theoretical aspects of
different types of high power lasers Proc. ICALEO 2006 the process efficiency in laser beam cutting with fibre lasers
(Scottsdale, AZ) (Orlando, FL: Laser Institute of America) Proc. ICALEO 2008 (Temecula, CA, USA) (Laser Institute
pp 188–96 of America) pp 703–12